Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Pay Freeze Watch: Skadden Freezes Counsel Salaries

Skadden logo.JPGThere is late breaking news from Skadden tonight. Apparently the firm has decided to freeze salaries on its counsels. Here is the memo Skadden counsel received:

TO: Counsel

RE: Compensation

Given the current economic conditions and the level of activity within the firm, we have decided that we will not be increasing salaries for counsel in 2009. As always, payment of discretionary bonuses will be contingent upon levels of activity in the Firm’s practice areas, the economic environment as it affects our Firm and individual performance.

We are grateful for your continued commitment to the Firm.

That timing could have been better. But we understand that counsel pay has historically been decided on May 1st, so the firm needed to make a decision.

Skadden has not frozen salaries on associates, and the firm paid top-of-the-market bonuses to its personnel.

The firm has avoided laying associates off during this recession, but Skadden’s Sidebar Program allowed approximately 125 attorneys to take a year-long deferral from the firm.

Earlier: Associate Bonus Watch: Here Comes Skadden
Skadden’s Sidebar: Phase One Complete

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:00 PM

First? Duke

2 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:02 PM

This is proof that even of counsel or as I like to call them "Hopefuls Holding Out," are not immune to hybrid tough love. My dreams are slowly becoming a reality.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:03 PM

to think everyone was shitting on some other firm first when bonuses came out

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:03 PM

Does this mean that Skadden counsel actively read ATL?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:04 PM

Hey Skadden Secure,

How do like this.....haha

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:04 PM

I think it's pretty cool that a firm would freeze counsel salaries before freezing an associates salary, or just laying them off.

7 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:04 PM

The ship be sinking...

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:06 PM

As a Skadden 2L summer associate, how terrified should I be on a scale of 1 to 14?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:07 PM

What is the typical comp range for a counsel at Skadden?

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:07 PM

This was the only story actually worth posting today. The KS story would have been, too, if you hadn't let people be awful about it.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:08 PM

PE - You meant "wet" dreams

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:14 PM

(.) (.)

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:17 PM

First

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:25 PM

Skadden has only avoided laying off people if staff attorneys and non-attorney staff are not people.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:25 PM

I didn't even know of counsel had lockstep increases; I thought they negotiated their salaries on a case-by-case basis.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:31 PM

Now is the time to crack each others' heads open and feast on the goo inside.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:32 PM

14, I think, has it right. Skadden is like Cravath in that they cannot be looked at as weak. Of Counsel are disposable people. Nobody really knows they are there.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:32 PM

Does anyone know how much counsel are paid at Skadden (or elsewhere)???

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:32 PM

Does anyone know how much counsel are paid at Skadden (or elsewhere)???

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:33 PM

Freezing salaries is a lot better than reducing salaries, wihch is what they did to counsel at stroock.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:36 PM

12 - low hanging boobs or eyes?

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:37 PM

The partners gathered to vote,
On how to keep Skadden afloat.
"Let's freeze the pay,
Of our counsel today!
They're clearly not lawyers of note."
- Another Trite LImerickist

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:38 PM

I got the impression (as a summer) that these guys made anywhere from 300-600, negotiated each year. Why would they announce a freeze, when there was no structure to begin with?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:39 PM

if you become counsel at skadden, isn't that a "promotion" from being an associate? if so, is this a way to send a signal to the high salaried "senior associates"?

it's not that same as "of counsel," which are the former partners, individuals with technical expertise, etc.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:41 PM

24 - I wouldn't call it a promotion. It seems more like a you work your ass off an make us a lot of money but we'll never trust you with clients or leadership kinda move.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:43 PM

Aren't they structured a lot like Latham?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:46 PM

Are they on suicide watch now?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:48 PM

Counsel are more like trophies and sometimes get tarnished.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:48 PM

Counsel at Skadden do make a lot of money, so this is really non-news. They'll make it back in bonus or when everything recovers.

It is true that some counsel do have negotiated pay packages, but for most counsel, being promoted means you continue with lockstep pay increases above the $285,000 cap for a typical associate.

There are other perks as well, but, as some have noted here, counsel are not partners. Some have the opportunity to become partners later, others do not. The longer one remains a counsel, as a rule, the less hope one can have of ever making partner.

On the other hand, 300-600k (or more) is still a lot better money than some partners in smaller shops. It's still Skadden and everything that comes along with that fact.

