Add RSS RSS

Law Firm Merger Mania: Thacher Proffitt To Be Rescued by King & Spalding?

Thacher.jpgTalks between Thacher Proffitt and King & Spalding, a story we broke here, remain ongoing. From the Legal Times:

Atlanta-based King & Spalding is in talks to acquire most, but not all of Thacher Proffitt & Wood’s lawyers, say two sources aware of the discussions. In order to avoid dissolution, New York-based Thacher hopes to find a partner to acquire it, these sources say.

One New York legal consultant says the discussions have been ongoing for the past three to four months, and that the firms hope to reach an agreement by year-end. The consultant says King & Spalding is considering taking on about 100 of Thacher’s 195 lawyers, but that it’s not yet clear which practices and offices the 100 lawyers would come from. “There’s a tremendous amount of uncertainty about who’s going to be invited to the party,” says the consultant, who asked not to be named.

Not sure we’d call it a “party.” But the alternative to a K&S acquisition isn’t appealing:

[Thacher’s] overall headcount is down more than 100 lawyers compared to last year — and so are its profits. Profits per partner fell more than 22 percent in 2007 to $1.02 million, according to the Am Law 200.

The firm has had a constant stream of high-profile departures, including its vice chairman Thomas Leslie, who decamped for Greenberg Traurig in October, and Washington managing partner Richard Schaberg, who left for Hogan & Hartson’s D.C. office last month. The New York consultant and another individual familiar with the discussions say that if the deal falls through, Thacher Proffitt will likely go under.

It’s worth noting that TPW has placed its New York headquarters up for sublease (as reported by Lindsay Fortado and David Levitt of Bloomberg). If TPW is seeking a subtenant for all five floors it leases at Two World Financial Center, then one has to wonder if the firm plans to continue operations (at least in its current form).

As for King & Spalding, it’s growing strategically, despite the downturn. The firm recently snagged three energy partners from Kirkland & Ellis. KS hopefully has room in the lifeboat for Thacherites seeking a new home.

To Avoid Dissolution, Thacher Proffitt Talks With King & Spalding [Legal Times via WSJ Law Blog]
Thacher Proffitt Puts Up New York Office Space for Sublease [Bloomberg]
King & Spalding Adds Three Energy Partners in Washington, D.C. [King & Spalding]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:30 PM

FIRST

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:33 PM

thirdsty

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:33 PM

Unlikely in this environment. No bank support = no merger.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:33 PM

Heard that the firm was already dissolving.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:33 PM

2

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:34 PM

First the snowman

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:34 PM

2

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:34 PM

Firsty the snowman

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:35 PM

King and Spalding's NY office is a joke. They removed the managing partner a few years ago. Word is the Atlanta office was propping up the NY office. It is basically an IP boutique now, from what I understand. My guess is that King and Spalding is probably focused on Thacher Proffitt's NY office. Taking on an established NY office seems like a good way from King and Spalding to grow that office and its profitability after years of failure. Looks like a good move to me.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:38 PM

Only $1M profit per partner? How will they ever make do?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:38 PM

9,

Is TPW even profitable though?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:39 PM

Isn't Spalding just an older Trig Palin?

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:39 PM

So at the end of all of this consolidation, there will be about a dozen truly large firms left? I wonder if associate salaries in NY and other large markets will remain at current levels or decrease a little? Anyone have thoughts?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:41 PM

HI CAVEMAN! DIE!

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:42 PM

HI CAVEMAN! DIE!

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:43 PM

A&B eats K&S's lunch.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:44 PM

where is elie

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:44 PM

These firms are what I believe the young associates call tee-tee-tee.

-old partner dood
llb '52

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:45 PM

Is TPW what Skadden uses to wipe the Ass Cravath?

i'm just sayin...

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:46 PM

Associates are already testing the limits of fungibility at the end of the year and beyond.

Will be interesting to see which TPW associate makes it and the ones that don't.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:48 PM

mr. lat: please, please keep posting here. other, ahem, bloggers on this site don't write as well as you, and they post news after it has broken. they also give nonsense advice such as "accept your offers."

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:48 PM

you'll have nothing and like it!

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:51 PM

TTThacher ProfiTTT

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:51 PM

Anyone know what K&S bonuses are?

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:54 PM

hate to break it to you all, but several other sites "broke" this news before Lat...

