Add RSS RSS

Building a Better Legal Profession Students Still Dream of Power

BBLP new book.JPGWe have given a couple of shout-outs to the students behind Building a Better Legal Profession. The student run organization tries to empower law students to make more informed choices about law firms.

But even if we stipulate that the students are motivated by the best of intentions, is now the right time for prospective associates to focus on a better working environment? Aren’t most students simply trying to find paying work, environment be damned?

The National Law Journal reports on BBLP’s National Conference of Student Leaders (which coincided with the launch of their new guide to law firms):

The two-day event focused on changing what were often painted as the evil ways of big law firms and included presentations and discussion from well-known practitioners and professors.

The goal of Building a Better Legal Profession is to create collective action among students and associates from top schools to prod large law firms to implement what it says are significant changes needed in billable hour requirements, diversity and the commitment to pro bono work. Their hope is that students and associates from the best schools will not accept jobs at firms that do not change their ways.

Is it 2006 again? It shocks the conscience to think that students would “not accept jobs” at firms that are profitable and not laying people off, simply because the profitable, not-firing-people firm doesn’t care about pro bono work.

Is BBLP doggedly idealistic, or hopelessly out of touch? More questions after the jump.

Is it possible that even in this down market, top students still have collective power over law firms? One unnamed partner doesn’t think so:

But at least one law firm leader thinks that such collective action is a bad idea. As the chairman of a major U.S. law firm, he requested anonymity to speak candidly.

“Right now, the primary focus of law students and associates, like the firms for which they work or might like to work, should be the economy, and if and when the demand for legal services will rebound,” he said.

For those not fluent in partner-speak, the anonymous law firm chairman is saying “Ha ha ha. Student concerns? You kids are so f**ked.”

Even some law firm associates are dismissive of law students’ concerns. One tipster emailed us to say:

BBLP are students and have no idea what the firm environment is like right now. Here is the best advice: look for as many billable hours as you can get, work hard, keep your head down, your mouth shut and hope to avoid the Reaper. I certainly would not be marching in to the partner’s office to request “significant changes needed in billable hour requirements, diversity and the commitment to pro bono work.”

We have no leverage in this environment, and neither does BBLP. What planet are these students living on???

The BBLP people think that students and associates do have leverage, despite these tough times. Maybe even enough power to form a “union.”

Although the word “union” was used sparingly at the event, one session was led by a union organizer. Mary Kay Henry, the international executive vice president of the Service Employees International Union, gave tips on how BBLP leaders can get other students and associates involved in the movement. “Associates have the ability to act in their own behalf with others to improve their profession,” Henry said. “The increase in billable hours expected at large firms with fewer associates to do the work has created a pressurized environment that doesn’t allow associates to perform to their expectations.”

And the students are using every tool in the box to try to keep up the pressure on law firms. Check out the Google ad that comes up in the right-hand column when you run a search for a certain law firm:

BBLP blank rome google ad-thumb-540x217.jpg

The students behind BBLP are innovative and passionate. But can they be effective in this market? Blank Rome might get an F for “diversity,” but WolfBlock gets an F for “existing.” Where would you rather work?

Bad job market aside, law students seek change [National Law Journal]
Building a Better Legal Profession’s Guide to Law Firms: The Law Student’s Guide to Finding the Perfect Law Firm Job [Barnes & Noble]
Building a Better Legal Profession’s Guide to Law Firms: The Law Student’s Guide to Finding the Perfect Law Firm Job [Borders]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:01 PM

First....and lame.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:04 PM

Even in this economy I would refuse to work at Paul "Coat Hanger" Hastings.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:04 PM

I just found out I'm going to be stuck doing doc review in Witt Springs, Kentucky for the rest of this week. Can anyone recommend a good, reasonably clean public toilet? Just in case - I like to be prepared.

Thanks in advance.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:06 PM

What, are we building it our of LEAVES?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:07 PM

I wish these students the best of luck. They have their work cut out for them.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:07 PM

Last sentence - so true!

4 = fail.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:10 PM

When I Google "Blank Rome," I don't see the ad that says "See why Blank Rome is the only firm with an F for diversity in New York."

