Add RSS RSS

Weil Gotshal Almost Sets the Market With Incoming First Year Associate Deferral Dollars

Weil.gifAlmost a month ago, Latham & Watkins set the market in terms of incoming first year deferral programs Latham offered $75K to associates who saw their start dates with the firm pushed back for a year.

Many firms have followed, but none have topped. Today, Weil, Gotshal & Manges is taking a run at Latham’s high water mark.

A tipster reports sent us a Weil memo that announces the firm’s new deferred start date program. It’s a bit complicated. Weil is pushing back the start date for all incoming associates until January, 2010. But, in addition to bar expenses, the firm will be paying associates $15,000 in September 2009. That is more than anybody else who has deferred start dates to the first of the year.

But Weil is also asking associates to volunteer for have their start dates pushed back until January, 2011. Yes, I said “2011.” That would be longer than any firm (at this point) is asking its incoming first years to wait. However, if associates push back until 2011, Weil will give you $75,000 — if you work for a firm approved public interest organization — on top of the $15K they will receive in September, 2009. Should an associate choose not to work for that time, Weil will offer $60,000 (on top of the initial $15K).

That is not all that is happening over at Weil today. More details after the jump.

Weil is also scaling back its summer program from 12 weeks to 10 weeks. There are any number of firms who are moving to a ten week program. However, here’s an interesting wrinkle. If you were already scheduled to work the full 12 weeks at Weil, the firm give you $1,500 in make good money. So, really, in terms of pay, Weil summers are only losing half 3/4 of a paycheck, instead of a full one.

And for what it’s worth, that $1,500 will be mailed to you next week. Spring break baby!

One sobering note (yes, let’s pretend that there is only one sobering note when a firm asks 3Ls to delay until 2011): the memo notes that the management committee is considering all of its options to avoid attorney layoffs. I wonder if this will affect Weil in its match-up with Cleary in the Safest Firms bracket?

But, layoffs haven’t happened yet, so let’s think about that tomorrow. This is starting to look like the salary wars of halcyon days long past. This morning Clifford Chance gave $10,000 for people pushed back until January 2010, and Weil comes right back with $15,000. Are all the firms that didn’t offer any extra money to people who were pushed back to January going to have to revisit that decision and offer their deferred first years a little something more than “bar expenses?” If everybody can play follow the leader on the way down, surely the door must swing both ways.

Cross the streams boys.

Weil Deferral.pdf

Earlier: Is Latham Setting Precedent?
Prior ATL coverage of start dates
Prior ATL coverage of deferral stipends

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:43 PM

FIRST. O'DOYLE RULES!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:44 PM

This is really bad news. I figured Weil was one of THE safest places.

3 Posted by The Dow Is Up Guy | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:44 PM

The Dow is up 21% off bear market lows meaning that we literally are in a bull market. Our good friend the NASDAQ is up for the year! Firms, the recession is over - theses deferrals make you look foolish.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:44 PM

This is bizarre. Firms used to compete on how much they could (over)pay first years to work for them, and now they're competing on how much they can pay first years NOT to work for them??

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:45 PM

Woah. Kind of shocking for Weil to do this.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:45 PM

Weil to $75k!

(for not working until 2011)

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:47 PM

B-b-b-but Weil is so safe it???? IT HAS A LARGE BANKRUPTCY PRACTICE!!!! THIS IS UNPOSSIBLE!

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:47 PM

holy shit

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:48 PM

WHY would they post this before they told the first years.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:48 PM

I just got a hand job from the girl who works at Hot Topic.

I am Prestige

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:49 PM

Guys they are leveraged as all hell and a 2nd tier firm to boot. This shouldn't be a surprise.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:49 PM

They're losing three-quarters of a paycheck, not half -- $1500 is, in fact, not half of $6000.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:49 PM

Way to not tell the incoming 2009 class yet... thanks Weil

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:49 PM

Way to not tell the incoming 2009 class yet... thanks Weil

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:50 PM

Deferred until 2011 = fired with severance

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:50 PM

Way to not tell the incoming 2009 class yet... thanks Weil

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:50 PM

Isn't $1500 to work 10 weeks instead of 12 only a recovery of 1/4 of lost pay? Summers at Weil are paid $3000+ per WEEK not per paycheck, so two weeks less equals $6000+. Unless there is some reduction in pay scale that ATL forgot to report?

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:51 PM

Way to not tell the incoming 2009 class yet... thanks Weil

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:51 PM

none HAVE topped.

not

none OF topped.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:51 PM

"none of topped"? Jesus.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:52 PM

Way to not tell the incoming 2009 class yet... thanks Weil

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:52 PM

This is the scariest news ever - I thought Weil was busy with its bankruptcy practice? If Weil is doing this, basically every firm is in trouble...

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:52 PM

none HAVE topped.

not

none OF topped.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:52 PM

hey MysTTTal, $1500 is not half of $6000.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:52 PM

You call this plan complicated. Earlier today, you called Clifford Chance's plan complicated as well. I'm not sure how dumb you are, Elie, but how are either of these complicated?

And no, $1,500 is not half of $6,000 you fat moron.

Can't you do anything right?

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:53 PM

Weil truly is the safest firm, if by safe you mean not safe at all.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:53 PM

what?

you mean the incoming 2009 class did not know?

not sure i got the message. please clarify.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:53 PM

This is the scariest news ever - I thought Weil was busy with its bankruptcy practice? If Weil is doing this, basically every firm is in trouble...

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:53 PM

WTF - People with zero expierence are gettting paid $75K to sit at home. While expierenced attorney's can't even get a position for $75K. Is this a joke.???

It makes the severance packages out there look like crap.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:55 PM

"Many firms have followed, but none of topped. "

I can't believe none OF topped. It's inconceivable!

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:55 PM

22,

No, "aliens are coming to earth to ravage every human orifice" is the scariest news ever. This is merely inconvenient.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:55 PM

28 - You had your chance and you failed at life. Dems da breaks.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:57 PM

Why did I have to find this out from ATL. Why:(

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:57 PM

This ruins my bracket.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:57 PM

1. take the $15 + $60k.
2. get bartending gig.
3. ???
4. Profit!

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:57 PM

Why did I have to find this out from ATL. Why:(

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:57 PM

Leave Elie alone. He is already fat and black.
If no white man wants to be Chris Rock, even though he is skinny and rich, how do you think Elie feels?

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:58 PM

fuck.. this is horrible news..

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:00 PM

For $60K, I'd gladly travel the world for a year.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:00 PM

NYC to January 2013!!!

