Add RSS RSS

Alternative Dispute Resolution By Frat Stud?

side taker adr.jpgSideTaker.com might be the best example of schadenfreude ever created.

It is ostensibly a form of alternative dispute resolution for divorcing or generally unhappy couples. The concept is pretty simple. A disgruntled lover pays a $12 fee and posts his or her grievance on the website. Then he/she invites their partner to do the same. Once the two sides are online, random strangers weigh in on the dispute and vote over a 60 day period for who should prevail.

Obviously the results are not legally binding in any way (not unlike the modern day marriage certificate).

Legal Blog Watch reports that the site’s creators think they are doing some sort of service for the benefit of these couples:

Some are just, but far too many divorces, break ups, and separations happen over non-critical disputes. Over 50% of American marriages end in divorce. In a fight, each person has their side and are usually backed by their friends (on either side). When you can create a jury of anonymous peers to decide who is right or wrong in an argument, then the bias is gone and the person at fault will just have to suck it up.

I can’t imagine hating a woman enough to subject our relationship to the scathing critique of anonymous commenters. I think it’d be more humane just to throw some arsenic in the morning coffee and be done with it.

Wisdom from Side Taker’s “jury” after the jump.

Not surprisingly, marriage mediators do not immediately see the site’s value:

Mediation works not by telling one party or the other to “suck it up,” but by helping both parties find common ground.

But why strive (and pay) for common ground when any old person can clearly see obvious points like the ones already available on Side Taker:

Forget that stupid woman. She must have some serious mental issues. It sounds like she gets around a lot.
Or:
She has every right to hate you for what you did…but that doesn’t make her right for it. Things happen for a reason.

O brave new world, that has such people in’t.

With the Web, Who Needs Mediation? [Legal Blog Watch]
She Destroyed Me After 3 Years Together [Side Taker]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:54 PM

First!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:55 PM

Wow, what a horrible idea.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:58 PM

Hahahahaha. I will be frequenting this site.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:00 PM

Guys at my high school posted on sidetaker.com and they sucked, and so does EVERY OTHER FRAT STUD POSTING EVER.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:05 PM

Should be called sideofbeeftaker so Judge Halverson could resolve her marital cooking issues.

6 Posted by TTTroll | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:09 PM

Guys in my high school used to viciously mediate each other's disputes in public all the time. It was such a big deal that this one girl ate a whole bottle of sleeping pills.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:30 PM

The problem with this is that the side who best articulates their grievance will get a huge advantage. Thus rather than make their case on their own, each party should hire a lawyer to write their side of the story. For that reason the service is far more expensive than $12, or not very useful.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:33 PM

Isn't this basically blogging? In which case, 12 bucks for an audience ain't a bad deal.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:37 PM

This isn't a bad idea. Anonymous commentators are likely to be more neutral and their comments will allow the couples to see themselves more clearly.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:39 PM

I didn't think the concept _could_ exist, but this is a poor man's Jerry Springer. New. Low.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:41 PM

Yet another failure of a post from the esteemed EIC here.

Arsenic in the coffee...thats the best you can come up with? FOR SHAME.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:44 PM

This will just suck money out of people's pockets without providing a valuable service. So it'll probably be a winner.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:47 PM

Elie,

You earn your living by surfing the web and this is the *best* that you can give me mid-afternoon on a Monday in the first full week of September?

Suck.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:04 PM

This site will definitely prove the old internet adage:

normal person + anonymity + audience => total fuckwad

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:07 PM

14, that's not an "old internet adage." That's John Gabriel's Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory. Credit where credit is due.

http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19/

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:07 PM

uh, 14, i think ATL has proven that adage. see, eg, anything to do with halverson or TTT schools

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:14 PM

Elie to first degree murder!

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:29 PM

"his or her" is bullshit Elie. If you want to take a stand against sexist pronouns do it in a non-sexist way, otherwise just use "his." The default ordering principal is alphabetical, so a non-sexist phrasing would be "her or his." Putting the male pronoun first is considered sexism, not just habitual. It's also more cumbersome. But you would know that; you're a writer.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:44 PM

Dude, 18, I don't know what default rule you go by, I just order them whichever way sounds the best. Often it seems to flow in reverse alphabetical order, if anything. "Tom and Jerry", for instance, sounds better than "Jerry and Tom", while "Alicia and Mariah" sounds better than "Mariah and Alicia", though "Whitney and Cher" sounds better than "Cher and Whitney".

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:45 PM

18: are you serious? You have beef with "his" appearing before "hers"? If so, I am in utter shock that I even have to tell you what a total asshole you are.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 5:08 PM

Wow, these "correcting grammar and typo" losers were annoying, but 18 is in a new league of her/his own.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 5:43 PM

Wow, if the front lines of feminism have now advanced to the ordering of pronouns, we as a society must be near the promised land of total equality!!!! Because it does not get much more meaningless than that. It is not even symbolic, it is just totally and completely worthless.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 7:51 PM

“I can't imagine hating a woman enough to subject our relationship to the scathing critique of anonymous commenters.”—maybe. But remember this Your Tube video where a VERY angry wife trashed her soon to be ex in this YouTube video. (By the way we never had sex……)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx_WKxqQF2o

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 8:14 PM

Best website ever.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 10:49 PM

Seems like a lame-ripoff of www.whoiswrong.com which has been out for years

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 9, 2008 10:23 AM

18, you're retarded, right? His and her, objectively, is easier to say. the hard "s"and "d" allow an easy transition between "I" and "a" and between "n" and "e." "Her and his" requires the awkward "r" to "a" transition.

I hope you're just a troll and aren't really this angry/retarded.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 9, 2008 10:52 AM


This post should have had 100 comments easily. I feel cheated. What gives?

28 Posted by Pacific Reporter | Permalink Wednesday, January 7, 2009 1:21 PM

Sidetaker is the best website ever made, ever!

Post Your Comment