Add RSS RSS

Brand New U.S. News Rankings: Colleges and Universities of the World

world college rankings.JPGI know it’s not exactly “legal” news, but U.S. News and World Report just released their rankings of the top 200 Colleges and Universities in the World.

Thanks to Paul Caron at TaxProf Blog, I’m bringing the information to you instead of enjoying the company of my wife, or friends, or dog, or PS3.

Here are the T-14 top 10 schools on the list:

1. Harvard

2. Yale

3. Cambridge [Harvard’s on here twice. WooHoo!]

4. Oxford

5. Cal Tech

6. Imperial College London

7. University College London

8. University of Chicago

9. MIT

10. Columbia

The highest ranked non-U.S., non-U.K. school on the list is the 16th ranked Australian National University. University of Tokyo clocks in at 19, and McGill is 20th.

To be honest, I have no earthly idea how you compare Boston University (ranked 46) against Trinity College Dublin (ranked 49th), but that’s why the U.S. News people get the big bucks I guess (assuming of course that U.S. News still pays people).

U.S. News Top 200 Colleges & Universities in the World [TaxProf Blog]
World’s Best Colleges and Universities: Top 200 [U.S. News]

Earlier: Top Law Schools Based On Top Lawyers
Princeton Review Ranks Law Schools Too

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 11:45 PM

First!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 11:46 PM

Sadly second. And who gives a shit? Other than Harvard trolls, apparently.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 11:50 PM

These pretzels blah blah.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 11:52 PM

Really? Another rah-rah Harvard post. You fat fuck.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 11:55 PM

How the hell is Stanford 17? Perfect 100's on Academic Peer and Employer reviews. The best Student-To-Faculty ratio of anyone in the top 20. Just lower on international prof's and students, and THAT drops you so low? Amazing...

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 11:58 PM

These "rankings" are ridiculous. What a joke. We should just start making our own damn rankings and peddling them to idiots around the country/world.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:01 AM

Duke should be higher. Stupid stripper killed our prestige.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:02 AM

NYU should be in the top 5. We're just as good as Columbia.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:11 AM

7 -- that should raise your prestige.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:11 AM

Joke

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:14 AM

US News can photocopy my balls

12 Posted by nervous T10 1L | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:21 AM

go blue! best public in the world!

now if only it would get me a job.

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:30 AM

Elie - your stock is going up, up, up. Keep this late night posting up, and I will take back all I ever said about the grammatical errors.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:56 AM

Wow. I usually support anything the USNews people do, but these rankings are ludicrous. 1 component involves student quality. somehow international faculty has some bearing on the quality of the university? And the # international students is a component? Lame. never once was one of my classes better because there was a brit or a bulgarian. More importantly i wasn't better, the material wasn't clearer, i didn't learn more or more in-depth because of an int'l prof/student.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:57 AM

Harvard, America's McGill

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:58 AM

I'm sorry, UVA is not one notch above Pitt. End of story.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:01 AM

Cornell is about right

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:02 AM

Cornell..... ever heard of it?

A. Bernard

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:05 AM

I know it's not legal?! What the fuck?! This reminds me of my favorite hockey blog that talks about fucking football! Jesus...

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:19 AM

Proofreading aside, Mystal, you have been doing a fantastic job lately. Late night posts, good content, etc, etc. Please start reporting on staff bonuses too...I am freaking out over here.
PS-Lat good job on whipping the new EIC into shape.(not a knock on actual weight or ethnicity)

****Here come the #20(or whatever number I am) is racist comments***

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:37 AM

Columbia to 190K!!!!!

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:49 AM

#20 is not racist

Elie, keep up the late night posts. Sadly, I am working on my outlines at 12pm on a Friday so it’s nice to have something new on the blog.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:50 AM

#20 is not racist

Elie, keep up the late night posts. Sadly, I am working on my outlines at 12am on a Friday so it’s nice to have something new on the blog.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:50 AM

"How the hell is Stanford 17? Perfect 100's on Academic Peer and Employer reviews. The best Student-To-Faculty ratio of anyone in the top 20. Just lower on international prof's and students, and THAT drops you so low? Amazing..."

You seem to have misunderstood the methodology. All the rankings are out of 100 - including the student-to-faculty one. Stanford has the worst student-to-faculty ratio in the top 20, not the best. That's what crushes it.

25 Posted by ShortBus | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:04 AM

This rating is just ridiculous.

