Add RSS RSS

Associate Bonus Watch: Schulte Roth & Zabel Announces Half-Skadden Bonus (But Will Still Pay Additional Money To High Billers)

More bonus news today, this time from Schulte Roth & Zabel. The numbers are not surprising:

law firm associate bonus watch 2008 biglaw bonuses.jpgClass Year: Bonus

2008: $17,500 (pro rated)
2007: $17,500
2006: $20,000
2005: $22,500
2004: $25,000
2003: $27,500
2002: $30,000
2001: $32,500
2000: $32,500
1999: $32,500

Schulte has an hours target, but it also claims Cerberus as a major client. Cerberus owns Chrysler… so there has probably been at least a little legal work flying around SRZ.

Schulte has historically given extra bonuses to associates who go above and beyond the call of reason duty. That will not change this year. The firm announced an extra $10K for associates who hit 2300 hours, and an extra $20K for associates who hit 2500 hours. Associates who hit 3,000 hours get $20K (and their own “special” padded room).

In this market, every little bit helps. Good job by Schulte to at least keep paying their high billers a decent bonus.

Read the full memo after the jump.

SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL — MEMORANDUM — ASSOCIATE BONUSES

Schulte bonus memo page 1.JPG
Schulte bonus memo page 2.JPG

Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of associate bonuses

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:05 PM

Dude Half-Skadden just isn't funny anymore. 9th!!!!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:05 PM

1

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:07 PM

A whopping $10k (before taxes) for an additional 300 hours? Geez, that sucks.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:07 PM

COME. ON. S&C.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:07 PM

Fif! Eat my ass #20!

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:07 PM

1

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:09 PM

Associates who bill 3,000+ hours / yr don't care whether they get an extra fat bonus because they don't have time to spend the extra $$

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:10 PM

in my day we received a carton of cigarettes and a hooker as a bonus and if you were really lucky you got to shake the name partner's hand...what happened?

-old partner dood
llb '52

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:11 PM

That does not suck #4, that's a totally baller $33.33 an hour (before taxes). Law school was a great investment!

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:12 PM

I want to get me come of that juicy Scavath...... mmmmmm

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:13 PM

11th!

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:13 PM

FIRST to say that 8 is the best new schtick on atl...suck it count layoffula.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:13 PM

4, you're right. that's only $33.33 an hour. members of the UAW get more than that working for the Big Three.

BIG LAW ASSOCIATES TO FEDERAL BAIL OUT MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:14 PM

4: Except for 1 or 2 others who have said they will pay an unspecified amount to certain high billers, its better than what other firms are paying associates who bill those high numbers. They're paying a whopping nothing.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:14 PM

Associates who bill 3,000+ hours / yr don't care whether they get an extra fat bonus because they don't have time to spend the extra $$

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:15 PM

WHOA IS ME!

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:15 PM

3,
It ain't great, but it's better than the $0 (also before taxes) you get at almost any other firm.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:17 PM

You are not your bonus, you are not how much money you have in the bank and you are not your f''ing khakis

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:17 PM

I don't check in daily ... can someone post a round of all the firms that have announced so far and their positions: Skadden, half-Skadden, or some other scheme? Thanks!

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:18 PM

so those "high billers" are getting paid less than $35/hr for their extra work? Those guys must not be very good at math.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:19 PM

Okay, now I'm pissed.

-- PW Associate who billed 3k this year.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:19 PM

3,000 hours? My goodness. I can't even imagine the hour padding going on there.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:20 PM

good post mystal

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:21 PM

Schtick's are for dicks who live their mothers and order them to make meatloaf.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:21 PM

21, did you know that Paul Weiss was a lockstep firm before you joined?
If not, you're a retard.
If yes, shut your whining.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:22 PM

This type of story is not news anymore.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:23 PM

Mystal is so eager to make Cravath and all of it followers look bad that he neglects to mention that if you bill less than 2000 hours at Schulte, you get $5000 or $10,000, WAY LESS THAN "Half-Skadden." Seriously, Elie is a Cravath hater douchebag who misrepresents the facts. This blog is so biased and sucks.

23- is an idiot

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:23 PM

20 - If the work is there... its not like you can say... "Sorry Partner X, I don't think I'm going to do this because though I'm being billed out at several hundred dollars an hour, I'm only getting about $35/hour pretax in return at this point since Im over 2000 hours on the year. That's just not a good deal for me." If you have work to do, you have to do it. It's just nice to see something extra, no matter how much it is... especially since colleagues at other firms are getting nada for working the longer hours.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:24 PM

23 = Elie

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:26 PM

3,
It ain't great, but it's better than the $0 (also before taxes) you get at almost any other firm.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:27 PM

"'special' padded room" - I like that. How about an "extra-special" padded room for those of us who haven't had any work to do for the past two months?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:27 PM

I <3 Count Layoffula and old partner

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:28 PM

They even give a guaranteed bonus for those with less than $2,000. Classy, unlike everyone else with billable requirements who gives absolutely nothing.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:30 PM

what qualifies as "target hours"?

