Add RSS RSS

Law Firm Merger Mania: Collected Rumors and News

law firm merger.jpgLately it seems there's been a lot of law-firm merger activity. The statistics bear this out, although there's disagreement as to degree. From a piece by Leigh Jones in the National Law Journal:

Law firms didn't slow down their march to the altar in the second quarter of 2008, but just how many mergers occurred depends on whom you ask. Altman Weil announced a sharp increase in merger activity during the second quarter. It pegged law firm mergers at 26, compared with 18 in the first quarter.

At the same time, competitor Hildebrandt International announced steady merger activity, with a total of 14, compared with 12 mergers in the first quarter of 2008.

There has also been a steady increase in rumors about law firm mergers. Some of them will turn out to be true, some not. The fact that some gossip won't pan out doesn't make it any less interesting. Lawyers need some way to pass the time, and speculating about their competitors -- or themselves -- is as good a way as any.

Here's an excerpt from a recent profile of our media idol, former Us Weekly and Star editrix Bonnie Fuller, from the New York Times:

Ms. Fuller knows the dyad of funny / hurtful, having run cover articles about people getting divorced, pregnant and tossed into rehab. Sometimes those stories were true.

"There have been a lot of false pregnancies and laugh-out-loud groaners," says Simon Dumenco, a longtime analyst of the magazine industry who writes a column for Advertising Age. "What she has done is gotten at a kind of essential truth that is less about the specifics of the gossip. This endless speculation and estimation about the lives of these people has become the stuff of culture."

In that last sentence, replace "these people" with "these law firms," and that's ATL for you. A lot of what we write in these pages may turn out to be inaccurate, but we're getting at "a kind of essential truth that is less about the specifics of the gossip."

So, with that caveat in mind, are you interested in hearing the latest law-firm merger gossip? Read more -- about rumored deals involving Baker & McKenzie, Heller Ehrman, Nixon Peabody, Pillsbury Winthrop, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, and Harris & Moure (who?) -- after the jump.

1. Nixon Peabody / Pillsbury Winthrop. We recently wrote about a possible merger here. Some commenters dismissed it as crazy talk. Since our earlier report, however, we've heard by email from others who say they've heard the same thing.

Could it be a giant feedback loop? Maybe. But it seems fairly undisputed, at least as to Nixon Peabody, that the firm "has been looking for a merger for some time now," as one tipster puts it.

2. Foley & Lardner. From a tipster, a barebones report:

Heard directly from a partner at Foley & Lardner that they are in serious talks to merge. You might want to follow up on this one.

We did follow up, but Foley had no comment.

3. Baker & McKenzie / Heller Ehrman. We've written about this one endlessly. A few more tidbits, from different sources:

"Only a small percentage of the [Heller] partners/shareholders were in the know about the identity of the merger candidate (as of last week). Of course, Baker & McKenzie has been all over the blogs (yours included) for the last two weeks. B&McK fits the generic description I have been given (large, corporate practice), but so do many firrms. Those who do know are definitely not talking. I also know that many partners (called shareholders) are totally in the dark -- or were as of last week -- and are quite unhappy about the way they are being treated, sort of in the paternalistic "trust me" mode by management that obviously does not think them to be important enough to be included in the knowledge window....."

"If the merger should be with Baker, I (and many others) wonder how Heller's once-stellar insurance recovery practice would fit in? Or if the people at the top of trying to make it fit in?"

"We're all so anxious about what's going to happen. I'm sure everything will be ok in the end regardless, but still, it's a bit stressful. But yeah, I'm positive that Baker's the one they're still in talks with, and it's getting to the point where they're including more shareholders in the discussion. There will still need to be a shareholder vote and everything though before the final decision is made, and god only knows when that'll be."