First of all, using the number of foreign students as a criterion is absurd. Just what the world needs - more Saudi princes lowering the academic standards of the world's best institutions even further. Bullshit.

Harvard number one and Princeton nowhere to be seen in the top 10? Talked to H grads much - who in their honest moments bitch endlessly about how many clueless grad students "imparted" knowledge to them?

Stanford not in the top 10? Give me an effing break.

Nice to see CalTech, MIT and UChicago recognised as the fantastic universities they are though.

26 Posted by ShortBus | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:05 AM

This rating is just ridiculous.

First of all, using the number of foreign students as a criterion is absurd. Just what the world needs - more Saudi princes lowering the academic standards of the world's best institutions even further. Bullshit.

Harvard number one and Princeton nowhere to be seen in the top 10? Talked to H grads much - who in their honest moments bitch endlessly about how many clueless grad students "imparted" knowledge to them?

Stanford not in the top 10? Give me an effing break.

Nice to see CalTech, MIT and UChicago recognised as the fantastic universities they are though.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:06 AM

What a funny idea - not ranking the best universities in the world but the best world universities - only reason I can think of for making proportion of international student and faculty an important indicator.

And who the hell gave Boston U that high of an academic reputation ranking? Must have had them confused with that other public school in the city, MIT.

Finally, the UvA (53) is not the best university in the Netherlands, certainly not a jillion spots better than Delft.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:22 AM

"And who the hell gave Boston U that high of an academic reputation ranking? Must have had them confused with that other public school in the city, MIT."

Neither BU nor MIT are public.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:51 AM

Caltech is a blister on MIT's arse. Who are they kidding?

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:55 AM

Guys in my low-rated university used to blow off lists like this in favor of, you know, nailing chics and drinking beer. It was no big deal.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:44 AM

28: That's not true. BU and MIT are both public universities, just like UPenn. Public Unis can be great too you know - you don't have to be such a snob about it.

-27

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 5:44 AM

UofT 40, UBC 33, McGill 20? Bullshit. U of T has been ranked the best school in Canada since confederation. All my idiot pothead friends went to MCGill and studied pop music appreciation. Suck my long, thick Canadian dong US News.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 6:50 AM

24: Ah, that does make more sense. Thank you. Hopefully Stanford finds a way to cheat and skew that student-to-faculty ratio better in the future. :-)

- 20

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:42 AM

Elie's "enjoying the company of my wife" = "stuffing my face with deep-fried HoHos."

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:59 AM

1141PM on a Friday, plus the Mukasey scoop.
Elie you are a pimp, NYU cracks notwithstanding.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 8:01 AM

It warms my heart that Georgetown, the most overrated university in America, sits ignominiously at 110.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 8:16 AM

Please stop posting things that solely appear to the XOXO prestige-whore crowd. It will really kill this site.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 8:21 AM

32 -- Wake up call Nobody outside of Canada has heard of Uoft, but we have heard of McGill.


avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 8:29 AM

What a load of bull. Not a single Liberal Arts College on the whole list...

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 8:33 AM

39, maybe that's because liberal arts colleges actually are worthless?

Think of USNews's normal ranking of US LACs, made separately from the ranking of US universities, as akin to a list of the world's tallest midgets.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 8:39 AM

i degree from amherst is always going to be worth much. much more than Umass amherst, yet umass makes the list.


love how Penn State is ranked higher than G-town, im sure every year 100s of people pick penn state instead

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 8:53 AM

Stony Brook (Stony Brook!!!) is ranked higher than Notre Dame.

I think that just about solidifies this list as unworthy of wiping the A$$ of half-Skadden

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 9:16 AM

32 = FAIL. Maclean's has ranked McGill #1 the last three years at least. Granted U of T's law school has been ranked #1 for a long time.

15, I used to have a t-shirt that said that.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 9:44 AM

I don't understand the "Harvard is on here twice" comment. Cambridge is a university in London. What does that have to do with Harvard?

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 9:50 AM

The late night postings are great. All else we need is for you to proofread your blogs and ATL will be back on top.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:01 AM

35 -- I'll grant the late posting is nice, but the scoop was Lat, not Elie.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:02 AM

Elie is a FAT FUCK. That's all.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:02 AM

Good job, Elie! All we need now is a post on PEANUTS and CHEESE! Bring it, Dawg! Bring that shit!

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:05 AM

Nice job, Elie! All we need now is a post on PEANUTS and CHEESE! Bring it, Dawg! Bring that shit!

