Add RSS RSS

Lawyer of the Day: A Prostitute-Loving Cravath Partner?

Cravath Swaine Moore LLP Above the Law blog.JPG[Ed. note: We mentioned this briefly in Morning Docket. But any story involving the words “Cravath partner” and “hookers” deserves its own post.]

The late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, aka the “D.C. Madam,” has a New York counterpart. From ABC News (via our sibling site, DealBreaker):

Wall street lawyers, investment bankers, CEOs and media executives often used corporate credit cards to pay for $2,000 an hour prostitutes, according to the madam who ran one of New York’s biggest and most expensive escort services until it was busted last year.

But prosecutors in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office chose not to pursue any of the corporate titans, says Kristin Davis, who pleaded guilty last year to charges of running a prostitution business that used more than a hundred women.

Presumably no relation to actress Kristin Davis, who played squeaky-clean Charlotte York on Sex and the City. The actress is a brunette; the madam is a blonde (of course).

Among the names ABC News was able to confirm on [Davis’s client] list:

* a partner at the Wall Street law firm of Cravath Swaine Moore, “looking for a party girl to come fully equipped,” [who] spent a total of $20,000.

Finally — a plausible explanation for those disappointing Cravath bonuses. The money went to a different set of hourly billers.

We appreciate the CSM partner’s demand that his high-class escort arrive “fully equipped.” Cravath lawyers believe in the importance of preparation. Whether dealing with depositions or dealmaking, their motto is: “Be prepared.”

Just like the Boy Scouts. If Boy Scouts blew twenty grand on whores.

Given the prestige (and profitability) of Cravath, some might find this news shocking. But those in the know realize that the white-shoe law firm has a long and august history…. of sexual deviance and prostitute patronizing.

Some historical context, after the jump.

A blast from the past, from a piece by James Stewart in the New Yorker (via the WSJ Law Blog):

“For the unspeakable facts were these: [Cravath partner] David Schwartz was murdered. He was killed in a sleazy Bronx motel. He was stabbed by a black eighteen-year-old male. He appears to have been leading a secret double life of clandestine and often dangerous sexual encounters. So far as can be determined, no one at Cravath and no one in his family had known”.

At the time of his death, Schwartz was married with three children, all in their twenties. He owned a Park Avenue duplex, a home in Westport, Conn., and earned $2.5 million per year. “Still,” Stewart wrote, “wealth and status couldn’t disguise Schwartz’s personal problems, which were mounting.”

That was from 1992. For a more recent example of a Cravath lawyer with issues, look to James Colliton. He’s the former Cravath tax attorney who “paid a woman so he could have sex with her two underage daughters,” according to the AP.

Compared to Jim Colliton, the Cravath partner who was a Kristin Davis customer was a saint. He sought sex from women, not girls. And, assuming the $20,000 wasn’t spread over a huge number of encounters, he didn’t pay a half-Skadden rate.

Eliot Spitzer In Good Company [DealBreaker]
CEOs, Bankers Used Corporate Credit Cards for Sex, Says New York Madam [ABC News]
Law Blog Flashback: The 1992 Death of Cravath Partner David Schwartz [WSJ Law Blog]

Earlier: An Update on Everyone’s Favorite Cravath Alum

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 11:55 AM

Bang me sideways. Billing rates are less.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 11:55 AM

Foist

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 11:56 AM

2'S ATTEMPT AT POSTING FIRST = EPIC FAIL
2'S CAJUN ACCENT = EPIC SUCCEED

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 11:56 AM

Ellie, I must say, you are quickly approaching funny. Yes, you set the bar very low, but you really are getting there. Kudos to you, and the other space aliens who came to Earth on your ship.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 11:57 AM

Alas, and then I see it was Lat who wrote it. Sigh.

- 4

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 11:59 AM

Thank you LAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:00 PM

what does "fully equipped" even mean?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:02 PM

fully equipped = me likey, me so horney, me sex you long time

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:03 PM

Are Cravath summers provided with firm-sponsored prostitutes or do we have to procure our own?

- Cravath 2L, sexual deviant and prostitute connoisseur

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:04 PM

8 nailed it.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:05 PM

Once again, I would love to climb that madam's Grand Tetons and plant my flag atop those majestic peaks!!

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:05 PM

my mother's second husband's brother in law (i know i know) was an ex-cravath man, he was also had the creepy grey complexion of death and was quite clearly a closeted pervert who likely burned small asian boys with cigarettes . . i think it comes with the territory. . . .