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:58 PM

18 = awesome

- not 18

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:58 PM

K&S bonus: You get to go home and see your family for a whole day!

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:00 PM

K&S looks strong these days.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:01 PM

18 did not nail it, missed the nail completely, and smashed his gay little thumb like Mystal smashes cupcakes.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:01 PM

how so?

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:03 PM

KS = Kilpatrick Stockon.
K&S = King & Spalding.

~Non-NYC Atty.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:05 PM

31: Both are TTTs so who cares?

33 Posted by Count Layoffula | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:06 PM

ONE HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE! ONE HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE THACHER PROFFITT LAWYERS!!!

ONE HUNDRED! ONE HUNDRED GOING TO KING & SPALDING!!!!!

LET US COUNT THE RESULTING LAYOFFS!!!! AH AH AH AH AH!!!!!!!!!

- Count Layoffula

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:08 PM

32 - You seem to have taken the time to read not only the post re. K&S but the comments as well....

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:09 PM

Who is ROD PAMPERS?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:11 PM

1 <3 count layoffula

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:11 PM

I think 18's comment is hilarious.
- 18 wanna be striver

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:12 PM

old partner dood
1) stop posting how much you like your lame posts right after posting
2) stop posting all together, nervous is genius by comparison, and he's an idiot

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:13 PM

13, associate salaries won't being going anywhere unless hours worked drop. Here's a fun exercise: take your salary plus your bonus, and divide that sum by the number of hours you spent at work/out recruiting this year.

A decently busy first year should get ~$55/hr this year, of which ~$25/hr goes straight to income taxes. That associate is sacrificing almost an entire year of their late twenties, after sleep and taxes, for the princely rate of $30 an hour.

$30 an hour.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:16 PM

Who is ROD PAMPERS?

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:19 PM

where's Jack Bauer? He was legitimately funny.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:19 PM

#9 do you even know what you're talking about? Look at the work coming out of the NY office, not to mention 9 new offices that all came from NY and Atlanta based partners. If anything, NY is central to the firm's strategic growth. TP would be lucky to be picked up by K&S.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:20 PM

#9 do you even know what you're talking about? Look at the work coming out of the NY office, not to mention 9 new offices that all came from NY and Atlanta based partners. If anything, NY is central to the firm's strategic growth. TP would be lucky to be picked up by K&S.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:20 PM

K+S New York office is already a joke. It becomes a really BAD joke if they acquire TTThatcher ProffiTTT

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:28 PM

They should merge with CWT. They are a much stronger shop and are weathering this storm better than most people give them credit for.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:28 PM

Does TPW still have its SF group? I thought ATL reported that the whole group was axed shortly after closing the AP office. So, what is the structure of TPW now?

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:30 PM

39, first year tax attorney here. $90/hour, or $70/hour after taxes (did I mention I'm a tax attorney?).

Suck it :-)

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:31 PM

Testing.. one...

Testing... two

Testing... three

Testing the limits of fungibility!

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:32 PM

Does TPW still have its SF group? I thought ATL reported that the whole group was axed shortly after closing the AP office. So, what is the structure of TPW now?

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:32 PM

47: So you're saying you never get ass...

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:36 PM

Does TPW still have its SF group? I thought ATL reported that the whole group was axed shortly after closing the AP office. So, what is the structure of TPW now?

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:37 PM

47 -- I have a sheep you can borrow for the weekend.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:42 PM

I sense jealously of 47.

-not 47, not a tax atty.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:44 PM

i don't think they removed the mp of the nyc office, think he left for other opportunities taking with him a very large book.

while i wouldn't wish k&s on anyone, it's better than no job. good luck to the tpw associates that dont get invited to join.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:47 PM

52, trust me, the general population does not notice any difference between corporate lawyers and corporate tax lawyers. And arguably, working with corporate tax law is marginally more interesting than making conforming changes in contracts from singular to plural.

~47

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:50 PM

Atlanta attorney here...K&S is going strong. they cleaned house early in the year when no one would notice. Dont know much about the NY office. California is doing okay with some institutional clients keeping them open (i.e. no real new client base). cali is an IP shop (which i think was intended since the only real high level person over there in the beginning was their ip chair).

and no, i dont work at K&S. in fact, I am at one of their competitor firms, dont like working against them, but, have to give props to success.