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:15 AM

How in the f- does Notre Dame wind up in the top 200 of anything? It's a repository for Catholics of middling intellecutal abilities who want to feign accomplishment. How many middle managers are out there still clinging to "I went to Notre Dame" to hide their lack of accomplishment?

That school has failed to contribute anything relevant to scholarship ever. It's basically Valparaiso with a higher tuition.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:21 AM

UofT? is that the trade school in Toronto with 50K+ undergrads? Is there anyone that doesn't get into UofT?

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:21 AM

UofT? is that the trade school in Toronto with 50K+ undergrads? Is there anyone that doesn't get into UofT?

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:25 AM

51/52 - Yes, everyone that goes to York.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:26 AM

Wow, 50. What's with all the hate for ND? Given the tone of your post, it sounds like someone has an axe to grind.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:27 AM

Well if you folks read the results, UofT has a bad student-faculty ratio and lower int'l faculty/student proportion than McGill, but kicks McGill's ass on citations.

Obviously they're trying to rate educational experience with student-faculty ratio and int'l prestige (deserved or not).

And for you Americans bashing Canadian schools, at least we aren't saddled with massive debt - we pay less in law school than many of you folks pay in undergrad.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:32 AM

isn't mcgill where entitled kids from the US go so they can claim they went to the harvard of canada? right. i think it is. hmmmm.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:34 AM

50 -- Where did you go to school?

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:47 AM

woohoo Cornell 15

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:48 AM

a liberal arts education is worth exactly what you would pay for the easy route to the law school it gets you to. In this economy, that value is somewhat suspect, I'll grant you.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:08 AM

I believe U of P was left off your list...it's #6 on the list?

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:08 AM

I believe U of P was left off your list...it's #6 on the list?

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:08 AM

I believe U of P was left off your list...it's #6 on the list?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:09 AM

I believe U of P was left off your list...it's #6 on the list?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:14 AM

Wait, I thought NYU was T5?

- Proud CLS 2L Stud

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:19 AM

U of T huh? C'mon University of Texas isn't in Canada!

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:49 AM

hey elie- i wanted to send you a tip but the send tips icon doesn't work. you should post your email address more prominently on the website. anyway, my friend told me that 5 associates from his group just got fired from schulte. no severance! you should investigate/post about this.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:49 AM

hey elie- i wanted to send you a tip but the send tips icon doesn't work. you should post your email address more prominently on the website. anyway, my friend told me that 5 associates from his group just got fired from schulte. no severance! you should investigate/post about this.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:50 AM

hey elie- i wanted to send you a tip but the send tips icon doesn't work. you should post your email address more prominently on the website. anyway, my friend told me that 5 associates from his group just got fired from schulte. no severance! you should investigate/post about this.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:51 AM

good post.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:14 PM

43 - how was Planets, Stars and Galaxies? As good as your course on The Beatles? U of T has the best law school, the best med school, and the best PhD programs in Canada by far. The reason you have been at the top of the rankings for three years is because we withdrew three years ago.

51 - 3 campuses, jerkoff. Anyone who had less than an 85% average didn't get in to U of T when I matriculated. I also got into Princeton and Harvard, fwiw.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:24 PM

any ranking that places UCLA above UC Berkeley academically is flawed. most people outside of the US have never even heard of UCLA.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:25 PM

what fucking horseshit.

who cares how many dirty foreigenr students and faculty you have?

Blatant east coast pederast trolling.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:56 PM

Even more usless than USN&W's domestic rankings. Why did I even bother...

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:59 PM

US News & World Report would rank the shapes of assholes - and provide a corresponding methodology - if this generated any public interest.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:01 PM

32, in terms you'll understand, "YOUR A FAG".

Any retard with a pulse can get into U of T Mississauga campus, and come out with an indistinguishable U of T degree. They are meaningless. For undergrad purposes, McGill is the only school in Canada I respect. But no other country in the world touches America. Look to endowments.. U of T has a little over a billion I think; Harvard $36B.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:07 PM

Dispair not, the rankings will go away one day.

