Add RSS RSS

Law Firm Merger Mania:
Allen & Overy + Shearman & Sterling = A&S&S??

law firm merger small.jpgThe Lawyer reports that Allen & Overy might be in merger talks with Shearman & Sterling:

A&O is occasionally tempted by the thought of a market-busting merger. It approached Freshfields back in 2006, as exclusively revealed in The Lawyer (see story).

Senior partner David Morley is moving to New York next week for three months (see story). This is being taken in New York as proof that a deal is in the offing.

A&O has nicked a whole load of Shearman’s Germans - though by rights this ought to rule out a deal with the rest of the firm.

Shearman needs help. (Actually, this is incontrovertible.)

After the jump, could this actually happen?

This would be a mega-deal. Let me translate the rumor into American English so everybody can play along:

A&O gotta eat and Shearman needs to get the paper. OG D-More already ganked the Heinekens and now he’s coming for the whole store. Holla back.

We previously reported that Allen & Overy is a revenue monster. They ranked 6th on the recently released Global 100 firms in terms of revenue. Shearman & Sterling ranked 25th on the same list, but that was down from their 2007 ranking.

Many tipsters think that A&O is in a very secure position. One tipster reports:

[W]e posted over $2 billion in revenue, had more profit coming from non-London offices than ever in the past, and continued to make ground on global elite competitors with 17% growth in profits out of New York this past year.

Meanwhile, Shearman is generally thought to be facing strong headwinds. They dropped precipitously in the Vault rankings this year, down to 19th. But they are still a major player. They represented Merrill Lynch in the recent BoA / Merrill merger.

A huge deal like this might make up for all the merger rumors that have failed to pan out.

A&O, Shearman to merge? [The Lawyer]

Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of law firm mergers

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:01 PM

firsty

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:03 PM

WHICH FIRMS ARE GETTING THE CITI / WELLS FARGO / WACHOVIA LITIGATION BUSINESS?

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:07 PM

Although this seems speculative, is there any indication whether A&O will be acquiring S&S's NY office or whether the firms' offices will be merging.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:08 PM

Hey, it spells out "A S S!"

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

Elie's sense of humor rules!

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:08 PM

2, Shearman & Shearman & Sterling reps one of them.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:08 PM

2 - sullcrom, wachtell, boies schiller, and dpw

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:10 PM

Elie Mystal is so fat Sarah Palin can see him from Alaska.

Elie Mystal is so fat John McCain opposed him as wasteful pork.

Elie Mystal is so fat Joe Biden said "That's not change, that's a LOT more of the same."

Elie Mystal is so fat he owes the IRS over $200,000 in back fat taxes.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:10 PM

2 - David Boies

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:10 PM

Heineken is not German.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:13 PM

merger is laugher.

2 - Greg Joseph (formerly of FF) is counsel to Citi

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:15 PM

Who is representing Wachovia?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:15 PM

This is pure b.s. And I don't know who said S&S is facing strong headwind -- S&S has been involved in a bunch of huge deals recently (Dow, Merrill, Hexion, ...) and people are generally pretty busy.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:15 PM

Elie Mystal's attempt to sound ghetto is so pathetic it makes Barack Obama look three quarters black. Holla back.

-7

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:16 PM

O'Melveny & Meyers isn't really a player in this market, but they sure have some hot associates:

http://www.omm.com/brookecucinella/

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:24 PM

14: I'm sorry this girl won't date you, give the time of day, or potentially just screwed you over in a way that was different from what you wanted. But, you should stop trying to harrass her via ATL.

avatar
17 Posted by thehandsyoushakenotthegradesyoumake | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:26 PM

"But they are still a major player."

Where's the comma?

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:29 PM

Can you PLEASE ditch that fricking "Tying the Knot" picture? It wasn't funny the first time, and it certainly doesn't need to be run on every merger article.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:30 PM

Elie Mystal is so fat when he lays around the house it takes up two states.

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/suffolk/ny-limyst0916,0,1055583.story

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:31 PM

16: I doubt 14 has ever met her. Instead, he probably just doesn't get out much and to him beauty is a novelty.

I considered writing something meaner, but I think that really does the job well enough.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:33 PM

Seriously, complain about writing style, story choices, blatant partisan attacks that have nothing to do with the law, but there is no need to make ad hominem attacks about Elie's weight.

