Add RSS RSS

The Curious Case of K&L Gates

KL Gates logo.JPGWe reported yesterday that K&L Gates was likely to announce layoffs today. There is still no comment from the firm.

Firm chairman Peter Kalis’s “out of office” reply is somewhat curious given the news swirling around the firm today. Here’s what we received when we emailed him (again) today:

I will have infrequent access to email today. I will respond to your email as soon as possible. Thank you.

Peter Kalis
K&L Gates LLP

This has led some tipsters to believe that the layoff announcement will come Monday instead of today.

But whenever the news comes — if it comes — it looks like the firm doesn’t want associates jumping out of windows. Literally.

Details after the jump.

Just after 2:00 p.m. on a Friday, K&L Gates decided to send around a reminder to “all U.S. personnel” about the mental health services the firm provides:

This is a reminder that K&L Gates provides an Employee Assistance Program (EAP), administered by Magellan Health Services, to all U.S. personnel and their dependents as a resource to help with a variety of life events and personal transitions. The EAP is offered at no cost to you, your spouse, and other members of your family. The EAP addresses questions in the quickest, least restrictive, and most convenient manner while protecting your confidentiality. When you call, a professional staff member will explain the available programs, help you assess your needs, and refer you to the appropriate resources. In addition, you or your family can access www.MagellanHealth.com for helpful information on hundreds of topics, screening tools, and personalized improvement plans. The K&L Gates EAP provides up to eight sessions per occurrence at no charge for you or your family member.

It’s probably nothing. It’s probably just a coincidence. People really are stressed all over, and nobody wants a layoff story to turn into a true tragedy.

But, the timing is certainly curious. Why would H.R. choose a random Friday at the end of February to remind people to take care of mental health during “life events and personal transitions?”

Regardless of the reason, the point should be well taken by everybody in Biglaw. This isn’t the end of the world. For most people, this isn’t even the end of a career. If you are consumed with bleak and black thoughts, get the help you need and deserve.

Keep your head up.

Earlier: Nationwide (Impending) Layoff Watch: K&L Gates Could Make Cuts on Friday

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:05 PM

boring....

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:06 PM

Nothing will happen for another 2 weeks.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:07 PM

Only interested if there is blood on the walls.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:08 PM

yawn

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:08 PM

why make you think about it all weekend?....that's just cruel....

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:09 PM

2 - you guessing?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:15 PM

3 probably is guessing, but it makes sense. ATL's article told everybody yesterday "look over there at K&L Gates!!! Something bad is going to happen!!!" And everybody looked. Why would it want to do something it's not proud of when everybody is staring at it? Why not wait until people and their short attention spans are focused on something else before firing your employees. It makes sense for K&L to wait until the spotlight is off to fire people.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:16 PM

Elie, I am all about conspiracy theories, but these aren't exactly wonderful times. Lawyers already had one of the highest suicide and alcohol abuse rates, and that was without all this new uncertainty, stock crashes, laid off friends, lost clients, lost exit opportunities, etc etc. Is it really such an unreasonable time for people to be very depressed? I don't blame you for offering the logical leap, but please be considerate of the horrible time that folks in this industry might be going through.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:17 PM

If you are laid off, I don't suppose you still get access to these "EAP" benefits anyway.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:19 PM

There is a lot of daylight left today.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:19 PM

You do if the layoff comes with notice instead of severance...

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:21 PM

anyone there? what's the mood like?

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:22 PM

There is a chanel 4 news van parked outside the office in Pittsburgh.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:23 PM

K&L is choosing not to participate in the recession.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:24 PM

Associates also got COBRA notices in the mail yesterday...coincidence?

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:24 PM

It probably means he, and the other top brass, are all traveling to one central location to talk about the firings... so they are too big to handle over the phone

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:27 PM

They probably need a little more time to come up with better packages, now that all eyes are on them.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:29 PM

KLobster Gates is in no position to hire any major laterals from Skadden.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:30 PM

Notify by BlackBerry over the weekend, lock them out on Monday.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:31 PM

Man....I hope none of you get the axe. As someone who was laid off, I can tell you its not a pretty picture out there in terms of other opportunities. You get a little tired of those with jobs telling you that "You'll find something, I'm sure of it" Not in this economy...

