Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Layoff Watch: 30 Out At Squire Sanders

squire snaders staff attorney offers.gifMore bad news today, this time from Squire Sanders.

Multiple sources reported massive layoffs at Squire Sanders yesterday. The firm has confirmed that 30 associates and paralegals were let go:

We have completed annual reviews of all of our associates and, as a result of that process and with regret have advised some of our associates that they should explore career opportunities elsewhere and we are giving them time to do so. About 30 associates and paralegals will be affected firmwide,including three associates in Phoenix. This is a higher number than usual leaving following performance reviews. Admittedly, current and projected business conditions influenced the timing of these decisions. Like all firms, we are forced to align our resource capabilities with project client service levels and make some hard personnel decisions. That may sound harsh to some and sound like a ‘lay off’ to others but we are working closely with all professionals affected and providing support and assistance.

The Phoenix news is significant. Markets like Phoenix (and Tampa, another Squire branch location) are hurting (because of the housing market) but have not yet felt the brunt of Biglaw layoffs.

We understand that the targets of the cuts were more expensive senior associates. We don’t have any word on what severance package Squire Sanders is offering.

From the firm’s statement, it looks like another case of “forced attrition.”

After the jump, we look into the recent past of Squire Sanders.

Most firms are laying people off because of the market collapse. But Squire Sanders is laying people off despite the economic crisis. Earlier this month, we mentioned that Squire was getting much Federal Bailout love:

Well, Reuters reports that Hughes Hubbard and Squire Sanders are going to get mad bailout love, in the form of $11 million:

“Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP and Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLP have each been awarded a contract for roughly $5.5 million to help shepherd about 2,000 financial firms through the program that would see the government buy company shares, the Treasury Department said on Monday.”

If a $5.5 million contract can’t save anybody’s job, things must be getting pretty bad out there.

Perhaps Squire is trying to trim down to become a more attractive merger target? A few months ago we heard the rumor that Seyfarth Shaw was considering a merger with Squire Sanders:

The scuttlebutt is that the firm is in “serious” merger talks with another firm of roughly equal size. Upon information and belief, that firm is Squire Sanders.

Both firms hover around the 800-attorney mark. The product of their merger — nicknamed “S4” by one tipster, standing for either “Seyfarth Shaw Squire Sanders” or “Squire Sanders Seyfarth Shaw” — would be a 1600-lawyer behemoth. The combination would give Seyfarth a coveted foothold in Bratislava.

Next on ATL, the unedited version of Apocalypse Now.

Earlier: Hughes Hubbard and Squire Sanders will get the big bailout bucks
Law Firm Merger Mania: Seyfarth Shaw + Squire Sanders?

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:37 PM

FIRST

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:39 PM

SECOND! HOLY SH*T!

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:40 PM

THIRDSTY!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:41 PM

What about Mayer Brown you phat phuck?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:42 PM

Let us not forget how they no-offered 30% of their 2Ls as well; as anyone who worked at the firm this summer knows, that number is somewhat inflated as well.

Nice people at SSD, it sucks for them.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:42 PM

Keep posting about layoffs in third-tier markets, and just totally ignore the MASSIVE LAYOFFS AT MAYER BROWN. Keep it up.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:42 PM

This would never happen in Texas.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:44 PM

What offices other than Phoenix?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:44 PM

Which offices other than Phoenix?

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:44 PM

You first, second and thirders are FUCKING irritating.

That sai, this might be the funniest thing I've heard all day: "We have completed annual reviews of all of our associates and, as a result of that process and with regret have advised some of our associates that they should explore career opportunities elsewhere and we are giving them time to do so. "

Seriously?? "Explore career opportunities elsewhere"?? Like...McD's?

Not to mention: "We're giving them the time to do so."

I get that lawyers are mealy-mouthed bastards, but STILL!

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:45 PM

"The combination would give Seyfarth a coveted foothold in Bratislava."

Slovakia is awesome for a few reasons, but I had no idea it was a "coveted" legal market.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:46 PM

I've heard that there were lay-offs today at Mayer Brown, Fried Frank, and Sidley.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:48 PM

I've heard that there were lay-offs today at Mayer Brown, Fried Frank, and Sidley.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:48 PM

Mayer Brown? Mayer Brown? Mayer fuckin Brown.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:49 PM

Why would a Mayor lay off his staff?

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:51 PM

Mayer Brown! How can 20 people be able to comment on the layoffs there and yet abovethelaw is clueless?

