Add RSS RSS

Clerkshipship Advice Roundup

law clerk judicial clerkship Abovethelaw Above the Law blog.jpgOver the weekend, many readers and clerkship applicants opined that the federal hiring plan is, once again, FUBAR.

However, helpful advice for applicants also came in over the comments board and email. In anticipation of the today's noontime green flag, we bring you the best advice from your fellow ATL readers on how to handle the clerkship process.

Don't answer the phone, ever. A tipster wrote:

What you want to do is let the calls go to voicemail and then set up your interviews in order of your preference. That way, if you get an exploding offer in the room at the end of the first interview, it will be with the judge that you really want.

But don't be an idiot and change your cell phone. One tipster that thankfully overcame a massive brain freeze reports:

Calls were supposed to go out on the 11th, and on the 10th, I finally decided that my old cell phone was a POS and was going to use my summer associate $$$ for an iPhone. As the Fall progressed, I kept having trouble calling certain folks with my new phone. I could call them, they couldn't call me. Finally, I figure out that when I switched phones, there was a glitch that prevented a certain percentage of my calls from actually reaching me. D'oh.

Remember: the people you're replacing don't know their don't know their Lexis from their Nexis. As one commenter points out:

Don't get discouraged. If the phone doesn't ring on the first day, that's not always a bad thing.... Us clerks just got on the job and we don't want to start looking for our replacements just yet. I'm still trying to figure out the phones.

More tips from the readers after the jump.

It's a marathon, not a sprint. Numerous people pointed out that their judges didn't start interviewing in earnest until February.

When you snag an interview, don't just ramble on about the wonderful experience of clerking. The more specifics, the better. This should be obvious, but it's a basic tip to remember.

Don't prestige-whore yourself straight into misery. The most prestigious judge / clerkship may not be the best fit for you. From an email:

Depending on your judge and their workload, you could find yourself putting in nearly the same number of hours as a BigLaw associate for a fraction of the pay. If you cast your geographic net wide, you could find yourself in a strange city. Relationships can fail and friends will be area codes, if not time zones away. What might be best for your professional development might not be best for your mental health.

Good luck, clerkship applicants. Whatever happens, it can't be as bad as being a member of the 2008 summer associate class, right?

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:52 AM

First?

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:54 AM

And Second?

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:54 AM

Followed by, Third?

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:55 AM

Haha, two in a row, I rule, this is the best day EVER!

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:57 AM

Well...we won the Bronze!

-3

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:58 AM

Current clerk. I am glad to be on this side of this whole bloody mess.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:59 AM

The advice not to answer your phone is only for those people who expect to get multiple interviews and are highly sought after. If you're a bit more average, PICK UP THE PHONE. A number of clerks go right down a list, and once they have scheduled all the interview slots, they stop. Often they don't leave messages. If they do leave a message, there's still a chance that by the time you call them back, there will no longer be an interview slot for you. That happened to a friend of mine -- he was so psyched, and then it was all over.

So, don't be cocky. I was top 40% at CLS, am working at a top 25 biglaw firm, and didn't get a single clerkship interview. Pick up the d@mn phone.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:03 PM

7:
Your problem was that you were top 40%. No one outside the top 25% bubble, even in tier 2 schools, likely gets selected to interview, unless you have other exceptional credentials, journals, publications, and great prior work experience (i.e., summer associate position).

Also, pick up the phone people!!

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:04 PM

I thought they weren't allowed to call us under the federal plan until the 11th? Did that change? Our career services is absolute shit.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:10 PM

Here's the best piece of advice from my chambers...Do NOT be too quirky with the "interests" section of your resume. I know that career services will try to warn you that generic interests are worthless. But, at the same time, don't put down anything too obscure or ridiculous.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:13 PM

Grad applicant here. Is it inappropriate to contact chambers and inquire about your application (which was sent out in mid-summer)?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:14 PM

10 - Absolutely! I can't believe how many resumes I reviewed that had, "Japanimation" and "Christain outreach" in their interests section.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:15 PM

