Add RSS RSS

Musical Chairs: Another Partner Leaves Akin Gump

Akin Gump logo.JPGAkin Gump is dealing with another partner defection. AmLaw Daily is reporting that a big time litigator is leaving Akin Gump for Quinn Emanuel:

Andrew Rossman, former cohead of litigation at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, kept bumping into lawyers from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges on various cases, and came away impressed every time.

So Rossman, who has lived in and around New York city for his entire life, decided to leave Akin Gump this week to take a spot in Quinn’s growing New York office.

Rossman was more impressed with the Quinn lawyers he “kept bumping into” than his colleagues he worked with every day at Akin Gump? Ouch.

Some sort of an exodus seems to be taking place at Akin. The firm lost 17% of its partners last year.

More details after the jump.

Quinn logo.jpgAmLaw describes the flight of Akin partners this way:

[Andrew Rossman] says the choice to move is unrelated to Akin’s recent hemorrhaging of partners; the firm lost 59 partners in 2008, more than any firm we tracked here at The American Lawyer. And many of them left with unhappy feelings for the firm’s decision to reduce some practices that management considered less lucrative (such as patent licensing and individual plaintiff employment defense) in favor of an emphasis on the New York office, according to this story from the February issue of The American Lawyer.

Well, at least it doesn’t have anything to do with Akin’s decision to (kind of) unfreeze associate salaries.

Akin Gump pulled in about $1.2 million in profits per partner according to AmLaw. Quinn takes in $3.3 million. Maybe it is as simple as that?

Another Akin Defection: Cohead of Litigation Heading to Quinn Emanuel [AmLaw Daily]

Earlier: Partners Leaving Akin Gump
Akin Gump: Salary Unfreeze Update
Quinn Is Rolling In It

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:43 PM

Hungry for life, firsty for NAYA

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:45 PM

Paul Hastings still makes this place look like a shit circus.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:46 PM

are associates at paul hastings really starting in october?

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:47 PM

ATL is boring today

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:47 PM

This can be only good news for senior associates. Time to upgrade that 3500 sq ft wife to a 7500 sq ft model, kids. Three cheers for Texis.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:48 PM

I'm nervous about how this will effect moral.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:48 PM

texus

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:48 PM

Dare say that the ship is sinking when your head of litigation packs up and leaves.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:48 PM

Dare say that the ship is sinking when your head of litigation packs up and leaves.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:49 PM

I wonder if Akin can sue under promissory estoppel?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:49 PM

I smell another Heller Ehrman coming on at the other end of the country.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:51 PM

will someone explain ppp -- is that mean of what all equity partners bring in?

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:52 PM

Texass Lobster says yeeeee huh?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:53 PM

QUINN REMAINS

In ur law firm, stealin' ur partnerz

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:53 PM

WHO CARES!!
Get a life, you inside baseball law firm dorks. Do you understand that the names of these crappy firms mean nothing to about 99.99% of America.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:53 PM

WHO CARES!!
Get a life, you inside baseball law firm dorks. Do you understand that the names of these crappy firms mean nothing to about 99.99% of America?

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:56 PM

My gump is killing me today.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:56 PM

I smell another Road Warrior coming on at the other end of the country.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:57 PM

Some will come, some will go

http://productliability.law360.com/articles/96549

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:59 PM

Someone kicked me in the gump and now its akin.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:59 PM

This defection is irrelevant. I'm pleased to report that Akin's Philadelphia office is holding steady at nine lawyers: http://www.akingump.com/attorneys/List.aspx?Offices=7c40e4aa-9ef8-40f0-a50b-51b2d23d2f02
Quinn doesn't even have a Philadelphia office. Akin rocks here.
--Phat in Philly

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:00 PM

15/16 -- you realize we here are the .01 that care, right?

23 Posted by BigTex Sammy | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:00 PM

I tell ya, Akin was once successful when it focused on its Texas roots. Like anything that turns to the East Coast, it comes out with its tail 'tween its legs. Everyone knows the toughest firms are in Texas. When we secede, y'all will wish you had jobs down here.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:04 PM

22--Speak for yourself.

