Cost Cutting At Schiff Hardin
Ronald S. Safer, managing partner of Schiff Hardin, emailed associates last week about all of the cost cutting measures the firm was undertaking to preserve associate jobs.
The memo starts with the words every associate is looking for:
I know you have read with interest, and undoubtedly some trepidation, the news of law firms slashing personnel, lawyers and staff alike. We have no intention of following that lead. We do not part with our most valuable assets - our people - lightly.
You’d think that with that kind of opening most Schiff associates would have to change their pants before they could continue reading the memo.
Sadly, the tone of the memo changes pretty quickly:
Nor are we immune from the economic downturn. Our clients are affected by the credit crunch and decreased activity in almost all sectors of the economy, and our success is aligned with theirs. Nonetheless, our business model is sound. Unlike some of our competitors, our practices are diverse. We have grown within our means. We have no long-term debt. We have focused our efforts on strategic planning to grow our business. We are well-positioned to weather this storm and thrive as we have for over 140 years.
Whenever a firm announces the absence of “long-term debt,” you can be sure that bad things are about to happen for its employees. It’s like an owner giving his manager a “vote of confidence.”
After the jump, we get into just what Schiff is cutting.
As we’ve seen time and time again, the staff are the first people to be gently nudged out of the door:
[W]e are offering a Voluntary Early Retirement Option (VERO). All staff who will be sixty years of age as of 6/30/2009 will be eligible to participate in early retirement.
Haven’t we proven that voluntary departure programs don’t work?
Law students (both incoming first years and incoming summer associates) are also getting nailed:
We will make changes involving some personnel who have not yet joined the firm. We will curtail our summer associate program by shortening it to 8 weeks and making the program more content focused. We will delay the start date for our Fall Associates to January 1, 2010. As always, we will critically assess the performances of everyone at the firm - partners, associates and staff - as part of our commitment to professional excellence.
Meanwhile, while Schiff might value its attorneys, it doesn’t necessarily need them to be healthy:
We have adjusted our ALAS coverage and will defer our involvement in the History Makers Program for this year. Associates, like Partners and Of Counsel Attorneys, will be responsible for 100% of the premium for health and disability insurance.
A tipster breaks down the extra costs like this:
All associates must now pay for their long-term disability: $24/month
All associates have the choice of short-term disability coverage: $60/month
Both of these were previously provided by the firm. So, that’s about $1000 per year….The firm provided subsidies at the following rates:
singles: approx $2500/yr
single + spouse: apprx $5000/yr
Family: approx $7500/yrIn essence, the firm has cut the pay of associates, by passing these costs on to them effective May 1st, by anywhere from $3500 - $8500 depending on who was getting insurance through the firm.
Obama is going to fix that, right?
But Mr. Safer assured associates and staff that they were not alone:
[T]he owners of the firm - the partners - believe they should share the cost of the economic downturn. They believe we should not sacrifice those who have the most to lose in this environment and who have loyally served the firm for years, to boost their profits. That stands in stark contrast to many of our competitors. It is, in my view, one of the critical factors that makes our firm a different and wonderful place to work.
Partner Emeritus is not going to be happy about that.
Every single one of these cost cutting moves would probably be supported by associates, if the no layoff promise holds up. But has Schiff already made cuts? There are all sorts of stealth layoff rumors swirling around the firm, but we haven’t been able to confirm any of them.
Schiff Hardin did not respond to our immediate request for comment for this story.
We fully support maneuvers that help people hang onto their jobs in this tough market. Read the full memo below.
SCHIFF HARDIN — MEMO — COST CONTROL MEASURES
I know you have read with interest, and undoubtedly some trepidation, the news of law
firms slashing personnel, lawyers and staff alike. We have no intention of following that lead. We do not part with our most valuable assets - our people - lightly.
Nor are we immune from the economic downturn. Our clients are affected by the credit
crunch and decreased activity in almost all sectors of the economy, and our success is aligned with theirs. Nonetheless, our business model is sound. Unlike some of our competitors, our practices are diverse. We have grown within our means. We have no long-term debt. We have focused our efforts on strategic planning to grow our business. We are well-positioned to weather this storm and thrive as we have for over 140 years.
