Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Layoff Watch: Drinker Biddle Could Be Letting People Go

drinker biddle logo.jpgWe received multiple reports this morning that Drinker Biddle & Reath let go of approximately 20 people, all on Friday. Tipsters reported the information this morning, but a morning commenter had the best line:

Yes it’s true about DBR - on Friday afternoon. No stealth - they came around to every office - told everyone it was economy based.

Other tipsters confirmed that the dismissals were based on the economy and not associate performance. The firm would not confirm or deny the reports, as a matter of policy.

If true, axing people 13 days before Christmas is a sad sign of the times. Let’s hope that firms finish all of their 2008 associate cuts by the end of this week. Surely feelings and families should take precedence over burying layoff news in the holiday news cycle.

And, as always, good luck to all the former Drinker Biddle employees.

Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of law firm layoffs

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:19 PM

Drinker to merge with Thelen.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:19 PM

first

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:19 PM

TTThird

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:21 PM

Seriously, misspelling the firm's name in the title of the article. Poor form, Elie. Poor form.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:21 PM

once again, for your viewing pleasure...
http://www.ldlkm.com/attorneys/staff_partner_marcus_millet.asp

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:21 PM

once again, for your viewing pleasure...
http://www.ldlkm.com/attorneys/staff_partner_marcus_millet.asp

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:22 PM

Jefferson and Mayham letting people go!

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:22 PM

I wish Drinker could merge with Thelen. Seriously. Better yet, I wish Drinker could merge with Brown Raysman. Those were the good old days :(

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:23 PM

5-6:

Now THAT is a connoisseur, an afficianado, of the art of the mustache ride. No?

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:23 PM

Drinker Bidde? Suck it, MysTTTal.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:27 PM

I wish Stephen A Smith was reporting these layoffs.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:28 PM

I would rather nail a Sheep than work at Drinker Bidde.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:34 PM

First to wonder about the Count's conspicuous absence.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:42 PM

What's the obsession with Lerner David? Had a callback there, they seemed like nice people. Accepted offer in the city instead.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:42 PM

Damn, damn, damn!

Esther Rolle

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:44 PM

Nice mustacheo. sort of like the Beastie Boys.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:46 PM

14

seemed like nice people is right. accepting offer in the city was a smart move.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:54 PM

Any news of any other New Jersey firms laying off?

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:57 PM

I have no opinion on Drinker Biddle.

Ed Stimes

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:57 PM

18 - Non-BigLaw Jersey firms do things like no-offer summers and lay off people all the time.

I don't think any of the BigLaw firms that have a presence in the state (Greenberg Traurig, Latham) have gone through any layoffs at this time, at least in their Jersey offices. Even the Drinker layoffs are probably not in NJ.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 3:59 PM

What offices? Any news as to whether this affects the DC office?

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:00 PM

What city were the layoffs in?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:02 PM

Which office? What kind of reporTTTing is this?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:02 PM

21 - Someone in the WolfBlock post said Phila, Princeton and Florham Park for DBR.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:03 PM

Any news on Cole Schotz? Have they had lay offs?

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:03 PM

You NJ folk can rest easy. All the layoffs were in the Bratislava office.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:05 PM

layoffs? you wanna talk about layoff? layoffs?

seriously, are firms really laying people off? i had no clue

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:08 PM

layoffs? you wanna talk about layoff? layoffs?

seriously, are firms really laying people off? i had no clue

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:09 PM

12

You would probably rather nail a sheep than do most anything

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:11 PM

practice groups?

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:11 PM

I meant Phila, Chicago and Princeton for DBR.

VTY,
24

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:23 PM

According to that same post, most of the layoffs were corporate. No major NJ firms have had widespread layoffs, nor have the NJ offices of national/regional firms. This market is like terrorism, your safer in the suburbs.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:31 PM

chicago layoffs

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:37 PM

Any idea who they cut? What level/practice groups?

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:45 PM

5 & 6 - totally looks like Howard Stern

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 4:57 PM

I wish they would merge with Weiner & Cox to form Weiner & Cox Biddle Drinker

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:09 PM

Are any firms laying off first year associates?

--First year associate

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:12 PM

Is this based on some comment in the Wolf Block post or is there substance to this?

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:14 PM

What about summer associates who worked at Drinker last summer? Should they be worried? Do firms ever rescind offers to incoming first years?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:15 PM

this is patently false.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:20 PM

I know someone who works at one of Drinker's NJ offices, and she tells me that no one from her office was let go and there have been no rumors/discussions re: same.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:20 PM

I know someone who works at one of Drinker's NJ offices, and she tells me that no one from her office was let go and there have been no rumors/discussions re: same.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:20 PM

I know someone who works at one of Drinker's NJ offices, and she tells me that no one from her office was let go and there have been no rumors/discussions re: same.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:26 PM

I work at Drinker in New Jersey and have heard no rumors regarding any layoffs.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:34 PM

SKADDEN TO 190!!!!!!