4. Baker & McKenzie / Harris & Moure. Regardless of what's happening with Heller and Baker -- some commenters have speculated that Baker is leading Heller on -- Baker may have some other romantic possibilities on the horizon:

I know this one is going to sound a bit strange, but I have heard it from two good sources now and I am starting to believe it. Baker & McKenzie has no presence in the Pacific Northwest and it should and the rumour I am hearing is that they are on the verge of swallowing up Harris & Moure, a micro international law firm that is about to open an office in Qingdao, China. Story is that it will put B&M into two cities at once. This is not verified, of course, but I am dying to know if this is true because I see this sort of deal as a real trend.

We didn't reach out to Baker on this one, in light of their earlier statement about merger rumors, issued in response to the Heller talk:

Like all leading law firms, we are continuously studying the market for strategic growth opportunities. At any given time, we may be in discussion with a number of individuals, practice groups or firms around the world. By Firm policy, we do not comment on such discussions until they are positively concluded.

5. Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal. From The Lawyer (via the ABA Journal):

Elliott Portnoy, the man who pulled the trigger on the jobs of 124 lawyers and staff just over a month ago, said the lateral hiring pipeline that has seen dozens of partners join the firm already this year is now likely to slow.

But Portnoy reveals that he is already focusing on implementing an ambitious strategic plan that could see Sonnenschein increase dramatically its scale and geographical reach. The plan includes a major domestic merger deal, offices across the Continent and China and re-entry into the ­London market with the acquisition of a local firm.

So that's a round-up of what we've heard lately. If you have some info to pass along, please email us (subject line: "Law Firm Merger Mania"). Thanks.

A tale of two takes on law firm mergers in '08 [National Law Journal]
Sonnenschein's Ambitious Growth Plans Call for 2 Mergers [ABA Journal]
Sonnenschein: Portnoy bids to return firm to US 'A' list [TheLawyer.com]
101 Secrets (and 9 Lives) of a Magazine Star [New York Times]

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:25 PM

first

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:26 PM

Guys in my high school pondered about law firm mergers all the time. It was no big deal.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:27 PM

Law firm mergers = TTT

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:28 PM

is all this merger mania simply a result of a slumping economy? if so, how does it measure up to mergers during recessions in the past, in terms of the number of mergers?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:29 PM

yawn, a lot of this is old news

at least it's collected in one place though

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:30 PM

I always read the law firm mergers posts and think they are very interesting. I hope you continue to report on this!

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:31 PM

You're not taking your merger talk and sticking it where the Sondon'tschein. That's my complaint, Portnoy.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:44 PM

as having 'first' been mentioned on atl a while ago and here again. baker will screw over heller and leave the merger and just take the ny partners ala coudert brothers

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:47 PM

Harris & Moure writes the China Law Blog (www.chinalawblog.com) and has a very respected international practice.

The merger rumor re Baker & McKenzie seems way off base; makes no sense whatsoever.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:52 PM

3:27 has a point. You don't hear these rumors about the Cravaths and Wachtells and Davis Polks of the world.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:55 PM

On an unrelated note, can anyone explain why people hire management consultants? It seems like a frivolous profession to a layman.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:56 PM

who is Foley & Larder merging with?

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:58 PM

Did Lat just compare ATL to Us Weekly? Ego much?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:00 PM

It's not egotistical, it's just aspirational - finding a role model.

Lat described his original blog, Underneath Their Robes, as an "Us Weekly" for the federal judiciary.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:02 PM

3:58 - Us Weekly is not exactly the pinnacle of American journalism....

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:07 PM

4:02, nor is ATL.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:12 PM

A Sonnenchein insider let slip that Elliot Portnoy is pregnant, getting divorced and tossed into rehab!! omg!

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:23 PM

@ 3:55, to make it seem like something is being done. management consultants tell their clients what they already know, but rephrase it.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:23 PM

who is Foley & Larder?

