Add RSS RSS

Grade Reform Comes to the University of Chicago?
Not So Fast My Friends

UofC Law School logo.JPGThe University of Chicago Law School is ranked as the seventh best law school in the nation according to U.S. News and World Report.

As we have extensively reported, the top-six schools (Yale, Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, NYU, Berkeley) have all moved away from letter grading towards a modified pass/fail system, or are contemplating such a move (Yale and Berkeley have had pass/fail systems for some time).

The University of Chicago Law School, which currently has a grading system that defies rational understanding, is the next logical school to face the growing tide towards grade reform. On Friday, an all faculty meeting took place to discuss the matter.

According to tipsters, one professor discussed the meeting with his class. The professor suggested that the administration felt they had to consider the issue with an eye towards remaining competitive with their peer institutions. The professor then asked the class if they shared those concerns:

Interestingly enough, the professor who mentioned this to us did a straw poll of students (mostly 2Ls) and the vast majority were in favor of staying on our current system. It’s not like anyone knows what our system really is/means, so why change it?

The Dean responds after the jump.

We haven’t received any information directly from faculty members who were actually at the meeting. Whether or not they had the meeting as a direct response to the moves taken by other top schools, University of Chicago Law School Dean Saul Levmore said that the meeting had a much different tenor than the one suggested by our tipsters:

Gee, the opposite is true. A meeting but no interest in the pass/fail-ish system

It sounds like Chicago is prepared to hold the line. It is well established that you need a Captain Crunch decoder ring to understand a UofC Law transcript. But at least their system is their system, not some carbon-copy of other people’s ideas.

Next up: University of Pennsylvania. Are they going to move towards some kind of hippie “pass/tried really hard” system, or does Chicago’s move stop the pedagogical backsliding?

Earlier: NYU Law Grade Reform: Another Law School Loses Its Fastball
Grade Reform Reaction Roundup

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:23 PM

NEver first :(

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:23 PM

Chicago was never ranked this low before Leiter came to town.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:26 PM

Obscene US News trolling Elie. Nobody legitimately believes Berkeley is better than Chicago.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:30 PM

I legitimately believe Berkeley is better than Chicago.

- Boalt '07

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:41 PM

I do not believe that Berkeley is better than Chicago.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:41 PM

I'll betcha Scalia does.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:42 PM

4 = blatant Loyola Chicago trolling.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:42 PM

Chicago is better than NYU and Berkeley which are both TTT. Chicago sets the tone traditionally rather than following the pack. And btw I dont hear Chicago kids posting about recruiting trouble like the TTT Harvard lads

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:42 PM

Chicago is better than NYU and Berkeley which are both TTT. Chicago sets the tone traditionally rather than following the pack. And btw I dont hear Chicago kids posting about recruiting trouble like the TTT Harvard lads

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:42 PM

Chicago is better than NYU and Berkeley which are both TTT. Chicago sets the tone traditionally rather than following the pack. And btw I dont hear Chicago kids posting about recruiting trouble like the TTT Harvard lads

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:43 PM

Chicago is better than NYU and Berkeley which are both TTT. Chicago sets the tone traditionally rather than following the pack. And btw I dont hear Chicago kids posting about recruiting trouble like the TTT Harvard lads

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:43 PM

Chicago is better than NYU and Berkeley which are both TTT. Chicago sets the tone traditionally rather than following the pack. And btw I dont hear Chicago kids posting about recruiting trouble like the TTT Harvard lads

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:43 PM

Did you even READ your own post about NYU, MysTTTal? I don't recall them abandoning grades, just changing the curves.

WTF?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:43 PM

I think this is great, it's a line in the sand. One side of the line is populated/guided by Yale and Boalt and the other side is Chicago. I'm glad that a Chicago is not simply conforming like the top 5 USNEWS schools (minus Yale, since they kind of started this whole thing).

