Breaking News: Ted Stevens Guilty
Breaking from CNBC, CNN, and NYT, Alaska Senator Ted Stevens has been found guilty on all seven counts of making false statements on Senate disclosure forms.
More to come.
Update (4:24): The jury started to deliberate Wednesday. On Monday jurors noted a discrepancy between the indictment and the evidence. According to CNN:
The indictment accuses Stevens of checking “No” in response to a question about whether Stevens or his family had “any reportable gift … more than $260” in 2001. But the form introduced as evidence in court shows he checked “Yes.”
The prosecution argued that the discrepancy was a mere typo, while the defense argued that the typo required the judge to throw out a specific count of the indictment. The judge was angry about the error:
But he did say the defense proposal went too far, instead deciding to tell the jury to match the available evidence with the appropriate charges in the indictment.“The indictment is merely a charging document, it is not evidence. You must consider all the evidence and my instructions to determine if the government has proven each element in the indictment beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Stevens (R) is locked in a re-election battle in Alaska. Conventional wisdom was that Stevens would either lose his race or get drummed out of the Senate if he was found guilty. Politico reports:
And even if he wins reelection, Stevens could face an expulsion from the Senate. Of the four sitting senators who were convicted of crimes while in office, only one — Sen. Truman Newberry (R-Mich.) — continued to serve after being found guilty, and he was eventually hounded out of office in 1922 by senators seeking his expulsion.
The lead prosecutor for the Department of Justice was Brenda Morris, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University Law Center who received her JD from Howard University. Brendan Sullivan (JD GULC) of Williams and Connolly represented Stevens.
Jury finds Stevens guilty on corruption charges [CNN]
Jury: Stevens guilty on seven counts [Politico]




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
FIRST, muthaf-ers.
Second is the best.
Guilty on all 7 counts.
DAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!
Typcial Republican. I bet he carved a backwards B into his face as well.
sweet
sweet
Gay.
You disgusting fat. How dare you speak to us? Get back to your Fat Man cave.
October .... SURPRISE!
9 - you're scaring me. is it halloween already?
republicans, the whole lot of them, are crooks!
whammy, tough loss for brendan sullivan of w&c, however i suspect stevens has at least a 50% chance of winning an appeal.
Any bets on how long it will take before conservatives are railing that the jury was secretly packed with liberals and this is all a giant left-wing conspiracy to tarnish Alaska's pristine image as the bastion of ethics and morality? Three, two, one . . .
DAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!
12: Ditto for democrats
*sends off resume to US Senate*
-nervous T-10 1L
How do you carve a backwards B on your face? In a mirror.
How did this generator from Veco get in my cubicle?
Guess he should have pushed harder for the mistrial.
nervous T-10 1L, I want to send you off to Alaska, where I hope you are either attacked and killed by some form of wild animal or just freeze to death. I really don't care either way.
20: do they have 1L firm jobs in alaska?
*watches 'into the wild' vomits over idiocy of main character...feels better about self*
-nervous T-10 1L
17 - finally a good use
a nice rebuke to Brendan Sullivan's scorched earth business model.
shocker (yawn)
How hypocritical that Drudge was later than CNN and practically ATL on this, and is now burying it in regular black font. Even Jennifer Hudson's nephew gets the red bold font.
alright nervous, I have to give you credit for pointing out that the main character of " into the wild" was actually just stupid. People keep saying that he was noble, or heroic, or tragic or some stupid stuff like that. He was really just a moron.
activist jurors
What kind of chances are we giving the appeal?
Fat man in a liiiitle blog....
Take it off dickhead, I'm serious.
There may be "hope" on the appeal. There was a discrepency between the evidence and the charging indictment. When the jury brought this to the court's attention, the court's charge to was:
"The indictment is merely a charging document, it is not evidence. You must consider all the evidence and my instructions to determine if the government has proven each element in the indictment beyond a reasonable doubt."
While I believe this is not reversible error, an appellate attorney may try and make some serious hay with this.
17 -- you should route that to Palin, S., and study for ConLaw.
Are we really surprised? Republicans either are crooked or closeted gays that like little boys. I'm actually worried about the next few years because DC won't be half as entertaining after the more legitimate parties sweeps the elections next week.
What's the news here. Nice reporting job elsie
9: made me laugh so hard almost fell out of my chair.
So.....no talk about Barack the Redistributor's views on the Warren Court's "failure" to address "economic injustice"?
