Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Layoff Watch: Dechert Lets Go 10 Staff Attorneys

Dechert logo.JPGRemember when being a staff attorney was a viable option in the Biglaw universe? As we have previously reported, many big firms are laying off their staff attorneys. Today, Dechert adds its name to that growing trend.

Within the past few hours, we received a number of tips about staff attorney layoffs at Dechert.

Our sources tell us that Dechert will lay off 10 staff attorneys today. The number accounts for about 1/4th of the firm’s total staff attorney force.

Dechert laid off 19 attorneys two weeks ago, and 72 staffers back in December. So this news should not be particularly surprising.

But it is another indication that the economic crisis is taking a toll on all types of Biglaw employment.

Good luck to the 10 staff attorneys leaving Dechert.

Earlier: Staff Layoff Watch: A Roundup
Nationwide Layoff Watch: Dechert Cuts 19
Dechert Ices 72 Staff Positions

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:17 PM

1

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:18 PM

First

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:18 PM

boring....

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:19 PM

ouch. how does a staff atty get a new job? small firms will look at them and think "bottom of the biglaw totem pole.. worst of all worlds.. can't do anything big picture.. can just handle little pieces of glorified para work. big firms will just look at them and say "we're laying off regular associates left and right, what do we need you for?"

5 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:20 PM

The ship be sinking...

6 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:20 PM

The ship be sinking...

7 Posted by Summerstory | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:24 PM

Good luck to the recently unemployed. Everything is about the market.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:30 PM

LW is on the same company as Dechert. LOL

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:31 PM

the quarterpounder, it's cheese and beef and cheese and that's what's up.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:35 PM

Accoding to Decher's own website, they have 72 staff attorneys. 10 =! 1/4 of 72.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:35 PM

According to Decher's own website, they have 72 staff attorneys. 10 =! 1/4 of 72.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:36 PM

According to Dechert's own website, they have 72 staff attorneys. 10 =! 1/4 of 72.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:39 PM

6- at this point it's fair to say "The ship be sunk..."

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:41 PM

11/12, you're a moron. 10/72=.0138 whereas 1/4=0.25..thus, 10/72 =/=1/4.... instead of law school, perhaps you should have revisited elementary mathematics.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:42 PM

11/12, you're a moron. 10/72=0.138 whereas 1/4=0.25..thus, 10/72 =/=1/4.... instead of law school, perhaps you should have revisited elementary mathematics.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:42 PM

THE END IS NEAR!!! REPENT!!!

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:43 PM

Yeah, losing a staff attorney job at a shitty firm like dechert has to be a disaster - but you were already living a horrid life. the real problem is that you cant change industries

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:43 PM

The market will provide...

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:43 PM

It's 72/10, not 10/72.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:43 PM

The truth is that Staff Attorneys can often do more than junior associates. Many Staff Attorneys used to be associates somewhere else, so at least they have some experience.

Remember that biglaw is up or out. There aren't enough in-house and small-firm gigs for everyone that doesn't make partner.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:44 PM

"bottom of the biglaw totem pole.. worst of all worlds.. can't do anything big picture.. can just handle little pieces of glorified para work."

#4, you just described biglaw "regular associates."

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:45 PM

FWIW here is what the government sees looking into the future (these numbers are being used to test which banks might fail):

Best Case:
-2009 GDP -2.0%
-2009 unemployment 8.4%
-2009 housing prices : 14% decline
-2010 GDP +2.1%
-2010 unemployment 8.8%
-2010 housing prices : 4% decline

Really Bad Case:
-2009 GDP -3.3%
-2009 unemployment 8.9%
-2009 housing prices : 22% decline
-2010 GDP +0.5%
-2010 unemployment 10.3%
-2010 housing prices : 7% decline

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:45 PM

19, no it's not

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:46 PM

14/15

Elie is the one that said 1/4 of the Dechert staff attorneys were getting laid off. 11/12 was probably pointing out that, based on the numbers on the website, Elie is wrong. Maybe you should stop being a dumb fuck.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:48 PM

11 -- 10 != 82 / 4. Good point nonetheless. Carry on.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:48 PM

The truth is that Staff Attorneys can often do more than junior associates. Many Staff Attorneys used to be associates somewhere else, so at least they have some experience.

Remember that biglaw is up or out. There aren't enough in-house and small-firm gigs for everyone that doesn't make partner.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:52 PM

I think big firm layoffs have run 8/10ths of their course... The end is in sight.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:54 PM

20/26 = staff attorney

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:56 PM

28 = administrative assistant

30 Posted by Elie Mystal | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:57 PM

The numbers I'm getting say they have a little more than 40 staff attorneys. Those numbers could be wrong, but I'm inclined to go with actual people instead of numbers pulled off of a firm website.

That said, I'll try to clear up this conflicting information.
--Elie

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:57 PM

Speaking of market...DO A POST ON THE NALP FIGURES. 2L hiring down 33%+

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:01 PM

Sad how the layoff posts are becoming increasingly succinct:

__ staff and __ attorneys laid off at ___________. Best of luck to the newly unemployed.

Comments 1-10 reserved for those who are, think they're, beleive they ought to first.

11-20 will find a variation of TTT.

1-2 substantive comments on the firm in question.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:04 PM

UPENN STATE. philly office. ohhhh... whats up now!

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:04 PM

32-Shut up.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:05 PM

21-30 will point out typos - "beleive" ???

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:07 PM

How long till firms realize they will have to actually cut billing rates instead of just freezing salaries and conducting layoffs?

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:10 PM

First, best of luck to those who were laid off. This is a tough environment and we should all support our fellow bar members.