Part of the equation that makes us successful is conservative management and cost control. Efforts in these areas are very important in these challenging times. We will not sacrifice client
service or our culture of respect for the contributions that everyone in this firm makes to that service.
We must cut costs while honoring these core values. We will do so with the transparency that
characterizes our management of the firm. We will make changes involving some personnel who have not yet joined the firm. We will curtail our summer associate program by shortening it to 8 weeks and making the program more content focused. We will delay the start date for our Fall Associates to January 1, 2010. As always, we will critically assess the performances of everyone at the firm - partners, associates and staff - as part of our commitment to professional excellence.
As suggested by our staff, we will eliminate this year’s Staff Appreciation Luncheon and Picnic. We will not have Holiday Parties this year. Similarly, the Attorney Dinner Dance will not be
held this year. The Equity Partners’ Retreat will be replaced by a business meeting which will be held in Chicago. We will, however, hold our Service Recognition Luncheon for staff again this year. Although an admitted “luxury,” this event honors and recognizes the loyalty and dedication of those who have given so much to this Firm for so many years. That event, and the attributes it honors are invaluable in our view.
We have adjusted our ALAS coverage and will defer our involvement in the History
Makers Program for this year. Associates, like Partners and Of Counsel Attorneys, will be responsible for 100% of the premium for health and disability insurance. We will continue to share this cost with members of our staff. There will be an associates meeting on April 1st in room 7203/05, with video from other offices, at noon cdt for all who wish to discuss these measures or any other issues.
Finally, we are offering a Voluntary Early Retirement Option (VERO). All staff who
will be sixty years of age as of 6/30/2009 will be eligible to participate in early retirement. We will have an informational meeting on April 1st in room 7203/05, with video from other offices, at 11:00 AM cdt for all staff who meet the age requirement. Full details of the plan will be given at this meeting.
These are the significant changes to our cost structure we have made in response to the
current economic environment. In addition, we will continue to try to become more efficient in the
utilization of our resources across all our offices. In an ideal world, we would take none of these steps, but we must deal with the world as it is.
I know that you will note that these changes are minor relative to the drastic measures taken by many other major law firms. There are two reasons for that. First, as noted above, we are
economically sound and well-balanced. We do not believe drastic measures are necessary at this time.
Second, the owners of the firm - the partners - believe they should share the cost of the
economic downturn. They believe we should not sacrifice those who have the most to lose in this
environment and who have loyally served the firm for years, to boost their profits. That stands in stark contrast to many of our competitors. It is, in my view, one of the critical factors that makes our firm a different and wonderful place to work.
We are proud of the performance of our firm in the current economic environment. We remain confident in our continued success. We are hopeful that the adjustments I have described will
accomplish our goal of responsibly controlling costs, but we will continue to monitor our performance closely as the year unfolds. The most constructive steps that all of us can take from this point forward are to continue to do our jobs with the commitment, skill, efficiency and client focus that have always characterized our work.
Thank you for your consideration and understanding.
Ronald S. Safer
Managing Partner




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
first by my own petard!
"We have no long-term debt."
This is starting to sound like Kevin Bacon shouting "all is well!" at the end of animal house. Isn't it really the case that no law firm carries "long-term debt," since profits are distributed on a yearly basis? If a firm still has debt outstanding at the end of the year, then it doesn't have any profits to distribute, and, if that's the case, the firm has probably already dissolved, right?
I took a pill and have been Schiff and Hardin for 6 hours now. Should I see a doctor?
Um, no real discussion of the line "[a]s always, we will critically assess the performances of everyone at the firm - partners, associates and staff - as part of our commitment to professional excellence." Sounds like stealth "performance based" layoffs are coming to me.
So if this actually happens, new associates will have to show up for work on New Year's Day? Nice
I am amazed at the continued tone of this blog, which gasps every time a law firm confirms a cost reduction or layoff. It is HILARIOUSLY IRONIC that these law firms are the ones who are DEFENDING the lawsuits brought by former employees for the same exact things done in other corporations. It is so interesting that law firms are willing to go to bat for big corporations and their AT WILL employment schemes, but who at the same time bitch that they are subject to those same conditions.
