Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Pay Freeze Watch: Perkins Coie And Fulbright Freeze, Schulte Does Not

pay freeze salary freeze pay cut law firm.jpgAfter saying nice things about top Texas firms yesterday, our inbox was flooded today with news of a salary freeze at Fulbright & Jaworski.

As we understand it, the firm is only freezing salaries through the first quarter of 2009, so it’s a Slurpee freeze.

So much for Texas being the beacon of hope for the legal industry.

But, perhaps more surprisingly, Perkins Coie is also freezing salaries:

The 2009 economic picture remains extremely uncertain. Although we continue to have no debt and the firm is in excellent financial shape, we have determined to take a number of significant steps to ensure the firm’s financial health in 2009 for the benefit of all personnel.

The firm’s budget contemplates approximately a 10% reduction in average partner income in 2009, and partner draw percentages for January and February were significantly reduced in order to avoid any need to borrow funds. We have also frozen salaries for senior administrative staff who are evaluated on a calendar year basis. Most staff have salary adjustments on July 1 and no decision will be made on compensation adjustments applicable to them until that time.

We have also decided to hold associates at their current base salary levels. Associates will remain at their 2008 base salary for 2009, subject to two limited exceptions. Adjustments will be made to productivity build-ins for affected associates in the Bellevue, Seattle and Washington, DC offices, and changes will be made to address a few unique compensation arrangements previously scheduled for adjustment in 2009. New compensation memos will be distributed within the next few weeks.

I guess having partners that are tight with Obama isn’t enough to stave off a “solid ice” freeze. So much for unicorns.

But, after the jump, some positive news to report.

schulte logo.JPGYesterday, we mentioned that Schulte Roth could be freezing salaries. But today, Schulte made a very clear statement that they intend to stick with pay increases like most of the market.

Schulte Salary memo.JPG

This seems like a good time to mention the obvious. The salary freeze phenomenon is a trend being carried out by only a few firms. Skadden, Cravath, Cleary, Gibson, and countless other firms — literally more than we can credibly name without missing anybody — are not freezing salaries. Top firms are still raising salaries based on seniority.

We’ll keep up with the pay freeze watch, but the majority of Biglaw firms are acting like Schulte and paying class appropriate raises just like they’ve always done.

Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of salary freezes

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:03 PM

What ever happened to the law firm addict guy? I want updates on summer classes.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:04 PM

ninth

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:04 PM

None of these scum have earned a dollar of that money. What skills does a 1L bring to the client, again? Oh yeah, they don't know anything. Well worth charging the client +$200/hour. What a fraud.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:05 PM

Most firms will have frozen in a month. This is a Depression (thanks Bush - heckuva job!).

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:06 PM

Hi, can anybody here still afford a rub n tug a couple days per week? Does anyone know about any "Recession Specials" in the R&T space?

TIA

20

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:08 PM

"I guess having partners that are tight with Obama isn't enough to stave off a "solid ice" freeze."

*who*, not "that"

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:09 PM

Perkins has always wanted to play with the big boys. They are a big boy in Seattle, but clearly nowhere else. The Seattle office is still extremely busy, though, so I hope this "productivity" build-ins is worth it for those associates.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:09 PM

Add Mintz to the list.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:09 PM

Add Mintz to the list.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:10 PM

I blame all of the militant oneHOLE's screaming about death to the west.

oneHOLES=TTT

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:11 PM

everyone is busy, pulling the weight while the firms maintain their profits.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:15 PM

The Student Bar Association will be holding its annual symposium on "Bankruptcy in the Face in the Age of Corporate Layoffs." All are welcome to come and discounted admission will be given to those deemed bankrupt in the face.

-SBA President

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:16 PM

Shearman didn't freeze either.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:16 PM

Law School -- big mistake

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:16 PM

What about the Alston Bird layoffs? Any numbers, practice group or office details?

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:17 PM

What happened to all the smack talk from the folks in TTTexas?

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:18 PM

Vinson & Elkins and Baker Botts = No Freeze.

F&J out in the cold by itself....

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:20 PM

Greatest financial crisis in several generations and they're budgeting approximately a 10% decrease in partner income? Dang, sign me up for that gig.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:20 PM

Texas is tooBIG to freeze, stupid.

SMU RULES!

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:22 PM

Jeez ATL, why won't you give the people what they want:

Table, two columns. Raising, not raising. Lists of each.

The Readers.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:24 PM

"We'll keep up with the pay freeze watch, but the majority of Biglaw firms are acting like Schulte and paying class appropriate raises just like they've always done. "

Elie - please just make a chart of firms that have not frozen salaries. It is easy. Put a call out for emails and put one together. This is far more important than whatever stupid gossip you are following.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:24 PM

death to the infidels

really big oneHOLE

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:25 PM

If you're an associate at a frozen firm - did your billing rate advance?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:26 PM

confirmation that Shearman didn't freeze?

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:27 PM

Shearman increased salaries, and amended the bonus plan. Still no hours requirement, but not so lock step as it was in the past - top performers will get a lot more, underperformers a lot less, and a significant majority will get the same. They don't seem to be making the change in order to screw associates out of bonuses next year, but you never know. Someone else can forward you the memo...