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:01 PM

4 - hahaha, awesome... this is getting a little crazy. New rumor that BigLaw is going to pay 3Ls $200,000 to just go away and never come back and aspiring lawyers $100,000 to not go to law school.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:01 PM

Ropes offered $20k upon graduation w/ deferred start date of Jan 2010, which tops Weil's $15k...

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:02 PM

OH GOD, NO, THIS IS HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!

Why, oh Lord do you forsake us, WHYYYYYYYYY!!!!

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:02 PM

Ropes offered $20k upon graduation w/ deferred start date of Jan 2010, which tops Weil's $15k...

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:03 PM

Sorry to say this Elie, but at as an African American you are really making the rest of us look bad!

Just proof read before sending things out! Sigh

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:04 PM

Why is everyone so shocked that a firm with a strong bankruptcy practice is delaying start dates? It's not like Weil only practices bankruptcy. According to NALP, the vast majority of the associates in Weil's NYC office work in either corp or lit. Only 19 partners in the NYC office practice bankruptcy, so it's not like they could place all 150+ new associates in bankruptcy practice.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:04 PM

Ropes offered a salary advance, not a stipend. Way different.

Also, Ropes is making its 3Ls work for the $60k. Weil is letting them travel.

No comparison here - Weil wins. (Although Weil is way more leveraged than Ropes. Ropes might be safer?)

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:04 PM

Why is everyone so shocked that a firm with a strong bankruptcy practice is delaying start dates? It's not like Weil only practices bankruptcy. According to NALP, the vast majority of the associates in Weil's NYC office work in either corp or lit. Only 19 partners in the NYC office practice bankruptcy, so it's not like they could place all 150+ new associates in bankruptcy practice.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:04 PM

Are you still eligible for that sweet Weil $$$ if you haven't passed/taken the bar or graduated from law school? Thx.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:04 PM

Why is everyone so shocked that a firm with a strong bankruptcy practice is delaying start dates? It's not like Weil only practices bankruptcy. According to NALP, the vast majority of the associates in Weil's NYC office work in either corp or lit. Only 19 partners in the NYC office practice bankruptcy, so it's not like they could place all 150+ new associates in bankruptcy practice.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:06 PM

Ropes offered a 20K salary advance, Weil is offering a 15K stipend. BIG difference.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:06 PM

What should the 2010 class expect if the 2009 class is deferred to 2011?

Would be awkward to get the 2010 kids starting at the firm before the 2009 class, what a way to doom morale for years.

God, this is an awful news, but this definitely shows that NO firm is safe irrespective of any contests run on ATL. Anyone trying to argue that X is safer than Y is probably not working in a biglaw firm.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:06 PM

Just a random question about all of these 3L deferral programs generally -- do you get firm health insurance coverage when you're on your deferral year?

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:07 PM

Ropes offered a 20K salary advance, Weil is offering a 15K stipend. BIG difference.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:08 PM

Here is an idea. The firms who are not paying anything for deferring should stick with that plan. Maybe the firms should hold onto the cash and think about the long term. Even if they lose a class or two, there will be more down the road to fill the jobs. If there are those that don't want to wait, let them jump. It is tough out here in the real world. Maybe having an offer six months later than expected is not so bad. Its time to lower expectations to reality.

Firms will be financially stronger if they would stop throwing cash at inexperienced employees. Use the extra money to train them once they come in. Also, maybe they can hire extra people so that billables do not have to be so high.

Here is an opportunity to change the legal profession for the better.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:09 PM

people who placed their faith in weil = TTT

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:10 PM

shut up 55. you clearly dont have law school debt

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:10 PM

Here's an idea, 55: why don't you TTToss my salad?

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:11 PM

Weil is NOT mailing the $1500 next week (for the summer program)...the email specifically says that it is NOT an advance our or salary

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:11 PM

Ropes is offering full medical, dental, and eye insurance for deferring 3Ls

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:12 PM

Weil is NOT mailing the $1500 next week (for the summer program)...the email specifically says that it is NOT an advance on our salary

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:12 PM

Question: Will this affect their class year for salary purposes? If the class of 2009 starts in 2010, will they be on the same salary scale as the class of 2010? Will 2010 be their stub year or will they have no stub year in effect?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:12 PM

45- "Proofread" is one word. Apparently Elie's not the only one...

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:14 PM

59 is right -- there's nothing in the email to 2009 SAs saying that the $1500 is coming this week.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:15 PM

46/48/50 is right. To answer your question though, it's because nearly everyone on here is an ignorant law student who knows nothing about firm practice or about Weil. Their bankruptcy practice is top-notch and has been very hyped recently, but it's like 10% of the firm's business. A 10% hedge is nice, but that's all it is -- a hedge.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:15 PM

Question:

How do some of you know which firms are more leveraged than others?

- D.S.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:15 PM

55 = 1L whose admissions essay was about his yearning desire to do public interest work and help the downtrodden.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:17 PM

looks like this is only the ny office because we never got that email/memo in DC.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:18 PM

66- See:

http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202426909972

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:19 PM

No associate in any law firm is SAFE! The only way to survive is to: (1) bill 2300 hours a year; or (2) have your own clients. PERIOD. ENOUGH SAID.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:19 PM

43-

Assuming there is a god, why would he/she/it care about you? You are a lawyer. You traded your soul for Prestige.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:21 PM

the dc office is really slow

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:21 PM

ok, let's take a step back and look at developments from a macro perspective. Deferrals, whether subsidized or not, are likely in the end to result in a substantial reduction of the number of associates joining Weil or other BigLaw firms in the next 1--2 years. Combined with attorney layoffs and unusually aggressive "performance reviews," we're looking at thousands of academically high performing law students, and young legal talent good enough to have attracted BigLaw offers in the past, who are seeking other employment. Some will wind up pursuing career opportunities in other fields but many, if not most ,are likely to be part of a gradually developing talent shift to smaller firms which now have an opportunity to attract a higher caliber of student and attorney than in the past---better researchers, writers, future rain makers,etc. This development , over time, in combination with the breakup or contraction (at the partner level) of larger firms, may well result in the growth of a new group of "boutique" firms which will be able to expand in an economically rational manner and ultimately compete effectively for business with BigLaw entities. Sort of a brain drain effect, which may result in a much larger price being paid by the larger firms which are now shedding talent than anything they've factored into their calculators.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:22 PM

55 = Hope & Change

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:22 PM

63 - You LOSER, since proof & read are two separate words they can be used apart (did you learn about compound words in the first grade- or did you go to a TTT elementary school in addition to the law school you attended?) Oh wait let me guess...you are now one of the people standing on the breadline. Ha ha..IDIOT!