Only happens to GULCers.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:15 PM

#8, I know my GPA wasn't good -- although I did have a few of things you listed -- and that getting a clerkship was only a distant hope. My point is that there are very few people who are sought after by the judges, so only very few people can cavalierly let their calls go to voicemail. It just seemed that it was inappropriate for ATL to be handing out advice that doesn't work for the majority of clerkship applicants. I mean, come on, how many Yale Law Review types have the time to read this blog anyway? Most readers need to pick up their phone. And if the first caller is a Magistrate Judge you accidentally applied to, you should still schedule the interview, because you don't know if that might be the only call you get.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:16 PM

Remember: Jimmy Two Times says, "I'm gonna go get the papers, get the papers."

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:17 PM

don't contact chambers about your specific application. in our chambers it's "don't call us / we'll call you."

it is probably okay to call just to see if the judge has hired or is interviewing (staying anonymous). but, we'd be annoyed if you called about your individual application. we have a lot of them, and i think you'd be hurting your chances if you called.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:18 PM

Reading the interests section was always my favorite part. My advice, do not include an interests / hobbies section. It's ridiculous.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:19 PM

Just got a call from Judge Phelan in Baltimore! My dream clerkship!

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:20 PM

To follow up on #10, as a piece of advice from my interview -- if you put down wine tasting society, be prepared to discuss the state of the law with respect to interstate wine sales. All the clerks I met were total d!cks. In a biglaw interview, the conversation would be more like, "Oh, you like to drink? I like to drink too. We drink a lot here." So, be prepared to discuss anything on your resume in depth.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:22 PM

how long will calls go on...
if you havent gotten called yet are you likely not going to get anything

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:24 PM

Just got my first call!!! I can only pray that I get a few more. Good luck everyone

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:29 PM

been half an hour and no calls yet--Am i sunk?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:29 PM

yes, 22. Give up...

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:32 PM

#9: the 11th is the first day interviews can be held. Today is the first day judges can call you to schedule interviews.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:34 PM

thanks 24

-9

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:35 PM

9 you are an idiot

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:38 PM

Three calls already. Apparently federal judges don't care that I'm not at a T15 school. HA!

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:39 PM

thanks 24

-Kiefer Sutherland, multimillionaire many times over thanks to that wonderful show

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:40 PM

edva in norfolk, or dmd in baltimore. thoughts?

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:41 PM

thanks 24

-John Yoo, on the inspiration for his OLC torture memo

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:42 PM

Judge Halverson called me today and offered me a clerkship in Nevada without an interview! I'm so excited! She said the first case I get to work on is a battery, too!

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:43 PM

or, more germane to this federal clerkships thread:

thanks 24

-Jay Bybee, after signing off on the Yoo memo

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:44 PM

Norfolk has some nice tree-lined residential parts and you can probably live cheaply among Navy folks. Baltimore is kind of a pit, and the parts where young professionals probably want to live (Canton, etc.) are expensive for what they are.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 12:46 PM

ED Va!

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:05 PM

SDNY!!!

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:14 PM

isn't edva the "rocket docket"? personally, i'd steer clear if you have other options.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:14 PM

31 -- did your resume's interest section include "green eggs and ham"? It may have been misconstrued . . .

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:14 PM

D Conn??

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:18 PM

27: Credentials?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:23 PM

27 - whats your stats?

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:23 PM

"Clerkshipship Advice Roundup"??? Seriously, Elie? Are you honestly making typos in the TITLE of posts now???

Unless, of course, you're referring to a sailing vessel full of clerkships?

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:26 PM

16 is right on. Don't call chambers about your application. 17 is wrong - interests can be, well, interesting.

-clerk looking through apps

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:33 PM

Hey 42
get back to work you asshole, we are sweating it out waiting for your jackass to tell the judge who to offer interviews to

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:36 PM

27's stats are: varsity letter in lying.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:36 PM

27 here:
Top 10, published on the law review at a top 40 school. Three interviews with federal judges already.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:37 PM

44 seems to have a varsity letter in jealousy.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:37 PM

36,

Why steer clear of the rocket docket? Things move quickly, and you see a lot over the course of the year.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:38 PM

27:

District Court or CoA?

