Add RSS RSS

Staff Layoff Watch: Buchanan Ingersoll Conducts Second Round of Staff Layoffs
Are Attorneys Soon to Follow?

bic layoffs no offers.jpgBack in November, Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney cut 15 to 25 staffers (though the firm declined to call them “layoffs”). Last week, it appears that the firm made additional cuts to its staff — and this time the firm is being clear about what is going on. Buchanan’s executive director Nolan Kurtz told Above the Law:

The firm eliminated about 25 to 30 administrative operations positions last week. Given the overall economic climate, we believe that it’s more important than ever to ensure that we have the right staffing in place firmwide.

The firm also announced the news directly to associates, on Friday. According to a tipster:

[Buchanan Ingersoll] announced Friday another round of cuts after several Harrisburg corp. and Philadelphia IP lawyers resigned….

Kurtz Buchanan told the [attorneys] that laying off staff was not because of the economy but good planning.

Will attorneys soon follow staffers into unemployment? Maybe. More from Mr. Kurtz after the jump.

Our Buchanan Ingersoll sources are understandably worried that attorney layoffs are coming to the firm. It doesn’t sound like Mr. Kurtz tried to hide the ball, on Friday. According to a tipster:

Executive director Nolan Kurtz also announced that lawyer head count would go down again shortly after “reviews are finished”….

Then he said the next group of lawyers to go will be because of performance not work loss.

Kurtz’s statement to ATL was far more diplomatic than our tipsters’ reports:

[W]e are also in the final stages of our annual attorney review period, which looks at work load, pro bono commitment, skill set and the overall needs of the firm. Much like any other firm or business, we continually review our personnel to ensure we have the best lawyers with the right skills and experience to deliver results for our clients.

We’ll let you know if the guillotine falls on Buchanan attorneys.

Good luck to former Buchanan Ingersoll staff.

Earlier: Staff Layoffs at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Prior ATL coverage of staff layoffs

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:30 PM

first

2 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:32 PM

First to say -

The ship be sinking...

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:33 PM

if your layoff is described as "performance based" (and is really a stealth layoff) as opposed to economic based - do you still get severance?

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:35 PM

BI is notorious for giving stellar reviews, then just deciding to fire associates for "performance" reasons.

The question is not if, but over/under on number let go. There are still plenty of Klett Rooney guys left there that have never fit in at BI.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:37 PM

3 - the "stealth" aspect *is* your severance. That is, they tell you need to find another job w/in 3 months but you can keep your firm email for that time and if anyone asks them, you still work there--but you don't really do any "work" for that 3 months.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:39 PM

Did anyone see the Amlaw piece on the Latham lawyer who represented a man suing the Feds for spying on him? She sure is cute http://www.lw.com/Attorneys.aspx?page=AttorneyBio&attno=03190

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:41 PM

5 - thanks - that clears up a lot...

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:44 PM

1Ls are scared to death http://www.blackbooklegal.com

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:48 PM

Wtf is a "Harrisburg"?

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:49 PM

Proskauer profits pp down 10% as of year ended last October 31. Possibility of additional layoffs under review.

11 Posted by Management Committee | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:54 PM

Second shoe....dropped.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 3:55 PM

Biglaw partner BS comment of the day:

"Kurtz Buchanan told the [attorneys] that laying off staff was not because of the economy but good planning."

Good planning like Bernie Madoff's phantom trades.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:02 PM

these midlaw firms are vicious. makes biglaw look positively warm and cuddly. layoffs are fine, but who are they fooling with this planning BS? rhetoric up the ywazoo.

at least DLA had the courage to announce it was econonomic, and gave 3 months severance. these BI clowns would sell out their own mother for an extra $5 per year in PPP.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:05 PM

BI's logic here is no better than what I'd expect Rob Robbins to say when he gets fired for his big faux pas last week.

"I didn't lose my job due to my lack of discretion, rather, I needed to go on a diet and now conveniently I can't afford food and will lose lots of weight."

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:06 PM

Like a lot of Pennsylvania firms, BI has a large number of U Penn State graduates and likes to hold onto its ivy leaguers. I wouldn't worry too much about those people.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:09 PM

if BI folds, UPenn State's employment numbers could push it into the fourth tier (if it isn't already there?)

