Nationwide Layoff Watch: I’m Shipping Up To Boston
First, some good news for Boston based attorneys. Ropes & Gray has joined the growing list of firms not freezing associate salaries. The firm sent out a whole memo about it and everything:
We are pleased to announce that base compensation for partnership-track associates in 2009 will reflect normal seniority increases as follows
But while things look wicked awesome at Ropes, other Beantown firms are feeling the economic pinch. We received word today that Foley & Hoag laid off 32 people. We understand that the breakdown was 17 associates and 15 staff.
The firm confirmed the news in an email that was sent to ATL as well as all of the firm’s associates:
These current economic conditions have led to over-capacity among our lawyers and staff. After considering all our options, the Firm reluctantly concluded that it needed to reduce its headcount in lawyers and staff by approximately 6%. We have contacted this morning individually all the lawyers and staff who are being asked to leave the firm.
After the jump, tipsters weigh in and we post the full Foley statement.
According to the firm, attorneys and staff were informed this morning. But some tipsters noted that staffers were informed a little differently than associates:
The associates were called into a conference room while the staff were given the tap on the shoulder.
But, in their statement Foley did say nice things about all of their departed employees. Read the full statement below and see if you agree with one tipster who opines:
The memo seemed pretty mean, didn’t it? “We’re making a profit but want to throw everyone out in the snow just in case?”
FOLEY HOAG — STATEMENT — REDUCTION IN FORCE
As many of you know, this has been a difficult day at the Firm.
Going into 2009, we have reviewed our operations against current and anticipated market conditions. While the Firm had a strong 2008 financially following a successful 2007, we are working to implement prudent measures to ensure the continued strength of the Firm as it navigates through a severe global economic downturn in 2009.
These current economic conditions have led to over-capacity among our lawyers and staff. After considering all our options, the Firm reluctantly concluded that it needed to reduce its headcount in lawyers and staff by approximately 6%. We have contacted this morning individually all the lawyers and staff who are being asked to leave the firm. Those affected by this decision are all high quality professionals who have made valuable contributions to the Firm. We intend to work with these individuals to help them find new employment. They will each receive access to outplacement services and other benefits and a severance package. While a layoff is a difficult step to take, we believe it is an essential step to ensure the Firm’s ability to continue to deliver efficient and high quality service to its clients in the face of challenging economic times. We have no additional plans for any further reductions in headcount.
Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of law firm layoffs




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
Figgiti FIRST!
Captain FIRST!
first
Here comes the Boston bloodbath.
i assume you're being shipped BULK FREIGHT, mysTTTal
Too unrelated to Cahill layoffs. Didn't read.
BITCH SPREAD THE CREAMY WHITE BUTTCHEEKS SO I CAN SMELL THE JUICY INSIDES!!!
4. That's the best fat joke in months. Well done. Now go away before I'm forced to eat you.
--Elie
morgan lewis will freeze salaries for associates
Where's Count Layoffula when you need him?
And what's going on at Goodwin Procter?
BITCH SPREAD THE BUTTCHEEKS SO I CAN SMELLS DAH JUICY INSIDES!
#3's comment would have been better had they made a reference to the "Boston Massacre." Just saying. A little history makes for some better wit.
P.S. What about Cahill?
Mayer just laid off Brown.
Has any woman ever actually spread her buttcheeks so a man could smell?
Kudos to you 12 - involuntary laughter is a good thing.
@ 13 -- areyou're a virgin aren't you?
9 - this is why everyone who voted for layoffula sucks. that twatwaffle got the (undeserved) glory, then bounced when it was time to get it up and deliver. fuck you layoffula. fraternity lothario 4 eva.
Cahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffsCahill layoffs
and
Cahill layoffs
Goodwin and Wilmer Boston are going to have to keep salaries liquid then. Woo!
Wilmer dropped salaries to 2002 levels
18: Woo! is right... until they start non-offering half of their bloated summer classes.
20 - titcr
13:
I'm with you. Eeeewwww.
15:
You're a freak.
4- are you covered in powdered sugar? If you are - RUN!
any word on how junior/senior the associates were?
I SAID WILL YOU BLOW ME WHERE THE PAMPERS IS!
Coke on Wednesday makes these comments more funnier.
