Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Layoff Watch: Faegre & Benson Proves We're Talking About Layoffs All Across the Nation

Faegre and Benson logo.JPGWhat, you thought you'd be safe from layoffs if you worked in Minnesota? Unfortunately, nobody is safe, at least not today.

We are now able to confirm that Faegre & Benson, one of the most prestigious firms in Minnesota, has informed 29 attorneys that they will be let go. Here is the statement that chairman Tom Morgan released to Above the Law:

We are practicing law in the same challenging economic environment in which our clients are doing business. Like many firms across the country, we are aligning our resources with the anticipated demand for our services and are doing so in a thoughtful and measured manner.

Earlier this month, we offered a voluntary separation package to certain non-lawyer staff. Yesterday, we announced that in the coming months we will be reducing our number of lawyers by 29. We have now met with each of those lawyers.

Remember that earlier this week, Hogan & Hartson offered a buyout package to non-lawyer staff. I wonder if people will think again about taking it, given today's news.

Never heard of Faegre & Benson? You should have. After the jump we explain why.

Most people know Faegre & Benson for their yeoman's work representing the victims of the Exxon-Valdez oil spill. Courts keep reducing the amount of damages awarded in that case, which can't be helping Faegre's bottom line.

But of course, these cuts had much more to do with the general economic climate than any one case.

We understand that today's layoffs will be effective on May 31st, which gives Faegre attorneys a little bit of time to find other jobs -- assuming of course that there are other jobs to be found.

We also have been told that the layoffs will impact all Faegre offices, not just Minnesota.

Speaking of Minnesota, we also have word IP boutique Mechant & Gould laid off 35 attorneys and staff yesterday and today. As one tipster put it:

As a somewhat small IP boutique, this is a bloodbath.

We talked with a Merchant & Gould spokesperson, but they declined to either confirm or deny the report.

Good luck to our Midwestern brothers and sisters.

Earlier: THE EXXON-VALDEZ CASE: HAVE YOU EVER TRIED SEPARATING MONEY FROM OIL?
Prior ATL coverage of law firm layoffs

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:32 PM

First!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:32 PM

damn. Black Thursday

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:32 PM

1st

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:33 PM

Eighth!

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:33 PM

Damn. Hopefully they spared their first- and second-year associates.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:36 PM

FATALITY

-

Today is bad.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:36 PM

how many layoffs in their Denver office?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:39 PM

ATL should run a story about how widespread associate layoffs will affect the student loan industry.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:39 PM

Is this some kind of sick early April Fool's joke?

10 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:39 PM

The ship be sinking...

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:39 PM

Epic fail ITE.

Thanks Bush.

Rather, I blame the **ABA for accrediting too many law schools. Doctors have jobs lined up waiting for them, lawyers scrounge for TTT jobs. Thanks ABA. This is your fault. **

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:39 PM

how do you pronounce "Faegre?"

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:40 PM

And the streets ran red with blood.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:42 PM

Faegre is known as the "Cravath" of Minneapolis

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:43 PM

Mommy?

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:44 PM

Epic fail ITE.

Thanks Bush.

Rather, I blame the **ABA for accrediting too many law schools. Doctors have jobs lined up waiting for them, lawyers scrounge for TTT jobs. Thanks ABA. This is your fault. **

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:46 PM

Mommy?

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:46 PM

ATL/Elie:

Please do a chart (since 9/2008) with months, # atty layoff, # total atty layoff, # total layoff (incl staff) and % of attys laid off.

How many AmLaw 100 (200?) attys have been laid off so far???

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:47 PM

ATL/Elie:

Please do a chart (since 9/2008) with months, # atty layoff, # total atty layoff, # total layoff (incl staff) and % of attys laid off.

How many AmLaw 100 (200?) attys have been laid off so far???

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:47 PM

ATL/Elie:

Please do a chart (since 9/2008) with months, # atty layoff, # total atty layoff, # total layoff (incl staff) and % of attys laid off.

How many AmLaw 100 (200?) attys have been laid off so far???

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:47 PM

Mechant!

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:47 PM

It's "Fay-gree"

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:47 PM

12: FAY-gree

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:49 PM

amlaw already has the chart. And it's far more objective than any chart you will find here.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:49 PM

Epic fail ITE.

Thanks Bush.