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:07 PM

fully equipped = transsexual.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:08 PM

fully equipped = "with coke"

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:11 PM

fully equipped means with coke. shoulda gone to cravath, those boys can party.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:12 PM

people who comment about epic anything are wow...dorks.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:27 PM

I thought fully equipped meant with a penis

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:30 PM

I thought fully equipped meant with a water bottle, small tent, two cans of baked beans, gore-tex sleeping bag, goggles, snorkle and a spatula.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:33 PM

Fully equipped = rubber fist

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:33 PM

$20K???

No wonder Cravath's managing partner wants to ditch the bill-by-the-hour model.

21 Posted by Bruce_Dickinson | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:35 PM

If she's FULLY EQUIPPED she brings her OWN COWBELL.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:35 PM

why buy the cow when you can get the milk for $20k?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:36 PM

Best. Law. Firm. Ever.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:40 PM

I bet those CSM attorneys know how to do their good turn daily like good Boy Scouts too.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:43 PM

$2,000 per hour??!? Ridic.

"This is the time to get rid of the billable hour," said Evan R. Chesler, presiding partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore in New York.

Need to use "flat fees for handling transactions and success fees for positive outcomes"

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/business/30hours.htm


avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:46 PM

it means she comes with a prophylactic - too shy to say the C-word.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:47 PM

What kind of GIRL comes "fully equipped?"

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:49 PM

I'm glad I work at the top 5 shop whose attorneys don't serially embarrass the firm.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:50 PM

14 nailed it on what "fully equipped" means.

The key to interpretation here is the fact that he requested a "party girl." The term "party" has a very particular meaning among loser NY wannabe bigshots who stick things up their nose.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:54 PM

Will this partner resign? Or will he remain at the firm, since the DA's office doesn't seem to have plans to prosecute?

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:54 PM

does anyone have the text of the original new yorker article? It's not available in any of the online databases

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:54 PM

What on god's green earth could be causing this ungodly amount of pressure on my sphincter place?

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:57 PM

14 + 29 = CSM alumni have a pretty good idea who said partner is

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:57 PM

Coke on a Friday, bitches!

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:58 PM

Cravath, Swaine, and Whores

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 12:59 PM

i think 26 is right its a a prophylactic

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:00 PM

35 Nailed it.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:01 PM

If the partner gives her legal advise while he has her does that offset her fees?

That would bring down her fees to the 1000-1200 range and that is much more reasonable.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:09 PM

Pour it on the models.

-Pop Bottles

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:09 PM

Would you believe that the Cravath Partner was brazen enough to bill a client for the matter as time spent "reviewing legal strategy"

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:10 PM

The James Colliton story is pretty amazing. Here is the New York Times write-up:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/03/nyregion/03plea.html

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:11 PM

Many years ago a partner at Cravath had an affair with an associate's wife.

What did Cravath do? .... Fire the associate.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:12 PM

Who was the Partner?

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:13 PM

"The actress is a brunette; the madam is a blonde (of course)."

What the fuck does this mean? Seriously?

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:15 PM

44 - It is a tongue-in-cheek reference to stereotypes about blondes.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:15 PM

the upside, 44, is that blondes really do have more fun. but they get taken less seriously and bring a similar attitude towards their career choices.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:17 PM

How much does Cravath fucking suck? Worst place on earth to work.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:29 PM

What an absolute piece if sh_t!!
Sex with minors!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/1003/nyregion03plea.html

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:32 PM

48, the same link was already posted by 41.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:35 PM

23, your emphasis is wrong.
should be best. law firm. ever.

whores are a good time.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:36 PM

21, wowy wow wow wow, that was funny.

Would anyone care to opine, from personal experience perhaps, as to the manner and form in which such charges appear on a corporate credit card statement?

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:43 PM

51 -- she undoubtedly had some sort of bland sounding corporation or LLC name that actually owned the business so that the credit card charge doesn't stand out from any others -- it probably sounds like a real estate company (525 E. 72d Corp).

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 1:52 PM

Off topic but there has been a lot of buzz at White & Case of another round of layoffs. Can anyone confirm?