30 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:51 PM

Poster no. 17 is correct about how peer firms view "of counsel" personnel. The "of counsel" designation was designed to slow down the inflation of partner ranks. When I started my legal career in 1968, a normal equity partnership track for star associates was 5-6 years. In the early 80s, this was increased to 7-8 years. To further slowdown the dilution of profits per partner, creative partnership track models were created (i.e., non-equity, income partners, etc.). "Of counsel" are mostly attorneys that have some talent (legal skill) but little to no ability to draw big clients or business. They are given a couple of years to prove us wrong and if not, they are shown the door. Unfortunately, I believe this is what happened to Mark Levy at KS. Mr. Levy in my opinion took the coward's way out. He had contacts with the Clinton administration and could have landed on his feet in the Obama administration (i.e., cushy govt. job making six figures at DOJ). Mr. Levy was a hopeful holding out on an illusory dream. Apparently, the failure of accomplishing that dream destroyed his weak will and now his poor family must suffer.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:53 PM

Id lateral to skadden if I could

- v5

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:57 PM

is counsel the same thing as "special counsel"??

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:59 PM

I would say this is a very Latham thing to do, but then again, they are not conducting mass firings so I guess it wouldn't be appropriate.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:00 PM

at Bingham, it goes 1 - 5th year associate, then two years of counsel, then eligible for partner. Skadden probably just copied that model.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:05 PM

Yowza! Wowza! Honestly, though, who the fuck cares? This means nothing for anyone that reads/posts on ATL.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:12 PM

Limericks are the only shtick on ATL that isn't intolerable garbage.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:15 PM

YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS
-SKADDEN PRESTIGE

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:24 PM

why reduce salaries when you can just fire?

-Dave Gordon, MP of Latham

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:25 PM

"Counsel" is NOT the same as "of counsel" at Skadden. "Of counsel" is a similar to a "professor emeritus" and provides mostly consulting on cases.

"Counsel" are attorneys that have come up through the associate ranks--some counsels go on to make partner, and others are content to stay "counsel." You make bank without having the pressure of being a Skadden partner.

Despite how transparent Skadden is about its associate compensation, they are very hush-hush about counsel compensation.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:30 PM

8... on a scale of 1 -10 --- ZERO

Skadden isnt going anywhere. Neither is Cravath. Or Sullivan. Or any of the true NY heavyweights. They make enough money to weather the storm even in bad times. Any firm whos PPP can sink by 1/4 and they still remain in the top 10 for PPP is a safe place to be, and that goes for Skadden too. IT is the #1 grossing law firm in the US. Dont worry.

Unless you are going to one of their non-NY,DC,Chicago, or LA offices. Then yeah worry a little, a very very little

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:48 PM

Anyone see that Boston Legal episode where the autistic of-counsel doesn't make partner at his 15th year and then snaps and holds a knife to the managing partner's throat? That will start happening everyday here pretty soon...

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:52 PM

Ruh roh, one of the kiddies just figured out how to post ascii pr0n

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:55 PM

30

I see that Partner Emeritus has reinflated his wind bag...

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:57 PM

Skadden is kicking itself for paying bonuses at twice the level that everyone else paid this year.

Also, no announced associate layoffs =/= no associate layoffs.

45 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:02 PM

This comment is addressed to post no. 41.

I recall in December of 1986, a senior associate (11th year I believe) was relieved of his position. His reaction was to take a dozen aspirin in his office. The paramedics were called and his attempted "suicide" was the talk of the week at the firm. The associate in question lacked a spine. He was told year after year to look for an alternative opportunity but he continued to hope and hold out on becoming partner. I saw straight through his suicide attempt, which was nothing more than a pathetic ploy to garner attention on himself. After this incident, the firm implemented the escort policy. A terminated employee is given five minutes to gather what they can and then he/she is escorted out of the premises. All other personnel belongings and effects are fedexed to the terminated employee. The escort policy minimizes fanfare and the drama of an outgoing malcontent associate or counsel. What happened at KS would never happen at a peer firm. The closest a terminated employee can come back to our building is the lobby before the security terminal. All terminated personnel are considered persona non grata at the firm and the building. For the record, a terminated attorney who cannot take his/her own life is too much of a coward to take someone else's life. I sleep well at night and I give terminated employees no thought after their departure.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:07 PM

30 (Partner Emeritus)- I remember you, I fucked you up the ass doggie style in your office with my big cock, you moaned like a bitch in heat until I shot my load up your ass, you jerked your little prick off afterwards.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:10 PM

