Open Thread: 2010 U.S. News Law School Rankings (1-5)
Now that the new U.S. News rankings are out, we want to bring the strength of the full Above the Law community to bear on the discussion of the best law schools.
Every year, people warn prospective students against making decisions based solely on the rankings. To help students gather as much information as possible in case they do want to think about bucking the list and choosing a lower-ranked school, we’ll be posting a series of open threads around closely-ranked schools.
We hope the threads will help prospective students think about information that cannot be easily codified by sortable data, and will allow alumni to share the hard-earned & intimate knowledge of their schools that doesn’t come in brochures. For example, it’s rumored that students at this year’s #1 school have a tendency not to wipe the toilet seat.
Let’s start at the proverbial top. According to the rankings, the top five law schools in the nation are:
1. Yale
2. Harvard
3. Stanford
4. Columbia
5. NYU
We know we have readers that got into a number of these schools. Said readers, we invite you to share enlightenment in the comments about how you decided on which school to grace with your presence.
After the jump, we pull together some other things about the top five.
As one commenter said yesterday:
Go HLS! That “tie” was insulting.
There are a lot of Harvard Law students who were annoyed at being tied with Stanford last year. That probably tells you all you need to know about Harvard Law students.
Brain Leiter points out that the academic reputation of Yale and Harvard was identical, just 0.1 points ahead of Stanford.
What does 0.1 mean for your law school experience? One commenter felt this way:
The rankings should eliminate entirely opinions of academics. Who gives a s*** what another school’s professors think of your school? You want a job, so lawyers and judges are the only people whose opinions matter. Even business peoples’ opinions, or hell law students’ opinions matter more than do-nothing worthless academics.
It seems that this particular commenter is not a man of letters. There’s lots of dissent over how the rankings should be compiled. This led to the inclusion of part-time programs in the data set this year. We’re always happy to hear (and post) new criticisms.
We’re waiting for National Geographic to make another Eternal Enemies show, replacing lions and hyenas with Columbia and NYU students. Once again, Columbia came out on top in the official rankings. But, as Top-Law-Schools points out:
Perhaps more so than any other elite law school in the nation, NYU students can put forth a strong argument that their quality of life during law school is unmatched.
Frankly, have you ever met an NYU student who was unhappy with their choice? As every New Yorker knows, beyond visiting law firms in midtown, there’s no reason to ever travel north of 14th Street. While NYU kids enjoy the splendors of the Village, Columbia kids enjoy the splendors of Harlem Morningside Heights…
At least Columbia students have bragging rights, and perhaps about more than just their ranking. AmLaw reports that 140 of NYU’s 500 3Ls are looking at yearlong deferrals from their prospective Biglaw jobs. An unknown number have been deferred until at least January. Do you think Columbia students are doing any better?
What information do people need to know about the top five schools that are not included in the U.S. News law school rankings?
An Open Letter to Bob Morse of U.S. News [Brian Leiter’s Law School Reports]
NYU Latest to Help Deferred Students, Furloughed Alums [AmLaw Daily}
Earlier: U.S. News 2010 Law School Rankings




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
I'm firsty...
First? Doubt it
My school is better.
- Hofstra 2L
Yale if you want to teach.
Otherwise, Harvard.
NYU is a TTT
Stanford is like Yale and Harvard, but with better weather.
Mark my words, in five years it will be the #1 school - and will stay there for a very long time.
OH SHIT. THE CHICAGO TROLLS ARE GOING TO DOMINATE THIS
i predict an unprecedented level of anti-nyu trolling
I go to Penn. I got into Columbia, was waitlisted at Harvard and rejected at NYU.
Looking back, the only school on this list I would really consider over Penn is Harvard.
Are there seriously no layoffs, deferred start dates, salary cuts, or associate human sacrifices to discuss? Who cares about law schools?
UConn dropped out of the first tier down to 52, presumably because our evening division destroys our numbers.
Why does UConn even have an evening division? Do we really need it? Can we drop it and just admit more day students?
PSA: Chicago hasn't been ranked higher than 6th since 1998. GOI.
CLS to 190!!!
8 - WTF? Why didn't you go to Columbia?
6: dear "guest," i've marked your words in my journal
WHY ISN'T LATHAM HELPING ME?? All they do is send you to a god awful outplacement agency that's never worked with lawyers before.
*puts head in hands, cries uncontrollably, realizes there is only one way out*
-suicidal laid-off Latham 1st year
I didn't know people in California could read
After I got my LSAT scores, Columbia invited me to apply for free. I applied; I was rejected. (I didn't really care that much, because I had great offers from other schools, all with scholarships, which were totally better values for my money).
Did they think that I was a minority (being, oh, from Iowa) or were somehow otherwise increasing their "diversity" by inviting me to apply?
OR, were they just padding the number of applicants so that they had a lower acceptance rate, thus making their school seem more desirable and competitive in the rankings....
Hooray for NYU's ascendency.
If I went to Harvard, does that automatically give me the right of prima nocta to my secretary's ass?
15: oh hai, i see you're back today. were you busy yesterday?
i am waiting with breathless anticipation to see you outside the lipstick building on may 1 with a giant rat.
Of elite schools, Stanford unquestionably has the best quality of life during law school.
Law school rankings are one of the most humorous and ridiculous things about the law. They serve only to boost speculation and egos. In speaking with an editor of US News who worked extensively on the rankings and its methodology, he explained that outsie of the top 15 schools, the difference between school rankings was negligible at best and often can be chalked about a school policy or geographic location. He used the difference between American University and a prominent state school as an example and explained that AU's policy of not offering scholarships literally lowered their ranking by a few tenths of a point and resuklted in them being ranked 12 spots below the state school which offered a significant amount of scholarships.
Personally, i say who cares! If graduating from a top law school is the most significant accomplishment in your life or makes you feel like a greater person than you need to get a life.
LOL @ NYU
The Columbia Law experience is like a boob job. Expensive and painful, but you can't complain afterwards because you're happy with the results.
The best part about this list is that Chicago is not in it, and that that gets certain law professors' panties in a bunch.
Why is there so much discussion about ass pounding today?
Oceans rise,
Stanford falls,
Yale remains
I was going to go to NYU until I got a full scholarship to Yale. That was just enough to tilt my choice.
Thanks for this thread, Elie. As an HYS student I have absolutely no idea, and no desire to find out, how any of the schools are ordered outside of the top five. "Chicago" and "Michigan" sound like football teams, and until recently I thought that "UVA" was a variation on "VA" and referred to the Veteran's Administration.
The only school worse than Chicago is Texas.
This sounds about right. I only knew one person at Harvard who got into Yale but chose Harvard instead. And he was an idiot.
It's posts like these that make me disgusted to be part of the legal profession. When people who can't do basic math obsess over rankings, I find it more sad than comical. Law is one of the few professions where proxies are much more important than actual abilities.
Holy shit. NYU has 500 3L's? How many fucking transfers do they take?
22 went to a TTT
23: you can take the metaphor a little further:
painful and expensive, but Biglaw partners can't wait to get their hands on you.
(Oh, and everyone else easily recognizes that you're a whore).
Yale men like to pretend to be secretaries who have bosses from Harvard pound them in the ass.
Don't be afraid to give up a full-priced seat at one of these schools for a scholarship at a school in the 6-12 range. I turned down Harvard for a 6-digit scholarship at Northwestern, graduated with the job I wanted at a great firm in New York, and have very little debt. I couldn't be happier with my decision.
Stanford's fine if you want to stay in California and/or don't mind if people ask "that's a really good school, right?" when you say you went there.
Yale's fine if you think legal academia is cool (it's not).
Al the end of the day, "Harvard Law School" just has that special ring to it like no other school does. People don't write books or make movies about the Columbia or NYU law school experience.
Face facts. Harvard is it.
I think the order is:
1. Yale
2. Harvard
3. Stanford
4. Columbia
5. NYU
There, I said it.
9:
Please see http://www.jdjournal.com/ if you want that kind of info - it won't be published on ATL.
Something about Emory...
20: Amen to that. Finals/paper deadlines were stressful, but that's true everywhere. Great weather, ability to take classes in other departments pretty easily, mostly accessible professors, a relatively relaxed student body, and sweet facilities. I had a very good 3 years at SLS. If you're dead set on being an academic, I still think Y and H give you a better shot overall (although you can still do this from S), but for anything else, I'd say take the quality of life S has to offer trumps YH. Very glad I went to school there.
West Coast Guy
If you want to be happy in law school - with sunshine, professors who know you and like to teach you, small classes, students who get that law school isn't a zero sum game - go to Stanford.
If you want to enjoy law school with entirely impressive peers and you don't mind living in New Haven and the terrible weather, go to Yale.
If you're only interested in perceived prestige, don't mind being a number in a crowd, seek misery to the point that movies were made about the place and entire programs had to be implemented to improve "student life," go to Harvard.
Real Rankings
Yale
Harvard
Stanford
Columbia
NYU
Penn
UVA
Mich
Boalt
Duke
NW
Cornell
Georgetown
*** HUGE GAP ***
4th Tier:
Chicago
Texas
Go to one of these schools if you want a realistic shot at a job. Anything below these and your chances start to get dicey.
So
Yale = men who like to dress like secretaries
Harvard = men who pound those secretaries in the ass
NYU = men who film the above action with fervor
Something about Emory...
YATTTLE
HARTTTVARD
Duke RULZ!
New Haven = GHETTO
45: Wrong. All three = awkward, ugly, antisocial mouth-breathers who validate their pathetic existences with a largely meaningly ranking.
If you want to be a president or senator, go to Yale
If you want to get ANY law job, go to Harvard or Stanford
If you want to get ALMOST ANY job, go to Columbia
If you want to get ALMOST ANY job (while still enjoying your law school experience), go to NYU
43: Georgetown troll
You do realize that Georgetown's composite USNWR score is closer to USC than Cornell, right?
Go to one of these schools if you want a realistic shot at a job. Anything below these and your chances start to get dicey.
37: Rounders was presumably about NYU.
I went to YLS because it's #1 and because you didn't get in, BITCHES. Enjoy your TTT (e.g. Stanford) losers.
HLS grad here -- didn't apply to Yale because they had a 150 word limit for their application essay and I couldn't use the one I had prepared for all of my other applications.
the rankings should really just tell prospective students to run away as fast as possible. i'm a HYS student and i couldn't care less what order they're in. i have friends at the other two schools. the common thread? we all hate it. the end. at least it doesn't snow in california though. and hls is big enough that not everyone knows your business. those are two of the only real considerations a prospective student needs if they decide to take the plunge. it's all the same bs 1L classes anyway that teach you absolutely nothing about how to practice.
What is that old adage about pounding a secretary in the ass?
Why sould someone would choose Columbia over NYU?
It has a worse location. NYU has a better faculty, including the famous ones like dworkin, epstein, arthur miller, amsterdam. (Sure, they're all old.)
Columbia is Ivy league and attracts people who care about one spot on the rankings, which is a strange crowd.
28 - You're kind of dumb, huh?
28 - You're kind of dumb, huh?
YLS here. I'm just here. I'm just being not TTT. I wonder what being TTT is all about. Maybe someone from HLS can chime in and let me know. I bet its something like NOT getting an offer from Wacktel. Like I did 10 years ago. I'm a partner.
YLS here. I'm just here. I'm just being not TTT. I wonder what being TTT is all about. Maybe someone from HLS can chime in and let me know. I bet its something like NOT getting an offer from Wacktel. Like I did 10 years ago. I'm a partner.
*Awaits UChicago troll meltdown for being absent from the top 5 list*
DAMN HOMIE,
IN HIGSCHOOL YOU WAS THE MAN HOMIE
WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENE D TO YOU?
leiter's got a pretty good claim of promissory estoppel.. but i'm only a 1L, someone out there want to help me do the analysis?
flame bait
62 - are you serious!?
53 - Rounders was about NYLS. Or Pace.
62 - probably works at Latham or Skadden. In other words, EPIC FAIL!!!!
62 - probably works at Latham or Skadden. In other words, EPIC FAIL!!!!
@57 - wtf?
DAMN HOMIE,
IN HIGSCHOOL YOU WAS THE MAN HOMIE
WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENE D TO YOU?
51,
A. If somebody's putting for "real" rankings, it's to diverge from USNWR's calculations.
B. http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-law-schools/rankings
"Closer" how?
