Add RSS RSS

Career Alternatives for Law Students: Playboy Bunny

stephanie haney fake unc law student copy.jpgDespite the rise in applications to law schools, many current law school students might be lamenting their decision to pursue a J.D. There’s more news about Biglaw firms firing than hiring these days. Summer associate programs are shrinking in size, being shortened, or being cut altogether. Start dates for 3Ls are being pushed back to next decade. What’s a law student to do?

Instead of aiming to get her head shot on the website at Boies Schiller, one (alleged) UNC 2L is doing an OCI hoping to get into the pages of Playboy. The men’s magazine is recruiting students from across the country for its college issue and is at UNC looking for models for “Girls of the ACC.” From the Daily Tar Heel:

Second-year law student Stephanie Haney, 24, said that she would be honored if chosen. “The women in Playboy are the most beautiful women in the world,” she said.

Haney said she would only pursue modeling in the short run so she can finish school. But she’s willing to put her degree on hold. “I feel like this is something you have to take if it comes up,” Haney said.

If “it comes up,” it would be a good sign for Haney’s future in pornography, or as she refers to it, “the entertainment and image industry.”

More discussion, plus some UPDATES, after the jump.

stephanie haney unc law student above the law.jpgLaw students (or whatever Haney is) getting naked is not a recession-driven trend. Law school students have taken their clothing off in our pages before. And we provided extensive coverage (or uncoverage) of lawyer-turned-Playboy-model Oona O’Connell.

But we’re always happy to bring you more on the naked side of the law. See this SFW video from Stephanie Haney’s photo shoot. The video from Haney’s tryout shoot is password-protected now. Sorry!

UPDATE (2:30 p.m.): Do we have a little Tar Heel scandal on our hands? It turns out that Haney may be using fake UNC Law creds for her Playboy resume. Professor Maxine Eichner just wrote to us:

Dear Ms. Hill,
Much as we try to teach our law students to be enterprising in this difficult economic climate, we cannot claim Stephanie Haney, who you refer to as a 2L at UNC Law, as our own. We have no student registered by that name and cannot identify her as a student under any other name. We have notified the editors of the Daily Tar Heel, who originally reported this, as well, of the error.
Best,
Maxine Eichner
Professor of Law
UNC School of Law

Who is Stephanie Haney? Does claiming to be a law student really help you get into Playboy? Perhaps Haney didn’t get the memo after an accidental admission offer? Is she actually a student but using an assumed name? We don’t know the answers, but we’re trying to get them. We invite your speculation in the comments in the meantime.

UPDATE (6:30 p.m.): As it turns out, Stephanie — whatever her last name might be — IS a UNC law student. See here.

Video: Playboy seeks playmates at UNC [Daily Tar Heel]
Playboy hopefuls pose [Daily Tar Heel]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:24 PM

finally.. a post worth reading

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:24 PM

First to say I can't wait to watch this when I get home from work!

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:26 PM

UVA chicks are hotter. At least this isn't UTexass.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:27 PM

Those are some insane tits...

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:27 PM

This is why I should have applied to UNC....

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:30 PM

Perhaps this is one way I can spend my time before joining the firm.

- Prestigious Weil 3L Deferred Until 2012

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:31 PM

"Second-year law student Stephanie Haney, 24, said that she would be honored if chosen. "The women in Playboy are the most beautiful women in the world," she said."

..and if selected, I will too feel beautiful, filling the gaping hole in my identity left by the absence of paternal love. Oh why, daddy, why?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:33 PM

with her looks I don't think she'll have any trouble finding a law job. Hot girls are recession-proof.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:38 PM

No news here - UNC law students often have to exploit their bodies once they realize their law degree is worthless.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:39 PM

ATL's coverage of porn starts, and by that I mean law students and those saddled with large debt, seems quite tilted. Surely not only women have removed their clothing to provide extra funds to pay for tuition.

Here is but one example of the opposite gender selling looks for a cause: http://www.bostonherald.com/track/inside_track/view/2008_09_18_Lawyers/srvc=home&position=6

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:39 PM

I for one hope that she doesn't get picked becuase she has just effecively killed her law career. Recruiters use the internet too. I would never, ever hire someone who tried to get in Playboy.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:39 PM

Apparently UVa students are welcome to try out . . . http://cvillain.com/2009/03/24/playboy-will-visit-uva-to-find-models-for-2009-girls-of-the-acc/

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:40 PM

That second girl has nice child-bearing hips. She should have no trouble squeezing out the puppies.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:41 PM

11 = Ugly Chick

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:42 PM

6- Hope the presitge pays the bills

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:42 PM

I know yall are wearin the law goggles, but these girls are not that hot. A typical sorority girl at a big southern party school is ten times hotter than these girls. Ive hooked up with girls that look better than these skanks, and thats sayin somethin since I have no standards and no game.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:43 PM

I went to UNC for undergrad. People often ask me why not UNC law. From this point forward, I'll direct them to this video.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:43 PM

Since when do they allow chubby women in that magazine?

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:44 PM

yikes! She's only 24?? Her face looks MUCH older. Sunblock is your friend. Tanning beds are not.

(yeah, yeah. I know guys wont' look at her face given the size of her boobs)

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:47 PM

Yes! First post worth reading on here in a long time. Curse my ambition for taking me to presitigious institutions, what I really want is to go to UNC where they have an interesting student body.

Now back to billing =(

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:48 PM

According to Catharine MacKinnon, by publishing an article about the possible publication of pictures of nude women--especially a young and educated one--you are objectifying women as sex objects and perpetuating the historical subordination of women.

