Add RSS RSS

Trading Places: At NYU Law, A Clash Over Classes for Cash

Trading Places movie poster Dan Aykroyd Eddie Murphy.jpgTrading Places: it's no longer just a great eighties flick. It's what some NYU Law School students were trying to do, for cash -- until the administration got wind of it, and cracked down.

Several tipsters forwarded us this email:

To: All Students

From: Liam Murphy, Vice Dean [FN1]

Re: Buying and Selling Places in Classes

Date: July 22, 2008

I have received reports of students offering to buy or sell places in classes that closed during the recent registration lottery. (The seller and the buyer agree on a time when the class will be dropped by the seller and requested by the buyer.)

New York University Law School NYU Law School Above the Law.JPGI write to remind you that trading class spots for money or goods, or offering to do so, is a violation of law school rules. Places in law school classes are not the property of the enrolled student. Sanctions will be imposed on any seller of a class place and any student who buys a place from another student will be withdrawn from the class.

This deplorable practice will, fortunately, become a thing of the past when the School of Law's new registration system comes online for the 2009-2010 academic year. In the meantime, I urge you to behave responsibly and respect the integrity of our efforts to allot classes to students in a fair and proper manner.

C'mon, Dean Murphy -- don't you teach contracts? Isn't this a learning experience? Why are you cracking down on a bunch of enterprising law students who are applying law-and-economics principles to their daily lives?

The reactions of some students:

"In the frenzy over registration here at NYU, some students are offering cash for classes. Apparently, the school only likes it when it's getting paid for the privilege."

"[T]hought it would be interesting post to see whether folks out there can make a cogent argument that places in law school classes are the property of the enrolled student. Not your typical post, but perhaps might be fun."

We agree -- it could be interesting. Have at it, in the comments. Thanks.

[FN1] Hubba-hubba! This Dean Murphy is pretty cute. And he's Australian, so he probably has one of those sexy Aussie accents. It's too bad he was not yet a dean at the time of ATL's Law School Dean Hotties Contest.

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:37 PM

These crackers are making me FIRSTY.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:39 PM

Lat,

It is my opinion as a straight dude, that your taste in guys is terrible.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:40 PM

So Lat is gay, right? "Not that there's anything wrong with that!" Oh how I love Seinfeld!

Whether gay or not, he's got pretty bad taste in men if he thinks that Aussie Dean is "pretty cute."

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:43 PM

New York Law School doesn't have a waitlist for classes? They are TTT.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:43 PM

"Looking good, Billy Ray!"
"Feeling good, Louis!"

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:45 PM

Will a new registration system really stop people from trading cash for classes? Bull. The new system will only set a different initial allocation. There will always be overdemand for certain classes. What the school needs is an online add/drop database so people can coordinate among themselves without flooding the law school listserve with annoying requests.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:45 PM

LiLo is dating a girl!

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:47 PM

Australian accents are not sexy.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:48 PM

Is there really a "law school rule" that says that you can't sell your seat in a class? Or is he just claiming that this activity fits in one of those vague "do not participate in inappropriate conduct" rules that most schools have?

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:49 PM

So you cant trade cash for a class, but what about sexual favors?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:51 PM

Seriously, Lat's gay, right? After that comment about the dean...

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:51 PM

Turn the machines back on!!!

13 Posted by t14lawDOTblogspot | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:52 PM

I don't think "deplorable" is the adjective I would have used.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:54 PM

Nothing new here--the same practice cropped up 3 or 4 years ago when I was at NYU, and it met with a similar school-wide email rebuke from another sub-dean (Barry Adler, another contracts prof). The registration system has been outdated and frustrating for years.

Lat is right though: Liam is, in fact, totally dreamy. And all critics (and annoying straight guys) should stand down.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:55 PM

The law school presumably pays more for better teachers, why can't the students pay more for better classes?

Maybe there should be a system where people register in order of class rank? (Cue Flamewar)

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:55 PM

the issue is not whether a place in the class is the student's property. student A has a limited right to attend class (limited, that is, by academic good standing requirements, etc), which he won fair and square through the lottery and which he paid for with his tuition money. you can think of it as a lease of a place in the class, if the idea of an absolute ownership right offends you. student B wasn't so lucky, but really wants to attend and is willing to sublease the spot. allowing B to do this ensures that the class will be populated with people who really want to be there, which is a good thing.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:55 PM

It tells time simultaneously in Monte Carlo, Beverly Hills, London, Paris, Rome, and Gstaad!!!

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:56 PM

This post is so BTR - this issue has come up (including the sexual favors) every year for at least 7 years at NYU Law.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:00 PM

To 12:55(3) / #17:

I'm sorry, but... "In Philadelphia, it's worth 50 bucks"

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:03 PM

I don't know how any of you can waste time thinking about this stuff when BATMAN was arrested today in London!