Elie - again, you are a liberal hack. Your total failure to post this story is pathetic.
Thanks 36: WSJ also interviewed some AUSA to add some color to its report.
36 - The media/liberal blogosphere has baracknophobia, they can report nothing bad about Obama. Notice the surprisingly sparse coverage of Biden's promise that enemies of the U.S. will manufacture an international crisis if Obama is elected to "test him".
One corrupt senator down, 99 to go.
So a Howard University lawyer beat a GULC lawyer. So much for the elitist ranking system. Good lawyers are everywhere and come from every school. THAT is why law firms and judges should consider the merits of a candidate's application, not the school s/he attended.
40 must be from TTTulane
60 senate seats, here we come!
33 - Yes, because all of the corrupt and stupid politicians are solely within one party. No democrat (or independent or whatever) has been in any recent scandal.
The bar is set really, really, really, low by the outgoing GOP, but I'm sure the Dems will find a way to their level as well. They both suck.
40 - you should know by now that GULC is at best on par with Howard, if not immensely worse.
60 senate seats, here we come!
40 - Did you hear about all of the horrible errors that the Howard lawyer made? The (inexcusable) error on the indictment wasn't the first one... this was an incredibly poorly run prosecution, especially considering how high profile the defendant was and how impactful the decision is likely to be. All signs point to the defense doing a better job, but still losing in the face of a tough case.
But definitely not the finest moment for GULC (I went there btw). The prosecutor is a dumbass and a GULC professor and Stevens' guy was a GULC grad who couldn't get the job done.
Stevens really got GULC'd on this one. Might as well have pled guilty and saved himself the time.
40,
I'm not from a top tier school (although I work T5), but even I call b.s. Have you considered the relative strengths of their positions...or even the mass of evidence against Stevens?
40,
I'm not from a top tier school (although I work T5), but even I call b.s. Have you considered the relative strengths of their positions...or even the mass of evidence against Stevens?
40,
I'm not from a top tier school (although I work T5), but even I call b.s. Have you considered the relative strengths of their positions...or even the mass of evidence against Stevens?
40,
I'm not from a top tier school (although I work T5), but even I call b.s. Have you considered the relative strengths of their positions...or even the mass of evidence against Stevens?
38 -- I love McCain's use of that: Vote for me or you'll DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
YOU'RE GONNA LOSE! YOU'RE GONNA LOSE!
MWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
48-51, could you try not being an asshat? Thanks.
Ooooooh! It's gonna be tough for Stevens in jail, where he'll have no access whatsoever to PEANUTS and CHEESE!
Hoya Lawya represnt
GW > GULC
Ten to one W. pardons him by Election Day.
Repukes down - Ney, Cunningham, Weldon, Jerry Lewis, Vitter, Foley, Craig, Renzi, Young, Fossela and Stevens.
Democrats - Jefferson (no trial) and Spitzer.
I wonder which is the party of corporate corruption (and bailouts).
Republicans, bad at capitalism and leading the country.
I like to save my poopie in little jars.
-nervous T-10 1L
and Bershad got 6 months. Scoop some ice cream Elsie.
Guys in my high school got GULC'ed by hot chicks all the time. It was no big deal.
48-51:
The charges against Stevens are irrelevant. The point is that Howard won, GULC lost. Period. No one cares if the losing team had the second-string QB in the game. The losing team lost.
26- read the book. he wasn't stupid.
Guys from my high school were convicted of making false and misleading statements on financial disclosure forms all the time. it was no big deal.
FRAT STUD
57 - Republican is the party of bailouts? Do you live under a rock?
I'm almost going to enjoy when Barack wins and you liberals have no one to blame when things just get worse and worse. It is going to be nice for once to be able to sit back and say "well I voted for the other guy".
My sentiments on the fine gentleman exactly, 26. Well-played. The worst part of the story/movie - throwing the retarded kid's parents under the bus.
Related death-in-Alaska story: The Anchorage Daily News endorses Barack. Did that make the Drudge Report?
Job opening for Palin?
W ain't pardoning this guy. He'll keep filing stuff and delay jail time until he's so old they don't even want to put him in there. He'll never really see any punishment for this.
65: because it probably sucked to sit around for the last 8 years and realize how much of a fucking retard you were for voting for bush twice.
W+C is no longer supreme in DC litigation...e.g. Jeffrey Smith's team at Arnold + Porter = probably better for this kind of ethics/politics investigation/lit
Well played, 65.