I hope you feel good about yourself.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:48 PM

Oh whatever 11, I am a female in recruiting at a big firm and I wouldn't automatically hold it against her. Hardcore pornography would be a different matter, but I doubt modeling for playboy would kill her legal career if done as tastefully as possible (I know, I know). Not saying I would recommend it, but I can't say for sure I wouldn't have done it as a student if offered- structuring your life choices around what stuffy law firms and clients might think won't guarantee you much anyway. And yes, people who know me would be shocked to hear me say this

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:49 PM

This girl is hot and will be much better off going the playboy route. With playboy, she will definitely end up getting married to a wealthy guy and having a family of her own. The ugly law girls wind up on the fast track to a single, childless, and ultimately boring existence.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:50 PM

19 = ugly chick

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:50 PM

21 = Lesbian

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:50 PM

Great figure.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:51 PM

These girls been chewin on rocks.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:51 PM

Oh whatever 11, I am a female in recruiting at a big firm and I wouldn't automatically hold it against her. Hardcore pornography would be a different matter, but I doubt modeling for playboy would kill her legal career if done as tastefully as possible (I know, I know). Not saying I would recommend it, but I can't say for sure I wouldn't have done it as a student if offered- structuring your life choices around what stuffy law firms and clients might think won't guarantee you much anyway. And yes, people who know me would be shocked to hear me say this

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:51 PM

22,

Dear female in recruiting,

The attorneys make the hiring decisions, not you.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:51 PM

She's good but not not not playboy material

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:52 PM

She is too skinny to be a wife in Texas.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:54 PM

I'm a 3L at Carolina, and I've never heard of this girl. She's not listed in the campus directory, nor is she in the private picture directory on the intranet. She also doesn't seem to be on facebook. Something isn't right....

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:55 PM

I most certainly could not love a girl like this. At least not for more than 10-15 minutes.

(call me?)

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:55 PM

29- who do you think tells the attorneys what we find on the internet? And sits in on the hiring decisions and kind of knows what will and will not be a deal-breaker?

22
(and my apologies for the double post)

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:56 PM

Just for the record, this woman is *not* a student here at Carolina Law. I would know, as I work here. Also, a search of the campus directory--not to mention Facebook--indicates no student by that name at the entire university. So, it looks like we've got a fake name, fake academic credentials, and by the looks of it, fake breasts.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:56 PM

As a female UNC law grad, I'm sorry that this woman has chosen this path when she clearly has other options. Still, I'm not sure how her individual decision impacts the quality of the law school or reflects who the students are anymore than Marc Dreier reflects the students at Harvard law andthe quality of the school.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:57 PM

Just when you think the horror of a legal marketplace permanently shrunk by some 30%, cannot get worse, you realise you are wrong, when (sickening) visions of the average law student/young lawyer turning to internet (or other) pornography to make ends meet, overwhelm you

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:57 PM

19 here. Re 24, maybe, but I'm 30 w/ no wrinkles. Her body rocks, but she's not taking care of her face and it shows. She was probably extremely pretty at 18, but it is catching up now.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:57 PM

32/35...she's a transfer from Ohio State, she is in fact a student there, but possibly under a different last name...

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:57 PM

SO ITS A FAKE???

STOP THE PRESSES!

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:58 PM

19 here. Re 24, maybe, but I'm 30 w/ no wrinkles. Her body rocks, but she's not taking care of her face and it shows. She was probably extremely pretty at 18, but it is catching up now.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:58 PM

Ditto 32. I can't find anybody who actually knows this girl.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:59 PM

Kash should investigate 32.

I went to Carolina for undergrad and definitely agree that neither of these girls do the school justice. That said, the law student had a pretty smokin' body.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:59 PM

I would love to splash

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:59 PM

32/35...she's a transfer from Ohio State, she is in fact a student there, but possibly under a different last name...she is on facebook as well....

looks like that tar heel education is really paying off when you can't even do a simple internet search and locate your own classmates...hope you have fun doing legal research later in life

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:00 PM

UNC Sucks. This girl looks like Tyler Hansbrough in drag.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:00 PM

I'd give her $100 for a good 30 minutes...

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:00 PM

The pictures of my secretary's kids makes me horny. Should I tell her?

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:00 PM

As a female UNC law grad, I'm sorry that this woman has chosen this path when she clearly has other options. Still, I'm not sure how her individual decision impacts the quality of the law school or reflects who the students are anymore than Marc Dreier reflects the students at Harvard law andthe quality of the school.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:03 PM

Couldn't get past the trashy face. Does that make me gay?

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:04 PM

Agree with @46. That is just Psycho T Hansbrough and his zany frat hijinks. I hope she/he gets Kirkland AIDS.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:05 PM

She's not hot...at all.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:06 PM

Fake name would make very good sense. Makes it a bit less easy to find once you've grown up (and, unless you're an insanely sucessful model, have to find another job).

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:06 PM

Stephanie -- Playboy doesn't generally accept overweight models. You're a bit heavy; a nice eating disorder would help with that!

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:06 PM

The video is now private.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:07 PM

Great body. OK face. If she makes the cut, Playboy's air-brushing will make her look like $1,000,000.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:10 PM

54- thanks for the info, I was wondering if they had created a plus-size issue or something !

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:10 PM

The pictures of my secretary's kids make me horny. Should I make her aware of this?

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:11 PM

what's the password for the video?

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:13 PM

55, that is what youtube is for.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:13 PM

what's the password for the video?

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:14 PM

the video appears to be password-protected- what is that?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:15 PM

Much as we try to teach our law students to be enterprising in this difficult economic climate, we cannot claim Stephanie Haney, whom you refer to as a 2L at UNC Law, as our own. We have no student registered by that name and cannot identify her as a student by any other name. We have notified the editors of the Daily Tar Heel, as well, of the error.
Best,
Maxine Eichner
Professor of Law
UNC School of Law

64 Posted by Dubya | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:16 PM

There are too many lawyers, so if she finds a different way to make a living, I'm all for it. As I've said before: “I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family.”

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:16 PM

The password is "cellulite"

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:17 PM

Much as we try to teach our law students to be enterprising in this difficult economic climate, we cannot claim Stephanie Haney, whom you refer to as a 2L at UNC Law, as our own. We have no student registered by that name and cannot identify her as a student by any other name. We have notified the editors of the Daily Tar Heel, as well, of the error.
Best,
Maxine Eichner
Professor of Law
UNC School of Law

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:21 PM

65 -

"Cellulite" didn't work as the password. Should I try "ugly white chicks?"

