Above the law march madness williams connolly victory.jpgThe final round of Above The Law’s 2009 March Madness for Law Firms was actually more exciting than the final round of the NCAA tournament.

While UNC routed Michigan State, Wachtell and Williams & Connolly were competing in a fierce battle for the title of Biglaw’s safest firm — the place where you are least likely to be laid off.

New York-based Wachtell (the #1 Vault seed) was leading early on in the day, but D.C.-based Williams & Connolly (V14) took the lead in the polls in the afternoon, and refused to let go.

When the buzzer sounded at midnight last night, WillConn claimed victory, 51.5 to 48.5.

According to ATL readers, Williams & Connolly is Biglaw’s Safest Firm, baby!!! *

*Out of the top 32 in the Vault prestige rankings

It’s a good time to be a small, streamlined firm in Washington, D.C., tight with the leading politicos. We congratulate the attorneys at Williams & Connolly on their job security prospects.

See the brackets and the explanations behind readers’ voting after the jump.


So why did ATL readers choose Williams & Connolly as a safer firm than Wachtell? Here’s what folks had to say in the comments. Some offer better reasoning than others.

W&C is clearly the safest in this economy. They don’t do transactional work at all and the flood of white collar prosecution will keep them super busy.


Truly prestigious firms don’t have summer associate Facebook groups. They wreak of insecurity and self-consciousness. Since WLRK has a group where everyone was made an admin and W&C tastefully has none the clear winner here is WillConn.


One big thing that shouldn’t be overlooked when thinking about which firm is “safest”: Wachtell is a firm that operates in the very cut-throat environment of M&A, and has huge partner profits to show for it. Do you really think partners there aren’t above cutting associates to maintain sky-high profits — just like the very clients whose deals they work on? They know business, and they know that businesses sometimes lay off people when they’re unnecessary. Kill or be killed.

Contrast this with W&C, which, while bare-knuckles in the courtroom, is known for being very non-business-like in its approach to management — making more partners than most firms and spreading the wealth more evenly among everyone (even if this lowers partner profits on average). It also operates in the let’s-be-sensitive-to-everybody DC market.

So while both firms are probably very safe for associates, I bet Wachtell would be quicker to lay off associates who aren’t necessary. They would view it as a necessary business decision to maintain profits, while a firm like W&C would take the profit hit in order to keep everyone on.


My vote goes to Williams & Connolly, for the very simple reason that W&C is probably now representing all the executives and companies that were involved in deals that Wachtell put together 5 years ago.

Plus, any firm that just got Ted Stevens off while making the DOJ look like idiots is going to be the go-to firm for anybody in trouble these days (and there are lots of them).


W&C’s winning is clearly the correct result. It’s not about PPP (remember Latham, anyone?) It’s about the culture. An ounce of experience is worth a pound of BS. I used to work at W&C. The rare associates who were asked to leave for performance reasons were regularly allowed to stay on the payroll for a year or more. The non-legal staff has obvious deadwood. It’s hard to say “never,” but W&C would not resort to associates layoffs until about 20 minutes before the U.S. reverted to a hunter-gatherer society.


I could go either way on this, but both firms are worthy finalists.

Moral of the story: “Small is beautiful.” If you’re tiny and super-selective, you don’t have to resort to layoffs.

In case you missed it, here is a look back on WillConn’s path to the top:

2009 March Madness final bracket.jpg

Earlier: ATL 2009 March Madness for Law Firms

Comments are hidden for your protection. Click here to show them.

View Comments

  1. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:08 AM

    not first

  2. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:09 AM

    waste of time and boring

  3. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:12 AM

    Cadwalader is obviously BigLaw’s safest firm. If you had allowed write-ins, it would have gone all the way.

  4. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:13 AM

    I think my secretary just ripped a Road Warrior. F’n disgusting.

  5. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:13 AM

    Next time you want to rig something, make it something interesting.

  6. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM

    yawn

  7. Posted by nervoustop101L | April 7, 2009 at 11:19 AM

    *immediately fills in williams & connolly as my #1 bid for this years oci…practices explaining my recently found love of litigation and all things d.c.*

    -nervous T-10 1L

    soon to be nervous 1L sa

  8. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:22 AM

    Hey, 7, who are you really? The original Nervous 1L stopped posting weeks ago.

  9. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:22 AM

    Idiotic topic and the conclusion is moronic.

  10. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:22 AM

    Idiotic topic and the conclusion is moronic.

  11. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:23 AM

    Latham won last years’ coolest law firm. Need I say more?

  12. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:23 AM

    Texas

  13. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:24 AM

    So what’s the over/under on how many days before Williams & Connolly announces layoffs?

    4 already won this post

  14. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:26 AM

    7 is a fake Nervous 1L. Beware his flame.

  15. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:26 AM

    “Be patient, my dog of war…”

  16. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:28 AM

    7: your debut has failed. Go quietly into the night.

  17. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM

    “NO!!”

    “WE KILL!!!”

    “WE GO IN!!!”

    “WE KILL!!!!”

  18. Posted by nervoustop101L | April 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM

    hey guys, no i’m the real nervous. remember i lost my password about a month ago? well this is my new username. i’m still the same nervous T-10 1L from michigan. who started posting back in october.

    *gives everyone a high five*

    -nervous T-10 1L

    soon to be nervous 1L sa

  19. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:32 AM

    What is the safest texas firm?

    -nervous 1L who wants to stay in texas

  20. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:33 AM

    W&C didn’t directly get Ted Stevens off and the DOJ made themselves look like idiots.