Only when their own selfish hides are on the line are corporate lawyers willing to bitch and moan about the instability of at-will employment schemes, the concentration of capital in the hands of a few that extracts their labor, etc. Spending your whole life defending the rights of management to make Biz Judgment decisions, then bitching about layoffs is ABSURD. If you don't like the free-market system, partnership control over employment, go to EUROPE where there are rules, unions, etc about when you can hire and fire people. These are the same rules and institutions that law firms routinely harass, and litigate against.
Jesus lawyers are the most ridiculous, class obsessed, greedy and risk averse pussies I have evar encountered.
Where did Ronald Safer go to law school?
Funny -- he went to GULC. And for undergrad he went to Penn State's Warton school:
http://www.schiffhardin.com/RonaldSSafer.htm
Given that this kind of memo almost always precedes a round of layoffs, and after all of the layoffs they have already had, who is going to be left?
6 - well be glad that YOU aren't a lawyer. Idiot.
This post is timely for me. I'm a SchiffHardin first year in New York stuck in a conference room with a bunch of documents. The vending machine outside is out of coke. Does anyone know of another one on the 23rd floor, or elsewhere in the building? I could really use a coke.
--Thirsty on Third Ave.
#9, you are an asshole.
Why waste words? Just say we are cutting back like every other law firm.
Elie, are you criticizing the action taken by this firm? This seems like the the most responsible and spread out response by any firm yet. Every person at the firm is sharing the burden.
Anyone out there who thinks they're on the chopping block would absolutely love to take a minor paycut to keep their job.
6 - well be glad that YOU aren't a lawyer. Idiot.
EXPLAIN
I suppose people over sixty will be rushing to take a buyout after watching they retirement savings crumble over the past year, knowing full well they have no chance of landing another job in this economy.
#15, you are an asshole.
http://nymag.com/news/features/55863/
You should blog this.
Hopefully Schiff will acknowledge the next round of layoffs as economic and not continue pretending that its layoffs are performance related.
5 - yeah, so what if they do?
#20, stop being such an asshole.
http://www.lw.com/practices.aspx?page=practicedetail&practice=123
http://www.skadden.com/recruiting/recruitingContent.cfm?p=190
http://www.skadden.com/recruiting/recruitingContent.cfm?p=88
The law firms detailed in this blog are enablers of mass layoffs ALL THE TIME. What do you think M&As are about? What do you think golden parachutes are about? Preserving wealth for the owners while employees get fired.
It's becoming increasing clear that, come this Fall, firms are going to have to make a decision: layoff another round of associates to make room for the incoming ones or revoke offers to incoming associates en masse. Firms are praying they don't have to make this decision, but its coming.
17 - That's the best response your fertile mind can formulate?
Schiff's approach is healthy. They spread the pain across the firm to avoid layoffs, keeping moral high and (hopefully) attracting clients in the upturn because of adequate staffing.
#20, stop being such an asshole.
EXPLAIN How pointing out hypocritical bitching is being an asshole?
6 - Best. Comment. Evar.
Learn to spell, moron. Also, you forgot 'richest' and 'most prestigious professionals' in your a55-monkey list.
Schiff's approach is healthy. They spread the pain across the firm to avoid layoffs, keeping moral high and (hopefully) attracting clients in the upturn because of adequate staffing.
#20, stop being such an asshole.
EXPLAIN How pointing out hypocritical bitching is being an asshole?
6 - WTF is a 'Jesus Lawyer'?
#31 is an asshole.
#27, please stop being such an asshole.
30 - a lawyer who lost a capital punishment case approx. 2009 years ago.
6- You rock.
Face it, lawyers are whores.
Have no fear. President Hussein will save us all.
21 - So in your world, posing a question asking someone to defend their thought makes someone an asshole?
Interesting, albeit obtuse, reasoning you have. Not to mention that your use of profanity underscores your inability to put together a more compelling line of reasoning.
