Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Layoff Watch: The Sun Is Not Shining At Sonnenschein

Sonnenschein Nath Rosenthal Above the Law blog.jpgToday is not a good day to be Carlo Rizzi. We’re getting word that Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal is laying off a bunch of attorneys and staff today. The big number we are hearing is that 60 associates and staff are out of jobs.

According to one tipster, the layoffs are being carried out nationwide, with no input from local offices.

However you slice it, 60 is a huge number. Sonnenschein didn’t exactly deny these reports. A firm spokesperson told us:

We look at staffing levels around this time every year as part of our budget and practice planning processes, and it is not unusual for us to make adjustments. While we understand that rumors such as the one you are reporting about Sonnenschein and multiple other law firms are circulating, we have nothing to add at this time.

More on Sonnenchein’s layoffs after the jump.

We expect Sonnenschein to be cautious when it comes to press inquires about layoffs. You’ll remember that last time the firm took some heat for their non-existent severance packages.

According to a tipster, this year’s severance package will be similar to what happened before:

[Y]ou are still on the payroll until the end of the year but you are “required” to “work” (whatever that means, as they never really fleshed that out then or now). I suspect it is to mitigate their losses as people find other work and also to keep people in check while they are still getting paid.

Good luck to everybody out there suffering from a dreaded “October Surprise.” Spend some time with the family, take a mini-vacation, and then get right back on the horse. Layoffs are the definition of a “it’s not you, it’s me” break-up.

Update: The firm has confirmed that there were layoffs. More details here.

Earlier: Nationwide Layoff Watch: No Severance at Sonnenschein? Elliott Portnoy to WSJ: It’s all about the benjamins, baby.

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:43 PM

yikes

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:43 PM

Long time reader, first time FIRSTER!

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:44 PM

FIRSTTT

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:44 PM

These are very scary times.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:44 PM

Which offices? Any news on their CharloTTTe office?

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:45 PM

THIS IS GETTING ILLMATIC

- Senor Illmatico

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:45 PM

Long time reader, first time FIRSTER!

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:45 PM

We need an ATL Platinium were we only talk about real law schools and law firms.

When has anyone at Case Western or Sonnsh!tty ever done anything important?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:46 PM

what the hell is going on today? shudder.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:48 PM

You think everyone was waiting for the first firm to do it and now that Clifford Chance has done it its just the beginning of a huge wave of cuts?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:50 PM

9, well two weeks notice till the end of the month puts you pretty squarely at today...

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:50 PM

Hey Hofstra, how you doing? Say hi to your mom for me, ok.

Sonnenshein up yo ass.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:51 PM

8 - as cool as nervous T10 1L.

(still though, you have a point)

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:51 PM

10 - absolutely. The strong will separate from the weak over the coming weeks.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:52 PM

"Layoffs are the definition of a "It's not you, it's me" break-up. "

What do you mean? It is totally you. There is a reason they lay off some people and not others.

SPOILER ALERT:

It's because the people who get laid of are bottom of the barrel.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:52 PM

OOH, WHO ELSE WILL BE AXING?

ANYONE FROM V50?

DO TELL.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:54 PM

15: True. Many of them may be careless and may make careless errors such as dropping one of the "f"s in "off."

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:55 PM

laid of? I don't get it, please explain.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:56 PM

NY TO 190!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (I started drinking when the CC layoff news hit).

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:00 PM

Suck it T10 1L. We all know you are Mystall's fat little brother.

suck it.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:04 PM

twenty-FIRST

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:05 PM

Anyone else get a really sexist vibe from Cravath? Spent the entire day interviewing there, and the only woman I met was the floozy who guided me around the office, shaking her ass the whole time like some kind of stripper. Probably going to turn them down and take the Wachtell instead.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:05 PM

There is a reason they lay off some people and not others.

__________________________________________

Because they need lay off some people, but not others?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:06 PM

Siren?

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:06 PM

I wonder if all the layoffs are because the summer is over and summer associates have solidified their position. So the summer associates who accepted are not going to run off somewhere at hearing bad news. OCI is over so if they even throught about looking elsewhere, they are SOL.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:06 PM

More than 700 points down in the DOW, the magic 8-ball says that a lot more associates are going to lose their jobs and the partners will find themselves with a one bedroom in Wildwood, New Jersey, instead of a mansion right on the beach in the Hamptons.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:07 PM

I wonder if all the layoffs are because the summer is over and summer associates have solidified their position. So the summer associates who accepted are not going to run off somewhere at hearing bad news. OCI is over so if they even throught about looking elsewhere, they are SOL.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:07 PM

I wonder if all the layoffs are because the summer is over and summer associates have solidified their position. So the summer associates who accepted are not going to run off somewhere at hearing bad news. OCI is over so if they even throught about looking elsewhere, they are SOL.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:11 PM

22 -- did you get her name? Sounds cool.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:11 PM

What a great time to concurrently raise taxes on husbands and wifes jointly earning $250,ooo and above and to give $1 trillion a year to those households who currently pay no income tax in the form of tax credits!

