Add RSS RSS

Illinois To Follow Michigan's Attempt To Disregard The LSAT

illinois college of law.jpgLast month, we told you about the Wolverine scholars program. The program allows students with a 3.8 GPA at Michigan to bypass the LSAT when applying to Michigan Law School.

Apparently those exacting standards were too draconian for Illinois College of Law. They are now offering an Early Admission Program for Illinois college students that also allows them to bypass the LSAT:

The biggest differences between the two programs involve GPA and additional requirements. Applicants to the University of Michigan will require a 3.8 GPA, while applicants to the University of Illinois will need at least a 3.0 GPA.

However, the University of Michigan will not have separate additional requirements, while the University of Illinois will require additional essays and interviews.

Instant analysis after the jump.

A 3.0 GPA and no LSAT for admission into a top tier law school? To quote Seth Meyers and Amy Poehler, "really?" I suggested that Michigan's program was a way to game the U.S. News rankings (a charge Sarah Zearfoss, dean of admissions at UM Law, denies). But if anything, admitting students with a 3.0 GPA and no LSAT score would seem to hurt Illinois's rankings.

The median GPA at Illinois College of Law is 3.49, the median LSAT score is 164. Are they honestly saying that college students at Illinois (the 40th ranked University) who can only manage a GPA in the low threes should gain admission to the 27th best law school, without having to score in the mid-160s on the LSAT?

Oh, but there are "additional requirements."

"Not all GPAs are created equally," [Paul Pless, the law school's assistant dean for Admissions] said. "Even at U of I not all GPA is created equal. A 3.4 in electrical engineering is a good GPA. However, in my own major of political science, 3.4 is not towards the high end."

I thought the LSAT was a proxy for smoothing over some of these differences between the strength of one's undergraduate program, but apparently "essays and interviews" can do the trick just as well.

It's the cynicism of these programs that I find disturbing. A 3.0 at Illinois turns the LSAT into a useless metric for gaining admission into Illinois College of Law, but if you have a 3.0 at Northwestern the LSAT is suddenly very important again to Illinois deans.

And both Illinois's program and the Michigan version seem designed to help law schools much more than they help students:

Joe Hinchliffe, attorney and professor of political science, said he was concerned that undergraduates who wanted to pursue a law degree now might think they no longer need to take the LSAT. This would be a serious mistake, he added.

"If they are strong enough for an early admissions program, then they are probably strong enough for scholarships and other opportunities that they won't know about unless they take the LSAT," Hinchliffe said.

There are real problems with the LSAT as a tool for law school admissions, but I don't see how making up "pretend factors" helps anybody's cause.

UI changes law school admission program [DailyIllini]

Earlier: University Of Michigan Law School: Please Stop The Insanity

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:30 AM

first

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:36 AM

this is utterly not interesting to a nervous T-10 1L. i need more information about jobs this summer. i can't wait until my meeting on november 3rd with career services!

-nervous T-10 1L

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:36 AM

Guys at my high school used to maintain 3.0 GPAs all the time. It was no big deal.

- Prospective Illinois Law Student

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:38 AM

A 3.0 at U of I? They'll have thousands of kids in every class unless they are total interview flops. What a joke. Take the LSAT and pay your dues bitches.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:38 AM

Does any of this change the fact that A Law Degree from Illinois is not worth the money you pay for it?

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:39 AM

InsTTTant analysis? Srsly?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:39 AM

Illinois student: Save the Chief!

The rest of the world: You are a racist piece of excrement.

N.B. Illinois 45, Michigan 20

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:41 AM

I am still shocked that there has been no widespread use of class action litigation against the T3-T4 diploma mills that knowingly spew forth grads with heavy five- and six figure debt with little or no prospect of employment that has has a chance at allowing the debt to be paid off prior to old age.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:46 AM

Old news... where's the story on connecticut gay marriage?!