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:21 PM

Note to the "women" reading this post: real 2L or not, this is what the guy who climbs on top of you thinks of when he's with you. Truth.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:22 PM

The video is on the Daily Tar Heel. They must have protected it becuase they were pissed that ATL was getting all of their hits. Or the author/editors are friend with little miss porn star.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:24 PM

21 -- I'm going to feel great about myself as soon as I rub one out to these pictures

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:24 PM

66: Apparently not even professors at UNC are intelligent: look under Stephanie Shimek...

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:26 PM

I'm glad to hear this is a fake. I would be upset to think that UNC Law let in Florida St. grads. In every "Girls of the ACC" spread, the FSU girls are always the most willing to be the trashiest.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:26 PM

"Professor Eichner's teaching interests include sex equality, family law, employment discrimination, legal theory, and torts. She writes on issues of liberal theory, feminist theory, and family law. Her recent scholarship focuses on the stance that the state should take with respect to family ties among citizens."

Check her out - she is one hot mama! I'd like to get all up in her "feminist theory!"

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:27 PM

This girl is a moron. Posing for Girls of the ACC is a far cry from being asked to pose in Playboy. I knew some girls who posed in the Big Ten. Trust me: they're just happy to get a non-heffer who won't back out.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:30 PM

I entered "cockpunch" as the password and it put me right through. And then a midget in Tarheel blue ran under my desk and gave me a cockpunch. I guess thats what you call a two'fer.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:31 PM

First off, playboy does not contain the most beautiful women in the world. It contains a lot of dumb ditzes like this girl.

Second, its a sad state of affairs when our young girls think that posing for a pornographic magazine is an opportunity not to be missed.

28, why the distinction between hard core and soft core porn in your hiring decisions?

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:32 PM

I wish somebody would put together a calender featuring nothing but 3500 sq ft wives from Texas leaning over the hood of a Lexis.

That would make me all kinds

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:35 PM

Does anybody want to have softcore gay sex tonight in Bryant Park?

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:36 PM

72- you are a douchebag. Now go join the rest of the ugly "wine and cheese crowd" unc alums.

Oh yeah, your football team sucks, ya wanker.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:36 PM

i must concede - the south wins this won!

-ny lawyer who went to a ny law school

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:36 PM

there is no way eichner made that post

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:37 PM

She was also in a Hooter's competition. She worked at a Hooters in Morehead City, N.C.
http://www.indeonline.com/archive/x1470894630/Perry-grad-a-finalist-in-Hooters-competition

Thanks 71 for the real name.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:44 PM

Anyone wondering why we can use her name here? Why it isn't against the ATL no name policy? Its becuase she put herself out there. She didn't do something stupid and get caught, she decided to try appear naked in a magazine. That makes her fair game. Please Elie don't start removing posts, she did made her choice.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:47 PM

50 - No, that does not make you gay. But making out with guys in the men's room after 3 beers does. So cut it out.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:47 PM

If she makes the cut Playboy will definitely airbrush the hell out of that garish tattoo.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:48 PM

Why are people soliciting gay sex on this board? Is this what we have come to people? Really?

87 Posted by Barney Stinson | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:49 PM

I had a threesome with Stephanie Haney and her twin sister by telling them I was a Playboy Talent Coordinator.

It was AWESOME!

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:49 PM

Kash, your update is wrong, her credentials aren't fake, her name is. See post 71 and the link in 82. In the link it talked about her going into her 2L year at Ohio and working in NC but that was before she transfered to UNC. Fact check it. I look forward to another update. Also, I'm enjoying this post much more than the usual gloom and doom. Kudos.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:51 PM

actually, maybe they should airbrush her face a little - it's kinda gross

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:52 PM

if you guys think that girl is hot, there is something wrong with you. Tan plus huge boobs does not equal hot. She looks like a dude in the 2nd pic.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:52 PM

82, I take it she didn't win the Hooter's compentition? After all she wouldn't need the playboy money if she had the $50k.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:52 PM

39=71, read both posts: She's a transfer from Ohio State University to UNC...changed last name...its legit...lovely how her own classmates don't know who she is...

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:52 PM

86, See you at the last stall from the right. You will recognize me by my wide stance.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:53 PM

She is not fake!!!!!

She just accepted a summer offer from WolfBlock.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:54 PM

Fap, fap, fap, fap, fap.
Splooge.

That is all.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:54 PM

45 + 71 = truth. I knew her as a 1L. Nice girl.

If nobody at UNC even knows she goes there, what does that say for the ugly students?

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:54 PM

Can somebody say "implants?"

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:54 PM

19, how right you are - about both things you said.

(and i doubt that 19 is an ugly chick, 24. she's just go good sense. sounds like you might be about 20 pounds overweight and still ignorant about how to match your belt and shoes, though.)

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:54 PM

92 - agreed. Only goes to show that the ghost of Mweni Ekpo's clearly admits other morons to the school as well - transfers or not.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:58 PM

professor eichner absolutely did not make those posts

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:58 PM

Puttin' the D into JD.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:00 PM

94, how do you know she is going to WolfBlock? Also where are we on the "Haney" = Shimek rumor? From the link in 82 they do look a lot a like, and the dates match up with her transfering from Ohio to UNC 2L year . . .

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:00 PM

Maybe she's one of those Loyola 1L's who are trying to become 2L's at a better school. Too bad. No step up to UNC and no OCI.

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:01 PM

If I had sex with this girl a year ago, does that make me gay since in reality it is Tyler Hansbrough?

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:01 PM

Probably her maiden name. Her husband's a Marine.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:03 PM

UNC law grad here....as if you needed another reason besides (i) much lower tuition and (ii) a better basketball team to go to Carolina over Dook*

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:04 PM

WTF!! If Haney isn't a UNC law student, UNC should immediately admit her just to claim credit for her entrepreneurial insticts (as well as her other assets). Heck, unlike most of UNC's law students, at least Haney has marketable skills and is employable.

