Add RSS RSS

Musical Chairs: Gilbert Randolph To Add Jerry Oshinsky
Dickstein Shapiro, ‘Morin & Oshinsky’ To Change Stationery

gilbert randolph soon to be old logo.JPGGilbert Randolph has added Jerry Oshinsky to their partnership ranks. The firm will change its name to “Gilbert Oshinsky” to highlight this new acquisition. Firm chairman Scott Gilbert announced the new hire via a firm-wide email:

I have a number of exciting announcements.

First, I am extraordinarily pleased to tell you that Jerry Oshinsky will be joining the firm, likely as early as next week. A number of us were Jerry’s colleagues at Dickstein Shapiro, Morin & Oshinsky; indeed, it was the prospect of combining our respective practices that ultimately led me to leave Covington & Burling after 18 years and join Dickstein in the first place. Jerry is simply THE preeminent litigator and advisor in insurance law, and we certainly now can say that there rarely has been a coverage decision or settlement of any significance in the United States that did not directly involve Jerry or other of our firm lawyers. Of course, as anyone who knows Jerry can readily attest, he also is a tremendous human being, in every sense of the word. As his friend of 30 years and an ardent admirer, I just could not be more pleased and excited that Jerry has chosen to begin this new, and yet to be the most satisfying and successful, chapter of his storied career with us.

Second, as soon as Jerry is able to join the partnership, the firm will be changing its name to Gilbert Oshinsky LLP. This name best reflects our new, or in some cases reestablished, relationship with Jerry, as well as the merger of our two substantial practices. And yes, on several levels, we henceforth will be known as the GO to firm.

“GO to firm.” Nice touch.

The email went on to say that GO would be opening a Los Angeles office and that Oshinsky would be operating out of that new facility.

But the email does not mention Jerry C. Randolph, co-founder of the firm. Is there a limitation on the number of “Jerrys” allowed as name partners? Does he sleep with the fishes? Were they so excited about the “GO to” stuff that Randolph’s name became a marketing causality?

Dickstein Shapiro responds (sort of) after the jump.

Dickstein Shaprio still basically relevant logo.JPGDickstein Shapiro has not yet announced that one of their partners is leaving. Michelle Rodgers, a Dickstein Shapiro spokesperson, declined to comment on Gilbert’s email.

However one tipster did tell us:

I have heard a rumor from a source I consider reliable that Dickstein is getting ready to lay off 30 associates. My source did not know if it was firm-wide or office-specific

We thought that the two stories could be connected. But Rodgers unequivocally denied that there were any layoffs in the works at Dickstein. She also said that if Oshinsky were to leave, there would be no layoffs. And she then further assured us that no layoffs have been planned or discussed at Dickstein Shapiro at any level for any reason.

You can’t put it any more plainly than that.

So while Oshinsky represents a major hire for Gilbert Randolph Oshinsky, Dickstein doesn’t appear to be worried. Maybe Dickstein can poach the undervalued Jerry Randolph off of waivers.

Update: One tipster has more bad news for Dickstein:

Oshinsky is bringing a good portion of his policyholder insurance work with him. The rumor is that 100% of the clients that he’s asked to come have agreed. He’s not taking any other attorneys from Dickstein with him, but Gilbert Randolph (Gilbert Oshinsky) will be opening an LA office that may hire up to 12 attorneys to handle the incoming work. This includes 2 cases in active litigation, including the Duke University litigation where Duke is suing its insurers to recover settlements from the lying stripper/non-rape case from awhile back.

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:44 PM

Wokka Wokka!!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:45 PM

afsdfsdaafsdfasd

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:47 PM

Wokka Wokka!!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:48 PM

Really? They're dropping his name-- is the Randolph dude still alive? Even if he's dead, that's kinda cold.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:49 PM

First to say "Shaprio?"

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:49 PM

Fifth loser.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 1:51 PM

It's Stationery (with an "e"), not Stationary!!

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:00 PM

7=33 and never been kissed.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:06 PM


Newsflash - "Dickstein, Shapiro, Morin & Oshinsky" dropped "Oshinsky" (and "Morin") from its name more than two years ago, so it would surprise me that that firm would want to announce that a "name partner" was leaving when one isn't!

