Add RSS RSS

Lawsuit of the Day: Wal-Mart discriminated against macaque named Dick?

macaque.jpgA woman in Missouri says the scary-looking bonnet macaque (see specimen at right) helps her social anxiety disorder. Having that thing in our arms would increase our anxiety immensely, but to each their own.

Local health officials apparently share our anxiety. They allegedly banned the monkey from grocery stores and restaurants, including Wal-Mart. From the Kansas City Star:

A southwest Missouri woman has sued Wal-Mart, local health officials and Cox Health Systems, claiming they discriminated against her and her monkey named Richard.

Debby Rose of Springfield said in the lawsuit that the 10-year-old bonnet macaque helps curb a social anxiety disorder that can cause her to have panic attacks in public.

We’re no experts in naming monkeys, but “Richard” seems like a horrible monkey name. We’d have a lot more respect for this woman and her suit if her monkey were named “Bananas” or “Bobo.” But that’s off-topic.

Rose’s suit claims that the local health department decided that the monkey was not a legitimate service animal and told establishments not to admit her and her little monkey. Was the problem that the “service animal” is a monkey, or that social anxiety disorder is a questionable disability?

We’d try to sort it out, but we’re still schoolgirl-giggling over “macaque named Dick.”

Springfield woman’s lawsuit alleges discrimination against her monkey [Kansas City Star]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:04 AM

SLOW NEWS DAY!

In other news, an Alabama TTT is considering merging with an Arkansas TTT...

Jesus Christ, how about some news about white guys with asian girls?

- King of WGWAG

and first...

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:05 AM

"We'd have a lot more respect for this woman and her suit if her monkey were named 'Bananas' or 'Bobo.'"

Ugh . . . no, you wouldn't. I'm sorry, but those names are completely unoriginal.

I would prefer "Achilles" or "Platus" or anything vaguely from antiquity.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:11 AM

Dick's dick might spray the Wal-Mart bananas with monkey pee and make people ill. Or he might throw his own feces...they do that, you know. He might even eat his own feces, which could also make people ill.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:12 AM


I prefer the ironic: Flipper the Monkey, Rover the Monkey, Fido the Monkey etc.

I think Walmart would be BETTER with some monkeys.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:14 AM

"dick...er, Richard"

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:24 AM

I knew a guy growing up who had a pet pig named Mavis. When Mavis croaked, they had a large supply of bacon.

Things are really slow both at my office and on this blog today... ahh, summer.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:29 AM

I will never relent in defending America - whatever it takes.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:32 AM

Some of Walmart's best employees are actually monkeys, no? What's the big deal?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:33 AM

Debby Rose just wants to pet her monkey Dick.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:34 AM

9:05 - would you accept Dr. Zaius?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:36 AM

To each *their* own? Are we talking about people with multiple personality disorder?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:39 AM

1) I thought this was really funny, even if it's not the most important lawsuit of the day.

2) Thank you 9:36 for making feel slightly less neurotic for noticing that.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:41 AM

Guys at my high school used to play with their monkeys in public all the time, it was no big deal.

FRAT STUD

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:42 AM

Walmart = TTT

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:45 AM

C'mon guys, stop monkey-ing around. This is serious.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:48 AM

Macaque ? Or My KOK ?? Either way it's a large, furry troublemaker that has no business on your shoulder in public.

Monkeys = TTT

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:52 AM

9:45 = awkward silence generator. There's a guy like you on my floor. When he comes into my office I immediately know its going to be for one of three purposes:

- to share a video that's been circulating on YouTube for at least weeks, if not months/years;

- to discuss the last stale video he made me watch; or

- to tell me the sort of awful joke you've shown a knack for

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:53 AM

She should have gotten a Monkee instead. He could sing her Daydream Believer -- always calming.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRr-sNlddRo&feature=related

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 9:55 AM

Is there a copy of the complaint? I would love to read it.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:00 AM

This post could use more information on the legal angle:

Are they filing suit in Federal Court?

What exactly does she allege? What are her chances of prevailing?

What type of precedent could this set for primate relations? What about animals and strict liability? (Is the monkey feral?)

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:00 AM

Someone needs to spank that monkey.

Monkeyspanking = TTT

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:04 AM

9:36 - you beat me to it. Kash, you're being judged.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:04 AM

9:36 - you beat me to it. Kash, you're being judged.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:10 AM

9:52,

check this out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prtsIbjTjQc

hahaha! i'll be down in 5 to talk to you about it.

-9:45

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:12 AM

What about the rumor that White & Case no offered 15 of their summer class...

Any news?

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:15 AM

A Florida statue:

"(e) A public accommodation may exclude or remove any animal from the premises, including a service animal, if the animal's behavior poses a direct threat to the health and safety of others."

I'm not sure whether it's the same in her state, but I think that they may be able to move for summary judgment on the basis of the "direct threat" phrase.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:28 AM

Her IIED claim would most likely fail, because she will be unable to prove the defendants acted intentionally or recklessly.