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:42 PM

Anyone besides 27 getting calls?

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:42 PM

27 again:

District, obviously. I would be too busy crapping my pants to post here if they were CoA.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:43 PM

27 -
that better be top 10 people not top ten percent
cause getting published in a top 40 law review is worth about jack shit now....
no ones cares about those shitty notes at American
or else you are lying, or have some great connection

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:43 PM

Do any judges wait until the afternoon to call? Or is it over already?

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:58 PM

it's over already.

serves you right for throwing frisbees when you live in a glass house.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:58 PM

I am top of the class at non-top 40 school + law review, etc. No calls here so far. Anyone know where else we can track which positions have been offered already?

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:58 PM

Which judge is the best to clerk for if you want to work in Bratislava afterward??

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 1:59 PM

I was thinking that Hawaii isn't even awake yet - perhaps there is still hope?

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:00 PM

54, if you google "Clerkship Notification Blog" it's a pretty good site to get some information about which judges have hired, which are calling, etc.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:01 PM

agreed with 54. Isn't there a website that tracks which Judges have made interview offers yet? I am in the same boat....no calls yet. Yikes.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:03 PM

top 1% at T40, law review, good work exp, applied to 200+ COAs - no calls... guess I shoud've taken that LSAT perp course. i was nieve.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:05 PM

Naive - 59

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:06 PM

When is it appropriate to start trying to parlay other interviews? Now?

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:07 PM

Everybody needs to chill out. It's not over yet. Not by a long shot.

-Current COA and former dist ct clerk.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:10 PM

62- as someone who has made the phone calls offering interviews, would you say it is completely dependent on each individual judge? What time line should we be expecting here?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:13 PM

I just did a quick look and most big states have almost no reports yet - maybe this process will be longer than we all expect. Perhaps I should plan to leave the house today after all. OY

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:14 PM

Interview advice?? Interviewing way out of my league Thursday.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:15 PM

Most of the action will happen this week, and a fair bit of it will happen today. Bottom line: don't lose hope until week's end. And even then you still have a shot with some judges. Of course, I don't pretend to be some guru. I just remember being in your shoes and thought I'd share my experience.

-62

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:16 PM

65 - if you got the interview it is not out of your league - be confident, but not cocky and show you are "person" - this judge has to deal with you on a daily basis for a year.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:16 PM

If someone has a couple of COA interviews lined up but was no offered by one of their firms this summer, what can they expect in the interview?

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:19 PM

64: What do you mean have reports?

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:20 PM

59 -- to be fair, nieve is the "el/ella/usted" conjugation of "nevar" ("to snow"); so there may be a chance for you yet! don't let those Kaplan "perps" get you down!

-HTH

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:21 PM

64 here - I mean on that website you can look by state and no one is reporting much action (DC, NY, CA, etc.)

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:22 PM

In unrelated news, I'm an idiot. I meant first-person past preterite, of course ("I snowed"); not third person present tense.

-H"whoops"TH

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:24 PM

And I'm even more of an idiot (not to mention horribly rust with my spanish!). It's the noun for snow. 59, you ARE snow, so good luck!

-HTH

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:26 PM

70, 72, 73: A man after my own heart.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:27 PM

current clerk looking through resumes:

"Interests: [My Judge's Name and Judge's breed of dog]"

creeeepy

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:29 PM

I've gotten notification of one interview through email-no phone calls.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:35 PM

are people getting phone calls?

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:38 PM

Still no. Starting to feel sick to my stomach.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:39 PM

One via email, no calls.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:43 PM

Current clerk here. As for your quirky interests, chances are you'll look like 1) a freak, and 2) a freak without the professional judgement to leave that stuff at home. Don't get too cute on your resume. But, then again, I'm in a 2 year clerkship and don't want to diminish my entertainment next year . . . so, go for it, freaks! Write down all that weird stuff that you do that you seem to want to share with federal judges.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:45 PM

are the vast majority of the interviews calls/emails out by now?

