Add RSS RSS

McKee Nelson Lays Off 32 (17 Attorneys, 15 Staff)

McKee Nelson Logo.jpgToday’s firm-wide meeting at McKee Nelson did not yield good news. A statement from the firm reveals the extent of the bloodletting:

This morning, McKee Nelson LLP laid off 17 of its corporate/finance associates, reducing this practice from 94 to 77 attorneys. The layoffs are concentrated in the MBS, ABS and CDO parts of our capital markets practice.

Our firm also laid off 15 administrative staff. All of the affected attorneys and staff members are in good standing at the firm. None of these layoffs are performance based.

At least the firm was honest about the reason for the layoffs. No stealth layoff / performance review rhetoric from the firm partners:

For the past 16 months, the partners of this firm have been committed to bearing the costs of the overcapacity in our structured finance group in order to keep our team intact. The devastation that befell the credit markets in September, however, was unprecedented. We have analyzed and created a projection of what we believe the structured finance business will look like over the next two years and what resources, capabilities and experience will be required to do that work. This layoff is a necessary part of the firm’s adjustment to this new reality.

More details after the jump.

A tipster reports some additional information:

[William Nelson] said the firm has absolutely no debt and a $50 million credit line, and he said we are working on starting new practice groups and growing.

Apparently there was just not enough work to support the ABS and CDO practices.

McKee Nelson insists that their financial position is still strong.

Update (2:30 PM): Word on the street is that the affected lawyers are being paid through the end of February (i.e., almost four months) — a generous severance package. They will have access to work email and voice-mail until the end of the year, but they have to collect their belongings from the office — and stop reporting to work — by November 10.

Update / Correction (3:15 PM): This is the official statement from the firm regarding severance. What we reported previously was correct except as to the last day in the office:

Severance package is as follows: Pay and health/dental benefits until the end of February, career counseling, email and voice mail through year end, and departure date by November 14.

The full McKee Nelson press release appears below.

McKEE NELSON — PRESS RELEASE — LAYOFFS

This morning, McKee Nelson LLP laid off 17 of its corporate/finance associates, reducing this practice from 94 to 77 attorneys. The layoffs are concentrated in the MBS, ABS and CDO parts of our capital markets practice.

Our firm also laid off 15 administrative staff. All of the affected attorneys and staff members are in good standing at the firm. None of these layoffs are performance based.

This decision was not made easily, and we are saddened that this layoff is necessary. For the past 16 months, the partners of this firm have been committed to bearing the costs of the overcapacity in our structured finance group in order to keep our team intact. The devastation that befell the credit markets in September, however, was unprecedented. We have analyzed and created a projection of what we believe the structured finance business will look like over the next two years and what resources, capabilities and experience will be required to do that work. This layoff is a necessary part of the firm’s adjustment to this new reality.

McKee Nelson remains financially sound. Our litigation/enforcement and tax practices are thriving and are experiencing strong demand. Our structured products practice, which includes equity and muni derivatives, as well as state and local government finance, is also doing well. These three areas comprise 65 percent of our firm’s lawyers. The firm is debt-free and well-capitalized, with a strong balance sheet. Our real estate fixed expense is far below 10 percent of revenue, which is considered a measure of financial health.

Even after this reduction, McKee Nelson will continue to have one of the largest, most robust and experienced capital markets practices in the country. We are committed to participating actively and constructively in the vital project of reforming and reestablishing healthy, transparent and reliable capital markets.

On behalf of the entire partnership of McKee Nelson, we wish our colleagues well. We are proud to have been associated with them.

— William F. Nelson, Esq. and Reed D. Auerbach, Esq.
Co-Chief Executive Officers
McKee Nelson LLP
New York, NY/Washington DC

Earlier: Mystery Meeting at McKee Nelson

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:15 PM

first - i still use their chapstick

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:16 PM

Good time to be a gov't lawyer, eh?

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:17 PM

Not gonna work there.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:17 PM

these pretzels are making me thirdsty

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:18 PM

Good luck to those let go. These are sad times.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:19 PM

To the Editor: Could you please insert a colon after "32" in the title of this piece?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:19 PM

McKee's chapstick is good, but Linklaters' vanilla-flavored stuff is even better.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:20 PM

linklaters is lined up next

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:20 PM

Once again, can ATL publish a layoff chart listing the known/admitted layoffs by firm for '08? Keeping track of the flood of firings is not easy without one.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:21 PM

Guys at my high school used to put on chapstick all the time. It was no big deal.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:21 PM

To the Editor: Could you please insert a colon after "32" in the title of this piece?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:22 PM

So unfortunate for those affected by the RIF. Hopefully, they will soon land on their feet.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:22 PM

Ouch.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:25 PM

any news on what classes the lawyers came from?