As Elie linked, US News is now going from weekly to monthly. They can't make money. Eventually, they'll disappear from print and they'll just be publishers of lists.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:26 PM

posting rankings makes Elie a good blogger all of a sudden?

well, it's nice to see the kind of low standards to which readers of this blog have become accustomed.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:29 PM

notre dame blows. it's a repository of midwesterners trying to be elite. tin the midwest northwestern and u of chicago don't even consider notre dame in the same breath.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:33 PM

71 - UCLA is actually one of the more recognized universities outside of the US (see, e.g., http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/news/2005/apr/05/ucla-name-la-lifestyle-marketa/), but in any event, I do think that the rankings are flawed, only because UCLA is consistently outranked by Berkeley (and UVA) in the US News rankings for best colleges in the US, but is supposedly a "better" school than Cal or UVA under these world rankings.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:33 PM

These rankings are BS

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:39 PM

70 - So UofT withdrew, yet it's ranked third this year. How does that work?

And yes the History of Pop Music was a lot of fun. Kind of like living in Montreal for four years - as opposed to the centre of the Universe, i.e., Toronto.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:46 PM

People from UofT just don't get it. McGill has a prestige that is known throughout the world. Toronto just doesn't have that. Do Americans flock to the T-DOT? No -- they come to McGill because it's a school their parents regard as being (almost) up to par with good U.S. schools.

Oh ya, and I would rather stick needles in my eyes than live in Toronto. Talk about an NYC wannabe, without any of the charm.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:51 PM

The rankings are a fucking joke. northwestern below ucla? And northwestern peer academic reputation = 88, ucla = 100.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:56 PM

74 wins.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:09 PM

82: You cannot have lived in either NYC or Toronto. NYC may be a lot of things but "charming" it is not.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:14 PM

What a load of crap.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:14 PM

Who knew they let Canadians into the legal profession?

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:19 PM

Student faculty ratio? Who cares.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:31 PM

Hey 87 - we're coming to take your jobs. Deal with it sucka.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:35 PM

Somehow the other world rankings consistently stick Stanford and Berkeley in the top 10 but US news decides to kick em down a notch.

Ahh more useless metrics.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:39 PM

THIS IS NOT LEGAL NEWS! ATL - please get a new blogger - this one sucks. Lat we need you back.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:42 PM

But it still has managed to generate almost 100 comments....

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:44 PM

92=elie

94 Posted by Ivy League Gunner | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:54 PM

test

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:55 PM

Really? Georgetown being in 110 looks good to you?

When your firm and industry goes down the drain, you pathetic crazies come crawling to Congress to bail you out, and that means whispering and begging in the ears of Georgetown Chief of Staffs and Legislative Aides.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:57 PM

Elie, is the "wife" actually your "hand?" Also, we know you don't have friends or a dog, so please stop making up stuff.

97 Posted by HofstraMagna | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:58 PM

This list a joke, Hofstra is nowhere to be found and Stony Brook is number 127. Hofstra dominates Stony Brook and should be somewhere around 100, at the lowest.

98 Posted by nervous T10 1L | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:12 PM

...well at least we still have better academics than OSU.

go blue?

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:25 PM

LOL@ Hofstra.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:33 PM

OK, point about how useful this list is:

BU rank on "international" list: 46

BU rank on "US only" list: 60

Add more competition and BU gets ranked HIGHER?? Its not even consistent WITHIN US News lists. I'm assuming this means the criteria are different, which means this list is about as relevant and useful as those law school ranking lists from "Who the Hell Are They" authors that claim Thomas Cooley is the 11th best law school in the country.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:39 PM

These rankings are just barely more valid than those ones that had Wabash and Centre College beating half the Ivies.

Too High:
Caltech (5), Penn (11), Cornell (15), Michigan (18), McGill (20), UCLA (30), BU (46),

Too Low:
MIT, (9), Stanford (17), Berkeley (36), UVA (96), Georgetown (110), Notre Dame (168)

Just Right:
NYU (40), Wash U (60), Emory (62), Texas (70), Colorado (180), Brandeis (185)

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:42 PM

100, Thomas Cooley is a damn good law school. Are you trying to say that library square footage and number of seats in the library aren't a good way to determine the best law school?

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:44 PM

i think that rankings should be based on the ratio of PEANUTS TO CHEESE and the number of employees placed at WILDMAN HARROLD as opposed to the rediculous factors discussed above (e.g. educational quality)

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:54 PM

It must suck to go to McGill. Quebec students pay $3500 per year and other Cdn students pay $7000. Then they get hired in NY for exactly the same salary and with exactly the same career prospects as someone who paid 10x as much. A summer associate in NY from McGill can pay off their ENTIRE law school tuition by working for a few weeks.

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:56 PM

Oh, and even if you go to McGill as an international student, it's less than $17,000. And, like Ukraine, the Canadian dollar is weak. The Quebec dollar is even weaker.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:08 PM

WashU got shanked. We are tied with Cornell in national rankings, but then get shafted down to 60 in the world? Below the University of Washington????