Counsel's a really popular positions for specialists. On any given M&A deal, a big corporate firm like Skadden might need a tax specialist, an IP specialist, an environmental law specialist, a labor law specialist, an employee benefits specialist, etc. You need really good attorneys on staff with a lot of knowledge to do this work and negotiate these deal points. But for the most part (though certainly not always), these attorneys exist to provide advice to other partner's clients. It's hard to be a rainmaking employee benefits partner at a firm like Skadden. And if you were a rainmaking partner with a ton of your own clients, you probably wouldn't be providing specialist support to other people's clients. 20 years ago it wasn't a big deal to make a really skillful specialist a partner. But in today's legal world, where the ranks of equity partners shrink every year to push profits up, you don't get a seat at that table unless you can bring in business to match. And that's where the counsel position can really come in handy for firms. It's a way to retain skilled lawyers that are critically important to the firm, but will never generate $2.5 million a year in profit.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:11 PM

PE: Be careful not to inflate that wind bag with a lot of hot gas...

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:14 PM

I haven't gotten laid in 2 months at my V10 firm. Is it just me or is it harder to get paralegal or assistant pussy in this market??

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:16 PM

I also remember fucking Partner Emeritus up the ass without a rubber

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:18 PM

Who put this dick on my back?

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:19 PM

50

Did you get a long, self righteous lecture afterwards???

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:21 PM

Hmm. I don't remember having ANY significant relationship with Partner Emeritus in the past. What's the deal?

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:25 PM

46/50 ditto.... I fucked Partner Emeritus up the ass also

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:29 PM

i remember partner emeritus. I didn't fuck him but a bunch of buddies got together and bukkaked all over his face.

partner emeritus, shut the fuck up. your schtick is tired and annoying.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:31 PM

54-Unlike 50, I do hope you practiced safe sex(?)

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:31 PM

49: As a HORNY CWT '05 NY corporate associate, I am happy to help out :)

58 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:32 PM

I find it distasteful that most of you would fantasize about committing buggery with a man that has trailblazed a path for others to follow in the legal profession. The irony of these statements lies in that in the real world, I am in more of a position to symbolically sodomize your careers and leave them to fester and wither away on the curbside. To me, you are all nothing but eunuchs on the way out.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:36 PM

55 - comment of the year. bukkake? hahahahaah

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:36 PM

I can't believe that there are 50+ comments without anyone pointing out that these Counsel may have a claim against Skadden if they were relying on the extra money from there salary to cruise Times Square for women of the night. I have to check but I think it may be Restatment 89 (or somewhere therabouts).

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:40 PM

Partner Emeritus, you are not in a position to do shit. ou are a 1L in a TTT school. suck a dick.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:41 PM

Frozen counsel salaries at Skadden? Sounds like somebody paid out too much in bonuses...

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:42 PM

I teabagged Partner Emeritus with my balls, he tried to get them both in his mouth at the same time. I remember that he had a real small cock.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:43 PM

PE: Just admit it, you get off on the abuse!

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:50 PM

I once had an anonymous sexual encounter with Partner Emeritus in the Times Square T.G.I. Friday's bathroom. He eyed me as I was urinating, so I followed him into the stall. I immediately dropped my pants and made him lick my grundle, after which I proceeded to sodomize him with my cock, the plunger, my fist, and a T.G.I. Friday's cocktail glass.

After the glass broke off in his ass, I ran out as fast as I could after punching him in the stomach and slapping his face with my still-erect cock. He never did mention he was of-counsel, but I could have guessed.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:52 PM

It's pretty pathetic that this is the firm Latham wishes it could be one day.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:54 PM

Partner Emeritus deep throated my 11 inch cock. I backhanded him after I finished, and then he beat off his tiny cock.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:55 PM

65-I bet PE then sued TGIF for the broken glass in his bum.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:59 PM

51 - I believe the correct phraseology would be:

Skaddenite here: Who put this dick on my back?

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:02 PM

69 (how apropo),
PE put his tiny dick on your back

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:07 PM

Dear Partner Emeritus, the world would be a better place if someone stuck a gun in your mouth and blew your f__king brains out. You are a complete A__HOLE.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:11 PM

C'mon now! PE is OLD SCHOOL! In his day, such unconscionable butt-fucking would NEVER be discussed so openly.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:23 PM

PE is the funniest cat that comments on these threads. And you all deserve his hybrid tough love package.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:25 PM

I wonder if Kash's ass lobster snaps at Eliie when he puts his dick on her back?