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:25 PM

seems like McKee did it in about as classy a way as you could do it...

sucks though...

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:26 PM

To poster #7/11: Could you please insert a 32" piece of salami into your colon? TYIA

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:26 PM

@9...Elie not know how make charts...only cut and paste WSJ articles.

YOU PIECE OF SHIT MYSTAL! You have ruined this site...and don't let the web traffic fool you that has to do with the blood letting and dissolution...but you are a scummy scrub.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:27 PM

oh great... first McKee, next up SkaTTTen DC. we are fucked

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:28 PM

What does MYSTAL stand for ?

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:32 PM

Here is some information that is not in the WSJ Law Blog post:

"Update (2:30 PM): Word on the street is that the affected lawyers are being paid through the end of February (i.e., almost four months) -- a generous severance package. They will have access to work email and voice-mail until the end of the year, but they have to collect their belongings from the office -- and stop reporting to work -- by November 10 (a week from today)."

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:35 PM

Can someone please explain with MYSTAL stands for?

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:35 PM

New Jersey bar results are out:

http://www.njbarexams.org/Result/all.htm

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:35 PM

well...my career services meeting was discouraging. they basically told us not to expect 1L firm jobs. not only did the career services dean tell us this once, but on five separate occasions.

*starts drinking to wash away my jobless sorrows*

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com (i need them now more than ever)

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:39 PM

Hey nervous t-10 1L -- Please, for the good of your family and the world in general, please contract aids, catch a cold, and die.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:40 PM

ATL should do a stealth layoff of everyone named MysTTTal.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:43 PM

This site has needed someone like T-10 1L ever since L2L quit posting. Imagine the misery when those Spring OCI rejections start rolling in.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:44 PM

Were all the layoffs in their NY office?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:46 PM

Sounds like the only growth areas are structured texting and unsecured IMing.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:47 PM

$10,000 and a weekend with Kash in the Catskills retreat of your choice to the first person to bring me T-10 1L's mouthbreather head on a stick.

CLS3L

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:49 PM

Confidential to Nervous T-10 1L:

Quit wallowing in self-pity that you won't make $3000/week. Do what truly motivated people do and bust your butt to get any job with legal experience, paid or unpaid. That is what 1L summer is for -- trying to figure out what kind of law you want to practice, starting at the bottom of the ladder, and working for no money in order to get experience that will later on assist you in getting a paid job. Jesus Christ what is with the youth these days?

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:51 PM

Grammar nazis are uncool.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:53 PM

8- why would linklaters be lined up next??

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:54 PM

The real news came out last night, when the BCS rankings confirmed that THE TIDE IS #1

RTR, Roll Saban.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:56 PM

Good luck to everyone affected. As a fellow big-law layoff victim a few months ago, I can confirm that it's really hard out there (especially for those with mortgage-backed securities experience!). You might have to do something that isn't your "dream job" for a few years while you wait for things to pick up again. It sucks, but that's the deal at the moment.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:57 PM

*currently working on Civ_Pro_Outline_Volume_33.doc while others hate on me on abovethelaw.com*

-Nervous T-10 1L

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 2:59 PM

If Alabama were a state it would be Texas. Fat, stupid, and completely devoid of class and hygiene.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:00 PM

We don't care you TTT-110 #1Loser

34. Try the feds. Decent hours, benefits, and lots of job security.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:00 PM

30: what if i took 30k from your paycheck right now? because that's what i feel like after going to that meeting. obviously i can work hard at some non-profit or judge's chambers 1L summer but i would much rather work hard for 3k/week at a firm, who wouldn't? spare me your anger just because i want to get paid this summer.

*goes back to drinking*

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:00 PM

34 -

If the implication is that MBS was a "dream job," then I would love to meet you in person. Maybe, say, over a friendly game of Dungeons and Dragons?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:01 PM

34 -

If the implication is that MBS was a "dream job," then I would love to meet you in person. Maybe, say, over a friendly game of Dungeons and Dragons?

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:02 PM

What is the hippest neighborhood in NYC to get a sublet for the summer?