Go Obama-Biden! Go socialism!

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:11 PM

22 -- did you get her name? Sounds cool.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:12 PM

What a great time to concurrently raise taxes on husbands and wifes jointly earning $250,ooo and above and to give $1 trillion a year to those households who currently pay no income tax in the form of tax credits!

Go Obama-Biden! Go socialism!

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:12 PM

Yes Chicken Little the sky is falling!

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:14 PM

yikes

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:14 PM

I would assume that the layoffs won't really start in earnest until after the 2009 summer recruiting is complete...

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:14 PM

30 would have voted for Hoover in 1932.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:16 PM

The stock market is down something like 40 percent this past year, one in three houses in some communities are in foreclosure, consumer spending is down, credit is unattainable for anyone except those who don't need it, and Willie Sutton's famous comment that he robbed banks because "that's where the money was" isn't true any more. Even the banks are broke.

And you fools are twittering about associate jobs?

In a year or less, many of you won't even have the luxury of complaining. You'll be happy to have jobs, period.

~In House Counsel

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:17 PM

The news today just grows more and more grim by the moment. I truly want to hide under my desk.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:18 PM

It seems like it would be extremely easy to have the website auto-delete duplicate comments. Lat? Mystal? Can we get this done?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:19 PM

If you are so worried about losing your jobs, be proactive. Go to the partners in your law firm and offer to take a pay cut in exchange for not being laid off.

Believe me, layoffs are coming and it is every man for himself. Those who think, do, and those who don't, post anonymously on Internet message boards.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:21 PM

30,

We can thank our fearless President for those inspiring words below.

“These are extraordinary measures, no question about it,” President Bush said. “But they’re well thought out, they are necessary, and I’m confident in the long run this economy will come back."

Heckuva job, Bushie!

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:24 PM

A lot of people are suffering from a so-called "October surprise."

My reaction given the retail downturn that sparked the 700 Dow plunge?

Pain. I see pain.

Seventy-two percent of our economy is based on spending??

Pain. I see pain.

Pain for you, for me, and for everyone.

Next?

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:29 PM

Trig Palin was behind these latest cuts. Mark my words.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:32 PM

Seven, seven hundred, seven hundred point drooooooooooooooop!

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:32 PM

41, Do you think that in the long run the economy will not come back?

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:33 PM

Note: please, only serious replies.

I am a 3L with an offer from a V-30. I know things are slow at my firm, and am seriously becoming concerned that the firm will revoke my offer. How much of a real possibility is this? Things are very, very bad I know. But how much worse do things need to get before they start revoking offers?

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:34 PM

46 - start applying for scuba instructor positions in Florida before the inundation of applications begins.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:35 PM

45,

The economy will come back. The only question is whether it is 10 years or 20 years or more.

It all depends on the quality of the leadership -- of which there is none right now.

Next question, dumbass?

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:35 PM

Cutting associate pay won't work. Law firms see this as an opportunity to cut the fat (if they get some meat in there, so be it). Firms would much rather have everyone busy at full pay than people working half the time at half pay.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:35 PM

39 - it would probably be super easy. you should write a snippet of code for Lat.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:36 PM

45 - In the long run, we're all dead. -JMKeynes

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:37 PM

Scuba instructors in Florida are only taking associates from a top 10 school, above 3.5 GPA and with a minimum of 4 years of securities/M&A experience. Otherwise no dice.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:38 PM

48 = troll or angry moron.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:41 PM

52--who do the scuba instructors instruct? no one can afford scuba lessons!

