Obama's Oath of Office, Take Two
The second time was a charm. Constitutional crisis averted.
Okay, it was hardly a “constitutional crisis.” But it was probably wise to take a mulligan on the oath, to avoid crackpot claims of illegitimacy. In the words of law professor Jonathan Turley, who recommended retaking the oath:
He should probably go ahead and take the oath again. If he doesn’t, there are going to be people who for the next four years are going to argue that he didn’t meet the constitutional standard. I don’t think it’s necessary, and it’s not a constitutional crisis. This is the chief justice’s version of a wardrobe malfunction.
Is The Future Of Law Distributed? Lessons From The Tech Adoption Curve
Turley seems to place blame for the screw-up on Chief Justice Roberts, as does CNN (see their headline below). Based on the results of yesterday’s reader poll, ATL readers concur.
Obama retakes oath of office after Roberts’ mistake [CNN]
Experts say Obama should retake the oath [San Francisco Chronicle]
Reading of the Presidential Oath, Take Two? [WSJ Law Blog]
Sponsored
Is The Future Of Law Distributed? Lessons From The Tech Adoption Curve
Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace
Navigating Financial Success by Avoiding Common Pitfalls and Maximizing Firm Performance
The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm
Earlier: Whoops. How does that Constitution go?