-2L with summer associate gig lined up.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:03 PM

21 - read the byline and then pat yourself on the back for your powers of observation.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:03 PM

2L-

Harlem. Seriously.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:04 PM

i'm nervous that everyone on ATL hates me

*goes back to drinking*

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:06 PM

Has everybody heard that the bird is the word?

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:07 PM

30 just got TOLD by nervous t10 1L!

*snaps fingers*

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:08 PM

Everyone's heard about the bird.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:09 PM

Thanks for the email nervous T-10 1L; I hope that you will not mind that some Nigerian associates of mine will contact you with some business opportunities?

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:09 PM

This firm clearly had someone with a brain managing the news release, unlike just about every other firm to date. Kudos on calling a spade a spade, controllilng the story well, and not bullshitting everyone into thinking it was performance based.

Best of luck to those impacted.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:10 PM

i'm nervous that everyone on ATL hates me

*goes back to drinking*

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:10 PM

we gotta know what classes these people come from. if they're first or second years, that's really shitty. if they're older, they'll have (or should have) the skills necessary to go somewhere else and hit the ground running. regardless, good luck. this is a real hurricane we're in now, and it isn't letting up.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:10 PM

41-
Canarsie. Enjoy your summer.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:10 PM

41 - Hoboken. The PATH train is the the party train.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:11 PM

Nervous -- the point is that there will not be any 1L jobs this summer for you to have. I'm sorry. In order to set yourself up for 2L OCI, you have to be willing to sacrifice a little money for future success. Did your law school promise you loads of cash this summer? Did your career services promise you a 1L job? I doubt it.

I actually feel sympathetic to you to a certain extent -- but when hardworking lawyers are being laid off left and right, your sniveling about how you might not make 30k this summer is just completely devoid of perspective.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:15 PM

21 - Food, beer, and not proof reading.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:15 PM

If Queens is good enough for Prince Akeem of Zamunda, it is good enough for a 2L.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:18 PM

"McKee Nelson remains financially sound."

You can't say that with a straight face.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:22 PM

As a follow up to #34, in all seriousness, are those who have been laid off looking at government work? Public interest? Switching cities? I too have seen that there isn't much out there in the securitization/capital markets/general corporate area. Also, switching to another group does not look very promising either.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:24 PM

Any information re: 2008 bonuses? Can ATL make some calls? This would be helpful information.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:30 PM

59 and 60---Your bonus is that you are still employed.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:30 PM

Isn't stealth lay-off better for the affected associate seeking a job at another firm? What's better for an associate--applying for a job at another firm when everyone knows that the associate's firm laid off or is laying off a bunch of associates or applying for a job at another firm when the "word" of the lay-offs has not yet hit the streets? Isn't it better appearing as if one is seeking a lateral move rather than as if one is desperate because one is out of (or about to be out of) a job? Just curious.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:32 PM

i'm nervous that everyone on ATL hates me

*goes back to drinking*

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:36 PM

I hear Kirkland & Ellis has had several stealth layoffs in their NY and Chi offices both. Can anyone confirm?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:39 PM

61,

A "stealth" layoff means the firm has fired an associate ostensibly for performance reasons, but the true reason was economic. In terms of finding a new job, I think most associates would rather tell prospective employers they were let go because the old firm had economic problems, not because they sucked and couldn’t cut it.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:48 PM

I love ATL because I get to hear about all these firms I've never heard of before. "McKee Nelson," "Locke Lord," etc.... it's like watching a movie with a made up law firm.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:50 PM

I'm not aware of stealth layoffs, but I know there were a few performance-related ones. I don't think this is any different from any other year.

K&E Assoc.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 3:51 PM

66, there were more than a few.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:00 PM

39 - i totally hate you. you stole my joke.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:03 PM

3:39 is right. When you are the victim of a stealth layoff, your departure is papered with a negative performance review.

When you interview as a lateral, you will be asked about how your performance reviews were. You could try lying about it and saying they were great.

But that is dangerous, especially if you get asked for references. It is better to be the victim of a layoff that even the firm admits is economic.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:03 PM

A cold, frosty beer for #56 for making me laugh.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:07 PM

So were these "corporate" and "finance" attorneys or really "structured finance" attorneys?