Rather, I blame the **ABA for accrediting too many law schools. Doctors have jobs lined up waiting for them, lawyers scrounge for TTT jobs. Thanks ABA. This is your fault. **

26 Posted by Jim Mora | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:49 PM

LAYOFFS?!? Don't talk about -- LAYOFFS?????? You kiddin' me MysTTTal??? LAYOFFS??

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:51 PM

It's "Fay-gree"

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:55 PM

Faegre Benson is a good law firm with good people. But the deep economic recession our country is in knows no geographic boundaries and doesn't seem to be discriminating in terms of impact on type and quality of law firm.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:55 PM

ABA: o hai guise. u want creditz?
COOLEY/ TTT: plz give me credit

COOLEY/TTT; cum to r skool and git big law cash money.
student: ok. tytyty.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:55 PM

"Posted by Jim Mora in "Some Resources for Making Sense of the Layoffs"
Monday, February 9, 2009 1:43 PM

LAYOFFS? Don't talk about -- LAY...

aw, screw it. Its about time this schtick got retired, isn't it?"

31 Posted by ShamWOW | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:55 PM

Vince here saying that although the ship be sinking, you can mop up the incoming water flooding through the portholes with a ShamWOW.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:56 PM

Where did you get the info re Merchant layoffs? A reliable source says that as of yesterday 7 attorneys were laid off, which doesn't quite seem like a bloodbath.

http://www.startribune.com/business/39466652.html?elr=KArksUUUU

33 Posted by Chocolate City | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:00 PM

11/16 – Don’t blame the ABA, blame the Department of Justice under Clinton-Reno. In 1993, the DOJ began an antitrust investigation against the ABA, claiming that the ABA’s standards were too restrictive, thus preventing new law schools from starting and more lawyers from entering the profession. The case was total BS insofar as antitrust law is concerned, but the ABA either didn’t want to or couldn’t afford to fight the DOJ. In 1996 the ABA agreed to a consent decree that loosened the standards, and since then, anyone who can rub two nickels together can start a law school and get approved by the ABA. Regent, which started off as CBNU School of Law, i.e. Christian Broadcasting Network University School of Law, is but one example.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:01 PM

When are the New York firms going to distinguish themselves by moving to the 190 scale?

NY to 190!!!

- 2007 Guy

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:01 PM

The Midwestern AmLaw 200 firms of Barnes & Thorburg and Baker & Daniels are, at minimum, cutting staff today. No word on lawyers yet.

36 Posted by Elie Mystal | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:03 PM

32. I saw that report and others. Like I said, I'm hearing 35 people total. I'm not hearing the particular breakdown is being reported elsewhere (that doesn't mean it's not true). I also understand that layoffs are ongoing today (which may account for the differences in the numbers).
Also of note, when I spoke to the firm they didn't confirm my numbers, but they didn't deny them either or point me to the previously published reports.
--Elie

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:03 PM

16- You are an idiot

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:06 PM

ABA: o hai guise. u want creditz?
COOLEY/ TTT: plz give me credit

COOLEY/TTT; cum to r skool and git big law cash money.
student: ok. tytyty.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:07 PM

Faegre Benson is a good firm comprised of good people. But fact is this unprecedented economic meltdown knows no geographic boundaries and is not discriminating between caliber of law firm it is impacting.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:08 PM

36-Elie-Have you heard any reports about layoffs going on at Milbank

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:08 PM

I am not surprised MN is feeling it. It is spreading aacross the country like wildfire.

I have to admit, that I do laugh at all of the smart ass "I work for a V10 and you all suck" commentors that I have seen little of lately. Whose laughing now you unemployed douchebags?

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:10 PM

Elie,

Honestly, I don't understand why people give you so much ish over misspellings etc. Without this site we would all be in the dark about a lot of these layoffs. You are doing a great service and for that I commend you! Keep it up! (I mean not the layoff posts...I hope those stop - not because you stop posting but because firms stop laying off....)

In any case. Thank you.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:10 PM

Elie,

Honestly, I don't understand why people give you so much ish over misspellings etc. Without this site we would all be in the dark about a lot of these layoffs. You are doing a great service and for that I commend you! Keep it up! (I mean not the layoff posts...I hope those stop - not because you stop posting but because firms stop laying off....)

In any case. Thank you.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:11 PM

OCEANS RISE

CITIES FALL

QUINN REMAINS

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:14 PM

Fascinating. Faegre was supposed to be the most stable large Minneapolis firm and they are suffering layoffs. What about Dorsey? RKMC? Briggs?