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:23 PM

Jones Day just pushed back start dates to late Oct for all offices.

-Girl with unanticipated 2 month break beginning in Sept.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:26 PM

45: Shut the fuck up.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:27 PM

i'm slammed and i'm in the dc office, #72. this is the first break from meetings/calls/etc i've been able to have since 8am this morning.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:28 PM

I would happily take only $50,000 not to work for Weil for a year. Where do I sign up?

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:29 PM

77= Elie

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:30 PM

I love how some commenters feel that Elie "makes all African-Americans look bad" while simultaneously believing that people should be judged as individuals and eschew racial politics. Newsflash: stop saying/believing dumb shit like 45 and racial politics will go away. Morons...

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:33 PM

Wow. If Weil is deferring, then NOBODY will be starting in 2009. Milbank needs to announce something already!

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:33 PM

80: 77 and 81 here. Kiss my ass.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:34 PM

First of all, Weil is a top ten firm so this is scary and troubling. Second, they aren’t leveraged so it is curious as to why they are making these cuts. But at the end of the day, it's a business.....

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:36 PM

75: What a moran you are. 63 was clearly and obviously referring to the use of the words IN CONTEXT. ANd he/she is entirely correct. You, on the other hand, come off as a half-wit who is trying to be 'clever' but who failed miserably.

With your reasoning and interpersonal skills, you will never get that permanent offer once your deferral runs out. Better practice bartending now and get a jump on your new career.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:37 PM

84 - Weil actually is leveraged a lot - check the chart that is pasted above. According to that chart, they're the 7th highest leveraged firm out of the Am Law 100

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:37 PM

ok, it was JUST emailed to all DC associates and counsel!

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:38 PM

84, if by "not leveraged" you mean they're ranked #7 in terms of leverage at 5.7 lawyers per partner, then your post is correct.

http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202426909972

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:38 PM

Wow, $75k to do nothing for over a year, or $90k to work in public interest. A no-brainer imo.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:38 PM

Ok, i didn't read the details too closely so I may be getting this wrong. But $75k to do nothing for a year and a half, except study for the bar? I'll gladly take the bar again, in any state, for that kind of deal. How do I get in on this.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:41 PM

Ropes & Gray isn't high on that law.com leverage list. Why are they having to defer start dates? Just not a good firm?

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:42 PM

I'll take it! Wow you people are spoiled. Pay me not to work for you... Okay! I can do that!

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:43 PM

I thought the recession was over.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:43 PM

Ropes isn't leveraged highly, but (a) they've had huge summer classes of late, (b) they haven't done layoffs, and have said they're not doing layoffs anytime soon, (c) have a big PE practice, and (d) are generally just really conservative.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:44 PM

90 - i think you need to have good grades and be a huge douchebag

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:44 PM

My guess is that most 3Ls will turn down the deferral. Which provides better job security: to start working and building relationships or to keep standing outside the door looking in?

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:46 PM

81, 77- The point is not, nor has it ever been that racial politics will go away. Instead, the point is that if you have a job you should do it i.e., read an article before you publish it.

I'm sorry that this is hard for you to digest...but you seem to be missing the point. Why don't you stick to your breadline politics and you should be just fine collecting your unemployment checks.
45, 75, 80

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:47 PM

why not defer for decades?

fucking moronic to "predict" demand 2 years out

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:47 PM

95 - I have the good grades. And for money i can be a huge douchebag. Isn't that what lawyering is all about?

90

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:48 PM

does this apply to incoming clerks as well?

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:48 PM

What happens if someone takes the $75,000, gets another job, and does not want to come back in January 2011? Is the stipend conditioned on actually working for the firm?

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:51 PM

Of course nobody will take the deferral. And when January comes around and the DOW is back below 6,000, then Weil will send around another memo.

WE ARE ALL FUCKED BEYOND BELIEF.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:51 PM

Weil is not leveraged, like whatsoever.

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:52 PM

85=63

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:53 PM

102= Paul Krugman

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:53 PM

100 - that wouldn't make sense. Why would a firm pay $75-90k for someone with clerk experience, when they can pay the same to someone who hasn't even graduated from law school?

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:55 PM

To all the Weil sh!tfaces at my T5 law school who have been acting smug throughout all the bad news about everyone else's firms: HAHAHAHAHA!!!

I hate smug people. I mean, seriously. Luck of the draw that some students CHOSE a job there (and let's be honest, we get to choose), there's all this good "bankruptcy" and PPP news. They walk around with this smug "heard about your firm...sorry". I have news for you: Weil is not hard to get a job at (if you go to a T5), they are just as f-ed as everyone else, and you are not better than anyone cause you picked at random one of the faceless law firms that comes and throws their summers/jobs/slavery at us each year.

BWA HA HA HA HA HA

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:55 PM

WGM class of 09'rs:

75k buys a whole hella lot on Soi Cowboy

-BKK Rockstar

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:59 PM

Did anyone read the post (except for typos)? The $75k is for work at "a firm approved public interest organization". Not for sitting at home in your momma's basement.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:59 PM

Weil has no debt. Eat it.

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:01 PM

97: Your "point" is absolutely valid. But your own words betray your point:

"Sorry to say this Elie, but at as an African American you are really making the rest of us look bad!"

You can't clean that up. Thus, my point stands. If you feel that Elie embarrasses you because you happen to be African-American, then, sadly, you're just as racist as some of the other pricks who post on here.

As for me...I'm quite comfortable in my biglaw job. I suspect, however, you may have a problem retaining yours (if you have one) based on your "so-big-I-can-drive-a-truck-through-it" grammar mistake in post 45 (ironically criticizing Elie for doing the same thing...go figure).

Fuck off.

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:02 PM

107= my new best friend.

- fellow T5er who knows what's up.

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:02 PM

107 = Latham 2009 Summer Associate at CLS

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:02 PM

I find this quite amusing considering my V100 ("TTT") firm hasn't frozen salaries or fired associates (publicly at least) and continues to maintain its late-September start date. So much for that "prestige" factor of the V25.

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:03 PM

This doesn't seem to apply to all of their offices...

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:06 PM

107 - I feel bad for those who actually researched firms and picked weil because everyone said it was safe.

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:08 PM

Here I was thinking that the market will be pretty strong by the time I finally enter in fall of 2011... now I'm starting to think that these huge deferrals are going to hurt my class.

