Add RSS RSS

Racist Breathalyzer?

Breathalyzer.JPGAccording to Connecticut DUI lawyer James O. Ruane, I can’t breathe as well as white people. Based on this “analysis” Ruane has determined that the breathalyzer is a racist device.

Really. I’m not making that up. Ruane represents a black man who got busted for drunk driving:

A breath analysis administered at state police Troop G in Bridgeport found Brown had a blood-alcohol content of 0.188. The legal limit is 0.08.

In a motion filed Tuesday in Superior Court, Ruane asked a judge to suppress his client’s breathalyzer test results, contending the device used by the state police, and most other local police departments, the Intoxilyzer 5000, discriminates against blacks. Brown is an African-American.

I’m all for zealous defense of your clients, but I don’t see why you have to insult thinking people of all colors to make that defense. But Ruane argued:

[T]he lung capacity of a black man is 3 percent smaller than a white man and, therefore, black men’s test results vary from the sobriety standard set by the device.

He said Dr. Michael Hlastala, a lung physiologist at the University of Washington, examined research of other lung physiologists and, based on his studies, has determined the Intoxilyzer 5000 does not effectively test the blood-alcohol content of black men.

“He looked at all the research and came up with the bigger picture and found the common thread,” he said.

Mmm … blanket generalizations about an entire people. I wonder what Michael Jordan’s lung capacity is as compared to Alan Dershowitz?

Ruane gets more crazy after the jump.

Ruane wanted to make sure that there was no race-card left un-played:

“They are KKK in a box,” said lawyer James O. Ruane of Shelton. “We really have some racist machines here.”

“Racist machines?” Somebody needs to cancel Ruane’s subscription to the SciFi channel and hand him a high-school science textbook. Unless somebody gets this man some education the next time a black man fails a field sobriety test, we’re going to be hearing about how black people are more “geotropic” than whites.

It’s really hard to convince people that actions or thoughts or “tests” they have come to rely on and accept are prejudiced in any way. But Ruane isn’t really helping anybody when he equates sobriety test with the Klan, and he’s not helping anybody when he uses crackpot science as evidence that black people “can’t breathe too good.”

There are some real battles to fight, this isn’t one of them.

Is the Breathalyzer Racist? [A Public Defender]
Lawyer: Alcohol testing device is racist [Connecticut Post]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:04 PM

H.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:06 PM

O.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:10 PM

Are you too stupid to understand WTF a generalization is?

It is not inconsistent to say:
1. Blacks on average have a lower lung capacity than whites.
2. Some blacks have a much higher lung capacity than some whites.

Man, you're so fucking stupid. It's a good thing that breathing is an involuntary response. Otherwise, you'd be too stupid to figure out how to do it.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:11 PM

THIRD, HOMEY. leave AM100. come be a plaintiff's lawyer and make bank. NYC legal is done!!

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:11 PM

This is a hot mess. It's also hysterical.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:12 PM

If the lung capacity of a black man is smaller than a white man, then why are blacks so more athletic? Or are those damn Kenyan's just white dudes in blackface?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:12 PM

I think Elie's posts are a series of logical-reasoning puzzles. The task is to find the logical fault in Elie's conclusion.

I got it!

The logical disconnect here is in assuming that what is generally true for a given population is true for an individual within the population. Your comparison of MJ and Dershowitz is irrelevant to the question that seems to have been addressed by the guy at Univ. of Wash, which is the average lung capacity of black men vs. white men. The fact that MJ's lungs likely have a significantly higher capacity proves nothing.

So while this evidence may not be as powerful as Mr. Ruane seems to think, it is certainly probative of the accuracy of the machine.