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 2:04 PM

This does not surprise me. I got a distinctly sexist vibe when I interviewed with Cravath. I spent an entire day interviewing there and didn't encounter one female -- except for the floozy who guided me around from office to office, shaking her ass in her miniskirt as I followed behind.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 2:14 PM

I saw the video. This broad is NOT a natural blonde. If you were to pull down her panties, you'd be able to confirm that real quick.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 2:20 PM

54 - In Cravath's defense, some of their top lawyers and best partners are women (like Julie North and Faiza Saeed).

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 2:24 PM

i second/third the "party girl" + "fully equipped" = "with coke."

try reading casual encounters sometime. you can learn a lot.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 2:30 PM

54--Sorry about your tiny pink Cravath rejection, bro. You must not have been looking too hard if you didn't see any other women there.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 2:48 PM

21 is the new ATL commenter of the year. no need to hold a contest.

I NEED MORE COWBELL!

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 3:22 PM

Maybe that's where the bedbugs come from.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 3:28 PM

Cravath has bed bugs? Since when?

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 3:29 PM

Since early 2008 (at least):

http://www.abovethelaw.com/2008/03/cravaths_achilles_heel_bedbugs.php

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 3:38 PM

Will my Cravath administrative assistant come "fully equipped"?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 3:49 PM

Finally -- a plausible explanation for those disappointing Cravath bonuses. The money went to a different set of hourly billers.

Comedy gold.

*golf clap*

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 4:08 PM

43,

If you were asking 'which partner' in response to my post at 42, he's long not just retired, but also dead.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 4:17 PM

65 - no you douche bag, he was asking who the partner that hired the prostitutes was.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 4:18 PM

My favorite line was: "Just like the Boy Scouts. If Boy Scouts blew twenty grand on whores."

Nice work Lat.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 4:21 PM

65, if he's dead, then you can reveal his name. It is hornbook law that you can't libel the dead.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 5:12 PM

He is not the only BigLaw partner doing this.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 5:51 PM

18: that was funny.

58: 54 is obviously a chick, not a "bro." What guy would call a girl in a mini-skirt a "floozy"?

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 5:57 PM

Hehe I love the comments

Basically, this is the only way a socially awkward risk averse white-pasted Biglaw lacky can get some. The looks and game are not there so you have to resort to spending money. Next time you are jealous of all those Ivy leaguers who have spent their lives reading reading law review articles 24 hours a day with little exposure to the outside world., ask yourself if you want to fit into this profile.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 5:57 PM

Hehe I love the comments

Basically, this is the only way a socially awkward risk averse white-pasted Biglaw lacky can get some. The looks and game are not there so you have to resort to spending money. Next time you are jealous of all those Ivy leaguers who have spent their lives reading reading law review articles 24 hours a day with little exposure to the outside world., ask yourself if you want to fit into this profile.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 6:11 PM

To 71. Little is more entertaining than when some young JD gets it wrong and then also tries to drive the wrong point home. The ho's were for the clients!

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 7:16 PM

70: What person under the age of 80 even uses the word "floozy"?

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 7:16 PM

68,

This is 42, 65.

His name's not important - what's important is that it shows what a bunch of sh*ts they were - 1st blowing up a guy's personal life and then blowing up his career.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 7:23 PM

with all of the trouble with male partners at corporate law firms, the few women who exist in partnerships should get better bonuses...just for not being creepy rapists. is that too much to ask?

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 7:27 PM

69: "He is not the only BigLaw partner doing this. "

Way to state the obvious.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 8:24 PM

What a badass!

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 6, 2009 11:09 PM

Cravath is a cesspool of perversity. Trust me.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 7, 2009 12:12 AM

fully equipped means plenty of cocaine

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 7, 2009 12:37 AM

Am I the only one who thinks that both prostitution and cocaine should be legal? The man is an adult, and perfectly capable of handling his blow and his women.

What the hell is wrong with this country?!?!?

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 7, 2009 12:42 AM

Agreed 82, this country is getting soft.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 7, 2009 4:46 PM

First of all the 20/20 expose completely sucked, didnt say anything, and didnt name names.

Second of all, anyone who doesnt respect this man more for throwing 20Gs at a whore is a homosequal.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 7, 2009 6:36 PM

I'm a pretty sick guy too. How come I didn't get an offer from Cravath?

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 9, 2009 9:58 AM

Two Words: Denny Crane.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 20, 2009 12:07 PM

cravath what a shady place

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 5, 2009 5:41 PM

don't conflate sexual deviance and prostitute patronizing

Post Your Comment