(13) Cornell: 78
(14) GULC: 75
(18) USC: 72.
- Not 43
@58: If by better location you mean hideously expensive shitty dorms and an immediate neighborhood overrun by drunk high schoolers from Jersey, then yes.
What is that old adage about pounding a secretary in the ass?
==============
Don't try it if you're a broke dick.
There is a big difference between YHS and CN
58, if you want to stay in NYC, NYU hands down.
If you want to go anywhere else in the country, CLS hands down.
We need to stop hating on Chicago and Texas, even IF Brian Leiter is a complete douchebag.
-NYU 3L
I got rejected from yale, waitlisted at harvard, got into columbia and nyu. (didn't apply to stanford, too far away) Visited columbia and nyu, columbia sucked, nyu was awesome. Had a great experience, didn't work too hard and got 10 job offers.
62,
If you're going to pretend to be a partner at Wachtell, you should probably make sure you spell it correctly.
58 - Chirelstein, Coffee, Greenberg, Gilson, Wu, Morrison, Witt, and last but not least, mothafuckin' Heller!
Not that classes really matter for practice, but CLS has a pretty money corporate law faculty
What the fuck should I do now?
-GW 1L
58 - the crowd at NYU is very strange also. With the relaxed people, there's also a very weird mix of hipsters, too cool for school kids, and gunners rejected from every other T5. Plus, I don't know many people who live in manhattan past 1L, and if they do, they have serious family $$$. Don't get me wrong, I like going to school here, but there's no need to oversell it.
NYU should be somewhere around 7-9. That's where they were 5-10 years ago. The reputation scores are lower than Chicago or Michigan. They are tied to a mediocre undergrad. There is no reason for them to be at #5.
unemployed NYU alum here: don't go to law school. anywhere. unless you can go for free. no one is safe.
What the fuck should I do now?
-GW 1L
@11 you should do what Brooklyn did and just pretend they don't exist.
My school is #61. I'm employed and have worked at a big law firm. So what's the difference?
Is a Harvard trained lawyer better because he went to Harvard, or because he was enough of a geek in college (i.e. didn't party like the rest of us) to get into Harvard in the first place (assuming it wasn't family connections, which helps many Harvard/Yalies get in). And such a person who studies while those around them are throwing up at frat parties is more likely to not balk at working big law associate hours.
Better lawyers? No. Just geeks.
Rounds wasn't about NYLS or Pace. No way one of those students would be considered for a prestigious clerkship.
My school is #61. I'm employed and have worked at a big law firm. So what's the difference?
Is a Harvard trained lawyer better because he went to Harvard, or because he was enough of a geek in college (i.e. didn't party like the rest of us) to get into Harvard in the first place (assuming it wasn't family connections, which helps many Harvard/Yalies get in). And such a person who studies while those around them are throwing up at frat parties is more likely to not balk at working big law associate hours.
Better lawyers? No. Just geeks.
90 - it was a summer judicial externship. Unclear if it was federal or state.
Definitely not a prestigious clerkship.
82 - the moneyest corporate law faculty, homeboy! Coffee, Gilson, Gordon, Goshen, Pistor et al.
79 - yeah I had a lot of offers too - work from home, from your computer, $500/wk. Deleted those bastards every time...
86: You should have opted to go to Columbia then. I bet none of their alums are unemployed. *rolls eyes*
WHO THE FUCK CARES IF A LAW SCHOOL IS TIED TO A MEDIOCRE/PRESTIGIOUS UNDERGRAD - ARE YOU GOING TAKING LAW CLASSES IN UNDERGRAD OR IN THE LAW SCHOOL - GEEZ PEOPLE
79 - yeah I had a lot of offers too - work from home, from your computer, $500/wk. Deleted those b@stards every time...
To tell you the truth, 10-15 years ago? NYU was a joke...Harvard was Harvard and Yale was for asian nerds or mid-class smarties...columbia was still then tough to get in....KING'S COLLEGE OF LAW....KING KING KING.
I got in through the very best practices of institutional racism. Being male, waspy-white, wealthy, and having a father who was an alumni.
Take that New Haven fire fighters.
Is anyone checking credentials on the this thread? Get 91 outta here, before he contaminates the rest of us with his fratty coolness.
My school is #61. I'm employed and have worked at a big law firm. So what's the difference?
Is a Harvard trained lawyer better because he went to Harvard, or because he was enough of a geek in college (i.e. didn't party like the rest of us) to get into Harvard in the first place (assuming it wasn't family connections, which helps many Harvard/Yalies get in). And such a person who studies while those around them are throwing up at frat parties is more likely to not balk at working big law associate hours.
Better lawyers? No. Just geeks.
Comment removed by moderator.
Does USN rank prep schools and preschools? I want to know how prestigious my education is.
Which is the best law school rivalry?
Harvard v. Yale (Battle for #1) or CLS v. NYU (Battle for NYC)?
I say CLS v. NYU because they are way more similar than HY, which makes for a more fierce rivalry.
My school is #61. I'm employed and have worked at a big law firm. So what's the difference?
Is a Harvard/Yale trained lawyer better because he went to Harvard/Yale, or because he was enough of a geek in college (i.e. didn't party like the rest of us) to get into Harvard/Yale in the first place (assuming it wasn't family connections, which helps many Harvard/Yalies get in). And such a person who studies while those around them are throwing up at frat parties is more likely to not balk at working big law associate hours.
Better lawyers? No. Just geeks.
My school is #61. I'm employed and have worked at a big law firm. So what's the difference?
Is a Harvard/Yale trained lawyer better because he went to Harvard/Yale, or because he was enough of a geek in college (i.e. didn't party like the rest of us) to get into Harvard/Yale in the first place (assuming it wasn't family connections, which helps many Harvard/Yalies get in). And such a person who studies while those around them are throwing up at frat parties is more likely to not balk at working big law associate hours.
Better lawyers? No. Just geeks.
WILSON SONSINI GETS ITS ASS KICKED AT TRIAL
MoFo Wins $36M in Trade Secrets Trial
The Recorder
April 22, 2009
A San Jose jury hit Luna Innovations for $36 million in damages . . . Tuesday, handing . . . Morrison & Foerster the victory.
MoFo's Arturo Gonzalez had squared off with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's Jamie DiBoise in the three-week trial. . . .
DiBoise warned jurors last week that Luna, . . . with a $20 million market cap, "would cease to exist" if they awarded the damages being sought.
Comment removed by moderator.
79 - yeah I had a lot of offers too - work from home, from your computer, $500/wk. Deleted those b@stards every time...
This post seems mostly pointless. If ATL's focus is associates and law students, why is it putting up content focused on a different constituency?
On the NYC law school choice:
Columbia students do seem to hold a very strong complex against NYU. They boast/brag that they got in NYU too, and that NYU students were on their waitlist. They go far enough as to create chants about both of these asserted facts (which cuts both ways, since there are many students who had the exact opposite admission success between the schools) at the yearly Dean's Cup basketball game.
I am being partial, as I attended NYU. But I truly believe that the students were happier and more well adjusted to their surroundings as a general matter. There will be numbers and prestige obsessed students at both institutions, but from my personal experience at NYU and discussions with colleagues & friends from Columbia, the situation is more evident there.
Meet students at each school. Talk to other admitted students at the admit days. You can tell a lot just by the content of their conversations, attitudes, and general demeanor. See where you feel more comfortable. There is a negligible prestige/job prospect difference in practice, and that is the truth. Base your decision on what really matters. I could have been wrong for all I know, but this is how I felt.
77- agreed.
I just wanted to add that the Columbia name also carries more weight internationally because of its ivy league status. Unfortunate, but true. If NYU had the same ivy league effect internationally AND offered as much money as CLS did, hands down NYU.
86 here. Ha, I'm not the person named, but that is definitely funny.
O.K. 105, we get it. Nobody cares about law schools after T10. Yale is clearly better in every way. That's why it's number 1. I will now take my better education and hotter (26 year old wife) to lunch now.
- Smarter Partner
O.K. 105, we get it. Nobody cares about law schools after T10. Yale is clearly better in every way. That's why it's number 1. I will now take my better education and hotter (26 year old wife) to lunch now.
- Smarter Partner
I think it's funny how NYU students, unable to actually argue that their school provides a better education or better career prospects, resort to claims that their school is "more fun," or "in a better neighborhood," or "has a bunch of old, white, male professors hired solely because they have 'big names' and not because they actually provide any value."
Full disclosure -- I got into both Columbia and NYU and chose Columbia. I was really turned off by what I viewed as some sort of huge inferiority complex displayed by every NYU student I met. I was also pretty skeptical that they'd have such inside knowledge about the "atmosphere" at a school they didn't go to and probably didn't get into.
Yes, there are people at Columbia because they got rejected from HYS--just like there are people at NYU who are there because they got rejected from HYSC. But most people I knew chose Columbia because it meets their needs a lot better than other schools.
Living in the village might sound cool, but why would I want to find overpriced dorm-like housing on my own in a neighborhood swarming with wannabe hipsters and the B&T crowd when Columbia would guarantee me spacious, subsidized, on campus housing a block from school and a couple blocks from the best parks in Manhattan?
And I really don't get this idea that . I did not go to NYU, and I am close to only a handful of NYU students. The experiences they describe about collegiality/competitiveness, classroom engagement, public interest opportunities, etc. do NOT describe a place better than Columbia (or even really that different). I'm really convinced that they make these claims only because of that inferiority complex I mentioned, and because they can cling to false believes about intangible things easier than hard facts.
I went to Blair Academy after I got kicked out of Lawrenceville.
81 - doesn't Chirelstein live in California now, with that new law school? I believe UC Irvine?
I went to Blair Academy after I got kicked out of Lawrenceville.
113 -- The question is why? I work with Harvard, Yale, Widener (tier 4), Rutgers and graduates of many other law schools. The only difference is those who went to a top 10 school like to bring it up. In real life, it means nothing as to the ability of the lawyer.
This post sucks. For those of you trying to decide between these 5 schools, you are set for life. Pick the city you'd most like to spend 3 years in.
Also, if you want to practice, don't go to Yale. They don't teach people how to be lawyers there.
98 "To tell you the truth, 10-15 years ago? NYU was a joke...Harvard was Harvard and Yale was for asian nerds or mid-class smarties...columbia was still then tough to get in....KING'S COLLEGE OF LAW....KING KING KING."
85 "NYU should be somewhere around 7-9. That's where they were 5-10 years ago. The reputation scores are lower than Chicago or Michigan. They are tied to a mediocre undergrad. There is no reason for them to be at #5."
NYU has been ranked in the top 6 for about ~20 years now.
Its reputation score is above Michigan's in one category and the same as it in another (which is likely a result of people voting who attended law school back when Michigan was arguably a top 3).
As far as 10-15 years ago, Scott Turow listed NYU as a top 10, I believe, in "1L" and that was written in - what? The early 70s?
Really, why make up facts that are easily checked?
In California, are they more amenable to permitting partners nail secretaries in the ass?
"We know we have readers that got into a number of these schools. Said readers, we invite you to share enlightenment in the comments about how you decided on which school to grace with your presence."
This makes an incorrect assumption. I was accepted to NYU and Columbia, and I went to University of Chicago, one of the 100s of schools not in the top 5. Why? Smaller classes, more contact with professors, and dorkier people.
By the way, I propose that University of Chicago permanently allow Berkeley a spot on the rankings ahead of it, under the condition that they fire and publicly humiliate John Yoo. Deal?
teaching is the way to go!
116 - basically nailed the reasons why i'll be attending Columbia in the fall over NYU. The insecurity of the NYU students I met was out of control, and the fact that they spent most of their time trying to sell me on not going to Columbia (instead of on choosing NYU) really turned me off. The Columbia students I met almost never mentioned NYU, and seemed far more secure in their law school choice.
teaching is the way to go!
Nothing like a law school thread to keep the kids busy all afternoon. Yawn.
118 - that's Chemerinsky. Chirelstein is the contracts and fed tax supplement author.
"We know we have readers that got into a number of these schools. Said readers, we invite you to share enlightenment in the comments about how you decided on which school to grace with your presence."
This makes an incorrect assumption. I was accepted to NYU and Columbia, and I went to University of Chicago, one of the 100s of schools not in the top 5. Why? Smaller classes, more contact with professors, and dorkier people.