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:44 PM

Chicago is better than NYU and Berkeley which are both TTT. Chicago sets the tone traditionally rather than following the pack. And btw I dont hear Chicago kids posting about recruiting trouble like the TTT Harvard lads

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:44 PM

Chicago is better than NYU and Berkeley which are both TTT. Chicago sets the tone traditionally rather than following the pack. And btw I dont hear Chicago kids posting about recruiting trouble like the TTT Harvard lads

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:44 PM

Our strategy is this: we hit them in the mouth.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:44 PM

Chicago is better than NYU and Berkeley which are both TTT. Chicago sets the tone traditionally rather than following the pack. And btw I dont hear Chicago kids posting about recruiting trouble like the TTT Harvard lads

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:44 PM

Chicago is better than NYU and Berkeley which are both TTT. Chicago sets the tone traditionally rather than following the pack. And btw I dont hear Chicago kids posting about recruiting trouble like the TTT Harvard lads

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:45 PM

i'm nervous about berkeley being better than hofstranus

-nervous T-10 1L

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:45 PM

8/9/10 & 12/13

Those comments just proved that Chicago is TTT. Learn to fucking post.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:46 PM

DUrrmrm asf..as.df Chicagos is bettearsfas

DAR!

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:50 PM

Multiple posters should be summarily executed.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:51 PM

Don't forget Northeastern does the pass/fail too!

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:53 PM

WOW I guess this blog is now officially a LAW STUDENT blog and no longer a lawyer blog. This is dumb and Elie is dumb for assuming that everybody knows all about the current Chicago grading system. What an idiot.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:55 PM

ATL,

Do you have any idea how easy it is to write a script that prevents multiple posting? The fact that a website with this kind of traffic and likely has some serious ad revenue coming in continues to maintain such a shoddy system is mindbogggling. Are you trying to go a "drudge-like old school this site is run by a junior high computer class" feel?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 12:56 PM

51, nobody knows about the current Chicago grading system.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:00 PM

i'm nervous

-nervous T-10 1L

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:13 PM

The Chicago School believes in competition. At least the law school believes in competition still.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:17 PM

Elie, you're just sounding naive when you talk as if a school is the X best school based on the US News rankings.

I'm proud of Chicago holding the line, if they do. A law student's chances of getting a supreme court clerkship are already the highest at Yale and Chicago. No one knows how to read the Chicago grading system except feeder judges, and that's how they'd like to keep it.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:19 PM

Can someone try to explain the Chicago grading system? I'm curious.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:20 PM

"pedagogical backsliding" shush Elie, no one cares.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:21 PM

The Chicago Law School employs a unique grading system with a range from 155 to 186. These numerical grades convert to the more familiar alphabetical scale as follows: 155-159 = F, 160-167 = D, 168-173 = C, 174-179 = B, 180-186 = A. For classes of more than 50 students, the median grade is 177, and the number of As should approximately equal the number of Cs.
A student graduates "with honors" if a final average of 179 is attained, "with high honors" if a final average of 180.5 is attained, and "with highest honors" if a final average of 182 is attained. The latter achievement is rare; typically only one student every few years will attain the requisite 182 average. Additionally, the Law School awards two class-rank based honors at graduation. The top 10% are honored as "Order of the Coif," and the top 5% are honored as "Kirkland Scholars" (a designation created in 2006 by a $7 million donation from the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis). [5]
The grading scale was previously 55-86, but the school prefixed their grades with a "1" in 2003 to avoid confusion with traditional grading scales.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:25 PM

I've heard that Northwestern is the best school in Chicago and that U of C students are just a bunch of arrogant assholes who lack personality and climb all over each other's back to get to the top.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:25 PM

33 - Who are you? Wikipedia?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:26 PM

180+ = A
174-179 = B
168-173 = C
167 and lower....you don't want to know.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:27 PM

I would not accept the title of "Kirkland Scholar." Who wants to be branded by some corporation right out of School?

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:29 PM

U. Chicago nerds in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0UN_ZIaYjQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3K9uGmvw8cg

Add in LeiTTTer and it only gets worse.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:34 PM

Re: posts 4-11 et al. and to anybody else making the case that Chicago Law is better than Berkely or NYU, I simply say--SCOREBOARD! And it's not like this just happened; NYU has been ranked higher than Chicago for at least the past 5 years. Those who still think Chicago is among the top 5 law schools in this country are the same deluded souls who think that the school's economic theories are still groundbreaking and/or credible.

Get over your TTT school in your TTT city. I'm not even sure it's the best school in Chicago anymore.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:40 PM

180 for Lee Corso reference.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:40 PM

Yale and Berkeley have turned every top school into Socialists!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:42 PM

"I would not accept the title of "Kirkland Scholar." Who wants to be branded by some corporation right out of School?"