Sheesh.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:03 PM

The students aren't buying class spots. Student B is paying Student A to withdraw from class at a specified time. Student B then enrolls in the class immediately thereafter. Student A's obligations under the contract are limited only to withdraw at the time specified. It's absolutely a proper contract that shouldn't run afoul of any rules. It could also be done in a different manner. Assume that the class in question meets MW at 10:30 in classroom 100. Student B could pay Student A to not be in classroom 100 on MW at 10:30. Student A would then drop the class because it conflicts with his schedule.

Let's see some enterprising NYU students blatantly inform the school they're doing this, and then file a pro se lawsuit if they're sanctioned for it.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:06 PM

12:49, 12:56 - Is there a hierarchy of sexual favors, depending on how in-demand the class is?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:06 PM

In my law school's online registration system (the only way to register), when a class closed it would not re-open automatically. Students were directed to add their names to an electronic wait-list. A report is provided to the registrar a couple times a day and he would notify students that a spot opened up and give them one day to respond to accept it, and the registrar would put the students into the class. One of the effects of this is that you couldn't do things like coordinate drops/adds for your friends, which would create an exploitable market as is available at NYU right now.
Market economy rules all.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:07 PM

The buyer is not paying for the class. They are paying for the service of another person dropping the class to give them an opportunity to add the class. It is possible that someone else could be a free-rider, learn of the deal and add before the buyer. The seller could still collect because it is the buyer's risk at that point.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:10 PM

look at that S Car Go!

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:11 PM

subtledig.com outed lat already

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:11 PM

What if the students should have offered NYU a 15% cut?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:12 PM

What if the students should have offered NYU a 15% cut?

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:13 PM

Penelope, I am NOT an angel dust dealer!

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:17 PM

how much do these classes go for anyway?

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:29 PM


I don't know, but it's telling of the school's priorities (making money, maintaining status quo) that they're wasting energy preventing people from getting into classes they really want instead of offering more sections of popular classes.

NYU creates the scarcity by not having enough seats in classes students want. NYU makes them register months in advance, so it could create new class sections, but instead creates scarcity and then acts surprised when high demand for low supply results in premium pricing.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:29 PM

30 - I got into Secured Transactions for a quick rim-job in a library bathroom.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:33 PM

1:03 -- 5 points for another surprisingly cogent argument on ATL

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:35 PM

This is cap-and-trade at its finest.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:39 PM

Its not that big a deal. People sell classes at UVA all the time.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:39 PM

The issue is not about property (of course students have no property right to a class) but about efficiency. Spots in good classes are scarce resources, and anyone who has taken econ 101 will tell you that the best way to allocate scarce resources is with prices, not blind lotteries. You can go ahead and file this whole thing under "Why middling bureaucrats and attempts at fairness and central planning are usually worse than markets and prices" (my editor is making me shorten some of my chapter titles, as you can see).

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:39 PM


Exactly right, 34. Artificial scarcity, a bureaucracy decides who gets which "free" credits, and then it restricts who can buy and sell so that it can straddle the market and take cuts on every deal. All that's missing is for NYU to run the post-registration class auction.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:41 PM

I'm assuming that friends could coordinate drop/adds, so why can't people assign monetary value? This isn't prostitution, people.

I think that law school registration (which was a nightmare in my day '99-'02) should work like firm interview registration (if it doesn't already): Students are given a set number of credits that they can use to match with classes. That way they can ensure that they will get the ones that they want -- not just have the fastest network connection and wait in the holding pen until the system opens (like it worked when I was registering).

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:43 PM

"Cash for class" definitely happens at UVA, at least for Leslie classes. I've heard of $300 or more being exchanged to get into a Leslie class.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:44 PM

It's not luck, Todd.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:46 PM

re: 35 -

Last year, an enterprising 2L built a website, classwatcher.com, for UVA Law students to monitor the course enrollment system, LawReg, for open spots in designated classes. For $20, you could watch up to three classes (an additional fee per class beyond three). The system would send you an e-mail and/or text message as soon as a spot became available, so that you could log on and grab it. He even limited the number of people who could "watch" a particular class to 10% of the class's total enrollment so as not to dilute the utility of the service.

Apparently, the administration did not like this and changed the security settings of LawReg so that he could not run the site again this year, but that's just what I've heard.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:51 PM

How much are the classes being sold for?

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:52 PM

Can anyone fill us in on exactly what classes are so in demand at NYU that there is a surfeit of students banging down doors and willing to pay for the opportunity to get in?
I ask this because getting into even the most popular corporate classes, in fact any popular class, in my school is not even an issue. Yes, the most popular classes tend to be booked solid in the first period of pre-registration (on-line), but then as far as I know, the procedure at the beginning of the semester in question is just to show up for the class, and beg the teacher to be let in....I can't say I have ever heard of a student at my school not being able to get into an elective class, and we have a lot fewer professors than NYU has.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:53 PM

There are no winners in this debate-- the NYU administration are a bunch of douches for trying to put a stop to the system, and the NYU students are a bunch of douches for actually paying money for classes. Just how much are we talking about anyway? Fucking gunners.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:54 PM

Eddie Murphy. From this to Meet Dave in only 25 years.

ya bastid.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:57 PM


Exactly right, 34. Artificial scarcity, a bureaucracy decides who gets which "free" credits, and then it restricts who can buy and sell so that it can straddle the market and take cuts on every deal. All that's missing is for NYU to run the post-registration class auction.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:57 PM


Exactly right, 34. Artificial scarcity, a bureaucracy decides who gets which "free" credits, and then it restricts who can buy and sell so that it can straddle the market and take cuts on every deal. All that's missing is for NYU to run the post-registration class auction.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:58 PM


Exactly right, 34. Artificial scarcity, a bureaucracy decides who gets which "free" credits, and then it restricts who can buy and sell so that it can straddle the market and take cuts on every deal. All that's missing is for NYU to run the post-registration class auction.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:04 PM


So is 34 exactly right or what?


