Add RSS RSS

City Lawyers Looking to be Citi Lawyers Because Citigroup is Going to Need Them

wall street bull backside.jpgToday, 50,000 Citigroup employees learned that their services would no longer be needed. I spent the weekend at the gun range working on the skills that will matter in the “new economy,” but law firms partners spent the time jockeying for business. Apparently, not everybody has accepted the post-apocalyptic reality staring us all in the face.

But let’s play their game; let’s assume that there will be “money” in the future that can still be traded for goods and services. Which law firms are positioned to pitch in with new Citigroup work?

Because it’s not going to be Wachtell. AmLaw Daily reminds us that Wachtell is representing Wells Fargo in litigation against Citi. And Sullivan & Cromwell is representing the Wachovia side of that Citi-Wachovia-Wells ménage à screwed.

Given today’s news, it’s not surprising that Citi’s board spent most of the weekend trying to pick a top law firm to cover their backside:

Citi’s board is apparently fighting over which Am Law 100 firm free of conflicts it should retain as counsel.

Quoting an anonymous “person close to the situation,” the Times reports that “Citigroup’s board has been bickering over seemingly small issues, including which white-shoe law firm will represent it. …”

The contenders, after the jump.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore looks to be the leader in the clubhouse:

B. Robbins Kiessling, the head of Cravath’s banking practice, was out of the office on Friday and unavailable for comment. A spokeswoman for the firm declined to comment. Like Wachtell, Cravath is a go-to firm for board advisory work, primarily through former presiding partner Robert Joffe.

But going with Cravath would be a little slap in the face to Skadden:

[Skadden partner Eric] Friedman has represented Citi on the $3.7 billion sale of its asset management business to Legg Mason in June 2005 and on Citi’s $11.5 billion divestiture of its Travelers Life & Annuity unit to MetLife in January 2005. In May, Friedman advised Citi on the $900 million sale of CitiStreet to ING Group. (Friedman did not respond to a request for comment by the time of this story.)

Oh, there will be work. You can’t sell assets and free yourself of 50,000 employees without lawyers. Good lawyers. We’ll see who makes bank off this latest financial travesty.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go to my class on how to field dress a wound.

Layoffs Watch ‘08: Citi [Dealbreaker]
Citigroup’s Board Shopping for a Legal Adviser [AmLaw Daily]
Citi Plans Asset Sales and Job Cuts [NYT]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:21 AM

First!!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:23 AM

It's clear they'll be choosing MoFo.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:25 AM

These pretzels taste like ass... CiTTTi

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:25 AM

Shearman does a ton of Citi work.

5 Posted by Glass Cock | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:26 AM

Former Thelen and current Orrick partner Tom Glascock (aka Glass Cock) here, reminding the Citi board that you can't screw over the country without a big glassy cock in the fore.

Choose Orrick and give me credit, then I can finally step out of Weitzel's shadow!

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:27 AM

CORRECTION: Boies, Schiller & Flexner, NOT Sullivan & Cromwell, is representing the Wachovia side of that Citi-Wachovia-Wells ménage à screwed.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:29 AM

It's not going to be Skadden, MysTTTal.....as you pointed out, they're looking for "a top law."

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:29 AM

What about DPW?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:30 AM

Citigroup has announced that it has selected Jackie Chiles.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:34 AM

This is not a good fit for the Ass Cravath. Better to go with CWT or Schulte.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:34 AM

9 - Jackie Chiles is currently representing me in a lawsuit against my former wife, in which I allege she gave me genital warts and a very bad yeast infection.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:36 AM

They should totally get Barry Zuckercorn:

Barry: I got Michael out of his marriage, didn’t I?

Michael: Actually she died.

Barry: You’re kidding me. I’ve been taking credit for that for years.

Michael: Credit?

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:38 AM

SkaddenDC is going to need a top flight law firm to cover its backside and front side in the coming months.