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:42 PM

THANK YOU REPUBLICANS AND YOUR DE-REGULATION POLICIES. NOBODY WAS WATCHING WHILE MORTGAGE BROKERS, INVESTMENT BANKS AND CREDIT RATING AGENCIES COMBINED TO WRECK OUR ECONOMY.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:44 PM

THANK YOU DEMOCRATS FOR DEMANDING FREDDIE MAC AND FANNIE MAY MAKE LOANS TO PEOPLE WHO COULD NEVER IMAGINE REPAYING THEM, COMBINING TO WRECK OUR ECONOMY

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:44 PM

46 - call and ask. Or talk to associates you clicked with during the recruiting process. You have an offer, they're not going to revoke it for you asking. They may lie, but you never know...they may say something insightful like - if you have other opportunities, it may be wise to pursue them.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:44 PM

55-Don't forget the attorneys who gave their blessings to the package.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:45 PM

56 - pathetic response.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:45 PM

Chicago firms are hurting. Both Sonnenschein and Katten will be faced with dissolution.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:46 PM

Partner G.G.:

Well, I appreciate the opportunity you're giving me Mr./Ms. Associate as the single largest Partner in TTT Law, to speak. Well, ladies and gentlemen we're not here to indulge in fantasy but in political and economic reality. America, America has become a second-rate power. Its trade deficit and its fiscal deficit are at nightmare proportions. Now, in the days of the free market when our country was a top industrial power, there was accountability to the Partner. The Cravaths, the Bartletts, the Skaddens, the men that built this great legal empire, made sure of it because it was their money at stake. Today, associates have no stake in the firm! All together, these men sitting up here own less than three percent of the firm. And where does Mr./Ms. Associate put his 160k salary? Not in firm partnership interests; he owns nothing. The Partners own the firm.

That's right, you, the Partner. And you are all being royally screwed over by these, these associates, with their luncheons, their golfing and fishing trips, their black cars and free dinners.

TTT Law has 333 different associates each earning almost 200 thousand dollars a year. Now, I have spent the last two months analyzing what all these guys do, and I still can't figure it out. One thing I do know is that firm lost [*] dollars last year, and I'll bet that half of that was spent in all the paperwork going back and forth between all these associates. The new law of evolution in legal America seems to be survival of the unfittest. Well, in my book you either do it right or you get eliminated. In the last seven firms that I've been involved with, there were 25 partners who have made a pretax profit of 2.5 million dollars.

Thank you. I am not a destroyer of firms. I am a liberator of them! The point is, ladies and gentleman, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save TTT Law, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA. Thank you very much.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:47 PM

Why are Chicago firms hurting any more than firms in other cities?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:50 PM

62

All the talent has gone into the Obama campaign and the dregs are left behind?

Just a guess.

BTW, 61 is pretty funny as hell.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:51 PM

What firms are safe bets in Chicago? This is a key factor for me in deciding where to summer.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:55 PM

We now need a TTT firm.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:58 PM

I can't believe this is happening, AGAIN, at SNR. Rumor has it their CFO is leaving (prior to second round layoff announcement.) That should sum it up for anyone who is wondering if they will make it or not.

To all the folks still there: the writing is on the wall - initiate your own search - stay ahead of the powercurve.

The firm changed and it will never be same since Duane Quaini, former Chairman, stepped down and some egotistical, inexperienced, wet behind the ears boy took over. I mourn the loss of what once was a firm who valued its employees and clients dignity and respect. It truly is all about the benjamins now.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:04 PM

Any layoffs at Sonnenschein KC? Thanks.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:11 PM

67,

If you are seriously considering KC, you will not succeed in life.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:14 PM

I think these layoffs are just the beginning. 4th quarter earnings will be dismal come January, more bankruptcies will hit (and not just financial firms) and the wide-spread effects of the credit-crisis will have manifested itself in the overall economy.

It seems like the market right now is reacting out of fear of the unknown. But in a few months, the market will react to concrete earnings covering the period we are in now, and it won't be pretty.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:15 PM

Cravath is full of homos. Skadden much better to work for.

balls deep

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:16 PM

64: any of the big boys--Sidley, Kirkland, Skadden--will be just fine in Chicago.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:16 PM

L&W are laying people off.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:17 PM

Will the gov't bailout my student loans now, please?
~ChixLittle

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:18 PM

Also layoffs at Jones Day

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:18 PM

8, I'm sure you'd eventually get bored with a blog filled purely with comments calling UPenn "Penn State" and "GULCing" people all day.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:20 PM

What's going on at Jones Day? How many gone?

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:20 PM

69 is dead on. By the time this is over, the vast majority of the V-100 will have cut their associate numbers IN HALF.

Mark this post. 2009 will be a year everyone remembers for the rest of their lives.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:21 PM

There is nothing little about Mystttal's chicken.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:22 PM

64- The bigger firms will do better. Try to stay V50.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:23 PM

L&W - Jones Day? Details please, or are you making this up?