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:51 PM

BREAKING N00Z OMG: SIDLEY LAID OFF AUSTIN. MORE LAYOFFS TO FOLLOW.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:51 PM

BREAKING N00Z OMG: SIDLEY LAID OFF AUSTIN. MORE LAYOFFS TO FOLLOW.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:54 PM

11 - sarcasm, look it up.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:54 PM

For Mayer Brown, look at yesterday's post:

http://abovethelaw.com/2008/11/nationwide_layoff_watch_specul.php

There are some very interesting comments on that post too.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:54 PM

sidley laid off the city of austin. how many people live there. jeez. that's crazy.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:54 PM

MB laid off everyone with a last name starting with the letters A-M.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:55 PM

Does couching these as "performance-based" lessen the firm's obligation under the WARN act or whatever other obligations might attach to "lay-offs"?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:55 PM

There's a restaurant named Squire Rockwell's near my house. Is this a sister chain or something?

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:56 PM

ATL blows donkey balls - where the fuck is a goddamn post on the Mayer Brown layoffs???

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:58 PM

How much time are these people getting before the firm officially fires them or lays them off?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:59 PM

How about the S&P. Holy crap.

I'm glad I have a job (for now). But things aren't looking pretty around here...

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:00 PM

Chill out about Mayer Brown.

If they are going to lay people off, I am sure they will wait until Friday.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:02 PM

To all the douches posting about alleged MB layoffs, perhaps you could share an insider e-mail or firm press release? B/c if not, you're just repeating rumor. And while ATL is not exactly the NYT, it does no good to "report" on unadulterated speculation. And no, this is not Elie. Or Lat.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:09 PM

29 - I have already sent an email to Elie but the fatso is yet to respond. Stop eating and get to work mysTTTal.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:09 PM

To all the douches posting about alleged MB layoffs, perhaps you could share an insider e-mail or firm press release? B/c if not, you're just repeating rumor. And while ATL is not exactly the NYT, it does no good to "report" on unadulterated speculation. And no, this is not Elie. Or Lat.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:10 PM

hey 29 -- pull your head out of your ass! Shit is going down/has gone down at MB! There likely won't be a memo until it's all over.

I talked to buddy there and he said 3 associates in charlotte and a couple of staff. Now as the firm in the aggregate, that will be interesting.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:14 PM

Question regarding choosing a firm for the summer. Would it better to work at a law firm that is less leveraged based out of Houston such as Vinson & Elkins. From the comments I have read they seem to be fairly healthy.

Other options are places like White & Case, Debevoise & Plimpton, Cleary, Baker Botts, etc. I am strongly leaning towards V&E. Also, in this market do people think it is a bad idea to split between two different firms?

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:15 PM

I believe there was a meeting at Cooley Godward the other day re "keeping all options open", including layoffs, in the next month or so.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:16 PM

If Elie were a man he'd transfer the 'Petition to Fire Elie' from the community section and turn it into a real post. Or maybe even a poll. And there would probably have to be pictures of kittens.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:16 PM

At least it was a good day on Wall Street....

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:18 PM


Are those laid off getting 5.5 months plus health, like Orrick, or three months, like W&C, or less?

38 Posted by Elie Mystal | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:18 PM

30 is lying.

Anyway. We've got good leads. We're following those leads. Nothing is f^@&*^d here dude.
--Elie

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:19 PM

Question regarding choosing a firm for the summer. Would it better to work at a law firm that is less leveraged based out of Houston such as Vinson & Elkins. From the comments I have read they seem to be fairly healthy.

Other options are places like White & Case, Debevoise & Plimpton, Cleary, Baker Botts, etc. I am strongly leaning towards V&E. Also, in this market do people think it is a bad idea to split between two different firms?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:19 PM

Question regarding choosing a firm for the summer. Would it better to work at a law firm that is less leveraged based out of Houston such as Vinson & Elkins. From the comments I have read they seem to be fairly healthy.

Other options are places like White & Case, Debevoise & Plimpton, Cleary, Baker Botts, etc. I am strongly leaning towards V&E. Also, in this market do people think it is a bad idea to split between two different firms?

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:21 PM

any news on fried frank??

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:24 PM

any news on fried frank??

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:24 PM

34, any info re firm-wide, specific offices, etc.?

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:24 PM

Nothing is f^@&*^d? The G@#!*n plane has crashed into the mountain!

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:26 PM

40 - I'm in biglaw in NYC. Thinking of going to TX. I'd go to V&E, personally.

And I would still try to split my summer.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:26 PM

I had a fried frank at the airport on the way back from a depo yesterday. It was no big deal.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:27 PM

**This is my first ever post***

I think all this lay off stuff is so funny. Y'all go on about how HLS is better than SLS which is better than... Y'all go on about T-10 and V-10 and VE and KE and 190 or 160 (or whatever the in acronyms are).