36 - OBJECTION: Excessive use of the word 'reasoning' in a 2 sentence paragraph to give the perception of intelligence to a meaningless comment.
Sustained.
34 - Rich whores.
#36 - You are not an asshole?
I agree with 23. It won't be pretty.
I think layoffs equal to another 10% of all associates are coming to the v100 in the next 12 months.
Batten down the hatches, folks.
I whole heartedly agree with #6. Actually getting a kick out of reading of how you lawyers are squirming in your own manure! My sympathy goes out to the over age 60 staff at Schiff. Now that over half their money in the 401K’s are gone. Its just heartless to set them out to pasture! No doubt a greedy, miserly partner thought that one up. No severance was mentioned either. What a dirty thing to do to people over 60 years of age!
I wonder how much they saved by "adjusting" their ALAS coverage?
I agree with #40, #6 is definitely an asshole.
Cracks me up - everyone bitches because people at other firms are getting let go, now your bitching because a firm is taking a rational business approach and trying to avoid doing layoffs.
I agree with #40, #6 is definitely an asshole.
NO U
Cracks me up - everyone bitches because people at other firms are getting let go, now your bitching because a firm is taking a rational business approach and trying to avoid doing layoffs.
Lawyers have to be highly paid don't you understand?! When firms do cost cutting they are violating the order of the universe. Same when they are defending the same cost-cutting at other corporations who are their clients. SEE THE LOGIC HERE?
Schiff has already laid off staff and asked quite a few attorneys to leave the firm.
40 - Spoken like a true executive assistant. Why would you 'get a kick' out of anything about the current situation? You sound like a typical staff - an overpaid, lazy, bitter rumor mill.
Mr. Safer needs to be institutionalized immediately. What kind of firm or managing committee for that matter allows its managing partner to go rogue and make financial assurances that the other partners are not willing to make? The answer is a non-peer firm with no vision. Any partner with an ounce of sanity at that firm would take his portables or book of business and defect to another firm where PPP is a priority over the financial health of the staff. Mr. Safer gets my vote for worst attorney of the week.
I suspect, however, Mr. Safer's memo is a smoke and mirrors ploy to lull associates into a false sense of job security. Remember, they will evaluate performances, meaning the pretext setup for termination is already in place. I am disappointed that firms still engage in dishonesty and subterfuge when discussing the steps to deal with the anemic economy. The bottom line is when the shit hits the fan, associates and staff will be the first in line to feel the mist of feces across their faces. The notion that partners will cut into their profits to save others is preposterous and I am not buying Mr. Safer's memo at all.
"Similarly, the Attorney Dinner Dance will not be
held this year."
Talk about burying the lede....
#46, you are being such an asshole. Why are you being like this?
Schiff Hardin has been laying off junior attorneys for months, calling it performance related.
46, you are being such an asshole. Why are you being like this?
Just tired of constant bitching by ATL over layoffs. Why are you being so SENSITIVE?
#49 - you shouldn't buy it. It's all smoke and mirrors. Schiff already let a bunch of people go.
Dear friends and colleagues:
I would like to formally retract my previous post #49 above. My sincere apologies for the vulgarisms. A recent and sudden change in my circumstances has caused me to view Mr. Safer's actions in an entirely new light. Huzzah Mr. Safer!
Sincerely,
Former Partner Emeritus
Why am I being such an asshole?
I think they've asked non-equity partners to leave as well. And staff.
A-hole carries the day.
23 is right and I think we should all encourage law firms to just get it over with. If you have to rescind offers, layoff, do whatever you gotta do, then just DO it so we can all get on with our lives. It sucks to be a 3L in deferred purgatory limbo, just waiting to see what happens next.
It is like dating that guy who doesn't have the balls to break up with you. Either do it or don't, we just need a straight answer.
40 here to 48 want know- why I get a kick out of it? Because I've watched you lawyers gang up on children, average Americans and people adversely affected by products and discrimination suits. Now you lawyers are getting the same treatment based upon the precedent you assisted corporations in building! Yes, it tickles me pink! Every dog has its day... its yours! You'd be surprise how energetic and intelligent executive really assistants are! Many know exactly where the bodies are!