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:14 PM

None of the firms laying people off so far is v10.

-"I work at a v10 and you all suck" commentor

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:16 PM

46 - you, good sir, are an idiot.

- Fired Latham associate

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:16 PM

24 -- they should call it the "amlayoff 100".

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:16 PM

"None of the firms laying people off so far is v10. "

Latham?

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:18 PM

Terrible day.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:19 PM

8 in Denver, 21 in MPLS. Finance & Restructuring and Healthcare were the only 2 practice areas not hit.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:19 PM

Minneapolis, Milwaukee, Atlanta and Texas in general are going to pay for making first-year associates into 3rd World despots with that sky-high compensation.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:20 PM

ABA: o hai guise. u want creditz?
COOLEY/ TTT: plz give me credit

COOLEY/TTT; cum to r skool and git big law cash money.
student: ok. tytyty.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:20 PM

Can I say the Jim Mora guy makes me laugh everytime I see him?

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:21 PM

None of the firms publicly announcing economic layoffs is v10. Latham, and most other v10 firms, are conducting forced attritrion because no one is leaving. That being said, I'm sure v10 firms will also publicly lay off more people because of the economy, but none have done so yet. It will be interesting to see which v10 firms leads the charge on this.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:22 PM

$120k in Minneapolis, a city that isn't as expensive as DC but certainly more expensive than cities like Cleveland or Milwaukee or Pittsburgh, is "3rd World despot" money? Lulz. With $150k debt from Harvard, 120k salary doesn't sound that great.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:22 PM

This is really sad. Faegre is a great firm with genuinely good people - this must have been very difficult for the management to do. And yes, it is the Cravath of Minnesota, but not in the "Death Star" sense. It is the "go-to" firm - it has the best lawyers, the best clients, and the best reputation. And no, I don't work there (or in Minneapolis).

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:25 PM

52:

Minneapolis is $120k. Minneapolis is far more expensive to live in than Pittsburgh, Milwaukee, or Cleveland. It isn't Chicago, but anything close to the city is expensive. Given most Faegre lawyers have $150k+ T14 degrees and there is tremendous compression in the payscale (average raise is $5k-$7.5k), people typically leave a ton of money on the table and if they only paid $90k people would work for the AUSA.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:25 PM

Faegre first years make $120K. Recklessness might not a factor in these firings.

But my impression of Faegre has changed dramatically today.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:27 PM

Did Count Layoffyoula hurt himself overcounting?

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:28 PM

55 - If you are wondering which v10 firm will lead the charge pal, don't look now, it's probably yours. That's what you get when you put lawyers in charge of running businesses. It's the equivalent of putting a drunk yr old behind the wheel of an 18-wheeler. Also, the 4 yr old is hopped up on Meth and has IBS.

-- JD/MBA

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:30 PM

I have a sinking suspicion that my next door neighbor was one of the victims of said bloodbath.

63 Posted by BigLarry | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:39 PM

BigLarry here here saying it's definitely not safe in Minneapolis.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:39 PM

62 - Yes, I was.

65 Posted by BigLarry | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:41 PM

BigLarry here saying it's definitely not safe in Minneapolis.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:41 PM

45 -- they've all be doing aggressive "performance-based" layoffs for months. With the Faegre announcement, it will likely open the door for some more public bloodletting.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:44 PM

good firm, i worked on matters across from them as an associate in nyc. good luck all.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:52 PM

Anyone know what classes were hit the hardest in MPLS or what groups were hit the hardest? Sounds like a tough day for some good people.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:00 PM

Any info on Dorsey?

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:03 PM

51: Thanks for the information. do you know what class years got hit in Denver or Minneapolis?

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:04 PM

Any info on Dorsey?

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:26 PM

These folks are going to have a hard time finding a job, at least here in MN. MPLS is probably the most overly saturated mid-market. Four local law schools, plus people from elite schools who want to settle down here. You also got the fact that MPLS firms don't really leverage and most become partner. Not a whole lot of associate positions open up.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:32 PM

-63 - Your wife confirmed it in an email to my wife.