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:05 PM

Nice catch 105, I had not previously considered that possibility. Is she registered at UNC as "Shimek"?

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:06 PM

39/45/71 is a current 2L at OSU, knew her last year before she transferred out to UNC, changed her last name sometime in the process...the post is for real...

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:07 PM

31: Her name is really "Lexis". 'Nuff said.

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:07 PM

17--Are you kidding me?! Haney (and her vid) is why I *will* apply to UNC Law. You must be an ugly dike-mule.

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:07 PM

102: it's definitely true. Some people I've talked to think she got divorced. She kept a pretty low profile at school, believe it or not.

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:08 PM

umm husband who's a Marine looks decidedly metro...

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:09 PM

She's no KashLobster

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:10 PM

You're not missing much by not being able to watch the video. Yawn.

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:10 PM

There is a Shimek at UNC law. There is a resemblance but I am not convinced it is her - maybe its just the eye makeup.

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:11 PM

107: I'll take my $160k first-year salary and relatively low tuition bill and match your "no marketable skills or employable". Eat it.

c/o Carolina Law grad

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:12 PM

UNC student here..no stephanie haney here in the photo directory...however, there is someone under the other name posted above...haven't seen her at school though

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:12 PM

Hooter's is a gateway job, next is playboy, after that you have Hustler or getting nailed on a boat by a disease infested rock star. Sad way to go.

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:14 PM

Chick post giveaway = "Ewww, those are implants"

Memo: Guys dont care! Your "wanna see me put my nipple in my bellybutton" trick is not amusing.

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:14 PM

119, its always the quite ones you have to worry about . . .

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:14 PM

She can always gain about 150 pounds of weight to try to replace CWT '05 after CWT's fifth round of layoffs.

124 Posted by Baghdad Bob | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:15 PM

They are sick in their minds. They say they brought a Playboy bunny into the law school. I say to you this talk is not true. This is part of their sick mind.

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:16 PM

112--Divorced? Really?! So, do you think she'll go out with me? Would you ask her for me, please?

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:16 PM

Playboy "bunnies" were the waitresses at the long-lost Playboy Clubs. The women in the magazine are Playmates, if they're centerfolds, or just models, if featured elsewhere.

Of course, back when I read it, it was only for the articles, but hey, you pick up these details ...

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:17 PM

Update from the Tar Heel

Editor's Note: The last name of one of the students has been removed due to a previous agreement between the student...

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:17 PM

Agreed. A video of a certain KashLobster would be much better this sunny Friday afternoon.

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:19 PM

apparently this chick is in one of my classes, she's on the class roster, but she's not good looking enough for me to remember who she is....

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:20 PM

121 -- comment of the day

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:20 PM

127: Hey genius, don't you think it might be the girl called "Alexandria" who they reference in the article thats last name was removed. Stephanie "whoever" just used a fake last name...

avatar
132 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:21 PM

120 = Jealous

121 - I disagree. Fakes feel kinda hard, I'll take the smallest natural over any fake any day. Also, flat chicks work harder in bed (and fat chicks give better BJs): IT'S A FACT!

avatar
133 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:22 PM

118--Only a lowly UNC grad (along w/ Mike Nifong -- one of your illustrious co-alums) would be capable of such a lame response. I'll bet you can only *dream* of smoking-hot babes like Haney. Trust me, Haney will go much, much farther than you. $20 bucks says you're next in line for your firm's layoffs.

avatar
134 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:23 PM

The name removed from the DTH article was the other girl in the video, Alexandra. Not this chick.

avatar
135 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:23 PM

UNC porn star = not prestigious
3500 sq ft wife = priceless

avatar
136 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:25 PM

an update is forthcoming...wait for it...

avatar
137 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:26 PM

She is super hot.

avatar
138 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:27 PM

135 wrote:

"UNC porn star = not prestigious
3500 sq ft wife = priceless"

UNC law student/grad = unemployable / looking for work

After all, that's why they call it a "state" school....

avatar
139 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:28 PM

Dean is correct. UNC not real law school.

avatar
140 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:28 PM

Are we allowed to say "Ass Lobster" again without getting banned? Cause, I really liked saying "Ass Lobster" (please don't ban me!).

avatar
141 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:29 PM

check out this UNC law professor--the real life joker

http://www.law.unc.edu/faculty/directory/details.aspx?cid=52

avatar
142 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:31 PM

I can confirm that she IS a law student at UNC. She's in my Business Associations class. Ironically, she's in Professor Maxine Eichner's family law class!

I'm at 2L at UNC and I'm not sure how I feel about one of our law students being in playboy, but she should be allowed to make her own decisions within the law without her own Prof's making up some bogus story about her not being a student at UNC Law.

One thing we can all agree on: if one of her own Professors cannot even find her on the role (much less doesn't recognize one of her own students) she is incompetent and disconnected at best and a liar at worst. It is slightly embarrassing to me that a fellow law student may be in playboy and extremely embarrassing that we have professors like this at UNC.

avatar
143 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:32 PM

Shame, shame on UNC (and "Prof." Eichner in particular) for trying to disavow one of its own students (Haney). Incredibly galling is that UNC "law" school has still never disavowed itself from one of its most "notable" alums -- Mike Nifong -- who tried to engineer one of this generations most notorious frames. Nifong --and his ilk -- set back race relations at least one generation. And not a peep from UNC law school. Just disgusting.

avatar
144 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:33 PM

142: aren't 95% of law professors incompetent and disconnected?

avatar
145 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:33 PM

142--jeez, the girl gave a fake name. Give Eichner a break. And apparently she looks very different in these pictures than she does in real life.

avatar
146 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:34 PM

142: Ever consider that someone just posted that under the professor's name. You and ATL both bought it. Now, that's embarrassing.

avatar
147 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:35 PM

I would rather work at Kirkland Chicago and get AIDS there than have to go to UNC and look at swamp things like this.

avatar
148 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:36 PM

I can confirm that she IS a law student at UNC. She's in my Business Associations class. Ironically, she's in Professor Maxine Eichner's family law class!

