Add RSS RSS

Hughes Hubbard and Squire Sanders will get the big bailout bucks

Hughes Hubbard Squire Sanders.jpgThe latest bailout news is making Simpson Thacher’s $300,000 contract to advise the Treasury Department on the $700 billion bailout plan look even more like chump change.

We wrote before about firms that were offered bailout love. Well, Reuters reports that Hughes Hubbard and Squire Sanders are going to get mad bailout love, to the tune of $11 million:

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP and Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLP have each been awarded a contract for roughly $5.5 million to help shepherd about 2,000 financial firms through the program that would see the government buy company shares, the Treasury Department said on Monday.

Looks like Hughes Hubbard’s strategizing with the acquisition of boutique bankruptcy firm Luskin, Stern & Eisler may have paid off.

Two law firms to help U.S. Treasury dole out aid [Reuters]
The End of Bailout Transparency Already? [BailoutSleuth via WSJ Law Blog]

Earlier: The Firms That Were Offered Bailout Love
Musical Chairs: Hughes Hubbard Is Ready For Some Action

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:23 PM

Squire is news?

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:23 PM

$5.5 million is chunk change in the scheme of things for NYC firms...

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:23 PM

Too bad SSD is such a shit hole.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:24 PM

This means nothing in light of the fact that the Black Panthers are beating up the white employees at K&E and Sidley Austin in Chicago.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:26 PM

Elie is fat.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:27 PM

I wish the Black Panthers would beat up Ellie.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:32 PM

Kash, I love you! At least you gave us some "legal world" news and not nonsense like your colleague (who certainly is not in the same league).

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:35 PM

MysTTTal

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:35 PM

Now wonder Seyfarth Shaw wants to merge with them...

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:35 PM

No wonder Seyfarth Shaw wants to merge with them...

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:36 PM

Kash, way to carry the blog

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:38 PM

http://www.mass.gov/bbe/results.htm

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:43 PM

Finally, a decent post.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:45 PM

Kash to editor of ATL.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:47 PM

Anybody else happy Simpson TTThatcher is getting the shafTTT?

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:51 PM

#2 - it is called chump change not chunk change

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:53 PM

Elie Mystall is Chunk Change

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:55 PM

That's probably on average what one litigation or HSR filing or internal investigation brings in a month at a top NY firm.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 3:58 PM

When will Elie finally be pulled? Seriously.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:01 PM

$5.5 million wow... to bad to make that much they have to represent 2,000 clients.

It takes TTT firms 2,000 clients to make what top firms get from 2~4ish

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:02 PM

20 - you are a fucking retard.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:03 PM

@17...LOL

Kash saves the day...or Elie was going to post but mutiny is at hand here and Elie is about to castrated so Lat stepped in and said why don't we let the lovely Kash run with this one becaue the natives are restless.

Elie stay the fuck off of ATL for the rest of the day.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:05 PM

#15 - Why the hate? Since if you went to a peer or better firm you wouldn't care what Simpson does, they must have done someDING to you...but what...

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:10 PM

mysTTTal

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:10 PM

What?!? A post that is not about the great Obama or the meany McCain?!? Oh wait, Elie didn't write this posting....

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:16 PM

I think Elie's posts are interesting and thoughtful. On the other hand, the ignorant and vicious comments leave intelligence to be desired.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:19 PM

26=Nervous 1L

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:21 PM

@26...you dear sir are in the minority. And by minority I mean THE ONLY PERSON HERE.

Or you are Fatystal in the blubbery flesh.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:28 PM

27: definitely

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:30 PM

For all intesive purposes chunk change is the same as chump change.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:30 PM

Upon first glance at the title of this post, I swore it would be about firm dissolutions when I saw the two firm names...I have never heard of either of these two places.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:31 PM

My opinion of Elie's posts aside, I think the comments are out of hand and rude. Pull it together folks!

-26

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:35 PM

Dismissive wanking motion @ 26

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:36 PM

Finally a post by Kash. Elie must be out getting more ice cream.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:37 PM

Clearly 30 did that on purpose, but I will take the bait. It is "for all intents and purposes." I can't believe one person could make serious errors in BOTH of his (or her) posts by accident.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:42 PM

Can you quit with the fat jokes/slurs? I mean we are lawyers, not Mike Phelps wannabes. Look around your firm, you see lots of old flabby lawyer ass. The result of years of fine dining and sitting on your ass. Now shut the fuck up, because one day you too will be chunky.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:44 PM

Squire sucks - they will over bill for everything. Attorney who has nothing better to do then sleep at the office and get free dinners.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:45 PM

36 = Elie (or is considering eating him)

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 4:49 PM

Does anyone else agree that ATL comments are positively poisoned by editor bashing?

Why not eliminate the by-lines and let the kids direct their venom to the subject matter of the posts, rather than the editors?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 5:00 PM

36 - here at DPW, we are all beautiful, so please speak for your TTT firm and not mine.

-6'2' chiseled figure hunk lawyer

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 5:11 PM

31 - Start reading The American Lawyer to learn about prominent firms in the legal industry.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 5:19 PM

I don't think that I've ever seen such a slow day at ATL. This is ridonkuleous. If we have to work all day instead of kicking back and watching election coverage, so should the ATL staff!

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 6:22 PM

41, OH SNAP!

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 4, 2008 7:31 PM

agree with 41.

HHR is doing really well right now. they're also the last chance for a lot of 3Ls who were screwed by thielen and heller.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 5, 2008 10:15 AM

ATTENTION READERS: There will be a BOYCOTT of ATL on Friday, November 7th, to protest the declining standards of this blog, particularly in terms of substantive relevance and proofing errors.

Let your voice be heard! Stay away from ATL this Friday!

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 5, 2008 12:46 PM

41 and 44 are pathetic, I feel really bad if after your time at GULC you consider these firms to be prominent. Might be time for a career change.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 5, 2008 3:05 PM

i wouldn't classify ss as prominent, but hhr is a solid firm.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 9:54 AM

#20, why the vitriol toward SSD? What did they do to you? Did you get dinged? If you work for a real NY firm (and I don’t mean one that pretends that it is), then there is no reason to feel threatened. $5.5 mil may not be a lot (particularly when it's a not to exceed GSA contract), but they brought in business during a shitty economy. So far I haven’t heard of any layoffs at SSD, which is more than I can say for some of our white shoed brethren. By the way, if they were hired by Treasury, then they have a single client, the US Treasury, not 2,000 clients. If you’re going to bash them, at least be attentive to the details you moron.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 11:47 PM

48, would you care to comment on today's layoffs?

Post Your Comment