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:30 PM

According to some of these posts, PE has been getting an extra portion of "tough love."

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:37 PM

Did you know that when you're on the birth control pill, there is no medical need to have a period?

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:37 PM

Partner Emeritus,

In this downturn, are firms more likely to lay off associates or counsel? I think it's surprising that Kirkpatrick decided to terminate someone as experienced as Mark Levy even if he wasn't a rainmaker.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:56 PM

cadwalader sent out welcome packages to its incoming first years--start date remains october 5.

cwt to v5.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:56 PM

cadwalader sent out welcome packages to its incoming first years--start date remains october 5.

cwt to v5.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:57 PM

60 -- you're thinking of Restatement 90.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:03 PM

Justice Souter is retiring. This deserves a siren.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:08 PM


BREAKING NEWS: Justice David Souter plans to retire from Supreme Court, NBC News reports

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:08 PM

Amen 81. Lat goes on vaca and the whole site goes to shit.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:10 PM

Yup. Souter is saying peace out to the court. Here comes the first lesbian SCOTUS justice! With the new Dem supermajority, Obama can push through whoever he wants.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:11 PM

With Obama as President, that's not all that much news.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:12 PM

ELIE: WAKE UP

SOUTER RETIRED!!!

LAT IS GUNNA BE MAD!!!

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:14 PM

RESTATEMENT 90!!!!!!!!!!!

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:20 PM

ABC News reporting that Hillary Clinton will be nominated.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:24 PM

RESTATEMENT 90!!!!

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:25 PM

RESTATEMENT 90!!!!!!!!!!

90!!!!!!!!!!

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:26 PM

Justice Souter retiring: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103694193

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:35 PM

Hey Elie what the fuck happened to that Edificial website. Did that fold?

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:39 PM

MSNBC reports Obama will appoint Miranda from Sex in the City.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:21 PM

Counsel at Skadden make about $425-600K. Most are clustered right around $500K. A litte less in down years, a little more in good ones.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 12:03 AM

I'm deeply offended by the lewd nature of some of the comments here.

Why doesnt AbovetheLaw ban the IP addresses of people who leave these filthy comments?

Maybe it should report them to their law firms since many of them are clearly posting comments from their law firm computers. Isn't that grounds for disbarment?

As for the topic at hand why is a salary freeze news in this market? Because it isn't a salary REDUCTION?

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 12:03 AM

I'm deeply offended by the lewd nature of some of the comments here.

Why doesnt AbovetheLaw ban the IP addresses of people who leave these filthy comments?

Maybe it should report them to their law firms since many of them are clearly posting comments from their law firm computers. Isn't that grounds for disbarment?

As for the topic at hand why is a salary freeze news in this market? Because it isn't a salary REDUCTION?

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 12:19 AM

C'mon PE, you pompous ole rump wrangler. Weigh in here!

98 Posted by LaidOffDiary | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 1:33 AM

8: you shouldn't be scared. you should have already accepted the fact that you are a fungible and disposable monkey long ago. If you haven't, then you're a sucker. If your fear was measured by a guitar amp's volume, it would go to eleven.

Please tell me you've at least seen that movie.

www.laidoffdiary.wordpress.com

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 4:39 AM

Incoming Skadden associate. Heard about all of these freezes and economic environments.

Am I fail?

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 7:27 AM

You're all idiots.

-Skadden Sidebar

(maybe this will make it more likely I'll have a job to go back to?)

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 9:47 AM

8====D

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 10:00 AM

Skadden to Half-Skadden???? What's the world coming to???

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 11:48 AM

Incoming Skadden associate.

If you have to ask.....

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 1:38 PM

@102.

I'm half the firm I used to be...

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 3:06 PM

Partner Emeritus is the fucking man. A laugh riot of accurate firm insight, bolstered by decades of experience.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 1, 2009 6:46 PM

I'd like to know more about this Skadden "counsel" thing. Can one remain "counsel" permanently? It seems like a pretty good gig- get good work, make great money (though not partner money) but not have to bring in clients.

And is this type of position available at other firms? It does not appear to be at mine, which is more "up or out."

Assuming one does not make partner in Biglaw, is this "counsel" thing an option? Instead of going inhouse or going to government, is it possible to move from an "up or out" firm at year 8-10 to a firm like Skadden that does the "counsel" thing, and then just stay there forever working hard and doing good work?

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, May 6, 2009 1:38 PM

SkaTTTen blows--end of story.

Post Your Comment