Add RSS RSS

Layoff Update: Jenner & Block

Jenner Block LLP logo Abovethelaw Above the Law legal tabloid.JPGThere are a couple of updates to this morning’s post about the 10 Jenner & Block partners that have been laid off.

Many people emailed us claiming that six associates were also let go. And there are six associate bios that we expected to see that are no longer on the firm website. But the firm maintains that no associates will be leaving with the partners:

Jenner & Block did not recently lay off six associates and does not plan to do so in the near future.

We have a long-standing policy of not publicly commenting on individual personnel matters. As in all law firms, associates join and leave the Firm for various reasons. Some of the associates who have left this year have joined clients as in-house lawyers, some have returned to school, some have joined other law firms. Associates also leave to join the government, work for not-for-profit organizations or personal reasons. Some associates are asked to leave due to performance.

As we’ve suggested before, not every associate departure is a “layoff.” Natural attrition and simple poor performance can cause any individual person to leave a firm. Jenner not only denied the specific associate layoff rumors that we have heard, they also essentially promised that associates were safe. That’s a stronger response than some other firms have offered.

We’ll keep an eye out for “performance reviews” that start to look like patterns.

But is the partner bloodletting finished? After the jump.

Another source reports that partners might still be on the chopping block:

[L]ikely to see more [partners leaving], with significant de-equitization and re-allocation of equity. People at the firm are PISSED that [managing partner Susan] Levy is talking to the press before addressing the firm. The original number we heard was 30. … [A]nyone not in line with the “new regime” [could be] in trouble.

This report is just a rumor. But it is another data point that suggests the “don’t worry be happy” firm meeting was a bit overstated.

Keep your heads on a swivel. More layoff news involving more firms is bound to come forward.

Earlier: Nationwide Layoff Watch: Jenner & Block Cuts … Partners
From the Department of Anticlimax: Jenner & Block

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:49 PM

FIRST!!!!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:51 PM

What about Foley and Lardner? we need an update.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:52 PM

1, 2 here. I am first!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:53 PM

for the love of god, at least acknowledge the skadden dc rumors.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:54 PM

Any news about Sagman, Bennett, Robbins, Oppenheim and Taft?

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:55 PM

Who cares about Jenner & Block? It's a 3 office, TTT, small matter/small rate firm. This blog is supposed to be about "BigLaw" and the related job market, not about every crappy firm that happens to fire a partner or two. You suck Mystal, seriously.

LONG LIVE SKADDEN!!!!!

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:58 PM

Elie,

This is so frustrating, it is amazing how crap you are at your job.

Why no follow up on Dechert post, or another Rumor post, that deals with Skadden, Dechert, Charlotte firms in general. That so hard?

Do you only ever post something when a firm gives you a release or a "spokesperson' tells you something on the record? And must you always accept it without question? Report without comment if you must but lines like 'As we've suggested before, not every associate departure is a "layoff." Natural attrition and simple poor performance can cause any individual person to leave a firm.' suggest you are closer to the reported than the reader. We need you to challenge those we cannot because we are nerd associates chained to a desk reading your blog looking for some signs that firms that screw associates are at least being dragged over the coals.

If you agree that ATL should follow up on firms, and should focus on layoffs instead of lawschools, let it be known in these comments.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:58 PM

6: "LONG LIVE SKADDEN"...at least for now. Too bad that doesn't get any coverage here.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:59 PM

The fired J&B lawyers must have been in the "structured finance" or "M&A" practice areas.

You know structured finance: move money around in a paper transaction that has no business purpose, other than to move debt or shit assets off the balance sheet. Then, collect a fee.

Investment bankers + big law transactional/finance types = a royal raping of the taxpayer.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:00 PM

NINTH

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:00 PM

Associates are fungible. Laid off associates will get three months severance and be recycled elsewhere. (Whether it be another law firm or as a Walmart greeter.) Such are the facts of life.

I really don't see what the fuss is all about. There are worse things than being laid off.

Use your severance payment to become a scuba diving instructor in Florida.

~In House Counsel

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:00 PM

7: HERE, HERE!

What is law school, anyway?

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:01 PM

7: HERE, HERE!