By the way, I propose that University of Chicago permanently allow Berkeley a spot on the rankings ahead of it, under the condition that they fire and publicly humiliate John Yoo. Deal?
American comes in at #5 on US News’ ranking of International Law programs, ahead of Yale, Berkeley, Stanford, and Northwestern. If you want an interesting career with an international organization with travel and plenty of opportunities to pound some ass, then WCL all the way! If on the other hand you went to those other schools, and are now stuck in some biglaw hell where you can only feel that your money and time chasing prestige paid off through boasting on an internet blog, then good luck to you. I will drink a margarita in honor of your suffering as a victim of modern day slavery next time I am away at a conference.
Reason fro choosing one school over another: I got into two of the top 5. One of them sent me a nice welcome binder full of information. The other sent me another prospective student's wait list letter (I then had to call to find out my own status). His last name started with the same 3 letters as mine. I picked the school that knew how to properly address its envelopes and I never regretted my choice.
120 - You are ruining my ridiculous long lunch break. Now I can't fit in sex. But seriously, it's better because the people who have gone before, the people who are there now (in terms of students and professors), and what they go on to do. I get paid more, have a better life, and am overall a better man. Back to lunch and over-billing.
- Smarter Partner
It's a vicious battle of trust fund brats. Oh, gosh, NYU is like totally insecure.
These threads will be useless. It's just students trying to bash other schools.
Where in tarnation is U-T?
The Columbia/NYU flaming here is really remarkable.
I think the Y/H rivalry is less intense because students and alums of both schools are very comfortable in their respective school's accomplishments. Y is much, much more selective than H and will retain its position as the most prestigious school for the foreseeable future. It will always be a favorite for superstar applicants. H graduated the current President, SCOTUS Chief Justice, Solicitor General, and countless professors and partners at every prestigious firm in the country (and plenty of firms in other countries as well).
84- "58 - the crowd at NYU is very strange also. With the relaxed people, there's also a very weird mix of hipsters, too cool for school kids, and gunners rejected from every other T5. Plus, I don't know many people who live in manhattan past 1L . . ."
-
An overwhelming amount of students live in Mercer after 1L, a couple blocks away from the school--the idea that you're actually an NYU student, and yet don't know that, is ridiculous.
123, only male secretaries.
Is it still illegal in Texas to pound your secretary in the ass while visiting the Alamo?
Who cares. The schools are all full of uptight jackasses like the people who comment here. It doesn't make one bit of difference which of the top ones you go to. Your job prospects will depend more on your social skills.
Who cares about US News? When do the new VAULT rankings come out?
141 - That's what people say who can't get into a T-10 based on things like LSAT and GPA. You are wrong, and I have a better life to prove it.
- Smarter Partner
I also got into NYU and Columbia and chose Columbia...I did so because of my experience at the admitted students days...NYU kids were just kind of mean actually and so were all of the front desk people I talked to...it was really surreal after coming from UCLA undergrad where people are generally friendly. At Columbia I had the complete opposite experience with everyone being rather nice and easy to talk to. Im very glad that I picked Columbia over NYU.
I also chose Columbia over Stanford (and a generous scholarship there...Im sad about that part :*( )because of their connections to Asia. I knew that I eventually wanted to work in Asia and Columbia has excellent connections especially to Japan that are nonexistant at Stanford. There are also more opprotunities to study abroad in Asia at Columbia.
NYU is overrated, if they were in Chicago, they'd be ranked where Northwestern is.
Duke!!
Is it still illegal in Texas to pound your secretary in the ass while visiting the Alamo?
The only real question is how many years before Cardozo overtakes Fordham.
HERE IS WHY (some) PEOPLE THINK LAW SCHOOL RANKINGS ARE IMPORTANT:
For some incomprehensible reason, law schools treat undergraduate GPAs the same, whether they come from the Ivy League or some crappy state school (or worse, Tier 1 private schools like Tufts, where the applicant proved they tried to go Ivy but failed).
Thus, those that attended sub-par undergraduate schools but got decent grades at those schools because they were competing with idiots got to remake themselves by using their inflated GPAs to get into good law schools. They then pretend they have a pedigree because of the ranking of law school.
Those that went Ivy undergrad seldom get wrapped up in these discussions because we lack your pathetic insecurities.
Don't pretend like a member of the elite looks at: B.A.: UConn, J.D: NYU, and thinks you're one of us. You ain't.
I went to HLS after my father said "wtf is Yale?"
I have no doubt they have better job prospects, and they got p/f grading too. But I'm not doing too badly either.
149- what if they are BA: UConn, JD: NYU cum laude, and you aren't? Haha, fuckface.
- State school grad with T5 law school honors
recent columbia alum here
On CLS vs. NYU,
I think the inferiority/superiority complex, competitiveness and "atmosphere" arguments are a red herring. Both schools are big enough to have lots of huge d-bags and lots of great people. I wouldn't focus too much on talking to random students to get a sense of the law school culture. Just pick the good ones to associate with when you get there.
Both are about even for private sector job prospects, in New York and elsewhere in the US.
CLS has better offerings for corporate, securities, business law topics. NYU is better for public interest.
CLS is still better for getting clerkships. This is perhaps unfair and just a holdover based on the name and the ivy. It may be starting to even out, but for now CLS has the edge.
West Harlem / Morningside is a very pleasant place to live. It's cheaper. It's quieter. You get better housing for your money. And there's more green space in the neighborhood. The village has a better selection of things to do, but you can take advantage of that by just going out there. It's nice to not actually live in a place where you're surrounded by a zillion stupid undergrads and where a huge portion of the eating and drinking establishments are really annoying and childish bars.
I never seriously considered NYU over CLS at the time I was choosing. If I had to do it over, it would be a much closer choice but I'd still probably go with CLS.
Washington and Lee should be top 20.
Is it still illegal in Texas to pound your secretary in the ass while visiting the Alamo?
43 - awww, did you not get into Chicago?
There are tons of douchebags there, but no one questions that it's better than Berkley and NYU
151 -- That's exactly right.
I bet you're some middling associate at a big law firm barely making a couple hundred k. If you don't know that the real money is the guys that sat to my right and to my left at the Yale Club last night, then you probably don't realize what people say behind your back.
Here are the problems with NYU:
1. Too many LLMs. Where as other schools let 30 or 40 LLMs in, NYU lets 500 in. FIVE HUNDRED. Yes, 500 FOB Asians, Indians, Eastern Europeans and people from other dirty parts of the world roaming your halls. Think about that.
2. Too many gays/lesbians.
Good things about NYU:
1. The girls are pretty cute overall. I would say 1/3 are decent looking, which is a lot for a law school.
2. The location. It's one of the hippest areas in the world.
HLS Grad here. I agree with a previous commenter that the only reason I did not apply to YLS is the need for the additional essay. I don't think one is better than the other but they seem to serve different purposes: YLS is a finishing school for overachievers (i.e., Rhodes Scholars) that treat a law school degree as a graduate degree in liberal arts. YLS students are lawyers that want to be politicians or professors. HLS has it share of this type (mostly people that did not get into Yale) but most are drawn to the practice of law (i) because of a genuine desire to be a lawyer or (ii) the financial rewards of practicing law. HLS students are lawyers that want to be Supreme Court Justices or investment bankers.
I don't understand the rankings though they seem to favor schools with smaller classes. Given the way YLS faculty has been plundered by HLS, I struggle to see how YLS continues to hold on to its place at the top but for the size of its class. Watch out UC Irvine to #1 next year!
Let's face reality here.
Yale Law School has been, and always will be, the most elite law school in the world.
Historically, it's incredibly low faculty/student ratio, admissions selectivity, and the breadth of opportunities for its graduates to clerk or take public interest jobs, teaching positions or government/political appointments is unrivaled.
Harvard is a relative factory that pumps out 550 grads a year, versus Yale's 180.
Why does everyone in New Haven take it in the ass? Is that some prerequisite?
UVA2L
@159 -- You're clearly a Yale student or wannabe. Yale is a fine school, but it's hardly "unrivaled" in any way that counts.
149: most of the Ivies have insane grade inflation compared to "lesser" schools like Williams, Tufts or Bates. Ivies give everyone A's so that the students don't feel dejected, and continue their lives blithely unaware that they are the same as everyone else. Go read Pulitzer-wining author John Marquand's "H.M. Pulham, Esquire." It's all about a guy whose wife cheats on him, whose kids hate him, whose friends despise him, and whose sister is a drunk. He convinces himself that none of this is real because he went to Harvard and is rich, and bad things don 't happen to rich people. Ironically, John Marquand was editor of the Harvard Lampoon back in the day.
Yes, HLS plunders YLS for professors, not the other way around.
Yale makes you ugly.
I got into NYU and Columbia and chose NYU. I am a 3L.
The reason NYU kids rank on Columbia is not because of an inferiority complex but rather because both schools offer you the same benefits in terms of education and opportunities, but Columbia does have some distinct downsides:
1. The substantial population of public interest people (hippies) at NYU means that one can go through law school without being surrounded by socially awkward people all gunning for the same definition of success (working at a firm with as high a Vault rank as possible). I know a lot of people who do very well at NYU (top 10%) who are purposely choosing more "lifestyle-friendly" firms when they could easily work at a more "prestigious" firm.
2. Related to #1, at my firm over the summer (an exclusive one), the Columbia students were mostly socially awkward, cliquish, and arrogant, whereas the NYU kids were not.
3. Of the several CLS students I have met in other contexts almost all have immediately asked me (1) what firm I am working at and/or (2) if I read autoadmit. NYU students seldom talk about (1) and never mention (2).
4. Related to #3, there are many more posts about CLS gossip/grades on Autoadmit than about NYU, despite the fact that NYU is a larger school. This is because CLS students love to indulge in juvenile obnoxious dick-measuring contests much more than NYU students.
YLS is hardly unrivaled in "any way that counts"?
Among Yale Law School's most notable living alumni are former U. S. President Bill Clinton, Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, former High Court of Australia Justice Sir Daryl Dawson AC KBE CB QC, former U.N. ambassador John R. Bolton, former First Lady and former U.S. Senator from New York, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, U.S. Senators Joseph Lieberman and Arlen Specter, former National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley, Newark mayor Cory Booker, law professor Alan Dershowitz, televangelist Pat Robertson, actor/economist Ben Stein, and former Attorney General Michael Mukasey.
116 + 126 = Truth
"Since US News began ranking schools, Yale Law School has always held the #1 position, and for good reason: it is unanimously considered one of the preeminent centers of legal studies in the world, and while its closest rivals at Harvard and Stanford also offer formidable prestige and their own array of career opportunities, Yale Law has remained a distinctive institution in many ways."
-- www.Top-Law-Schools.com
The only thing that HLS plunders are the asses of secretaries.
149's point is simple.
Life does not start at 22. Your pedigree does not start at 22. Just because you convinced yourself that it does, doesn't mean anything.
You can make all the arguments you want about why a properly trained cat is a dog. You can send him to the best dog finishing schools, you can teach him how to fetch and hunt better than any dog.
But he's still a cat.
@159
Your list of unrivaled opportunities only illustrates that practicing law is not something that YLS students aspire to after school. Except for clerking, all of those "opportunities" are available without a J.D. YLS grads tend to be the people with the "BA, MA, D.Phil, Ph.D, MD and JD" after their name.
166,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Harvard_Law_School_alumni
A few quick points, and I acknowledge my bias is transparent:
(1) Before law school, people mention the fact that New Haven is awful compared to Boston, yet most YLS grads are remorseful that they have to leave, while most HLS grads are glad to be done. YLS is a pleasant experience, where law school really is what you make of it, and you won't have your post-graduation prospects predetermined once you get your first (or second) semester grades. Rarely will you meet a YLS grad who doesn't look back fondly on the experience.
(2) The counter that HLS folk will raise is that they get better training as lawyers. I'm wary of this, but even if it were so, it's not controversial to say that the playing field will be leveled pretty quickly once YLS grads spend a year or two in actual practice. If there were a systematic flaw in YLS's preparation of grads for practice, they wouldn't be as highly sought at firms, for government positions, or at public interest organizations. Sure, there's the occasional YLS grad who probably took no black letter courses or learned legal writing in the litigation sense, but they're probably quite competent at learning what needs to be learned.