I really don't get it. Most of you (not all) are so wrapped up in your own self importance and where you went to school and where you work you think stuff like this will never happen to you. What happened to a little bit of humility? If this board is a representation of how you approach your employment I have no sympathy at all. (Flame away)

Obviously anonymity makes your balls bigger.

A Non-US trained lawyer with no student loans (can you say socialist) who took one of your jobs.

**That was my last ever post**

Peace out!

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:28 PM

I hear MOFO is planning something big.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:28 PM

Really Elie?? You feel the need to respond to juvenile taunting? Take the high road, be the bigger ma...oh, oops, sorry.

Anyway, don't let the cretins get to you, or do, go Columbine on their asses and get out of this job. Either way, posts like 38 are f-ing stupid.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:30 PM

49 - Any post containing a Lebowski quote cannot, under any possible circumstances, be considered "f-ing stupid."

Sincerely,
Karl Hungus

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:30 PM

@40: I don't care what people say here about "TTT" and all that bullshit, all the firms on your list are good. If you go to Texas, take V&E over Baker--they might be the firm that outdoes everyone after this whole mess. And no, I don't work there or even in Texas. As for the others, they're all good. Once you actually start as an attorney, they'll all be fine. I think W&C and Cleary are particularly good firms.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:31 PM

47 - You talk about humility. Try practicing what you preach hypocrite

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:32 PM

40 - I'm in biglaw in NYC. Thinking of going to TX. I'd go to V&E, personally.

And I would still try to split my summer.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:33 PM

How has Milbank -- which is a FINANCE firm -- not announced layoffs yet?

They have to be laying people off in this market, and yet there is no word....


avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:36 PM

49, I dunno, I actually kind of like it when Elie takes a stand. He is nominally in charge of this place; why shouldn't he fill us in on whether some anonymous douchebag spreading rumors is blatantly lying? The guy was insisting that he gave good info to Elie and now we know that he didn't.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:37 PM

29: MB PR person.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:38 PM

50: That would only be true if he had quoted a good movie. Hell, even a decent movie would have been fine with me rather than a useless waste of time.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:39 PM

What a bunch of pricks. These firms can't wait until after the holidays to do this?

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:39 PM

Wasn't Squire supposed to merge with Seyfarth?

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:40 PM

57 = Bitter Republican

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:43 PM

Fried Frank laid off around 15-20 real estate associates in DC today; good people. This economy sucks.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:43 PM

Question regarding choosing a firm for the summer. Would it better to work at a law firm that is less leveraged based out of Houston such as Vinson & Elkins. From the comments I have read they seem to be fairly healthy.

Other options are places like White & Case, Debevoise & Plimpton, Cleary, Baker Botts, etc. I am strongly leaning towards V&E. Also, in this market do people think it is a bad idea to split between two different firms?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:43 PM

Question regarding choosing a firm for the summer. Would it better to work at a law firm that is less leveraged based out of Houston such as Vinson & Elkins. From the comments I have read they seem to be fairly healthy.

Other options are places like White & Case, Debevoise & Plimpton, Cleary, Baker Botts, etc. I am strongly leaning towards V&E. Also, in this market do people think it is a bad idea to split between two different firms?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:44 PM

58: Um, no. They can't. It's all about the year-end numbers and keeping the carnage from seeping into 2009.

I'm not a tax attorney, but I would venture that there are probably tax issues/benefits with the year-end coming up. I know my firm is desperately trying to come up with write-offs. (New computer anyone??)

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:46 PM

47,

We thank the Good Lord that it was your Last Post!

ATL Community

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:46 PM

58, waiting until after the holidays would cut into partner comp...duh.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:46 PM

45 and 51, thanks a lot for your input. I am really leaning towards V&E. They seem like a great firm (as are all the others I mentioned) and while it's hard to predict (especially as a law student who doesn't know much about the legal industry as whole) which firms are well positioned. However, from all of my research it seems V&E might be a little better positioned than other firms.

Anyways, thanks again for your honest answers.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:46 PM

58 -- they don't have to pay bonuses this way.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:46 PM

Milbank has moved some people along & out.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:47 PM

Do we 55? I trust Elie about as far as I can throw the fat fu#*!

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:48 PM

Come on 49, you're being very undude. Let Elie respond in the comments if he wishes to.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:50 PM

60: Wow. No, not at all. I believe gay men and women should have the right to marry and have agreed to act as incubator for one of my best friends should that happy day ever come to pass for him.

I voted for Obama, ragged on Palin, laughed at McCain and wish they'd ridden Lieberman out on a rail.

