Add RSS RSS

In Pro Se News: Comedy and Tragedy

comedy tragedy.JPGWe’ll start with the funny stuff. It’s been a few months since federal prisoner Jonathan Lee Riches has graced these pages. We welcome the wacky pro se litigant back as he joins the war against World of Warcraft. He’s filed a motion to intervene in video game lawsuit MDY v. Blizzard (WoW’s creator). Virtually Blind has Riches’ motion to intervene, where Riches claims:

World of Warcraft caused Riches [sic] mind to live in a virtual universe, where Riches explored the landscape committing identity theft and fighting cybermonster rival hacker gangs. Riches was addicted to video games and lost touch with reality because of defendants. This caused Riches to commit fraud to buy defendants video games. Riches chose World of Warcraft over working a legit job. Riches mind became a living video game.

Riches has definitely lost touch with reality. He’s filed countless lawsuits, against everyone from Catherine Zeta-Jones to Duke basketball coach Mike Krzyzewski.

Judges are understandably fed up with frivolous and crazy pro se suits like those filed by Riches. Louisiana judge Edward Dufresne grew so sick of them that he stopped reading pro se appeals from convicts. According to the Times-Picayune, he directed court staffer Jerrold Peterson to automatically deny any appeal not filed by an attorney. Dude, due process much?

The sad news: After 13 years of this, Peterson committed suicide, blaming guilt over the 2,500 appeals he denied. In response to Peterson’s suicide note, the Louisiana Supreme Court has asked the Fifth Circuit to step up and review the many appeals.

Third-Party Motion in World of Warcraft Bot Case Accuses Blizzard of… Well… Beats Me [Virtually Blind]
In a suicide note, reflections on guilt [Times-Picayune]


Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:09 AM

firsty firsty

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:11 AM

He could have just quit his job. I'm not opposed to suicide, but there was an easy way out of the guilt here. STOP doing that which makes you feel guilty!

This guy was just depressed, with some guilt on top of it.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:14 AM

THIRD!!!!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:16 AM

He felt guilty about being gay.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:19 AM

Hi everybody!

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:28 AM

Hi Dr. Nick!

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:34 AM

his suit against sarah palin was funnier. :D

https://www.yousendit.com/download/Y2orak93Uzg5NVd4dnc9PQ

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:34 AM

Great post Kash.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:37 AM

Way to go legal profession. Way to protect Due Process from poor judges. Great job profession as a whole.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:39 AM

Gay guilt is the worst guilt.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:43 AM

jonathan lee riches is an american hero, and after his release from prison, he plans to accept an offer to join WILDMAN HARROLD's frivolous lawsuit practice group. a variance in firm policy will allow him to continue to file his complaints using crayons. we are excited.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:48 AM

Texas bar results have been posted on the web.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:54 AM

god damn louisiana sucks!

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 11:56 AM

my job search is turning into a comedy...it's tragic.

-nervous T-10 1K
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 12:00 PM

Why are only half the names of NJ bar passers up (http://www.njbarexams.org/bar1.htm). This makes it very difficult to look up my friends to see if they passed.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 12:01 PM

Why are only half the names of NJ bar passers up (http://www.njbarexams.org/bar1.htm). This makes it very difficult to look up my friends to see if they passed.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 12:03 PM

Must have felt guilty about stealing Mr. Roger's shoes in addition to being gay and going to Tulane.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 12:05 PM

15/16 - check the NJ website again, they're all up.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 12:06 PM

SCOTUS has denied permission to file pro se to those such as Riches. Gotta pay to waste judicial time!

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 12:38 PM

7 - Thanks for that link -- a true Riches classic. My favorite line is "I got Sarah Palin's daughter Bristol pregnant, it was either at Bristol Motor Speedway or while we were watching Juno in Juneau." The man is a literary genius.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 12:48 PM

Thanks be to 7...hilarious...

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 12:56 PM

frivolous lawsuits are such jarvis probes

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 1:57 PM

I read this post thinking it was done by Eli and noted that it was surprisingly quite good... then I noticed Kash wrote it.

Great post, Kash.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 2:49 PM

Perhaps this is petty, but I would suggest Kashmir bone up on the difference between federal and state courts before covering either. According to the article, the Louisiana Supreme Court did not ask the "Fifth Circuit" to step in, at least not as most readers would understand the "Fifth Circuit" to refer to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. That's a federal court, and I think what Kash meant.

What happened here was that Louisiana's Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, a state court, wasn't reviewing petitions. The Louisiana Supreme Court ordered that same state appellate court to do what it was supposed to do in the first place -- review the petitions. No one was "asked to step in." There might have been a story in that, right?

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 7, 2008 2:52 PM

LET'S GO DUKE!

Post Your Comment