What is law school, anyway?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:02 PM

MysTTTal

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:06 PM

An economy based on 70 percent consumption eventually will falter and fail. People cannot consume indefinitely. People also can consume capital which is also not a good thing (tm).

Lawyers don't produce anything so it is not a great surprise that they get shafted at the first downturn of the consumption economy.

Enjoy being one of the poors.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:07 PM

5,

If you are going to quote Seinfeld, get it right.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:11 PM

16,

Yes, Art Vandelay, I'll get it right the next time.

In the meantime, NO SOUP FOR YOU!

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:11 PM

Question: Are firms that are in the 250-500 lawyer range, which focus almost exclusively on litigation in a different boat than all the firms that dumped tons of resources in the "structured finance" capital markets groups for the past few years? I used to think so, but doesn't Jenner do almost ALL litigation?

Thoughts?

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:11 PM

Question: Are firms that are in the 250-500 lawyer range, which focus almost exclusively on litigation in a different boat than all the firms that dumped tons of resources in the "structured finance" capital markets groups for the past few years? I used to think so, but doesn't Jenner do almost ALL litigation?

Thoughts?

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:12 PM

Question: Are firms that are in the 250-500 lawyer range, which focus almost exclusively on litigation in a different boat than all the firms that dumped tons of resources in the "structured finance" capital markets groups for the past few years? I used to think so, but doesn't Jenner do almost ALL litigation?

Thoughts?

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:14 PM

18, 19, & 20 -- shut the hell up. You're too stupid to work in litigation.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:15 PM

15,
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:15 PM

Skadden DC is fine. I'm sure the Skadden Insider blog would have let us know immediately if anything was amiss.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:15 PM

Elie, what about giving the readers what they want, an actual follow up on Dechert.

Say, Dechert - Rumors of Layoffs Continue.

Despite our weakass acceptance of Dechert's pitiful piece of PR, rumors continue on our site that Dechert has laid off large number of associates and will do so in the future. We have reached out to Dechert for further comment, but they bitchclapped us and told us that they would not answer any of our stinking questions. We followed up with our Dechert contacts who said something may be going on, but it is hard to track exact numbers. We also thought of contacting ehadhunters and partners at other firms in Philly and NY to see if there was a rise of Dechert resumes.....

You know, do actual work and keep pressure on Dechert while also making your loyal readers happy.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:16 PM

21: what?

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:16 PM

21: what?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:16 PM

21: what?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:18 PM

Firms that are more litigation oriented, big or small, are likely much more insulated from the the immediate fallout....granted, anything can happen, but straight commercial litigation will continue as usual

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:19 PM

18/19/20/25/26/27: Did you miss the following?

After submitting a comment it may take several minutes to appear. Please only submit your comment once.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:20 PM

Hey, Billy Madison showed up.

Good work 22.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:25 PM

6:
How is a V55 firm with close to 500 lawyers not biglaw?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:26 PM

I rely on Skadden Insider for all of my news. Too bad it is written by a GULC student living in his mom's basement. Suck it.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:29 PM

Don't feed the skadden trolls, 31.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:30 PM

I guess King &Spalding is attritioning the hell out of itself then. Damn.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:31 PM

WHERE WILL SUSPECTED TERRORISTS, CHILD RAPISTS ON DEATH ROW, AND SODOMITES GET LEGAL COUNSEL FROM??????? IF JENNER IS DYING, THERE IS NO LIBERTY!!!!!!!

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:34 PM

If Jenner dies what happens to Kim Kardashian's ass?

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:34 PM

Skadden Troll hungry...........no seriously ... I am hungry .....the soup lines in DC are getting really long.....

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:35 PM

Jenner & Block? Is that like Jacoby & Meyers?