-62

74 Posted by Drano | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:32 PM

There is life after leaving a big law firm. Those Faegre attys, if they are motivated, will learn to swim in the real world. Many opportunities out there.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:55 PM

No talk of layoffs at Dorsey as of yet

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:57 PM

No talk of layoffs at Dorsey as of yet

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:59 PM

Minnesota has a surprising absence of large national law firms.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:00 PM

Any news on Winthrop & Weinstine?

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:04 PM

OCEANS RISE

CITIES FALL

QUINN REMAINS WITH EGG ON ITS FACE(BOOK)

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:04 PM

Any news on Winthrop & Weinstine?

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:11 PM

The seismic shift in the operating model of major law firms is opportunity for young associates to restructure their careers. There is nothing wrong in working for a boutique or localized firm. The financial rewards are doubtful to be in the same league, but who cares because a good lawyer still will make good money and will likely be blessed with a more normative and enriching work/life balance. There are better things to do in life than to use a law degree to work yourself to death and die of stress in big law.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:46 PM

It's pretty much impossible to move to Minneapolis and get a job as a lateral. Anywhere. I graduated from HLS and have been applying to everything that opens up in Minneapolis for over a year, at firms, nonprofits, government, etc. There's literally nothing here, and it's compounded by the fact that people here aren't prestige whores. I kind of assumed that an attorney who graduated from a YHS would be more desirable than one who graduated from William Mitchell or St. Thomas, but it turns out I was very, very wrong.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:05 PM

82, if you are not from Minnesota, it is very difficult to break in if you did not summer there. You have to have a connection, or they are simply not interested. Firms there hire their own kind of people, and non-Minnesota/Wisconsin/Dakotas/Iowa natives generally need not apply.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:11 PM

It's pretty much impossible to move to Minneapolis and get a job as a lateral. Anywhere. I graduated from HLS and have been applying to everything that opens up in Minneapolis for over a year, at firms, nonprofits, government, etc. There's literally nothing here, and it's compounded by the fact that people here aren't prestige whores. I kind of assumed that an attorney who graduated from a YHS would be more desirable than one who graduated from William Mitchell or St. Thomas, but it turns out I was very, very wrong.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:15 PM

It's pretty much impossible to move to Minneapolis and get a job as a lateral. Anywhere. I graduated from HLS and have been applying to everything that opens up in Minneapolis for over a year, at firms, nonprofits, government, etc. There's literally nothing here, and it's compounded by the fact that people here aren't prestige whores. I kind of assumed that an attorney who graduated from a YHS would be more desirable than one who graduated from William Mitchell or St. Thomas, but it turns out I was very, very wrong.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:17 PM

It's pretty much impossible to move to Minneapolis and get a job as a lateral. Anywhere. I graduated from HLS and have been applying to everything that opens up in Minneapolis for over a year, at firms, nonprofits, government, etc. There's literally nothing here, and it's compounded by the fact that people here aren't prestige whores. I kind of assumed that an attorney who graduated from a YHS would be more desirable than one who graduated from William Mitchell or St. Thomas, but it turns out I was very, very wrong.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:19 PM

I'm from Minnesota originally, and I still can't break in. The midwest has its own special brand of eliteness - if you went to law school in another state, they don't want you.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:38 PM

82/84-87: Why are you trying to move to Minneapolis?

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:39 PM

Because I like the winter.

- 82

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:47 PM

No, really, I am curious. Do you have family there? Raised there? Etc.

(Just like the winter would also qualify you for Vermont, Maine, Colorado, Wisconsin, Wyoming, North Dakota, etc.)

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 7:06 PM

I am pretty sure the 35-36 number for Merchant Gould includes support staff as well as lawyers. 7 of that number were lawyers.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 7:11 PM

At Faegre, the two hardest hit groups were real estate (7 lawyers, including 1st years) and corporate (10 lawyers). That's what's slow in this economy, so that makes sense. But the layoffs were definitely not based on performance, or even strictly on hours. Everyone is scratching their heads as to why they hit the people they hit, and there is a real sense that the Management Committee owes everyone a better explanation in that regard. What little they've told the affected people so far has been untrue on its face. It looks more like a random shooting than a reasoned business decision.

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:01 PM

90 - raised there and family there.
-82

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:20 PM

Milwaukee Baby! any word? rumblings at Foley and GK?

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:26 PM

Thanks, 82. I'm sure you will get an offer and be able to move back home soon. Maybe not right now, given the economy, but soon enough. Good luck.
-88/90

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:41 PM

Any news on Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly?