As an aside, it's not crazy or racist to allow that there may be physiological differences between populations. Certain populations get sickle-cell disease at higher rates, while others contract breast cancer much more often. You're discounting this evidence through an emotional knee-jerk reaction, not through any substantive criticism of the findings.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:13 PM

I know he breathes because I can hear it when he returns from runs to the vending machine.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:13 PM

I thought that one of the physiological characteristics of black people was a larger lung capacity, which is the reason so many of them excel in athletics. Its tied in with how Africans evolved in a separate and distinct climate than Europeans.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:13 PM

I know he breathes because I can hear it when he returns from runs to the vending machine.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:14 PM

9 = Jimmy the Greek

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:15 PM

9 = Jimmy the Greek

13 Posted by TTTroll | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:15 PM

This is not true. I used to toke up with my black friend from FCU back when we were applying for SCOTUS clerkships (just barely missed out), and he would always bogart the whole freaking thing in one puff.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:20 PM

3 (and others) - Save the overinflated hatred of Elie to your vapid minds. Fine, you don't like his writing "style" or posts. Quite frankly, I'm surprised anyone would have such strong opinions about them either way. But really, get a life... and something worth being that angry about. I'm sick of wasting my time reading your garbage. But I suppose that's my fault. And don't bother replying because I don't plan on caring about your overthought out retorts.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:20 PM

Do you really need a breathalizer test to tell you that black people are always drunk? What a stupid gizmo.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:21 PM

9 = Jimmy the Greek

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:21 PM

"Asians are on average shorter than blacks.
But that can't be right since Yao Ming is so tall. Ergo, there are no differences in height between Asians and blacks. The research that Asians are shorter must be 'crackpot science.' "
~Elie's 160 LSAT logic

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:22 PM

3% difference in lung capacity would explain the difference between 0.079 and 0.081, not 0.80 and 0.188. He'd also have to prove that blacks were we excluded from the data that led to deciding on 0.08 as the legal limit.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:23 PM

Elie- this isn't totally off the wall. If a woman argued the same thing no one would call BS on it. If there is legitimate scientific evidence that this is true then I don't think it's wrong for a lawyer to use it to try to get his client out of it.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:26 PM

If Elie had come out in support of Ruane, you'd say he was a fat, angry, racist black Panther. Since he didn't, you say he's fat and stupid. Either way he loses.

Elie, stop trying to please these bored idiots. They're all just waiting to be made redundant.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:26 PM

MOORECLOPS

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:26 PM

Jimmy Ruane has a billboard on I-95 in Bridgeport, CT. His number is 1-800-NOT DRUNK. No joke.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:27 PM

14 is definitely Mystal. The dead giveaway: "I don't plan on caring about your overthought out retorts."

Yeah, there is definitely something wrong with thinking before retorting. We should just type without thinking, like 14/Mystal.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:27 PM

You people, especially 3, need to stop trying to justify a dumb argument.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:28 PM

Smoking pot decreases lung capacity.

All black people smoke pot.

LOGICAL DEDUCTION: test is racist.

26 Posted by TTTroll | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:30 PM

Skinny losers, crack smokers, asthma patients, coal miners, chemical plant employees, NYC residents, people who once tried to commit suicide via car exhaust, and women who wear corsets all have a scientifically provable lower lung capacity, too.

So shall we throw out all their breathalyzer results?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:30 PM

Science purporting to describe racial differences is never ok. The only difference between races is skin color--it is the only thing that evolved differently after people left Africa. This should not be admitted.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:30 PM

Ruane has tried to take on the Intoxilyzer before with all sorts of silly filings. It never works. He's an idiot.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:31 PM

17

That made me laugh

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:32 PM

Enough is enough! I have had it with these motherfucking drunk drivers on our motherfucking roads!

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:32 PM

27, I agree. For the purposes of political correctness we need to apply the test for sickle-cell anemia to everyone, even though the test on white people is a waste of money.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:36 PM

I think Elie has a bad case of Vlasick's Pickle Cell Anemia.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:39 PM

Did anyone else notice that this guy's BAL was 0.188? More than twice the limit? Its not as if he was kinda close or maybe a slight miscalibration in the machine made the difference.

I doubt they would even need BAL evidence to convict someone that drunk, he was probably barfing on the arresting officer's shoes.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:41 PM

33 is right on the point. The court should feel free to give him the 3% average lung size difference -- he's still way over the limit. Somehow, I doubt the machine overestimates how drunk blacks are by over 50%. This doesn't exactly seem like the right test case even if the breathalyzers are somewhat inaccurate.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:42 PM

That's not even how the breathalyzer works. The machine measures the BAC based on breath. As long as there is a sample, it measures the BAC. It has nothing to do with lung capacity (or race/gender/sexual orientation or whether one wears a crew neck t-shirt under the button down work shirt).