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:37 PM

Just remember the definition of "poor performance" may have something to do "no work in the office". Are you busy? No performance = poor performance.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:39 PM

Nice, 36.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:42 PM

the only firm that will never have layoffs is williams & connolly. they have been very conservative (eg, didn't pay 200k to any swingin d*ck 25 y/o associate who didn't know the difference b/w a stock and a bond, while expecting clients to pay for that crap), they focused on their core competency, and they hired the best and the brightest while resisting the urge to over-grow. as cravath went around hiring 160 summers, w&c has been steady and reasonable.

there will be a bloodletting everywhere else -- stealth or otherwise. yes, even vault 5. vault 5 right now is like the coyote in road runner -- they're still moving forward over the cliff b/c of the momentum from cleaning up the mess. but once that work goes away, they will stop suddenly, look down, frown, and fall very quickly.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:45 PM

It was a good run Skadden DC. So sorry about your little pink website.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:47 PM

seriously -- what's going on at skadden dc??

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:48 PM

Little pink website? Wtf does that mean?

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:51 PM

Sorry about the auto-ding you received from there 42.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:51 PM

MysTTTal.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:53 PM

na na na na
na na na na
hey hey hey
CHEESE

Oh, and PEANUTS.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:53 PM

HEARD A RUMOR THAT DLA PIPER IS BREAKING UP INTO 7 SMALLER FIRMS -- ONE FOR EACH CONTINENT.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:54 PM

HEARD A RUMOR THAT DLA PIPER IS BREAKING UP INTO 7 SMALLER FIRMS -- ONE FOR EACH CONTINENT.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:55 PM

i just started my own shop in the Bay area. will i be ok? should i lay myself off?

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:56 PM

Crickets ...........ding ................crickets.........

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:56 PM

50:

Yes. You heard it here first.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:58 PM

50 - only if you are a timekeeper, in which case you should "separate" yourself from the firm. Then, your zero person firm can throw a dissolution party with Heller Ehrman!

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:06 PM

HARVARD BEST IN ASIA!

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:06 PM

IceMiller is going to buy Dechert.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:11 PM

Jesus Christ, they've got a WOMAN running the firm?? No wonder things are going downhill. I've heard their menstrual blood attracts bears too. You hear that - Bears - you're putting the whole firm at risk.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:13 PM

women = TTT

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:28 PM

sooooooo nervous :(

-nervous T-10 1L

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:40 PM

Company line or not, if associates weren't shown the door with the partners, they will be next week . . . or next month.

Enough of this story, though. Show me more carnage.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:41 PM

T-10 1L... set your sights a little higher than Jenner. If you wanted to go there, you should have gone to Loyola and saved yourself 150K.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:44 PM

This just in. Economy is cyclical. Law firms also cyclical. More work if boom. Less work if bust. Don't work at TTT. Well-managed firms can still keep everyone relatively busy, even if not 2000 billable busy. If you can't manage your firm, hire an MBA that can.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:44 PM

Associate layoffs at Mayer Brown

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:54 PM

Sorry about your little pink website, bro. That sucks.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 7:04 PM

I don't mean to split hairs, but Skadden's website is really, really red much like Mystal is really really fat.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 7:18 PM

Tell us more, 62

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 7:28 PM

Yes, 62, please come over here and lay on this couch and tell us more.
Hmmmm, interesting.....
OK.... I figured out what is wrong with you. You were GULCed as a child and are now resentful of said GULCing.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 7:30 PM

53 - You are "hilarious." I bet you spend all "day" thinking up what to say on ATL. Practicing "law" is the perfect profession for you. "Best."

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 7:36 PM

crickets..........

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 7:58 PM

right now my practice is booming and my salary overfloweth....but i am saving as much as i can for the days when i might not be making 600-800K....no job is forever, no client is forever, etc.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:21 PM

41 -- you work at W&C, or just have a hard-on for it? If you work there, you should be billing at 5:42 pm, not farting around on ATL.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:22 PM

9, please go back to Main Street, find the library, and start reading up on economics.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:25 PM

I had a summer associate suck my cock in the firm library after a cocktail hour this past summer. No joke. I've succeeded in life and do not care if I am laid off.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:28 PM

Is it true that King & Spald are shifting focus north and reducing ATL or is it just some stupid GULC comment?

C'ville ipsa

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:59 PM

72 - was he laid off? ;)

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:11 PM

74 - Well played.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:18 PM

Mayer Brown has been stealthy laying people off for weeks...... in anticipation of lawsuits I would imagine

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:18 PM

...............crickets.......................

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:26 PM

72 - yes, i sucked your cock...while your girlfriend licked my balls.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:46 PM

78. ?????