Very bizzarre.

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:10 PM

Any ranking that puts BC above ND or BU above BC is garbage.

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:12 PM

40,

Agree most liberal arts college are jokes, but the top New England ones (Williams, Wesleyan, Amherst, Bowdoin, etc.) are competitive with the top Universities In Forbes ranking there were like 10 in the top 25

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:19 PM

Right. Everyone outside the US knows that Oxford is #1 and Cambridge is #2. Silly Americans.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:49 PM

Elie,

Stealth layoffs at Brobeck. True story. Follow up on it.

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:51 PM

Silly

112 Posted by nervous T10 1L | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:53 PM

i can't believe penn is going to the rose bowl and not michigan! i knew i should've went there...

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 5:23 PM

107: or any ranking that puts BU above Northeastern is just crap.

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 5:46 PM

University of Uppsala at 63 over University of Lund at 88 is just plain stupid. At least Chalmers got pwned...

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 5:50 PM

Penn at 105 is hilarious - that's what you get for putting the law school in Dickinson...

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 6:10 PM

31 - "That's not true. BU and MIT are both public universities, just like UPenn. Public Unis can be great too you know - you don't have to be such a snob about it."

MIT is not public. I know, I went there. It is definitely not public.

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 6:19 PM

please, enough of the masturbatory Harvard posts. we promise not to forget you went to Harvard and that Harvard is a top school. now leave it alone for 10 fucking minutes and talk about something else, maybe something about law?

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 6:34 PM

What do you gentlemen use for your manscaping needs?

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 6:40 PM

31, 116 - Not only is MIT not a public university, BU is also not a public university.

31 must have assumed they were public because their names included Boston and Massachusetts. WRONG

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 6:52 PM

106, everyone knows WashU is ridiculously overrated and its high US News Ranking is more a product of gaming the system (sending applications to every high school student with a pulse to get its selectivity up) than it truly being a top school. Regardless of the crap that Cornell and Brown get, would anyone really take WashU over either of them?

The WSJ rankings from a couple of years ago based upon how many students at each college got into elite law / med / business schools also back up the fact that WashU (ranked 47) is unimpressive: http://www.wsjclassroomedition.com/pdfs/wsj_college_092503.pdf

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:00 PM

For all of you who like to attack proof reading, Caltech is not two words. Somehow people get Cal Tech out of it, but please, it's written right there on the list, "Caltech."
Also, all those MIT people hating on Caltech because they had to spend their winters 40 degrees colder, you can be comforted at that fact that Caltech is only ranked higher because it is stronger academically. The MIT sports programs are much better.

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:14 PM

121: Eh, I see your point, but the fact that the school's official name is "The California Institute of Technology," splitting the name into two words isn't as ridiculous as it might otherwise be. Every other school with "Tech" in its name goes with two words too: Georgia Tech, Illinois Tech, Louisiana Tech, Texas Tech, Virginia Tech, etc.

If you're going against convention, then you have to be prepared for confusion / mistakes -- much like how the University of [State Name] are public schools except for our insecure Penn friends. Things are looking up though -- at least they're heading to the Rose Bowl!

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:25 PM

Um, this list makes no sense. I mean it does not even match up with their normal US-based ranking. UVA at 96 behind UCLA and BU? Please.

avatar
124 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:33 PM

at least 12 firings at Schulte!!! less than 2 months' notice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! no severance!!!!! investigate!!!!! TTT TTTT TTTTTTTTT

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:33 PM

at least 12 firings at Schulte!!! less than 2 months' notice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! no severance!!!!! investigate!!!!! TTT TTTT TTTTTTTTT

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:33 PM

at least 12 firings at Schulte!!! less than 2 months' notice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! no severance!!!!! investigate!!!!! TTT TTTT TTTTTTTTT

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:33 PM

at least 12 firings at Schulte!!! less than 2 months' notice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! no severance!!!!! investigate!!!!! TTT TTTT TTTTTTTTT

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:33 PM

at least 12 firings at Schulte!!! less than 2 months' notice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! no severance!!!!! investigate!!!!! TTT TTTT TTTTTTTTT

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 8:15 PM

McGill!

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 9:14 PM

PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!
PEANUTS AND CHEESE, BEE-OTCHES!