(3) HLS has a better network. This is probably the most legitimate advantage of HLS over YLS, but the YLS credential is an inherent asset in job changes. If there's one sought-after legal position opening up, odds are there will be several HLS grads to choose from, but one or only a few YLS grads. Their scarcity, combined with the #1 "wow" factor, increases their novelty.
I do think, though, that the SLS and HLS grade change will level the playing field. I think it was a smart move by Kagan and Kramer.
152 basically nailed it, though I disagree with the neighborhood opinions. Not that it really matters - it's three years in two relatively nice (but different) Manhattan neighborhoods.
I don't know if CLS is better for clerkships. It's not a terribly impressive place for clerkships generally, considering its elite rating.
I think CLS has the nation's best corporate law faculty (by a long shot). It also does have a better reputation internationally when compared to NYU.
People should remember that if you want to do tax, you should have your head examined. Wait - no, you should go to NYU. I do think that most of the administrative and support infrastructure at NYU is significantly better than CLS.
They're both excellent schools, and anyone who gets into the whole "inferiority" debate needs to grow up.
171, those are just the grads who went into government/high profile jobs.
There are also thousands of incredibly successful YLS grads practicing law in private practice.
149, you, sir, are a dipshit. there are very intelligent and talented people at state schools. top to bottom, of course not; but at the top, the students equal the genius of "you" ivies. plus there is big ten football. not to mention, in my four years (that included a masters), i undoubtedly threw back more beers and pounded more pussy than you could dream of experiencing in a lifetime. now i sit upon the mantle of the elite right beside (perhaps ahead) of yourself. i hope you enjoyed your memories, i certainly did.
149-
Just tell them to look up the top partners in the V20. They'll notice that most of them are double-Ivy. Not single.
There's a reason for that.
Recent H grad here. It seems pretty clear that under Dean Kagan's stewardship, H has leapfrogged S in every relevant criterion. H snagged the top emerging legal talent (Sunstein, Feldman, Lessig), expanded its course offerings by a great degree, redesigned the 1L curriculum, improved its facilities, and finally scrapped letter grades. I have a number of friends at and recent grads of S, and apparently all that S has been doing during this period is working hard on its tan and website photo. There is not a single professor on the S faculty that can be characterized as THE brilliant legal thinker of his/her generation. The fact that the Obama administration grabbed something like a fifth of the HLS faculty is telling... not only about these professors' strengths, but also about H's preeminence in legal scholarship on public policy and regulation, the dominant legal specialty of today and the next decade. The only thing that keeps S in the top 3 is its low class size. And while that measure does achieve its intended goal of creating an appearance of exclusivity, it's hardly a substitue for genuine quality. It would've been nice to have gone to H with only half as many people, but the trade off of having classes and seminars on nearly every topic imaginable was worth it.
Oh, @50, I have nothing against Y or its USNWR rank, but do you really want to say that Y, as opposed to H, is the breeding ground for future politicians, including the president? I mean, really? Been alive lately (since January 2009)? I sincerely hope you were being facetious.
Follow-up to 149 re: grade inflation. Here are two articles you may want to brush up on:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/2002/02/08/edtwof2.htm
- 1966: 22% of Harvard undergrads received A's
- 1996: 46% of Harvard students received A's
http://www.gradeinflation.com/
- chart 1/3 down the page showing changes in grade inflation over the decades. The four worst offenders? Harvard, Yale, Darmouth, and Duke.
So, the reality is that the Ivies stack the deck against everyone else by having limp-dick academic standards. When I graduated from Bates, I believe 18% of my class had an A average. That is not because Bates students are (all) retarded. It is because there is actual rigor in the grading standards. So we get slaughtered in the job and graduate school competitions. 149's assumptions are completely backwards.
I got into Harvard, Stanford, Columbia and NYU (didn't apply to Yale) and I'm going to Berkeley. Because the students are that much cooler.
I don't dispute that HLS has tons of notable alumni. However, when you pump out 550+ grads a year, you're simply going to have more lawyers to point at than will a smaller, more elite institution that pumps out 180.
HLS students don't even know what laches means.
I got into Harvard, Stanford, Columbia and NYU (didn't apply to Yale) and I'm going to Berkeley. Because the students are that much cooler.
Someone with an acceptance letter from Yale Law School, but a Harvard Law diploma, is an idiot.
149, you, sir, are a dipshit. there are very intelligent and talented people at state schools. top to bottom, of course not; but at the top, the students equal the genius of "you" ivies. plus there is big ten football. not to mention, in my four years (that included a masters), i undoubtedly threw back more beers and pounded more pussy than you could dream of experiencing in a lifetime. now i sit upon the mantle of the elite right beside (perhaps ahead) of yourself. i hope you enjoyed your memories, i certainly did.
I got into Harvard, Stanford, Columbia and NYU (didn't apply to Yale) and I'm going to Berkeley. Because the students are that much cooler.
176 -- It's a pleasure to read posts by a sweet dude like yourself who considers the number of beers he "threw back" in law school a bragging point. I'm glad that people like you are few and far between in the T5. We drink beer too--we just don't brag about it.
I wonder if Obama got dinged at YLS.
Why don't they offer a class on how to pound your secretary in the ass without pulling a hammy?
55, if that's true, it was a stupid decision.
-30
176-
1) Most Ivy's are in/near cities. There's plenty of drinking/pussy for all.
2) Keep telling yourself that your "peers" don't think less of you when your back is turned.
What's bizarre is that people that went to good law schools think they are more impressive than people that went to lesser law schools. Why wouldn't the same old true for those that went to better undergrads?
Consistency of logic dictates that if you went to an average undergrad but good law school, you'll be looked down on by those of us that went to good undergrads and good law schools.
" I was also pretty skeptical that they'd have such inside knowledge about the "atmosphere" at a school they didn't go to and probably didn't get into.
Yes, there are people at Columbia because they got rejected from HYS--just like there are people at NYU who are there because they got rejected from HYSC. But most people I knew chose Columbia because it meets their needs a lot better than other schools. "
"1. Too many LLMs. Where as other schools let 30 or 40 LLMs in, NYU lets 500 in. FIVE HUNDRED. Yes, 500 FOB Asians, Indians, Eastern Europeans and people from other dirty parts of the world roaming your halls. Think about that.
2. Too many gays/lesbians. "
i was admitted to both. i chose NYU because Columbia had a lot of people like this. i was also turned off by people using the word "ivy" over and over again.
nyu has douchebags too, but i think the proportions are different.
@186 - Your decision evidences a lot of naivety about the world. I guess it's true that a very high LSAT score certainly doesn't mean intelligence!
I hope that the impression of "coolness" that you got from glossy brochures sticks with you, giving you years of happiness as you suffer the same sort of people that populate every law school, including Berkeley.
Here's reality:
Going to a top law school makes you a better lawyer about as much as playing on the Yankees makes you a great baseball player.
You know who I hate are those NYLS kids. Am I right?
NYU is the Fried Frank of Top 5 law schools
I got into Yale and didn't even apply there.
Chuck Norris
In response to 165's misperceptions:
1. NYU doesn't have a "substantial" population of public interest students. The vast majority of NYU grads go immediately to work for a big law firm, just like at CLS. Yes, there are maybe a couple dozen more public interest students at NYU, but they are no bigger a presence there than at CLS. The public interest community at CLS is very apparent, very well respected within the school, and very strong and positive.
2. I can't comment on your anecdotal experiences about a handful of Columbia students, except to note that at any big school there will be a range of people. I know NYU students that are cool and NYU students that are awkward dorks--the same is true of CLS students. I will say that I've met more "fratty" NYU students than CLS students. Again, total anecdotal experience though.
3. I go to CLS and have very seldom heard about AutoAdmit. Again, your small anecdotal sample seems very unrepresentative.
4. I'm a CLS student and (unlike you, the NYU student), I do not browse AutoAdmit. So I can't really comment on the number of posts there from CLS vs. NYU students. Again, just because one or two prolific posters go to CLS does not really tell you much about the school.
When I was deciding on a law school, NYU offered me much better financial aid than Columbia, although I liked Columbia better. It was going to be a difficult decision until I realized, after going out for drinks with students, that living on financial aid in NYC would be hell, and decided to go to UVa instead. I had three of the best years of my life (never once feeling left out socially because I was living solely on fin aid) and after graduation went to a V10 firm in NYC.
Moral: Only pay attention to the NYU v. Columbia debate if you have enough $$ to go out in NYC at least twice a week while in law school, or you already have a strong network of relatively poor friends in the city. Otherwise, three years of beer and softball in Charlottesville is a much better option. You'll enjoy NYC a lot more once you are employed.
next topic: tastes great, or less filling? let the scintillating commentary continue!
Getting into a T5 now is like winning a free ticket for the most lavish cabin on the Titanic. You'll enjoy the ride a lot more even though you'll ultimately end up in the same place.
Eh. Anyone who went to Ivy League undergrad and got good grades went straight into finance and is retiring around the time their counterparts are getting screamed at by a senior associate that went U.Conn-NYU for putting a comma in the wrong place in a 1,000 page document.
Making the low salary of a big firm lawyer is the penance for those that partied their way through Ivy undergrad, or the "reward" for those that got fantastic grades at a state-school. The numbers add up to the same, but we all know the difference.
184 is right. In a hierarchical profession like the law, it is just stupid not to go to YLS if given the opportunity to do so.
A couple of points:
1) the majority of you are completely clueless but have deluded yourself into thinking otherwise.
2) a number of you are arrogant pricks who know deep down inside that the ivy undergrad and/or law school degree really hasn't made anyone think you're NOT a prick but have still deluded yourselves into thinking that it has.
3) Law schools all teach the same crap, and don't prepare you for the practice of law. Unfortunately brands do matter but not as much as the people on this silly board think, and particularly not a few years out.
4) I'll never forget the Harvard 1L I was interviewing who said she was on law review (another useless activity I might add) and was an editor and after I said "my god, an editor as a 1L?" and she pointed out "everyone who is on harvard's law review gets the title of editor." Oh Harvard, is grade inflation not enough? why don't you just start calling your JD a PhD?
All the people on this board arguing about which law school is better....well you're the eggheads that law school rankings were made for.
152 and 175 are the only responses worth reading about the NYU vs Columbia debate. If you don't know if you want to clerk, do public interest, go into tax or corporate, just pick your neighborhood. I preferred downtown. I was very happy at NYU. Some people I know preferred uptown. They were very happy at Columbia. We all have jobs. The end.
UVA = GULC's asshole
199 - Truth. Coming back in town for Foxfields?
"I think it's funny how NYU students, unable to actually argue that their school provides a better education or better career prospects, resort to claims that their school is "more fun," or "in a better neighborhood," or "has a bunch of old, white, male professors hired solely because they have 'big names' and not because they actually provide any value."
Full disclosure -- I got into both Columbia and NYU and chose Columbia. I was really turned off by what I viewed as some sort of huge inferiority complex displayed by every NYU student I met. I was also pretty skeptical that they'd have such inside knowledge about the "atmosphere" at a school they didn't go to and probably didn't get into."
__________________________________________
The complex you describe cuts both ways. A superiority complex is often times just a veil for deep-seeded insecurities. And, If as one of the previous posters describes, CLS students make up waitlist chants about NYU students (at Dean's Cup?), then it's hard to believe that people at Columbia are as secure as you seem to imply that they are. The reality is that both the dean at NYU and the dean at CLS claim that a third of the class at each school was waitlisted at the other. I know plenty of people at NYU who were wailisted at CLS, but I also know a good deal of people at Columbia who were waitlisted at NYU. In any event, trying to argue that a school is more prestigious than another because people from the latter were waitlisted at the former doesn't actually make much sense. Columbia has a habit of waitlisting a bunch of people who get into Harvard (I know a few of those too)...and I'm sure no one, including you, will argue that that somehow means that those people were not as qualified as the ones who got in...or worst yet, that Columbia is more prestigious than Harvard.
As for your claim about professors. I'm not sure any school can make a claim that they hire professors because of the value they will add to their students' education--there's just no good proxy for that kind of conclusion to be drawn. If anything the overall poaching practices of the top schools seems to suggest that "big names" do matter. And Columbia hasn't exactly taken a different approach: it has tried and continues to try to hire big names away from other top schools. The problem is that they haven't been as successful and it's starting to show. See e.g. http://www.leiterrankings.com/faculty/2008faculty_impact.shtml
Columbia used to do much better in faculty impact, but it has lost many faculty to other schools and has failed to steal professors of the same quality at the same rate that it's losing them
196, terrible analogy. if anything, NYU is Skadden/Weil. it's not Wachtell (although founded by NYU grads) or Cravath (although run by NYU grad); it is a large, relatively new and fast-rising LS, just outside the top in terms of prestige, where the biggest swinging dicks choose to educate themselves.