But the Chicago School believes that corporations and free markets embody everything good about mankind. to them, getting branded by some corporation must be like being ordained as a holy man.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:43 PM

You're exactly right 39, cuz the "Chicago School of ECONOMICS" came from the law school. In fact, I remember taking Torts with Milton Friedman and Contracts with Gary Becker.

Also, your scoreboard argument is meaningless because actual legal employers (not college students applying to law school) don't really give a flick about USNews.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:44 PM

Okay, I admit it. I have no idea what you mean by TTT.

I would hire a Chicago grad before a Boalt grad all other things beging equal.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:44 PM

Okay, I admit it. I have no idea what you mean by TTT.

I would hire a Chicago grad before a Boalt grad all other things being equal.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:45 PM

43--true, but the law school certainly adopted the economic theory when it came about. Posner and Easterbrook taught at the LAW school, if I'm not mistaken. So it's actually even worse--the law school staked its reputation on a theory that it didn't even come up with; it was just riding the business school's coattails! What a TTT.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:46 PM

43--true, but the law school certainly adopted the economic theory when it came about. Posner and Easterbrook taught at the LAW school, if I'm not mistaken. So it's actually even worse--the law school staked its reputation on a theory that it didn't even come up with; it was just riding the business school's coattails! What a TTT.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:50 PM

41 -- agree that Yale and Berkeley turned top law schools into SOCIALISTS!

McCain-Palin '08

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 1:51 PM

Chicago = GULC of the midwest

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:00 PM

chicago WAS better than nyu or berkeley. but no longer. for now, i still see them as a very top school, but it's hard to argue that it is not on a decline.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:01 PM

Ask a hiring partner at any major firm where they'd rather hire from. UC is at the very top. In addition to a conservative approach to the law, UC takes a conservative approach to teaching the law, i.e., the students work and learn all three years. Legal research and writing is taught by practicing lawyers, not by law students (Harvard and others). And there's no third year vacation (everywhere else?).

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:03 PM

For all of you comparing schools and calling one better than the other, what criteria are you using to define "better?"

This is a genuine question and not a backhand comment.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:09 PM

Leiter is a bonehead. He hates PEANUTS and CHEESE!

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:10 PM

uhhh... CLS isn't seriously considering any grade reform. the survey you tanked the other day was run by the student senate -- a useless, self-aggrandizing body of egos bigger than their britches.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:10 PM

GULCers do not appreciate being compared to Chicago. That is worse than being compare to GW.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:15 PM

At U. Penn State Law we had the same grading confusion as Penn State U. Law. Because you can't have two great schools with such confusion, USPL added "+" and "-" after each grade, and eliminated the "whole" grade. So now we are just pluses and minuses. It is great. Chicago Layola should figure that out.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:16 PM

37,

Kirkland and Ellis is an LLP, not a corporation. And yes, it DOES make a difference.

With your attention to detail, don't even worry about being branded a Kirkland scholar. Or working at Kirkland, for that matter.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:17 PM

The Chicago grading system defies rational understanding? It's actually the easiest school transcript for figuring out someone's average. As an on campus recruiter, it's a lot easier to figure out a mathematical average than at some place where you have to determine how many HHs someone needs to get past the grade cutoff. My firm will actually take people with a slightly lower GPA from Chicago than from schools like Boalt or Yale where once you get below a certain threshold it is impossible to tell where exactly someone stands in relation to the median, because we can still tell that the Chicago student is in the top half or third or whatever of his or her class. This movement to squishier grading systems only hurts students' job prospects.

And, believe me, firms don't go by U.S. News. It's kind of a joke.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:20 PM

i'm nervous about getting a job with kirkland.

-nervous T-10 1L

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:23 PM

Do you think Fat Boy Ellie gets really stinky by dinner time after the sweat in his fat rolls ferments all day?

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:26 PM

i'm nervous that nervous T-10 1L will get a better sa position than me

- nervous T-20 1L

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:27 PM

54 = still sad about losing a minimally contested election

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:28 PM

Chicago got GULCed by USNews!

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:29 PM

The real untold story is that Northeastern School of Law has been sans a A-F grading system since 1968, and that all of the so-called elite law schools are really following in its footsteps. Maybe this will mean that Northeastern students might finally start to get decent jobs now?

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:33 PM

I thought they just figured out who the biggest assholes in the class were and labeled them Kirkland scholars. Seems like that would be more appropriate.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:43 PM

Chicago still has the great Richard Epstein and Cass Sunstein as professors, so eat it, T5 (and Berkeley, too).