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:10 PM

117; yes, they are. One of two things has to happen (because most firms will not be in a position to take on the incoming AND deferred classes)...either your class gets the boot, or the deferred associates are told to move on.

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:10 PM

when is my kirkland start date??? this is starting to get ridiculous.

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:11 PM

119 - if you haven't heard yet it's because your offer was rescinded. others have already heard.

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:14 PM

When is Milbank going to announce start dates already? This is getting out of hand.

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:15 PM

111- I do have a BigLaw job- oh but here's the thing, it doesn't involve writing articles. Rather, it involves advising my clients on various issues, writing briefs, and attending court among other things- all of which I do quite well-hence my 2100 hours billed last year, my bonus, and oh the fact that I have RETAINED my job.

So you'll have to excuse me for trying to squeeze in a quick post reminding Elie of what his job actually is. As for yourself, I wouldn't at all be surprised to learn that you in fact don't even have a job and are merely talking shit to take up time in your virtually non-existent life.
Good luck MORON!

97

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:15 PM

Know what really grinds my gears? Certain people who run with their hands all scrunched up, pawing in front of them, like raptors.

Ivy League Cross Country Running Star

avatar
124 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:16 PM

111- I do have a BigLaw job- oh but here's the thing, it doesn't involve writing articles. Rather, it involves advising my clients on various issues, writing briefs, and attending court among other things- all of which I do quite well-hence my 2100 hours billed last year, my bonus, and oh the fact that I have RETAINED my job.

So you'll have to excuse me for trying to squeeze in a quick post reminding Elie of what his job actually is. As for yourself, I wouldn't at all be surprised to learn that you in fact don't even have a job and are merely talking shit to take up time in your virtually non-existent life.
Good luck MORON!

97

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:16 PM

111- I do have a BigLaw job- oh but here's the thing, it doesn't involve writing articles. Rather, it involves advising my clients on various issues, writing briefs, and attending court among other things- all of which I do quite well-hence my 2100 hours billed last year, my bonus, and oh the fact that I have RETAINED my job.

So you'll have to excuse me for trying to squeeze in a quick post reminding Elie of what his job actually is. As for yourself, I wouldn't at all be surprised to learn that you in fact don't even have a job and are merely talking shit to take up time in your virtually non-existent life.
Good luck MORON!

97

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:16 PM

"If you were already scheduled to work the full 12 weeks at Weil, the firm give you $1,500 in make good money. "

What the?

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:16 PM

LOL.

FIRST to say ATL just got duped.

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:17 PM

Shearman hasn't announced start dates yet, either, and from what I hear they are deciding how long to defer incoming associates and what kind of deferral stipend they will pay. Since it's certainly coming, thanks to Weil for setting the high mark. Hopefully Shearman will get close to it...

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:22 PM

Leverage can means either: 1) the firm operates on debt. 2) the firm has a high associate to partner ratio. You should clarify which one you mean.

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:22 PM

78 = RV. Your post is only one reason no one likes you.

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:27 PM

a firm start date DELAYED is justice DENIED

avatar
132 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:29 PM

109 - you are wrong, sorry (so smug you are) $90k to the people who work at public interest. I know you didn't do well in math, but this is pretty basic stuff.

avatar
133 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:30 PM

130, 78: I like IP and patent litigation also! You must be busy representing debtors and creditors! Good luck!

avatar
134 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:30 PM

97: I see. "Forgive" you for your error because it occurred in the context of making a "quick" post to criticize Elie for not proofreading his work, and because you don't write articles. Because we all know that proofreading skills are only required for people who write blog posts and news articles. Um, yeah...ok. I'm sure your clients would love to know that proofreading only applies to those who write articles.

Oh, and nice dodge of my main point i.e. that you're a pathetic moron because you believe, as do others here, that Elie's failure to proofread his articles reflects poorly on African-Americans in general and African-American lawyers and law students in particular.

YOU are the true embarrassment to African-Americans...

avatar
135 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:31 PM

My guess is that most 3Ls will turn down the deferral. Which provides better job security: to start working and building relationships or to keep standing outside the door looking in?

avatar
136 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:36 PM

Shearman has actually told us that our start date is November 30th, a few times, and initially set our advance at 7,500 and then doubled it to 15,000 when some people asked for more in light of the longer than normal delay. Of course, it's possible that will change, but it has been said. They really made it quite clear, if you're an incoming 09 3L I'm not sure how you missed that.

avatar
137 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:36 PM

75 -

You're right. I'm sure that moron's replacement of a commonly known compound word with its two separate roots was as purposeful as it was brilliant

I actually thought of the same thing as I was pulling into my drive way, ascending my stair well, and turning around shortly there after when I came across my room mate, thumb in ass, ATL on computer screen - he nearly cap sized the arm chair!

avatar
138 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:36 PM

127: Glad to know that I'm not the only one who thought this looked fake.

avatar
139 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:36 PM

I thought Elie was a white girl. who knew.

avatar
140 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:38 PM

Wrong about Weil being the first firm to push to 2011: Orrick already effectively deferred a ton of 3Ls to January 2011 by offering them deferred start dates at the very end of March 2010 and then strongly encouraging all of them to instead take a "fellowship" for 2010 and then start as early as January 2011.

avatar
141 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:40 PM

115, this applies across the board.

avatar
142 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:44 PM

What happens to a start date deferred? Does it dry up like a raisin in the sun?

avatar
143 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:45 PM

Wrong 136. Read your letter again. You cannot start "before" November 30. That does not mean you will start "on" that date. And Shearman has not yet determined when incoming associates will be able to start, I know that for certain. The partners are discussing deferral dates.