I'm at 2L at UNC and I'm not sure how I feel about one of our law students being in playboy, but she should be allowed to make her own decisions within the law without her own Prof's making up some bogus story about her not being a student at UNC Law.

One thing we can all agree on: if one of her own Professors cannot even find her on the role (much less doesn't recognize one of her own students) she is incompetent and disconnected at best and a liar at worst. It is slightly embarrassing to me that a fellow law student may be in playboy and extremely embarrassing that we have professors like this at UNC.

avatar
149 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:37 PM

Not a fake name...rather a maiden name?: She was Shimek when she entered UNC but got divorced? recently...she's back to Haney on Facebook and no longer listed as married but rather as single...

If a prof really posted that she didn't go to UNC and Stephanie is in her class, that prof is a complete moron

avatar
150 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:38 PM

In addition to making palpably clear to the world her own sheer imcompetence, "Prof." Eichner's conduct reveals that she's clearly a dike as well.

With PC, agenda-driven hacks like Eichner on the UNC law faculty, God help students like Haney. Can anyone confirm that the UNC faculty abides by a grade-blind policy? If not, Haney will be just screwed by Eichner. That much is clear. If I'm Haney, I'm getting ready to sue UNC law and that Eichner bitch.

avatar
151 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:38 PM

So what is her real last name? Is is Haney or is it the other name? Are they the same person? Someone (preferably 142 but anyone will do) please explain this.

152 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:38 PM

Ms. Haney seems like a lovely and talented professional. I am sure she possess a fresh out of water attitude that would warrant a more intimate callback interview at the Ritz Carlton. Ms. Haney is an example of why firms should conduct on campus interviews at schools such as Pepperdine.

avatar
153 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:38 PM

I agree with 146. I had Prof Eichner in law school and the tone of that email does not even sound like her and I highly doubt she would post in the comments section here and identify herself.

avatar
154 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:39 PM

I agree with 146. I had Prof Eichner in law school and the tone of that email does not even sound like her and I highly doubt she would post in the comments section here and identify herself.

avatar
155 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:39 PM

Stephanie Shimek = Stephanie Haney...Stephanie Shimek was the married version, Haney is the new improved 2.0 and single version

avatar
156 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:39 PM

You can't find her because her is a he and he is Tyler Hansbrough and is playing in a little basketball tournament.

avatar
157 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:40 PM

Her last name was Shimek at OSU. That was her married name. I have no idea what her maiden name was. Haney is as likely as any.

avatar
158 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:42 PM

This whole incident is just whorific.

avatar
159 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:42 PM

142: If you would have read Prof. Eichner's comment carefully, as you are taught to do in law school, you will see that she only states that there is no Stephanie HANEY at the law school (where there is not), nor can they identify her (which is technically correct since the photo directory does not have a photo for Stephanie HANEY nor Stephanie Shimek). Prof. Eichner was correct in her statements. As for not recognizing one of her students, unless Prof. Eichner calls on Ms. Shimek or Ms. Shimek participates in discussion/sits on the first row, it is not so odd nor unforgivable that Prof. Eichner does not recognize her.

avatar
160 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:43 PM

the comment said we don't have a stephanie haney. we don't have a stephanie haney. the fact that "eichner" has a stephanie shimeck makes her comment no less true.

there are seven individuals named stephanie in the law school....how is eichner supposed to know? why would she assume that the first name is real but the last is not?

avatar
161 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:45 PM

Ok so now that we have the name/credentials debate figured out can we all go back to calling this girl some foul names? I'm not creative enough to come up with anything good but I think she has earned it.

avatar
162 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:46 PM

Is she hot in real life?

avatar
163 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:47 PM

159 = Prof. Eichner'

avatar
164 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:47 PM

I love Baghdad Bob!

avatar
165 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:48 PM

162: on weekends, yeah. She sleepwalks through class, though.

avatar
166 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:48 PM

To add to 159's comments. If this is indeed Stephanie Shimek, the photo's do not really look like her. I would not fault Prof Eichner for not recognizing this has her (if it is her).

avatar
167 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:48 PM

Well this is just about the worst way I could have been informed of this.

-Josh Shimek

avatar
168 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:49 PM

Professor Haney the Christmas Poo....

avatar
169 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:50 PM

63 Posted: " We have no student registered by that name and cannot identify her as a student by any other name."

If it was really posted by Maxine Eichner she performed a malpractice worthy search for Stephanie's other last name...

avatar
170 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:50 PM

We are all whores

avatar
171 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:51 PM

159: You are laughable. Stephanie not being a student at the law school is not "technically" correct: she attends the law school and is in the prof's class.

And as far as reading the prof's comments closely, I recommend you do that. "[We] cannot identify her as a student under any other name." How hard is it to do this? In the article it states she is a transfer from Ohio! UNC must have only had a few transfers this year, checking the list takes three seconds, and seeing the name Stephanie on this list takes another five (maybe 10 if you are a UNC law prof)

"We have notified the editors of the Daily Tar Heel, who originally reported this, as well, of the error."--If it is true that you cannot locate her on your list (or your own class attendance list), then you don't know if she is a student or not. Then how is it an error? An error worth contacting the Daily Tar Heel about (much less attaching your name to a moronic, false statement)?

avatar
172 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:51 PM

167, If that was a joke hilarious. If not I am sorry dude.

avatar
173 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:52 PM

Those of you who don't recognize her shouldn't be surprised. I went to school with her last year before she transferred out of OSU. She looks completely different when she isn't done up--and she rarely gets done up. I didn't know her well, but I did take notice when she was put together.

avatar
174 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:52 PM

bravo 167

avatar
175 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:53 PM

Why all the UNC haters? If she went to University of Michigan, she'd probably be selling her flesh.

avatar
176 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:54 PM

171--Is absolutely correct. Haney is obviously smarter than the good "prof." Eichner. What a joke--UNC is a law school worthy of hack idiots like Eichner.

