Add RSS RSS

Welcome back, SCOTUS!

Supreme Court 6 Above the Law blog.JPGIt's the first Monday of October. That means the "open for business" sign is being hung back up at One First Street.

Adam Liptak took a look at the Supreme Court's new strategy for this term in a New York Times article this weekend:

The court is working at a brisker pace than it has in recent years. It is accepting more cases and hearing them earlier in the term. In October and November, the court will hear three arguments a day, rather than the usual two, returning after lunch for the third one.

By frontloading the arguments to the beginning of the term, which generally runs from October to June, the court may be able to issue decisions more regularly and avoid the usual end-of-term barrage of significant rulings.

The National Law Journal has a nice distillation of the particularly interesting cases on the docket this term:

  • Business is seeking federal pre-emption of state personal injury suits in the pharmaceutical drug and tobacco arenas.
  • Employees and employers square off in two job bias cases, one involving retaliation and the other pregnancy leave and retirement credit.
  • Sexual harassment in schools draws the justices into the interplay of two major discrimination statutes.
  • And an unusually large number of environmental cases -- four -- will be argued, ranging from Navy sonar and its effect on marine mammals to the use of cost-benefit analysis in setting environmental standards.
  • Among other issues, there also are "dirty words" in a Fox Television challenge; a free speech challenge involving a monument to the "Seven Aphorisms" of the Summum religion; liability-immunity issues for prosecutors and top federal officials; terror victim compensation lawsuits; and counsel representation in state clemency proceedings.
  • In keeping with the spirit of one case on the docket, FCC v. Fox Television Stations, we'd like to say, "SCOTUS, welcome the f**k back."

    Justices Return to Work, With Less Meaty Docket [New York Times]
    In the New Term, High Stakes for the High Court [The National Law Journal]

    Earlier: SCOTUS to Weigh In on F**king S**t

    Comments
    avatar
    1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 8:04 AM

    This is my first FIRST!

    avatar
    2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 8:09 AM

    Ellie is fat

    avatar
    3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 8:33 AM

    1 (son) - your mom was my first

    avatar
    4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 10:10 AM

    utterly useless, the NYT had a better article over the weekend.

    avatar
    5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 10:20 AM

    SCOTUS to 100 (cases)!

    avatar
    6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 10:24 AM

    Welcome back Ginsburg, Souter, Breyer, and Kennedy.

    The rest of you can move to the flyover states and open your Court of Supreme Fools for the Religous Right and secede from the Union of intelligent secularists.

    avatar
    7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 10:25 AM

    wyeth v. levine = the end of the plaintiffs' bar

    avatar
    8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 11:43 AM

    any clerk hiring news?

    avatar
    9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 12:10 PM

    I can't believe it took you all weekend to cut and paste from two articles. Must have been the last line. Real deep humor. Works on multiple levels. Fucking brilliant.

    avatar
    10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 12:11 PM

    8-
    I hired your mom. Then I clerked her.

    Hey, that was pretty funny, think I can write for ATL?

    avatar
    11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 12:20 PM

    Using ghetto talk to refer to the Supremes. Smart move MysTTTal. In case you were ever thinking of practicing again - don't.

    avatar
    12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 1:24 PM

    kash,

    do me.

    <3,
    #12

    avatar
    13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 2:01 PM

    SCROTUS. Heh heh.

    Oh wait--is that SCOTUS? My bad.

    avatar
    14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 2:04 PM

    11-

    Kash wrote this, not Mystal. Slip in a puddle of AIDS and die.

    avatar
    15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 6, 2008 3:06 PM

    Seriously, 6? You don't dig Stevens?

    Post Your Comment