FACT: Goodwin Procter associates are being stealthily laid off in Boston.
24 - Do you mean the laid off Cahill associates?
THE LIST: This list does not include "redeployments," mergers, staff, or staff attorneys.
Announced | Firm | Location | Total | "Review-Based"? | Acknowledged?
1/11/2007 Kenyon & Kenyon US 16 No Yes
10/1/2007 Thacher Proffitt & Wood US 24 No Yes
10/17/2007 Kirkland & Ellis Chicago 6 to 8 Yes No
1/10/2008 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft Charlotte 9 No Yes
1/10/2008 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft NYC 26 No Yes
2/14/2008 Winstead PC Dallas ~3 Yes Yes
2/29/2008 Dechert US 13 No Yes
3/20/2008 Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner US 26 No Yes
4/4/2008 Dewey & LeBoeuf Jacksonville 10 No Yes
4/4/2008 Dewey & LeBoeuf Hartford 22 No Yes
4/4/2008 Dewey & LeBoeuf Austin 16 No Yes
4/25/2008 Sutherland Asbill & Brennan Atlanta 8 Mix Yes
4/25/2008 Sutherland Asbill & Brennan DC <7 Mix Yes
5/12/2008 Paul Hastings US 22 Yes Yes
5/28/2008 Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal US 37 No Yes
6/5/2008 Blank Rome Philadelphia 6 Yes Yes
6/5/2008 Blank Rome NYC 2 Yes Yes
6/5/2008 Blank Rome DC 1 Yes Yes
6/11/2008 Thacher Proffitt & Wood US 36 No Yes
6/23/2008 Powell Goldstein US <10 No Yes
7/1/2008 Patton Boggs Dallas 4 Yes Yes
7/1/2008 Patton Boggs US 5 Yes Yes
7/14/2008 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LA, SF, San Diego 15 Unk No
7/16/2008 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman East Coast <10 Unk No
7/30/2008 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft NYC, Charlotte, London, DC 96 No Yes
8/4/2008 DLA Piper London 1 No Yes
8/6/2008 Sullivan & Worcester Boston & NY 7 Yes No
8/12/2008 Simpson Thacher & Bartlett global 30 Yes No
8/21/2008 Morgan & Finnegan NYC ~4 No Yes
9/22/2008 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer unknown <5 No Yes
9/25/2008 Heller Ehrman US ~600? No Yes
10/2/2008 Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal US 25 No Yes
10/14/2008 Clifford Chance NYC & DC 20 No Yes
10/20/2008 Dewey & LeBoeuf Charlotte 8 No Yes
10/20/2008 Katten Muchin Rosenman US 21 No Yes
10/21/2008 Jenner & Block US 10 No Yes
10/22/2008 Dechert US 10 to 30 Yes No
10/23/2008 O'Melveny & Myers LA 5 Yes Yes
10/27/2008 White & Case Milan 14 No Yes
10/28/2008 Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner US ~500? No Yes
10/30/2008 Bell Boyd & Lloyd Chicago 10 No Yes
11/3/2008 McKee Nelson NYC 13 No Yes
11/3/2008 McKee Nelson DC 4 No Yes
11/11/2008 Loeb & Loeb US 8 Yes Yes
11/11/2008 White & Case US, London 70 No Yes
11/12/2008 Moore Van Allen Charlotte 20 No Yes
11/13/2008 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe US 40 No Yes
11/14/2008 Greenberg Traurig NYC unk No No
11/19/2008 Brown Rudnick US 20 No Yes
11/20/2008 Mayer Brown US 33 No Yes
11/20/2008 Squire Sanders US <30 Yes Yes
11/21/2008 Dewey & LeBoeuf NYC 5 to 11 Unk No
11/21/2008 Fried Frank US 15 Yes No
12/1/2008 Fried Frank US 15 Yes No
12/3/2008 Reed Smith UK 11 No Yes
12/4/2008 Proskauer Rose US 35 No Yes
12/4/2008 Dewey & LeBoeuf NY 11 No Yes
12/4/2008 Dewey & LeBoeuf LA 1 No Yes
12/5/2008 Seyfarth Shaw US 30 No Yes
12/10/2008 Pircher Nichols & Meeks LA, Chicago 8 No Yes
12/10/2008 Howrey Unk ~10 Yes Yes
12/15/2008 Wolf Block US 15 No Yes
12/15/2008 Drinker Biddle US 20 No No
12/17/2008 Gunderson Dettmer US Unk Yes No
1/7/2009 Kirkland & Ellis Chicago 15-25 Yes No
1/7/2009 Dickstein Shapiro NYC & DC 10 No Yes
1/8/2009 Parker Poe NC/SC 13 No Yes
1/8/2009 Baker & McKenzie NYC 6 No Yes
1/8/2009 Clifford Chance London ~80 No Yes
1/8/2009 Cahill Gordon Unk Unk Unk No
1/9/2009 Wildman Harrold Chicago 10 Yes Yes
1/9/2009 Loeb & Loeb US 4 Unk No
1/13/2009 Dewey & LeBoeuf LA 8 Unk Yes
1/14/2009 Foley & Hoag Boston 17 No Yes
I like to sneak up behind my secretary, gently lay my balls on her shoulder and see how long they will rest there before she notices. Makes Wed fun.