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:52 PM

81 - Man, I really hope not

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 2:57 PM

Hey 80 -

When do you think most people will have heard by? When can we continue going about life and stop waiting by the phone? Should I be cutting classes here?

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:01 PM

Judges are still calling... I got a call at about 2:50.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:03 PM

Anyone hear from Texas Fed. Judges?

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:04 PM

please be more specific - what judges or what state are you hearing from?

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:08 PM

yeah, judges are still calling....
VA District Judges are still calling at least

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:09 PM

85 - i got one call from ED Tx this morning. that's all i've heard.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:14 PM

#83 -- you should be cutting classes today. cut tomorrow only if you can without consequence. for the remainder of the week, sit in the back with your phone on vibrate if you can.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:15 PM

88 - Thanks (and crap!)

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:32 PM

ED TN.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:32 PM

any recommendations if you literally can't be available the day that interviews start? I'm in court all day Thursday and Friday...appropriate to mention that to the person when they ask if you're available so they don't think you're delaying them?

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:33 PM

Current clerk again. So that no one has a heart attack at 5pm today, I thought I'd say, for example, that my judge is out of town and will not make calls until he returns in the next several days. And, why cut classes? Does anyone really think that getting your voice mail would change a federal judge's analysis of your candidacy so much as to ding you? You want to talk arbitrary and capricious . . .

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:36 PM

93--would you mind telling us which district/circuit?

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:36 PM

93--would you mind telling us which district/circuit?

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:37 PM

Do judges stop calling at 5/6pm? Or is all night fair game?

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:42 PM

#96, all night is fair game. They could call at 3am. To prepare for that possibility and so you don't sound groggy/stupid on the phone, you should drink 18 red bulls and pull consecutive all nighters until you get the call. We're pulling for you, buddy.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:47 PM

I know that some judges wait until later in the week/month/year to make calls, but is it safe to say that almost all Federa COA judges would have called at noon today?

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:48 PM

68: I had 3 clerkship interviews (2 SDNY, 1 DNJ) after getting no-offered as a summer. NO ONE asked.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 3:53 PM

98, I have no backing for this, but I don't think so. For example, one of the Circuits (think either the 8th or the 10th) had a conference this weekend so alot of the judges are travelling today and may have told their clerks not to make calls until they get back.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:00 PM

I clerked for Judge Dre in the Eastern District of Compton. He doesn't call applicants; he just shows up at their place with a ski mask and some teflon. If he robs them, that means they're hired. Better tell somebody.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:02 PM

Anyone hearing from 8th Circuit COA judges yet?

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:04 PM

How many applicants will a typical judge interview?

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:06 PM

Any word from 5th Circuit COA? Seems like a lot hired off plan and can't even keep track of judges still hiring.

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:07 PM

Advice on turning down an interview?

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:08 PM

The judge I'm clerking for in Bratislava abducted me in my sleep. I've been chained to the desk in his chambers for the past 3 years. I thought I only applied for a 2 year clerkship, but he tells me I'm wrong. I hope this ends soon, because my rear end is getting sore. At least this will look great on my resume when I apply for Wachtell's Bratislava office. I figure I'm a guaranteed hire.

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:19 PM

This is 93. I know this is rare on ATL, but my post was altruistic in nature. I tried to make people feel better about not getting calls today. As hard as this may be to believe from the other side, judges don't clear their schedules for call day. Trials still go on. Travel plans are not abandoned. And, judges may still be deciding who to call. Remember, many judges get about 500 applications (mine included).

I did not mean to throw chum into this feeding frenzy, but should have seen it coming. So, I will respectfully decline to post what district I'm in. I wish everyone good luck. I'm getting back to work.

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:20 PM

too . . . much . . . free . . . time . . .