40 here to 48 want know- why I get a kick out of it? Because I've watched you lawyers gang up on children, average Americans and people adversely affected by products and discrimination suits. Now you lawyers are getting the same treatment based upon the precedent you assisted corporations in building! Yes, it tickles me pink! Every dog has its day... its yours! You'd be surprise how energetic and intelligent executive assistants really are! Many know exactly where the bodies are!
40 here to 48 want know- why I get a kick out of it? Because I've watched you lawyers gang up on children, average Americans and people adversely affected by products and discrimination suits. Now you lawyers are getting the same treatment based upon the precedent you assisted corporations in building! Yes, it tickles me pink! Every dog has its day... its yours! You'd be surprise how energetic and intelligent executive assistants really are! Many know exactly where the bodies are!
59 - Want to go out sometime?
23/41
-dead on.
59
-dont be the pathetic girlfriend. You already know what he is going to do. Time to look into med school.
60-62 - you just proved your intelligence by multiple posts with mistakes. Kudos.
Schiff lost its number one billing partner to Sidley about a year ago. I left the firm (on my own) shortly thereafter for a smaller venue. There are maybe two serious billing partners left, both in transactional fields.
Schiff is known within inner circles for the horrendous treatments of its associates. I can attest to the fact that despite Mr. Safer's allegation to the contrary, that Schiff is not a "wonderful" place to work.
I know they have asked associates (I have no idea how many) to leave the firm in the past few months and there have been a suspicious number of income partners who have left recently as well.
Is Schiff the only decent-size firm in the country that doesn't subsidize health insurance premiums? I'd love to have no health benefits so that some newly minted lawyer can come in and get paid $160k. If it was truly the difference between saving jobs or not, it would be worth the $8000 hit. However, the above posts seem to indicate that Schiff is doing stealth layoffs anyways.
65 - LAWYERS SET THE PRECEDENT! NOW TAKE YOUR LUMPS!
61-by "get the same treatment," do you mean, for instance, having b.s. claims for racial discrimination by a janitor caught sleeping in the dorm rooms he was supposed to clean get thrown out of court? I don't understand how salary/benefits cuts are comparable. Please enlighten us.
Safer is full of it. Schiff Hardin asked junior associates to write memos illustrating how they intend to meet their hours requirement -- as if it is their fault that partners have not brought in any business and their hours are low. Schiff has used, and is using, these memos as a means to institute "performance-based terminations" of scores of associates. What they really need to do is have the partners write these memos and start eliminating under-performing partners. It's just that they are not smart enough to figure this out.
72- you are being such an asshole.
69 -- I am not referring to claims such as the one you described. I am, however, referring to legitimate claims against villainous corporations and other entities. I won't divulge case names, numbers, or venues because I'm not as stupid as you think. I’ve just enlightened you!
I stand by my comment
71
If you treat the people around you with love and respect, they will never guess that you're trying to get them sacked.
This whole blog is nothing but assholes.
Schiff is brilliant, especially if their health coverage is self-funded. Essentially, they'll be getting people out of their plan (those with access to cheaper health insurance are going to take it) thereby reducing the number of medical claims made on firm assets.
An associate with a spouse who also works (and receives subsidized health care) is going to move to his or her spouse's coverage (which is likely WAY cheaper than Schiff). When that associate needs surgery, delivers a baby, etc., Schiff won't have to pay the bill. Ching!
The memo from Ron Safer is disingenuous at best. Schiff has engaged in stealth layoffs of approx. 25 associates over the past several months (approx. 15-20% of the firm's total associates). It has also laid off 10% of staff with another round of staff cuts rumored to be in the works.
Schiff refuses to acknowledge the layoffs because Schiff's schtick has always been that it underpays compared to its competitors because it provides a superior culture.
Most Schiff attorneys and staff were stunned by Safer's e-mail and have been trying to determine whether Mr. Safer is engaging in brazen dishonesty or is simply delusional.