69 is absolutely right. I wonder if, 3 years from now, a potential hiring partner would fault me for having simply dropped out of my current gig and taken 3 years to experience some personal growth through being a ski bum, scuba instructor, etc. I mean, by then, the market should be back and I could find a job, right? Why toil in fear until then, pretending to be busy?

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:23 PM

But what about Jones Day and L&W? How many have been laid off?

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:27 PM

This economy will have (hopefully) a sobering effect on some of the entitled jacka$$es that post here.

We'll see who is laughing when a lawyer from a TTT school is working and some of the holier than thou are out on their a$$es.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:30 PM

82- do you practice being a conceited little prick or does it come naturally?

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:33 PM

Which types of firms will fare the best in the current economic situation? Are firms which focus on any particular area safer than others? Are firms which are not heavily dependent on finance or transactional work better bets, or are there serious problems across the board?

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:35 PM

84 -- Every large law firm will have to do mass layoffs to survive. It's as simple as that.

I expect the middle of the road firms -- Milbank, Sidley, W&C -- to be next.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:40 PM

layoffs at Fried Frank-30 to 40 tomorrow.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:40 PM

The issue is broader than practice area. Several V100 firms are relying on debt to cover payroll because they are not good at collections (it's "unseemly"), their clients just don't have it/don't want to pay it now, or that's just how they've been operating to pay their rainmakers millions and the 160k starting salaries, but with credit drying up that's a problem for those firms...several V100 firms also rely heavily on a handful of clients or financial institutions that are a large percentage of their work and the firm isn't diversified enough.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:42 PM

Are layoffs to date generally across all classes, or are firms trimming the fat more heavily at the less profitable levels (1st-3rd years), while maintaining greater numbers at the more profitable mid-level?

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:46 PM

Pillsbury has laid people off.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:46 PM

looks like I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:46 PM

partner layoffs will be next

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:49 PM

35 partner layoffs at kramer levin

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:49 PM

35 partner layoffs at kramer levin

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:51 PM

how will "boutiques" like williams & connolly make out?

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:54 PM

35 partners at KL? Are you sure?

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:54 PM

how will "boutiques" like wachtell be affected?

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:56 PM

22 - please remove the penis from your mouth and grow a pair. if your'e a chick, well, based on your comments, you must be fugly. TFB.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:58 PM

how will "boutiques" like boies schiller be affected?

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:59 PM

vote obama to change this bullshit situation where 60 TRILLION in unregulated CDS tanked our economy thanks to Bush/McCain/Gramm

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:59 PM

layoffs in the mail room at seyfarth shaw.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:01 PM

I know CC dropped lit people yesterday, but generally speaking, is it the corporate, real estate, and finance type groups that are having the most issues and most prone to lay offs?

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:03 PM

61...not impressed.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:03 PM

wachtell will lay off marty lipton tomorrow!

you heard it here first!

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:05 PM

101 - whatever group you want to be in will be the one most prone to layoffs, fucktard.

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:06 PM

No layoffs at Jones Day. They do not lay people off for macroeconomic reasons.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:06 PM

No layoffs at Jones Day. They do not lay people off for macroeconomic reasons.

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:08 PM

98, 96 and 94 -- Those firms will be just fine. They're a cut above everyone else in terms of high-profile litigation.

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:10 PM

how will "boutiques" like the law offices of marc edelman be affected?

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:11 PM

97 - look like you want some...

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:11 PM

Rumor that Howrey is planning on stealth layoffs by the beginning of next year....anyone else heard this? Word is that it is extremely slow across all practice groups.

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:15 PM

rumor has it that that there will be unsubstantiated rumors about layoffs on this board.

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:15 PM

Me thinks there has been a lot of BS on thsi board today about which firms are laying off. All that in one day would be an unprecedented shitstorm, the likes of which we have not seen since the Dow was at 8500. Oh, wait.

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:17 PM

me thinks that people who say "me thinks" are fucking tools of the highest order.

may god have mercy on your stupid fucking soul.

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:18 PM

I was just layed off at thatcher-yay!

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:20 PM

So, let's hear some predictions about which of the V100 firms are in the shitter and which ones will be ok- someone go down the whole list.

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:22 PM

113 - sarcastic or not, you're a hypocrite.

And re: the existence of god, see subsequent blog posting.

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:24 PM

How will "boutiques" such as the law offices of Larry H. Parker be affected?