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:17 PM

Dickstein seems to be bleeding all its talent lately... it's entire securities practice left, its primary rainmakers in antitrust litigation left, and associates seem to be dropping off like flies... not sure what's going on over there.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:21 PM

DicksTTTein

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:21 PM

Laying off 30 associates? Wow, that's a meltdown.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:25 PM

No layoffs, just firings.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:30 PM

Right 13. That's the sell. 30 formerly fine associates just became dirtbags.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:49 PM

So this Oshinsky guy is taking enough work for a dozen associates but not bringing anyone with him? So that is 12 extra heads for the Dickstein, Shapiro, Morin, & Oshinsky folks to carry.

I wonder where the other 18 layoffs are going to come from.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 2:54 PM

forsooth

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 4:08 PM

DickShap = TTT

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 4:12 PM

this is a coup for gr.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 4:38 PM

Seems pretty dick not to bring any associates. I guess it's possible he asked and they declined, but it doesn't feel that way.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 7:11 PM

Not sure what's worse, Oshinsky leaving, or that the ATL crowd only sees the info worthy of 20 comments thusfar.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:18 PM

Was Oshinsky even working at the firm recently? He's not on their website - http://www.dicksteinshapiro.com/people/List.aspx?LastName=O - but Dickstein, Shapiro, and Morin are.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 10, 2008 11:21 PM

21 - he was there this morning, they have already changed it.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 5:17 AM

They also sent a memo labeled "Right Sizing" asking for volunteers.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 8:50 AM

21- its not about if he was present in the office (a lot of senior partners aren't). its about the business and profits he's taking with him. its really a shame, there was a reason dickstein was voted one of the best places to work in DC. guess nice guys finish last.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 10:21 AM

21 - Yes. His bio was still up as of yesterday afternoon. They must have pulled it soon after.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 10:57 AM

What effect do you think this has on the New York office?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 11, 2008 2:17 PM

sounds like yet another "town hall meeting" or "associate pep rally" is in order

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 12, 2008 12:59 AM

"What effect do you think this has on the New York office?"

Considering how much work came from Oshinsky (at least in the insurance world), there will be an effect.

I'm curious as to the claim that Jerry is leaving and not bringing other attorneys with him, sounds odd. I'm not that convinced of any of these rumors.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 12, 2008 5:20 PM

don't partnership agreements preclude partners from poaching attorneys while the partner is still in the office? i would be willing to bet attorneys leave to go to gr, but after a few weeks.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 12, 2008 8:37 PM

30 associates get fired and nobody seems to care. Must be a real statement of the times.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 12, 2008 9:39 PM

30- nobody cares because it's not true.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 12, 2008 10:06 PM

Where can someone go to verify this information?

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 12, 2008 10:36 PM

Venable is going to pick up many of the associates and form a new distressed equity group to rival C&B.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 12, 2008 11:02 PM

It is true. Count the IP associates for the next few weeks in NY.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 13, 2008 8:09 AM

Look at the last paragraph of: http://www.law.com/jsp/law/careercenter/lawArticleCareerCenter.jsp?id=1202425198785

"Michael Nannes, chairman of Dickstein Shapiro, says he plans to hold associate hiring steady, but says now is a good time to look for opportunities to bring on partners. "There are people who are excellent attorneys who are at firms that aren't doing that well who are concerned about the direction their firms are going." He says Dickstein could gain from some of that fallout."

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 13, 2008 8:57 AM

I wonder if Nannes considers Oshinsky "an excellent attorney at a firm that wasn't doing that well"?

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 13, 2008 11:58 AM

I'm betting Nannes is just trolling for partners to bring in business

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 13, 2008 11:58 AM

I'm betting Nannes is just trolling for partners to bring in business

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 13, 2008 12:19 PM

"Michael Nannes, chairman of Dickstein Shapiro, [a]sked if he anticipates declining head counts across District firms in the coming months, Nannes sums it up in a word: 'Absolutely.'"

http://www.law.com/jsp/law/careercenter/lawArticleCareerCenter.jsp?id=1202425198785

His way to say heads will roll?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 13, 2008 1:37 PM

39- I'm not sure about that. Profits will be down, for sure, as will contract atty positions. I can also see firms that have close NY ties (like Dickstein) going downhill.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 13, 2008 2:35 PM

DC's a tough market...less than 1500 biglaw jobs to go around...

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 14, 2008 1:26 PM

The only part of the securities group that left was a group of partners from the DC office which left behind significant pieces of work.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 14, 2008 3:11 PM

I know for a fact that Dickstein has already laid off several associates over the last month. Maybe it's the next Heller?