The 15k assumes a start date near November/ December. In light of the market for deferrals, are you going to be happy with a $15k ADVANCE (not stipend) if S&S tells you to start in late 2010?

avatar
144 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:46 PM

lol @ 137

avatar
145 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:51 PM

Weil is in real trouble. My friend hear this guy talking on the train about "doing bankruptcy work for Weil." That's right, I said it, Weil is GOING BANKRUPT

avatar
146 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:52 PM

They were never a real top ten firm anyways.

avatar
147 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:54 PM

127, 138,

ATL was not duped. Confirmed by Weil summers at my school (at least the summer program details).

avatar
148 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:54 PM

Can anyone else confirm this?

avatar
149 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:59 PM

145, Tremendous humor FAIL.

avatar
150 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:00 PM

Gibson news?

avatar
151 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:00 PM

146 --> completely agreed. They hired more sub-par (at least grades/journals/etc.) students from my school than any other V10. Unquestionably the easiest offer in V10 to get for this upcoming summer.

avatar
152 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:00 PM

Gibson news?

avatar
153 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:01 PM

147: what offices? I haven't heard anything (yet).

avatar
154 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:02 PM

110- lie...

avatar
155 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:02 PM

110- lie...

avatar
156 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:03 PM

Agree with 146 and 151. Some people at my T14 going to Weil had NO other offers from which to choose. Their hiring standards are rivaled only by Dunkin Donuts.

avatar
157 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:09 PM

143 - The initial letter at the end of the summer did indeed say no earlier than November 30th, but the follow on letter we got explaining the advance said there would be start dates on November 30th, December 7th, and December 14th and that everyone would be working by the middle of December. Again, it's at will employment, so it's of course subject to change, but it was really explained quite clearly. They may be discussing deferral dates, they may be discussing dissolving the firm, they may be discussing firing us all and hiring chimpanzees, who knows? I do know that whatever other failings they may have, and whatever may be in store for the firm in this economy, they have at least been up front with us up to now.

avatar
158 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:09 PM

What's a Weil Gotshal?

avatar
159 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:10 PM

I'm in Lit at a V5 firm and I might bill 300 hours this month. Any chance I'll be laid off?

avatar
160 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:10 PM

Are there firms out there that haven't announced START DATES yet???

avatar
161 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:14 PM

160 - Gibson and S&C haven't announced start dates

avatar
162 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:16 PM

161 - WTF is taking them so long?

-- terrified 3L w/offer

avatar
163 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:17 PM

145, you are a loser. You wished you worked for weil, but the fact is that you dont even know how to pay your rent. Weil is nowhere close to bankruptcy. Wait for GM restucturing and you will be surprised.

avatar
164 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:18 PM

145, you are a loser. You wished you worked for weil, but the fact is that you dont even know how to pay your rent. Weil is nowhere close to bankruptcy. Wait for GM restucturing and you will be surprised.

avatar
165 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:20 PM

163/164--
Are you daft? 145 was clearly making a bad joke.

avatar
166 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:20 PM

163/164

It was a joke. Just like you.

avatar
167 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:20 PM

Fuck law. Fuck lawyers.

avatar
168 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:21 PM

Wow, they're really asking their first years to wait aWEIL to start....

heyyooooooooooo

avatar
169 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:21 PM

162 - I wish I knew
--- 3L w/ offer

avatar
170 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:27 PM

Weil 2Ls will probably start in late 2014.

avatar
171 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:28 PM

Is Skadden the only safe firm left?

avatar
172 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:29 PM

The floodgates have now been open. I expect tomorrow will be a HUGE day in terms of firms announcing deferred start dates. And it won't be pretty.

Any firm that hasn't announced yet or stupidly set a start date in September or October will announce something before the end of the month. I always knew March would be a bloodbath for 3L's.

But the firms who wait too long need to know they are really fucking their incomings over.

avatar
173 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:30 PM

@168 is the #1 Punnnnner

avatar
174 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:34 PM

160: Baker Botts has not announced start dates.

avatar
175 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:38 PM

Milbank, Sidley, S&C, Proskauer, Shearman - and the list goes on. Why are these firms not announcing start dates?!?

avatar
176 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:39 PM

Um to all those morons who think Weil is in trouble - just want to let you know, Weil has ABSOLUTELY no debt. The firm never takes out loans, and everything is paid out of pocket. So, bankruptcy is impossible if you have NO CREDITORS.

avatar
177 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:40 PM

Thanks god we won't have to deal with this year's crop of spoiled, incompetent prima donna law students until January.

Weil Fifth Year Associate

avatar
178 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:41 PM

The economic health of any particular law firm can turn on a dime. Weil’s bankruptcy work was largely a mirage. According to the latest league tables, Weil only has 93 active cases, placing it 21st among law firms. It recently shed an amazing 130 cases.

Meanwhile, Latham (ATL’s punching bag du jour) is currently servicing 249 active bankruptcy cases thanks to a surge of new cases in Q4 2008. Latham is now 3rd among all law firms for active bankruptcy work.

No, I do not work at Latham. But if you think that any particular firm is “safe” because of what you read last week on ATL, you’re in for a rude awakening, kid. Today’s champion can turn into tomorrow’s chump in a nanosecond. Welcome to the law.

avatar
179 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:41 PM

151, really? When I was in law school (HLS '04), Skadden easily won the award for "V10 shop - most below-average hires." Given Skadden's size, I'm surprised that's changed.

avatar
180 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:42 PM

171 -- Skadden is trying to get everyone to defer --- not safe

avatar
181 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:43 PM

177, I'm guessing you somehow shot straight to being a 5th year, skipping your own "incompetent prima donna" years? Nice job.

avatar
182 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:44 PM

175 - Milbank gave us an October start date. But obviously nobody expects this to hold. In fact, many of us suspect that tomorrow will be the day we will all get the friendly phone call.

avatar
183 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:45 PM

"better researchers, writers, future rain makers,etc."

spoke like a real 2L that doesn't have a f__ing clue. I guess that's the natural progression law school - research - write - make rain.

Sounds about right.

Some of the best rainmakers were subpar law students and associates.

avatar
184 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:47 PM

178- Damn. I was basing my career plans on the bracketology here on ATL. Thanks for setting me straight.

avatar
185 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:52 PM

Interesting, of the sweet sixteen, Weil was the only one to have fewer equity partners between 2008 and 2009 (a 4.17% reduction). To put that in perspective, Dechert's partners are down 6.75% and Latham's are down 2.02%

avatar
186 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:56 PM

179,

Agreed. Weil might be easy, but Skadden is the neighborhood bike - everyone gets a ride!

avatar
187 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:59 PM

why are doing well and taking prudent business measures mutually exclusive? why are people so fucking dense?

avatar
188 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:00 PM

Traditionally the easiest V 10 offers to get were:

1) Skadden
2) Weil
3) Latham

Latham became more difficult this year because of their smaller class size.

avatar
189 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:01 PM

http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/03/the_deal_pipelines_bankruptcy.php

Top 3 bankruptcy for Q4 -- no Weil in sight.

avatar
190 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:08 PM

I'm glad DPW still has normal starting dates. Are they the only one?

avatar
191 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:08 PM

AHHHHHHHHH! I AM SO FUCKED!

avatar
192 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:11 PM

190 - you will not be starting in 2009. Trust me.

avatar
193 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:13 PM

192: Starting in Sept supposedly. Will wait and see.

avatar
194 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:18 PM

190 -- Debevoise also. They added a new start date a couple of weeks in the year, but they kept their usual start dates too in Sept. and October. I'm glad to have made this choice, hope work will be there.

avatar
195 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:19 PM

190 - don't kid yourself. Haven't you heard of the layoffs going on at your own firm?

avatar
196 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:25 PM

To those saying S & C has not fixed a start date, that is not correct. The firm in January set it at October 5 for all offices.

