Add RSS RSS

New Practice Groups Coming to a Firm Near You

wall street bull backside.jpgIt doesn’t always feel like it, but the legal profession is actually very recession proof. Deal work may be drying up, but the Good Book says “Whenever Hank Paulson closes a door, somewhere He opens a window.”

Of course, open windows are pretty dangerous if you work in a Manhattan skyscraper these days, but the National Law Journal peers through the looking glass anyway:

“A year ago we were writing deals, figuring out how to grow businesses and expand products; now the markets are trying to figure out when the next shoe drops,” said Michael Missal, head of the global financial markets group that K&L Gates unveiled on Monday in Washington.

Despite its neutral name, K&L cited the “global economic crisis” as the reason for launching the group.

It’s amazing what clients will pay for. Can you imagine being a Global Economic Crisis attorney and pitching your services to a client?

CLIENT: We’re broke. We can’t get any credit. I’m going to effing kill Nancy Pelosi and her Mr. Slave.
GEC Partner: Well our firm can offer you the latest counsel on how to navigate through these trying times.

CLIENT: Really? So, how do I get a line of credit right now?

GEC PARTNER: I don’t know.

CLIENT: Well, how can I get around this communist era short-selling ban so I can at least make some money on the side?

GEC PARTNER: I have no idea

CLIENT: Well, what can you tell me?

GEC PARTNER: Here we have this wonderful, interactive map. It clearly indicates where you are AND where Nancy Pelosi is at all times. We’ve marked out various firearms shops along the way.

CLIENT: Isn’t this from Grand Theft Auto IV?

GEC PARTNER: That’ll be $700 please.

Bracewell & Giuliani at least calls a spade a spade after the jump.

See if you can follow the logic of Pat Oxford, chairman of Bracewell & Giuliani, who is heading up the firm’s new “financial industry task force.”

“The firm’s perspective on what is happening has to come from as many angles as possible,” Oxford said, noting the ripples of collapsing financial institutions are already reaching Bracewell practice areas ranging from white-collar crime to banking, securities, transactional and many more.

“Anyone who says they know where this is going is full of baloney. We have never experienced anything like this in my lifetime and I am as old as anybody practicing these days,” said Oxford, 66. “The basic architecture of our banking regulatory scheme will change. There are hedge funds and private equity funds that, if you squint your eyes, look like investment banks. We suspect there will be a tsunami of regulation.”

Okay, so we can stipulate that “anyone who says they know where this is going is full of baloney.” So why exactly would anyone pay for lawyers to tell them that nobody knows what is going on?

After the “tsunami of regulation” hits, there should be all kinds of new and interesting legal work to do. But before the tsunami the only thing to do is to get to high ground. Well, apparently nobody has a clue about where high ground is. This is like hiring a Sherpa to help you climb Mount “Invisible.” It sounds like a great idea until you stop and think.

But hey, if you can get terrified clients to pay you for “waiting to see what will happen,” why not? Lawyers gotta eat too.

Firms scramble to launch credit crisis practice groups [National Law Journal]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:40 PM

first!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:40 PM

AWFUL POST!

AND FIRST!

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:40 PM

I can't count.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:41 PM

first (god I feel so dirty)

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:44 PM

structured finance atty here (NYC) - lmao - good post

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:44 PM

Isn't "calling a spade a spade" a racist expression?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:47 PM

6 - blatantly

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:53 PM

Elie, how come you guys haven't posted on the bailout bill. Dealbreaker scooped you guys on the bailout for wooden toy arrows.

http://dealbreaker.com/2008/10/cancel-your-plans.php

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:54 PM

Oh and there's this

Sec. 317 Seven Year Cost Recovery Period for Motorsports Racing Tack Facility pg. 290 WHAT STATE IS THIS RACETRACK LOCATED IN?

Sec. 308 Increase Limit on Cover Over of Rum Excise Tax to Puerto Rico & the Virgin Islands.

Section 506 “Subsection B” The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity & Addiction Relief Act of 208. THIS IS THE BEST HIDDEN GEM OF THEM ALL--hidden as a Subsection under 506.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:57 PM

Guliani's eyetalian - shouldn't it be "full of bologna" ?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:58 PM

6 and, especially, 7 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_call_a_spade_a_spade

Hardly "blatant." And yes, Wikipedia knows all.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:00 PM

I went to Harvard.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:02 PM

11 - Wikipedia is wrong this time. "Calling a spade a spade" goes back as far as the Greek dramatist Menander (4th Century BC). While it's unlikely that the term was originally a racist expression, the 4th Century BC is long after God and the Baby Jesus cursed the son of Noah and created the Hamitic peoples . . .

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:10 PM

13 - so edit it.

6 & 7 - you're thinking of "call a spade a nigger."

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:11 PM

I'm sick of seeing the balls on that bull.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:13 PM

Naked bull balls makes the Baby Jesus cry.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:14 PM

Nice shot of the Wall Street 'Bull" poised to take it where the legislature, the public, and both presidential candidates are about to about to stick it.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:15 PM

15: then don't look. balls are beautiful.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:25 PM

I heard Cadwalader and Katten Muchin formed Covered Bonds groups. At least that's a good-faith attempt to offer real service.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:31 PM

I love Goldberg, Ligner, & Shyster's GEC group.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:34 PM

I went to GULC.

And I feel GULCky.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 4:42 PM

I don't like all this talk about "squint[ing] your eyes" and "tsunamis". Anti-Asian animus, anyone?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 5:49 PM

This is like hiring a Sherpa to help you climb Mount "Invisible." It sounds like a great idea until you stop and think.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 5:59 PM

22,

The phrase is "slant-eye," "chink," "gook,"Charlie," "Jap," or a hundred other moronic terms - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs_by_ethnicity#East_Asian_descent

Squint-eye makes me think of Popeye.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 6:06 PM

Elie, this post fucking sucks. Enough with your dumbass imaginary enactements of legal goings-on. You're a god damn idiot.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 1, 2008 6:11 PM

You pissed me off so badly that I can't even spell...much like you can't spell, MysTTTal.

-25

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 2, 2008 1:43 AM

Does anyone think that Schulte is in trouble as a result of the hit hedge funds are going to take?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 2, 2008 1:51 AM

Does anyone think that Schulte is in trouble as a result of the hit hedge funds are going to take?

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 2, 2008 10:32 AM

Schulte as well as other big firms in their niche must be doing fine at least for now due to lawsuits and dissolutions as a result of this mess.

btw...I sure hope that the provisions mentioned above are not part of the bill the Senate approved today...but it probably is...the roller-coaster continues...

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 2, 2008 11:24 AM

Funnier than hell, Elie, but one change: The partner would charge at least $2,500.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 2, 2008 3:15 PM

Schulte = dirty frathouse.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 2, 2008 3:27 PM

kudos to K&L Washington for finding the silver lining.

Post Your Comment