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:10 PM

Howdy do I'm Colonel Kurtz
Bald and fat like old Fred Mertz
Watch me do a hula dance
To shake the egg rolls from my pants!

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:13 PM

16, I thought BI only hires 4th tier to begin with. I mean, what other firm has partners from Touro? Counsel ffrom Hofstra? Associates from Pace? Looks like the only way to get a job at B.I. is to go to a TTT or have a daddy who's already a partner there.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:14 PM

Buchanan Ingersoll sounds more like an industrial tool manufacturer than it does a law firm.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:18 PM

They are from $hittsburgh, PA. Their cross-town rival is Pete Kalis from K&L Gates.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:18 PM

They are from $hittsburgh, PA. Their cross-town rival is Pete Kalis from K&L Gates.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:23 PM

Isn't U of Pitt ivy like Penn State? BI has a lot of those too.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:26 PM

This is nothing new. The NY office has recently been doing both stealth layoffs and stealth demotions. They forced the managing shareholder out of her position and replaced her with another shareholder's kid. However, before they could do that, they had to force the shareholder who was next in line for the managing shareholder position out of the firm altogether. It's like Hamlet over here.

24 Posted by John Blutarsky | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:31 PM

Christ. Seven years of college down the drain. Might as well join the f**king Peace Corps.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:40 PM

22 - Neither are ivies. UPitt is tier-1. UPenn State is tier-3/4.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:42 PM

22--the ivy is U of Philadelphia, not U of Penn State.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:44 PM

isn't it "micheal" not "michael" in "Micheal Ray Richardson"

Anyway, ship be sinking. sky's the limit.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 4:57 PM

UPenn Stater Here: I don't know anyone in my class going to BI. Most of the people I know are going to V10, beotchessss

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 5:28 PM

Elie, you need to call out BI on their bull. They've been doing stealth lay-offs of attorneys since October. I have the severance agreement to prove it. The number of attorney lay-offs are already well in the double digits. Nolan is full of it.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 5:33 PM

29--what office and year? NY?

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 5:40 PM

closing the comment thread is the best things that ever happened to this site. Ninety percent of the comments are so useless, inane, incorrect, and ignorant, that it makes me feel deep shame. I always regret reading them, because it makes me regret (more than usual) that I am a lawyer. If you insist on wasting time in front of a computer, couldn't you just get involved in one of those online role-playing games and save us all from the spiritual torment of your un-clever, mean-spirited ramblings?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 5:43 PM

The firm admits that attorney head count is down 50-60 since this time last year. Not all are stealth layoffs - e.g., several patent types in Alexandria and the former Silicon Valley offices have departeed voluntarily to other firms, in-house or to the USPTO. LIfe in IP has been relatively steady over the last year, at least for attorneys, even with the departure of a couple of partners and several associates to Crowell Moring last year.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 5:44 PM

31, I think you take the prize in "ramblings." Best of luck with your "spiritual torment."

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 5:48 PM

"...eliminated about 25 to 30 administrative operations positions..."

You don't know how many positions you eliminated? How can you not know how many people you laid off? Wasn't this lay off part of months of careful planning and evaluation?

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 5:48 PM

31, "makes me feel deep shame," "makes me regret"... Your post "makes me" think you don't know how to write. No wonder why you're in PiTTTsburgh.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 6:04 PM

35 - actually I'm not. I'm just a person who thinks you are probably a typical spoiled, overeducated crybaby, naive about the world outside of your tiny, circumscribed life. Let me know when you publish your first novel--I can't wait to catch a glimpse of your incredible writing skills.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 6:06 PM

29 here: I know of at least 2 attorneys in NY who were let go...but it was unclear whether they were performance-based. The stealth economic lay offs i am aware of happened in other offices.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 6:09 PM

36, I'm too busy publishing law review articles to waste my time on a novel. Is that what you TTTs in Pittsburgh firms spend your time writing?

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 6:12 PM

Seems like you're pretty proud to be "publishing law review articles." How much does that pay these days? I don't remember getting paid for it when I did it. Anyway, good luck finding a job!

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 6:16 PM

39, you moron, I have a job. A job that encourages scholarly publications. Oh, and assuming you're also 36, lets review your prose:

-- "about the world outside of your tiny, circumscribed life"

-- "to catch a glimpse"

The best thing about TTTers trying to sound educated is that they prove to the world that they're not.

