Add RSS RSS

The Worst Law Firm Websites

Van%20Winkle%20Law%20Firm%20Lawyer%20Ken.jpgWachtell may be the most prestigious firm out there (according to Vault), but it has the industry’s worst Web site, as rated by Jonathan Thrope of the American Lawyer. We’re not completely sure we trust his judgment though, since he was “sucked in” by Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice’s animated dog. We waited for it to do something cool, but it just stretched and yawned.

According to Thrope, law firms are getting more serious about online marketing and using Web sites to create a distinctive brand. In general, law firm sites strike us as fairly dry. And boring. There are a few exceptions, like the Van Winkle Law Firm’s split personality bio page. North Carolina-based Van Winkle adds a personal touch to its site with dual bios (and photos) for many of its attorneys: one with professional highlights, and another focused on hobbies and life outside of work.

Other firms experiment with offbeat advertising, but seem to be using it to recruit attorneys, not clients. Like Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle’s creation of a Facebook page, and Stoel Rives’ free-style running promo on YouTube.

Of the assortment of staid sites in the AmLaw 100, five made Thrope’s cut for the worst. Check them out after the jump.

Here are Thrope’s top five stinkiest sites, along with two “dishonorable mentions.”

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz: Reminiscent of a seventh-grade history project.

Davis Polk & Wardell: Not much better than Wachtell’s. Simply a brochure placed online.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore: As one Web reporter described it, this site is Spartan. Associates don’t even get bios, and the attorneys that do have meager descriptions.

Pepper Hamilton: White space can sometimes be a good thing, but not when it makes up a third of your home page. Is something still loading?

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom: Skadden apparently thinks the Cold War is ongoing — and they’re on the side of the Soviets.

Dishonorable Mention: Sullivan & Cromwell and Kaye Scholer.

Since all of these firms continue to pull in the big clients, and big bucks, we have to assume that TTT sites are not detrimental in the legal business. Perhaps “dry and boring” are what clients want from Biglaw.

The Best and Worst of Am Law 100 Sites [American Lawyer]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:06 AM

I AM FIRST - SUCK IT!!!!!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:10 AM

Hate hate the Skadden website. It hurts my eyes.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:11 AM

another lame story

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:15 AM

It's power red!

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:19 AM

I bought an Oscar Meyer "Deli Creation" sandwich that was described as a "Chicken Bacon Ranch" sandwich. Turns out what they meant was chicken, along with bacon-flavored ranch. Absolutely disgusting. It doesn't even have real bacon flavor -- it tastes like bacon-bit-flavored ranch.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:23 AM

sixth

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:24 AM

How about a Seven & Seven anyone?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:29 AM

I *hate* the Cravath web site. The back button doesn't work, b/c the entire stupid thing is in Flash. People used to do that like eight years ago, and it was terrible then.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:29 AM

eight

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:29 AM

It feels GREAT to be number EIGHT

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:31 AM

In defense (sort of) of Pepper Hamilton's site, if you zoom in a lot, the columns line up properly. It looks like it was designed for 640x480 or 800x600 resolution or something, and hasn't been updated since. The Wayback Machine reveals that pepperlaw.com was updated to the current format in March, 2003, when people were just going over to flatscreens and Pepper was probably still using CRTs. Now everybody's looking at it on higher resolution flatscreens and it looks screwed up. It probably displays differently on Firefox and IE, too, I haven't checked.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:33 AM

It feels GREAT to be number EIGHT

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:37 AM

Wachtell's website is the height of respectability and dignity. They don't make fancy promises, use buzz-words, or display eager, satisfied clients shaking hands with middle-aged attorneys. Instead, they give you a modicum of information and let you gauge your interest without hype.

Frankly, I think it's the best legal website out there. Lawyers aren't management consultants, and the trend toward sounding and looking them needs to halt.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:38 AM

How about Fulbright & Jaworski. Yep. Website still doesn't load. Hasn't for four days now.

(And I had an on-campus interview one of those days and knew very little about my interviewers. That was great fun.)

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:40 AM

I like Strook's website. It says Strook everywhere. It makes you say Strook.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:42 AM

New York considers websites lawyer advertising which would explain the spartan nature of the websites.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:42 AM

14: lulz. What did you say to them? "So . . . I realize . . . that you do lots of . . . ugh . . . litigation work! Yeah, litigation. How's litigation at your work?"

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:44 AM

I agree with 13. There's no gimmicks devised by overpaid marketing department people or the ad firm they hire who are so proud of themselves for creating penguins or bowling games or other stupid crap that have nothing to do with the actual practice of law or what sets the firm apart. All it does is try to be cute.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:47 AM

18: the worst offender is a Wisconsin-based firm that I won't mention by name. Their website is like a stand-up comedy contest.

I'm sure that someone else is familiar with this big firm, or even works for them, but I won't spill the beans.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:48 AM

I've got PLENTY of TWENTY!

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:50 AM

19 here. Nevermind. It applies mostly to their careers section, which makes a lot of jokes.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:53 AM

How does Roy Davis not get a shout out?

http://www.vwlawfirm.com/attorneys/roydavisinfo.php

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:54 AM

Wisconsin is a joke. Not even GULCers venture there.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:58 AM

Wachtell's website is great. Attorneys don't need fancy, comprehensive bios to "prove" themselves. Collectively, the caliber of schools represented is remarkable in and of itself. Wachtell knows that and that's what's reflected on the site. That's what's important to some, if not most, big clients.

It's only when a firm hires attorney's from TTT schools does it need to write comprehensive bios about the attorney's Law Review membership, etc.