  21. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:35 AM

    Irell & Manella is at least as safe as W&C, if not safer

  22. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:36 AM

    W&C didn’t directly get Ted Stevens off and the DOJ made themselves look like idiots.

  23. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:36 AM

    HaynesCoone

  24. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:38 AM

    This poll is as stupid and useless as NTT1L

  25. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:39 AM

    W&C is getting me off right now.

  26. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:44 AM

    Well thank god we now know the opinion of a group of people who have never seen the balance sheets of these firms, have no idea what the current workload at these firms is, have no idea how these firms clients are responding to the times, etc., etc.

    Yay uninformed opinions.

  27. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:47 AM

    3 – half of these firms have laid off associates since the last round of cadwalader redundancies

  28. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:47 AM

    26 = associate at unsafe firm

  29. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:47 AM

    enjoy your madden curse w&c. remember the artist formerly known as latham?

  30. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:49 AM

    23: laid off Texan

  31. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:50 AM

    what is going on at dickstein shapiro, does anyone know?

  32. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:50 AM

    Hot cup of balls.

  33. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM

    I don’t care if its the real nervous 1L or not, he is a gigantic queef.

    4- Best post ever.

    PAUL WEISS WAS ROBBED!

  34. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM

    nervous…. go away. people know who you are… you were already outed once

  35. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM

    LOL @ 31

  36. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:56 AM

    Why didn’t Milbank win?

  37. Posted by nervoustop101L | April 7, 2009 at 11:57 AM

    34: was i really outed? i haven’t been reading the comments for the past month. nobody in my section knows who nervous T-10 1L is so i doubt i was outed.

    -nervous T-10 1L

    soon to be nervous 1L sa

  38. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:02 PM

    Nervoustop101L: You have got to be the douchiest law student on the planet. Who else consistently notes that they’re going to be a summer associate IN EVERY GODDAM POST. Stop rubbing it in everyone’s faces and maybe you wouldn’t be the 2nd most hated person on ATL (after Elie).

    –Not a 1L, not nervous

  39. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:03 PM

    35…what is funny about 31’s question

  40. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:05 PM

    V&E = safest Texas BigLaw firm

  41. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:05 PM

    V&E = safest Texas BigLaw firm

  42. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:08 PM

    I am so glad this stupid game is over…

    Please come up with some real material to post.

  43. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:08 PM

    Everything in Texas is safe.

    David Koresh

  44. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:14 PM

    Litigation is the best place to be right now, and the smaller the better.

    Some lit boutiques are still hiring, especially at the junior level:

    http://abovethelaw.com/2009/04/stone_magnanini_job_posting.php

  45. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:16 PM

    43 – Now that’s a dated reference. Are you by any chance the AIDS joke guy? If so, congratulations on successfully constructing a persona from the early-to-mid 90’s.

  46. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:20 PM

    Great. Not only are Williams attorneys not going to get fired, but they also won an award for it. Hopefully, some of them went to Carolina too.

  47. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM

    Shearman’s not paying a deferral stipend for those not taking the 1 year deferral.

  48. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:22 PM

    What do people hear about Cadwalader? Having thinned out its ranks, implemented an early start date and gotten involved in a few big deals over the past year, is it the dark horse candidate for next year’s “Safest Firm” poll?

  49. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:26 PM

    http://www.thomsonreuters.com/content/PDF/financial/league_tables/ma/2009/1Q09_legal_advisory.pdf

    If this is any indication… the M&A powerhouses are BACK. Cravath in the first 3 months of this year completed more deals than in ALL of 2008….

    Wachtell in the first 3 months of this year completed almost half of what it did in 2008 in the first 3 months of 2009. Bow down.

    No M&A isn’t back— but the M&A work that is around is going directly to the top places. Enough said

  50. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:31 PM

    @45 – From now on I will only make references about topics from the future; and no I am not the AIDS joke guy, but I wish I was. AIDS never gets old.

    Ryan White

  51. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:41 PM

    50 just made me spit out my chicken wrap. Game over. Everyone else, thanks for playing. And 50, when I finish laughing, I hope we can hang out in hell.

  52. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:53 PM

    40 — then why did v&e scale back their summer program?

    v&e was/is transaction heavy compared to bb.

  53. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 12:57 PM

    The stealth layoffs at W&C disagree

  54. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 1:27 PM

    52, I have no idea as to the health of V&E but scaled back summer programs are no indicator whatsoever. Layoffs, deferred start dates, salary cuts, etc… all reveal a suffering firm. A 10 as opposed to 12 week summer program means absolutely nothing. In this economy, it’s silly to spend on a longer summer program no matter how well your firm is doing.

  55. Posted by mlewis78 | April 7, 2009 at 1:51 PM

    Williams and WHO? The whole concept of safe firm is a joke. There is no job security anywhere.

  56. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 3:46 PM

    54 — well, according to nalp, v&e has over 140 summers this year, for a 700-lawyer firm. that doesn’t sound too safe to me. those numbers might work when there’s voluntary attrition, but if not, something has to give — eg, no-offers to summers, stealth layoffs, or a combination.

  57. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 9:09 PM

    This is why willconn won. This amlaw article is about Munger, but everything in it fully applies to willconn (except for the part about 2009 being tough)…

    http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2009/03/munger-revenue-and-profits-flat.html

  58. Posted by guest | April 7, 2009 at 11:23 PM

    21,

    Irell rescinded 3L offers (for those who did not summer with them the previous summer). Safe?

blog comments powered by Disqus