What gives? Did Blank Rome get the ad killed?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:11 PM

I just googled Blank Rome and that box did not come up. Good photoshopping, MysTTTal.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:12 PM

Considering that Biglaw firms walk a fine line between efficient collective action and violating antitrust laws, partners cannot object to students aggregating their power on the opposite side without coming across as hypocritical and greedy. Its only fair.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:12 PM

Mckenna cut first year salaries by 20k. How are you not on this?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:13 PM

What, are we building a better legal profession out of LEAVES?

What, are we building a better legal profession out of LEAVES?

What, are we building a better legal profession out of LEAVES?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:13 PM

7/8,

WTF? You don't block google ads? Try getting Firefox, downloading some extensions, and joining the rest of us.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:14 PM

10: cont'd - (Aside from the fact they're not relevant) how are you not on the salary cuts? It's in WSJ.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:17 PM

Building a Better Legal Profession? More like rich white kids on crack. Biiiitch, please.

Angie Tempura.

15 Posted by The Dow is Down Guy | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:17 PM

These students need to get their heads out of their casebooks and pick up a copy of the Wall Street Journal. I would like a hit of whatever they are smoking.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:19 PM

Yes, the WSJ quotes ATL:

"What a difference a week makes. Yesterday, Above the Law reported that Greenberg Traurig will cut associate salaries in the neighborhood of 10 percent, joining the ranks of McGuire Woods and Allen Matkins."

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:20 PM

Law students of today are better off rolling the leaves up into a joint and taking puffs off the magic dragon because their dreams of a big payday at biglaw are blown up in smoke. Suck on it.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:21 PM

These people have always been idiots.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:22 PM

Google "Law Firm Blank Rome" and it comes up...

"The students behind BBLP are innovative and passionate. But can they be effective in this market? Blank Rome might get an F for "diversity," but WolfBlock gets an F for "existing.""

Ellie get's an "F" for blogging (and yet I still read them).

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:22 PM

Elie's conscience is apparently easily shocked.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:23 PM

great idea. wait for the next boom. today and for the next few years they are kidding themselves about making progress.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:23 PM

There's plenty of obvious critiques of BBLP out there, but I think the most obvious one is that they don't understand how labor markets work. The organization is led by idealistic law students who have always sought the best of the best, went to Ivy League undergrads and a top law school, and have their sights set on working at the most "prestigious" firms--then they react with horror when they find out that life as an associate at the most prestigious firms is rough, hours are long, and management doesn't ask first "what can we do for you?" In life there are tradeoffs - setting aside the dire economic conditions, their general mission amounts to wanting to have their cake and eat it too. Want fewer hours and a more humane system of management? Go to a lower-paying firm that requires fewer billable hours, don't cry that your favorite V-10 firm expects to treat you like adults.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:24 PM

The issue is not about the collective effort designed to promote a better working environment. On its own, this is a perfectly normal and justified goal that we should all try to achieve. However, it is pathetic that law students think that they are the right people to lead this. Firms do NOT care about you these days. If they could just travel in time and just ignore 2009-2001 classes, they'd do it in a heart beat. Now, stop behaving like a bunch of lousy, lazy and narcissistic babies and try focusing on becoming better lawyers for now. You don't even know how firms operate, douchebags.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:24 PM

they can't stop just because the economy is bad. instead, they are doing the smart thing - ruffling feathers and taking notes about which firms are actually serious about any of this. Unfortunately that may be none of them...oh well...wait til the Dow gets back to 15k.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:25 PM

These losers are socialists. Determined to destroy all of us just like their president.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:27 PM

If you want to nice, pure job, don't work for a large law firm. Oh, what's that? You will want a really high salary and a fancy office? Yeah, can't help you there.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:27 PM

I think some commenter said it best on an earlier post about BBLP - all the jobs these T14 kids plan to turn down are just gonna be butter for the TTT grads down the list that the firms are gonna turn to next.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:32 PM

Why would I ever want to join a union w/ these douchebags. I'd rather excel on my own then be dragged down by these whiny brats who have probably never worked a day in their lives. Biglaw is a business, if you want to be in a profession hang up your own shingle.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:33 PM

27 - LOL....