77- which part are you saying shocked them- losing all their benefits so the partners can save a grand or two each, or claiming they have not done layoffs when multiple commenters on here have suggested they've fired 20%? Bottom line- none of the partners at ANY firm give a fuck about any associates, PERIOD.
Yes Partner Emeritus, if the firm needs any info on how to marginalize a partner, they can ask Sutherland.
I fucked 2 Schiff Hardin partners up the ass in each of their offices, each of them took my big cock doggie style, and they each jerked their little cocks off when I unloaded in their asses.
That's so gay.
My good buddy just lateraled into STIFF HARDON as a litigation partner. He's toast.
Kudos to Schiff if they are truly trying to avoid laying off employees by cutting costs. A lot of fat can be trimmed from a law firm's overhead.
I'm sure PPP will decline at the majority of law firms this year. Probably to levels that, 4 years ago, would have been considered a great year, with huge bonuses for everyone. It's a shame when revenues and profits that should be considered great are instead considered terrible in comparison to the recent boom years.
The memo from Ron Safer is disingenuous at best. Schiff has engaged in stealth layoffs of approx. 25 associates over the past several months (approx. 15-20% of the firm's total associates). It has also laid off 10% of staff with another round of staff cuts rumored to be in the works.
Schiff refuses to acknowledge the layoffs because Schiff's schtick has always been that it underpays compared to its competitors because it provides a superior culture.
Most Schiff attorneys and staff were stunned by Safer's e-mail and have been trying to determine whether Mr. Safer is engaging in brazen dishonesty or is simply delusional.
#25 looks like a post from firm management, complete with the obligatory error "keeping moral (sic) high."
As a former Schiff partner, I can tell you that ever since the Sy Peck group left Schiff for Sidley a year ago, taking over 50% of Schiff's corporate business with them, the firm has been in a freefall. Schiff has a tremendous number of highly-skilled attorneys, but the firm is poorly-managed.
"VERO" --? Do we *need* an acronym for voluntary layoffs? If so, shouldn't the first word honestly be "Non-voluntary" and we could call it, more appropriately, "NERO"...
86- indeed, there seems to be no work distribution system to speak of. Some people billing 2400, some billing 800, and not just because the 2400 folks are "great". Management simply does not monitor work flow at all. It's totally random. If you happen to run into a partner in the hall you get the assignment.
This blog is ridiculous. You're all a bunch of losers. Maybe if you weren't spending so much time on ATL you would actually get some work done and thus would not be on the chopping block for performance related firings. It's a sh*t economy, suck it up, work hard, and you'll make it through. If you get laid off, the talented ones with personality will have no trouble finding another job. The only people truly fretting this economy are the ones who know they're overpaid and overvalued, and who have the social skills of a 10-year-old. The rest have nothing to worry about.
Please call me a loser or a deuche... just know that I'll be banging my hot girlfriend tonight while you're jerking off to softcore porn on Cinemax.
Why the refusal to be honest and just announce the layoffs like every other firm? Instead, Schiff goes through the charade of trashing associates who have done excellent work in the past in their performance reviews because they don't have enough work. That's not the associates' fault -- it's the result of having too many partners without business and the firm's practice of classifying new associates as "undesignated" so no practice group is responsible for assigning them an appropriate amount of work.
Why the refusal to be honest and just announce the layoffs like every other firm? Instead, Schiff goes through the charade of trashing associates who have done excellent work in the past in their performance reviews because they don't have enough work. That's not the associates' fault -- it's the result of having too many partners without business and the firm's practice of classifying new associates as "undesignated" so no practice group is responsible for assigning them an appropriate amount of work.
Why the refusal to be honest and just announce the layoffs like every other firm? Instead, Schiff goes through the charade of performance reviews and tells associates that they have somehow gone from doing great work to substandard work.
The real problem at Schiff is poor management. It hires associates without regard to the firm's needs and "allows" them to float around for a year or two. The reality is that unless they are lucky enough to latch onto one of the few partners with business, they languish without enough work to meet the billable requirements and without any guidance toward developing their skills. The firm would do better to unload more of the income partners with no business (and no inclination to go after any business) and to focus hiring with an aim to build up the firms' s strenghths - not hiring a bunch of law students who have no idea that there is no need for 10 of them in general litigation.