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:42 PM


This is just more proof that we need affirmative action to level the lung capacity playing field.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:42 PM

Er, correction, over 100%. Even worse.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:42 PM

What's a black jew, daddy?

Why its a Blew, son. everyone knows that. now run along you little scamp, its almost time for bed.

Excerpted from Tom Tucker's Book "The Hibbidy with the Dibbity."

39 Posted by nervous T10 1L | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:43 PM

is this more or less racist than the lsat?

-nervous T-10 1L
email job leads to nervoust101l@yahoo.com

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:50 PM

MysTTTal, the only thing discriminating against you is the 300lbs you've gained thanks to Frito Lay.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:53 PM

3 & 7-
Does the same apply to the differences in intelligence? I tried this argument when advocating an increase in our URM affirmative action program but it didn't meet the positive reception I thought it would.
-Dean Kagan

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:53 PM

This type of thing has been around for a while. For example, a lot of people contend that many cameras and camcorders are "racist" b/c their automatic focus setting is optimized for white faces and not black faces. Therefore, African Americans tend to appear "dark" while crackers are lit optimally.

Just for the record, Elie = dumbass.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:54 PM

ok, but as a biglaw lawyer, all i care about is my bonus. will S&C match skadden?

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:57 PM

32- I lulzed

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:05 PM

Hi Science, my name's Law, have we met?


avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:06 PM

I posted a while back noting that Elie has real trouble with statistics. This confirms it.

From his inability to understand the flaws in those in those gender-pay gap studies, to his confusion about the difference between avergages and individual cases, he consistently shows that he doesn't have even a basic understanding of statistical reasoning.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:07 PM

I posted a while back noting that Elie has real trouble with statistics. This confirms it.

From his inability to understand the flaws in those in those gender-pay gap studies, to his confusion about the difference between avergages and individual cases, he consistently shows that he doesn't have even a basic understanding of statistical reasoning.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:08 PM

I am an associate at Baker McKenzie and the firm has just matched the bonuses announced by Cravath.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:10 PM

Sullivan & Cromwell has just issued Skadden-esque bonuses. Memo to follow.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:10 PM

I am an associate at Kirkland & Ellis and the firm has just matched the bonuses announced by Cravath.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:14 PM

Breathalyzer tests are racist because, as studies consistently show, vodka, whiskey and appletinis produce burps that are on average 30% less pungent than those produced by Olde English 800 and St. Ides Special Brew.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:14 PM

wow this guy went to a t50 school...

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:17 PM

all you white-ivy league-never-leave-my-big-firm-office-in-my-nifty-business-casual-clothes should stop by a real courtroom to see how this really works (the SDNY does not count). In a depressed town like Bridgeport, where minorities are routinely stopped by the mostly white police force--guess what, judges tend to like these types of arguments, regardless of whether your crim procedure books say it's a viable defense.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:20 PM

Right 53, the real courtrooms are where Jim "the Hammer" Shapiro moonlights as a Justice of the Peace. SDNY is for the birds.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:20 PM

53- you're post is an argument against elected judges, manumission, and democracy

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:21 PM

53- your post is an argument against elected judges, manumission, and democracy

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:21 PM

53- your post is an argument against elected judges, manumission, and democracy

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:32 PM

Did any firms really announce?

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:37 PM

When Elie said "Mmm ... blanket generalizations about an entire people. I wonder what Michael Jordan's lung capacity is as compared to Alan Dershowitz?" I think he was referring to "...determined the Intoxilyzer 5000 does not effectively test the blood-alcohol content of black men", and not to the fact about lung capacity.
He was not saying that the 3% statistic is false, he was pointing out that it's pretty meaningless given the variation between individuals and calling into question the Dr.'s blanket statement that it doesn't accurately test BAC. Both valid points.
You should think things through before calling someone stupid.

60 Posted by David Brent | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:45 PM

nervous T10 1L is no Loyola 2L

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:49 PM

33 = lightweight

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:52 PM

59 - no, that's not the case. If you were going to object to the argument by claiming that the breathalyzer has already taken into account the wide variation in individual lung capacity, then say so.

Elie objected to the statistic itself - not its application to the breathalyzer issue. He has a long history of misunderstanding statistics.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:58 PM

S&C really announced, and they are matching Skadden (mostly).