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:28 PM

98--

Not at all.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:39 PM

Once you have an interview with a judge in your range, what are the odds? How many candidates does a typical dist ct judge interview?

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 4:58 PM

Has anyone out there been offered a clerkship and declined it? If so, please share your experience and reflections.

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 5:09 PM

500 applications for 2 clerkships! You've got to be kidding me.

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 5:09 PM

68 -- i got no-offered and still got a COA clerkship. my experience: i was asked about it in the interview. i said that i didn't get an offer but didn't try to make excuses for it. i provided names of references at that firm who i knew would provide positive feedback about my work. don't let it psych you out!

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 5:13 PM

You guys are lucky...I'd trade my V10 offer for a COA clerkship in a heartbeat.

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 5:17 PM

As a former federal clerk, I would encourage interviewees to ask the judge if they can try on his or her robes. If you're given the robes, put them on and prance around the judge's chambers singing "I'm a pretty princess, You Honor."

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 5:20 PM

top 10%, law review, 259 applications (on OSCAR), no calls today. Am I screwed?

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 5:22 PM

116 - What school?

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 6:01 PM

115 - up the meds.

116 - Yes.

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 6:09 PM

3 calls today between 11 and 11:20. 2 CoA and 1 district

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 7:23 PM

Looking at the clerkship notification blog, there are a ton of judges with no information coming out of today. Doesn't necessarily mean anything, but the optimist in me says that means alot of judges didn't place the highest priority on getting calls out today.

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 8:11 PM

Yo...anyone who writes "alot" as one word should be barred from clerking. Its two words people.

Practicing attorney here: had two interviews a few weeks back SDNY / EDPA. Still no word. (I figured I'd take me immediately, but...I'm not them. ;) So I'm still on hold.)

I've gotten letters / emails / calls over the past few months saying the judge would adhere to the hiring plan and wouldn't begin interviews till then. Guess no additional calls today means...what?

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 8:41 PM

121,

You shouldn't have had judges responding that they would adhere to the hiring plan -- the plan doesn't apply to grads. Is there some reason it wouldn't have been clear to them that you were applying as a grad?

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 8:56 PM

This is something I already posted on the clerkship notification blog (I don't think it applies to "this site," just this thread, and the idea of sharing clerkship info):

This is the problem with this site. No one is posting, even on the most active day of the year. I don't mean to disparage this site in particular. I think it's a great idea to host a central repository for clerkship info. At the same time, not everything that deters people from sharing this info in the first place is changed by having a central, accessible, anonymous site. Namely, I don't like sharing info here because, before apps are submitted, I jealously guard whatever insider information I have, and after apps are submitted, I don't want to run the risk, however small, of being identified based on the information I post. Anonymizing the information makes it less useful, and so gives me less of a reason (if I'm motivated by altruism, or anything like it) to share.


I might add that, while it's reassuring to have current clerks responding here, they also don't reveal any info that would be helpful to a candidate -- most obviously which circuit or which district their court is in.

avatar
124 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 9:20 PM

No calls/emails today from any fed courts in Cali - but now I don't have to pay to go out there, so Vegas here I come!!!

I am the big winner.

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 9:31 PM

121 here.

Communications from chambers have basically said that since they are adhering to the hiring plan, they wouldn't start interviewing (or in some cases reviewing clerkships) until now.

I'm at a large law firm in NYC, so it shouldn't have been unclear. But then again--I'm also a white guy from Howard who referenced that in my cover letter (to avoid confusion)...and yet the judge said at the outset of the interview that she thought she was bringing me in to comply with diversity requirements (yeah...we all know there aren't any for judges).

So...maybe judges don't read all those docs after all?

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 10:03 PM

No. 121: Question: I also am a grad. Did you tell your firm that you were applying for a clerkship? If not, who did you get to write rec letters for you? Law professors only? A senior associate at your firm? Whatever you did, it is working for you....any help would be great!