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:28 PM

layoffs at Weil Gotshal... 73 associates, 2 legal secretaries in the next week

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:33 PM

"Rumor that Howrey is planning on stealth layoffs by the beginning of next year....anyone else heard this? Word is that it is extremely slow across all practice groups."

Howrey associate here. Firm is up from last year and last year was up 10-15%. IP and anti-trust practice is strong but global lit is slow. I do not foresee layoffs, stealth or otherwise unless truly performance based.

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:36 PM

I heard WILDMAN HARROLD is hiring 178 associates tomorrow.

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:42 PM

115 - you're gonna be next for the chop, you tool.

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:43 PM

Has anyone substantiated the layoff rumors for Alston and Bird?

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:45 PM

Better to be a first year associate than a second year associate right about now.

avatar
124 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:45 PM

118 is an idiot

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:46 PM

the legal secretaries at weil are the retardedest

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:48 PM

I'm willing to bet Mayer Brown will be laying off next

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:48 PM

A&B - there are more lay offs coming

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:49 PM

121- I can't be fired, I'm just a nervous T10 1L. I just want to know where NOT to interview

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:49 PM

MOFO CUTTING ITS LEGAL RECRUITING DEPT. IN HALF!!!!!!

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:51 PM

129 -- What about its illegal recruiting department?

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:52 PM

115- heres your list as taken from above the law. someone else can feel free to use it to comment

1. Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (8.777)
2. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP (8.732)
3. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP (8.257)
4. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (8.135)
5. Davis Polk & Wardwell (8.070)
6. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP (7.985)
7. Latham & Watkins LLP (7.784)
8. Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton LLP (7.754)
9. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP (7.623)
10. Kirkland & Ellis LLP (7.473)
11. Covington & Burling LLP (7.428)
12. Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (7.417)
13. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (7.290)
14. Williams & Connolly LLP (7.238)
15. Sidley Austin LLP (7.201)
16. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP (7.056)
17. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (7.055)
18. White & Case LLP (7.054)
19. Shearman & Sterling LLP (7.043)
20. Arnold & Porter LLP (6.905)
21. O'Melveny & Myers LLP (6.815)
22. Clifford Chance LLP (6.772)
23. Jones Day (6.763)
24. Morrison & Foerster LLP (6.657)
25. Hogan & Hartson LLP (6.579)
26. Linklaters (6.574)
27. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy (6.512)
28. Ropes & Gray LLP (6.501)
29. Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP (6.494)
30. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker (6.481)
31. Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP (6.461)
32. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP (6.327)
33. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP (6.313)
34. Winston & Strawn LLP (6.275)
35. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP (6.235)
36. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP (6.174)
37. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (6.173)
38. Allen & Overy LLP (6.147)
39. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft (6.131)
40. Proskauer Rose LLP (6.102)
41. Baker Botts LLP (6.096)
42. King & Spalding LLP (6.066)
43. DLA Piper (6.039)
44. Baker & McKenzie (5.982)
45. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (5.976)
46. Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP (5.974)
47. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (5.941)
48. Dewey & LeBoeuf (5.924)
49. Fulbright & Jaworski LLP (5.906)
50. McDermott, Will & Emery (5.892)
51. Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP (5.851)
52. Dechert LLP (5.838)
53. Vinson & Elkins LLP (5.822)
54. Goodwin Procter LLP (5.815)
55. Jenner & Block LLP (5.778)
56. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP (5.728)
57. Alston & Bird LLP (5.715)
58. Fish & Richardson P.C. (5.706)
59. Cooley Godward LLP (5.692)
60. Irell & Manella LLP (5.635)
61. Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP (5.608)
62. Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP (5.583)
63. Bingham McCutchen LLP (5.583)
64. Greenberg Traurig, LLP (5.478)
65. Holland & Knight LLP (5.416)
66. Heller Ehrman LLP (5.346)
67. Foley & Lardner LLP (5.266)
68. Steptoe & Johnson LLP (5.252)
69. K&L Gates LLP (5.242)
70. Kaye Scholer LLP (5.230)
71. Nixon Peabody LLP (5.218)
72. Hunton & Williams LLP (5.208)
73. Perkins Coie LLP (5.119)
74. Reed Smith LLP (5.057)
75. Patton Boggs LLP (5.050)
76. Chadbourne & Parke LLP (4.997)
77. Bryan Cave LLP (4.969)
78. Thacher Proffitt & Wood LLP (4.967)
79. Howrey LLP (4.926)
80. Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP (4.910)
81. Crowell & Moring LLP (4.763)
82. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP (4.754)
83. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP (4.735)
84. Arent Fox PLLC (4.726)
85. McGuireWoods LLP (4.697)
86. Venable LLP (4.676)
87. Dorsey & Whitney LLP (4.575)
88. Dickstein Shapiro LLP (4.554)
89. Baker & Hostetler (4.531)
90. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P (4.503)
91. Lovells (4.494)
92. Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP (4.489)
93. Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP (4.478)
94. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP (4.459)
95. Kilpatrick Stockton LLP (4.452)
96. Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP (4.439)
97. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey LLP (4.421)
98. Seyfarth Shaw (4.399)
99. Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo PC (4.394)
100. Fenwick & West LLP (4.373)