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:58 PM

I love how ATL trolls are being forced to pick between either defending this stupid argument about the breathalyzer OR defending the hated Mystal

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 7:28 PM

Great, now the blacks want affirmative action for the breathalyzer test.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 8:25 PM

Elie, writing in the first person in a blog post that has nothing to do with you is undignified. Please resign from ATL; you are unworthy.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 25, 2008 11:21 PM

"Brown is African American"

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 12:12 AM

I've been complaining about racist breathalysers for years its good to hear it getting some air time.

I have some additional complaints. Including the idolization of racists in the media (for example Flipper was also a racist dolphin, and Lassi a racist collie).

Additionally, I used a racist condom (which discriminated against my much larger than average wang and failed to prevent a pregnancy) back in '95 and shouldn't have to pay child support.

I also have been discriminated back in '76 against due to a racist comb that got stuck in my afro and I had to cut it out. This caused me great emotional distress as I had an afro with a chunk missing; eventually, leading me to try out a jheri curl.

My cell phone is racist too because its designed for Japanese people's fingers and not mine. It has caused me to misdial repeatedly.

avatar
69 Posted by PHenry | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 12:34 AM

This is actually not the worst Breathalyzer legal situation in Connecticut!!!

Here in New London, in response to complaints from local businesses regarding a homeless shelter in the basement of a church; a few anecdotal charges of drunk homeless people affecting their businesses (the lead lead complainant was a funeral home - no seriously) - the City Council in a snap decision, discussed only briefly in full session, only those already in attendance able to speak to the issue; then huddled in the corner during recess, came back back and instituted MANDATORY BREATHALYSER TESTS to anyone seeking to enter the shelter. Making peaceful sober people submit to further indignity by taking a breathalyser or be turned away at the door.

Further, a New York district court ruled a few years back that a municipality has no jurisdiction over a church who chooses to allow homeless people to seek refuge on its property as a free expression of their religious beliefs and values.

But the fascist New London City Council waived legal review, passed laws it wasn't entitled to pass and threatened legal ramifications if the shelter and church didn't comply.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 12:42 AM

Damn, they just had to figure it out. The breathalyzer was designed by the national society of tall white guys. Because... you know... on average, tall people have bigger lungs than short people. Guys have bigger lungs than girls. People have bigger lungs than gerbals. So in addition to being a tool of my racism, it also is heightist, genderist, speciesist and assuming all jewish guys look like Jon Stewart, anti-semetic. Special thanks to (the short) Tom Cruise for taking one for the white guy team though. We gotta keep everyone guessing.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 12:48 AM

Sorry, 69. This is worse.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 1:40 AM

FIrst.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 2:01 AM

me - white male
my generalization -

in general blacks are better athletes than white.
but john daly is a better athlete than clarence thomas

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 8:28 AM

How does lung capacity affect the blood-alcohol reading of the Intoxilyzer 5000? Doesn't everyone have a different lung capacity?

If results differ depending on lung capacity, and everyone has a different lung capacity, this device is useless.

In fact, ability to function under the influence of alcohol also varies by individual. Let's get rid of these silly devices and make people walk the line again.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 8:46 AM

In the small town in Connecticut in which I live, the high school have the local pd breathalize all of the students before permitting them to attend the prom or any other school dance. Not aproblem as we only have six black kids in the high school - most of whome are athletes brought in from other less advantaged communities to oestensibley give them a better eduction, but in reality to deal witht he fact that the whoite kids aren't big enough to play football. I assume these kids don't have a 3% smaller on average lung capacity.

Nothing should surprise you about Connecticut.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:17 PM

If the glove don't fit you must acquit!

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:19 PM

No, the lawyer got it all wrong. It wasn't the machine that was racist, it was the digtial NUMBERS on the machine that were racist. Geez.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:25 PM

This is great precedent.

Prosecutor: Is it true, sir that the police caught you with a dimebag of marijuana?

Defendent: Mannnn, that marijuana was racist!

Jury: Not guilty.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:27 PM

This is great precedent.

Prosecutor: Is it true, sir that the police caught you with a dimebag of marijuana?

Defendent: Mannnn, that marijuana was racist!

Jury: Not guilty.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 2, 2008 9:27 PM

78 = a fool.

Marijuana doesn't come in dimebags.

Post Your Comment