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 10:27 PM

Former DCT and COA clerk here. A fair number of judges do not even schedule interviews during first week or two, so there is still hope if you haven't been contacted yet. My experience is that most judges interview about 5-10 people for 2 or 3 spots. Good luck to all.

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 10:31 PM

Thanks, 127. I was curious about the interview to spot ratio.

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:00 PM

121: Anyone who uses the incorrect its/it's should also be banned from clerking. HTH.

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:15 PM

COA clerk here, made calls today. Will Here's some advice (seriously trying to help):

1-Answer your phone. We know that you know today is the day, so pick up. If you don't, by the time you call back I will have scheduled several more interviews. At best, you're a couple weeks out and realistically, fighting for our last spot.

2-DO NOT call chambers to see if we are still calling people. I had two people do that today. It makes you look like you just don't understand how someone as great as you hasn't made our list. If we plan to call you, but you call in asking about our calling status, we probably will just skip you when we get to your name. Be patient--after I narrowed it down by our criteria, I still went through more than 400 applications last week.

3-When I call you and ask you to hustle out to chambers for an interview Friday, say "ok, I'll be there." Unless you already have another interview that day or a serious family event, accept the interview then figure out how you'll get here. It may be a little costly, but didn't your career services people tell you to be ready to travel? People who hem and haw lose their place in line. And most judges ask how the applicant was on the phone, i.e., did she sound excited? Don't make me have to tell the judge that I offered you an interview, but it is three hours later and you're still trying to figure out whether you can travel this week.

All that said, the key is to be professional and eager to do the job. Most judges really aren't jerks or egomaniacs, but they do want to know that you appreciate the opportunity they are giving you.

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:21 PM

"If we plan to call you, but you call in asking about our calling status, we probably will just skip you when we get to your name"

It's nice to know that legal hiring is still ruled by arbitrary bullshit.

avatar
132 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:33 PM

130--if you're still around, part of the problem with "take Friday if offered Friday" advice is that sometimes you legitimately do have things you can't miss (court hearings for a client, for example). I'm assuming at that point it's safe to say that that's your other commitment but that you're free on X, Y, or Z date?

avatar
133 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:36 PM

131, it isn't arbitrary BS. If you think you are so great that you just can't understand why we haven't called you yet, you think a bit too much of yourself. Seriously, it's 3 pm and you call in asking if we were going to call you today? Do you really think you're that special?

avatar
134 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:42 PM

132, if you have something like that, just say so. Again, most of us are reporting to our judges on how the phone call went. If you tell me you have something for a client Friday, I'll undersand and tell the judge.

That being said, a lot of this happens really fast, and since Friday (12th) is a day lots of judges schedule interviews, keep it clear if you can. And only apply to judges you would be willing/able to travel to see.

Seriously, I really am trying to help. We get hundreds of apps and, even though it sounds harsh, if you aren't jumping on the opportunity, the next equally-qualified candidate will.

avatar
135 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 8, 2008 11:44 PM

Help! The Federal Almanac on the Judiciary, nor any other google resources, seem to have much info on the fed. district judge with whom I am interviewing on Thursday, even though he was appointed in 2003. What other resources are out there?

avatar
136 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 9, 2008 2:19 AM

If someone is calling chambers to ask if the judge is calling, it is probably because they really want to clerk for that judge and want to know if they still have a chance with your judge when evaluating other offers. It is not just arbitrary, but cruel, to skip over someone YOUR JUDGE wants because YOU are a pissy bitch about having to answer extra phone calls.

avatar
137 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 9, 2008 3:17 AM

Any thoughts from current clerks on calling chambers to say that you'll be in town for another interview? Does it come across as checking on your status, or is it fair game? I've head different things, but mostly from other applicants.

avatar
138 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 9, 2008 8:21 AM

137, my t10 strongly encourages it. I did it yesterday and no one I talked to seemed to at all have a problem with it.

avatar
139 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 9, 2008 9:43 AM

137, my school also encourages it. I was successful yesterday.

avatar
140 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 9, 2008 9:44 AM

137 - I got my EDVA clerkship that way.