Her NIED may prevail, however, as she will almost certainly be able to prove that she suffered actual emotional harm, based on her having social anxiety disorder.

Ok, I'd better get back to studying for the bar. :D

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:31 AM

10:28, that is the most TTT legal analysis I've ever seen. Go ahead and register for the February bar because you're not passing this one.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:33 AM

To those wondering as to the nature of the complaint, perhaps she is claiming under the ADA. From my limited knowledge of accommodations for ADA service animals, any animal (though usually a dog), is considered a service animal if it helps the person perform a necessary function that he or she can't perform (or can't perform reasonably well).

In addition to the seeing-eye dog, I know they can be used for balance and certain epileptics employ them (although I'm not sure if it is for early alert--supposedly dogs can sense the onset of an epileptic episode--or for seeking out help. Dogs and other animals can be trained to contact emergency services). While the most common animal is a dog, I've seen people using miniature ponies and I recall, anecdotally, that some use monkeys (ponies and most species of monkeys far outlive large dog breeds, making the extensive and expensive training needed a better investment).

The problem here is that, as far as I've read, the animal must be some sort of rescue animal or else compensate for a bodily function the disabled person lacks (balance, sight, hearing, etc.).

Provided she can get ADA status, the local health department's ruling that the monkey isn't a service animal isn't controlling (pesky Supremacy Clause).

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:34 AM

Am I the only one who thinks this is an absolutely fascinating case?

The IIED would fail, IMO. This is hardly a traditional torts case, and the capriciousness of requiring a monkey (yes, a monkey) for emotional well-being doesn’t make any sense to a reasonable person.

The NEID is similarly tricky. Again, it’s a monkey. NEID claims are flimsy even without that additional tidbit.

Are there other claims?

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:39 AM

Social anxiety disorder is a real disability. I spent weeks and weeks in my house because of it. Or maybe it was because the people one of my law school classes scared me. I'm not really sure.

Also, seeing as how the area she is from isn't very large and/or diverse (in thought and human capital), I highly doubt there were a lot of other macaque owners walking around. They are picking on the poor, strange woman. And Dick. He has feelings too!

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:40 AM

Pray...for...Mojo.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:43 AM

"Also, seeing as how the area she is from isn't very large and/or diverse (in thought and human capital), I highly doubt there were a lot of other macaque owners walking around. They are picking on the poor, strange woman."

It's. A. Monkey. Are you kidding me? The lack of diversity buttresses the argument that they were genuinely puzzled by the monkey and didn't see it as reasonable.

No reasonable person would argue that a monkey helps you overcome a mental illness. If anything, it serves to reinforce that illness. The fascinating part is that, according to her, it did. So what do we do now?

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:52 AM

WGWBM?

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:53 AM

/ cringe with shame at article

Signed,

MO Atty. ATL reader

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:54 AM

"From Chimpan A- to chimpanze you've finally made a monkey out of me! "

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:55 AM

This case is rediculous. The defendants should probably try to get it removed to federal court.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:56 AM

I'm still in shock that this macaque brought down George Allen's reelection bid... and a credible run to be the next President...

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:58 AM

Correction to 10:54

McClure: I hate every chimp I see, from chimpan-A to chimpan-Z, no you'll never make a monkey out of me.

[Wrecked Statue of Liberty appears]

McClure: Oh my gosh, I was wrong! It was Earth all along. You've finally made a monkey...

Chorus of monkeys: Yes, we've finally made a monkey...

All: You've finally made a monkey out of meeeeeee!

McClure: I love you, Dr. Zaius!

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 10:59 AM

10:40, nice work.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:04 AM

10:55: I like how you dismiss cases without analyzing them.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:04 AM

Doctor Zaius, Doctor Zaius,

Doctor Zaius, Doctor Zaius,

Doctor Zaius, Doctor Zaius,

Doctor Zaiiiiuuuuuus!

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:06 AM

What is ridiculous is the fact that someone posting to a legal blog and opining about removal jurisdiction actually thinks "ridiculous" is spelled "rediculous."

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:06 AM

"Your dad used to be as smart as a monkey, then his mind started gettin' lazy and now he's as dumb as a chimp."

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:09 AM

Better movie...?

Apes-A-Poppin
or
Hail to the Chimp

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:09 AM

Mmm, I can't wait to eat that monkey!

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:09 AM

I'm disappointed by the quality of legal analysis on this thread.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:13 AM

10:12 - how could White & Case no-offered their summers already? It's only mid-July.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:13 AM

You said this monkey would be sweeping the floors and cleaning the gutters. And now, he just lies there, struggling to breathe!

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:15 AM

To 11:13...

What do you expect? His cholesterol is through the roof!

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:15 AM

What would be the advantage of removal jurisdiction? I haven't taken CivPro yet.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:21 AM

11:15 -

None. SW MO juries are fairly conservative - good place to be sued. This nut would get $0 awarded, and would lose on a motion for attorneys' fees.