57 Posted by Jack Bauer | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:51 PM

41-

I appreciate the support, but I've got my own legal problems to deal with. Some Senators want to talk to me about events that happened while I was at my old firm (now dissolved). Apparently they aren't comfortable with my deviation from procedure in achieving superior results. It's like an associate billing over 3500 hours a year and then having some partner complain that the Seamless bill is a "little" high. If you want me to make dinner, don't ask me how much I paid for the groceries...

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:52 PM

55,

There is a singular difference between corporate lawyers and corporate tax lawyers. The former are being laid off in droves while the latter are still working industriously.

Another tax lawyer.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:52 PM

32 - awesome.

I want a hamburg...no, a cheeseburger. I want a hot dog. I want a milkshake...

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:53 PM

i don't think they removed the mp of the nyc office, think he left for other opportunities taking with him a very large book.

while i wouldn't wish k&s on anyone, it's better than no job. good luck to the tpw associates that dont get invited to join.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:56 PM

57,

I love you, man.

~ 41

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:01 PM

I feel bad for the summer associates who have offers from Thatcher.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:06 PM

What is doc review? Could someone give me like 5 examples of what someone doing doc review does?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:18 PM

Comment removed by moderator.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:20 PM

38, I disagree. You are stupid. That is all.

- 26

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:25 PM

Haha 64 sounds like he/she was part of the "house cleaning" that was referenced by an early poster. Bitter much?

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:26 PM

*earlier

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:28 PM

Don't be coy, 64-out with the dirt!

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:45 PM

64 nailed it.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 6:56 PM

Comment removed by moderator.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 6:59 PM

K&S NYC didn't remove their MP. Jeff Smith and Steve Brody left to become the litigation group at McKee Nelson (taking 5 other partner and 14 associates with them). But neither was MP - they had only just come over from CWT a few years earlier.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:00 PM

hey 56 - the ip chair at k&s is named courtland ?

is he gay ?

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:24 PM

former mp Michael O'Brien left, and presumably left a pile of money.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:40 PM

TPW's Summit office is toast. If held over, those lawyers better get used to commuting into the city. Good thing gas prices have dropped!

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:58 PM

What is "tee-tee-tee"?

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:02 PM

How are PPP $1MM?? I would think about zero (although I see it's for '07 but still)....

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:02 PM

How are PPP $1MM?? I would think about zero (although I see it's for '07 but still)....

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:16 PM

sorry - newbie here - what is TTT?

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:28 PM

please, PLEASE someone take 78's bait. It will make my life complete.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:41 PM

78 - you are.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:43 PM

But then, so am I according to most on here. Do a quick google search. Research skills: FAIL.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:07 PM

78 here. Got it. TTT = most ATL posters. Shouldn't you guys be studying for finals and sending resumes out to gov't agencies? Douche bags.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:41 PM

Paul Clement instantly moves King & Spalding into the small circle of elite firms. After this market shake-out they should be top 10. I had a chance to go there a couple years ago and now sort of wish I had.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:09 PM

King Proffitt. I like it.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:13 PM

Hey 78/82 - wouldn't ya know it, that's just exactly what I was doing - studying for finals AND sending resumes to gov't agencies, at the same time! You must be precient!

-sucks to be top 1/3 at an L.A. T20 (which is total TTT for this crowd)

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:26 PM

Is 79 happy now?

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:33 PM

did anyone else notice that the Playboy chick is no longer with TPW? did she leave on her own? was she axed? did ATL cover this?

i was certain that a fit body made a girl recession proof, but who knows

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:53 PM

For those of us who litigate, K&S is among the best in the U.S., certainly not TTT. I'm sure its transactional practice is weaker, as is the case for most non-NYC firms. But for litigation, that firm is a machine. If they pick up the core group of good finance lawyers at TPW, then by 2010 this might look genius.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 11:07 PM

The SF group is still at TPW - it is just much smaller than it was a year ago. At this point, I'd be surprised if much of the SF group moves over to K&S. K&S is probably acquiring most all attorneys from the other practice groups.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 11, 2008 11:47 PM

KING AND SPAULDING NEW YORK JUST MATCHED SKADDED ARPS. YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST, MOFOS.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 12:01 AM

Hey 78/82, guys at my high school used to be surrounded by DBs all the time, it was no big deal.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 6:23 AM

The K & S NY office is a steaming TTT. Their former MP was Michael O'Brien, who left after a disasterous few years during which the office was just bleeding lawyers and money bigtime. Especially on the transactional side, the partners with prospects and a book of business mostly left. All this, during boomtime.