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:47 AM

7: Michigan T10, Illinois TTT

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:48 AM

8- assumption of the risk. I went to a T4, but I didn't have biglaw aspirations and instead pursued a career in government, which does hire from these lower tier schools. I also went to a cheap state school (12k/yr) and wasn't a jackass paying 45k/yr at NYLS for a shit degree. I got my shit degree for cheap and have a decent job with government, which once your in the "system" you can move up into more lucrative jobs after 5 yrs or so, and I will have significantly less debt.

Word to the wise: if you bagged on the LSATs like I did by being hungover in my junior year, not studying, and not retaking it, you get what you bargain for. Therefore, DONT GO TO AN EXPENSIVE T3-T4 because you WILL NOT get a job that will be able to make the payments.

Or do what I should have done and launder your LSAT by busting your ass for a year at a T4, get a 4.0 or close, and then transfer to a T1-T2 (if you live in CT, UConn is a top 50 and freely admits state residents with low LSATs)

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:48 AM

CT GAY MARRIAGE STORY PLZ

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:51 AM

This actually is BS. It will be even greater BS when everyone admitted through these programs just happens to be a minority and the UMich and Illinois LSAT numbers jump.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:56 AM

what lsat score do i need to guarantee me a spot in WILDMAN HARROLD's stop sign law department? does anyone know who reviews their applications? will it matter if my note on octagon visibility is scheduled for publication in the journal of ocular geomtry? please advise.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:57 AM

Penn state is going to do something similar for its JD/MBA program if students do the MBA fist and get a certain grade at the Warton school. I haven't heard what the grade is though.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:59 AM

They are also gaming the US News system in two ways. First they will get lot more applicants that they will reject. Second if one assumes that they want certain students with a 3.0 GPA from Illinois for affirmative action or legacy reasons, it makes sense that they don't also want those students correspondingly low LSAT scores. Don't think for a second that the average 3.0 student is going to get in without taking the LSAT and doing extremely well.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:59 AM

They are also gaming the US News system in two ways. First they will get lot more applicants that they will reject. Second if one assumes that they want certain students with a 3.0 GPA from Illinois for affirmative action or legacy reasons, it makes sense that they don't also want those students correspondingly low LSAT scores. Don't think for a second that the average 3.0 student is going to get in without taking the LSAT and doing extremely well.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:03 PM

Who is/are the asshole(s) that think(s) these Wildman Harold jokes are funny? Can you maybe enlighten the rest of us as to why you get such a kick out of that partcular firm?

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:04 PM

STFU with your provocative headline. You know full well that Michigan's program would only admit 5 people per year max.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:09 PM

Elie,

No one cares about your opinions (they are usually either stating the obvious or aren't particular well thought out or expressed). We care about being entertained. Expressing opinions is thus a means to an end. A frivolous opinion can be funny -- Lat was very good at this. On serious issues, try being more like a reporter (on the one hand . . ., on the other hand . . .). Multiple paragraphs of editorializing without any (well executed) attempts at levity are simply a waste of everyone's time. After all, the time we spend on ATL is generally procrastination time, not time spent trying to develop informed views on the admissions policies of various law schools.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:19 PM

5, considering I'm paying nothing for my Illinois degree and I'm getting paid $160k/year because of it, I'd say you're wrong.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:21 PM

As an Illinois student, I really hope the school raises the GPA minimum for this early application crap. Don't devalue my degree!

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:30 PM

5 is a contract attorney. Illinois is probably the cheapest T1 school in the nation and they do pretty well with large firm placement. My firm and many others in Chicago are crawling with Illinois law grads. Say what you want about Chicago or the midwest, but as long as its a major market paying 160, who the hell cares?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:30 PM

I second 21's comment. If you're an Illinois resident, it is hard to top the cheap state tuition and job opportunities that Illinois offers. That's true of most of the Big Ten law schools. Sure, going to Harvard at the cost is always going to be worth it, but there is definitely something to be said for graduating with minimal debt and still having ample BigLaw / judicial clerkship / other desirable job opportunities.