By the way, what the f. is an Akin Gump? Is it related to Forest? Is it a synomym for an inured nerd?

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:05 PM

If you lateral from one crappy ass firm to another crappy ass firm, are you really entitled to ATL coverage?

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:06 PM

I always thought of Akin as a lobbying shop with some lawyers there to keep up the notion of a traditional law firm. I know the firm's roots are in TX, but I thought this place would be hopping now with Democratic lobbyists bringing in the $$.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:07 PM

Does anyone know if Quinn still advertises in airports?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:10 PM

Texas governor talking about secession...

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:17 PM

It's my understanding that John Quinn is psychotic. I think he and Lat like to get nakey with some cocoa butter thought, so watch this post get deleted in the next 5-10 min. (Note, many newsworthy episodes at Quinn never quite make it onto ATL - infer what you will).

-GW 1L

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:17 PM

For those of you still wondering what the secret is to "hanging a shingle" and being successful, just follow this business model:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123984994639523745.html

And where is the ATL expose on this? You can bet that if Republicans were involved this would have already gotten three posts and an extended Elie political diatribe.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:18 PM

um who cares? at all?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:20 PM

This is what happens when you have Forrest Gump and Chauncey Gardner as the founding partners.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:21 PM

QUINN REMAINS REMAINS

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:21 PM

This is what happens when you have Forrest Gump and Chauncey Gardner as the founding partners.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:24 PM

29, whats "cocoa butter thought." Sounds like something from Barbershop II.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:24 PM

if he was having sex with his clients, kinky spalding would have been the firm to work for - i hear they actively recruit partners who have had sex with clients at their current firm - especially lesbians

i also hear they have a transvestite in one of their satellite offices who is beleived by some to be having sex with a lesbian partner in the same firm

he would have had a lot more fun at kinky spalding

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:25 PM

There will be more partner losses at AG because the partner compensation review just ended. My understanding is that partners were informed of their 2009 points yesterday. There are probably quite a few unhappy partners today.

The firm does have a very strong lobbying practice (as well as bankruptcy and private equity/funds), but lobbyists work on retainer. It's not the cash cow the same way bankruptcy work is. You're on a $10k/month (for example) retainer, no matter how much work you actually do for the client. But the lobbying group still brings in about $100 million per year for the firm.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:29 PM

serious question: when guys like this leave, do they have a farewell cake party?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:32 PM

What about the mass exodus of partners from McDermott Will & Emery?

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:36 PM

I hear cocoa butter helps with stretch marks

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:41 PM

That defecting partner is full of shit -- he's following the money, pure and simple. I've yet to meet a Quinn partner and walk away favorably impressed. I honestly don't know how they manage to be so profitable. Perhaps they hire smart associates?

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:46 PM

As 42 said, this was a money grab by Andy, nothing more, nothing less.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:48 PM

42: replace smart with douchebag and you might be on to something

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:51 PM

Paul Hastings makes this place look like as wire hangered shit circus.......

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:10 PM

BREAKING NEWS : Partner Emeritus is doing one hour overtime work at the other side of the glory hole!

--Mohammad

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:11 PM

BREAKING NEWS : Partner Emeritus is doing one hour overtime work at the other side of the glory hole!

--Mohammad

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:19 PM

Elie - Akin Gump had PPP of 1.4 million for 2008. You are citing numbers from a couple of years ago.

Nonetheless, 42 is (more likely than not) correct. I'm sure Rossman is getting more $$$ from Quinn.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:21 PM

Hey 3,

Sure are. Summers are going full length also. Damn it feels good to be a gangsta.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:32 PM

Opposing counsel once referred to co-counsel as Akim Gimp. Love it.

Also, I love the promissory estoppel troll!