I'd have paid a few hundred to get into classes and sections I actually wanted. It would have made my schedule better and, if I'd chosen wisely, probably helped my GPA a bit. I was already paying $30k+/year for classes I didn't want, so what's another $2-$3k if I actually get what I want for it?

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:06 PM

26:

Crediting subtledig.com with outing Lat is like crediting me for outing Elton John by writing this comment.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:07 PM

37, 46, 47, 48: I am embarrassed to be associated with you.

- #34

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:08 PM

Will you be gettin' off at the city of brotherly love, Mr. Beaks?

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:24 PM

I took a couple of classes from Prof Murphy when I was at NYU. Definite Aussie accent and lots of girls thowing themselves at him. I don't know if he's ever caught any.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:28 PM

Wow, this comments thread is sad.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:28 PM

He's wearing my HARVARD tie.. like oh sure, he went to HARVARD..

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:36 PM

Dean Murphy ain't dreamy, he is dreamin'. If the SEC can barely put a dent on insider trading on public markets, how is the dean ever going to regulate a private one...with no proof that the transaction was of the offending, and not innocent, sort.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:37 PM

I bet this practice will continue regardless of the Dean. Who wants to take me up on it for, say, one dollar?

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:43 PM

the usual amount?

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:15 PM

If NYU was smart they would charge a premium for its most popular courses sort of the way the Yankees charge a premium for seats when they play the Red Sox, Mets, etc. Just think of the increased revenue stream.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:52 PM

43: survey of securities regulation with choi is in high demand. i've personally offered money and goods/services to get in. am also trying to get into professional responsibility in law and business (go figure).

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:22 PM

Zeta Chi,
Zeta Chi, my friend
'Neath the elms we sing our tones
We're brothers to the end

Muffy in the bathroom stall
Margaret by the lake
Susan down in Whitsley Hall
Constance on the make

Constance Fry,
Constance Fry,
Anytime you'd call
Constance would fulfill your needs,
Winter, Spring, or Fall.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:21 PM

SNITCHES GET STITCHES. NYU STUDENTS STOP SNITCHING.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:50 PM

I'm one of the NYU kids that offered money for a class slot - I did it as a way of civil disobedience, showing the administration to what lengths their shit system has driven us. FIGHT THE POWER. What would Thoreau do?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:03 PM

what an arcane system of class registration. its pretty funny that very smart people are being held hostage to an administration seemingly filled with idiots. and how can this registration system have been going on for years?

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:12 PM

64, I'd love to know that. Example: I gave the registration system a pretty well-done "lottery ticket," with a couple seminars and a couple lecture classes highly-ranked to, I thought, guarantee me a spot. Result: three seminars. You can only take two per semester. Win, NYU. Win.

If I find out that my spot went to 2Ls, heads are gonna roll.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:21 PM

Here's the solution. If you sign up for a lottery for a class and you get in, you can't withdraw from the class, or there is a penalty, like say, $300. That will stop douches from signing up for classes just so they can sell their spot, and that will ensure that wishy-washy students don't sign up for classes unless they really want to be in that class.

And if somebody REALLY wants to be in a class that badly, they can pay the $300 plus whatever premium to be in a class.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:14 PM

41:

That explains why I got beat out for all the classes I wanted last year.

UVA 3L

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:24 PM

This isn't law-and-economics, it's just economics. Nice try.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:40 AM

Ultimately, it's the rich kids' mommies and daddies who are paying for the spots. That's why the system sucks. If you're actually trying to limit your costs in law school, you don't have money to pay to get into classes.
And Liam Murphy is dreamy. That picture doesn't do him justice. Unless times have changed, though, he's happily married.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:24 AM

Exactly right, 34. Artificial scarcity, a bureaucracy decides who gets which "free" credits, and then it restricts who can buy and sell so that it can straddle the market and take cuts on every deal. All that's missing is for NYU to run the post-registration class auction.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:24 AM

Exactly right, 34. Artificial scarcity, a bureaucracy decides who gets which "free" credits, and then it restricts who can buy and sell so that it can straddle the market and take cuts on every deal. All that's missing is for NYU to run the post-registration class auction.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:25 AM

Exactly right, 34. Artificial scarcity, a bureaucracy decides who gets which "free" credits, and then it restricts who can buy and sell so that it can straddle the market and take cuts on every deal. All that's missing is for NYU to run the post-registration class auction.

Post Your Comment