Commenters on this blog have odd fixations (and taste) when it comes to looks. One person today pretended he sees at least 20 hot women a day in Manhatten. Let's not kid ourselves. And now, attorneys want to attack Elie as if that particular commenter has six pack abs, all of his hair, and is not throwing around money and an ivy league degree on a Friday night in an effort to impress because he knows he loses on attractiveness.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:36 PM

20: 16 here, and you're probably right. I gave the guy too much credit. And, I applaud your restraint.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:42 PM

LMFAO at Heineken supposedly being German, unless the S&S netherlands office is what we're talking about here?

Were you trying to say "Heinrich"? Either way please correct before 800 subsequent commeners call for you to be draw & quartered.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:42 PM

As far as I could tell from the Vault rankings, SS moved up to 14 from 15. Can Elie be this bad?

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:45 PM

STB - wachovia

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:45 PM

16, 20, & 22 = same guy; just wanted someone to tell him nice pwn for once. Well done, sir, well done.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:46 PM

24 - you need to check the 2009 rankings.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:48 PM

does FDIC have counsel in this Wachovia thing?

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:51 PM

14 - you're a tool for sweating a 6.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:51 PM

21 - What? How can you spend ~10 hours in Manhattan and NOT see 20 hot women? Where do you hang out?

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:54 PM

23: irony?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:57 PM

30- aren't we all hanging out in our offices?

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:58 PM

AllenSherman.com is gone.
Hmmmmmm!

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 4:58 PM

I heard that Wachovia, Citi, and the FDIC all tried to hire WILDMAN HARROLD.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 5:02 PM

why is it incontrovertible that shearman needs help? everyone hates on shearman, but nobody explains exactly why

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 5:05 PM

33: Allen Sherman was the original Weird Al. Grow Elie Mystal, fatter, fatter, pile the potatoes on your platter....

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 5:18 PM

It's also shearman not sherman

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 5:18 PM

It's also shearman not sherman

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 5:33 PM

21: The "one person today" was me, and I didn't say "hot." I might see 1-3 "hot" (9+) girls in a normal work day, and 20+ pretty (7+) girls.

I used to have abs, now a very slighty belly. Still have all of my hair. I definitely don't throw around money, because there's always a cute girl who'll go home with you for free, or (more often than you'd think) buy you drinks. And, I don't have an Ivy League education.

But really, come on, Elie Mystal has more fat the revised bailout. I'd tell you to just get over it, but I doubt your mountain climbing skills are that good.

-7 (and also 20)

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 5:37 PM

39: 21 here and I wasn't really referring to you when I was making statements about bald, pudgy, throw-money-around-ivy lawyers. I was more referring to the ones who make statements about banging Kash, etc. Also, I can definitely appreciate your pun about mountain climbing skills. I'm fairly fit, but everyone has to know their limits.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 5:44 PM

where is all this talk about problems at shearman coming from??? i havent heard a thing...

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 5:50 PM

Can anybody offer anything a little bit more credible as to whether this is legit? I'm considering offers for next summer from both of these firms and would really appreciate any help anyone can provide.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 5:58 PM

41 - S&S was ranked 8 in the Vault guide in 2001 vault guide and is now at 19 (note that no other firm has left the V10 since). Also, last summer they way over-hired.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 6:01 PM

43 - so how bad would you say it is, outside of the vault rankings. is a summer offer from them worthless?

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 6:02 PM

what are the reasons behind their huge fall in ranking?

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 6:15 PM

45 - they fired 10% (or more) of their associates during the 2001 downturn. turned out to be not such a great move in the long run.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 6:54 PM

So a fall in Vault ranking is the prime reason why S&S should pursue a merger? Don't be ridiculous.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 7:15 PM

46 - I can't believe people still mention the 2001 layoffs. Skadden did the same, as did many firms.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 7:36 PM

I wish Elie had posted the full article from the Lawyer's website. Despite their claims to having "excellent evidence," it seems like this is nothing but hot air (or British tabloid sensationalism). Judge for yourselves.

Allen & Overy in talks with Shearman & Sterling?

We're only asking.

The rumours in New York are beginning to mount. Shearman sources deny it, though another source close to the firm did admit that "it would make good sense". Another spluttered: "there is absolutely nothing there."

In the meantime, we've rustled up some excellent evidence.

A&O is occasionally tempted by the thought of a market-busting merger. It approached Freshfields back in 2006, as exclusively revealed in The Lawyer (see story).

Senior partner David Morley is moving to New York next week for three months (see story). This is being taken in New York as proof that a deal is in the offing.

A&O has nicked a whole load of Shearman's Germans - though by rights this ought to rule out a deal with the rest of the firm.

Shearman needs help. (Actually, this is incontrovertible.)

No wonder half of New York is cheering A&O on from the sidelines. And they say the Brits are gossips.