I interviewed with them, but thank my lucky stars I didn't accept their offer.


avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 7:36 AM

turnover at KS is 20% every year at all levels

they do have kick ass business model though

they establish relationships with clients at the board level and then force feed overpriced work down the throats of legal department of the client - which work for KS, not the other way around

occasionally this model blow up - as it did recently when the buffoon general counsel that they placed turned out to be incompetent and they lost all work

for laterals, they size people up and decide if they can steal their clients - i suspect this is why the merger is even going froward

they are a firm with lots of sociopaths

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 7:48 AM

Comment removed by moderator.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 8:17 AM

The Paul Clement pick-up for the D.C. office was pretty big. Additionally, stealing three energy partners from K&E was a good move by K&S D.C. I know much less about what goes on in their NYC office...

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 9:35 AM

I blame this on the MO. He knows who he is.

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 10:16 AM

83 - be happy you are not there. i was. it is a hell hole.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 11:38 AM

83 - which office?

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 12:52 PM

The reason why K & S will never be able to play with the big boys internationally is because of its weak institutional client base and the inability of Atlanta to share the pie. Look, it's the dominant Atlanta firm, but that means nothing outside of Atlanta.

Hays and gang can talk all they want about collegiality and the old glory days, but the truth is the firm is now a cut throat every-partner -or-himself-or-herself place. The institutional client relationships are firmly held in the hands of the old Atlanta boys. Few partners outside Atlanta get to benefit from the institutional relationships. Well, unless you were an Atlanta stalwart in the first place. So much for working across offices. New partners are expected to bring in their own work.

Morale is low across the board because the associates all know the firm would rather hire lateral partners than grow organically. Also, if you are a minority, good luck with trying to make it in that white frathouse/sorority culture.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 12:54 PM

The reason why K & S will never be able to play with the big boys internationally is because of its weak institutional client base and the inability of Atlanta to share the pie. Look, it's the dominant Atlanta firm, but that means nothing outside of Atlanta.

Hays and gang can talk all they want about collegiality and the old glory days, but the truth is the firm is now a cut throat every-partner -or-himself-or-herself place. The institutional client relationships are firmly held in the hands of the old Atlanta boys. Few partners outside Atlanta get to benefit from the institutional relationships. Well, unless you were an Atlanta stalwart in the first place. So much for working across offices. New partners are expected to bring in their own work.

Morale is low across the board because the associates all know the firm would rather hire lateral partners than grow organically. Also, if you are a minority, good luck with trying to make it in that white frathouse/sorority culture.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 12:54 PM

The reason why K & S will never be able to play with the big boys internationally is because of its weak institutional client base and the inability of Atlanta to share the pie. Look, it's the dominant Atlanta firm, but that means nothing outside of Atlanta.

Hays and gang can talk all they want about collegiality and the old glory days, but the truth is the firm is now a cut throat every-partner -or-himself-or-herself place. The institutional client relationships are firmly held in the hands of the old Atlanta boys. Few partners outside Atlanta get to benefit from the institutional relationships. Well, unless you were an Atlanta stalwart in the first place. So much for working across offices. New partners are expected to bring in their own work.

Morale is low across the board because the associates all know the firm would rather hire lateral partners than grow organically. Also, if you are a minority, good luck with trying to make it in that white frathouse/sorority culture.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 1:04 PM

The reason why K & S will never be able to play with the big boys internationally is because of its weak institutional client base and the inability of Atlanta to share the pie. Look, it's the dominant Atlanta firm, but that means nothing outside of Atlanta.

Hays and gang can talk all they want about collegiality and the old glory days, but the truth is the firm is now a cut throat every-partner -or-himself-or-herself place. The institutional client relationships are firmly held in the hands of the old Atlanta boys. Few partners outside Atlanta get to benefit from the institutional relationships. Well, unless you were an Atlanta stalwart in the first place. So much for working across offices. New partners are expected to bring in their own work.