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:34 PM

20, You'll find something, I'm sure of it.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:35 PM

18 - HILARIOUS.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:42 PM

OK, this is complete hysteria now. There is enough genuine carnage out there to waste time on this nonsense. ATL got it wrong. But they are on the case and will get to the bottom of the rumors, probably.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:42 PM

@20 -- You will find something, I am sure of it. Just look at me, I am now a licensed food cart operator and sell Lobster Falafel on the corner of 53rd and 6th.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:43 PM

20, I was laid off as well. I'm not even going to bother looking for a while.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:46 PM

Hopefully Mr. Kalis is smart enough not to talk about this in transit to his undisclosed location.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:48 PM

Can people show a little compassion? My gosh, people are terrified about losing their livelihoods, many responsible for feeding families, and many of you are treating this like some f-ing game.
Have SOME class, people.

- An Associate With Some Sense of Decency

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:48 PM

Can people show a little compassion? My gosh, people are terrified about losing their livelihoods, many responsible for feeding families, and many of you are treating this like some f-ing game.
Have SOME class, people.

- An Associate With Some Sense of Decency

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:48 PM

I blame Spike Lee and Steve Balmer.

Nupsty

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:49 PM

12 minutes until ax time.

31 Posted by The Man With The Axe | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:51 PM

Two 3L’s from Seton Hall are driving along the Jersey Turnpike towards Manhattan. The woman in the car looks up from her copy of The American Lawyer as the man slows the car down.
3L Woman: “What are you doing?”
3L Man: “Isn’t that Peter Kalis, the managing partner of K&L Gates, by the side of the road? Maybe he needs a ride into Manhattan.”
3L Woman: “He has an axe!”
3L Man: “But he is a BigLaw partner. Maybe if we do him a favor, he will offer us jobs at K&L Gates.”
3L Woman: “But he has an axe!”
3L Man: “I’m sure there’s a good reason for it.”
The man stops the car, and lowers the window.
3L Man: “Excuse me, Mr. Kalis, but what’s with the axe?”
Kalis: “It’s a . . . . . letter opener.”
3L Man: “Hop in!”

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:51 PM

20 - I'm with you. I'm also being tired of being told how I can "go work for government" or "go work for the administration." Because they aren't being flooded with resumes or anything.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:52 PM

20, 25 -

I was laid off last year and have been looking, but there's nothing out there. Who knows, maybe not looking for a while beats hardcore looking and being depressed about it - who knows, maybe things will pick up. What worries me is this huge gap in my resume...I wonder if firms will understand or if our chances of finding good jobs in the future are pretty much over?

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:52 PM

27: Its called gallows humor. Get a clue.

- An Associate With 30 Days of his "Notice Period" Left Before the Dreaded Resume Gap...but still with a sense of humor.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 3:56 PM

31 = terrible. Go back to molesting tweens at Twilight screenings.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:00 PM

My mom Googles me everyday, is that prestigious?

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:00 PM

I'm surprised we haven't heard about more suicides.

I disagree with Elie, this **is** the end of a major law career for most people. Once you're kicked out of biglaw, what are you going to do? You can't fix drunk tickets and do divorces for a few years and then become a lateral partner at Skadden. Maybe if you're lucky you could get a job as a sore-back litigator, but transactional associates are boned.

For students, our careers are over before they began. We started the game playing by one set of rules, and the game has changed while we're in school. I'm surprised more students haven't "been found dead in their apartment."

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:01 PM

Hey Axe Man, no need for those SHU kids to go to Manhattan, K&L Newark is in the same building complex as the law school.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:02 PM

34:
How is telling you that your legal career is over and that you better get use to wearing a paper hat ok with you?
Besides, for humor to be "gallow," the person who is anxious must utter it, not the employed f making fun of those laid off.
-27

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:02 PM

34:
How is telling you that your legal career is over and that you better get use to wearing a paper hat ok with you?
Besides, for humor to be "gallow," the person who is anxious must utter it, not the employed f making fun of those laid off.
-27

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:02 PM

34:
How is telling you that your legal career is over and that you better get use to wearing a paper hat ok with you?
Besides, for humor to be "gallow," the person who is anxious must utter it, not the employed f making fun of those laid off.
-27

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:02 PM

34:
How is telling you that your legal career is over and that you better get use to wearing a paper hat ok with you?
Besides, for humor to be "gallow," the person who is anxious must utter it, not the employed f making fun of those laid off.
-27

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:03 PM

This shit be stinkin'

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:03 PM

34:
How is telling you that your legal career is over and that you better get use to wearing a paper hat ok with you?
Besides, for humor to be "gallow," the person who is anxious must utter it, not the employed f making fun of those laid off.
-27

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:04 PM

13- I walked past the news people in Pittsburgh this morning and they were interviewing people coming out of the parking garage about a tax credit. I don't think its related to K &L.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:05 PM

STOP BEING MEAN ON THE INTERNETS!