As for this program, I wouldn't be surprised to see all the Big Ten schools follow this path. While I don't personally like it as a Big Ten law grad, I think it makes sense for the Big Ten schools.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:34 PM

I went to Illinois and guess what....I make the same salary as the Harvard kid down the hall. The only difference is that I owe 100K less in loans.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:38 PM

is it possible for people who lack a sense of humor to get a job at WILDMAN HARROLD? i can't tell a hilarious joke from my butt, but my article on NATO's effect on the chili cheese dog trade got rave reviews from bratislava's leading authority on the regulation of flatulence-inducing gastronomy. please advise.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:40 PM

Elie -- you have a small brain. This program is probably not that big of a deal -- just like the Michigan program. They say you need a 3.0 to even be considered for the program. This is just an arbitrary cutoff before all the interviews, essays, etc. This is not equivalent to saying "Hey, you got a 3.0? Great! You can now come to Illinois College of Law!"

Quit trying to create mountains out of mole hills. Go find some real news. Nobody cares to read posts from the Elie Spin Zone.

MysTTal

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:41 PM

Will Penn State Philly Campus follow the Big Ten trend here?

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:43 PM

UI will NOT admit anyone with a 3.0 - thats simply a way for them to boost the applications that are denied. As an alum, I remember the school despising UI undergrads and preferring out of state students who paid more and performed better. Only UI undergrads with 3.7s were considered.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:45 PM

Elie -- you have a small brain. This program is probably not that big of a deal -- just like the Michigan program. They say you need a 3.0 to even be considered for the program. This is just an arbitrary cutoff before all the interviews, essays, etc. This is not equivalent to saying "Hey, you got a 3.0? Great! You can now come to Illinois College of Law!"

Quit trying to create mountains out of mole hills. Go find some real news. Nobody cares to read posts from the Elie Spin Zone.

MysTTal

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:47 PM

another outstanding post, but please tell me - what impact will this have on WILDMAN HARROLD's babysitting law practice area?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:49 PM

UPenn State-Philly is the premier public law school in the nation. If they adopt this, there is a real chance some Ivy law schools will follow.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:50 PM

I'd bypass the LSAT if KASH let me get to know her a little better. I bet she's a beast in the sack. Would love to see more of that rockin' bod.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:50 PM

This is a non-issue. The flexibility is essentially for engineering students, not for the mass population of students at the University. U. of I.'s engineering program is notoriously diffiult and on average takes 5 years to complete. A B+ average, as Mr. Pless stated is on the high end for an engineering student. With a class size of 175, I doubt many will be admitted anyway. Besides, as an alum, I can tell you that they are absolutely trying to game the rankings every way they can and there is no way they will lower the median G.P.A. for this program. They will not act against their self interest and if they do, the market (U.S. News & WR) will penalize them. Also, you might want to, unless you mistook this for an admissions board, focus on the job market.

HTH

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:52 PM

U MICH IS A SHIT SCHOOL IN A SHITHOLE OF A STATE SUCK MY MANTITS SARAH C ZEARFOSS!

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:52 PM

I'd bypass the LSAT if KASH let me get to know her a little better. I bet she's a beast in the sack. Would love to see more of that rockin' bod.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:52 PM

This is a non-issue. The flexibility is essentially for engineering students, not for the mass population of students at the University. U. of I.'s engineering program is notoriously diffiult and on average takes 5 years to complete. A B+ average, as Mr. Pless stated is on the high end for an engineering student. With a class size of 175, I doubt many will be admitted anyway. Besides, as an alum, I can tell you that they are absolutely trying to game the rankings every way they can and there is no way they will lower the median G.P.A. for this program. They will not act against their self interest and if they do, the market (U.S. News & WR) will penalize them. Also, you might want to, unless you mistook this for an admissions board, focus on the job market.