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:35 PM

Dear BBLP folks,
Thank you very much. I was having a rough time deciding between Wachtell (#76 in NY on you list) and Dewey (#2 in NY). Thanks to your painstaking research, I now know that Dewey is the clear best choice.
Sincerely,
A grateful reader

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:37 PM

I hope that more dumb law students start ascribing to the BBLP ideology. It will leave more jobs for me when they get fired for bitching about diversity or pro bono hours. I would literally stab my best friend in the stomach for a good, secure job right now. If someone does give me a job I'm going to thank them for not making me actually battle my best friend to the death during lunch. And then I am going to work my ass off so I don't get fired.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:43 PM

Tilting at windmills...

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:44 PM

It's a Buyer's market out there. Sellers (of legal services) beware. And that's the fact, Jack.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:44 PM

31 -- you're a sociopath. killself.

-- Your best friend

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:45 PM

Suck on my Howrey Prestige, bitches!

You are all idiots.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:46 PM

"but wolfblock gets an F for 'existing.' "

I'll give credit where it's due. Elie, that was some funny shit.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:46 PM

WolfBlock gets an F for "existing."


Nice

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:50 PM

Hey 36, say hi to your mother for me.

31

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:58 PM

I'm with 22, these kids are unrealistic whiners. If you want a humane working envrionment find a small firm or government org that fits your lifestyle what you want out of a career.

Big firms are not for everyone but most students at top students take a few years to understand this basic truth.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:59 PM

30- clearly you want Dewey. Who wants to actually be good at what they do and get paid for the work they do? I mean, do you hate America or something? Clearly the American dream is to do nothing and get paid for it! Go BBLP!!!

Former Creighton 1L

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:01 PM

19 - You get an F for grammar.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:02 PM

Pro bono hours are actually up at a lot of firms during this recession because billable work is down. As far as diversity goes, people need to get a clue. That's all these firms care about. It's not for lack of trying that they don't have a diverse class. Qualfied 'diverse' applicants that apply get hired in today's world. There's just not always enough of them applying. So sorry we get an F in a category because qualified hispanic females with three toes didn't apply to our firm in high enough numbers.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:03 PM

AA for poor whites please. We also attend shit schools.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:05 PM

What a joke. How about you kiddies get over your self-indulgent selves and actually try working first? Holding a national conference on this shit -- really? In this economy? Out of touch whiners.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:05 PM

What a joke. How about you kiddies get over your self-indulgent selves and actually try working first? Holding a national conference on this shit -- really? In this economy? Out of touch whiners.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:05 PM

41 - You get an F for acting as the grammar police.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:05 PM

If these kids want diversity and public interest work there are plenty of jobs that will offer them that. Of course what they want is a big fat paycheck. Since that is their first priority they have zero sympathy from me. Make a choice: either go for the big bucks and STFU, or go work for Legal-Aid or something. They seem to ignore the basic fact that what they want is right there in front of them, it just doesn't pay 160K a year. For that reason they are essentially a bunch of crybabies.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:07 PM

NAMBLA clerkships are the best way for poor whites to attend better schools.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:10 PM

Munger > Blank Rome

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:11 PM

What the people behind Building a Better Legal Profession are doing is much needed. Right now BigLaw is downright unhealthy in many ways. Bravo for them, and they cannot and should not stop agitating for the issue just because times are tough.

39, I find that when someone uses the term "whiner" it is shorthand for saying "you have raised an important and legitimate issue that I do not wish to consider." Try arguing about facts instead of ad hominems.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:12 PM

This is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen. BBLP is hoping that firms will fundamentally change their business models to reflect BBLP principles rather than losing the occasional 2L BBLP true believer to another firm. Even in a better legal market than this, there will always be a steady stream of the best and brightest willing to sign up for life in Biglaw's gilded cage.

52 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:13 PM

Sheeeeet!

I played in the league and made me some money. Then I did some white and Stern was like, "you can't play no more."

I needs me some crafty college age wanna-be Jew lawyers to dream up a way to get me back in the league!