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:06 PM

13- I walked past the news people in Pittsburgh this morning and they were interviewing people coming out of the parking garage about a tax credit. I don't think its related to K &L.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:10 PM

37, excuse my French, but your post was fucking pathetic.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:10 PM

I just punched a KL associate in the face.

Skadden Fu

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:10 PM

Pablo Picasso was never called an asshole.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:14 PM

Peter Kalis is currently boarding the Acela, equipped with the finest Bluetooth headset money can buy.

Layoff news to follow - loud and clear!

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:14 PM

37, get a grip. You can work for a smaller or regional firm, even doing transactional work. You can work for the government. You can get a graduate degree in something else. All that cool stuff on the bottom of your resume---the languages, the qualifications, the independent research---have at it. The debt is heavy, but ask yourself if having a prestigous law degree and the professional qualification to use it, over the course of your life, is worth more than the $150K condo 20 miles out on a commuter rail line that your high school classmates bought out of college.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:15 PM

48 - once you're off the biglaw train, how do you get back on?

Perhaps you could get a judicial clerkship after a few years of firm work. You might be able to get a job with the DOJ or become an AUSA. From those positions you could get back into Biglaw. Otherwise, you're boned.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:16 PM

I too was "rightsized". It sucked. Did not look at this board or most other things for a while. Then I realized I still needed money. What really sucked...I was in the earlier rounds of layoffs where all we got was 2 months and we could keep our names on the site for those two months.

So after a lot of "No Hire" signs and "Attorneys need not apply" I took an entry level position in the Gap. I am sure you can quickly determine the difference in pay (mid-senior associate in NY V10 firm) to entry level at the Gap.

Then I got laid off from the Gap. They too had some layoffs. I was last in, first out. They also said "we both know you have no intention of staying here long term." They said I would be better in their legal department (not hiring) or in their retail management (except I do not have any retail experience...at least only a few weeks of it). I thought I was quite good at folding shirts and stacking them!

So after further depression, I now go to an agency every morning by 6am and a series of vans come by. They say they need X number of people for Y job. Once the van fills, it goes off. Then another one comes by and the same thing all over again. At the end of the day they pay you in cash.

It is manual day labor, not what I thought I would be doing. I am ashamed of what I am doing and really don't discuss the specifics with friends and family.

I hope this is not long term, but the reality is it might. Many are suggesting with the numbers in the layoff club being so high, no matter what the market does, it can never reabsorb the lot of us.

Right now I am trying to get by (full undergrad and law school loans from a pricey New England school...shows what that is worth now).

Soon I and many others will have to start thinking about life after the practice of law. I do admit that I have thought about opening my own shop...anyone need a corporate attorney who does mutli billion dollar transactions? Didn't think so.

By the way, today, like some days, there was not enough work for the full day in the van I got in. What's worse, I was not the first attorney to join the day labor group, nor have I been the last. In fact, laid off attorneys represent the fasted growing group of people at this agency.

One more confession...I am not the best at the day labor work. But I have to pay the loans and get something to eat.

I feel for you all. If anyone has any better suggestions please post, and maybe ATL could even do an article on what others are doing to get by.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:19 PM

53, 48 here. Biglaw sucks ass. You should bypass the train altogether. Biglaw is good for one thing - paying off your student loans and then getting the hell out, which I will be doing shortly. I know it will suck to have those loans weighing you down, but you will be much happier at a smaller firm, trust me. The grass is not greener at Biglaw.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:19 PM

Hey law student 37, you could just get a life outside of work and see what that's all about.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:26 PM

54 - Are you for real?

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:27 PM

57 - yes. You can see his work on redtube.com

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:28 PM

What happened to "/wrists", Elie?

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:29 PM

57:

I can't tell either. Who would write so much yet make it up? On the other hand, lawyer to laborer sounds extreme. I know those laid off from Biglaw recently and many of them have found something to do in between Biglaw and manual labor.
If 54 is legit, my apologies and I hope you find something more to your liking soon.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:29 PM

57:

I can't tell either. Who would write so much yet make it up? On the other hand, lawyer to laborer sounds extreme. I know those laid off from Biglaw recently and many of them have found something to do in between Biglaw and manual labor.
If 54 is legit, my apologies and I hope you find something more to your liking soon.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:30 PM

57:

I can't tell either. Who would write so much yet make it up? On the other hand, lawyer to laborer sounds extreme. I know those laid off from Biglaw recently and many of them have found something to do in between Biglaw and manual labor.
If 54 is legit, my apologies and I hope you find something more to your liking soon.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:30 PM

This is the real 54...not that I can truly prove this, but trust me, this is for real.