14 Posted by nervous T10 1L | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:40 AM

*wonders if all this citi work will require the talents of one anxious, nervous, and ready to work (and make 3k/week!) 1L*

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:41 AM

MysTTTal fact check your stories.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:42 AM

RMFT!

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:43 AM

skaaaaaden

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:47 AM

Those bull balls are making Mystal hungry.

19 Posted by Glass Cock | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:47 AM

By the way, the picture accompanying this story reminds me of the nightmare I had where I was Elie's prison cellmate and him telling me that he is a power bottom.

Glass Cock, out.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:48 AM

Better yet, CiTTTi should choose Bob Loblaw

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:52 AM

While I haven't been that impressed with Mystal, I have to admit that this post had its moments.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:52 AM

Whose right 6 or Ellie?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:53 AM

When the hell did the commenters become so freakishly gay on this site? I mean a little gay is fine, but everybody knows you never go full balls deep gay. Damn, boy.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:56 AM

Go balls deep or don't go at all.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:57 AM

23 - right on. now time to love that cock.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:58 AM

Hey Citi, here's an idea. You're looking to cut costs? Why not take a look at some of the "second tier" law firms who can perform for you just as well as any of the "AmLaw 100", and who won't charge you obscenely ridiculous rates?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:59 AM

Hey Citi, here's an idea. You're looking to cut costs? Why not take a look at some of the "second tier" law firms who can perform for you just as well as any of the "AmLaw 100", and who won't charge you obscenely ridiculous rates?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:02 AM

Honestly, these posts are getting ridiculous.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:03 AM

Hey Citi, how's it going? You know me, I'm Mark Wahlberg. I see you are fat and bloated, the Elie Mystal of banks if you will. I like that. Say hi to your mother for me.

right meow

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:04 AM

27, that's hilarious! The nervous institutional investors are sure to go for that. You should call Citi HQ ASAP with your fine idea.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:05 AM

28 -- get back to billing your weekend work if these posts are so ridiculous. Douche.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:06 AM

#27 - you are an idiot if you think that is going to happen. basically, at that level, the board has no choice but to spend a boatload of money. all of us that have gone against the likes of cravath and watchell know they are nothing special but they have done an excellent job making themselves appear to be, and that is what investors want. they dont care about good legal advice. they only care if it can cover their butts (i.e. blame someone else).

it is what it is. i actually admire cravath and watchell. they have done an excellent job fooling ignorant people into believing that they know something that the other law firms dont. they should rightfully reap their just rewards. in other words, second tier law firms wont get this sort of business because they have not done proper PR/networking/lobbying to build their brand name. it is their own fault.

go cravath. go get em.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:08 AM

Momma always said beware of dem gays with all of their gay ways and strange crevice filling phalluses.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:10 AM

Tier 2 law firms have been wiping the Ass Cravath for years. Why would anything change now?

UVA2L

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:11 AM

Everything will be fine on january 20th. Obama is gonna tax people making over 200k, so everything will be fine after that. Why is everyone panicking?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:13 AM

Dear Nervous T10 1L:

Did I see you in Carolyn Spencer's office the other day?

Sincerely,
Not-Nervous T10 2L

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:13 AM

And the winner is:

Sagman, Bennet, Robbins, Oppenheim and Taft
Sagman, Bennet, Robbins, Oppenheim and Taft
Sagman, Bennet, Robbins, Oppenheim and Taft
Sagman, Bennet, Robbins, Oppenheim and Taft
Sagman, Bennet, Robbins, Oppenheim and Taft

38 Posted by nervous T10 1L | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:16 AM

36: i did have a meeting with career services but that's all i'll say.

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:18 AM

34 - How would you know? How the fuck does a 2L know about anything in the real legal world? Answer: YOU DON'T. Now stfu you pretentious little shit

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:20 AM

Tier 2 law firms have been wiping the Ass Cravath for years. Why would anything change now?

UVA2L
_________________________

Go back to poppin your collar and attending keg parties dressed in madras, asshole!