avatar
132 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:57 PM

I can't imagine any firm in the V17 or better laying anyone off.

avatar
133 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:58 PM

I just left my V60 firm and started by own shop. How will I be affected? If clients have a choice b/w me and a major firm, will they pick me if I charge less?

avatar
134 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:00 PM

http://fordhamnotes.blogspot.com/2008/10/top-firms-turn-to-fordham-law-for-new.html

Top Firms Turn to Fordham Law for New Associates

avatar
135 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:05 PM

Anyone know anything about the TTTexas firms?

avatar
136 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:06 PM

413 part time GULCers were gassed to death today apparently in an attempt at mercy killings by the school.

avatar
137 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:06 PM

132 - you are a naive little prick. of course v17 firms are going to be cutting. wake up little pecker..

avatar
138 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:07 PM

All this bad news is making me shit my pants - arrgghhhhh! That's better . . . .

avatar
139 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:08 PM

This is truly sad...

avatar
140 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:11 PM

132 - please dunk your head in a toilet and wake up.

avatar
141 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:12 PM

137 & 140 = non-V17 failures

avatar
142 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:15 PM

135- I'm also curious to know what the vibe is at the Texas-centric places (though I take issue with your use of TTT). How 'bout it? What's the word at Baker Botts, Fullbright, V&E?

avatar
143 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:16 PM

Whats dropped more in the past year - the Dow or Sonn's payroll?

avatar
144 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:17 PM

Cravath is sittin pretty .... line waiting around the corner to wipe everyones ass up here in the Death Star.

Sorry, Scatten Munchin and Hofstra.

Balls Deep PRIDE

avatar
145 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:24 PM

http://obamaisscum.blogspot.com/

avatar
146 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:24 PM

survival of the fittest. associates and firms.

avatar
147 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:33 PM

botts is looking shakey...

avatar
148 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:35 PM

gdc :(

avatar
149 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:35 PM

Sonnenschein apparently pulled out of my school's OCI. They were at an "employer symposium" event in April, and then when bidding for interviews came around, they were all of a sudden in the "resume collect" category. I more than met their hiring criteria, but never heard back. They must've seen this coming and scaled back recruiting.

avatar
150 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:43 PM

133: You should seriously start considering laying yourself off.

avatar
151 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:53 PM

Baker & McKenzie is doing just fine. A friend explained that their global reach and relatively few offices in N.America relative to the rest of the world have them, essentially, well diversified to withstand this current economic downturn. I'm trying to get an interview...

avatar
152 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:55 PM

69, agree with you that current layoffs are just the beginning. However, markets (and pretty much everyone else) already know NOW that 4Q earnings will be "dismal" - no need to wait for January - which is why markets are so schizo NOW. Do you understand that markets look to future earnings potential while Q statements merely document 3 months which already PASSED??? Thus, markets are reacting to "fear of the unknown" only in the sense that they don't know if recession will continue into 2010, not whether it will happen. Markets already know that 2009 is a wash from earnings standpoint; Q statements will merely note how well/badly companies are surviving the downturn.
[END INTRO TO MARKET ECONOMICS]

And 133, truly hope that your comment was in jest. Otherwise, I hope that you have a contingency plan.

avatar
153 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:56 PM

I guess that there will definitely not be any Sonnenschein merger with Foley & Lardner.

avatar
154 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:57 PM

WLRK only hires "special" people so they should be fine.

avatar
155 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 8:01 PM

151, not watching news lately, huh? Happen to hear little tidbit that while things are bad here, actually worse across the pond? Here about certain country called Iceland? While B&M probably can ride out this nightmare, global reach is not sufficient cushion. Just something to mull over.

avatar
156 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 8:20 PM

anything on jenner?

avatar
157 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 8:45 PM

Don't be fooled by the job that you got
You'll be laid off by Jenner and the Block

- J-Law

avatar
158 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:04 PM

157 - Props!