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:26 PM

BLIND ITEM: This former B-list Chicago firm, now maybe a C-list also-ran but looking more like a D-lister, which seriously towers up in the clouds from a real estate perspective, might be looking to take a foreigner to the altar. We hear than this firm still looks on the bright side and considers itself A-list in certain roles, but we find it hard to believe that anyone you've ever heard of would marry this pig - don't forget how they treat the help!

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:40 PM

4:23: then why are some management consulting firms considered prestigious? I can't understand why this is a billion dollar industry; a friend of mine explained his work to me, but it sounded entirely frivolous.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:56 PM

Ooo ooo, 4:26 are you talking about PWSP??? Little bit of history involved there.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/04/06/BAGASI3NPQ1.DTL

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:11 PM

If you pay a management consulting firm $5 million in fees, but they come up with an idea that yields $20 million in savings, they more than earned their fee.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:27 PM

What has Sonnenschein ever been "A-list" at? The only department that might even come close is real estate. And even then, they aren't even the best shop in Chi-town in that area. That title has long belonged to DLA's predecessor. Sidley's probably better as well.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:38 PM

The upcoming law firm mergers are going to shock the world! I can't wait!

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 6:02 PM

SLOW NEWS DAY!

In other news, an Alabama TTT is considering merging with an Arkansas TTT...

Jesus Christ, how about some news about white guys with asian girls?

- King of WGWAG

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 6:09 PM

4:56 that was an interesting article you linked to about Martin Macy of Pillsbury. I googled his name to try to read more about him and then I found out he died just a few years after Pillsbury laid him off!

What a tragedy, this guy works for Pillsbury for 41 years, he's making a mere $35k and he gets laid off only to die a few years later. So sad.

Pillsbury sucks!

http://legalpad.typepad.com/my_weblog/2008/02/martin-macy-for.html

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 6:35 PM

5:27, I think that "towers up in the clouds from a real estate perspective" refers to office space high up in the sears tower, not to any legal acumen.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:21 PM

This is just too funny.

This is Dan Harris, founder of Harris & Moure. We are NOT in any talks with Baker & McKenzie, though it is an honor to have made it on ATL.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:25 PM

6:35, yeah, I got that Sears Tower reference. Could be referring to Schiff too, although I don't think so.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:42 PM

What happened to the Thelen rumors?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:43 PM

If Cravath and Wachtell merged, could they possibly take over the world? And if so, would we like it?

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 8:25 PM

Could Foley be talking to Thelen? Foley has a weak presence in the SF Bay Area and that could be a beneficial move.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:15 PM

7:43, in response to your second question, "no." Martin Lipton is up there with Dick Cheney in the Antichrist competition.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:44 PM

Seriously, what's the scoop on the Foley & Lardner merger plans?

Anonymous Foley Dude

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 1:06 AM

Foley & Lardner is a solid firm in a good financial position to make a move and sweep up someone smaller. Foley is so big (1,000+) that it's hard to imagine someone would be able to take them on. I've only heard people say good things about Foley.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:29 AM

If Foley is merging, it has to be an acquisition. With 1,000 lawyers and ~ Amlaw 25, the only one that's bigger than it that has been rumored to be merging with anyone would be White & Case (supposedly interested in Sonnenschein), and that would make no sense.

The only two things that would make sense is that Foley's Chicago office is almost as big as Sonnenschein's home office there, and Foley has a NY work ethic for its associates. Other than that...just, no. I cannot imagine the culture clash in general, nevermind the institutional egos.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:29 AM

Foley & Lardner LLP is in a strong position during a down market and poised to snap up a faltering firm. Accordingly, Foley will be merging with Cravath. The combined firm will retain the far more prestigious Foley & Lardner name and the headquarters will remain in Milwaukee. The merger makes strategic sense as it will grow Foley's presence in the New York region.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 12:03 PM

Why does Foley & Lardner always generate such a response?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 19, 2008 4:49 PM

Any news about Foley?

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 19, 2008 5:20 PM

heard king & spalding is having serious financial issues - has been talking to kilpatrick stockton re merger

Post Your Comment