HTH

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:55 PM

Listen, I'm an engineer, and it DOES NOT take much to get over a measly 3.0. Even Illinois scoffs at averages that low in materials relating to graduate programs in Engineering:

http://online.engr.uiuc.edu/degrees/mechanical.htm

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:56 PM

Elie, the economy as we know it is spiraling downward. Is this the best you got?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:59 PM

38 did not go to Illinois. All engineers are not created equally.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 12:59 PM

I can't imagine anyone avoiding the LSAT just for the chance at this, because you have no idea how many students will be admitted under the program, and the only school you could possibly go to would be Illinois. Just take the damn test, fools!

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:01 PM

38: How was the engineering program at Indiana State University? Cutting edge stuff, eh?

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:02 PM

Yeah, Illinois is so much harder than MIT. Only Einstein can get that 3.0.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:03 PM

41 - My thoughts exactly. Nobody will not take the LSAT to have a remote chance to get into Illinois.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:07 PM

38 - lol @ mechanical. Electrical = 10(Mechanical)

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:08 PM

This is not about engineers. This is about boosting the number of applications and sneaking in URM's without reporting their LSAT scores. Love how these TTT Illinois law grads try to pretend like there is nothing underhanded about this.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:09 PM

Anybody looking to rip on Illinois Engineering is just out of their mind. It's a giant state school and it's nearly as good as Cal, MIT, Carnegie, etc. for many engineering disciplines.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:10 PM

U-Penn State Philly Campus early action policy will only apply to students from the University Park campus and not those from the satellite campus.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:11 PM

22 - I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but your Illinois (read: TTT) degree wasn't worth shit before Illinois adopted this new admission policy. Michigan is the only one who stands a chance of devaluing their degree, but because of the stringent requirements of their policy, that won't happen. Simply put, Illinois law is pure trash. Enjoy your horrendous career prospects, cockneck.

-SLS 3L

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:13 PM

$160k: UM top 90%; UofI top 10%.

(Yes, yes: Juice >> Threet.)

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:30 PM

50: is it really that bad? I'm at another Illinois law school and I get the sense that most U of I types can land BigLaw if they're in the top third. Their firm might not be Kirkland, but the Chicago market is commodious, and most NU/Chicago (mostly the latter) types go elsewhere.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:31 PM

22 - You are a pompous self-important ass. I hope I get to kick your ass some day.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:31 PM

49 (NOT 22) - You are a pompous self-important ass. I hope I get to kick your ass some day.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:32 PM

Juice >>>>>>>>> Threet

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:36 PM

Also, 50, I think that you severely underestimate the Illinois alumni network. It's probably stronger than UChicago's and at least as strong as Northwestern's. I'm an Illinois native and it seems like everyone went to Champaign *at some point*: your kid brother, a neighbor, some guy you met at the Jewel while buying produce, et cetera.

That said, I don't go to Illinois, and I don't know how it would fare in this economy. But I think that, as long as you go back to Chicago, it can't be a bad deal, especially with cheap in-state tuition.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:37 PM

51, your sense has no relation to reality.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:41 PM

56 - Have you ever touched a woman? ... Or a man for that matter?

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:42 PM

48, I think your confusing two school??

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:54 PM

"Illinois's program"

Really??????

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:58 PM

another outstanding post, but please tell me - what impact will this have on WILDMAN HARROLD's babysitting law practice area?

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:01 PM

tell me about teh wildman harrold meme

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:03 PM

Does Wildman Harold recruit at UPenn State-Philly?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:15 PM

I don't understand the Wildman meme, either. One of my friends is actually leaning toward working for them, so perhaps I should suggest otherwise thanks to ATL.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:16 PM

@21: What was your class rank?

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:17 PM

Re: Wildman Harrold

It's just some tool who thinks that the law firm's name is hilarious. And he's right.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:19 PM

Ok, I never comment on here but I have noticed a trend that is worth noting:

Every time that Michigan is mentioned in a negative way on this site the comments inevitably contain a string of comments pretending to mistakenly conflate the University of Pennsylvania with Penn State.