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:27 PM

What's a SMU?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:28 PM

No freeze at W&C

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:33 PM

No surprise about Fulbright, really.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:33 PM

Any word about layoffs at Cahill?

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:33 PM

very curious to see the shearman bonus memo. someone please post.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:34 PM

i heard that firms are starting to fire all of their oneHoles.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:35 PM

Unproductive associates are the first to be fired.

Curiously, associates who post on ATL usually correlate to unproductive associates.

If you're reading this, you have a big red "X" marked on your forehead.

You're the weakest link. Buh-bye.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:36 PM

A&B layoffs in atlanta IP group!!!!! 10-15 lawyers including STUBS!!!!!

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:36 PM

27 -- third years are only at $180,000. You know of other years? Seems like the scale may be different now.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:39 PM

W&C - White & Case or Williams & Connolly?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:40 PM

yay schulte!

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:42 PM

34 - no we're not.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:44 PM

Baker Botts is not freezing salaries--just firing attorneys.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:44 PM

why is there NO news on boston firms?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:44 PM

24: yes. Way back in October 2008!!!!

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:45 PM

Making a list of firms that have frozen only encourages firms that are undecided. Please just highlight the ones who have not frozen.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:47 PM

White & Case has not frozen

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:48 PM

Did Milbank freeze? I am hearing mixed reports!

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:48 PM

Yes!
- Schulte Summer '09

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:50 PM

Yes!
- Schulte Summer '09

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:51 PM

23 --yes it did advance. That is the fishy part.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:52 PM

8/9 -- Mintz to the increase list? the freeze list?

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:55 PM

32 is the unintentional comedy scale winner of the week. No one can top that.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:56 PM

Kaye Scholer did not freeze.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:56 PM

Perkins Coie = oneHOLE

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:56 PM

Hmm, interesting point. I would also add.... Ducktales a woo oo!

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:09 PM

S&S didn't freeze. Thank you uncle Shearman.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:15 PM

Paul Roth is my hero!

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:22 PM

This is just a test - comments aren't working up at non-sequiturs

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:26 PM

23 and 46 -

You highlight a big problem with Fulbright's pay freeze. Associate pay is frozen, but rates go up at Fulbright. Partners make a little extra. Nice.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:26 PM

23 - yes, billing rates went up for all classes.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:27 PM

33-you are a douche rumor mill. IP? Come on, you can do better than that?

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:38 PM

55 - how is this a problem? Let me guess ... you went to law school straight from undergrad and still think it's all about you?

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:39 PM

A&B gave the bird to A.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:42 PM

38- what do you mean about Baker Botts firing attorneys? Is that true?

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:02 PM

ScTTTulte.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:06 PM

Can somebody tell me what's up with Sullivan & Worcester, NY and Boston. (Thanks, and great catches on the grammar.)

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:10 PM

60--I know for a fact that Baker Botts is conducting stealth lay-offs. Not in quantity, but it's happening.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:13 PM

63- do you know which offices? i heard that there were some stealth lay-offs in dallas, but assumed that dc/houston/nyc were still okay.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:24 PM

64 - i dont work at Baker Botts, but was told by someone who does that houston associates are being laid off

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:26 PM

Akin Gump announced a freeze yesterday as well.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:31 PM

re 66 - to clarify, Akin Gump announced it was freezing while studying whether to freeze. Its complicated.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:33 PM

I don't know why ATL itself refuses to provide this public service, but here is the list of firms that have raised salaries as normal in 2009:

Baker Botts
Bingham
Bracewell Giuliani
Cahill
Clifford Chance
Covington
Cravath
Crowell & Moring
Debevoise
Dechert
Dewey
Fish and Richardson
Fitzpatrick Cella
Gibson Dunn
Greenberg Traurig
Hogan and Hartson
Holland & Knight
Jones Day
Kaye Scholer
Kenyon & Kenyon
Kirkland
Linklaters
Morgan Lewis
Munger
O'Melveny
Paul Weiss
Schulte
Shearman
Skadden
Sullivan
Vinson Elkins
Weil
White & Case
Williams & Connolly
Willkie Farr

If you have additions, please add and repost the list.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:46 PM

non-freezing firms
http://abovethelaw.com/community/

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:00 PM

Any word on Wilson, Cooley, or Gunderson?

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:13 PM

70 --
Are those the names of associates laid off from Cahill?

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:15 PM

Hogan & Hartson froze.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:20 PM

Since we're on the subject of Schulte, someone previously made a comment that Schulte has only laid off 6 people because the attorney count went from 475 (in September) to 469 (as of January). (see http://abovethelaw.com/2009/01/biglaw_to_associates_surprise.php#comments ).

It's actually much more. If you check out NALP’s website, as of February 1, 2008, Schulte reported having 466 attorneys. On Schulte's website, today, there are 469 attorneys listed. If you subtract the 9 attorneys hired to open the new DC office, the 51 first years and the 10-20 lateral attorneys they've hired, that's a lot of people that have left the firm since February 2008. It could be attrition, stealth layoffs, or something else, but in any case, people are bailing from Schulte. Just saying ...