Proud...no. Making ends meet...yes.

Oh, I terminated my pricey apartment in NYC, paid the 4 month penalty (was a 2 year lease renewal and was only 5 months in) and have since moved in with a number of friends all sharing a run down apartment in a much less desirable location.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:30 PM

Haha 58, you got me.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:31 PM

Haha 58, you got me.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:31 PM

Haha 58, you got me.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:44 PM

after Latham's announcement, K&L realized they were not being ambitious enough. I bet they delayed just so they could dig up another 100 names for layoff lists,and check their WARN requirements.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:44 PM

Maybe you can get injured doing manual labor and then bring a tort suit?

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 4:59 PM

even bankruptcy associates are getting laid off - that is how screwed we all are

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 5:15 PM

L&W definitely had something to do with it. At my office a bunch of the partners on my floor were talking about Latham this morning. Then that same bunch all disappeared for a couple hours. I just read that over. This is obviously making me insane and paranoid. Now I have to sweat it out through the weekend, too. That EAP email didn't help, either.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 5:19 PM

does anyone else take a breathe every now and then and realize that all of this, the loans, the job, the "prestige", the car payments, all of it....will all be a puff of smoke one day when we're long gone? none of it will matter. i have a friend who had to voluntarily repo her car b/c it all went down the shitter..she has piss credit right now, but she whittled her expenses down to bare min. and has a job she enjoys far from biglaw. no one can deny that the carnage is awful and the fear is palapable at firms who've remained mum about layoffs despite stating how "difficult" '09 will be. one day at a time.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 5:23 PM

Those of you who didn't pay off your loans as quickly as possible must be feeling the burn now!

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 5:28 PM

How is it possible that bankruptcy lawyers are getting laid off?

There are going to be a historic number of bankruptcies this year.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 5:32 PM

70 - 2 is right - it won't be the weekend - we're looking at two weeks.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 5:42 PM

Word is that the Executive Committee is in Miami, planning the mayhem to follow. Two weeks.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 5:47 PM

"Regardless of the reason, the point should be well taken by everybody in Biglaw. This isn't the end of the world. For most people, this isn't even the end of a career. If you are consumed with bleak and black thoughts, get the help you need and deserve.

Keep your head up."

This is the only reasonable thing I've read on this blog in my past 2 years of periodic reading.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 5:49 PM

Haven't checked a calendar since this morning, but I didn't realize that February had been extended...so we should be hearing around...February 41st?

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 6:10 PM

73 - that is exactly what the survivors in the group were asking themselves. some firms may not be able to pull in the bk work like the others. if not, then watch out because those firms are in real trouble.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 7:18 PM

Allow me to take a moment here and panic.


AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!

I DON'T WANT TO WORK AT STARBUCKS!!!!!!!!!!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!


Thank you for your time.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 7:34 PM

Smart laterals got a guaranteed base + bonus......once again the world takes a turn for monty burns...............

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 7:39 PM

Has the credit line been renewed yet?

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 8:03 PM

Face it, at this point, who gives a shit. If you are screwed, you are screwed. My only regret is leaving Weil - the only firm who does well in the good times, and does well mopping up the shit in the bad times. Some of us were fortunate enough to ride the gravy train and make a ton of money during the legal boom. But if you take a step back and think about it, is someone with no job experience really worth $160,000 per year? Is it that much of a sacrifice for some partner to take a pay cut for 1 or 2 years from $2,500,000 per year to $2,000,000 per year?

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 9:08 PM

among Pittsburgh firms, Reed Smith owns K&L. back of the line beatch.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 10:20 PM

Why, 83? Just because Reed Smith pays its associates more? You must have more than that to support your claim.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 10:26 PM

83-

You obviously don't know the REAL story. K&L was built on the backs of wonderful, selfless men, who were former Reed Smith lawyers who went off to save humanity in WWII only to find they had been passed over by the commie pinko wussies who lacked the cajones to drive Hitler to his grave.

These same brave men came back and decided to form a much better firm, where honor, dignity and doing things the right way helped them prevail and become Reed Smith's daddy in the Pittsburgh market place and beyond.

