Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Layoff Watch: Bell Boyd Confirms Layoffs

Bell Boyd logo.JPGBell Boyd & Lloyd managing partner Nancy Bertoglio has confirmed the layoffs we reported earlier today. She stated that 10 associates were laid off today:

Like many firms, Bell Boyd is facing unprecedented market conditions and we are taking measures to ensure the firm’s efficient operation and growth. Today regrettably, Management, in individual meetings with associates, asked 10 to leave effective January 1, 2009. The associates affected were representative of practices across the firm, and none were first year associates. All are in the Chicago office. This is a belt-tightening measure that will put us in a better position to ride out the economic storm and remain competitive in what we expect will be a challenging business environment for law firms and our clients.

Nancy Bertoglio
Managing Partner

At least the firm didn’t throw mud on the associates on the way out of the door. This message makes it clear that the layoffs were done for economic reasons, not because the 10 associates were “under performing” in some way.

Good luck to the most recent additions to the job hunting community.

Earlier: Nationwide Layoff Watch: Katten’s Official Message
Update: Sonnenschein Confirms Attorney Layoff Numbers
Nationwide Layoff Watch: Jenner & Block Cuts … Partners

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:03 PM

firsty first first b!atches

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:03 PM

first
j

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:03 PM

3RD BITCHES!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:03 PM

3RD BITCHES!

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:07 PM

everyone who wants to hire a T-10 1L (michigan summer starter 3.7+ gpa) please send me your offers - nervoust101l@yahoo.com (due to nalp guidelines i cannot begin job searching until december 1, this is just a request for information about your firms/gov't positions/in-house/etc.)

-nervous T10 1L

*takes hustling for a 1L job to new levels*

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:10 PM

I heard this is in anticipation of a Bell Boyd & Lloyd and WILDMAN HARROLD merger. New firm name:

Worst Name Ever, LLP

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:11 PM

Is it possible to email anthrax to a yahoo.com account?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:11 PM

At least the firm gave them a few months notice. I've been laid off twice, and it really goes to your sense of self-worth. Good luck.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:12 PM

New firm name: WILDBELL HARROYD. Solid.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:14 PM

I extend my deepest and most sincere sympathies to Bell Boyd associates.

At least you'll be in good company with a lot of good folks, like those laid off in American Express.

You'll have more time to read. Might I suggest Michael Harvey's "The Chicago Way"?

~In House Counsel

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:15 PM

I think this is the best way to conduct layoffs. If you really have to do it, then just come out into the open and be honest about it and give the guys as much notice as possible. The firms that pawn these things off as "performance based" aren't fooling anyone.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:21 PM

. . . anyone except prospective employers.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:24 PM

New firm to be called:

Bell, Lloyd and Hemmorrhoids

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:28 PM

I note that Bertoglio wrote "none were..." Since she practices in Posner's circuit, I would advise her to change this practice.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:33 PM

*checks email, sees that it's empty...cries*

-nervous T-10 1L

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:35 PM

Bell, Boyd, Lloyd, & Unemployed

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:37 PM

10 has stopped snarking about job security because he was laid off from Amex?

avatar
18 Posted by FRAT STUD | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:41 PM

Guys at my high school listened to Bell Bid Devoe all the time. It was no big deal.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:43 PM

17,

How did you ever manage to pass the bar let alone all those exams in law school?

I suggest that you go back to community college to retake Reading 101.

Did any of your professors recommend that you not continue law school? If so, you should have taken that advice and gone into a field that didn't involve reading or writing.

Perhaps an elephant proctologist?

~In House Counsel

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:44 PM

Were any of the 10 HYS graduates or were they all GULC grads

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:44 PM

"Listen Lloyd, I want you to put all my folders, binders, EVERYTHING, into a box. If you find a used condom, an executioner's mask and a f**king spike paddle, don't think, just pack that bitch. Chop suey.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:46 PM

What about the 10-12 nonequity partners and counsel reportedly also let go at BBL. Any comment on that development? The work was said to have fallen off the table, just nothing to do.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:48 PM

What about the 10-12 nonequity partners and counsel reportedly also let go at BBL. Any comment on that development? The work was said to have fallen off the table, just nothing to do.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:48 PM

What about the 10-12 nonequity partners and counsel reportedly also let go at BBL. Any comment on that development? The work was said to have fallen off the table, just nothing to do.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:52 PM

What about the 10-12 nonequity partners and counsel reportedly also let go. Any comment on that development? The work was said to have fallen off the table, just nothing to do.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:53 PM

What about the 10-12 nonequity partners and counsel reportedly also let go at BBL. Any comment on that development? The work was said to have fallen off the table, just nothing to do.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:53 PM

What about the 10-12 nonequity partners and counsel reportedly also let go at BBL. Any comment on that development? The work was said to have fallen off the table, just nothing to do.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:55 PM

I love it when they say it was all for economic reasons. So, did they pick the people who would be laid off at random, or was there some thought behind who they decided to let go?