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:42 PM

Can ATL please do an article on the state of DC law firms?
There is plenty on NYC, LA, and other markets but nothing that has dealt with DC. A&P looked to be in trouble a while back. Akin is, well. Some of my friends in DC have suggested it is worse than NYC.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:42 PM

Can ATL please do an article on the state of DC law firms?
There is plenty on NYC, LA, and other markets but nothing that has dealt with DC. A&P looked to be in trouble a while back. Akin is, well. Some of my friends in DC have suggested it is worse than NYC.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:42 PM

Can ATL please do an article on the state of DC law firms?
There is plenty on NYC, LA, and other markets but nothing that has dealt with DC. A&P looked to be in trouble a while back. Akin is, well. Some of my friends in DC have suggested it is worse than NYC.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:46 PM

Good for him. We all know it's just about the money, and that's a perfectly good reason to make the move.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:54 PM

39 - usually they get hsown the door without even getting to pack up their stuff, because the second a partner resigns, she/he becomes a competitor. It's an ugly business.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:57 PM

When Quinn the eskimo gets here everybody's gonna jump for joy!

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:10 PM

if he was having sex with his clients, kinky spalding would have been the firm to work for - i hear they actively recruit partners who have had sex with clients at their current firm - especially lesbians

i also hear they have a transvestite in one of their satellite offices who is beleived by some to be having sex with a lesbian partner in the same firm

he would have had a lot more fun at kinky spalding

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:20 PM

Mcdermott cant keep a partner like they cant keep a case

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:21 PM

Mcdermott cant keep a partner like they cant keep a case

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:22 PM

Latham keeps on taking on new and exciting partners in areas like derivatives and fund formation.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:32 PM

McDermott blows.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:36 PM

60 -- who in fund formation? office?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:37 PM

I am convinced that McStinker has the most mediocre lawyers of all the big low shops. At least in New York. Hence, they don't have any business. Go to hell, McStinker.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:41 PM

MysTTTal REMAINS

fat and incompetent

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:24 PM

if he was having sex with his clients, kinky spalding would have been the firm to work for - i hear they actively recruit partners who have had sex with clients at their current firm - especially lesbians

i also hear they have a transvestite in one of their satellite offices who is beleived by some to be having sex with a lesbian partner in the same firm

he would have had a lot more fun at kinky spalding

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:55 PM

Achey Gump will be shut down by 2012, as will about half og the law firms out there. Big firm lawyers are in huge trouble.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:55 PM

Achey Gump will be shut down by 2012, as will about half of the law firms out there. Big firm lawyers are in huge trouble.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:59 PM

53:
State of DC Firms=They suck. You're f_ _ _ _ _. About half of large DC firms are expected to be shut by 2013, and many firms based elsewhere are closing/will close their DC offices. I suggest you get a new skill.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:11 PM

AG isn't going to shut down. It might, however, get bought out. The lobbying, bankruptcy, and funds practices are some of the best in the industry - plus there are some big names in litigation (John Dowd, the king of DC white collar work, and Tom Goldstein, the queen of appellate lit). Weil was going after AG for a while, so those merger talks may again heat up in the next year or two.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:49 PM

53: Your friends mention any specific firms?

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 9:17 PM

I think the merger talk is pretty accurate. Akin's management is simply woeful--Mclean has hung on for far too long--but there are a number of incredibly strong practices and with all of the departures (forced or otherwise) the remaining firm is actually incredibly strong and profitable (albeit not full service). Something like a Weil, Willkie, etc. would probably make some sense--a more "established" firm with better management that could integrate Akin's existing practices. Of course, if that did happen, they would probably jettison the Texas offices to an even larger degree than they have already.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 9:44 PM

69 - Goldstein doesn't bring in a penny worth of business.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 10:21 PM

69 - what are you talking about. You actually sounded like you had a clue until you suggested Weil was going after Akin. Not only would that be a bad fit, but it would destroy the value that Akin has. Akin's strongest group is bankruptcy. Right, just like Weil. Which is why someone without a clue might make up a plausible-enough sounding rumor like that. But Weil and Akin are almost always on opposite sides. Weil represents debtors and Akin represents creditors. Have you also heard any rumors about S&C going after Milberg Weiss?

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 10:23 PM

Goldstein is a joke among the stronger appellate practices in D.C. He gets points for hustling to get in the game, but he cannot command the big fees

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 10:28 PM

69, are you high -- Dowd the "King of DC white collar work". That is crazy talk. Thanks for the laugh, though.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:17 PM

69 here.