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:36 PM

I'm in Drinker's Chicago office and the rumors are rampant here. I guess NJ got a reprieve.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:37 PM

I'm in Drinker's Chicago office and the rumors are rampant here. I guess NJ got a reprieve.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:38 PM

I'm at Drinker- Hackensack, and I just received a mustache ride!

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:41 PM

Large downtown law firm just canned 20 to 30 contract attorneys. No one received severance pay or a Christmas/Hanukkah/Ramadan/Kwanza/Festivus bonus.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:44 PM

What is impressive about this is how quite management has kept this internally (NJ offices). DBR Philly here and THIS IS TRUE.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:45 PM

First year- White & Case has laid off First years

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:53 PM

2 associates laid off in chicago

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:55 PM

Yes, 25. They are in talks with Drinker to merge. The new firm is to be called Drinker Schotz.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 5:59 PM

any layoffs in NJ????

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 6:00 PM

They could merge with Luce Forward and rename the firm Luce Drinker.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 6:16 PM

dick move laying off associates 12 days before christmas

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 6:27 PM

Drinker Biddle is so stingy it pretended to lose my NALP reimbursement form, and it took much effort on my part to get the measely check.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 6:33 PM

Any more info about layoffs at Dick Move?

DM First Year

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 7:53 PM

Drinker Princeton was hit hardest, the word was 10 associates from that relatively small office. 5 associates from Drinker Philly (Corporate) were let go--mostly 2nd-5th years, but I have incomplete data outside Philly on seniority. The rest were in Chicago or Florham Park. Word is that there are no more layoffs planned, but who knows.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 8:09 PM

15 - that shit was hilarious. Nice old school reference.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 9:21 PM

There are only about 10 associates in the entire princeton office. So that's clearly wrong. Moreover, my sister works at that office, and she tells me that no associates were let go.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 9:48 PM

FYI, massive layoffs at MWE in all offices.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, December 15, 2008 10:18 PM

What about summer associates who worked at Drinker last summer? Should they be worried? Do firms ever rescind offers to incoming first years?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 12:02 AM

Did they provide any severance package to the associates?

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 8:18 AM

DLA Piper would've offered the associates miniscule equity partnership for a mere $150,000 capital contribution....then layed them off in February and returned capital in five installments over the next ten years, per the partnership agreement. Drinker Fiddle About's management lacks imagination/creativity.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 9:55 AM

Apparently some Drinker equity partners were de-equitized (now non-equity partners). So no DLA Piper buy-in here.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:00 AM

There is some major misinformation here regarding Drinker.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:23 AM

I heard they are considering a merger with Weiner & Cox, to form Weiner & Cox Biddle Drinker.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:24 AM

I heard they are considering a merger with Weiner & Cox, to form Weiner & Cox Biddle Drinker.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:25 AM

I heard they are considering a merger with Weiner & Cox, to form Weiner & Cox Biddle Drinker.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1:18 PM

61- ther are about 60 in Princeton. Just look at the web.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:07 PM

71 -- 60 associates in the princeton office?? Check the website. I counted 19, which is much closer to 10 than 60, if you weren't a math major.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:47 PM

not sure what site you checked but I just checked again and still got over 50 attorneys.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:55 PM

yes about 50 attorneys, but only 19 associates. Originally, I was replying to 59's post re: 10 associates being fired at the Princeton office and how this has to be greatly overstated since there are 10 (actually 19) associates in the entire office.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 3:06 PM

I agree with that. I heard 2 associates gone in Princeton and can only confirm 1.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:06 PM

Florham Park layoffs?

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, December 17, 2008 10:18 AM

There were layoffs in Philadelphia, Princeton and Chicago only. Some of my friends at the firm were let go. What is really upsetting is that the Corporate group hired 6 laterals in these offices and laid off the same number of associates in these offices.

Corporate thought it was doing great (and it was) up until September. The mighty ego of partners to think they could hire when everyone else was letting go. Good luck to all who were let go.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, December 17, 2008 5:58 PM

Without question, Drinker let people go, including people in Princeton, Philly and Chicago. Corporate was affected. A damn shame!! What a disgrace.

avatar
79 Posted by mdaniels19 | Permalink Tuesday, May 12, 2009 7:57 AM

I think the merge would help to save jobs because there are more resources between two companies

avatar
80 Posted by mdaniels19 | Permalink Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:22 AM

the law allows companies to combine as long as a reasonable contract is drawn up. It would be a corporation business and consists of more than one owner and a board of directors. This means it will be double taxation.

avatar
81 Posted by mdaniels19 | Permalink Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:22 AM

the law allows companies to combine as long as a reasonable contract is drawn up. It would be a corporation business and consists of more than one owner and a board of directors. This means it will be double taxation.

avatar
82 Posted by mdaniels19 | Permalink Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:23 AM

the law allows companies to combine as long as a reasonable contract is drawn up. It would be a corporation business and consists of more than one owner and a board of directors. This means it will be double taxation.

Post Your Comment