...

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:00 PM

twentyfithski!!!!!!

and #11, Pepper sucks almost as bas as it's website :)

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:00 PM

twentyfithski!!!!!!

and #11, Pepper sucks almost as bad as it's website :)

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:00 PM

Baker & McKenzie is pretty bad...

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:02 PM

I like to feel the Skadden star shining on my face.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:09 PM

Kaye Scholer's website looks like it's stuck in 1998. Images that change colors when you mouse over? Neato! Time for a face lift...

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:10 PM

I always thought that Davis was the worst because it is supposed to have the best looking associates, but has no pictures on the bios to confirm this.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:13 PM

Wachtell is so badass they don't need anything but the simplest of websites. Just like a spectacular diamond doesn't need an ornamental setting to make it look fancier than it is.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:15 PM

I tried going to Assbill's website but kept being redirected to the billing page of a gay porn company.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:24 PM

I'm not sure I get what's wrong with Pepper Hamilton's website. Maybe it loads differently on my computer. It looks fine -- just like all the rest of them.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:26 PM

This is one of the best I've seen:

http://arnoldporter.webfactional.com/

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:29 PM

34: I don't want to pick on anyone, but the firm does place it in the public, so the attention is warranted.

That is one of the funniest things I've seen.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:31 PM

I hate Pepper Hamilton more than I hate the demon offspring of fired Paul Hastings associates.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:31 PM

Why do they put the school down?! We get it: you have associates from schools like Harvard and Columbia. Why not put substantial deals they've completed?

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:33 PM

I have always thought Jones Day has a horrible website, it look like it was made in the mid 1990s, kind of remind of Yahoo in the good old days.
They even have some dead links!! How can you top that?

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:37 PM

Recycling your own prior story = FAIL.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:38 PM

Hungry Hungry chipmunk. It is sweeping the nation.
Hungry Hungry chipmunk.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:43 PM

I emailed Lat to recommend this as a post idea last November. Missed opportunity to do a much funnier job than this article...

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:54 PM

18: I guarantee you an overpaid advertising and marketing firm was involved in that wretchedly uninteresting web site. Talk about waiting for something to load.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:56 PM

http://www.bolanjahnsen.com/

Trust me. Hands down the best website ever.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 12:58 PM

I love the Gibson site. If I am ever arrested or under investigation for, let's say, bribing the Nigerian government for a natural gas contract and run the risk of an FCPA prosecution, I am SO hiring them. I am never cornered. I just need a new way of thinking.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 1:01 PM

Missed the boat on this one.

How about the all time worst (or best if humor is the criteria) website?

www.williegary.com

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 1:11 PM

44: Way to read buzz-words literally. I'm sure that you would make a top-notch management consultant or financial adviser.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 1:16 PM

Hungry Hungry Chipmunk. Devouring your nuts one gobble at a time.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 1:17 PM

I'm so GREAT for picking FORTY-EIGHT!!!

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 1:18 PM

FIFTY is SPIFFY

--but--

FORTY-NINE is the NINES!!!

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 1:28 PM

49 has aids.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 1:49 PM

Re graphics: Less is more on lawfirm websites.

But I do like them loaded with tons of information, bios, memos, news, etc.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 2:16 PM

There are WAY worse websites out there.

Just about anyone in the AmLaw 200 has a crap site. Loeb's doesn't even work. Allen Matkins' looks like it was created by a special needs 3 year-old with a blindfold. Baker Hostetler??? My eyes still burn!

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 2:22 PM

43-

Concur. Hilarious.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 2:26 PM

45 thinks that Willie Gary's website is the "all time worst" because Willie Gary is black.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 2:26 PM

52, I resent that. Had I designed the Allen Matkins website it would have looked far better than it does. I designed the Loeb site.

Sincerely,
Blindfolded special needs 3-year old.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 3:13 PM

Fulbright & Jaworski is the worst. Their website almost never works. Last year I never could get it to work and this year again for OCI I couldn't get it to work.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 3:44 PM

What firm has the best website?

I think Simpson Thacher & Bartlett is pretty cool.

www.stblaw.com

(and, no, I don't work for STB)

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 4:22 PM

12:10 - Photos were taken off the Davis website several years ago after female attorneys started attracting stalkers.

Yes, DPW lawyers are just that hot.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 4:29 PM

58 - obviously you have not seen the female litigators in DPW's Menlo Park Office. Over the years I've run into a few, and quickly ran away each time.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 4:33 PM

59: you're being ridiculous. You're supposed to run TO beautiful, ravishing women, not AWAY from them.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 4:43 PM

Hands down best law firm web site ever:

http://www.jwsanchez.com/

Just make sure you're audio is not muted. The intro is the best. And yes, it is for real.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 4:43 PM

Hands down best law firm web site ever:

http://www.jwsanchez.com/

Just make sure your audio is not muted. The intro is the best. And yes, it is for real.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 5:07 PM

60 = female DPW Menlo Park litigator

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 4, 2008 5:12 PM

silly 58, you can't run away from them. they'll just fly after you on their brooms

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 5, 2008 9:07 AM

I like that Jorge has his site so efficiently organized: "modeling", "literature" ("Mr. Pitiful"), "Acting."

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 8:28 PM

If you don't like the worst law firm websites, check out some of the best law firm website design at http://www.bestlawfirmsites.com

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 10, 2008 12:34 PM

62:

that. was. amazing.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 7, 2009 11:44 PM

Apparently Kaye Scholer got the message...a new website is now up and running.

Post Your Comment