Whether or not it will remain that way, who knows?

avatar
197 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:27 PM

Did K & E officially fix a start date yet?

avatar
198 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:28 PM

firms that are still at 12 weeks should really confirm or deny the existence of a 12 week program. i need to sign a damn lease.

avatar
199 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:38 PM

Sidley announced start dates (and changed ones) like 3 weeks ago.

avatar
200 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:42 PM

Thank God I have a huge cock.

avatar
201 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:43 PM

Weil-hating has a long and glorious tradition. So here's a little fanboi-ism for you.
1. Weil was started and grew to fame based on the sweat of really smart jews who busted their ass. They were never handed the comfy country-club IB relationships of their white-shoe peers. Over years of hard work, they built their practice to the point where GECC, Lehman, Merrill (and inreasingly Goldman) became top clients of the firm. While they will always be looked down upon by the snooty elites, such as the wet-behind the ears juniors on boards such as this who talk about "prestige," they have built a consistent money-making powerhouse.
2. No, they are not Wachtell. Neither is anyone else.
3. Åt various times they have been derided as just a "bankruptcy shop." This is idiotic. While their bankruptcy practice has undoubtedly been the top one in the country, the firm carried its bankruptcy practice for the last few pre-crash years and continued to explode PPP's and revenues. This was mostly driven by PE and a top-notch (Am Law recognized) litigation practice.
4. To those who suggested, absurdly, that Weil's bankruptcy practice is somehow not keeping up, they are literally turning away work. And whoever posted that list of top firms doing bankrupcies in 4Q--come on. Greenberg? White & Case? What are the size of those bankruptcies? How many of them equal one Lehman? And by the way, when Weil's bankruptcy is hitting on all cylinders it contributes way more than "10%" to the bottom line. No matter how many bankruptcy partners there are, BK spits off enormous amounts of corporate and lit.
5. Of course Weil is not "in trouble". They posted increases in PPP last year. Wait til you see what happens in 09 when your Cravath's and Wachtell's are down 25-50% in PPP. All firms are in the shitter for the next few years. Until we can trade "prestige points" for money, your better off at Weil than anywhere else.

avatar
202 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:44 PM

200 - that cock sure does pay student loans.

avatar
203 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:46 PM

I dislike the way students working at Weil this summer at my school answer questions about where they're working.

"Where are you working this summer?"

"Oh (fake non-chalant look, sprinkled with smug sefl-satisfaction)...Weil..."

Now your firm is just as poo sucky as most of the rest of the V25 law firms. Suck it, you are not safe. I can already hear the "Well at least they aren't laying people off" retarded defense coming on.

avatar
204 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:52 PM

Milbank's making calls right now to incoming first years!!! will keep yall posted

avatar
205 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:54 PM

204 - you better not be bullshitting. What are they saying?

avatar
206 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:04 PM

203, hilarious. Nailed it on the head. Though that used to (and still does) apply to firms like S&C, Wachtell, Cravath, Davis, etc.

There is the opposite as well. The way those at Latham, Orrick, White & Case, etc. say where they are working (as if they had anything to do with layoffs or knowing ex ante they would happen there) and pretend like it's a badge of shame or something, even though those firms are still some of the hardest in the country to get an offer at (especially Latham). There's always the follow up "Well dude, I'm sure they're fine", which is never sincere either.

avatar
207 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:07 PM

Lets face it - Weil has some pretty darn good management. They are one step ahead of everybody else. Pretty creative to top the market - they are looking very smart in what they are trying to do. We should all be so lucky to work there!

avatar
208 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:13 PM

Dear 201, your beloved firm is telling first years not to show up to work until a year and a half after they had intended on starting. If I were an incoming first year, I would essentially consider myself unemployed under those circumstances. I'm sure Weil is a fine firm, but let's be real about its current situation.

avatar
209 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:19 PM

I think 207 is right. With Dannhauser, Wolf (heir apparent, i understand) and the new business/operations guy from investment banking (I think its Bear Stearns), my money is they will be top 5 when we emerge from the depression. They know exactly what they're doing.

However, i still think they regret the decision on Dennis Block. Pfizer's premiums are looking mighty pretty these days. Anyone from Weil care to comment?

avatar
210 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:21 PM

206 --- not hard to get a job at Latham ... the default firm for people at my law school

avatar
211 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:21 PM

204 is full of shit - no calls have been made.

212 Posted by Preston Wilcox III | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:23 PM

Although I shouldn't be, I'm amazed at how many douchebags are strutting around saying that Weil is in trouble because Weil is "leveraged" - a term they clearly picked up from an analytically-flawed law.com article. Do you TTTs know what leverage really is? The law.com link leaves out CRITICAL details in its "leverage" analysis, like how much debt does the firm carry for starters. So Firm A can have 5 associates per partner with massive debt and Firm B can have the same, but with no debt. Firm A, to any non-TTTer, is clearly more "leveraged" - and that's just a crude analysis. The law.com article doesn't look at other expenses, earnings/expense ratios, etc. Don't know where Weil is in that regard, but without knowing that, writing Weil off as "leveraged" is, well, TTT.

avatar
213 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:27 PM

207 - I second that. Weil is managed very well and has a lot of foresight. I think the the deferrals are in line with the low attrition rates and the current state of the economy, but the firm is very balanced and will come out of this in good shape

avatar
214 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:52 PM

211 - you just haven't gotten yours yet.

avatar
215 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:57 PM

210 - that used to be true. Latham was indeed a difficult offer to get this year.

avatar
216 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:02 PM

Fuck off 214. Nobody is making calls at 10pm.

avatar
217 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:08 PM

216 - some today, some tomorrow, etc.

avatar
218 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:10 PM

Anyone seen Nervous T10?

219 Posted by Kirk Lazarus | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:13 PM

Yo, assholes, this motherfucker's dead!

avatar
220 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:34 PM

Sidley has start dates: November 2009.

they also had old start dates- September 2009.