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 9:23 PM

116 and 119,

What do you mean MIT, BU, and UPenn aren't public? It is BOSTON University, the MASSACHUSETTS Institute of Tech, and the University OF PENNSYLVANIA. I mean, c'mon, I know this blog is jammed with private school snobs, but did you guys fail grammar class or what?!?

-27 and 31

avatar
132 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 9:30 PM

As a Canadian (at a US law school), I can confirm that any retard can get into U of T or McGill.

The name of the game in Canada is the program. Both schools take people with the equivalent of C averages in high school in either of their Arts programs. On the other hand, they both have specific programs that are very competitive--they change over time but when I started undergrad, you needed the equivalent of a 3.9 in high school to get into Engineering Science at U of T. It's not like Harvard or Yale (which, by the way, along with other good US schools, most capable Canadians go to for undergrad) where everyone but the trust fund babies is smart. The quality of the student body, taken as a whole, at both schools is comparable with, say, a Boise State or a University of Delaware.

The faculties have high peer review scores because both schools are enormous and have large international (read: American-trained) faculties. I also assume they included Canadian peer review journals.

That does not change the fact that--again, as someone who has interacted with "the academic elite" both sides of the border--most Canadians have the ambition, self awareness, and intelligence of your average American homeless man.

avatar
133 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:34 PM

Seriously, folks, what do you use to tame your manbush? My dark and curly forest needs some attention.

avatar
134 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:41 PM

133, best comment e-v-a-r

avatar
135 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:46 PM

the next person to comment to the effect that the US rankings don't match the international rankings gets a cookie. Don't worry, I have a truck load.

Seriously, am I the only one who thinks it's not entirely unreasonable to use different metrics for the US and international rankings? And once you allow for one small change, isn't it obvious that you could then seen significant movement up/down the list for some schools

avatar
136 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 10:55 PM

132 - Canadian at a US law school... I guess you couldn't get in to UofT for law school, eh?

avatar
137 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 11:21 PM

44: I think you need to re-take your geography class...

avatar
139 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 12:36 AM

Caltech above MIT on another list?

Thats right bitches!

avatar
140 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:28 AM

Caltech is to MIT as the Tit-mouse is to a Kangaroo.

A small, shitty rendition.

avatar
141 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:42 AM

Guys in my high school named Elie were fat fucks. It was no big deal.

avatar
142 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:10 AM

Michigan = best school in the country

avatar
143 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:20 AM

I'm shocked at how high Duke and UCLA are.

Oh, thats right, this retarded lists values masses of asians.

avatar
144 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:22 AM

U.S. News & World Report is proud to publish our first ever World's Best Colleges and Universities rankings. These rankings are based on data from the THE-QS World University Rankings, which were produced in association with QS Quacquarelli Symonds. QS Quacquarelli Symonds, one of the world's leading networks for careers and education, has been publishing world rankings since 2004. These rankings have obtained increasing influence among academics worldwide and have a growing impact among prospective students and government policymakers.

The link clearly states that the rankings are not from US News.

avatar
145 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:32 AM

Here is the link to the actual source:

http://www.topuniversities.com/worlduniversityrankings/results/2008/overall_rankings/top_100_universities/

avatar
146 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 11:04 AM

78:
Most people in the world of high stakes academics don't put Northwestern and the University of Chicago in the same breath.

avatar
147 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 11:23 AM

Let's start another rankings list - perhaps "Top 10 News Magazines Printed in English."

1. Newsweek
2. Highlights
3. US Weekly
4. People
5. Time
6. Playboy
7. Soldier of Fortune
8. Air & Space Law
9. O, The Oprah Magazine
10. US News & World Report

avatar
148 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 12:00 PM

MIT LAW FTW

these rankings are total gay parade and need to stay in the shade

avatar
149 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 1:09 PM

147, you forgot "Garden & Gun Magazine: Soul of the New South"

http://gardenandgun.com/

150 Posted by nervous T10 1L | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 1:48 PM

146:

most people in the world of high stakes academics are virgins...just sayin.