You cannot use Baker's gazillion offices as support that it is "diversified," and therefore, protected from the downturn. Baker's international offices do not pay U.S. market rates.

avatar
159 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:30 PM

Can we get a pay cut instead of a layoff????
Please??
I have student loans (undergrad and law school)

NY to 120!!!!!!!!!!!!!

avatar
160 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:35 PM

I second your comment 159. Firms should give choice of pay cut or pay freeze

avatar
161 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:55 PM

Elliott Portnoy should do the honorable thing and resign. He may be a rainmaker, but manager of the year he is not. I wouldn't hire him to manage my laundry. He is in the process of running that firm into the ground and smearing its reputation in the process. He is obviously in over his head. The moves he has made are straight from the altheimer playbook.

avatar
162 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:08 PM

Sonnenschein has no compassion for anyone, it's all about the benjamins. Experienced personnel are being let go to bring in the young blood at half the cost. Where did all the loyalty and ass kissing get anyone! Wake up, smell the coffee and get out while you still can.

avatar
163 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:17 PM


160 - Lawyers that are making their hours (and not seeing friends and family for months on end) might disagree with you.

Associates that get fired are (1) in practice areas that no longer justify the staffing levels of 2004-2007 (and will not justify such levels for a long time), or (2) not big-law caliber. In this era of first year lawyers making $160k and partners always looking across the street for more money, firms are not going to carry dead weight..

The vast majority firms are firing attorneys - either through mass layoffs or the stealth variety. Rainmakers are not going to take pay cuts to keep lawyers billing 1200 hours per year sitting at their desks.

avatar
164 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:45 PM

And now you know the rest of the story (of why OCI sucked this year).

The brutality has only just begun.

avatar
165 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 11:03 PM

Sonnenschein has gotten so top heavy, the scale has tipped over and at the price of your hard working dedicated Indians. Not to many Indians left . . . Chiefs you are next!

avatar
166 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 15, 2008 11:03 PM

Sonnenschein has gotten so top heavy, the scale has tipped over and at the price of your hard working dedicated Indians. Not to many Indians left . . . Chiefs you are next!

avatar
167 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:09 AM

152,
I understand the argument that markets fully price-in future earnings. But I am suggesting that even at current PE's, companies are overvalued. See http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/10/analysts-foreca.html

Moreover, when 4th quarter earnings come out, companies will have a better sense of the losses they face as a result of the credit crisis. That is when you will see more bankruptcies, layoffs and other restructurings, which will have a cascading effect on the economy.

PE ratios have further to fall, and that's why I think more pain is ahead in January.

-69


avatar
168 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:38 AM

Holy Shit! Weil fired 12 NY bankruptcy associates!

avatar
169 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:55 AM

rumor has it that Sidley NY will start laying off associates within the next 2 weeks. Probably non-litigation associates, but still.

86 -- Can we have more about the Fried Frank layoffs?

avatar
170 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 3:16 AM

Latham has been stealth firing for quite a while now. They toned it down a bit last month but they appear to be stepping it up.

I wish the very best of luck to the laid off associates.

avatar
171 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 7:08 AM

163 = fucktard

Its not about making hours anymore! Didn't you read the CC comment that said the lay off was random and affected ppl who were better than average.

NY to 120!!!!!

avatar
172 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:38 AM

I'm not sure what the number is, but I was effected. Nov 1 is the last day for staff let go, but of course attorneys get more time to clear up their docket. With the market the way it is I am merely praying that I will find something soon. Some said this would be a good time to spend with the family, yes, but it is also a time to re-evaluate our budget.

avatar
173 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:34 AM

About 45 Sonnenschein associates were booted. Some partners will no longer be getting full pay, but still must bill same hours. Even though they just opened a Zurich office, other offices may be closing.

But not to worry, in January the partners will still be partying at a resort in Vegas. Their retreat is still their priority.

avatar
174 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:54 AM

Are DLA Piper Chicago layoffs confirmed?

avatar
175 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:21 AM

The Sonnenschein layoffs affected "Approximately two dozen lawyers," according to Portnoy.

avatar
176 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:25 AM

127 - where are these A&B layoff rumors coming from?

avatar
177 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:33 AM

For all of those singing the praises of big firms and claiming that the biggest and best will not be laying off associates...you might as well admit that you are scared.