Further, I live in a hippie enclave where everyone thinks I'm the "square" but it's ok because I'm more liberal than they are.

I just didn't like the movie.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:51 PM

57: Please leave.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:52 PM

Elie, this is what happens when you feed the anti-MB trolls who have, for some reason, chosen to infest this board. You went out on a limb to try to get something more concrete, referred to those comments as the "word on the street," and now all these d-bags have been encouraged and will derail the next twenty-thirty comment threads. Good job!

You don't have any "good leads," do you?

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:54 PM

Mystal's avatar is kinda creepy.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:56 PM

72 - you are just an idiot then

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:56 PM

Geez...looks like Citi is going under now too...when will it ever stop. I can't take the anticipation anymore! I bet tomorrow is going to be a pretty dark day across all the financial/legal world. Buckle up kids.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:57 PM

72: First lib ever who didn't like the movie. Perhaps you should re-watch.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:58 PM

76: Yes, because taste in movies is a precise and exacting IQ test.

Please.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:01 PM

Mayer McCheese

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:06 PM

"Markets like Phoenix (and Tampa, another Squire branch location) are hurting (because of the housing market) but have not yet felt the brunt of Biglaw layoffs. "

Layoffs have hit Orlando also. At least two real estate associates and one real estate staff attorney were laid off earlier this year from Baker Hostetler.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:07 PM

there were definitely layoffs today in Fried Frank's real estate department.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:07 PM

I was fired from Mayer Brown today.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:08 PM

THE GODDAMN PLANE HAS CRASHED INTO THE MOUNTAIN!

Also, MysTTTal.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:12 PM

In response to 61, Fried Frank DC has 2 real estate associates, both of whom are still working at the firm.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:17 PM

33/67 (and your multiple other incarnations):
Fellow 2L here. I chose V&E (non-Houston office) for Summer 2009 over several New York-based firms. My decision was in part based on the idea that an energy-focused firm would be relatively well-positioned. I question whether that will continue to be the case as the price of oil drops precipitously. But nevertheless, I sought advice from family friends who are biglaw partners, and they agreed with my rationale. All of that being said, what really sealed the deal for me was that both the partners and associates I've interacted with at V&E have been incredibly friendly, socially normal, actually seem to be very happy with their firm. Before people jump down my throat for buying into this, let me say that as someone who recruited during September and October of this year, I came across many people at many firms who were frankly scared shitless. V&E was the exception. I accepted their offer and am hoping for the best.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:21 PM

Whoever posted about Fried Frank laying people off is a big liar. They have not laid anyone off, and they don't plan to.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:21 PM

33-
Are you a 1L talking about choosing a firm for NEXT summer? It's unconscionable that you would be a 2L and still making this decision on Nov. 20...

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:30 PM

86, thanks glad to hear it. I am making up my mind tonight but will probably accept V&E tomorrow. Pretty happy about my decisions. Seems like a great place.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:31 PM

86: The V&E DC office is full of pricks. But the office itself is tres upscale. And will have a great view of the inauguration parade.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:38 PM

89, for the love of God tell me that you are not a 2L still holding an offer open.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:40 PM

90: I'm sure the view of the inauguration parade would be wonderful. An SA will not get to see that view because there is no inauguration in the summer. And I happen to like the people at V&E DC.

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:46 PM

To #48:
"I hear MOFO is planning something big."

Please share details.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:46 PM

57 - if you think Lebowski is a bad film, you are not the kind of person a client should be giving any matters to. You simply have no taste, no talent, no ability to discern quality when you see it. As another said, please leave.

- The dude, abiding.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:50 PM

To #48:
"I hear MOFO is planning something big."

Please share details.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 6:15 PM

holy crap! even non-legal firms like this are doing layoffs???

(what business is this squianders entity in by the way? finance?)

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:06 PM

Some people's taste is just better than yours, 94. You like American beer, sports, and stupid entertainment movies. I like imported stouts, literature, and classic cinema. So it goes.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:22 PM

Time to rethink my career choice.

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:22 PM

Time to rethink my career choice.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:22 PM

Time to rethink my career choice.

avatar
101 Posted by Ellen Barshevsky | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:03 PM

Has ANYONE researched to know if Scquire Sandars is a REAL firm, I do not think it is real. This is propoganda and no one at MY firm is being layoffed. WHO makes $5.5 million dollars a YEAR? No one. Lets be REALISTIC about this. My managing partner insures that Indians will NOT take my job. I can ALWAYS be a famous Blawgger anyways.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:48 PM

anybody hear if Miami was included in the layovers, i was interviewed by a real douchebag associate during OCI, Im hoping he got fired...