*hustles back to the job search*

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
151 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 1:49 PM

150:
Conceded.
-146

avatar
152 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:04 PM

Go Oxford
Shoo the tabs

avatar
153 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:26 PM

This list is a waste of internet space.

avatar
154 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:41 PM

It surprises my how low Georgetown ranks on an international rankings list considering how many children of high-level people from across the globe go there to study international affairs. People around the world have heard of Georgetown, but not so much many of the schools "ranked" higher.

avatar
155 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 4:03 PM

154-
However well-known Georgetown in international affairs, it is not considered in the same league as the top ten research institutions listed above - think about scholarly contributions in math, physics, biology, medicine, even social sciences like psychology, sociology, anthropology; Georgetown doesn't do it all, across the board, on a world-class like those other universities.

avatar
156 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 4:31 PM

Clearly University of Fitzburger should be ranked higher on the list. It has the highest concentration of foreign students in it's basket weaving program. People come from all around the world to study there. They come especially for the upper level underwater basket class.

avatar
157 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 6:55 PM

Cambridge in not in London.

avatar
158 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:00 PM

I defy you to name one program at McGill that is more highly regarded than its UofT equivalent. Being in Montreal is not a program.

Furthermore, Montreal is decrepit and full of Quebs.

Also, how did UofMontreal beat Concordia, let alone Queen's?

avatar
159 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:24 PM

Did I just enter another dimension through the Internet? A place where anything in or related to Canada is suddenly the least bit relevant? Hopefully my "back" button will restore order and take me to the rightful world where no one (even Canadians) gives a fuck about the land of maple and funny modes of speech that functions as my geographic hat.

160 Posted by Michelle Obama | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:46 PM

Let's have another top 10 lists. Top 10 NBA players (past and present) who I resemble. WNBA players are not allowed in this list.

avatar
161 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:47 PM

It's pretty clear that MIT has more socially adept and attractive people than Caltech, and they are far better at sports and probably at say, life. Caltech has people with higher SAT scores and a harder core program (MIT people, does every one of you have to take quantum mechanics?) and has a higher percentage of people getting PhDs. Both require crazy hard work and make law school look like a cake walk.

avatar
162 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 9:14 PM

1) U of Darfur
2) DeVry - Western New York Campus
3) McGill
4) Allegheny College
5) U of Flint
6) Venice Beach Institute of Technology
7) Washington University in E. St. Louis
8) Windsor
9) Tijuana U
10) Gaza Hebrew
11) Jimmy Carter A&M
12) Belfast Catholic
13) Trent
13) Lakehead
13) Brock
16) Tulane
17) Wu-Tang Slums of Shaolin Academy
18) Abercrombie University
19) Kissinger U
20) U of W Hollywood

163 Posted by nervous T10 1L | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:03 PM

well abovethelaw.com, you've been good to me over the weeks and months and i would just like to say thanks for all the support and well wishes (and job offers to my email address).

a week from tomorrow my mail merge goes out...i can only hope to get some interviews. i will be sure to keep you all updated on my successes and (more likely) failures.

i love you all (especially you elie)!!!

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
164 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:06 PM

"It's pretty clear that MIT has more socially adept and attractive people than Caltech, and they are far better at sports and probably at say, life."

lol if this was in any way serious

but yeah, Princeton losing to Penn State and Columbia? What?

avatar
165 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:26 PM

162 - genius. Numbers 7 and 12 are the best.

avatar
166 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:27 PM

164, the Princeton explanation is that the survey is heavily biased toward larger schools / ones with lots of grad programs no matter how frivolous (ex, Cornell). Because international students make up such a larger proportion of grad students than undergrad students, the survey is inherently going to be titled that way,

This explains why Brown did extremely poorly, Dartmouth barely had a pulse, and liberal arts schools didn't appear in the rankings at all.

avatar
167 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 11:01 PM

McGill ranked higher than UofT? Zoot alor!

avatar
168 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 11:28 PM

Cock, Balls

avatar
169 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, November 23, 2008 11:30 PM

the best part is, however put "3. Cambridge [Harvard's on here twice. WooHoo!]" is probably from harvard... and the fact that they don't know that Cambridge is a separate university in England makes one wonder whether Harvard should be #1 on the list...

avatar
170 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 12:08 AM

169 - "is probably from harvard?" Are you an Idiot? Look at the by-line moron. I hate ignorance, you make me sick.

avatar
171 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 12:40 AM

The funny thing about the Cambridge/Harvard comments is that several posters accusing Elie of not knowing that Cambridge =/= Harvard actually think Cambridge is in London. Sigh.

-not elie

avatar
172 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 1:10 AM

162, you forgot to include Bates College in that list - surely the most overrated institution om Earth.