65 - so you're happy with the way things have been going in the Bush era?!
69 - Everything considered Bush was still a better President than Gore or Kerry would have been. I feel confident in my 2004 vote for Bush, I didn't vote in 2000, I wasn't 18.
-65
Scratch 71. I meant "well-played, 69." Numbers are hard.
72 - see my post at 73
-65
The republican voters of Alaska knew about these charges and the forthcoming trial during the primaries...it was not the smartest move on their part to select him as their nominee (Not trying a Rep. v. Dem thing here, just saying that had they selected the other guy, next Tuesday would still matter in deciding who from Alaska would be a senator for the next 6 years).
61 - Whatever makes you feel better when you're crying yourself to sleep after a long weekend of document review at your TTT lawfirm. I'm really sure your bosses will keep this case in mind during their next round of stealth layoffs.
65/75 - Well, on whose feet would you place the blame for all the crap this country has been in for the last 8 years?
You betcha he would not have been convicted if Palin testified as a character witness saying how helpful it is to have Ted in Washington protecting Alaska skies when that Putin dude flies over the Bering Strait.
73 is also confident about getting a job at Heller.
We can't stop here, this is bat country!
38 - the Biden comment about a speculative international crisis to test the new president received little media fanfare because it deserved none. And the fact that McCain seized on it as somehow relevant to his shitty campaign is sad and pathetic.
78 - terrorists
Nytimes has a photo of him leaving court. Why wasn't he taken into custody?
82 - I took a crap today that looked remarkably like your face.
84: He was headed to Elsie's for some coffee and donuts.
82: Agreed, but the real story is that Biden said Obama's response to the international crisis will probably be unpopular, but we should have faith in him and back him up, even if we think he is wrong.
That's not change, that's more of the same.
82 - Why does Biden's comment deserve no attention? I somehow see the potential VP of the U.S. guaranteeing an international crisis if his running mate is elected as relevant to the election.
82 - It at least deserved fanfare in regards to it being yet another illustration of Biden's inability to control what comes out of his mouth. Palin got crucified for sounding like a fucking moron, but Biden goes and does the same thing and he gets off easy. Its not that big a deal anyway, since no one cares about Biden, but it is just one more reminder that he is just as dumb as Palin and McCain (none of them graduated higher than bottom 15%... talk about TTT). At least Obama is smart enough to make some decisions, and once he's president we might actually see him make some, instead of just copying whatever Hillary says.
Is noone going to mention how retarded the lawyers for the government are that they got the indictment wrong? AA at its worst.
83 - I hope you are joking.
88, 89 - 82 here - even if Biden described it as a "guarantee," it was still pure speculation, and at least he had the balls, not stupidity, to make an honest assessment. The only voters whose minds were likely to change based on that speculative statement would probably have voted for McCain anyway.
91 - No
-83
92 - I see your point and recognize that the "guarantee" is pure speculation but it raises a real issue. I'm not sure why this isn't something that should get media attention. Biden is essentially weighing in on an issue in a way that favors McCain.
-88
I used to think Williams & Connolly was invincible, just goes to show you that anyone can get GULC'd these days.
83 = jackass
Terrorists - anyone who doesn't think dinosaurs walked around with homo-sapiens.
interesting how the jury comes to a decision right after one juror leaves for CA and is dismissed. she was apparently the holdout and probably couldn't take all the lefties on the jury badgering her all day.
96 = terrorist
-83
96 - your sarcasm leads me to believe that you likely live in an un-American part of the country.
99 why do you assume that 96 lives in the country?
100, true, he's probably holed up in one of them caves, but one with wi-fi.
100 - 96 has to live in "the country" becuase that could be any country. As long as 96 lives in a country 99's statement is fine. Any country have have an un-American part.
99 -
"Un-American"? Do you live in a part of the country where everyone wears a hat to work? How many NASCAR shirts do you own? Can you count the number of stop signs in your county on one hand?
Here you go 99:
"Freedom isn't free
It's got hefty fuckin' fee"
96
96 = un-American
-83
73, how could the country POSSIBLY be worse under gore and kerry. this country literally couldn't have had a worse 8 years. there is literally nothing that could have been botched worse than the way bush botched it.
103 - yes, 5, and depends on if your countin' on my tractor accident hand or not.