FACT: So have Sullivan & Worcester associates with more on the way next month.
People's lives are impacted here, have a little respect.
Good for Ropes. Any associates there who can comment on how things are looking in Boston? Are things relatively busy at Ropes?
29 - You mentioned something about Cahill layoffs, but said the details are "unknown." Could you give us some more information, please?
23 -
i was, but i just spent the last hour having a CWT NY '05 female associate lick every last sweet, sticky morsel off my body. however, i do appreciate your concern.
- 4
Wait, so does ANYBODY have any details on layoffs at Cahill? Why hasn't ATL covered this yet?
25: Nice PCU reference from the dude who went on to write and direct "Swingers." (Sadly, I have forgotten his name. I think he also directed "Elf," though.)
umm 30, that is against every law of decency. No wonder women on this site are angry.
There are two kinds of people: sheep and sharks. Anyone who's a sheep is fired. Who's a sheep?
34,
If you know anything more about the Cahill layoffs, maybe I can change some things from unknown.
29.
39 is going to be the next great board shtick.
FACT: So have Sullivan & Worcester associates with more on the way next month.
34,
If you know anything more about the Cahill layoffs, maybe I can change some things from unknown.
-29
37--Jon Favreau. "Gutter" in terms of PCU's weltanschauung.
I would never nail a shark.
I just ordered a Slap Chop on TV.
suck it..
More detail on Goodwin?
The sharks have parity with the sheep these days.
with all the SHEEP talk on this blog, i'm surprised it took this long for someone to break out the futurama reference
Jones Day Chicago cuts summer program to 10 weeks. This has been confirmed by multiple sources. Please write something up about which firms are doing this.
SERIOUS QUESTION: Anybody have news of firms revoking offers to 3L's? Other than, of course, Thelen and Heller and whatnot.
Any firm that DOES NOT reduce its summer program to 10 weeks is a firm that completely lacks common sense. Skadden's summer program has been 10 weeks for years. An easy way to reduce summer associate salaries - which are dead weight - by 1/6.
Ropes' and Goodwin's summer classes in Boston were bloated last year ( > 100), but not Wilmer ( ~ 35).
Alston & Bird layoffs in all offices. So far it's about 10 confirmed including several 1st years. Total radio silence from management like nothing is happening. I learned when I was kid that if I cover my eyes, i'm still not invisible.
Elie- must we do your job for you?
From what I've heard Goodwin has let go about 30 lawyers in Boston. They are giving the departed three months severance or allowing them to stay with the firm for three more months. They have also hired some kind of job placement consultant. It started a week or so before Thanksgiving and I believe it is still ongoing.
Goodwin insists its all performance based.
13,
I know I like my women to spread their butt cheeks and I know I'm not alone, judging from the comments here.
Tip -- wipe and wash well before dates.
Any news about salaries at Mintz?
From what I've heard Goodwin has let go about 30 lawyers in Boston. They are giving the departed three months severance or allowing them to stay with the firm for three more months. They have also hired some kind of job placement consultant. It started a week or so before Thanksgiving and I believe it is still ongoing.
Goodwin insists its all performance based.
THIRTY TWO! THIRTY TWO LAYOFFS!! AH AH AH!!!!!