Why the refusal to be honest and just announce the layoffs like every other firm? Instead, Schiff goes through the charade of performance reviews and tells associates that they have somehow gone from doing great work to substandard work.
The real problem at Schiff is poor management. It hires associates without regard to the firm's needs and "allows" them to float around for a year or two. The reality is that unless they are lucky enough to latch onto one of the few partners with business, they languish without enough work to meet the billable requirements and without any guidance toward developing their skills. The firm would do better to unload more of the income partners with no business (and no inclination to go after any business) and to focus hiring with an aim to build up the firms' s strenghths - not hiring a bunch of law students who have no idea that there is no need for 10 of them in general litigation.
Why the refusal to be honest and just announce the layoffs like every other firm? Instead, Schiff goes through the charade of performance reviews and tells associates that they have somehow gone from doing great work to substandard work.
The real problem at Schiff is poor management. It hires associates without regard to the firm's needs and "allows" them to float around for a year or two. The reality is that unless they are lucky enough to latch onto one of the few partners with business, they languish without enough work to meet the billable requirements and without any guidance toward developing their skills. The firm would do better to unload more of the income partners with no business (and no inclination to go after any business) and to focus hiring with an aim to build up the firms' s strenghths - not hiring a bunch of law students who have no idea that there is no need for 10 of them in general litigation.
Why the refusal to be honest and just announce the layoffs like every other firm? Instead, Schiff goes through the charade of performance reviews and tells associates that they have somehow gone from doing great work to substandard work.
The real problem at Schiff is poor management. It hires associates without regard to the firm's needs and "allows" them to float around for a year or two. The reality is that unless they are lucky enough to latch onto one of the few partners with business, they languish without enough work to meet the billable requirements and without any guidance toward developing their skills. The firm would do better to unload more of the income partners with no business (and no inclination to go after any business) and to focus hiring with an aim to build up the firms' s strenghths - not hiring a bunch of law students who have no idea that there is no need for 10 of them in general litigation.
Why the refusal to be honest and just announce the layoffs like every other firm? Instead, Schiff goes through the charade of performance reviews and tells associates that they have somehow gone from doing great work to substandard work.
The real problem at Schiff is poor management. It hires associates without regard to the firm's needs and "allows" them to float around for a year or two. The reality is that unless they are lucky enough to latch onto one of the few partners with business, they languish without enough work to meet the billable requirements and without any guidance toward developing their skills. The firm would do better to unload more of the income partners with no business (and no inclination to go after any business) and to focus hiring with an aim to build up the firms' s strenghths - not hiring a bunch of law students who have no idea that there is no need for 10 of them in general litigation.
I had a callback with this firm's Chicago office in late September. It was obvious that the firm sucked hard, even before they'd laid off anyone.
You might want to check this out: http://eriklundegaard.com/pdf/Safer.pdf
No. 98 - are you David Milberg (firm's PR guy)?
No. 98 - are you David Milberg (firm's PR guy)?
No. 98 - are you David Milberg (firm's PR guy)?
No. 98 - are you David Milberg (firm's PR guy)?
No. 98 - thank you for bringing that to our attention. If Ron Safer was an effective prosecutor, then clearly he can't also be the dishonest, deceitful creep that is engaging in stealth layoffs of 20% or more of Schiff's associates, while issuing press releases lauding himself for not engaging in layoffs.
No. 98 - thank you for bringing that to our attention. If Ron Safer was an effective prosecutor, then clearly he can't also be the dishonest, deceitful creep that is engaging in stealth layoffs of 20% or more of Schiff's associates, while issuing press releases lauding himself for not engaging in layoffs.
98, you actually raise a good point, albeit inadvertently. Nobody on here has questioned Safer’s record as a litigator. Nor has anyone raised doubt that some of the matters he has undertaken are for tremendous overall good. The problem is that he has been Managing Partner for roughly four-five years now and spends more than 3/4ths of his time out litigating rather than “managing” the firm. Thus, there is little to no oversight and the firm is horrendously run.