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:23 AM

39/40--it's sad when GULCers can't handle the fact that their school sucks. Keep poppin those collars!!

-Not 34

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:28 AM

should go with schulte


avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:29 AM

#32: Right on the money on the first, but not second point.

In this kind of legal work, especially in rather unique deals that are being crafted during the crisis (e.g. how to handle fed's backstop guarantee, a new world of financing (non-)availability etc) economies of scale do matter - the firm that has done a Bear/JPM or ML/BofA deal can facilitate a new transaction much faster (and speed matters a lot here) and more efficiently.

Also, when you made exactly/almost same deals in recent past, you spend less hours on a current deals, and in terms of value for money provided to a client, even if we assume that the clients are fees-sensitive (corporate boards in M&A are not), you get exactly the same, or more, than from the second-tier firm.

Simple equation: Top5-10 firms: higher billing rates x lower hours < or = Tier 2 firms: lower rates x more hours.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:38 AM

@ 43, "what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. "

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:39 AM

UVA >GULC> Cooley>Texas

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:42 AM

I don't know how they overlooked Paul Hastings.

The choice is so clear.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:46 AM

45 -- Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 11:57 AM

It's almost noon and we have one semi-lucid post and two fluff pieces. Thanks Elie! Keep working hard....maybe we can have another post about Obama to round out another morning of mediocrity?

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 12:16 PM

UVA<3 GULCers collective mouths.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 12:23 PM

Elie is working hard at the doughnut shop frantically getting ready for turkey day.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 12:27 PM

Elle, I too have been watching Road Warrior, Zombie movies, and any other apocalypse movies I can find just in case. The new economy will probably be based on some kind of "thunderdome" type wagering system. Good thing I'm a member of the NRA. This is our time to shine, lets show the post-world how cutthroat we lawyers can be!

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 12:45 PM

Boies Schiller is representing Wachovia you retarded idiot. How do you have such trouble doing research on basic facts that could be accomplished in a simple google search?

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 1:16 PM

BSF is doing the litigation now that Citi is suing-mad. S&C did the deal and agreement, and is now advising.

So relax.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 1:27 PM

Amlaw reports that DPW is one of the front-runners.

55 Posted by Elie Mystal | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 1:28 PM

51 -- I think there is an excellent debate to be had (sadly, probably not here) about which post-apocalyptic movie best represents our future society.

I drunkenly re-watched Waterworld after Lehman collapsed and I thought that there were a couple of important themes there (global warming, oil as the most precious resource, drinking your own pee).

But obviously, much like Kevin Costner, all the land won't just disappear, no matter what we do to the environment.

Waterthunderdome Warriors. Something like that is what I'm planning for.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 1:31 PM

What about Paul Weiss?

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 1:50 PM

C'mon lets get serious, clearly UVA is in a completely different league than GULC. Not even debatable.

-GW 1L

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 2:36 PM

39-um, jealous much? maybe you should have studied harder and gone to a better school?

34, if you siphon off all of 39's jealousy from his comment, he does have a point. I've only been out a couple of years and I admit I know nothing about 2nd tier law firms...though I have caught some malpractice-level "oops-es" among other top firm opposing counsel

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 4:12 PM

I'm guessing it goes to Shearman.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 6:06 PM

sure, it'll go to shearman - so long as they forget that little billing issue they had with Shearman a few years ago . . . .

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 8:00 PM

It's gonna go to Shearman.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 8:25 PM

Are these comments REALLY confidential? Can they be traced?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 8:25 PM

Are these comments REALLY confidential? Can they be traced?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 17, 2008 10:20 PM

skadden all the way...!

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Chris Brannigan Law recently expanded its NY practice and would be great.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cV0yzNX7P8

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 10:42 PM

CWT!!!

As a first year at CWT, I can attest to how busy we are in comparison to all you chumps in other firms that have yet to layoff....I hope it feels good to wait to be laid off...we'll be busy for all of '09...BITCHESSS!!!!

hahahahahhahahahahahaahahahaha......

Post Your Comment