Morale is low across the board because the associates all know the firm would rather hire lateral partners than grow organically. Also, if you are a minority, good luck with trying to make it in that white frathouse/sorority culture.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 1:06 PM

99 - which office were you at?

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 1:49 PM

Lat, get it right. TPW has been closing its satellite offices down to do the K&S deal and because their bank lenders want it done; their satellite offices were tiny, in the middle of nowhere and loss leaders (Summit, NJ? White Plains?-those are rest stops not major cities for law firms) . Anybody "high profile" and with a brain left the HMS TPW Titanic a while ago...

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, December 12, 2008 1:49 PM

Lat, get it right. TPW has been closing its satellite offices down to do the K&S deal and because their bank lenders want it done; their satellite offices were tiny, in the middle of nowhere and loss leaders (Summit, NJ? White Plains?-those are rest stops not major cities for law firms) . Anybody "high profile" and with a brain left the HMS TPW Titanic a while ago...

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, December 13, 2008 9:13 AM

King & Spalding NY is a joke. I worked there for 2 years, and can tell stories. The MP Bob Perry (nice guy) is pretty soft and the NY office is held up by strings that are primarily controlled by the Atlanta office. If you are talking about technology, they are in the stone age. With that said, the firm has alot of old money, so its in decent shape, but I know theyve taken alot of hits. TPW had a very flawed business plan, so it leaves one to wonder, if 0+0 could ever =1

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, December 14, 2008 8:09 AM

hey 102 - great post

dead on

K&S is a revolving door and a hell hole

When I left, a partner threatended to "shoot me" if I said anything bad about the firm - same partner knew all of the dirst and referred to the Atlanta office as "talking down to all of their local clients" and "the folks in Atlanta drinking the Kool-Aid"

I knew one partner there who asked staff people to spy on other partners

It is a pathetic firm

As for Robert Hays, he needs to grow some hair - the bald-headed thing doesn't work on a white man at all - and the cowboy boots don't work either

One of the most bizarre K&S stories was the 9 month pregnanat staff person who was interrogated by a practice group leader to try and get dirt on another partner - the preganant woman stopped the interrogation and walked out to her credit

Working there is like being Michael Clayton 24/7

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, December 14, 2008 8:24 AM

107 - do spell check

otherwise you are dead on

they also have a well-deserved reputation for hiring lateral partners so they can steal clients

if i was a thatcherite, i would be real careful

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 6:15 AM

I too used to work at this hellhole. They're cheap with everything. A lot of empty rhetoric about work excellence and commitment to professionalism, but seriously the only way to get ahead at this place is to kiss ass. And the right ass at that. But this strategy only works if you are one of the good 'ol boys or girls. Who can coast through. If you're not connected or have the right skin color, then you have to have sterling academic achievements, be billing like a crazy person and generally be so much better that they rely on you for your work and/or clients.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 6:22 AM

i was in their corporate department. when i heard coca-cola gave that huge deal to skadden (when it's supposedly one of the firm's institutional clients), i made up my mind to leave. and i did. within 2 months.

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 7:09 AM

rumor mill says that K&S voted down acquisition last week -- tactic to acquire even less than the 100 total?

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 8:21 AM

What happens to summer associates that had offers from TPW? Whether the deal goes through or not, won't summer offers be rescinded? Is it customary to give those guys severance? Can't imagine any acquiring firm would want inexperienced, untrained newbies, esp. with well-honed terrified little drone bees more than willing.

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 11:23 AM

thatcherites - be careful

i would bet that king and spalding is researching to see what client they can steal - they will then bring you in and do everything they can to slander you to the client

i have seen it in action

it is a firm of sociopaths

i know people who were threatened with physical harm when they were in the process of leaving

i know people who were victims of violence from people at the firm

i know a policeman - who worked part-time for the firm - who told me "... that doesn't supprise me ..." when told that someone suspected a partner of vandalizing another partner's car in the firm parking garage

it is a dangerous place to work

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 12:50 PM

113 (I guess you are also 93), you should stop making these ridiculous statements about K & S being a "firm of sociopaths." I used to work there, and while there are many problems with the firm and particularly with some of the individuals there, these are not particular to K & S. However, I do agree with you 113, that some of the senior people at the firm seem to take departures personally and generally can't accept that people move because there's nothing in the place for them.

102 hit it well on the head. Many partners and associates have left the firm precisely because of those issues.

Post Your Comment