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:01 PM

What about the 10-12 nonequity partners and counsel reportedly also let go. Any comment on that development? The work was said to have fallen off the table, just nothing to do.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:01 PM

28,

If you looked at a partner funny or didn't appear to show any partnership potential, i.e. picking your nose, farting, etc. in front of clients, then you got dismissed.

avatar
31 Posted by frmcd24 | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:08 PM

22-27, 29—do you stutter when you talk or just when you write? Why don't you keep posting that comment. It is brilliant and should be posted at least 40 times. 28--where did the memo say it was ALL for economic reasons? Moron. Use some common sense.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:12 PM

Bell, Boyd & Lloyd -- now you know.

That firm is poison....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdNpj7Emn4k

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:30 PM

16 = win

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:41 PM

Who's next for associate layoffs? Sidley? Jenner? Mayer?

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:58 PM

Bell, Biv & Devoe LLP

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 5:00 PM

Ha, as if BBL could be compared to Sidley, Jenner, Mayer. BBL is a joke.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 5:28 PM

Orrick stealth layoffs

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 5:31 PM

What about the 10-12 nonequity partners and counsel reportedly also let go. Any comment on that development? The work was said to have fallen off the table, just nothing to do.

avatar
39 Posted by frmcd24 | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 5:32 PM

Back to your doc review 36 or you will be next on the chopping block.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:30 PM

Why are all the recent layoffs happening in Chicago? Who is next?

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:38 PM

Shortage of good work at midsizers. Profits in the toilet. Best lawyers are leaving for new national firm branches or going in house.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 7:06 PM

Everyone calm down.....The job market for lawyers remains strong !!! From a Colorado Legal recruiter.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 7:55 PM

Are all midsize firms in trouble? I'm still holding an open offer at Patterson Belknap because the firm has such a strong lit. practice....I figure they will be well placed in the current economy. Is this a mistake? Should I be looking elsewhere?

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 30, 2008 10:17 PM

43 -- I wouldn't compare on this evidence. BBL is not much of a firm these days and certainly is not in the league of Patterson Belknap by any reasonable measure. BBL won't survive 6 months without a merger. Patterson Belknap has a solid future.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 12:01 AM

43,

I'm at a V20 and work with a few Patterson associates in a financial institution litigation. Patterson represents a co-defendant. I would say that I am favorably impressed by the people that I know there.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 12:03 AM

oy. I apparently didn't proofread well enough. Pls strike the unneccessary "a" towards the end of the first sentence.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 12:51 AM

20:

They were not from GULC. They were all from UPenn State Philadelphia campus.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 4:49 AM

Does anyone know what's happening at McCarter & English?

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 11:55 AM

Anyone know what practice areas were affected? The IP group is the largest, but I think it was also the most profitable.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 12:35 PM

Is this finally the end to midsized, regional law firm with an identity crisis?
Reviewing the site, maybe it was not such a good idea to hire

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 12:38 PM

Is this finally the end to midsized, regional law firm with an identity crisis?
Maybe it was not such a good idea to hire 13 new first years only then to have to fire 10 associates who were already practicing at the firm to pay for the new ones? I bet they are excited to meet the new class.

From what I hear does anyone there have any work (other than IP)?

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 3:18 PM

This is an IP firm. I thought IP is recessionproof (or is it just patent?). Any patent people among the casualties?

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 4:42 PM

Actually, it was 14 new first years, which really doesn't help as there is no work.
They also had a very large incoming class the year before, which was right at the start of the market decline. In total about 29 new first and second years, or about 1/10 of the whole firm.
I hear from fellow associates there may be more if they do not find a merger partner soon.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 5:42 PM

None of these 10 associates will be affected by the Obama tax plan.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 1, 2008 8:49 PM

Will the attorneys who are being terminated receive severance? What is "market" for layoff severance at Big Law these days? With layoffs underway throughout the profession, ATL should consider launching a new feature: "Severance Watch."

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 4, 2008 4:51 PM

I believe they got two months severance. They were all associates at various levels. They also let a few paralegals go too. Newest round of layoffs was a couple of weeks ago and included marketing staff and secretaries - but of course no press release is required for the little people.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 4, 2008 4:53 PM

I believe they got two months severance. They were all associates at various levels. They also let a few paralegals go too. Newest round of layoffs was a couple of weeks ago and included marketing staff and secretaries - but of course no press release is required for the little people.

Post Your Comment