165: i go to nyu, and while i've never heard the words autoadmit spoken by a student, most people do ask each other which firms they're working for. i would imagine that's probably common at most of the T10s.
i think both schools are fine, and in real life when i nyu or columbia students who i know from before law school or at my firm, the subject of schools or rivalry never ever come up. not once in my 3 years here.
i hope outside students don't get the impression that this rivalry occurs much in the "real" world and nyu and columbia students are really so childish. it's just a bunch of insecure internet trolls who are either nerds or are procrastinating for finals.
Hofstra is in Hempstead and is not a T-14.
Turned down Yale and Harvard (dinged at Stanford and Chicago) for NYU. Go VIOLETS! No regrets. Kaye Scholer to 190!!!!!!!!
149 is right on
151 - I think 149's comment hit a little close to home didnt it
@116:: You may be the dumbest person on this entire thread.
Your whole point of posting was that you chose Columbia over NYU because NYU students seem to cling to intangibles and talk about how fun they neighborhood is and therefore you perceived that as an inferiority complex. You then go on to argue that the village isn't all that great anyway. (Who has the inferiority complex?)
You can't argue that you chose one school over another because the other student body clings to intangibles while admitting that your choice was based on the "inferiority complex" of the other.
149 is right on
151 - I think 149's comment hit a little close to home didnt it
"they" = "their"
at least it's a typo and not a flaw in logic
-214
Surprising to see the New York Law School ranked that high.
Students at Columbia seem so miserable. It's like the school wants to maintain an old-school, hazing-like experience of law students. 1Ls do classes 100% of the time - no volunteer clinics, no clubs or law reviews, nothing other than studying and being competitive with each other. Go somewhere else for your own good.
Students at Columbia seem so miserable. It's like the school wants to maintain an old-school, hazing-like experience of law students. 1Ls do classes 100% of the time - no volunteer clinics, no clubs or law reviews, nothing other than studying and being competitive with each other. Go somewhere else for your own good.
@215: They should start printing undergrad Ivy League degrees on toilet paper so at least that way they will be useful.
220-
If you haven't seen an IVY undergrad around it's because they all went into Finance/Consulting/Business. This is where real money is made.
If you think making $280k/year is being rich, you should ask somebody what real money is and how it's made.
Why isn't U Richmond ranked higher?
149, 156: What's so cute is the fact that you think money buys you respect in all circles. It doesn't. It can't mask a middling IQ, despite your efforts to obscure your own intellectual inferiority with an "elite" label.
Don't pretend like a member of the [real] elite looks at: J.D: NYU (or Yale) and thinks you're one of us. You ain't. Sadly for you, money cannot buy you the one thing you desire the most: respect from those who popped out of the womb more gifted than you.
- Not 151
223-
Way to beat up on a straw man. In my experience, with a few notable exceptions, most people with Ivy degrees are pretty smart. Unless they backdoored their way into their schools, they had to demonstrate strong intelligence to get in. You've really met a lot of stupid people with Ivy degrees?? I severely doubt that.
Money is just the cherry on top.
How does my ass taste, NYU?
I will be going to a V10 firm, unlike just about all of you fools.
- CLS 2L Stud
43 is right on the money
221: The must teach tangential logic at business school.
223-
Wouldn't those that "popped out of the womb gifted" be those that demonstrated success throughout their lives, not those that jumped in late in life and pretended like what happened earlier didn't count?
I think you are arguing against yourself.
-Not 224
How is Washington and Lee not still in the top 25?
Over 70% of Washington and Lee 2L's got biglaw this year ... can't say the same for UNC/Indiana/Iowa/Minnesota/Emory <-yuck
"Hey hey NYU, we got into your school too!"
-CLS cheer at Dean's Cup (We were ROBBED this year at the game. Stupid ref!)
CLS vs. NYU is just a matter of personal preference. CLS has a gorgeous campus, still easy to get dtown but without being in the middle of the Village constantly, and free of all those damn hipsters.
"Hey hey NYU, we got into your school too!"
-CLS cheer at Dean's Cup (We were ROBBED this year at the game. Stupid ref!)
CLS vs. NYU is just a matter of personal preference. CLS has a gorgeous campus, still easy to get dtown but without being in the middle of the Village constantly, and free of all those damn hipsters.
Everyone in the profession knows the best doc reviewers come from HLS.
i went to a state school and then HYS. people definitely did look down on me somewhat, but that's just how all the princeton and harvard kids roll. either way, i figured out pretty quickly that it takes a lot more life skill to put yourself at the top of a school with 50,000 students than to get a 4.0 at an ivy. a lot of the ivy kids ended up being pretty useless anyway.
225 = the face of the concerted effort to get all CLS SAs no-offered this summer.
"Hey hey NYU, we got into your school too!"
-CLS cheer at Dean's Cup (We were ROBBED this year at the game. Stupid ref!)
CLS vs. NYU is just a matter of personal preference. CLS has a gorgeous campus, still easy to get dtown but without being in the middle of the Village constantly, and free of all those damn hipsters.
151/223
Your repeated use of the word "Ain't" betrays the strong possibility of both being the same poster and not being the "double ivy" elite you claim to be.
I'm thinking Emory, or maybe Vandy, or possibly even Alabama.
233-
You realize that clients think the same way as the Ivy kids at your school, don't you?
That's the point. Not that Ivy's are more talented, but that the perception of them as such makes them more successful.
The same argument is made everyday: "Brooklyn law grads are as good lawyers as CLS grads." That may be so, but the Clients treat them differently.
How can you possibly think differentiation amongst law schools exists but differentiation amongst undergrads doesn't?
Why even have undergrad? Why not go straight from high school to law school?
This whole argument is a farce.
CLS is pretty social, despite what some people think. There are tons of clubs, journals, bar reviews, etc. Really no diff than other law schools.
233-
You realize that clients think the same way as the Ivy kids at your school, don't you?
That's the point. Not that Ivy's are more talented, but that the perception of them as such makes them more successful.
The same argument is made everyday: "Brooklyn law grads are as good lawyers as CLS grads." That may be so, but the Clients treat them differently.
How can you possibly think differentiation amongst law schools exists but differentiation amongst undergrads doesn't?
Why even have undergrad? Why not go straight from high school to law school?
This whole argument is a farce.
where is charlotte law school ranked? I didn't see them in the top 25.
I went to Columbia a while ago. Truly loved (most of) the experience. The only thing I remember about an NYU "rivalry" is thinking it odd that NYU students supposedly thought they were hip - where I come from, a hip law student is an oxymoron.
Much more annoying were the gunners who didn't get into Harvard or Yale, so they walked around with chips on their shoulders for three long years (and I bet they still have them). And then there was Aaron Charney...
236-
I personally think the use of "ain't" in that context was used because it is funny to mock someone else's intelligence then purposefully use bad English.
Nice to see that we at least agree that an Emory degree is a sign of a lesser mind.
-Not 223
239: The next time you have a legal problem, why don't you just let an Ivy League undergrad handle it for you.
who cares what school you went to, all that matters is rainmaking ability. no school can test the ability to make a client want to give you several million dollars just for asking.
233 - Has that really been your experience? I went from a not-particularly-prestigious small liberal arts college to HLS and I felt pretty comfortable there. Felt good about how I measured up to my classmates from HYP undergrad, graduated somewhere in the top third. Never felt like people thought less of me because of my undergrad.
CLS v. NYU
There are some prestige/name recognition points to CLS outside of law and maybe for clerking. But on the fringes, and unless you plan on making it to SCOTUS level where this type of minute difference might matter, there is no career prospect difference that you, as a student, will be able to discern.
So visiting the schools and gut feeling is really all you have to go on. Faculties are both great. NYU has made great recent strides to obtain some very distinguished and talented professors (moreso than Columbia), but Columbia has great professors themselves. And as a previous post mentioned, that might not even really impact the classroom experience itself.
It may cheapen the significance of the decision, but in the end the real difference is (gulp) location and facilities. Otherwise I doubt you'll be able to pointedly stake out any real lasting differences that favor one over the other by much, if any at all.
End of the day, if you got into one or both, you are sitting pretty.
It's good to see Columbia ahead of NYU. That wannabe ivy is an overrated joke.
I have nothing substantive to post other than I love the random Chocker sighting @ 86 on ATL!
I have nothing substantive to post other than I love the random Chocker sighting @ 86 on ATL!
Articles like this tend to bring out comments based more on testosterone than on thought.
The similarities between the schools ranked in USNWR's top 5 may be of greater importance than the differences. They all have exceptionally well qualified students and faculty, strong academic and clinical programs, respected law journals, and excellent libraries, IT systems and other facilities. Each of these schools has produced highly distinguished alumni. Those who attend or have graduated from any one of these have good reasons to take pride in their schools.
Those things having been said, there are differences between these schools that, even setting aside perceptions about relative status, may be important to people trying to decide which to attend. These differences may have more to do with values and atmosphere than they do with quality. What follows is a highly subjective individual take on these differences, which will probably attract responses generating more heat than light.
Yale is a relatively small school (each year's class has only about 200 students). The student body is exceptionally well qualified, highly diverse, and tends to be interested in the law not just as a means of making a good income or acquiring influence, but as an endeavor that warrants intellectual inquiry on an interdisciplinary basis. Yale students are exceptionally highly capable -- it's the kind of place where someone with an LSAT score of 175 and an undergraduate GPA of 3.9 at an Ivy League school can still feel intimidated by the intellectual caliber of some of the other students. They nonetheless tend to be at least as much interested in inquiry and teamwork as they are in competition. New Haven may not be in sunny California, but Yale students are more interested in the quality of intellectual life than they are in climate.
It is fairly telling that, of those students offered admission by Yale and one or more of the other schools in the top 5, the great majority choose to enroll at Yale over any of those other schools.
Yale Law's alumni include U.S. Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, and the late U.S. Supreme Court Justices Byron White and Potter Stewart, among others.
An exceptionally large portion of Yale's graduates, in some years more than 40 percent, clerk for federal judges following graduation. The majority of Yale graduates end up pursuing careers in private sector law firms, mostly large corporate firms. The notion that Yale is just a hothouse for future academics is misleading. Only a small portion of Yale graduates, roughly 4 percent of each graduating class, end up pursuing academic careers. Those that do are well qualified, sought after, and represent a disproportionate number of faculty at top law schools nationwide, and their talent is such that they draw more than their share of attention as academics, but the actual number of number of Yale graduates who pursue such careers is quite small.
Harvard is a larger school, enrolling about 550 students in each entering class. Harvard unquestionably has a strong faculty and well qualified student body, but it is perceived by many to have a markedly different atmosphere and quality of life than Yale. It has a long tradition, reaching back more than a century, of taking a highly competitive, somewhat Darwinian approach to legal education, motivating students by pitting them against each other in a fiercely competitive environment intended to produce litigators more than any other type of lawyer. While Harvard Law students are all highly intelligent as individuals, and are highly accomplished in the worlds of government and business, when considered as a group they tend not to display as much interest in the intellectual aspects of law as students at Yale.
Harvard Law alumni include President Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court Justices Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Stephen Breyer and Antonin Scalia, U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan, and the late U.S. Supreme Court Justices William Brennan and Harry Blackmun, among others.
Harvard Law graduates tend to pursue careers in corporate law, to gravitate toward litigation as opposed to other specialties, and to focus primarily on winning more cases and making more money than anybody else. Roughly 20 percent of Harvard graduates obtain judicial clerkships after law school. In proportional terms, that is only about half the percentage of the graduating class that earn clerkship appointments at Yale, but since Harvard graduates more than twice as many students each year, there are probably a somewhat larger total number of Harvard graduates than of Yale graduates clerking for federal judges.
For many years, Harvard has had a reputation as having a miserable, dog-eat-dog quality of life due to its focus on competition as a means of motivating students. In recent years, Elana Kagan, who was Dean from 2003 to 2009, is reputed to have made significant progress in improving the quality of life for Harvard Law students. Since she resigned to become the Solicitor General of the US last month, Howell Jackson has been named acting Dean. It will be interesting to see whether he and his successors as Dean will continue the efforts she made in this regard.