BTW, are we talking about UNC or NCCU law school? Hard to tell any difference today.

avatar
177 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:55 PM

How can any straight dude miss those puppies hiding in her shirt? You couldn't hide them with a trench coat.

avatar
178 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:55 PM

1. Maxine Eichner (as the name would suggest) is a buz kill.

2. Anyone who as read the "bios" on the referse side of Playboy foldouts (actually, in my case not since age 13--but the impression at that time was indelible) knows that all of that shit is made up!!!

3. That is not to say that if Stephanie's nude photo actually makes it into the next generation of 13 year old’s father's bottom drawer (i.e. into the voracious paws of 13 year old boys everywhere) that an HONORARY UNC degree can be ruled out; surely even the dour Ms. Eichner could not rule THAT out?

In conclusion, and on behalf of 13 year old boys everywhere, GO Stephanie!!!!!!

avatar
179 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:55 PM

If Haney was her maiden name, wouldn't she likely have "H" as her middle initial in the directory. I guess she could have kept her real middle name?

avatar
180 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:59 PM

We are all little Eichner's.

avatar
181 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:00 PM

Folks,

If she does go into Playboy business, can she potentially be barred to enter the legal profession later as an attorney by state bar association(s) for violating the basic ethics and professional responsibility code? Just a thought.

avatar
182 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:01 PM

181--So long as she doesn't do anything illegal, no. Evidently, you were asleep in con law when your prof went over the first amendment (or, perhaps you were awake but had Eichner for con law).

avatar
183 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:02 PM

181,

You're an idiot.

avatar
184 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:02 PM

176 - you're totally right, i here they practically have to give out acceptances to yale and editor slots on yale law journal because all the smart folks go to a real law school.

avatar
185 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:02 PM

Whats unethical, is not sharing those puppies with the world.

avatar
186 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:02 PM

179: It really isn't worth speculating why a feminist professor would go out of her way to disown one of her own students. whether intentional or not, she really makes you question the value of a law degree if you make drunk, sloppy errors like this.

avatar
187 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:03 PM

I fucking laughed out loud at 167...WELL PLAYED

avatar
188 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:03 PM

Another famous Haney: http://www.law.berkeley.edu/php-programs/faculty/facultyProfile.php?facID=301

avatar
189 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:04 PM

181--You must be a UNC law student (or Eichner). Is freakin *everyone* this stupid at UNC?! UNC-TTT.

avatar
190 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:04 PM

That's it! Haney is Shimek! Shimek is Haney! Haney is a man!!!!

Oh, my GOD! Haney is a man!

*Starts chewing gum with Dan Marino*

avatar
191 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:08 PM

I'm really getting sick of this blog's consistent denigration of women within the legal community. Why aren't there articles about the various disgusting sexual exploits of male attorneys? Or hey, HOW ABOUT YOU NOT POST ANY OF THIS GARBAGE AT ALL.

avatar
192 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:09 PM

She would fit right in at Loyola Marymount, Pepperdine, or USC.

avatar
193 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:10 PM

191 = Josh Shimek

avatar
194 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:10 PM

Prof Eichner--she's in your 1:00 familiy law class.

195 Posted by Elie Mystal | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:11 PM

Thank you 190! That was just sitting there.
--Elie

avatar
196 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:13 PM

191= Little Eisner

197 Posted by The Man With The Axe | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:13 PM

Mr. and Mrs. Douglas:

Did you know that Eb has been rollin' in the hay with my daughter, Stephanie?

avatar
198 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:14 PM

167 - Sorry dude, time to look to your own gender for satisfaction

avatar
199 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:14 PM

167 - Sorry dude, time to look to your own gender for satisfaction

avatar
200 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:14 PM

Well, we may have PC, femi-nazi, agendra-driven moronic hacks on our faculty and our law school might be garbage, but at least UNC can seriously 'ball-up' on the NCAA dance floor. That counts for something, right? Also, just ignore the idiots that teach (and, evidently, disown) us and focus on our smoking-hot law students!

avatar
201 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:15 PM

190 - is that an ace ventura reference. gak.

avatar
202 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:18 PM

191: Double racist for using the "N" word and using the prifex "de" in front of it to make it even worse.

avatar
203 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:20 PM

202: Laugh out loud! I'm in class man, how can you do that to me.

avatar
204 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:20 PM

Is UNC is trying to improve its US News ranking by parading its lovely students? Well, it will probably work. Anyway, sure beats trying to provide something even remotely resembling a quality legal education.

avatar
205 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:23 PM

167, thanks ass, I just laughed out loud in class, then got called on.

avatar
206 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:26 PM

205--What kind of loser actually attends Friday afternoon classes? You must be at UNC. Best on that job search, fella.

avatar
207 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:34 PM

Wow, reading these comments explains why lawyers have such a bad name. I would love to know where all of you who denigrate UNC went to school. I assume not anywhere higher ranked b/c then you wouldn't feel the need to criticize an entire law school for the choice of one student who may or may not actually attend the school.

avatar
208 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:37 PM

207 - Shut up. Fatty.

avatar
209 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:38 PM

You people need to get real. Playboy pays a good chunk of money for about an hour's worth of posing. It's better than selling your soul for $200 an hour.

Plus, its stupid to argue that there's anything immoral about using one part of your body to earn a living rather than using another part. You use what you've got. Especially in this sh1t economy.

avatar
210 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:38 PM

208: HAHA

avatar
211 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:40 PM

207--Stanford Law ('92), not that it matters all that much (but since you specifically asked).