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:25 PM

4 you are clearly a young litigator. Go take econ 101 and then you won't have to look so stupid.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:31 PM

73 - and many more to come. Check the Schulte attorney chart in March to see the pre-holiday lay-offs reflected.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:59 PM

Any word on Fenwick?

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:07 PM

Fenwick announced a freeze last week.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:24 PM

I would take MLB off of that list - methinks a salary freeze will be announced tomorrow.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:01 PM

If MLB freezes salaries, the Yankees will be pissed for agreeing to pay Teixeira and Sabathia so much just before the freeze. Haha F the Yankees.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:24 PM

A&B IP layoffs! They pay ip a bit more here in Atlanta for IP. They are expensive and the market is not doing well here. There will also be a ton of non-ip layoffs anounced soon too.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:26 PM

Schulte's been laying off since the summer but have been doing it in little bits at a time so as not to cause headlines.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:30 PM

schulte lays people off every year - like many businesses, they tell the worst performing associates in each of the groups that they have a couple months to find new jobs. it has nothing to do with the economy.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:40 PM

68 - Take Morgan Lewis off the list. No raises or salaries announced yet. Everyone is expecting a freeze announcement tomorrow.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:23 PM

82 must be a schulte partner. so 60+ attorneys leaving the firm is business as usual, especially in a bad economy. get real! the numbers speak for themselves.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:24 PM

Can't believe MLB will let themselves fall behind Dechert, but then again, when have they ever been known to pay above market.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:31 PM

Any word on testa hurwitz? pay freeze, layoffs? thanks

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:35 PM

Akin didn't freeze. They merely said no decision was made if we get increases. Supposedly a decision will be made soon.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:37 PM

meine freunde artbeit fur perkins und ist kaput.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:38 PM

Don't worry guys. Superjew will stop these pay freezes with his massive money-sniffing nose.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:45 PM

ask schulte structured products dept. if it's business as usual.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:53 PM

Does SRZ even have a structured products group anymore? Thought the people in that group got transferred to other practice groups and when they couldn't cut it in the new group, got fired.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:58 PM

I'll say this because it's what all frozen associates are thinking - fuck Latham and where they came from. Fuck em in the ass.

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:13 AM

Fuck you 92, you money-grubbing little jew slut.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:38 AM

schulte's structured products group was largely disbanded, like at most firms. but most associates were transferred elsewhere. and there is no chance 60 associates have been laid off at schulte.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:44 AM

Any confirmation on Fulbright? I'll be shocked if they've really given up the fight. Then again I hear they're about to embark on a deadbeat partner pogrom that should shore things up by the end of the year.

Leon must be spinning in his grave.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:47 AM

Akin Gump did not officially freeze 66. I have it on good authority that because they are doing suprisingly well, they are going to raise!

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:22 AM

Proskauer Rose froze salaries. January 15th pay check came out at 2008 pay rate. No memo or other communication to associates.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:27 AM

23 - no, my firm froze salaries AND increased my rate $20. This is purely a money grab by the partners. These fuckers can't get enough clients to keep associates busy, they keep jacking rates on the clients they do have. This is a disaster waiting to happen...

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:30 AM

With multiple close friends at Baker Botts in Houston, I can confirm that they have been firing people based on alleged poor performance for almost all of 2008, and at rates far greater than normal years. Stealth lay offs, in other words, without a doubt.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:42 AM

Add Mintz Levin to the freeze list. Word is that they will reevaluate after quarter-end, whatever that means. They announced this with no previous warning on the eve of delivery of the first paychecks of 2009. Very lame.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:42 AM

Add Mintz Levin to the freeze list. Word is that they will reevaluate after quarter-end, whatever that means. They announced this with no previous warning on the eve of delivery of the first paychecks of 2009. Very lame.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:57 AM

whether stealth layoffs are occurring or not, its strange that a lot of people seem to be leaving schulte in a bad economy. does anyone know what groups have been affected the most?

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:03 AM

I heard from an associate at Shulte that the firm has been doing stealth layoffs; so the need to freeze wages was not there. Shulte claimed to be one of the biggest players in CDO legal work in the country. What happened to all of those associates once that work went away?

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:40 AM

i heard the layoffs have been acrross the board from real estate to lit. to IM. no group seems to be same.

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 11:14 AM

Greenberg Traurig NYC (no idea about White Plains) didn't freeze, but they did freeze some associates and went off lockstep for the rest. From what I've heard nobody more senior than a 2nd year got the class-appropriate raise.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 11:14 AM

ATL should put some pressure on schulte. it's been going on for 6 months, trying to pretend everything's ok.

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 11:26 AM

Ropes--not frozen. Just announced.

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 1:37 PM

Firms that do not freeze will lay off associates to make up the difference.

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:16 PM

28- why no surprise about Fulbright? Someone fill me in!

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 14, 2009 6:56 PM

Andrews Kurth Slurpee Freeze

Post Your Comment