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:44 PM

From the Strib online (new notices only):

Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand eliminated five administrative positions. Halleland Lewis Nilan & Johnson cut at least six jobs, including two lawyers.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:55 PM

Did the Faegre attorneys see this coming? I don't remember seeing them on the list of pay freezes.

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:59 PM

35 - Any further word on Baker and Barnes? Ice going to be next? Any information would be great.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:03 PM

merchant and gould also rescinded 3L offers

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:08 PM

Along with the above posters, I'm original from Minnesota but went to an out of state T20 law school. Couldn't get a job in Minnesota. I was actually surprised how well William Mitchell did for recruiting. It almost seems there was more William Mitchell grads than U of M grads at the firms I was targeting. Strange.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:30 PM

Faegre didn't have a pay freeze. It bumped all lawyers up as usual starting with the January paycheck. Their lawyers were told prior to bonus announcements that the bonus decisions would not be significantly different than in prior years, though whether that ended up being true is not yet known. Their bonuses are not lock step--they're all ad hoc and the process is as transparent as mud, but their lawyers seem to like it. Unless they compared penis size in late December, no one will know what the wider bonus situation looked like until their annual summit later this year.

Oh, and as of a couple of weeks ago, group heads were still being told there would be no layoffs. Management repeatedly told partners and associates no layoffs. So no, no warning. Unless you read the news, distrust the managing partners, and can do math.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:42 PM

82 - I don't think breaking into the MN legal market is as difficult as you make it out to be. There is strong demand for native Minnesotans who went to elite law schools out of state. For example, most of Dorsey's summer class went to law school outside of Minnesota. That said Minnesota firms put a premium on personality and fit, so that may be a factor. Also certain practice areas are not really booming these days.

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:54 PM

Faegre is a good firm and has some very good attorneys. Wish them good luck (those staying and those asked to leave).

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:05 PM

As a University of Minnesota student I can confirm that, as was hinted at earlier, the firms in the Twin Cities aren't prestige mongers. Not being from the Midwest, I had assumed that my degree would end up getting me in doors in town just based on its name and ranking (especially compared to the other three schools). Alas, such is not the case.

And in addition to the Faegre & Benson/Merchant & Gould news, I heard today that Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen (http://www.ptslaw.com/), a local IP boutique, has rescinded its 3L offers as well.

Good luck to all those laid off.

106 Posted by Obama | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 1:45 AM

My fellow Americans, change is coming to America. It's true that things will get worse before they get better, but nothing good comes without hard work.

On behalf of a grateful nation, I think you for your sacrifices, and I look forward to your future contributions as productive lawyers.

Together, we can make it happen. Yes, we can. Yes, we will.

Believe in change, and change will come.

=======================================
NOTICE: I AM NOT REALLY OBAMA. THIS IS FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE REAL OBAMA, HIS ADMINISTRATION, OR HIS AFFILIATES.
=======================================

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 2:05 AM

For those of you law students out there who aren't from Minnesota and would like to move here, please note that you can get a job in this city without being from Minnesota or going to a Minneapolis law school. I did. Many of my friends and acquaintances did. All you need is a decent class rank from a decent (i.e. U.S. News first tier) law school and an ability to interview.

108 Posted by Obama | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 2:42 AM

Don't forget connections, 107.

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 5:44 AM

107, don't be a dick. Yes, it's possible. But it's not easy. It's actually easier from what I've seen to come in as a lateral from out of state, but that assumes the existence of a lateral position for which you are a good fit. There aren't a lot of those these days and there haven't been for a year.

--Minnesota lawyer from a non-Minnesota law school who has advocated for geographical outsiders during hiring decisions.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 6:50 AM

Hey 92

The hard part about Faegre's decision is that the affected individuals (at least the ones I am aware of) are great lawyers from great schools who were, by most accounts, successful in their practices.

What this says to the rest of the attorneys is unclear. One thing that will be difficult is that until now, the atmosphere at Faegre has generally been communal and collaborative. Things are going to suck when people start to get stupid (as in “well, they got rid of such and such because [insert ridiculous speculative unfounded rumor] ...”).