Stanford is clearly an excellent law school. On the order of 25 percent of Stanford graduates win judicial clerkships each year, a higher percentage than Harvard. As the premier law school on the West Coast, located in close proximity to Silicon Valley, Stanford has considerable strengths in the field of intellectual property law, and provides more than its share of counsel for the technology sector of the U.S. economy, and of lawyers in the West Coast offices of major corporate law firms. Of the top 5 law schools, Stanford's Palo Alto campus has the most pleasant climate and physical surroundings -- although students there probably spend so much time working that they don't have many opportunities to enjoy the ambience.
Stanford Law graduates include Sandra Day O'Connor, the first female Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, and the late U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist.
Columbia Law has, over time, played a key role in the world of corporate law. Many of the best known corporate law firms in New York were founded by Columbia Law graduates, including Sullivan & Cromwell, Cravath Swaine & Moore, Shearman & Sterling, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, Weil Gotshal & Manges, and Proskauer Rose, among others. Columbia has a reputation as a school oriented primarily toward corporate law. It has strengths in a number of other areas, however, notably including international human rights law.
Columbia Law alumni include U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader (who taught at Columbia Law earlier in her career), and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. In earlier years, Columbia Law alumni included the late U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, and U.S. Supreme Court Justices Benjamin Cardozo, Harlan Fiske Stone, Stanley Reed and William O. Douglas.
NYU Law has been known for decades as having the strongest tax law program of any law school in the U.S., bar none. NYU Law has pursued an intensive program of fund raising and faculty recruiting over the past several decades in a systematic effort to strengthen the quality of the faculty, student body and facilities, and the results show in the school's ranking. NYU is now viewed as a fairly close rival to Columbia. (Some NYU partisans view the school as superior to Columbia, but that view is not widely shared by others.)
Prominent NYU Law alumni have included Nobel Peace Prize recipients Elihu Root and Mohamed ElBaradei; Judith Kaye, former Chief Judge of the New York State Court of Appeals, and Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; former FBI Director Loius Freeh; former New York City mayors Fiorello LaGuardia, Ed Koch and Rudy Giuliani; and the founders of New York law firm Wachtell Rosen Lipton & Katz.
As between these five schools, Yale probably has the highest admission standards and is the hardest to get into. Harvard, Stanford, Columbia and NYU also have exceptionally high standards, however, and students and alumni of any one of these five schools deserve respect for their abilities. Each one of the schools can boast of distinguished alumni, and of significant impact upon our country's judicial and other governmental institutions and upon the private sector legal world. There are sufficiently marked differences between the institutional personalities of the individual schools to make for some tough choices for those admitted to more than one of them.
243-
I do. They have to be double Ivy. Because I expect the best and I'm willing to pay for it.
204, either the 1L you interviewed was lying or you are. There are no 1Ls on the Harvard Law Review.
246, that's a pretty measured commentary on the whole cls v. nyu rivalry and generally I agree with you (I'm a CLS alum). but, I've got to say that there is one HUGE difference though. I spent a couple of years after law school practicing in a number of cities in East Asia and you would be amazed how the Ivy brand name would just magically open doors for you. You would not be able to use an NYU law degree as your calling card the same way you would with a Columbia degree. So, all else being equal, if you are contemplating any sort of cross-border/international legal career, CLS is the way to go.
Lots of CLS students defending their choice to live in the doldrums. Hope you enjoy that miserable looking law school building.
- T-14 student
I have no horse in this race, so can someone from CLS or NYU explain to me this inferiority complex bit?
I see a lot of beating up on NYU, which probably doesn't come from NYU people. So are these Chicago / UCLA people beating up on NYU, or are they Columbia students who have an inferiority complex, or are NYU students anonymously beating up on NYU to confuse me?
In the interests of full disclosure: I have hired NYU and CLS students in the past, and they both do a great job.
Could someone define "TTT"? Not all of us are hip on the ATL lingo.
@ 252 - Most people interview for jobs during their 1L summer, after journal offers go out but before the 2L year starts. 204 was obviously talking about such an interviewee. He made a poor choice of terminology, but the point is valid.
CLS is way more selective than NYU, and UC Irvine is more selective than either. So it'll be sweet to see it when next year the top rankings go:
1.) UC Irvine
2.) Yale
3.) Stanford
4.) Harvard
5.) Columbia
6.) NYU
and we see all the Ivy types suddenly arguing against selectivity as a basis for ranking and we see the NYU types suddenly arguing for the importance of historical prestige.
high school zero = harvard hero
In fairness, NYU students and CLS students more or less cheer the same things at the Deans' Cup game. In fact, most of the cheers I've heard CLS using are recycled from what NYU was cheering last year when they snuck into fourth place for a year. It's not really evidence of some deeply held insecurity, just more of a cheering on your team during the game sort of thing.
high school zero = harvard hero
All top law schools are one extended family:
Imagine HYS as siblings in one nuclear family. Its the family that everyone looks up to and holds their kids up to. Yale is clearly the highest achieving sibling but everyone in the other families still envies all of them. NYU and CLS are twins in another family. They are the cousins who are incredibly respected by the other cousins but still have major inferiority complexes at times. This is particular to CLS. CLS is especially insecure because it used to be common thought that he clearly had more talent than NYU. Now NYU has begun to hit its stride and CLS routinely freaks out. Whenever CLS beats NYU on a math test, or scores 2 extra points in a basketball game; he calls up his cousins at HYS to tell them how good he is and then writes about it in his diary. As NYU gets more talented he begins to get really defensive too and he and CLS just nit pick each other; bringing both schools down in the eyes of everyone else. Chicago is pissed because it was disowned first from HYS family and then from NYU and CLS' family after it had a rough patch in its life and hates hanging out with Boalt and Penn. It routinely tries to go over the top of all of them by trying to hang out with HYS, but they just ignore him and make him do shit for them. Also GW died this year.
230: It's a statistical impossibility that every CLS student got into NYU, or that no NYU student got into CLS. Call me biased, but NYU has a harder time of it due to the difficulty of recruiting a higher number of high LSAT scores. Obviously this argument works against Yale as compared with Harvard. :) Not that I'm saying Harvard is better than Yale: it's just that I know several students who got into Yale and are here at Harvard, and I have several friends who got into Harvard, NYU, and Columbia who are at NYU. So it's really one bit incestuous pot.
-Harvard 2L
high school zero = harvard hero
*big
-Harvard 2L
*262: this is the post of the year. ATL should make a separate entry separating it.
"Chicago is pissed because it was disowned first from HYS family and then from NYU and CLS' family after it had a rough patch in its life and hates hanging out with Boalt and Penn."
"Also GW died this year."
too good
"separating it" was supposed to be "celebrating it"
A..W. here:
When i was picking law schools, i made a simple decision: i would not pay "private law school prices" unless it was for a Harvard, Stanford, or a Yale. Anything else wasn't worth it, and so mainly i looked at the lower priced schools in the top 25. I went to the number 1 ranked school in the country, and bluntly, i am still not sure it was worth it. And of course there is a special aura attached to those big three. not so much any of the others. certainly if you go to georgetown, when you can go in-state at UT, you are a lunatic.
And i will say that i am dismayed to see the price of all of these schools skyrocket. When i was first thinking of law school in 1995, UT cost about $4,000 a year. it was around $12,000 a year, if memory serves when i went to law school, and now look at it. i used to think it was very cool of Texas to offer such a cheap law school, affordable by most people. but it just isn't true anymore.
255 - the inferiority complex thing derives from a longstanding battle between NYU and CLS for 4th / 5th on the USNews rankings. NYU overtook it a few times in recent history, making the competition even more intense. Most students get into both NYU and CLS and are torn between the two. Both schools offer excellent faculty and placement opportunities. The only real differences are:
- Living in the village v. Living in Harlem
- Ivy league name v. well, not ivy league
- Some marginal strengths for either school in various categories (ie: NYU for tax, CLS for corporations. etc)
The real competition sinks in when you hear NYU students pointing out their quality of life as better or CLS students say things like "join our waitlist" at the Dean's Cup. Or it comes from students who will say "I loved NYU, but I went to CLS because it's an ivy" or "I chose NYU because everyone at CLS is corporate-focused." Basically, poor reasons to choose a school when the differences are really so minor but they perpetuate into this creeping malaise of cognitive dissonance (ie: people telling themselves that they made the right purchase by putting down the alternative).
- CLS/NYU student (hopefully this is impartial enough that you won't be able to tell which one)
I have to agree with those who perceive an inferiority complex from some NYU students, at least those who talk to admitted students. I talked to a lot of NYU students, and all they could talk about (without them even knowing I had applied to CLS) that they are so much "cooler" and they are "so glad" they didn't go to Columbia and everyone at any school other than NYU is a "cutthroat gunner with no social life," and at CLS they are all "corporate whores."
Methinks they doth protest too much. I only know a handful of NYU students, but they seem pretty much like most other law students I know. They certainly don't seem more laid back, or less likely to go to firms, or less competitive than people at other schools, including CLS.
Obviously, the people who go to admitted student events and call admitted students might be unrepresentative of NYU as a whole. But I got the same sense from a TON of people.
On the other hand, the people at CLS (who the NYU students trashed) barely mentioned NYU at all. When asked about it, they would say something like "NYU is a great school and I got in there too, but the [fit/location/funding/whatever] was better for me at CLS." At least from talking to current students, the rivalry seems to be almost completely one sided--NYU desperate to smear CLS, and CLS pretty content and not even thinking too much about NYU.
All top law schools are one extended family:
Imagine HYS as siblings in one nuclear family. Its the family that everyone looks up to and holds their kids up to. Yale is clearly the highest achieving sibling but everyone in the other families still envies all of them. NYU and CLS are twins in another family. They are the cousins who are incredibly respected by the other cousins but still have major inferiority complexes at times. This is particular to CLS. CLS is especially insecure because it used to be common thought that he clearly had more talent than NYU. Now NYU has begun to hit its stride and CLS routinely freaks out. Whenever CLS beats NYU on a math test, or scores 2 extra points in a basketball game; he calls up his cousins at HYS to tell them how good he is and then writes about it in his diary. As NYU gets more talented he begins to get really defensive too and he and CLS just nit pick each other; bringing both schools down in the eyes of everyone else. Chicago is pissed because it was disowned first from HYS family and then from NYU and CLS' family after it had a rough patch in its life and hates hanging out with Boalt and Penn. It routinely tries to go over the top of all of them by trying to hang out with HYS, but they just ignore him and make him do shit for them. Also GW died this year.
270: CLS student
@ 269 -- You're obviously an NYU student. A CLS student would know that Columbia is in Morningside Heights, which though adjacent to Harlem, is a very distinct neighborhood with a history that long predates Harlem. Moreover, I go to CLS and I've never heard anyone say they chose CLS over NYU to go Ivy. I've heard people at other schools suggest that CLS students only go to Columbia because it is Ivy, but I have never met a student here that made their decision on that basis (or at least that admits to it).
Where are all the chicago trolls?
They must not care today. Or maybe they're just happy to be back in the exclusive T6 group, even if they have to share with Berkeley.
Elie...does this mean that you don't subscribe to the T6?
Should everyone say T5 now?
254 - Well, we don't sit and stare at the outside of the building. The inside is quite nice, though. You should check it out.
As for living in the doldrums - I like it fine up here. Greenwich Village is a nice place to visit, but its even nicer to leave when you are sick death of hipster douchebaggery and nonprincipled protests.
269 = NYU student
269: That's very helpful. I'm not sure if this exhausts the differences, though, but your comments are borne out by my experience, and the experience of other associates and hiring partners in informal discussions about the relative merits of the NYC schools.
270: That's not very helpful, because I haven't seen that at either school. Then again, I'm usually at both in an interviewing capacity. Hearing about the chanting at the basketball game is more along the lines of what I had in mind (and this seems to be corroborated by several people). Were NYU students yelling about how bad CLS is?
-255
NYU versus CLS? I say "meh.* Frankly, if you get into both, go where you'd rather live. If you think the differences between them will be determinative when looking for a job, clerkship, etc., you're grossly over-psychoanalyzing those looking at your resume. And if you think NYU kids will be hipper, or CLS kids more business-savvy, you clearly don't know enough people from either school. Now CLS versus UC Hastings (or like)? That's a distinction worth thinking about.