The leap to January 2010 seems like a reasonable one at this point. Question is whether theyll give anyone any friggin MONEY to pay for living expenses while we await our fate...

avatar
221 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:39 PM

Nobody will be starting in 2009! Anyone who believes otherwise is a fool. Cravath, Skadden, Cleary -- they will ALL push back eventually.

avatar
222 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:57 PM

Weil is not going anywhere, so is this blog. All Weil doing is making smart decisions. At least, it is not laying off people left and right. For most of you its just another name of the firm you don't know how to pronounce.

avatar
223 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:34 PM

Will Getch-you & Mangle-you

avatar
224 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:40 PM

OTOH,

Mar 26, 2009 - Cadwalader won Restructuring Law Firm of the Year , and a matter on which the firm acted as counsel for CIFG Holding Ltd. was presented with Deal of the Year , at the 2009 IFLR Americas Awards.

Mar 16, 2009 - Cadwalader is advising a group of senior secured creditors of Netherlands-based NXP Semiconductors in relation to NXP's pending exchange offer.

Feb 18, 2009 - Cadwalader is representing TradeComet.com LLC in an antitrust action alleging that Google, in an effort to thwart TradeComet.com’s subsidiary, SourceTool.com, blocked search traffic by instituting large price increases.

Feb 5, 2009 - The Department of Treasury has hired Cadwalader to advise the U.S. government on the restructuring of troubled U.S. automakers.

Jan 27, 2009 - Cadwalader represents former directors and officers of Pfizer, who were defendants in a derivative suit alleging that the company sold Celebrex and Bextra despite alleged cardiovascular risks associated with the drugs. On January 27, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss the action.

Jan 26, 2009 - Cadwalader is representing Pfizer in its acquisition of Wyeth in a $68 billion cash and stock transaction that creates one of the world's most diversified companies in the global health care industry.

Jan 22, 2009 - CIFG Holding, Ltd., the holding company for CIFG’s financial guaranty subsidiaries, along with its principal shareholders, Banque Populaire Group and Caisse d’Epargne Group, reached a final settlement with credit default swap counterparties and bondholders of ABS CDO exposures and certain CRE CDO exposures. Cadwalader acted as CIFG’s legal counsel.

Jan 20, 2009 - The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas confirmed the Plan of Reorganization for Heartland Automotive proposed by the debtors and Cadwalader's client, the Unsecured Creditors Committee. The Plan was confirmed in just over 12 months.

Jan 9, 2009 - Cadwalader Helps Lyondell Secure Record DIP Financing.

avatar
225 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:44 PM

Go Cadwalader! The underdog's on top.

avatar
226 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:47 PM

PSA:

The same fucking idiots who thought having 150 member summer classes (at firms with 400 total lawyers) was a nifty idea are the same fucking idiots who now can magically predict legal services demands for 2 years out...

That said, leverage is great when the associaTTTes are busy, but is a killer when they are not (obviously)

avatar
227 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 12:18 AM

177 - your comment reminded me of the time my mother called me a son of a bitch... looks like you insulted yourself with that comment... The one pathetic thing about the legal industry right from law school applicants to managing partners is the amount of pathetic insecurity that manifests through incessant and annoying comparisons of law schools, firms, practice areas, associate and partner levels, boats, houses, and of course the amount of square footage that their wives take up. Seriously, does anyone really think that they are better than other people because they work for the V6 firm as opposed to the V8 firm? Very few people at my school know that I am headed to biglaw and no one ever talks or brags about anything regarding job offers, lack of delays, or firm prestige ranking. In fact, most of us can't stand it when people ask.

avatar
228 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 12:34 AM

We'll see, 221.

BTW, I have already have a scheduled September start date from one of those firms you mentioned. Of course, things can change. But they haven't yet.

avatar
229 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:05 AM

No, K&E has not set start dates yet. At least not in SF.

Besides, I'm pretty sure if they rescinded offers, it would be up on ATL. Same with if they set start dates. And 119 probably would have heard they'd been fired? Just a guess.

avatar
230 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:20 AM

Any bad news from WLRK, CSM, S&C, and DPW? Skadden had already offered a deferral program two weeks ago. It looks that the legal industry has not hit the bottom yet. It generally lags behind the overall economy by about 4-6 months. If the economy hit the bottom in Mid-March, I expect the legal industry will hit the bottom this fall. Hopefully everything will start to look better by then.

I am still wondering what these firms going to do with all these deferred associates. Are they going to treat them as 2nd year or 1st year? For firms that haven't dramatically downsized their summer class, how are they going to accommodate the 2009 and 2010 class at the same time?

avatar
231 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:21 AM

Hogan is filled up with stealth layoffs to the tune of 10%.

avatar
232 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:29 AM

anyone who cites the Deal Pipeline as an indication of strength of bankruptcy practice is an idiot. Did you notice that K&E and Skadden, generally thought of as the other two heavy hitters in bankruptcy, are also not on the list?

One major debtor representation makes more money (and prestige, for those who care) for a firm than representing some bank as a creditor in 20 bankruptcies. Weil is going to make a killing on Lehman, WaMu, SemGroup, Pilgrim's Pride, etc....

and while there are literally 500 firms who are involved in the Lehman bankruptcy, only one (for the most part) represents Lehman.

avatar
233 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:32 AM

Fact: Weil is the GULC of the V10.

avatar
234 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:01 AM

Uh, Sullivan has a start date- October 5 2009. And i think Shearman also has ppl starting in Nov and Dec.

I am dying to know when Gibson/Willkie/MoFo/Milbank will announce, particularly Gibson bec I need to, you know, get an apt and stuff.

avatar
235 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 2:57 AM

228, that's what I thought about my clear cut sept date that i received some month ago. that was until last friday.

avatar
236 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:11 AM

228 - September start date you say? And........it's gone!

avatar
237 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 7:44 AM

What are the top 10 firms without layoffs or deferrments to date now? WLRK, S&C, Cravath, Davis, Kirkland, Simpson Thacher. Is that everything? Am I missing anything?

avatar
238 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 7:47 AM

No layoffs or deferrment at Skadden to date, too.

avatar
239 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 8:29 AM

Skadden has offered a voluntary deferral program. Of course if nobody signs on, they will have to do something.

http://abovethelaw.com/2009/03/skadden_deferral_option.php

avatar
240 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 9:06 AM

2011 incoming associate package = "don't come back lazy bastart"

avatar
241 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 10:03 AM

I'm excited for my $75k for doing nothing. This will be a very good year for me. The extra $15k for PI work doesn't interest me at all. My wife works, in a more stable sector of the economy (read she is an MD). I just don't know what I'm going to do with all of my free time. Any suggestions that don't involve public interest work? I'm looking more along the lines of wasting a year, and at the same time mocking everyone doing public interest work by making more than them for sitting on my ass. If someone could come up with something along those lines I would appreciate it.

avatar
242 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 10:04 AM

To 178, 189, and 224: obviously you don't know the difference between debtors' work and creditors' work. It's also obvious you don't know the difference between large debtor work (think Lehman, GM) and small debtor work (think Mom and Pop).