Signed,

MO Atty. ATL reader

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:22 AM

THAT "FILTHY MONKEY" MADE THE ORANGE JUICE YOU'RE DRINKING

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:24 AM

Stop that! You're a helper monkey! This isn't helping!

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:27 AM

To 11:15 (1):

I want you to take that monkey back, so he can be rehabilitated and get a second chance.

~11:13

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:29 AM

11:21: so they think that a federal jury may be more forgiving?

The depositions could be funny.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:47 AM

I'm outraged that teh Walmart discriminates against Macacas.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:49 AM

And here I have 1000 monkeys typing at a 1000 typewriters...soon they will have written the best novel known to man.

[Burns grabs page from smoking monkey's typewriter]

It was the best of times it was the BLURST of times?? you stupid monkey!

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:55 AM

11:13: Just a rumor. A bunch of the summer associates were talking about it. White & Case also had a summer class that was much larger than the previous one (114 vs. 40?). So, 15 no offers would not be a surprise especially since the economy is tanking. Anyway, I have no hard sources, figured this would be the place for some confirmation.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:56 AM

11:13: Just a rumor. A bunch of the summer associates were talking about it. White & Case also had a summer class that was much larger than the previous one (114 vs. 40?). So, 15 no offers would not be a surprise especially since the economy is tanking. Anyway, I have no hard sources, figured this would be the place for some confirmation.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 11:58 AM

All the Simpsons quotes are hilarious! Keep them coming...

11:09 - you are a douche

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 12:09 PM

No, no, he's fine! Go on, Mojo! Show Marge your happy dance!

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 12:20 PM

That picture definitely = Family Guy closet monkey

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 12:22 PM

11:09(3) - yes you are a douche par excellance!

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 12:39 PM

They should put her to sleep.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 1:03 PM

McClure: Get your hands off me, you filthy ape!

Apes: He can talk he can talk he can talk he can talk...

McClure: I can siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing!!!

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 1:03 PM

The threshold question is the legitimacy of having this kind of monkey as a treatment for social anxiety disorder. Who prescribed it, or did the patient simply tell her psychiatrist "Having Dick on my shoulder helps me go out in public" and the shrink says "Ok. Works for me. That'll be $200 for the session." Is it scientifically proven that having a macaque on your shoulder can mitigate the effects of this disorder?

What's the difference from a psychological perspective between having a monkey on your shoulder to help with social anxiety disorcer and walking around naked in public to help with the same? What if some guy believes his clothes make him socially unacceptable, so he can only go out in public if he's naked? Is he going to sue Wal-Mart too when they refuse to let him in? What if a person needed to have a skunk on their shoulder to overcome some psychological disorder? How about a jellyfish?

And, are macaques specifically trained for this type of assistance work? Like dogs for the blind? Is this monkey certified to sit on this lady's shoulder and make her feel OK to be in public? Do they train this monkey so that this gal can say a code word and the monkey will jump off and scratch the eyes out of a person who exacerbates her social anxiety? If not, why not?

This raises so many questions.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 1:08 PM

Monkey hate clean!
http://www.vidstogo.com/player.php?vfname=bathroommonkey&ext=wmv

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 1:49 PM

9:36,

If someone agrees with you, they are dumb. Kash was just using the common English convention - "they" and its inflections for the ungendered singular gender-generic.

As linguist Henry Churchyard documents, the usage "actually dates back to at least the 14th century, and was used by the following authors (among others) in addition to Jane Austen: Geoffrey Chaucer, Edmund Spenser, William Shakespeare, the King James Bible, The Spectator, Jonathan Swift, Daniel Defoe, Frances Sheridan, Oliver Goldsmith, Henry Fielding, Maria Edgeworth, Percy Shelley, Lord Byron, William Makepeace Thackeray, Sir Walter Scott, George Eliot [Mary Anne Evans], Charles Dickens, Mrs. Gaskell, Anthony Trollope, John Ruskin, Robert Louis Stevenson, Walt Whitman, George Bernard Shaw, Lewis Carroll, Oscar Wilde, Rudyard Kipling, H. G. Wells, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Edith Wharton, W. H. Auden, Lord Dunsany, George Orwell, and C. S. Lewis."

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 2:22 PM

Henry Churchyard may be a linguist, but he is not a cunning one.
Chaucer, Spenser, Shakespeare = TTT

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 3:32 PM

I talk about this on my blog at rottenzucchini.com/2008/07/monkeying-with-our-legal-system/

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 3:56 PM

332: I talk about you on my blog

TTTdouchelawyers.com

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 18, 2008 4:54 PM

From my (limited) ADA knowledge, if the monkey is a legitimate service animal - then it's no problem. The issue is normally whether the animal is actually a service animal or not. This generally requires a showing that the animal has had some sort of training that sets it apart from other animals. You can't just declare that the monkey helps you - the monkey has to be trained in some way to give assistance.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 19, 2008 2:44 AM

NYC to helper monkeys!

Post Your Comment