He probably honestly believes that what he put in his memo is true, when 99% of the firm (including you 98) know that it is false.
86 - Googled "Sy Peck" and he is a M&A/Private Equity guy. If he took 50% of that business a year ago at the start of the Recession sounds like a blessing.
Since when have performance based evaluations been a bad thing? I heard lawyers at all levels, including equity partners, have been asked to perform or leave. Maybe 86 was one of them.
I think that memo is refreshing.
Every time one of these firms takes some action to adjust to these terrible economic times these comment boards blow up with criticism. If every poster is so brilliant, where are the posts with the solutions?
106-108 (I'm guessing you are the same person since you posted three times in 14 minutes after no one had posted in over 24 hours).
Sy Peck's clients also were responsible for 25% of the firm's L&E work, 15% of litigation, etc. The combination of losing those clients and the fact that the Peck group didn't take any associates with them devastated the firm even before the further downturn in the economy in the past 6-9 months.
#107 - if you believe what you wrote, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell your ass. The firm has gotten rid of something like 1% or 2% of partners vs. 20% associates in the past six months.
#107 and 108 - I have no problem with performance- based layoffs. That probably accounts for half of the Schiff layoffs, at the most. Anyone in the know can tell you that the other half are clearly economic layoffs. If a firm needs to do that, fine, but own up to it. Don't claim a dismissal to be performance-based when you know that to be fallacious.
It's easy to blame Ron Safer for everything now, but he has been contending for years with an ossified, pork-fed gang of partners hellbent on keeping his hands tied. Schiff management has been pulling every trick in the stealth book since long before he took over. The HR Manager and others have been shuffling job titles and desriptions (note to Schiffers: Look them up on Spoke) so that staffers do not know to whom they report; and abused employees do not know whom to name in the steadily increasing lawsuits. A former employee recently filed against the firm and its HR Manager, who conveniently became the "former" HR Manager, while visibly retaining the same position. Staffers who ask for written policies or job postings or desriptions are told that they are "lost". Not one member of Schiff middle management has ever held a position for which anyone else has ever been considered. The "paralegal supervisor" has never been a paralegal or any other kind of legal professional, yet she sits in judgment of people with 100 times her qualifications. Schiff's 1750 hour billing requirement for paralegals is highest in the country, imposed by someone who has never billed a single hour. She also juggles work projects in order to influence who is or is not perceived as a productive employee. Certain ones are allowed to let work languish undone for months, while operating profit businesses of their own on the firm's time. Others are warned to make their billablles. People are told - in April - that they aren't going to make it. People who complain about the system are told that "We've been getting a lot of complaints about your performance." And the so-called officers of the firm spend a lot of time and effort keeping the whole works from being upset by Ron Safer. It's all done under the table, "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain" style.
By the way, who IS the current HR manager? And what's with that "Fun Department?"
Shouldn't we all be grateful for our jobs.
111, are you in Schiff management? At least, now we know where the money for our lost bonuses, raises, Christmas party, staff appreciation day, company picnic, and health benefits is going. It's in Paris with the HR manager. She should not have a job when she gets back. Staff should meet her at the door and escort her out. And WE are supposed to be grateful to YOU. You're beautiful.
110 - "[S]teadily increasing lawsuits"?
Without naming specifics, who is bringing these (laid off associates, partners, staff??) and under what theories? How many lawsuits against the firm do you know of?
By way of updating the comments made here, our friend Mr. Safer in his own self delusional way expressed great disappointment that anyone at Schiff would leak an internal memo to ATL. That said, he has continued to work hard to ensure that partner profits remain high and any economic discomfort comes at the expense of staff and non-partner attorneys. Salaries have been cut, work opportunities shifted around so that attorneys could then be given poor reviews for lack of performance all while encouraging an everyone for themselves attitude among associates while appearing not to do so. Yet firm revenues remain at the "expected" rate according to some equity partners [cudos to the one who can successfully translate that comment].
Indeed, this has been going on here for some time. Brown nosers generally are safe, but the surest path to job security is... a little diversity goes a long way.