~NYU (cause I didn't get into HYS)
NYU versus CLS? I say "meh.* Frankly, if you get into both, go where you'd rather live. If you think the differences between them will be determinative when looking for a job, clerkship, etc., you're grossly over-psychoanalyzing those looking at your resume. And if you think NYU kids will be hipper, or CLS kids more business-savvy, you clearly don't know enough people from either school. Now CLS versus UC Hastings (or like)? That's a distinction worth thinking about.
~NYU (cause I didn't get into HYS)
274 - 276 - I've lived in Manhattan long enough to know that the area is known by most as Harlem. If you want to be technical, it's Morningside Heights. But ask anyone on the street not at CLS and they'll tell you it's Harlem. Try another "clue."
No one at CLS is going to tell each other they came to CLS because it's an ivy. But I have friends who have gone through the process and have told it to me off the record. One person in particular told me that because he wants to do politics, the Columbia name would stick more with the electorate.
- 269
192--with reading comprehension skills like yours, no wonder you didn't get into CLS. 157, concerning the advantages and disadvantages of attending NYU (including such gems as too many lgbt people counterbalanced by hot girls (query whether those two groups are mutually exclusive)) was purportedly authored by an NYU Law student/alum.
Oh, there is ONE important difference between NYU and CLS: undergrads. Yeah, yeah, Columbia's a better undergraduate institution than NYU. No argument here. Now you're in law school, so who cares. BUT, you still have to hit on undergrads at the local starbucks. And the flirting is better at NYU: NYU has more attractive undergrads plus lots of hot young professionals in the village (rush hour on the W4 platform is awesome), versus CLS which has... whatever Morningside Heights has to offer... nannies?
~279
@269/280 - By "I've lived in Manhattan long enough" you clearly mean "I've lived in the village with my NYU Law buddies long enough..." People who blend Morningside Heights in with surrounding neighborhoods more often call it the upper west side than call it Harlem.
That said, it doesn't really matter what you call it. I'm just pointing out that you're obviously an NYU student because anyone familiar with the neighborhood wouldn't call it by the name of an adjacent and very different neighborhood.
37, you're an idiot. Legally Blonde (the book) was written about Stanford.
280 - known by most as Harlem? Who is "most"? I go to CLS, and the area, while adjacent to Harlem in the east and north, is extremely distinct - even topographically so.
280 - your friend with an interest in politics is exactly right. In fact, that is one case (if he was sure about his path) going to school for the name does matter. Its pretty indisputable that, among layfolk, CLS has more cache (nationally and internationally) because of its association with the Ivy League.
I really think it's unfortunate that Yale ranks so highly. It's clearly a bias in US News. I'm not bitter about rejection--I just didn't apply to Yale because I found it to be completely unattractive option.
Stanford is nice, but it's clearly getting a boost for being on the west coast.
I think Harvard is tops, followed by Columbia, Chicago, and then Yale and Stanford.
282: CLS student? S/he's calling it "morningside heights" and saying that NYU is better based on irrelevant criteria. Unless NYUers really are that dumb.
283/285:
Well, technically, NYU is in the "West Village." I don't see any NYU students on my case for just saying "the village." Face it, most lay people, while recognizing that Columbia is an unbelievable school in the ivy league, will say that it is located in Harlem. I have met enough admitted and prospective students to confirm this. If you think all the students in the CLS class or the NYU class, when they first enter school, think that CLS is located in "Morningside Heights" you are dead wrong. Sorry.
- 269
@287
I'm not a CLS student. For that matter, I could be a Stanford student, but who cares? I'm calling it Morningside Heights because because CLS is in Morningside Heights. http://nymag.com/realestate/articles/neighborhoods/morningside.htm
Oh I get it now: ha, ha, CLS is Harlem, and Harlem sucks.
Irrelevant criteria is my point: the school's are essentially fungible except in little ways unique to each person. Sorry that you're too busy to chat up the locals. Drink more coffee; get more play.
~282
@ 269/288 - Do you have poor reading comprehension? 283 didn't get on your case for saying CLS is in Harlem. He said that it is clearly evidence that you go to NYU.
Most people who grew up in Manhattan consider Columbia to be on the Upper West Side or in Morningside Heights. You clearly did not grow up in Manhattan, which is fine.
You're right that some people say Columbia is in Harlem. For example, I've frequently heard this when talking to NYU students or reading their posts on XOXOHTH.com. Other than that, I don't hear much people confusing the neighborhoods.
And, to get a little nitpicky now, it's okay to elide the villages together. They are all pretty similar and located in pretty much the same area and blend pretty seamlessly. But Morningside Heights is completely different than Harlem and is geographically separated from Harlem more than just about any neighborhood is from any other neighborhood.
No matter how elite and successful the HYSCN claim to be, they still spend their time bickering over who's more elite. It would be funny if they didn't take it so seriously. They really are a gift to humanity.
-BC 1L
P.S. New York City is a shit-filled rat cage. Fight over it all you want.
confused by 281's comment...192 said he got into both nyu and cls.
lol, nobody says columbia is in the "upper west side".. they say it's in harlem you law school retards
290 -
This is stupid. We're arguing over semantics. The point of all of my posts so far has been to provide an objective view of the rivalry. It's clear what side you're on, but it's still not clear what side I'm on. I don't think offering up a common misconception as one thing that an admit would think about puts me on one side or the other.
- 268
Anyone who legitimately thinks that the students at either CLS or NYU are "cooler" or "less douchy" at one school or the other are delusional. The student bodies are exactly the same for all intents and purposes. No matter what shcool you go to, early first year you will figure out who you don't like, and never hang out with them again. I've met some turdbags at both schools, but i don't impute it to the entire campus. I chose CLS over NYU, but it was a tough choice and I wouldn't spend any time regretting my decision if I had gone the other way. The differences are marginal and come down to gut feelings and personal preferences.
Are Harvard Law students really so excited about no longer being tied with Stanford Law in US News? As a Stanford 1L, I haven't heard anyone here who cares. There's enormous overlap in the students who are admitted to Yale, Harvard, and Stanford - the schools just have different institutional personalities. I was admitted to Yale, Harvard, and Stanford and easily chose Stanford and love my life. My college roommate chose Yale and she seems to enjoy herself enough. It's just about what you want out of the school and what your goals are. The questionable statisticians at US News don't affect where you belong.
Though I must say, I don't know that you'll find a happier group of gunners than here at SLS.
149 et. al.
Seriously? You think that the big merit selection in life was based on your high school GPA, extracurriculars, and your SAT score? It's like high school hero syndrome for nerds.
Lots of people go to schools other than Ivies (particularly if they didn't get into the three Ivies that really matter), and they do so for all sorts of reasons.
If you think you're hot because you went to U Penn State and Cornell Law, you are a deluded douchebag. Hell, if you went Harvard UG and couldn't crack YHS for law school, just face it: you suck at life. But you can always talk about your days at Haavaaad.
I'm with 291-
To paraphrase, a Harlem by any other name would smell as putrid.
BC FTW
@ 294 - again, you still don't get it. I'm not weighing in on the rivalry. I'm just saying you are obviously an NYU student and your effort to display neutrality didn't really work. It's okay that you're an NYU student--no need to hide it. I have lots of friends who are NYU students. They're all very cool. I'm happy to drop this, the only reason we've gone back and forth a couple times is because you seem to be arguing past me.
299 -
It's dropped. I'm sure we've had a drink together before.
- 268
How about Dean's TOURNAMENT (instead of Dean's Cup - the bball game btwn nyu and cls) - HLS v. YLS, CLS v. NYU... winners play each other. That would be fun.
286 is flagrantly trolling for Chicago and Columbia. Harvard > Chicago > Columbia > Yale > Stanford? I don't think so.
At best, if you have an extreme large school bias, you could argue it's Harvard > Yale > Columbia >Stanford > Chicago. There's really no way to put Chicago over Yale & Stanford and Columbia over Yale though.
Very surprised that in all these posts, the new Harvard & Stanford pass-fail grading systems have barely been mentioned. If anything, seems like they'll create a permanent wedge between YHS and CCN. It's going to be an even tougher, if not near-impossible, sell to get anyone admitted to YHS (just need to pass to have pretty good job prospects) to take CCN (where ending up in the bottom of the class, especially in this economy, could be disastrous).
37, you're an idiot. Legally Blonde (the book) was written about Stanford.
I go to Columbia/NYU and have several good friends that go to Columbia/NYU, whom I met through either mutual friends or work as a summer. As far as the people go, I can say this: we both are glad we went to the school we did, we both hate gunners and law students who generally take themselves too seriously, and sometimes (YES, THIS IS TRUE) HATE law school because of bad professors (YES, THEY EXIST AT BOTH) and the sheer boredom and grind of it. And we all had ridiculous amounts of freedom in choosing where to work after graduation in the private sector. I can't speak to government or clerkships, but this should be very un-useful to anyone who's deciding between the two.
- Muddling up the issue
71 Stanford students will do judicial clerkships next year, and the class is about 170. About 45 students at Stanford get on Law Review each year. If you go here, the odds that you'll be successful are just a lot higher than at Harvard. I'm not sure how Yale compares, but I doubt it's much better.
I got into Harvard but still went to Columbia. I did this because my wife and I were moving into the country and she got her job in NYC.
I graduated at about the 30th percentile and got to go to any law firm I wanted. I loved the experience. The school was superior to others in terms of Asian law and business and practical law. Also, the student body had almost no competition and was quite nice, though I wish they partied more.
I am sure NYU people feel the same way, but there is no way in hell I'll go south of 14th Street unless through extraordinary circumstances. There's just no reason. Perhaps it's because I'm older, or because I like cleanliness and open areas, but it's a hell hole down there.
I have two points here:
1. Choosing among similarly ranked law schools won't have a big effect on you (most times....geography or academia are the exceptions).
2. CLS has a very good atmosphere, regardless of what NYU trolls say.
SERIOUS QUESTION FOR ALL THE YHS STUDENTS:
Do you feel like a huge loser when you encounter students from "lesser" schools who got better jobs than you? I mean it must be tough to be all proud for going to "YHS" and then ending up in an inferior position to someone who went to, say, Mich or NW.
After all, law school is a means to an end. The first JOB (or clerkship) is what matters. You never see a Sidley associate brag about graduating from Yale to the Mich grad working at W&C or DPW or Cravath!
For example, say you get dinged from the Vault 20 but land a job at a vault 50 firm. Doesn't that SUCK??
The point, is, WHO CARES ABOUT THE SCHOOL RANKINGS???? That's like football players bragging about their high school teams or their shoes (rather than what team they're on NOW in the NFL). What matters is what JOB/FIRM you get. It's funny to read all the YHS dorks brag when a good number of them will end up at firms much, much lesser than mine. And everyone knows that your first firm matters (ie, you can't start out at some V200 firm and then lateral to dpw or simpson based on your law school!).
#308: your argument mocks people for being shallow petty about rankings from a magazine....by saying they should instead be shallow and petty over rankings from a website
FWIW, I would have "gone Ivy", if that was an option.
Waitlisted at CLS, ended up at UVa with cash. Skipped applications to Penn (b/c I'm an idiot) and NYU (just because). Anyway, it turned out nicely for me -- big law, less debt and a wife. God works in mysterious ways.
302,
See my earlier post re: UChicago trolls.
- 63
definitive LS firm analogy
Wachtell = YLS
Cravath = HLS
Stanford = Latham (prestige = S&C, but wrong environment fit)
STB = CLS (still at the top, but has its problems)
Skadden = NYU
Boalt = Quinn E.
Chicago = Shearman (HAHA!!!)
270 - that was my experience as well, and along with what I perceived to be a national placement advantage (which may or may not actually exist), alarge part of the reason I'm a CLS student.
These gross generalizations are really stupid. After skimming through 250+ comments on this rivalry it's impossible to assert that one school is douchier than the other. I've never heard people disparage or even really care about NYU at CLS, and I imagine (my unfortunate admit day incident aside) that people the same could be said about NYU with regard to attitudes towards Columbia.
This bickering is insufferable, and we all come out looking worse.
I visited both Columbia and NYU and liked the area around Columbia and the people at Columbia better than I liked NYU. I like the fact that Columbia has a real campus.