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:14 PM

The legal profession would be a much happier place if firms put viagra in all the food at the cafeterias.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:14 PM

I wonder if firms are taking notes on which students are actually spearheading this inane movement and blackballing them. In the end, these douchebags might not have offers to reject! Good on ya!

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:16 PM

This post is stupid. Sure, the firms with a bad environmental/diversity/whatever rep are still going to be able to fill their jobs ITE, but they may not get the most selective students. If HYS students decide to not work at Blank Rome, for instance, they'll have to either fill up with TTT students or change their ways. This is simple economics - TTTs are inferior goods.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:17 PM

50:

FACT: If you want a humane working environment find a small firm or government org that fits your lifestyle and what you want out of a career.
FACT: Big firms are not for everyone but most students at top students take a few years to understand this basic truth.
FACT: If someone wants to work for a great government org that will give you fine experience in very racially diverse atmosphere, you can find them as I know several. Sorry but they all pay ~50k to start so you might have to test the limits of your idealism.

-39

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:19 PM

I'm with 36/37

He deserves a lot of the flack he gets around here. But every once in a while, Elie nails it.

And who are these kids kidding? BBLP? Big Beautiful Legal Professionals didn't have that acronym on lockdown?

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:20 PM

How self indulgent... they want students to refuse to work at big firms, as if their superior legal skills will be missed. Get a clue, Harvard does not make you a genius or particularly good at practicing law. There are thousands of attorneys with experience that are significantly more valuable than you. You are picked simply because you are relatively cheap and have yet to grow a spine, aka you will work long hours and be the punching bag to some partner who just realized he used to be the bitch that you now are.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:20 PM

How do you know if you are TTT?

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:21 PM

Wow. Great article by MysTTTal. I'm shocked. No typos. No idiotic jokes. Its almost like someone wrote it for him, and then he took credit for it.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:21 PM

How self indulgent... they want students to refuse to work at big firms, as if their superior legal skills will be missed. Get a clue, Harvard does not make you a genius or particularly good at practicing law. There are thousands of attorneys with experience that are significantly more valuable than you. You are picked simply because you are relatively cheap and have yet to grow a spine, aka you will work long hours and be the punching bag to some partner who just realized he used to be the bitch that you now are.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:24 PM

that's a FIG LEAF of probono/diversity, noone is fooled

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:24 PM

54 agree. How do you think hiring partners at firms like Skadden and Weil will react when they see "BBLP" on your resume? Career suicide.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:24 PM

If I am a Locke Lord Austin senior associate, and have a normal sized wife and a really nice townhouse, can I be considered prestigious?

SMU grad

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:26 PM

I doubt any CLS students are a part of this organization. BigLaw will always have its pick of cogs - BBLP or no BBLP.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:28 PM

51 got it. BBLP hopes that enough people will band together around the same ideals and make career decisions based on these principles, and eventually have an economic impact on the industry. These kids are so self-important, they don't realize that they're easily replaceable with real adults out there who are willing to sacrifice and work for their pay.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:30 PM

@64 - Close one, I think your choice of automobile will be the tie-breaker.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:35 PM

http://www.betterlegalprofession.org/leadership.php

I suppose when you have these credentials you think you can spearhead something like this.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:47 PM

@67 - I drive a silver Escalade.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 2:02 PM

55 - hit the nail on the head

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 2:07 PM

what about a piece on the interesting eminent domain issues over in Maryland regarding the Preakness?

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 2:28 PM

55, explain how someone who bases their employment decision on who will make them work less is in any way a "selective candidate" or someone who will ever be able to hack it in a big law firm.

I'd rather take someone who is willing to work their ass off for me, than someone who still wants a huge paycheck but wants to work less for it.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 2:30 PM

71, what do you think this is, WSJ LB?
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/04/09/marylands-run-for-the-preakness-would-it-be-constitutional/

ATL probably won't do a whole post on this, unless it involves horse steroids, ie, http://lawlibrary.rutgers.edu/courts/appellate/a0299-08.opn.html or some jockey's 3500 sq. ft. wife & Lexus...

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 2:57 PM

55, explain how someone who bases their employment decision on who will make them work less is in any way a "selective candidate" or someone who will ever be able to hack it in a big law firm.