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:31 PM

8=======)

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:32 PM

20, you think high billers can just turn away work?
You must not be very good at staying employed.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:32 PM

33 - that's a scam. All associates with less than 2,000 hours have been stealth-laid off already.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:33 PM

So at 2300 hours, SRZ first years get $37,500 on top of $160,000 base and that is considered weak???? All things considered, whiners on here are unreasonable.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:34 PM

wow lots of internet badasses on here. relax 27, i liked his struck out reason/duty and padded room comments. you may feel like cravath is getting pissed on, but like it or not, they significantly lowered the market when even the huge behemoth *skadden* could afford to pay twice that.

- 23, not elie

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:34 PM

33 - that's a scam. All associates with less than 2,000 hours have been stealth-laid off already.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:37 PM

Is Schulte Roth a law firm? I thought it was a German engineering brand.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:38 PM

23 = Elie

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:38 PM

Sorry. Am I supposed to feel bad for these people who, in bonus alone, are making more than many people working harder and in worse conditions? You know, people who actually put in a hard days work that doesn't involve pushing paper? Be grateful already. Shut your traps. You signed up to be abused, and if this is as bad as it gets then you are truly blessed.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:39 PM

Sorry. Am I supposed to feel bad for these people who, in bonus alone, are making more than many people working harder and in worse conditions? You know, people who actually put in a hard days work that doesn't involve pushing paper? Be grateful already. Shut your traps. You signed up to be abused, and if this is as bad as it gets then you are truly blessed.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:41 PM

42 = trig palin

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:42 PM

What you people aren't realizing is that very few people at Schulte will even hit 2,000 hours so the firm won't be paying much of this out.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:44 PM

I'd take an occasional hooker (monthly? biweekly?) over a bonus, assuming they're hot.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:45 PM

To 22: (regarding 3k hours).

It is possible to bill that much legitimately. My first two years as an associate, I did that (with no padding, I assure you). I worked nearly every night to near midnight, did a full all-nighter at least once every week and a half, came in every Sunday for 5-7 hours (and some Saturdays too).

Eagle

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:47 PM

S&C JUST MATCHED SKADDEN!!

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:52 PM

38 -- Learn to add. It takes 2500 hours to get a first year $37,500 bonus. 2300 hours gets you $27,500.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:52 PM

49- what glee do you get out of making up some fucking stupid rumor that no one ever would believe? go fuck yourself you stupid moron.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:54 PM

49 = Fool me once...

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:55 PM

Its Bush's fault! And the Israelis too of course.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:56 PM

49- what glee do you get out of making up some fucking stupid rumor that no one ever would believe? go fuck yourself you stupid moron.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:57 PM

I'm amazed to read the comments from all the associates thinking they are the partners' slaves, not able to manage their own workload by turning away work when they are busier then they would like to be. They must feel that they are powerless and that the partners own them. How pathetic and sad.

Then, when they are thrown a bone (i.e. $20k "bonus") after letting those same partners steal their lives (i.e. work 3k hours), they come on this blog and try to defend this system. Some even argue that associates should feel happy to make this much money, as if making the money is the incentive for this additional work. It's irrational.

This must be a variation of Stockholm syndrome.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:58 PM

Who is ROD PAMPERS?

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:59 PM

wtf bills 3000 hours in this economy? Especially if you are not padding. That is insane, shame about the bonuses. You folk need to tone it down a bit. Turn down extra work. Take your significant others out for a night on the town. Play with your children.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:59 PM

I don't know why everyone is hatin' on the extra bonus for extra hours. No other firm rewarded those that worked harder. Props to Schulte.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:59 PM

43/44 -- did those people invest $100k+ in education and 3 additional years of their lives to get their jobs? Didn't think so. Never compare this professional culture to Joe the Plumber or the guy pushing asphalt, because it isn't even comparable.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:00 PM

47 = Nervous T10 1L

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:03 PM

59- agreed. 43/44 go back to your minimum wage job. why would you even be on this site in the first place? this is just another example of why the economy is in the shitter- people like you making decisions.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:04 PM

BTW, as for this purported $20k bonus for working 3000 hours, I've never heard of that at SRZ. It's certainly not part of the bonus memo (though it does make sense, consistent with the escalator structure). I'm glad I don't know from experience.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:05 PM

How much $$ did the summer associate who put the partner in a headlock get?
http://abovethelaw.com/2008/06/summer_associate_of_the_day_ra.php

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:14 PM

Litigators will hit 2300. Transactional attorneys may not even hit 2000.

Not that its anyone's fault or to anyone's credit, but this is SRZ's way of compensating people who put in longer hours. Transactional attorney's will have far less work and will therefore have more free time. Attorneys who still have to work through treacherous hours shouldnt be dragged down just because the corporate practices are slow.

Could this be the case? Shouldn't more firms do this? I'm asking not telling....

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:23 PM

SkaTTT-TTTon

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:28 PM

At what point will you realize how stupid you sound pontificating about a "market rate" set by one firm? Why not call Skadden's bonus a "quarter Marty" in honor of our generous friends at Wachtell?