Is it possible, just possible, that insecure students are attempting to take the heat off of their own school by making a lame, overused joke about another school?

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:19 PM

Ok, I never comment on here but I have noticed a trend that is worth noting:

Every time that Michigan is mentioned in a negative way on this site the comments inevitably contain a string of comments pretending to mistakenly conflate the University of Pennsylvania with Penn State.

Is it possible, just possible, that insecure students are attempting to take the heat off of their own school by making a lame, overused joke about another school?

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:21 PM

67, the connection is a lot more obvious than that: both Michigan and Penn are state schools with prominent football programs. That's why they're always mentioned together on this site.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:23 PM

Hey Illinois Grads -- Have fun slaving over your crappy med mal "work."

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:23 PM

66 here with one more comment:

Michigan is an excellent school. Anyone who goes there should be proud. I am just saying that the Penn jokes are ridiculous.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:24 PM

7 - Michigan football will be better next year, but Illinois will still suck.

- smug Michigan 1L

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:25 PM

7 - Michigan football will be better next year, but Illinois will still suck.

- smug Michigan 1L

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:27 PM

71 - Plz watch last week's game. K, thnkz.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:32 PM

73 - It's "k thx," asshole. People messing up kitteh is almost as bad as people messing up FRAT STUD.

- Not 71/72

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:35 PM

I have to comment.

Elie, as you seem to be aware of, this policy does not make sense from a US News bumping standpoint. You still conclude, however, that this is like Michigan's attempt to bump their rankings. How could it possibly be an attempt at that? This is not a sinister maneuver, it is an attempt to keep students more students in-state.

Let me explain. Illinois, as a state, makes large investments in its students from K-college. In particular when the state is giving these students cheap college tuition, Illinois wants something back. Most Illinois law students stay and work in Illinois. Illinois, as a state, therefore has an incentive to steer their undergraduate investments into the law school, which is likely to keep them in state, returning on the investment in their previous schooling. Stacking the law school with students from out of state, on the other hand, excludes the in-state investments. Moreover, it brings in students who are more likely to leave after their law school education is complete. Illinois, as a state, would much rather give a law student cheap tuition in exchange for them staying in state after they graduate than collect higher tuition from someone who will leave.

This is not a US News tactic. It has very little in common with Michigan's policy.

This is elementary, Elie. You have the deductive reasoning of a Down Syndrome baby.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:36 PM

All the "TTT"ing and "T14"ing and "T10"ing will not erase the fact that you elitist bitches make the same salary as I do and have to pay a couple thousand a month for the next 20 years. Epic fail.

-Top maybe 40% 2L making 3100/wk next summer.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:43 PM

All the "TTT"ing and "T14"ing and "T10"ing will not erase the fact that you elitist bitches make the same salary as I do and have to pay a couple thousand a month for the next 20 years. Epic fail.

-Top maybe 40% 2L making 3100/wk next summer.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:44 PM

76 = TTT. 40 years from now, you'll be able to say "38 years ago I made as much as Harvard/Michigan/Cornell grads." Congratulations.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:44 PM

All the "TTT"ing and "T14"ing and "T10"ing will not erase the fact that you elitist bitches make the same salary as I do and have to pay a couple thousand a month for the next 20 years. Epic fail.

-Top maybe 40% 2L making 3100/wk next summer.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:50 PM

79 = TTT

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:53 PM

What percentage of T14 grads are dbags? Based on my exposure to them on ATL, I would guess at least 70 percent.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:54 PM

ZOOK >>> DICK ROD

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 3:07 PM

81 - You're underestimating.