Shortly thereafter, they decided to abandon honor, dignity and a desire to do things the right way in exchange for big bucks, no debt, and a sense of smugness equaled only by a second generation Bush.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 10:36 PM

What a horrific firm. The sum of the parts is not greater than the whole. How sad. Most of the partners are sitting on bank and ready and willing to ruin the livelihoods of their people. They will all get theirs - here or in heaven.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 10:37 PM

What a horrific firm. The sum of the parts is not greater than the whole. How sad. Most of the partners are sitting on bank and ready and willing to ruin the livelihoods of their people. They will all get theirs - here or in heaven.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 10:37 PM

What a horrific firm. The sum of the parts is not greater than the whole. How sad. Most of the partners are sitting on bank and ready and willing to ruin the livelihoods of their people. They will all get theirs - here or in heaven.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 27, 2009 11:43 PM

Algebra: If you fire 4 non-equity partners and you want to have a 4:1 attorney to secretary ratio, how many secretaries can you now fire?

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 2:15 AM

The rumor around the office is the associates who will be let go have been notified and have a choice between a 3 month severance check or working 3 more months while looking for a new job. No associate has admitted to receiving notice. A couple are packing their personal belongings.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:01 AM

KL associate here. 90, in what office? No word of that in the office I work in, and everyone is on edge waiting to see what happens. Rumor we heard was it was coming down in the next couple of weeks and that a list of names had been sent from local office to King Kalis, who would then say 'yea' or 'nay' as to whether there were enough cuts.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:45 AM

91 -- what office are you in?

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:50 AM

Pete has been seen watching a lot of Gladiator on his laptop. He has had it checked out from Netflix for two months. He wants to distract his servants with several weeks of gladitorial games. Next week, securities associates are to fight finance associates to the death.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 10:09 AM

Reed Smith associate here. Pretty similar firms, although KL has obviously grown faster and in more markets recently. Not sure if that is good or bad though. Which firm has the bigger transactional practice? Reed Smith is still mainly litigation, and we never really got the big Wall Street work, so people are still fairly busy. In fact, the transactional work we DO have, is mainly with banks like NY Melon or PNC, and they are doing fairly well considering. We have had many many stealth layoffs, but no out-and-out layoffs.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 11:45 AM

K&L Associate here, why would it take the two weeks, though? Have the lists from each office already been submitted? If so, are they going to notify individuals over the next two weeks or are decisions being made back and forth and then an announcement at the end? It's really ridiculous (and unprofessional) how in the dark this whole thing is at every firm.

From what I know around my office, the decision-makers are obsessed with keeping with "the market." Now that Latham set a new bar, I've been seeing a bloodthirsty look on some faces. I heard candidly from one partner that the firm was going to take the opportunity to cut third and fourth year associates who haven't been billing but who would normally survive through a review, of counsel who also don't bill up to standards, and probably some reorganization of income partners who don't bring in the business to match their salary. I've also heard that the firm will take the opportunity to clean up some groups who haven't had the work for some time. No specifics on which groups, but NY and DC were mentioned. But, the Latham thing has me wondering whether they will make deeper cuts - even though Kalis vowed not to emasculate any practice group. There's no way K&L would match the severance of Latham, even if it does match the cuts.

What have you all been hearing? I'd kill to get my hands on some of the emails.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 2:19 PM

KL associate here. We haven't heard anything specific yet. The rumor going around here is that the "lists" were given to Kalis yesterday for review. After reviewing the initial lists he will then, if he finds it necessary, push the partners in each office to make further cuts. According to what I've heard everything would happen in one day as it did at Latham.

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 2:24 PM

Reed Smith owns K&L in Pittsburgh? Where have you been?

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 2:40 PM

The two-week delay once the "lists" have been submitted also includes the vetting process by the firm's general counsel's office.

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 3:00 PM

So, is it "Kalis" or "callous"? Perhaps he should take a paycut.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 28, 2009 5:33 PM

KL associate here (former PGE). Two weeks from yesterday = Friday the 13th. Wouldn't that be rich.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 1, 2009 1:11 AM

K&L Associate here...rumor we hearing from some partners, some of the delay also had to do with the acquisition of Bell Boyd. As I understand it, technically, KL could not terminate the BBL people until KL acquired BBL. Now they are reviewing the Chicago lists as well. I was told to expect big cuts, numbers similar or greater to L&W. Which offices, practices, years of practice...have no idea. Except that few associates have immunity, including current 3L's who are supposed to be starting and 2Ls who are planning on summering.