You're not Lat. You're not even a competent blogger yet. Please just stick to the basics.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:30 PM

in past years, the associates who do not make 2,000 hours got $10k across the board.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:32 PM

in past years, the associates who do not make 2,000 hours got $10k across the board.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 3:50 PM

This bonus structure is the worst so far. 2000 hour requirement in this economy or you get basically nothing?

Those "special" bonuses are for special people. $33/hour is so win.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 4:01 PM

63, that kid got no-offered and escorted out by security on his last day.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 4:05 PM

first, there is no extra 20,000 for 3,000 hours.

second, srz - like many other firms - has always had the 2,000 minimum.

third, for all those people who are criticizing the extra 10,000 for 2,300 and 2,500, respectively, just think about all the people who billed 2,500 at cravath, pw, dpw, simpson, etc. and don't get the extra 20,000.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 4:15 PM

The thing that gets me about all this is that you know the members of the Cravath Compensation Committee (if they have such a committee) smiling about all this and slapping each other on the back at the success of their bonus-lowering gambit. Other firms would have followed Skadden but for Cravath.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 4:16 PM

PAUL WEISS SUCKS!!!!!!

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 4:51 PM

66=Cravath-hole

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 4:55 PM

Hey: 59, 61 - SUCK IT. You know its true that people who take these jobs have no right to complain about compensation. What? The $165K STARTING SALARY isn't enough for you to live on even with debt? It's more than adequate. Your argument holds no water. You are all just pissed because your fragile egos were the real victims here. Why don't you go back to your real jobs - being low level associates who only do discovery and doc review (oh, when there's work) - and stop trying to convince the rest of us that your anger is in anyway justified. Sad and pathetic. If that bonus is so measly, why not donate it to a charity that needs it. Oh, and lest we forget: it is people like who you claim to be who have been making all the decisions in this country - and it is the decisions of people like you who have ruined things. Angry, insecure people who think they have something to prove are deadly.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 5:02 PM

Would someone who bills 3000+ hours be considered a BALLER at Schulte and Zabel? I'm talking popping bottles of Dom P at da club kind of baller.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 5:06 PM

75 - Pardon if I say so, but you sound pretty angry and insecure dude (or ma'am).

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 5:11 PM

75 - Let me get this straight... You troll a blog for LAWYERS and then spew your inflammatory bs and that what... makes you cool? If you have such issues, go elsewhere. Clearly, unless you work in Biglaw and put in the type of hours people are talking about, you have absolutely ZERO credibility when it comes to commenting about getting a small bonus at the end of the year.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 6:46 PM

Shulte PAWNED its associates. PAWN SHOP.

Yeah. It's me.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 7:02 PM

It's official. Debevoise just went half Skadden. You heard it here first.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 7:05 PM

SRZ - you want a Paul Weiss 5th year? I billed 2800 so far this year. I want to work at a firm that will reward hard work.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 7:09 PM

I have no opinion on this firm's bonus structure.

Ed Stimes

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 7:41 PM

81: Paul Weiss 2nd year with 3000 plus hours....I'm with you

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 8:33 PM

Schulttte Rottth & Zabel

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 9:38 PM

81 and 83, I am with you. Who in their right minds would ever write down less than 2800 hours in an environment like this? Hey ass clowns out there, you still have like three weeks left. Find out who has a case or a deal going, and write down 600 hours on it for December. Another tip, find out who has lots of "unbilled time," like on a contingency matter or success fee matter. If the time is not billed, often you can have your sec'y go into the billing software and write down hours for previous months. That is often the way to go, because you can add another eight or nine hundred hours without anyone noticing. HTH.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 9, 2008 9:40 PM

UNLESS YOUR LIFE"S AMBITION IS TO WORK FOR THE CERBERUS LEGAL DEPARTMENT GO TO ANOTHER FIRM

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, December 10, 2008 8:26 AM

All Cerberus transactional group will get bail out money to pay their bonuses. Very strict target for bonus so it will not be easy to get paid. Hedge fund group obviously not a strong year.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:20 AM

55 - keep in mind that a lot of biglaw associates have pretty low self-esteem and high aversion to risk... that's why they're in biglaw.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:00 AM

Yeah, I heard from a friend who works there that they have been doing stealth layoffs pretty much since the start of the slow-down. Also, she mentioned they have a couple of partners in their hedge fund practice who make it downright impossible for some to hit the 2000 mark . . .

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:15 AM

Yeah, I heard from a friend whose been there a while they have been doin stealth layoffs for a while now. Also, she mentioned they have a couple of real a*holes in their funds practice who make it near impossible for some to hit the 2000 mark. Thanks to big papa Cerberus, the transactional group is a different story. 37 is right about this sounding bogus.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 19, 2008 8:11 PM

86 is right . . . schulte's clients suck.

89/90 is right. i heard schulte's been doing stealth layoffs all year based on "performance." i heard if you sneeze the wrong way, you lose your job.

Post Your Comment