Second, the interesting thing about this news is the timing. Why didn't Dechert do all attorney layoffs two weeks ago, instead of releasing bad news twice? This suggests that there was further evaluation and a determination that additional cuts were necessary.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:11 PM

My two cents.

Staff attorneys may be "the bottom of the big law totem pole;" nevertheless, I would rather be a $100,000+ per year staff attorney than an unemployed mid-level associate. Try paying those student loans with your severance and $405/week New York State unemployment check.

In this economy I do not think anyone should gloat. Just be happy to be employed.

To those who wish to be haters:
Be careful who you step on on the way up. You may meet them on the way down.

- a so-called bottom of the big law totem pole staff attorney -

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:12 PM

36, firms are cutting billing rates -- it's just in the form of discounts and 2008 rate freezes for most clients.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:12 PM

My two cents.

Staff attorneys may be "the bottom of the big law totem pole;" nevertheless, I would rather be a $100,000+ per year staff attorney than an unemployed mid-level associate. Try paying those student loans with your severance and $405/week New York State unemployment check.

In this economy I do not think anyone should gloat. Just be happy to be employed.

To those who wish to be haters:
Be careful who you step on on the way up. You may meet them on the way down.

- a so-called bottom of the big law totem pole staff attorney -

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:28 PM

40 you idiot - this entire post is about staff attorneys getting laid off. why are you pretending like staff attorneys don't get laid off?

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:30 PM

this entire post is horrible news for UPenn State. the grads from their satellite campus in philly almost all rely on SWeet staff attorney gigs at biglaw. those jobs are what keep UPenn State employment stats high enough to maintain ABA accreditation.

the ship be sinking.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:30 PM

How long till firms realize they will have to actually cut billing rates instead of just freezing salaries and conducting layoffs?

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:32 PM

Anybody else out there getting the idea that this Friday is going to be UGLY? Gonna be a long day for Elie and Dave...and everyone else. Good luck in advance.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:36 PM

Well, we're all F'ed because by the end of next year, anyone still employed by biglaw will be looking at 80k/year base.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:38 PM

anybody know Dechert's PPP for 2008, or when they will release that?

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:42 PM

46, it's already been released. Something in the range of $2.15 million, down ~10%.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:06 PM

To 41

"40 you idiot - this entire post is about staff attorneys getting laid off. why are you pretending like staff attorneys don't get laid off?"

I will refrain from an ad hominem attack.

I think you missed my point. I do not think that staff attorneys are impervious to lay offs. In fact, I think that we all are vulnerable. My statement was in response to 4's comment about "bottom of the totem pole staff attorneys." I understand my role/place. I want to build a legal career and wish the best for my colleagues (I know that sounds trite).

I think that some people post to this site just to hate.
I was just trying to make a constructive point.

- a so-called bottom of the totem pole staff attorney -

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:06 PM

To 41

"40 you idiot - this entire post is about staff attorneys getting laid off. why are you pretending like staff attorneys don't get laid off?"

I will refrain from an ad hominem attack.

I think you missed my point. I do not think that staff attorneys are impervious to lay offs. In fact, I think that we all are vulnerable. My statement was in response to 4's comment about "bottom of the totem pole staff attorneys." I understand my role/place. I want to build a legal career and wish the best for my colleagues (I know that sounds trite).

I think that some people post to this site just to hate.
I was just trying to make a constructive point.

- a so-called bottom of the totem pole staff attorney -

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:17 PM

Could some please tell "a so-called bottom of the totem pole staff attorney" to only press "Post Comment" once?

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:22 PM

Could some please tell "a so-called bottom of the totem pole staff attorney" to only press "Post Comment" once?

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:22 PM

Could some please tell "a so-called bottom of the totem pole staff attorney" to only press "Post Comment" once?

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:48 PM

wonder if they will layoff more staff attys

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:54 PM

46, 47 -- they played some games with that number. A big part of the "decrease" for 2008 PPP was from shifting something like $25-30m of Q1 expenses into 2008 by doing idiotic things like prepaying rent. They artificially shifted income from 08 to 09 so that the inevitable 09 drop doesn't look as large.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 6:18 PM

To 41

"40 you idiot - this entire post is about staff attorneys getting laid off. why are you pretending like staff attorneys don't get laid off?"

I will refrain from an ad hominem attack.

I think you missed my point. I do not think that staff attorneys are impervious to lay offs. In fact, I think that we all are vulnerable. My statement was in response to 4's comment about "bottom of the totem pole staff attorneys." I understand my role/place. I want to build a legal career and wish the best for my colleagues (I know that sounds trite).

I think that some people post to this site just to hate.
I was just trying to make a constructive point.

- a so-called bottom of the totem pole staff attorney -

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 6:24 PM

54--interesting, I guess I don't blame them. It's also interesting in the sense that they had a decent year in 2008.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:07 PM

36: to add to what 39 said, also add "agreeing to massive write-offs that they would not have agreed to in days gone by (or that the clients wouldn't have had the nerve to ask for in days gone by)"

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:18 PM

22 - You left out the following:

Really, really, really bad case (yet more and more likely):

- CPI Inflation: 1,000%

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:26 PM

Big layoffs are coming for Dechert DC in the Spring. The work just isn't there to keep this many people around.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:22 PM

I think that's the general feeling at most firms. There are too many associates and not enough work. We all know what comes next. No firm is going to pay $200k a year for associate that aren't billing.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 10:28 PM

59, can u elaborate? do u have any basis (like rumors) for DC spring layoffs other than the general lack of work? practice group?

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:53 AM

For a GOOOOOD time call Amanda Becker at 213-229-5303.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 26, 2009 8:22 AM

Sounds like Dechert DC's next hit is coming sooner than springtime...

Post Your Comment