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:50 PM

Chicago's actual ranking hasn't changed in 35 years:
http://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2008/09/the-more-things.html

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:52 PM

Nervous Top 10:

You are not funny. Your posts are bland. Your posts lack any wit. Your posts lead one to believe you are a person devoid of any real humor. Buddy, get a clue: you are NOT funny and witty. Your parents and their friends only laugh at your jokes at little dinner parties to be nice. I am sure you boring in real life as well.

Now, get nervous about having no legitimate sense of humor.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 2:59 PM

I had a great experience at Boalt. Though I personally respect UC, I know a lot of Californians who went to UC because they could not get into Boalt. "Better" is subjective when you are talking about T10 schools other than YSH.

Go to Boalt if you want nice weather, laid back students, and nona**hole professors.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 3:01 PM

Elie, you are off-base on NYU, as has been *extensively* pointed out over and over again. You are so horrible it pains me.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 3:04 PM

Chicago is better than NYU and Berkeley which are both TTT. Chicago sets the tone traditionally rather than following the pack. And btw I dont hear Chicago kids posting about recruiting trouble like the TTT Harvard lads

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 3:06 PM

i'm *extremely* nervous

-extremely nervous HYS 0L

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 3:27 PM

Yeah, the Chicago grading system is pretty simple to grasp for anyone who still knows how to read numbers and letters and can refer to a scale that is printed on the transcript itself. Maybe that qualification excludes the graduates of pass/fail schools.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 3:28 PM

Oxford and Cambridge are both better than Harvard

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 3:31 PM

Oxford and Cambridge are both better than Harvard

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 3:32 PM

51, HLS doesn't have law students teach legal writing and research.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 3:43 PM

66 - epstein teaches at nyu every year and sunstein is actually a harvard prof now

78 Posted by Pacific Reporter | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 3:52 PM

Chicago >>> Berkeley.
Expect to see a dramatic decline in Berkeley's rank this year.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 4:05 PM

USNWR also thinks that NYU is better than Chicago, that Chicago and Penn are equivalent, and that Northwestern is better than Michigan and Virginia. It would be ridiculous for USNWR not to place Berkeley above Chicago, because then it be somehow tethered to reality.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 4:11 PM

78 & 79 = Chicago TTTrolls.

UPenn State >>> Chicago

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 4:17 PM

lol @ 80

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 4:34 PM

Honestly, I am a law student and am even fed up with the constant stream of grade and summer associate stories (i.e., the same story over and over again). I can't imagine how boring it must be for graduates. Let's make this thread into suggestions for better blogs.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 4:38 PM

NYU is not considering getting rid of grades, just changing it's curve.

And 66, NYU gets Epstein every fall:-) Contracts with Epstein was a...unique... experience. The man is awesome.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 7:10 PM

The recruiters at my old firm (Latham) liked the Chicago system a lot. Made it pretty easy to pick out the very top students as well as those in the top half.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 10:24 PM

NYU is not going to pass/fail. Just make the curve easier. Still letter grades.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 11:15 PM

University of Chig

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 11:16 PM

The U of C Law Grading system is very easy to decipher. the grading scale, with the equivalent letter grade on the back of the transcript. it's a no-brainer. any half-way intelligent recruiter can read a grading scale! It is a problem and U of C needs to move on with it. Dean Levmore who makes light of the pass/fail system benefited from that very system himself at Yale Law!

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 27, 2008 11:42 PM

Dear Voters,

Please pick the dumbest thing posted on this thread

1- Free market economics are TTT and outdated (39, 42, 43)
2- The U of C grading system is hard to figure out (OP)
3- The top 5% of Chicago students are "assholes."

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 28, 2008 12:05 AM

CLS IS NOT MOVING TO A PASS/FAIL SYSTEM. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT ATL!!

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 28, 2008 9:30 AM

berkeley will probably not remain ranked above chicago in next year's rankings. we'll live, but it was kind of fun to watch insecure UC students harp on the switchup ALL.. YEAR.. LONG. talk about your nervous t-10 students!

-- relaxed boalt student

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 31, 2008 9:57 AM

76, last time I did OCI at HLS, they did. But it's been a few years. If they now have practicing lawyers teaching reserach and writing (instead of 2nd years), that's a great development. Many schools have yet to make that change.

Post Your Comment