While I am busy and have been on track for meeting hours, even I feel unsecure. So I have taken the liberty of packing a few things this weekend and removed them from the office so in the event of mass hysteria my valuable personal items don't get taken, or more likely used to impale others.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 1, 2009 9:05 AM

37 - Perhaps these days are signaling an end to the "major law career" of many, but just not for the people you think will be so affected.

I was witness to similar legal industry wide bloodbaths in 1989 and 1990. Back then, there was much doom and gloom prohesizing over the "careers" of the then 26-30 year olds laid off from frims in droves.

Now, nearly 20 years later, it is actually the "survivors" of those years I can't find in any legal industry listing. Those laid-off in the earliest years of their careers were the people who were forced to become creative and think outside the box at a time that they were young enough to do so. They weren't made unattractive by BigLaw institutionalization yet. Their weighty salaries weren't weighty enough to dissuade other employers from hiring them - especially after a longer-than-usual period of unemployment.

Now, when I Google the names of the "deadwood" of 1989 and 1990 vintage, I find them as partners of mid-sized firms that grew with the booms that would follow. I find them as executives in some pretty impressive corporations - both large and small. I find them with phat practices of their own with their names on the door and with ritzy ZIP codes.

The "lucky" ones who were held onto? I google them and find only a scant handful anywhere. I've found some "lucky" ones made partner within a year or two of the bloody years were apparently let go as partners shortly thereafter.

I can find only TWO junior associates I EVER knew in those years as BigLaw partners now (One SSL, one SASMF). I can find a handful of mid-level associates I knew in those years as partners in "lesser" firms in other major metro areas, like DC. Judging from the bios of those people, they're at least equity partners.

Creativity can be your friend in these years.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 1, 2009 9:37 AM

101: Posts like yours are not helpful, untrue and mean spirited. What is so entertaining about inciting hysteria. Is K&L Gates about to laoff associates? Yes. Are the numbers going to look anything like Latham? No!

If no one has come to check-in and counsel you on your utilization, you will be fine. Continue to turn out high quaility work and don't worry about your jobs. They firm is not about to conduct mass layoffs on the Latham scale.

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 1, 2009 9:37 AM

101: Posts like yours are not helpful, untrue and mean spirited. What is so entertaining about inciting hysteria. Is K&L Gates about to laoff associates? Yes. Are the numbers going to look anything like Latham? No!

If no one has come to check-in and counsel you on your utilization, you will be fine. Continue to turn out high quaility work and don't worry about your jobs. They firm is not about to conduct mass layoffs on the Latham scale.

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 1, 2009 10:32 AM

hats off to Latham for finding a balance between the marginal COST of each unoccupied associate and the marginal UTILITY in signaling that they value the same associates at higher levels than their peer firms.

In doing so, Latham PWNED! their PEER FIRMS firms who docilely submitted to the INFORMATION CASCADE manifest in the half-skadden trend.

what is most remarkable and precedent-setting about Latham's action here is that it resisted the urge to mimic numerous other firms that, to the unaided, public eye, appeared to be identically situated. its choice here could spell the difference between future inter-competitiveness among its peers. young, talented lawyers will compete more intensely for the Latham job hereafter.

other firms = pwnd!

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 1, 2009 10:39 AM

94, associate from a BigLaw SF office here. Reed Smith Pittsburgh may be doing okay but its Bay Area offices are hurting. Friends of mine in the SF office are desperate for work that's being hoarded (surprise surprise) by junior partners for themselves. And their Oakland office closed a whole floor and laid off a huge amount of staff, which sure looks like the writing on the wall for a closure. Maybe they shouldn't have acted as a lifeline for the Thelen folks.

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 1, 2009 12:48 PM

Reed Smith has already laid off so many associates that I can't imagine there is too much more fat let to trim ...

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 1, 2009 8:26 PM

If the office is closed because of snow, can they still fire us tomorrow?

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, March 2, 2009 11:53 AM

101 -

You wrote: "Except that few associates have immunity, including current 3L's who are supposed to be starting and 2Ls who are planning on summering."

Did you mean to say "a few associates"? B/c that would make more sense.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, March 2, 2009 6:23 PM

Elie, please note your use of a comma after "but". This is frustrating. Thanks,

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 6:36 PM

Burn in Hell Kalis!!!!! and take Vester Hughes with you!!

Post Your Comment