Weil gets the best bankruptcy work in the industry.

avatar
243 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 10:09 AM

241- Join a country club, play 36 a day and stay moderately intoxicated 14 hours a day.

avatar
244 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 10:22 AM

Skaddens start date is Oct 21- its not a deferral because they didnt couch it as one, but isnt that particularly late?

i start second week of sept.

avatar
245 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 10:38 AM

241 - maybe during that year you could enroll in "how not to be a douche" classes. i'm surprised weil would hire someone like you.

-V10 associate

avatar
246 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 10:50 AM

I find it funny the same people toting out the deal #'s right now to say Weil isn't tops in the business are the same people who scoff when Jones Day tries to use the deal #'s in M&A work to show how good they are. Quantity or quality people, take your pick.

avatar
247 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 11:02 AM

"I'm excited for my $75k for doing nothing. This will be a very good year for me. The extra $15k for PI work doesn't interest me at all. My wife works, in a more stable sector of the economy (read she is an MD). I just don't know what I'm going to do with all of my free time. Any suggestions that don't involve public interest work? I'm looking more along the lines of wasting a year, and at the same time mocking everyone doing public interest work by making more than them for sitting on my ass. If someone could come up with something along those lines I would appreciate it."

Wow, what a loser. Do you realize that people who want to do public interest work generally aren't in it for the money?

avatar
248 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 11:02 AM

To 246's comment,

While I'm sure this will be eviscerated by someone later, "quality" i.e. big time public bankruptcy cases as opposed to multiple smaller ones might not really be in the best interest for associates to one degree or another. On the bigger cases, you end up doing smaller more menial work for inordinate amounts of time and get less of the big picture. In a smaller engagement, you'll likely manage and work on more different parts of the case, possibly leading to better experience.

"But my resume says I worked on the Lehman bankruptcy!!!" - yeah, you put together lists of creditors and double checked them 10 hours a day for 10 months. Congrats.

avatar
249 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 11:13 AM

King and Spalding has pushed back start dates to 1/2010 - I also hear they are cutting partner salaries by up to 10%

avatar
250 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 11:15 AM

Answer to 101?

avatar
251 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 11:30 AM

Um, the economy did not bottom in March. It is going to contract for all of 2009.

Law bottom is, at minimum, summer of 2010.

avatar
252 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 12:00 PM

THIS STUFF IS CRAZY! MADNESS! HOW ARE INCOMING BIGLAW PEOPLE NOT JUMPING OUT OF WINDOWS?!?

avatar
253 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 12:07 PM

Where is mingo?

avatar
254 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 12:17 PM

So what the heck is someone supposed to do for 5 and a half months between the bar and the mid Jan start date?

avatar
255 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 12:19 PM

228: My September start date may go...but it hasn't gone yet.

I think everyone has to be pretty open-eyed about the challenges facing the industry. At the same time, just because your firm is doing things like pushing back start dates, shortening summers, etc., doesn't mean that mine will.

And incidentally, I would guess that Cleary is certainly not going to shorten summer programs for 2Ls, because that would completely interfere with their summer rotation program, which has already been set up (i.e., all the tickets and long-term accommodation has been purchased already).

avatar
256 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 12:25 PM

143, you are WRONG. Shearman sent an e-mail out a month after the letter saying that the first start date would be November 30, and the rest would be in December. Learn to read all the documents you are sent. It will really help you out as a lawyer.

avatar
257 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 12:38 PM

It's a cookbook! It's a cookbook!!!

avatar
258 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 12:49 PM

251, umm no. Have you seen the recent figures on the economy? Slow growth in Q4 and into Q1 of 2010.

avatar
259 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 1:06 PM

In accordance with the Las Vegas City Center possible filing, "The law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP is working for MGM Mirage on a range of legal issues." - WSJ.

biznes as usual.

avatar
260 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:12 PM

Is the $15,000 pre or post tax? Will Weil cover health insurance? If it doesn't -- and this money is taxed -- it doesn't look like such a generous stipend after all.

avatar
261 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 3:41 PM

260 - when your income for 2009 is $15,000, there is no tax.

avatar
262 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 5:52 PM

260 - whenever a dollar amount is specified in any transaction, it is pre-tax. There is no way for the payor to know the recipient's tax status and as such it would be impossible to allocate a payment that would yield 15,000 post-tax.

avatar
263 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 8:12 PM

241 - Obviously you [with your money-bags wife] do not have any student loans. Others are not so lucky.
I hope Weil dumps your ass. What a loser.

avatar
264 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 27, 2009 8:45 PM

241 is a complete idiot. How many people in the class of 2009 at Weil had wives that are doctors? I'm sure it would be VERY easy to out this guy, and I hope that someone at the firm does.

What a classless moron.

avatar
265 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, March 28, 2009 4:28 PM

There are no "safe" places to work. Many associates left Weil last year -- even more than the usual number of people left. The place is a revolving door of unhappy associates.

Weil downsized staffers in January.

avatar
266 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, March 28, 2009 4:29 PM

There are no "safe" places to work. Many associates left Weil last year -- even more than the usual number of people left. The place is a revolving door of unhappy associates.

Weil downsized staffers in January.

avatar
267 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, March 28, 2009 4:29 PM

There are no "safe" places to work. Many associates left Weil last year -- even more than the usual number of people left. The place is a revolving door of unhappy associates.

Weil downsized staffers in January.

avatar
268 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, March 30, 2009 12:45 AM

I'd take the $60K to not work for a year, move to Africa or Latin America, and live like a prince for a year!

avatar
269 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:27 PM

Deferred Associates-NJ Public Interest Organizations want you. Attend the NJ Deferred Associates Job Fair on 4/8 at the New Jersey Performing Arts Center to learn about 14 NJ public interest organizations with jobs openings for you. Newark Mayor Booker will speak as will White & Case partner Jack E. Pace III. To learn more about the Fair and to register, visit www.vljnj.org or search NJ Deferred Associates Job Fair on facebook.

Post Your Comment