My apologies for not being around very much to COUNT the layoffs! I have been preoccupied COUNTing my billable hours for 2009. ONE! ONE BILLABLE HOUR!! AH AH AH AH AH!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Count Layoffula
59 AKA Count Layoffula
If you have only one billable hour thus far in 2009, I would start counting yourself among the ranks of the unemployed.
55- any 1Ls?
60--
The Count was billing 1.0 for couting the 32 layoffs. Duh!
61, are you fucking retarded?
Foley's layoffs were mostly second and third year associates.
55 - junior/senior?
62
Learn to fucking read, asshat.
"I have been preoccupied COUNTing my billable hours for 2009."
NOTHING about billing one hour for counting the 32 layoffs.
Aggressive stupidity much?
55- any 1Ls?
as an incoming associate at goodwin, i sure as hell hope that those layoffs really were "performance based"
summer class of 90+ = not good in a recession
Not really sure about class years at Goodwin. My info comes from a friend who was a third year that got canned a few weeks ago.
68 - I dont think 30 associates in Boston can really be purely performance based. But thats just my opinion...
-55
What about the RUMORS?
What about the RUMORS?
It's hard to perform when there's no work, whether it be in Boston, or NYC, or LA.
Correction --
It's hard to perform when there's no work, whether it be in Boston, or NYC, or LA, or Sesame Street.
To wit -- Count Layoffula who, it appears, will be the victim of the layoffs.
The layoffs at Goodwin are being called performance-based by the powers that be, but everyone I've heard of had great performance reviews up until the point that they heard they got the ax.
So yeah, Goodwin is shady.
66--
Not nearly as much as you are aggressively douche-y.
Besides, what else would the Count bill for? It's not like he's a lawyer--everyone knows that if lawyers could do math, they'd have gone to business school instead.
75,
I'd rather be aggressively douche-y rather than just plain aggressively stupid, as you appear to be.
Fat, stupid, and lazy is no way to go through life, son.
Goodwin has been shady for years. They did the same "performance based" layoffs in 2002 and 2003 when the dot.com bublle burst. They assign work to only their chosen few and then boot out the rest when given the opportunity.
Summer class of 90+ is bad news.
75, lawyers that can do math become patent attorneys
Ropes is definitly getting some love on ATL today. Give credit where credit is due.
STEALTHY RUMORS?
More info on the Foley layoffs, please (btw, it is "Foley Hoag," no "&") -- any pattern as to who was laid off? Corporate, litigation?
Former Thelen and current Orrick partner The Glass Cock here, coming out of retirement to call Layoffula a disloyal fool ass bitch made punk who should have never won the commenter of the year award.
Glass Cock, OUT
More info on Alston & Bird? Attorneys, staff?
More info on Alston & Bird? Attorneys, staff?
Goodwin bonus or freeze info?
Foley Hoag is not "Foley" -- Foley & Lardner is known as "Foley" -- way to mix the two up, Elie.
has wilmer announced raises or bonuses?
Incorrect 87 -- Foley Hoag is "Foley." Actually won a lawsuit against Foley & Lardner declaring as much...
57 - Salaries are frozen at Mintz. They had the "decency" to tell associates on the eve of the first payday of 2009 without any prior warning.
89,
Go to http://www.foley.com. See what comes up.
There are no layoffs in Texas. Only northeast elites get laid off. Plus the cost of living is way lower here.
Were Goodwin layoffs of business law associates because I have not heard of any litigation associates being pushed out the door in the past few months?
Foley Hoag is much smaller in Goodwin/Ropes/Wilmer etc. There's little comparison.
Were Goodwin layoffs of business law associates because I have not heard of any litigation associates being pushed out the door in the past few months?
Foley Hoag is much smaller in Goodwin/Ropes/Wilmer etc. There's little comparison.
Just like the past recession, Mintz ahead of the curve again!
89,
You don't know what you are talking about.
http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20061003005611&newsLang=en
89/97,
Notice that this was a "settlement agreement." Foley Hoag did not "win" any lawsuit. Perhaps you were misled by the spin of the Foley Hoag press release that you posted in #97. Go to foley.com. Better yet, ask practitioners in any city besides Boston what firm "Foley" refers to.