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 10:03 PM

Second #7 -- LAYOFF NEWS!!

Elie, Lat did some actual researching/reporting on occasion. It can't be that hard. Try it.

And monitor the damn comments and delete some please.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 10:19 PM

Mayer just laid off Brown. Also Skadden de-equitized Arps.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 10:41 PM

36: It gets f***ed by Reggie Bush.

hth

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:18 PM

what is up with all of the Skadden DC rumors? I believe there is more out there than is being reported on ATL!!! Please provide more light to what is going on at the various firms!!!!!!!

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 12:02 AM

should someone with another offer at a V50 Chicago firm rethink accepting at Jenner? I loved the callback and the people, but the layoff issues are making me nervous.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 12:30 AM

84: if your other offer is from Kirkland, yes. if it's from Skadden, kill yourself now.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 1:33 AM

I'm also interested in all of the rumors about Skadden DC.

Not that I care about that office, but I love me some skaddenfreude.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 7:29 AM

Morning quiz. Which firm falls into the following behavior pattern? The shell game is so fascinating and so predictable. Yes, your per partner profits may go up - but only because you've slashed the numerator in the equation. If you fire, de equitize, or otherwise dispose of 15% of your equity partners and at the same time overall profits fall only 8% then per partner profits actually incrase. But even the remaining souls will have to kick in a huge chunk of road apples to re build capital next year. So if your per partner profits go up 10% but you have to take 10% of your after tax net and augment capital - you lose. At best you see that capital when you die, withdraw, retire, etc. Non interest bearing and not guaranteed. Nero fiddles. Rome burns. And only the leaders get to wear asbestos.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 7:58 AM

87, maybe you should take the day off...

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:22 AM

84- I would say that it depends on the firm. Some firms in Chicago would definitely be worth another look given the layoffs at Jenner.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:44 AM

70 -- i could never get w&c (williams & connolly, not white & case obviously)! i was just using them as an example of a well-managed firm that seems to have resisted the temptation to over hire and do stupid stuff. i'm sure there are other such firms but they seem to stand out.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:52 AM

84 here -- looking between jenner, baker, or a few mid size firms that seem very financially stable at the moment (mostly due to what seems to be conservative financial practices).

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:03 AM

87 - I think you mean "denominator."

On a separate note, I haven't visited this site in a few weeks, and based on the quality of the posts and the comments, I won't be back for several more.

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:11 AM

The truth is that Jenner fired far more than 10 partners over the last few weeks. All the firm cares about is controlling negative publicity while internal morale is at an all time low. Even partners who were not fired are fixing to leave because they feel they will be fired next and/or because they are pissed their friends were fired. Sinking ship.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:58 AM

To 93: Morale is fine.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:11 AM

Avoid Jenner -- it's a sinking ship. Outside of Chicago nobody cares about Jenner.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:18 AM

The Dechert View on "layoffs":

"In my view, layoffs are when you decide to cut headcount. It's not when you decide to replace people with better people." -- Bart Winokur

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:36 AM

J&B is an extreme liberal puke hole. They will survive however.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:36 AM

J&B is an extreme liberal puke hole. They will survive however.

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:46 AM

The situation at Jenner must be bad. I heard that Jenner is thinking of merging with Thelen.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:57 AM

QUESTION: WHICH CHICAGO LAW FIRM HAS THE MOST BANGABLE SECRETARIES?

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:59 AM

QUESTION: WHICH CHICAGO LAW FIRM HAS THE MOST BANGABLE SECRETARIES?

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:09 AM

94:

That's BS. I used to work there and still have friends there. According to them, morale is not fine. Quite the opposite. And my new firm has been getting a TON of resumes from Jennerites. Not a sign of high morale.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:11 AM

Mayer Brown in New York has been shedding associates (and partners) at a record number this year. I honestly don't know why I wasn't cut yet, but I'm sure my number will be up come end of the year. I honestly can't believe how many people have just disappeared in these past few months. I'm not even interested in believing whether it was voluntary or not, since everybody is gone and these halls seem more like a morgue than an international law firm.

104 Posted by Guy Incognito | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:23 AM

102: As you say.

Post Your Comment