Bruce McLean confirmed to DC Associates near the end of last year that he had previously been in merger talks with Weil's management - and he made it sound as though Weil was the pursuer. So that one was straight from the ass's mouth. The fact that AG does mostly creditor work doesn't really matter - as long as you can work out the conflicts issues the substantive matters are the same.

True, Goldstein doesn't bring in any real paying work, and is considered a joke by plenty of people in the firm (hence my snark). Patricia Millett and Michelle Roberts, on the other hand, are fucking amazing appellate litigators. It's a shame they are forced to operate behind Tommy's skirt.

If you know the DC while collar world, there are few who are bigger than Dowd. He represents tons of major Republican politicians, and has brought in a massive amount of work related to the banking/financial scandals.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 12:11 AM

wouldn't the akin bankruptcy group be in conflict with weil's focus? i.e., weil is a debtor shop...akin primarily represents committees and individual creditors (significant ones at that)

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 3:14 AM

Quinn had PPP of $3.3 million in 2008 and lays off 10 staff. Talk about pieces of shit.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 8:33 AM

69/76 - you are just proving you are even more ignorant than suspected. How do you clear conflicts when you have two firms on opposite sides of a case? That is not a waivable conflict. And the substantive matters are not the same. Yes, they are generically "bankruptcy" but debtors work and creditors work are very diffferent. I call bs that you heard anyone say any such thing.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 9:07 AM

69/76 - You are a retard. I work at Akin, and Bruce McLean never said any such thing. You're also wrong about the appellate group - Michell Roberts works at the trial level. If she's doing appellate work, it's irregular.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 9:58 AM

According to that egghead on the cover of Newsweek, the economy will not return to full employment until 2013 to 2014. If that's close right, associates are in for some shit in the next few years.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 10:01 AM

68:

I don't work in DC. Horrific assumption of your part. Just lousy. FYI -- next time you want to be clever and write tough, just don't bother.

53

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 10:01 AM

68:

I don't work in DC. Horrific assumption of your part. Just lousy. FYI -- next time you want to be clever and write tough, just don't bother.

53

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 10:01 AM

68:

I don't work in DC. Horrific assumption of your part. Just lousy. FYI -- next time you want to be clever and write tough, just don't bother.

53

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 11:19 AM

79/80 - Ask anyone that went to the town halls at the end of last year. I think it was at the first one, because I recall that Tony Pierce led the second one, not Bruce. Someone asked Bruce about mergers, and he mentioned that "the phones have actually been quiet recently" but that up until a few months before he had been getting calls on a weekly basis. He mentioned Weil specifically, and added "but who would want to work with those assholes?"

And obviously, you can't waive conflicts when you're on opposite sides of the same case. But Akin does represent debtors on occasion. Most of the partners in the group have experience on both sides, they just focus on the creditors' committees b/c they can't compete with firms like Weil for the major debtor work.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 11:54 AM

85 - you may work at Akin, but you are clearly just stupid. All of the value of the Akin bankruptcy partners lies in their relationships with creditors. Why would they move to Weil, where they don't have those relationships and therefore don't have the business generation value? And why would Weil acquire the firm if the most valuable department were to leave? And by the way, what does committee representation have to do with ability/inability to compete for debtors work? They are each about as lucrative, just different work. It's not like Akin is shooting for debtors-side and settling for creditors? Since when is Tony Pierce leading town-halls? Also, McLean would never say that.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 12:19 PM

85 - you are ridiculous.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 12:23 PM

if he was having sex with his clients, kinky spalding would have been the firm to work for - i hear they actively recruit partners who have had sex with clients at their current firm - especially lesbians

i also hear they have a transvestite in one of their satellite offices who is beleived by some to be having sex with a lesbian partner in the same firm

he would have had a lot more fun at kinky spalding

plus, i hear that teabagging is very popular at kinky spalding

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 12:40 PM

It's really funny to be called stupid by people who have absolutely no idea what they're talking about.

Billing rates for debtor work are at least 20% higher than for creditor work. Weil bills well north of $1000 for its restructuring partners, while no one at AG gets more than about $800. You also need a much larger team to handle the biggest debtor cases, which is why Akin can't compete with the big NY firms. So why would AG partners consider merging? For the money, obviously.