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:02 PM

Dickstein is not a great place to work. There is huge pressure on associates to give the firm positive rankings in reviews. It's like the USSR was, solid from afar, but rotten on the inside.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:28 PM

Do any of you who are making negative postings about the firm have real inside knowledge or are you just commenting idly?

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:29 PM

Do any of you who are making negative postings about the firm have real inside knowledge or are you just commenting idly?

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:03 AM

I worked there. I can confirm 44. Talk to any vets, and they'll say the same. There are pockets of contentment, and some really good people there, including a few partners, but by and large, one of the most miserable organizations I've ever seen.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:15 AM

Correction to 42. The entire DC securities section left. Every last one of them. DSMO now has no DC securities presence whatsoever.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:20 AM

47 - Did you work in the NYC, DC, or LA office?

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:20 AM

49 -- DC

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:22 AM

Out of curiosity, how come the Clifford Chance layoffs made huge headlines (AmLaw, Law.com), but the Dickstein layoffs/departures haven't been reported anywhere?

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:24 AM

2 reasons, I think. DS has an excellent PR machine, including insiders at Legal Times and AmLaw. Second, it just may not be true.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:44 AM

50 - Do you know about any layoffs or departures at the New York office?

52 - How do you verify if it is true?

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:05 AM

53 -- Nope.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:13 AM

53- see 34 above!

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:40 PM

I can confirm that associates from all groups have been axed, over 20 staff have been given pink slips our in this case Fed Ex envelopes, the entire Securities group has departed for greener pastures, the Anti-trust top has left, and word on the street is that more layoffs are in the horizon

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:00 PM

Get out!

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:03 PM

56 - are you referring to DC or NY offices, or both? Also, the number of associates/partners on the website hasn't changed...are you sure about this?

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:23 PM

Let's get names of some of these associates so we can laugh at them.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 8:49 PM

I heard that Dickstein brought on 25 new associates without any work? Any word on this?

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:14 AM

I heard Dickstein is falling apart. It will be next.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:27 PM

DS website still touts accomplishments of old securities group -- that left months ago. Isn't that misleading the potential client? The client would not be getting the experience touted -- it all left.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:45 PM

Updates on any of this?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 15, 2008 11:40 AM

(1) Like any institution/firm/company, there are people coming and going. But there is no truth to the "layoffs."
(2) It is clear from my experience that the new associate hires are all busy.
(3) The numbers actually suggest that DS is doing very well compared to most firms in today's economy.

DS is a great firm. That is the reason I came and will continue to stay.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 4:46 PM

Unfortunately, the rumors are true.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 2, 2008 4:06 AM

The layoffs are true. Attorneys, secretaries, floaters and others staff members started being let go in early August. The floater secretaries were all called into a meeting and told that it was their last day. Everyone was on pins and needles. Several staff employees questioned the release of the floater secretaries and were told that there was no need for panic because there were no more foreseeable layoffs.
Boy did that turn out to be a lie...
23, you are correct, that "Right Sizing" memo was delivered to the secretaries on September 5, 2008 to all secretaries asking for 10 volunteers to quit because they were overstaffed. So 10 secretaries were let go on October 3, 2008 (some volunteers so forced out). It has been complete chaos for the secretaries since the so-called "right-sizing" took place. Some secretaries are now supporting 4, 5,and 6 attorneys as a result. Some attorneys were given word that they were being let go, also. I think they are just about gone by now. So YES, there is trouble in the camp! I worked there as a senior paralegal and was glad I got the hell out when I did. Dickstein should be labeled as one of the "HARDEST" places to work!

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, December 3, 2008 2:21 PM

Any word on the fallout from Jerry Oshinsky leaving and from Dickstein's entire Securities/White Collar group from Washington, DC jumping ship? Did Oshinsky take any attorneys with him? How many attorneys have been laid off?

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, December 6, 2008 2:40 AM

Oshinsky didn't take any attorneys with him.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 19, 2008 1:00 PM

I was one of the first "floater" secretaries to go. Came back from vacation to find a Fed Ex envelope on my doorstep terminating me. I worked with Jerry Oshinsky for over 20 years. I know for sure that a number of associates were let go not long after I left and that the secretaries were asked to "volunteer" to leave. Not sure what's going on now.

Post Your Comment