Meanwhile, at my small but strong litigation firm, business is increasing. We are hiring. I am having no trouble meeting and exceeding my hours.

avatar
178 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:46 AM

174 - nothing to confirm. Nice try.

avatar
179 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:16 PM

PPP=TTT

avatar
180 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:31 PM

WTF does TTT mean?

avatar
181 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:32 PM

Can someone list the names of SNR associates/staff/whoever that were laid off? And break it down by office, please.

avatar
182 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:36 PM

El-Idiot (sorry) meant Elliot needs to give up and go away and get one of the adults back in charge

avatar
183 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:37 PM

El-Idiot (sorry) meant Elliot needs to give up and go away and get one of the adults back in charge

avatar
184 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:37 PM

El-Idiot (sorry) meant Elliot needs to give up and go away and get one of the adults back in charge

avatar
185 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 2:20 PM

Saying it three times will make it come true!

avatar
186 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:01 PM

DAAAAAAAMN!!!11

avatar
187 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:01 PM

DAAAAAAAMN!!!11

avatar
188 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:04 PM

Creditor the Clown's firm is hiring. Google it.

avatar
189 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:59 PM

I just got laid off at Fried Frank-corporate dept.

avatar
190 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 16, 2008 7:18 PM

189- How many people did they let go?

avatar
191 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 17, 2008 5:20 PM

How is Charlotte office doing? I heard they got royally decimated, and that the Greedy Partners may be told in January to sling their hooks, regardless of huge Gaurantees. (Likewise with Dewey in Charlotte, and K & S needs to pull weight or they are pulling out also)

avatar
192 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 20, 2008 2:31 PM

Any update? Did the Charlotte office survive?

avatar
193 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 20, 2008 3:35 PM

Sonnenschein is doing just fine as a firm. Chairman Portnoy is leading a strategic makeover of the firm to include focus on differentiated practice strengths. Coupled with an economy in deep recession means that certain practices, lawyers and staff are at risk. In the end though this will be a better more strategically focused law firm that is survivor. Can the same be said of so many of these other delusional national firms who profess they have practice strength in everything and aspire to have New York firm profitability? I'd much rather be at a Sonnenschein than a delusional pretender like Bryan Cave or Squire Sanders that will be out of business in 5 years..

avatar
194 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 20, 2008 3:36 PM

Sonnenschein is doing just fine as a firm. Chairman Portnoy is leading a strategic makeover of the firm to include focus on differentiated practice strengths. Coupled with an economy in deep recession means that certain practices, lawyers and staff are at risk. In the end though this will be a better more strategically focused law firm that is survivor. Can the same be said of so many of these other delusional national firms who profess they have practice strength in everything and aspire to have New York firm profitability? I'd much rather be at a Sonnenschein than a delusional pretender like Bryan Cave or Squire Sanders that will be out of business in 5 years..

avatar
195 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 20, 2008 3:36 PM

Sonnenschein is doing just fine as a firm. Chairman Portnoy is leading a strategic makeover of the firm to include focus on differentiated practice strengths. Coupled with an economy in deep recession means that certain practices, lawyers and staff are at risk. In the end though this will be a better more strategically focused law firm that is survivor. Can the same be said of so many of these other delusional national firms who profess they have practice strength in everything and aspire to have New York firm profitability? I'd much rather be at a Sonnenschein than a delusional pretender like Bryan Cave or Squire Sanders that will be out of business in 5 years..

avatar
196 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 20, 2008 3:53 PM

Seriously? 193, 194. Seriously you come on here with that crap? HOWEVER, at least they not as sneaky as Dechert.

Seriously? Is Elie really going to pretend he didn't have his ass handed to him by the commentators in the Dechert thread? Is he going to ignore the Dechert situation and have Kash write all the posts from now on?

avatar
198 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 20, 2008 6:31 PM

Sundontshine Charlotte has to be worried. No way they gonna last past xmas.

avatar
199 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 21, 2008 1:57 PM

They will make it past Christmas. Those KS rats fleeced S for an awful lot of money. Can't see S willing to pull plug just yet.

avatar
200 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:17 AM

The Dechert View on "layoffs":

"In my view, layoffs are when you decide to cut headcount. It's not when you decide to replace people with better people." -- Bart Winokur

avatar
201 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:18 PM

Hey ATL -- SNR just did another round of stealth layoffs last week.

avatar
202 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, March 30, 2009 1:27 PM

How many? Which offices were affected??

Post Your Comment