I'd rather take someone who is willing to work their ass off for me, than someone who still wants a huge paycheck but wants to work less for it.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 3:05 PM

55 must be a member of BBLP if he thinks the firms are going to miss these "most selective" of students - Biglaw firms will always be able to fill up a class of first years without venturing outside the top 5-6 law schools - LOL if you think a hiring partner at Skadden or Cravath is going to sweat " of the 800 2L's combined at HYS, no one wants to work for us" - then LOL at you

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:04 PM

75 is right, to quote Billy from the film, "Predator":

"There's something out there waiting for us, and it ain't no man. We're all gonna die. "

That something is this economy, what's waiting is a slew of pink slips....we're all going to be laid off.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:07 PM

@69 - You deserve your shitty mileage.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:09 PM

Someone should tell these children that old yarn about how the graveyards are full of indispensible men.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:41 PM

We're out of touch? What you "salt-of-the-earth", "I slave and sacrifice for every dollar", "if you can't stand the heat..." types fail to realize is that while you may (incompetently) run law firms and may, therefore, have something (of no value) to say about the work force, we (i.e., graduates of places like Stanford, Harvard, and Yale law schools) are the ones who run the country. So, I suggest you pay close attention to these little rumblings from an elite school out west, because, one day, these kids are going to graduate and proceed to destroy the established system of business law.

PS, to commenter 28, who says that Biglaw is a business, not a profession: I remind you that law is, and has always been, a profession (note the specialized training, self-regulation, and stringent ethics rules). Adding the prefix "Big-" to it does not suddenly transform it into a purely business enterprise. In short, you're a "Small-[minded]" f*****g moron. Enjoy your depression, alcoholism, and (merciful) suicide!

- More important HYS grad who tells people like you what to do.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:54 PM

79, my fellow BBLP adherent, see you at the next Skull and Bones meeting? We rule!!!

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 8:34 PM

The main thing BBLP does is provide more information, so that law students can make better informed choices. Some of you may want to bill 2200+ hours per year, and some of you may not. BBLP will help students sort themselves into places where they are more likely to fit.

And some of the students who actually care about things like hours and quality of life may be top-ranked students at top law schools. Perhaps a big firm will make a niche for itself by providing a place where excellent lawyers can practice while also having a semi-normal life on the side. Or perhaps not- let's get the information out there and let the market decide.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 9:18 PM

Senior Associate at V5 here-- These delusional dauphins are going to have a choice when they hit the real world: (a) drop their bullshit and earn their pay, or (b) be fired.

You wanted to start at 165k, so you had better earn it. That means billing. If you aren't cool with working to earn your money, move to France. If I find out some 2L douche is a BBLP member in an interview, I am going to ding the lazy fuck.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 9:32 PM

81- info has been out there for a while. The geniuses at BBLP just sorted it.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:14 PM

82--Do you happen to have a book I can about law firms? Your infinite wisdom made me wet and I want more, so much more.
In the case you don't have a book I guess I'll have to purchase BBLP's book or get the skinny from you over the phone. Your digits?

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:43 PM

wait a minute... back up... there's a law school at creighton?

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:28 PM

I'd like to thank BBLP for guaranteeing that my billable hours and salary will keep skyrocketing upward. I can do a first-year's work standing on my head with my eyes closed. They have absolutely no idea how things work in the real world.

Signed,
A Senior Paralegal (who helps and doesn't hate lawyers)

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:46 PM

Senior Paralegal (#86) here again.

I love you, #82.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:30 PM

Good for BBLP! If associates had the balls to unionize, they would be in far better position right now. Top students have power to make such changes - while TTT firms may not care what kind of people they hire, the handful of elite firms out there do care - and they will move in the direction the top talent wants them to move in.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 12:00 AM

I am all for changing the working environment in big law firms. Billing 2400 hours a year is not healthy from either a personal or career development perspective. You need time to step back and digest the work you are doing.

That said, I can't stand these self-righteous brats.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, April 18, 2009 10:29 AM

I assume all BPLPs are rejecting any offers that would pay then more than $50,000 per year.

Post Your Comment