41 Posted by godzuki | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 6:18 PM

31 - godzuki here saying after having lived on earth in the deep seas for hundreds of years, i've learned a few things. among those things include an understanding that no one else has control over my feelings but me - e.g., no one else can make me angry, happy, sad, shameful, etc. but me. additionally, i've learned that all the comments on this board have no meaning except that which I decide to give them. in short, we are each the master of our own universe.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 6:25 PM

Thanks Godzuki! Yay!!!!!

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 6:39 PM

Another crap firm has layoffs. These firms (Kaye, Buchanan, etc.) never should have grown so much. Wake me up when the layoffs really start to hit the V20 (Latham not included).

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 6:57 PM

Been a Biglaw secretary forever. Employment agency suggested I apply for a federal government job and wished me luck.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 7:00 PM

43 - some would argue that firms like Buchanan haven't grown enough to remain competitive. Expect Buchanan to be actively trying to merge its way to a 1000+ lawyer firm within the next several years - or die trying. Otherwise, Buchanan and others similarly situated will be tempting targets by bigger firms with bigger PPP looking for established partners and practice groups, especially IP.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 7:13 PM

The firms that seem to be doing the best are the ones that stayed stable - the big DC-based firms. They could have grown like wildfire, but they took a more cautious approach. And you don't see them laying off people in droves.

47 Posted by alonzo | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 8:17 PM

I ended up getting into a battle royale with the last guy I laid off. He won.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 9:49 PM

46. Not really. Those firms are the most notorious for use of the stealth layoff. Two associates here, three there, a couple of counsel this week, a couple more at the end of the month, one or two more next month. One K-Street firm that would fit your description has been doing it that way for about a year now.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 9:51 PM

A "K Street firm," huh?

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 23, 2009 11:58 PM

It is spelled "Pittsburgh" There is no school known as "UPenn State."
UPenn and Penn State U are two very different schools. UPenn is in Philadelphia and is a private Ivy League school with a law school. Penn State is the state school and it's law school is in Carlisle, Pa at Dickinson. Univerisity of Pittsburgh aka "Pitt" is also a state school. There is no University of Philadelphia. Please keep the general ignorance to a low roar.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:53 AM

elie sucks. bring marin back

pls handle thx

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 2:01 AM

50= sad , slightly delusional UPenn State student.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 2:06 AM

52, 50 here.. nope. i go to the wharton school of law

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 7:58 AM

Blank Rome asked senior staff members to cut back to 4 days per week.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 9:05 AM

#43 -- Wake me up before you go go.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 9:10 AM

50: You must be new here. The big city elitists that post in the comments have been having fun with Penn/Penn St. Just ignore them.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 9:50 AM

Buchanan Imbosol - where TTTers pretend to practice law.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 9:58 AM

56 = 50 trying to be clever and prop up his schtick.

everyone knows that the Philly UPenn State is a satellite campus of Upenn State carlisle (admittedly the Philly satellite campus has slightly lower admission criteria to make up for location, but they never admit it... Upenn Staters in Philly are the equivalent of Georgetown law night program students... it's a back door into the program.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 11:47 AM

GO STEELERS!

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 5:40 PM

95% of people on this board,
I don't care where you work, how much you make, where you went to school, etc. your insecurities will ensure that you never have a happy life. Attempting to knock others down so as to make yourself feel better about your lot in life is pathetic and your posts show that you are bitter people! It's pathetic and it shows. You can probably count your good friends on one hand.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, February 24, 2009 9:56 PM

They were laying people off in the summer.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:16 AM

Many of you "hoity toity" people from Tier 1 Schools or Ivy League Schools need to think about what you are typing before you type it. There is no school called U Penn State. There is University of Pennsylvania which is Ivy League, and there is Penn State which is a state school. Then you also have University of Pittsburgh aka PITT. Yes, there are some 4th Tier partners and associates at BI, but there are also some at Reed Smith, KL & Gates, Blank Rome, Jones Day, Morgan Lewis, Pepper Hamilton, etc. I don't think a firm should be judged based on what school the partners went to. More importantly, it definitely shouldn't be judged by people who don't even know the difference between Penn State and U Penn.

Post Your Comment