There were at least 50 people in the room when Bruce made the "assholes" comment, and Tony led the last town hall of 2008 and both this year (pre- and post-layoffs).

Finally, you know nothing about how bankruptcy partners generate business. Hint - the partners show up to the creditor committee meetings and pitch themselves. It's the firm's reputation that gets the business, much more than the partner's contacts.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 1:18 PM

89 - seriously, you are spewing retarded garbage. Weil is billing $650 -$950 for partners on Lehman:

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202425168514

The only firm that has really tried to bill more than $1000 per hour for debtor-side bankruptcy work is Sidley (in the Chi Tribune case), and they got denied.

Akin partners bill the same as other big BK firms (all the way up to the amounts listed in that article).

Please don't ever post here again. You are either clueless or trying to stir up a mess.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 1:45 PM

89 - you are seriously retard. Weil partners are billing between $650 and $950 for Lehman, the biggest bankruptcy case in history:

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202425168514

Sidley is the only firm that has tried billing over $1000 for debtor-side bankruptcy work, and they got shut down. That was in the Chicago Tribune case.

It's clear that you nothing. Please stop posting. You are either ridiculously uninformed or trying to stir up a mess.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 1:46 PM

if he was having sex with his clients, kinky spalding would have been the firm to work for - i hear they actively recruit partners who have had sex with clients at their current firm - especially lesbians

i also hear they have a transvestite in one of their satellite offices who is beleived by some to be having sex with a lesbian partner in the same firm

he would have had a lot more fun at kinky spalding

plus, i hear that teabagging is very popular at kinky spalding

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 1:46 PM

89 - you are seriously retard. Weil partners are billing between $650 and $950 for Lehman, the biggest bankruptcy case in history:

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202425168514

Sidley is the only firm that has tried billing over $1000 for debtor-side bankruptcy work, and they got shut down. That was in the Chicago Tribune case.

It's clear that you nothing. Please stop posting. You are either ridiculously uninformed or trying to stir up a mess.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 2:21 PM

No wonder Akin is a such a shiTTTy firm -just look at the idiots who post here defending it. It's hard to believe that people in DC used to consider them just below firms like A&P or Hogan. Now they'd be lucky to be named in the same breath as DLA Piper or Steptoe. I think even Heller and Coudert are held in higher esteem.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 2:55 PM

94 = 89 after losing on the facts.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 4:22 PM

Dowd is a has-been. He hit his peak 20 years ago with the "Dowd Report."

Other than ensure that Pete Rose will never be in the Hall of Fame (despite being the best hitter in baseball history, what else has Dowd done?

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 4:23 PM

Dowd is a has-been. He hit his peak 20 years ago with the "Dowd Report."

Other than ensure that Pete Rose will never be in the Hall of Fame (despite being the best hitter in baseball history), what else has Dowd done?

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 17, 2009 4:27 PM

96/97 = 94 taking a new line of attack.

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, April 18, 2009 11:01 AM

I'm 89 (but not 94, sorry).

Dowd represents, among others, the McCain family, Monica Goodling, and a failed lender under congressional investigation. The latter case has had enough doc review to keep 8+ associates busy since August, with no end in sight. And it's worth noting that none of Dowd's people got laid off, though there were at least four litigators axed in DC.

Dowd may not be the biggest name anymore, but he's about the first guy Republicans turn to when they're in the shit - though more for Congressional issues than straight up litigation.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 20, 2009 2:01 PM

Anybody who screwed over Pete Rose and then tried to help a moron wacko like Monica Goodling is a loser, as far as I'm concerned. Shame on him.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 20, 2009 2:06 PM

I forgot about Dowd's connection to Pete Rose. Pete Rose is an American hero. He's as American as apple pie. Anybody who takes him down is anti-American. Dowd is a socialist.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 20, 2009 2:07 PM

I forgot about Dowd's connection to Pete Rose. Pete Rose is an American hero. He's as American as apple pie. Anybody who takes him down is unAmerican. Dowd is a socialist.

Post Your Comment