And, BTW, moron, my critique of UNC (TTT) flows from how the school--though Prof. Eichner--tried to distance itself from one of its own students. Just repulsive, and Eichner's idiotic conduct smears the entire UNC community (hell, she's in Eichner's family law class for Christ sake--is Eichner really that stupid and/or venal?!). Candidly, I have a hell of a lot more respect for Haney than the UNC faculty and administration.

avatar
212 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:40 PM

208, thanks for proving my point.

avatar
213 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:45 PM

I would deposit my semen in, on, or around her.

Does that make me not gay?

avatar
214 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:46 PM

Two pathetic things here:

1. A '92 grad feels the need to call schools TTT on ATL. 211, you are in your 40's and old.

2. Some loser at UNC read about this girl in the student newspaper, then immediately emailed ATL to "break the story."

avatar
215 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:47 PM

207 - first, welcome to ATL. Any excuse to act like an elitist douchebag will be jumped on by multiple posters, immediately. Second, no one's bashing UNC because a 2L wants to pose in Playboy. Actually, I think many of the posters have been very encouraging of this decision. Any criticism stems from the faculty email and compounded by the fact that the 2L is apparently in the prof's class.

avatar
216 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:48 PM

I had sex with a platypus once.

Does this make me gay?

avatar
217 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 4:49 PM

167, that was the first time that I can remember laughing out loud because of a blog comment. Like 205, it got me busted, as well. Still, it was worth it.

avatar
218 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:00 PM

167 wins

211 is maybe the biggest loser reading and posting on a law blog (that is really, really sad)

avatar
219 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:00 PM

167 wins

211 is maybe the biggest loser reading and posting on a law blog (that is really, really sad)

avatar
220 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:00 PM

Donovan going to Kentucky? Really?

avatar
221 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:02 PM

Beat up face + fake boobs + bleached hair + make up =
skank ho with a beat up face.

Beat up face + fake boobs + bleached hair + make up + LAW DEGREE =

BEST THING TO EVER TO HAPPEN TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW.

avatar
222 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:03 PM

214--OK, I am in my 40s and, as you write, "old." But, perhaps more salient is that I'm on the hiring committee at a "BigLaw" Wall Street firm -- a firm, BTW, that is among the precious few actively interviewing and hiring (fewer summer slots, however). And I just "crossed UNC off" my list of acceptable feeder law schools. Seriously. Our firm is lucky in that we can pick and choose from the nation's best law schools. Candidly, due to time and budget constraints, we're always looking for pretty much any reason *not* to go to yet another marginal law school's OCI. Well, I just found my reason (and you can thank Prof. Eichner).

The most I'll do for UNC is a potential phone interview (10 minute screener) and *only* for Haney--and only if she's law review. You doubt me?--check with your placement office soon.

--One "old" attorney

avatar
223 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:03 PM

216-

Did the platypus have on small cardo jean shorts (c'jorts) or capris, and go to NYU law?

avatar
224 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:06 PM

If you're going to lie about going to law school, at least lie about going to the best, like Yale or Columbia.

avatar
225 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:07 PM

king and spalding sucks - oh, wait, this isn't king and spalding ... who cares, they still suck. they are pushing start dates for new associates to jan 2010. also heard partners are taking pay cuts of up to 10%

avatar
226 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:10 PM

222, name the firm or go home.

avatar
227 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:10 PM

Fo real?

avatar
228 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:10 PM

222 - I'm pretty sure that, if you did interview Carolina Law students, you would have trouble hiding your pathological narcissism. And, as we here in the South have principles and would prefer to find fulfilling work rather than whore ourselves to fanatical, autocratic partners at TTT firms who have gone through three wives and probably a few 15 year old boys, you would have considerable difficulty hiring us anyway.

avatar
229 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:12 PM

226--Yeah, right. Oh, wait, OK, I'll name "the" firm: Cravath. Good night, kids....

avatar
230 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:17 PM

I love how law students and other various losers love to play "pretend" in the comments section. Right, hiring partner. Sure. People's use of the anonymity of the internet is truly pathetic.

So is this law blog for churning out an offensive and derogatory post in the name of getting more hits. David Lat, I hope someone at one of your numerous whoring sessions - ahem law school "talks" - calls you out on this garbage during the "Q&A." I used to read this blog years ago for its great legal gossip and pretty reliable advance scoops. Now it's just a shoddy collection of 3-4 unreliable posts written, and commented upon, by retard law students with the maturity levels of 12 year olds. When WSJ is getting the scoop faster than you are, you've definitely jumped the shark. Congrats, David. I hope you're enjoying the clear view of your crumbling empire (and reputation) from your pinnacle of douchebaggery.

avatar
231 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:17 PM

I love how law students and other various losers love to play "pretend" in the comments section. Right, hiring partner. Sure. People's use of the anonymity of the internet is truly pathetic.

So is this law blog for churning out an offensive and derogatory post in the name of getting more hits. David Lat, I hope someone at one of your numerous whoring sessions - ahem law school "talks" - calls you out on this garbage during the "Q&A." I used to read this blog years ago for its great legal gossip and pretty reliable advance scoops. Now it's just a shoddy collection of 3-4 unreliable posts written, and commented upon, by retard law students with the maturity levels of 12 year olds. When WSJ is getting the scoop faster than you are, you've definitely jumped the shark. Congrats, David. I hope you're enjoying the clear view of your crumbling empire (and reputation) from your pinnacle of douchebaggery.

avatar
232 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:18 PM

228--Well, we've never had any trouble converting our offers to Duke students. And, last I checked, Duke was still, as you put it, "in the South." Trust me, in today's market you need us far, far more than we need you. That is, if you harbor any hope whatsoever in actually practicing law.

Now, I need to head back home to my third wife....

avatar
233 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:22 PM

228, "difficulty hiring us anyway." Are you serious, man? No difficulty here--I'll take any f'in job offer I can scrounge up. Any offer.

avatar
234 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:30 PM

She's not hot.

BTW The trashy hot state school girls get their MRS degrees undergrad and don't have to go to law school. The trashy hot girls that can't get in state schools go to community college and become cosmetologists and strippers. The trashy hot ones that can't get into community college go into porn or advertise their services on Craigslist under erotic services, W4M.