- T14 grad, part-time online d-bag

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 3:15 PM

Bo > Carr > Zook > Dick Rod > Holtz > Weis

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 3:21 PM

76 - Your TTT ass may be making the same $160,000 as a first year associate, but I'd be willing to bet that you won't be at a V20 firm; instead, you'll be at some joke of a TTT firm in a TTT market. Oh, and I wouldn't be bragging about your ability to make $3,100/week NEXT summer. If you haven't noticed, the market has gone to shit and a TTT student like you has a much greater chance of getting your offer rescinded than a T-14 student. Also, there is a strong likelihood that you will get no-offered by your summer associate firm because your writing skills and general ability is consistent with your TTT status. That is all, you cockneck.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 3:27 PM

85 - True. Nicely done.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 3:58 PM

81 FTW

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 4:02 PM

85 = insecure

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 4:18 PM

I think 85 is also 49. Either that, or "cockneck" is a much more common diss than I thought. In any case, dude sucks.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 4:24 PM

81 -

In all seriousness, people act very differently online than they do in person. I don't think you can read anything into what people post online. Most of the condescension on ATL is shtick.

Of course a T14 grad (i.e. non-fucktard) would know this.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 4:53 PM

Illinois rules. I got a very nice 2.8 in the engineering program, and now I'm on the IP highway to 160k despite my TTT law school and bottom half grades.

UI Engineers to 190k!

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 5:37 PM

well played, 90

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 6:58 PM

Uh,

The median GPA is actually 3.59 and median LSAT is 166.

http://www.law.uiuc.edu/global/classprofiles.asp

Elie you're supposed to fact check before posting. 1 demerit.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 7:10 PM

90--
So you're saying T14 grads are not only fucktards, but cowards as well, requiring the anonymity of the internet to express their fucktarditude?

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 8:28 PM

94 -

My thoughts exactly.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 8:30 PM

Illinois Grads >= T14 Grads

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 9:46 PM

Please, give it up you pathetic Illinois fucks.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 10:20 AM

35 -- Rejection letters are already going out?

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 11:27 AM

You have to also remember that this is the helicopter generation. These kids are so used to being handed everything and that if their 3.0 GPA in applied jacking isn't enough, Mommy and Daddy will make a phone call and write a check.

The Baby-Boomers always said they wanted to change the world. They have. They have wrecked it financially and raised a generation of children that can't cope with Big-Boy life. I can't wait to get these half-wits in court.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 1:44 PM

99 - crotchety old Baby Boomer who just got laid off from Wildman Harrold's penis pump products liability department.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 2:11 PM

100-bitter helicopter child who only got a 3.0 in Applied Jacking due to injury suffered from defective penis pump.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 5:18 PM

85: Full of shit. Ceteris Paribus, the name on your degree means little in deciding whether or not to offer someone. Your work product and attitude are far more meaningful, and we all know T14ers have no advantage in either of those.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 11:27 PM

obviously, this is the way to boost minority enrollment

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 12, 2008 3:16 PM

78 = Cornell troll

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 12, 2008 4:53 PM

102 - Reread 85's post you stupid fuck. The central point was that a TTT student has a much greater likelihood of getting his offer rescinded prior to the start of the summer. Work product and attitude are unknown until the TTT cockneck starts work. You sir, are a TTT fuckneck.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 12, 2008 6:15 PM

What the hell is University of Pennsylvania State Philly?

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 13, 2008 12:18 AM

Wait Wait Wait. People on here brag about their schools? That's how you determine your self worth? That's fuckin hilarious, I love it!

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 13, 2008 11:50 PM

Dean Smith: Shut this program down! If you have ANY desire to preserve our ranking and prestige, please do not allow people who don't know how to work hard in a short period of time, studying for a horribly difficult test, to attend our school. The Bar exam, and even practice require the capacity to force yourself to do extreme amounts of work in a short period of time. If we have people at our school who can't do that, they won't be able to pass the bar exam or get a job. Please, stop this program!

Signed,
An Alumni at a Big Firm

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:40 AM

Why all the "TTT"? Illinois is in the first tier (rank 27), not the third tier. Or does the "TTT" label simply apply to any school ranked lower than your own? Does Harvard get to call Yale a TTT?

Post Your Comment