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:21 PM

How many attorneys, if any, were laid off in the Tampa office?

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:36 PM

layed, not laid.

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 20, 2008 10:53 PM

Squire Sanders is run by some real characters. They couldn't send out an email where they acknowledge the lay-off. Believe me, if they fess up to 30, the real number of folks who were given bogus reviews and asked to leave is a higher number.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 2:18 AM

I think the number is closer to 50 laid off. I guarantee that the vast majority laid off were not performance-related.

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 2:18 AM

I think the number is closer to 50 laid off. I guarantee that the vast majority laid off were not performance-related.

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 8:53 AM

The use of "performance reviews" is about the most cowardly, idiotic display I can imagine.

These geniuses expect the market to believe that all of a sudden, in one 12 mo. period, the number of poorly performing attorneys rockets up 100000% at these firms?

Anyone with half a f-ing brain clearly understands this crap to mean:

A. We're too cowardly to admit that we're in the crapper (i.e., our partners - not associates - failed to position the firm to whether the storm), so we're going to slander the performance of competent attorneys in a thin attempt at hiding our failures as a business entity, or

B. We've carried deadweight for years and billed out clients for it the entire time, and now we can't justify billing our clients for ineffective counsel.

Either way, you're left looking like a f-ing liar and a douchebag.

If you can just come out - McKee Nelson style - and say its a tough economy and we had to make cuts, but it's not the fault of our associates, then I think clients need to take a hard look at why they're doing business with these firms.

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 10:44 AM

A bit difficult to shed tears for these big firms cutting staff and reducing bonuses. As an in-house lawyer I get to see the $500-$800/hr. fees these firms charge and I know my salary is lower than many 5th year attorneys even though I've been practicing for 20+ years. Maybe greed isn't good after all.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 10:48 AM

A bit difficult to shed tears for these big firms cutting staff and reducing bonuses. As an in-house lawyer I get to see the $500-$800/hr. fees these firms charge and I know my salary is lower than many 5th year attorneys even though I've been practicing for 20+ years. Maybe greed isn't good after all.

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 11:55 AM

Interesting perspective 109, but I don’t get the sour grapes. You made the choice. If you had what it takes to work at a premier firm, and put up with 2,500+ billable hours and ridiculous client time constraints, you too would be earning more. As it is, you opted to go in house. Billing rates reflect market forces. If a client does not see value in the services it receives at the rate charged, the client finds another firm. The fact that your company continues to retain lawyers charging $500 to $800 per hour means those lawyers continue to deliver value. Being compensated for delivering value is not greedy.

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 12:41 PM

Squire Sanders is so small time so it will probably not happen but folks should really call them out on this. Look at the wording of their press release - it is particularly cowardly. What is this BS about "some may call this a layoff..." What are they saying? It's kind of a layoff but really, these folks couldn't cut it?? Why don't they just admit that it was not for performance reasons so that these folks aren't tainted as much in their job search. What assholes.

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 21, 2008 2:24 PM

Any news on any layoff for their san francisco office? I hope some of the more "senior" associates over there got fired! They suck!

Plus, who gives their holiday party in Feb?? And they always choose such terrible places. I wonder how much bonuses will be there this year?

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:35 AM

Squire is the cheapest law firm. Yeah, the "holiday" party in February is pretty funny. But the inferiority complex they have over there is really the most pathetic part.

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 11:56 AM

One of the female senior associate - before trial had posted pictures of opposing counsel on her wall and threw darts at them, - classy isn't it? They really do have inferiority complex there, they hate any one who went to ivy league school because they all went to Hasting (Not diss-ing Hasting btw)

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, November 24, 2008 12:00 PM

One of the female senior associate - before trial had posted pictures of opposing counsel on her wall and threw darts at them, - classy isn't it? They really do have inferiority complex there, they hate any one who went to ivy league school because they all went to Hasting (Not diss-ing Hasting btw)

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:44 AM

3 attys and one paralegal are out in Tampa. Not sure about Miami--but they need to clean house down there

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 2:59 PM

117,

That's a lot of people for such a small office. Were all the associates senior associates?

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 7:02 AM

This is likely targeted associate reviews normally take place in Jan/Feb at SSD. SSD moved up the reviews to Sept/Oct - seems fishy to me. I heard folks are getting 12 weeks to transition out and many of the associates targeted were the more expensive ones (i.e. mid-senior)

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, November 28, 2008 9:28 AM

SSD has been conducting stealth layoffs for some time, and this just confirms that the firm is going down the crapper.

Post Your Comment