Life's just that simple when you're trashy hot and stupid.

avatar
235 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:30 PM

222, you are so awesome that you can just cross off law schools. I hope to be just like you when I grow up.

avatar
236 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:31 PM

Playboy is forerunner in the fight for free speech in America and spends millions of dollars each year on legal fees dealing with copyright, defamation, and constitutional issues. Shimek may not land a spot in the magazine or the mansion, but she seems to have set herself up nicely for a spot in the OGC. Enough with the elitist attitudes-- you all buy the magazine and read it at the office.

avatar
237 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:37 PM

Dook is part of New Jersey. Don't kid yourself.

avatar
238 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:40 PM

Give the girl a break. It's not like she was banned from school buildings for having oral sex, using cocaine or defacing a giraffe sculpture.

avatar
239 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:42 PM

232: Duke is not in the South. Its a section of New Jersey that's been eroneously uplifted and placed down in Durham, NC. Further, Duke students (with some rare exceptions) are a perfect match for your "prestigious" firm.

And for the last time, you all are the most gullible people for thinking that a law professor from UNC would "post" that statement on this blog....have you ever heard of a "flame"...have you ever read ATL for that matter.

avatar
240 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:47 PM

I don't understand what this has to do with Boies Schiller

avatar
241 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:54 PM

Flame
I'm gonna live forever
I'm gonna learn how to fly
High

I feel it coming together
People will see me and cry
Flame

I'm gonna make it to heaven
Light up the sky like a flame
Flame!!!!

avatar
242 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 6:01 PM

Sorry. She is very attractive.

avatar
243 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 6:01 PM

Stephanie: There are far too many females who will question your decision because they are not, shall we say, in a position to pose in Playboy themselves. Do not worry about your future law career. Hiring committees are dominated by male partners who will jump at the chance to hire you.

In this economical climate, a poor decision would be to not take advantage of an opportunity to better your financial situation. As a female attorney who has spent eleven years in the practice of law, I promise that it is a lonely career where you will forever be underappreciated. If you can make good money via another route, I say more power to you. Best of luck to you and keep your head held high.

avatar
244 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 6:19 PM

Why does ATL continue reporting on irrelevant law firms and schools? Non T-14 schools need to be shut down for the sake of everyone, and it doesn't help that you recognize their existence.

avatar
245 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 6:24 PM

lap dance!

avatar
246 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 6:25 PM

Hot body, nasty face.

avatar
247 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 6:45 PM

Tip for current and future attention whores: just own up to it. No one really minds an attention whore, so long as you just admit you like the attention. We only really laugh at you when you make excuses and refuse to call it for what it is.

Also: playboy has the most beautiful women in the world?!?! HAHAHAHA.

avatar
248 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 7:42 PM

Love her tattoo!

249 Posted by Kirk Lazarus | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 8:28 PM

I'd drink her Booty Sweat any day.

avatar
250 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 9:06 PM

22/28 - you hire for law firms and you don't think this stupid bitch posing in Playboy will hurt your chances? And you would have thought of doing it as well? WTF - there's professionalism and there's posing in Playboy showing everything off. I'm a guy and I know full well that I ever wound up working with this chick, we'd all have that Playboy in our possession. What is wrong with you?

avatar
251 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 9:11 PM

She just got divorced? What trash - and now she's posing in Playboy huh? if anyone in UNC law fucked her, PLEASE LET US KNOW and how it was!

avatar
252 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 11:07 PM

Partner Emeritus: You were sorely missed.

avatar
253 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 11:25 PM

251, you know they say that pretty girls (or girls who think they are) don't try as hard in bed? She is no exception. I've seen more active fish in the freezer section.

-UNC 3L

avatar
254 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, March 28, 2009 12:58 AM

244 = racist.

avatar
255 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, March 28, 2009 5:50 AM

253 = racist

avatar
256 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, March 28, 2009 5:45 PM

Bodacious ta-tas!

avatar
257 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 29, 2009 1:26 PM

Still nothing compared to Villanova's famous law grad:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Zdrok

avatar
258 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 29, 2009 1:27 PM

Still nothing compared to Villanova's famous law grad:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Zdrok

avatar
259 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 29, 2009 2:34 PM

Stephanie Haney is not a current student (1, 2 or 3L) at UNC School of Law. There is actually no one with the last name of Haney associated with the law school, staff, faculty or student.

avatar
260 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 29, 2009 3:20 PM

It's gettin' hot in here (so hot)
So take off all your clothes
(I am gettin' so hot, I'm gonna take my clothes off)

avatar
261 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 29, 2009 5:28 PM

Nothin' gayer than Duke! And to the Stanford 1992 retard, you have NO business sense if you cross a school off your list because of one jackass professor. Talk about an idiot. It makes me laugh just to think of how stupid you are!!

avatar
262 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 29, 2009 6:18 PM

259, wow, you are a complete idiot. Read the other article about this topic, or any of the comments above yours. You're ignorance is impressive. This shit was figured out by Friday afternoon. Go crawl into a hole somewhere. Asshat.

avatar
263 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, March 30, 2009 6:18 PM

Just wondering why someone decided that the top 14 schools are the relevant ones. Sounds like a Georgetown conspiracy...

avatar
264 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:33 AM

check her out in the 2003 Hooters competition. first Hooters, then UNC, now Playboy. At least she won't have to worry about being taken seriously as a lawyer.

http://www.indeonline.com/archive/x1470894630/Perry-grad-a-finalist-in-Hooters-competition

avatar
265 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 1, 2009 1:13 PM

As a 3L at UNC I do agree that this was probably not the best decision ever. And yes, she does actually go to UNC. I am disappointed, however, at the unkind words being said about someone none of you know. Just because you have a law degree, most likely from a second rate school, doesn't mean you have a license to be an asshole. Congratulations attorneys! You make the rest of us proud to be joining such a noble profession.

Post Your Comment