103/96 - Interesting post, but I guess my sarcasm didn't come through. Trust me, I'm on your side. --99
If McCain can't be our next President I want Bush to be our LAST President.
96/103 - I guess you didn't pick up on my sarcasm in response to your sarcasm. Our sarcasms canceled each other out. Interesting post, though.
--99
105 - False. We could have done nothing. Which is exactly what either of those two pansies (Gore/Kerry) would have done. And it is exactly what Barack will do. I enjoy a President who's philosphy is to shoot first, shoot later, and let God sort them out.
-73
Even cadwalader sean knows there's no such thing as a halfway crook
Great post 110/73. I'm sure that is your philosophy until you have to do the shooting.
But you don't shoot guns, do you?
108 - going to blow up the entire country next week.
TTTexas probably loves this guy.
112 - Yes, I do.
-73/110
113: it was a Daily Show reference, not a threat.
108
Moody's just downgraded SkaddenDC to TTTexas.
119 is an asshat
W&C = Massively overrated
ha ha 119, you walked right into it.
118
110 - until you are the one getting shot at...
121 - I have been shot at. And trust me it is all the more reason to shoot first. You don't want to have to hope they miss so you can return.
-110
108: But if McCain is our next president, Palin may be our last president.
123: but she's so pretty. Look pretty, me vote now.
I am glad the the court is starting to make an example of people like Ted Stevens. Public figures often flout the legal system as if they're above the laws that regular people must abide by. Stevens probably thought he'd never have to answer to anyone for his corruption, just like Anna Nicole Smith probably thought she'd eventually get a piece of the Marshall fortune simply by relentlessly contesting it. I hope that Stevens has learned that he is a man and not a demi-god and that those who survived Anna Nicole see the foolishness of her claim and choose to let it die with her. Perhaps justice is making a comeback in the 21st century.
110 -- How does it feel to watch your ideological view crumble in front of your eye?
Twenty years from now, every heated debate will dissemble into one side saying to the other "that's what the Republicans did."
126 - My idealogical views are not crumbling. I believe just as strongly as ever. We are going through a tough time as a country and the Republicans happen to be in power, so naturally the American people are starting to swing the other way. We have a two party system. The Republicans aren't going away, and the Democrats can't control everything forever. We just have to make it through the next 4-8 years of Democrats controlling Washington. Then we can come right back. The fact is that there is a huge portion of the country that still supports the Republican party. They just don't get as much media coverage.
-110
110/127: Yes, but it is dead politically. And there's nothing you can do about it. I mean, when Charles Fried votes Democratic, you're in trouble.
Oh, there will be a Republican party, but it will be the party of opposition for a LONG time to come. See 1932-1952.
--126
117 - brilliant.
119 -- sorry you didn't get an offer (or even an initial interview). as if c&b or a&p could have gotten him acquitted!
it's easy to prosecute when you don't have to play by the rules. stevens will win his appeal...
from the BLT:
"The prosecutors had to report themselves to the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility during the trial for ethical violations. Exculpatory evidence was hidden from my lawyers. A witness was kept from us and then sent back to Alaska. The Government lawyers allowed evidence to be introduced that they knew was false."
Earlier today, when the jury found a conflict between the evidence and the seven-count indictment, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan dismissed a prosecutor's excuse that the mistake was typographical. During the course of the four-week trial, Judge Sullivan blasted Justice Department prosecutors for a series of mistakes he deemed intentional. The judge brought sanctions against the government that included striking certain records from evidence.
Elie is the best. Long live Elie.
Elie is the best. Long live Elie.
A conviction on a seven count indictment isn't like a garbage truck. It's like a series of seven tubes.
I'm gonna go ahead and say that no matter how good W&C is, you've got a crap bag of a defendant if "I didn't know" and "It was a loan" are the best defenses he has. He's clearly guilty as sin, and he'll lose his job for it.
135 -- well, those are the types of cases w&c takes, not the easy ones. win some, lose some, but apparently stevens thought that if he was gonna go to trial and take a chance and throw a hail mary, w&c is the firm to go with.
136--Sorry, I must not have been clear. I'm defending W&C. For people on here to say they did a worse job than the prosecution is absurd. When you start off with a defendant who's already half way up the river and who lost his paddles miles back, there's not much you can do for him. If anyone could have pulled something out of this case, it was W&C. Now, we see how their appeals go.
135
This is how DoJ won -- cheating + incompetence.
http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/files/TS.source.prod_affiliate.7.PDF