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 8:16 AM

This news is sad for everyone in Minneapolis but If it had to happen here it was going to start at Faegre. Huge overhead (at least by Minneapolis standards), eye-popping rates, less-than-efficient staffing on matters, etc. The attorneys who were laid off are good people who were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Next up.... Dorsey (although they had the good sense to freeze salaries this year, which may help them go a little bit longer without layoffs). After that.... Fredrickson, Briggs, and down the line.

Good luck everyone, we're all going to need it.

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 9:16 AM

Most of the Mpls firms do favor natives, but they also recruit quite heavily from other schools in the Midwest.

111, do you know anything specific about Dorsey or is that just the next logical step in your mind?

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 9:54 AM

112, I don't know of anything specific about Dorsey, just seems like the next logical step.

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 10:12 AM

Dorsey's overhead has to be at least as high as Faegre - plus they have that new building. Plus Faegre and Dorsey's rates are about the same. I could see it taking a little longer for trouble to pop up at the second tier of firms because Faegre/Dorsey seem to charge about $50/hour more than everybody else in town. Then you have the fact that Dorsey has all their crappy offices outside of MPLS to support (i.e. NYC). I don't know that Dorsey has taken any action but you have to think it is coming. Good luck to everyone in the market and to those who were fired yesterday.

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 10:22 AM

111--their overhead is huge by MN standards (tho Dorsey's must be higher as they are building owners) but their staffing has not been inefficient until the last year. Faegre's actually been staffed very leanly, with younger associates doing lots of primary drafting and arguing motions. This last year as work dried up thats changed. Now partners are keeping their claws in everything. I'm surprised the clients haven't noticed their bills now charge $500+ for shepardizing rather than paralegal rates. That's not because the paralegals got hundreds of dollars better, as great as the paralegals are.

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 1:57 PM

Minnesota is not that insular at all in its hiring. My firm has hired a new associate from my school (on the coast) at least three of the last five years.

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 2:20 PM

#116 - What firm do you work for?

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 2:20 PM

Dorsey does not own their own building and never has (Hines owns it, I think?). They are just so badass the name of the firm is on the front of the building. They're also the best firm in town.

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 2:52 PM

Two of the Merchant attorneys are 1st years. Merchant also made this comment in the Minneapolis Startribune--a low blow to its former employees who are now in the job market: "Merchant & Gould said that its job cuts were more about performance than the economy, although that did play into the equation."

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 3:04 PM

118 - Dorsey is not the best firm in town. Only the best local firm. Fish & Richardson is the only sizable firm with a national practice (along with corresponding billing rates) and a NY salary. I doubt many would choose Dorsey over Fish & Richardson if they had the chance.

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 3:29 PM

Dorsey definitely does NOT own the building. They DO own Minneapolis.

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 13, 2009 5:28 PM

Fish & Richardson, Schmich & Bichardson. I don't see their name on any buildings.

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:56 AM

Fuvk Dorsey they can suvk my big salty donkey divk

avatar
124 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 14, 2009 1:57 PM

I hear Faegre fired second years. It doesn't bode well for a firm to fire first and second years. First and second years should be safe in these firing rounds, and there should be a list of firms that make such firings so that law students know which firms to stay away from.

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 14, 2009 7:16 PM

Is it true that Faegre fired only attorneys and that staff/support roles were not touched other than those who took voluntary retirement?

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:22 AM

Merchant has also cancelled their entire summer program. I'm not sure how big it was to begin with but I know a few 2Ls who are SOL.

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:19 PM

Other shoe just dropped...

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 20, 2009 12:57 PM

#128 - what does that mean?

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 21, 2009 12:33 PM

It means that Faegre laid off 58 additional people on thursday. It included at least two additional hourly attorney positions, some paralegals and other staff.

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 21, 2009 8:47 PM

There might be something you don't know about their insurance. I sued them and they billed Jerome Schaefer for Mutual Insurance of Bermuda even though Mutual Insurance doesn't have a NAIC number and isn't authorized to sell insurance in the state of CO where I sued them or Minnesota or Wisconsin or Kansas or D.C. Their ex partner Christopher Beall filed in the 10th Circuit that there was no insurance after he admitted in a motion that there was insurance and sent me verified bills for Mutual Insurance and referring to the insurer. When I sued them they got judge Naughty Nottingham to order me imprisoned without stating an offense or having an evidentiary hearing. So who knows what kind of insurance they bought for themselves?

avatar
132 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 21, 2009 8:54 PM

PS Comment 131 was posted by Kay Sieverding

Post Your Comment