The reason BU is 48 on the 'world' list and 60 on the US list is because half of Middle East aristocracy attend it. I live in a 'no students' building near BU, which is nevertheless populated by Saudi and Iranian undergrads who never seem to go to class, but do seem to drive their Bentley convertible / Maserati Quarttroporte / MB SL65AMG / Cayenne Turbo to Louis Boston / Saks / Barneys / Newbury Street / Copley Place / Natick Collectiom on a daily basis. That's why BU is ranked higher internationally. Fortunately, some of them are devastatingly attractive and fully adapted to Western conventions...

avatar
173 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 6:27 AM

I think someone mixed up the blue and white laundry. Penn State at 105 versus Georgetown at 110. There has to be some reckless or wanton disregard for the truth there.

avatar
174 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 8:03 AM

Hey typo-Nazis! I found a typo you all can swoon over. It’s in an associated press article—the big leagues. Look-e-here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap_travel/20081121/ap_tr_ge/lt_travel_brief_mexico_living_at_airport

The offending sentence reads: “and since Nohara's visa is valid all Mexican officials can do it wait for it to expire in early March.”

Now, since the AP is leaving their typos for us to correct, make sure you tell them to leave a note there about the correction.

avatar
175 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 8:10 AM

I love cock

avatar
176 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 8:54 AM

The only thing that was acurate about that website is that U Penn State was above Georgetown

avatar
177 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 10:14 AM

Michigan over Tokyo FTW.

BU and their terrorist mafia cartel stink.

avatar
178 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 10:16 AM

this is crap - Harvard #1, Columbia #10, but McGill only #20? everyone knows that Canadians are infinitely smarter than Americans (and the comments to this blog prove the point).

avatar
179 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 10:28 AM

I'm studying at Trinity College Dublin and the whole place is a complete joke. have no idea how it ranks above any mediocre school in the states

avatar
180 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 10:48 AM

These rankings are silly. There is no way that you can effectively compare and contrast every facet of these institutions in order to rate and rank them with any semblance of worth. The best a list like this could do would be to compare individual programs at universities so they could at least attempt to normalize the educational requirements and job prospects. For example, take University of Illinois Urbana Champaign and compare your average electrical engineering student to the same schools average history (for example) student. The EE kid is going to have tons of job prospects and a much more difficult course load taught by really talented professors. I'm not trying to put down history as a major, but the entrance requirement differential of UofI's engineering college vs. the rest of the university is rather staggering.

avatar
181 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 10:59 AM

Harvard's overrated; they let in mentally challenged kids like Elie. Not that it isn't noble that they let kids like Elie feel like they are smart (just like the intelligent kids who are able to use proper grammar and spell check), but it still devalues the university.

avatar
182 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 11:12 AM

I agree that they missed the boat by not including liberal arts schools. Additionally, I would like to add Davidson College for consideration. Not only do they have fantastic academics, but the community and sports make it a top notch school...on any ratings scheme.

avatar
183 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 11:49 AM

Where is UPenn St on the list?

avatar
184 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 12:49 PM

This is the dumbest thing I have every read. World rankings--and the rankings do not even track the regular US rankings?

Wonder how well U.Tokyo ranked for diversity.

Gimme a break.

avatar
185 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 1:39 PM

Except for the stupid "employer review" category, Caltech would be #1.

Caltech is 1/10 the size of the rest, so many employers have not had much contact with alumni.

No doubt Caltech is the most elite of the bunch.

avatar
186 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 1:52 PM

Amusing ranking. Oxford and Cambridge above any of the ivy league or MIT is a joke, right? The entry requirements for those schools are not even close to the US colleges. This is just another amusing ranking from people that could not even get into the schools they are judging.

avatar
187 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 1:54 PM

Amusing ranking. Oxford and Cambridge above any of the ivy league or MIT is a joke, right? The entry requirements for those schools are not even close to the US colleges. This is just another amusing ranking from people that could not even get into the schools they are judging.

avatar
188 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 2:18 PM

Columbia > Princeton. Yes!

avatar
189 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 2:59 PM

What on Earth does "proportion of international faculty " or "proportion of international students" have to do with the quality of a school?

If the non-american u had all white American teachers and all white American students, then they would have 100% international students and 100% internationaly faculty.

What does this "international" inquiry have to do with anything?

No wonder the lists misplaces great schools like Princeton and UVA, and elevates average schools like BU and UCLA.

190 Posted by hofstrasucks | Permalink Thursday, November 27, 2008 1:03 PM

HofstraMagna-

My mother attended Stony Brook for undergrad back in the 60's. She found it to be an excellent school. The only thing she said she didn't like was when HofsTTTra students visited friends there, because they were a bunch of insecure toileteer moronic guidos.

Post Your Comment