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:10 PM

No first years were laid off, but I think one or two second years might have been axed. I also think most of the cuts were in NYC.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:13 PM

66,72 -- you must work in K&E's public relations dept, -- there were way more than "one or two"

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:24 PM

I haven't heard of anyone being asked to leave K&E NY for any reason other than they really suck and can't cut it here. If you're good and your dept happens to be slow, they'll keep you around.

K&E NY partner

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:25 PM

E-lee,

please do a post on K&E's stealth layoffs. investigate.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:26 PM

I think "nervous T-10 1L" is just "trying to create a gimmick" so he can "become known on ATL" and use that cheap fame to "compensate for bad grades." I shall henceforth ignore his/her existence/stench.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:29 PM

74 - YOU really suck

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:31 PM

51 has it bass ackwards. 1st or 2nd years will go to a lesser firm within the severance period. They will take a prestige hit and maybe a pay hit. They will be fine. Fifth and sixth years with nothing but MBS on their resume are screwed big time. One might think that someone with five years of negotiating complex agreements and such would be valuable, esp if willing to take a class year hit. But I know a bunch of these people and, believe you me, most of the midlevels being let go are going to be doing contract work. Five years of MBS is resume poison. Trust me.

But McKee is at least being honest. Give them that.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:32 PM

Mature, 77.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:40 PM

i'm nervous that locke lord won't be around next year to hire me

*goes back to drinking*

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:43 PM

King and Spalding ATL defections to Nixon Peapody. I think the Atlanta office is a sinking ship.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:45 PM

Mayer Brown is next with the layoffs!

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:49 PM

Props to McKee Nelson: 4 month severance and no claim layoffs were performance based. I hope every firm starts to handle things this well.

My heart goes out to the associates though - hopefully they will find something quickly.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:49 PM

Are these lay-offs really not performance-based? You would think that when someone has to go, they would cut the dead weight first. I'd be interested to know whether the people laid off were underperformers, or whether there were some real surprises in the attorneys let go.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:52 PM

Mayer Brown is a toilet.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 4:53 PM

I generally agree with you 84. Or had always thought that until now. I think times are so bad that even if you have a "star" in MBS, you can't move him to another corporate group because THERE IS NO WORK right now.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 5:02 PM

consolidated layoffs list:

http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202425647706

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 5:22 PM

Wow! I thought Kirkland was supposed to be one of Chicago's best firms. Are stealth layoffs confirmed?

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 5:23 PM

Mayer Brown is headed for destruction

http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202425640058

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 5:49 PM

What I don't get is even if these layoffs are not performance based, how does a firm pick the people to let go. Does it start with least hours? People who no partner can vouch for because they haven't forged any solid relationships, i.e. not good at networking? Last in first out in terms of laterals, etc.? Random? I understand that people aren't given the spiel about how their work product has worsened in the past 6 months (which happens to coincide with the general slowdown) but there has to be some criteria and I would assume performance is in some way involved.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 5:58 PM

88- I am in Kirkland Chicago and have not heard of any, and am pretty sure that there have not been any in my department.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 6:00 PM

Given the portion of Mckee Nelson's business that is no more, shouldn't the entire firm just fold sooner or later?

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 6:12 PM

90:

Some firms engaged in stealth layoffs are actually getting rid of associates who have sufficient hours for year end performance bonus payment. They are shit canning them so they don't have to pay the bonus and "giving" the work they were doing to non-equity partners who have no work. Some firms actually have told certain associates who have not been fired yet to stop billing so that they don't reach bonus hours this bonus period.

Low class, but reality.

And yes, some very good lawyers are being canned because they have been doing the work that less diligent non-equity partners have not been doing. Theses associates have been hustling the hours from the few partners with work. Now these non-equity partners have reached the point that they will actually work if it means "saving" all of the salary and bonuses of the associates that have been shit-canned.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 7:30 PM

amlaw 200 layoff list

http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202425647706

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 9:33 PM

90, actually I think the last in, first out regarding laterals is the opposite - the firms that picked up lateral associates over the past year picked them based on need/practice area growth and the lateral's past performance. I would think a firm would be more likely to get rid of a poor performer who had been there since the summer program over a lateral they hired to fill a specific need and who had a good record.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 10:09 PM

93 - Really!! Firms are essentially sabotaging attempts at making minimum billables? And firing associates with high billables? wow. Care to drop names? Thanks.

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 3, 2008 11:25 PM

Elie,

How about a discussion of practice areas that are still doing ok.

Thanks.

Post Your Comment