Go, David, go!

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 7:47 PM

I can only speak as a law student, but at my t-10 Shearman is the ultimate backup. Nobody shoots for it, they only settle for it.

It has a very poor reputation for quality of life, and very low prestige amongst law students.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 8:49 PM

shearman is my first choice and i'm at a t5.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 9:43 PM

Whatever happened to S&S's Menlo Park office? Seems like it never got larger. I thought they were trying to build an IP lit practice there, but then all IP lit partners left and Vicki Veenker, the sole remaining holdout, was de-equitized and stays on as of counsel while she is GC of a pro women's soccer league.

Anyone have the scoop? Thanks.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 9:50 PM

16, 20, 22: Nicely done. 14 is a total scum. And what a pointless post. It's not like there aren't plenty of other hot women at OMM:

http://www.omm.com/lizdubeck/

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 10:05 PM

51: must have terrible grades/personality and a healthy dose of denial.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 10:29 PM

54 didn't get the offer from Shearman- tough luck pal

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 11:15 PM

Nah--54 has it right. Shearman is an unselective shithole

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 11:40 PM

Guess 56 didnt either

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 11:49 PM

How do you guys think this would affect the culture of A&O's New York office. I have heard great things about its culture but horrible things about S&S's.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 12:10 AM

52. They're building that office around their hot shot tax partner and his practice.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 12:32 AM

Wow, who knew S&S had rejected so many frustrated law students this year. Tough luck losers.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 12:48 AM

58 - Great things? Look they are profitable, but I know 2 associates who billed over 2300 hours last year and they are f'n miserable. It doesn't matter where you work, if you are billing 2300 hours a year your firm doesn't have "great culture" regardless of how many times they wipe your ass for you when you go to the bathroom

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 1:11 AM

How is Clifford Chance doing in NY after the merger with Roger & Wells?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 1:20 AM

RE 61:
In the Mid-Level Associates Survey they rate so well, I think like 15 or so. I have heard that they have relatively laid back hours relative to most firms. In fact, the survey listed an average of 54 hours/week worked which seems pretty nice compared to some other firms. Would you disagree?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 9:20 AM

I like the name Sterling Overy myself. Perhaps they could pick up some surrogate-motherhood business.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 9:22 AM

shearman hands out callbacks like halloween candy, but they are stingy with offers. i'm at a t-10, and they gave around 10 offers to mostly LR people.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 10:33 AM

60
Judging by their class size, they didn't reject anybody this year.

65
If that's true, then those 10 LR people must have turned down their crappy offers for DP and Shearman filled in those spots with a few more summers from Fordham.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 10:55 AM

Judging by their summer class size last year, a huge number of people wanted to work for Shearman (i.e. much more than they anticipated). 66 is in denial

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 10:56 AM

Judging by their summer class size last year, a huge number of people wanted to work for Shearman (i.e. much more than they anticipated). 66 is in denial

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 11:42 AM

I used to have abs, now a very slighty belly.
__________________________________________

Are you from India? Your diction seems very Indian.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 1:34 PM

61 - 54 billable hours a week? Do the math... 56 weeks times 54 billable hours = 2,740 billable hours a year... and if you meant 54 hours a week... period, between billable and not billable... well that my friend is a myth anywhere in biglaw.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 1:38 PM

61 - 54 billable hours a week? Do the math... 56 weeks times 54 billable hours = 3,024 (mistyped it into the calculator) billable hours a year... and if you meant 54 hours a week... period, between billable and not billable... well that my friend is a myth anywhere in biglaw.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 1:42 PM

Except that there are only 52 weeks in a year here on earth. Well-executed criticism there, 71.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 1:49 PM

and you have to take into account vacation weeks

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 1:53 PM

Vacation at most big-law shops? Bahaha.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 7, 2008 1:53 PM

71 works at DLA Piper where he or she was denied a bonus for failing to work the required 56 hours a year.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 8, 2008 4:11 AM

59 you are hilarious.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 12:14 AM

LOL,
New to the scene - loving "ATL" - it makes second year law go a lot faster. I have accepted an offer at Shearman, and pretty happy about it. People there seem to enjoy their work and their lives.

Can someone explain what the bias is against Shearman? Why have people not liked it in the past?

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 12:16 AM

LOL,
New to the scene - loving "ATL" - it makes second year law go a lot faster. I have accepted an offer at Shearman, and pretty happy about it. People there seem to enjoy their work and their lives.

Can someone explain what the bias is against Shearman? Why have people not liked it in the past?

Post Your Comment