Good work everyone. Glad that's all settled.
Recent Stanford grad here. Hard to compare S with other good ones but what made S a special place for me were:
1. Students that make you think you're in business school
2. California--culture, weather, diversity, etc.
3. Top notch business/engineering students to hang out and to business with in the future
4. Silicon Valley that offers interesting jobs.
T20 schools in my view are all good enough for anyone, however awesome you think you are. Once you got into one of those, whatever marginal benefit of considering prestige is outweighed by other considerations: culture, location, weather, job opportunities, friends and family, etc.
I'm top 2% at a T20 with a $30k scholarship. Is it worth it to stay or transfer to a T5 and take on the extra debt? I can probably get big law where I am. But I'm interested in a clerkship.
Yale is the best. Go there.
NYU is definitely the best public law school. Even ahead of the University of Pennsylvania, another very good school.
I heard that more Columbia Law grads are CEOs of Fortune 500 companies than grads of any other law school. Is that true?
257--correct.
@237,
You'll note that I never said there was a differentiation between law schools either. just that some (not all) of the HYP kids thought my public school degree wasn't as good as theirs. as far as clients are concerned, yeah some of them will be as douchey as you are and some of my law school classmates were. either way, i had a great time in college at a well-respected school which just happened to be public. who cares? clients pay what my firm bills them for me. i have no idea how many of them, if any, are looking me up to figure out where i went to undergrad.
-233
312 nailed it
I'm a YLS 3L. Got into all schools I applied to: YLS, HLS, SLS, CLS, NYU, GLS.
YLS is an amazing experience. There are two primary reasons I'm glad I attended:
1. I'm floored every day by the caliber of students who are my classmates. Nearly all take the study of law seriously, and see it as a means not to make money, but rather to pursue their intellectual and career dreams. Even though I'm going into corporate law (because I love it intellectually), I think I'm typical of the class when I say I was clueless about how much money lawyers make before I attended law school. I just thought the law sounded fun to study, and I was right. Because the class is so small, I knew virtually everyone in my class by the end of the first semester. People can be conceited, but you'll find the people you'll like, and those people will be amazing.
2. The opportunities you have during and after YLS are extraordinary. Rather than having to stay on the treadmill - like students at every other law school in the country - your ticket to a great job is your acceptance letter. Unless you're on the S.C. clerkship track, you just don't have to worry about the 'top third' or 'law review' stuff that all other law students have to deal with. You can enjoy your time, study what you want to study, have a life outside of law school, and thrive in the legal world afterwards. It is the best of all possible worlds, and makes YLS a very enjoyable experience.
37 - see Old School. Piven's character dashes the student body president's CLS dreams.
This probably doesn't get said enough on abovethelaw.com, since its mostly corproate and firm types who read it, but NYU has--hands down--the best public interest community among the top law schools. Its clinic offerings are unparalleled, we have nearly 20 clinics, including nearly a dozen year-long clinics. A higher percentage of our graduates go on to public interest jobs than at any other school.
I'm a YLS 3L. Got into all schools I applied to: YLS, HLS, SLS, CLS, NYU, GLS.
YLS is an amazing experience. There are two primary reasons I'm glad I attended:
1. I'm floored every day by the caliber of students who are my classmates. Nearly all take the study of law seriously, and see it as a means not to make money, but rather to pursue their intellectual and career dreams. Even though I'm going into corporate law (because I love it intellectually), I think I'm typical of the class when I say I was clueless about how much money lawyers make before I attended law school. I just thought the law sounded fun to study, and I was right. Because the class is so small, I knew virtually everyone in my class by the end of the first semester. People can be conceited, but you'll find the people you'll like, and those people will be amazing.
2. The opportunities you have during and after YLS are extraordinary. Rather than having to stay on the treadmill - like students at every other law school in the country - your ticket to a great job is your acceptance letter. Unless you're on the S.C. clerkship track, you just don't have to worry about the 'top third' or 'law review' stuff that all other law students have to deal with. You can enjoy your time, study what you want to study, have a life outside of law school, and thrive in the legal world afterwards. It is the best of all possible worlds, and makes YLS a very enjoyable experience.
If you've gotten into any of these top schools, you are doing great. Anyone can pursue and achieve what they'd like at any of these top schools. YLS has distinguished itself for me, however, in the two ways listed above.
319 -- NYU Law is a private law school, not a public law school. Its existence dates well back into the 19th century. (The main public law school in New York State is part of the University at Buffalo.) The University of Pennsylvania is also a private school (and a member of the Ivy League), and is a different school than Penn State, which is a public school.
320 -- Both Northwestern and Michigan have reputations for placing many law grads as business executives who end up as CEOs. One would have to check the stats to see how their figures compare with Columbia's. For what it's worth, Columbia's reputation is more as a school that places graduates into corporate law firms than as one that places them into corporations as business executives.
324, 327-
then why do i encounter YLS grads at v50 or worse firms? your "acceptance letter" is obviously not a ticket to wherever you want. or did all those YLS grads who start out at v50 or worse firms CHOOSE their firm and turned down all the better firms?
your post is BS. many hiring partners despite yls grads and see them as prima donnas who don't wanna work hard and just wanna talk about "theory." so don't pretend that a yls degree is somehow an auto ticketo cravath, wachtell, or w&c.
Can we shut up about NYU v. Columbia? I don't give a shit. You can trash NYU all day: I like it here, and I've got a good job, and when I get to the point where I can hire law students, I'll care more about their abilities than the name on their degree.
-NYU 2L
324, 327 -
as far as not worrying about law review and top third of class, it goes for all schools on this list. v10 and middle of class at nyu
And 327 is right on with the last comment.
-NYU 2L
Real Rankings:
Yale
Indiana-Bloomington
Harvard
Columia
NYU
These comments are pure comedy. You learn more about Torts from Charlie Nesson than you learn about the quality of the respective schools from these comments. I went to Harvard and the best lawyer I knew was a graduate of BU.
Also ,can the Bowery Boys (Columbia) and the Dead Rabbits (NYU) meet in the Five Points and end this argument?
Wachtell = YLS (top of the top)
Cravath = HLS (highly respected, and some outsiders don't even know it's actually #2, not #1.)
Skadden = Chicago (sweatshop)
Stanford = Williams & Connolly (top of the top, but why do we never hear from you?)
Columbia = Davis Polk (Large, claims to be stable in this economy, but who knows what it below the surface?)
NYU = Cleary ("We're quirky!")
Berkeley = Quinn Emanuel ("we get to wear flipflops!")
> I went to Harvard and the best lawyer I knew was a graduate of BU.
I went to Columbia and the best lawyer I know graduated from Brooklyn.
hey what about cooley law school? anyone?
raise your hand if you read 250.
What? Nobody?
335,
Stanford/W&C -- perfect analogy. You never hear from them b/c they're confident enough not to have to constantly toot their own horns. They're not interested in impressing aunt jenny but know they're the sh*t to the people who matter in the legal industry.
The "my school is better" whining pretty much go to show how most of the people who go to these top schools are insecure fucking babies. All that really matters is how successful you are as an individual. Anyone can be just as successful from any of the top schools (and a few from the not so top ones).
"I went to Harvard and the best lawyer I knew was a graduate of BU.
I went to Columbia and the best lawyer I know graduated from Brooklyn."
One of the sharpest lawyers I work with graduated from Suffolk. Smart, capable lawyers come from ALL law schools, the fact that even needs to be pointed out tells of how deluded most of the people on this board are.
Bottom line: (1) go to a place that you actually want to be at, (2) go to a place where you get a fairly good financial package of some sort, (3) go to school in a CITY so that you can have a legal job during the school year, (4) try your best. And good luck!
209-
"196, terrible analogy. if anything, NYU is Skadden/Weil. it's not Wachtell (although founded by NYU grads) or Cravath (although run by NYU grad); it is a large, relatively new and fast-rising LS, just outside the top in terms of prestige, where the biggest swinging dicks choose to educate themselves."
relatively new?
HLS-founded 1817
NYU Law founded- founded 1835
Yale Law- founded 1843
CLS- founded- 1858
Stanford Law- founded 1893
The John Marshall Law School was founded in 1899, only 6 short years after Stanford.
John Marshal > Loyola.
341,
No, not bottom line. Go to a sh!t school in city you like and end up digging your financial/career grave. On the off chance you are one of the top 5 in your class, you MIGHT have a shot at big firms, clerkships, or jobs resembling something worthwhile. If not, enjoy the local D.A.'s office making $35k a year and pumping/dumping cases through the system. Or chase an ambulance.
There is no price that can measure up to the learning experience, opportunities and value of a top law school education. To be honest, I can't imagine anything else. It goes way beyond learning the material (which is probably similar throughout) an goes towards being immersed in a completely different academic/professional environment. Plus our farts don't smell
- Chicago/Harvard/Yale/NYU/Columbia/Stanford
341,
Great. The best lawyer you know graduated from a TTT. If you are at a big firm worth a lick, the ALL the other 300+ lawyers you work with are NOT from a TTT. That's what students care about. They don't care about the one shining star example, cause realistically, it probably won't be them. They want to go to the safe bet, with the best prospects. To do that, the school almost has to be in the top 10 (or even 5 in this economy).
Truth.
Gentlemen, this debate has failed to capture the most important factor in the NYU vs. CLS decision: the coke is of much better quality in Morningside Heights
-CLS 2L Stud
346 - so are the tranny hookers.
- V15 associate living in morningside heights
It must SUCK to go to HLS or YLS and get your first job at a firm that is worse than someone's who graduated from GULC
All those hours of studying in HS, college, for the LSAT, etc, got into HLS, thought you were set, then for some reason only landed a V50 job, while the GULC guy LEAPFROGGED right over you while working 30% less. So sad..
- GULC, V5 associate
346: coke? no way, maybe the crack
but the coke and weed are much better in the village
326 - Northeastern School of Law is ranked the #1 public interest law school, according to The National Jurist. It costs about $65,000 a year, has basically no financial aid or any ability to place graduates in elite public interest fellowships or positions (ie. ACLU, Southern Law Poverty Clinic), but if you do manage to get a public interest position after graduation, they will gladly give you $13.27/year in loan forgiveness for up to three years, payable in Eritrean nakfas. 10-15% get Biglaw (though very few are NLJ250). They somehow manage to convince a good number of Ivy and other top 20 university grads to throw away their lives every year. It's a remarkable phenomenon. Trust me.
Northeastern '07; unemployed (still)
I work with a really great lawyer who went to Tulane.I also used to work with a complete moron who went to Harvard.
The point is that Northwestern is the best, but only because my dad got his Masters degree their 30 years ago.
SUCK-O-RAMA.
I knew some serious tools in law school, but you guys (and girls, assuming any girls ever post here) are truly epic in your awfulness.
What is with signing off with "___Stud"? Is that an inside joke, or just intentionally homo-erotic?
I work with a good group of people, and so sometimes I forget just why it is most of the population hates lawyers. A few minutes on this page brings it all right back into focus.
350: real question: forgive my ignorance (I'm going to a firm) what is the Southern Law Poverty Clinic and why is it so elite?
and out of curiosity, what are some other elite public interest offices?
Like to get everyone's thoughts on this...
Shouldn't someone who can get into Yale go to a place like Michigan or Penn? Or Chicago?
You will probably be able to beat the pants off of the competition, graduate high, get your super-duper clerkship...and you'll probably get some serious financial aid to go along with it.
Whereas, you might graduate low at Yale, and get stuck with a job at Cadwalder, when you could have been clerking for Justice Breyer.
352,
Stud is a moniker used to acknowledge the outrageous length and girth of my equipment I so delightfully admire in every day while showering. Insofar as you would classify the population of women in Morningside Heights as a discrete and insular group, you could characterize the pseudonym as "inside." In any event, I assure you that it is no joke.
354: a much better bet would be to go to CCN. you still would probably get a kickass scholarship and have an equal chance of beating the pants off the other students (40/60?).
plus, CCN is still a pretty prestigious degree in the grand scheme of things.
354 - Yalies have no chance at Cadwalader. Cadwalader stopped interviewing there, because Yale did not produce the type of lawyers they were looking for (seriously).
@350 -- I am at one of the top five schools ATL posted about above, but I myself almost fell victim to the sway of Northeastern. They've got something very interesting going on there, for better or worse.
Funny thing is that Columbia Law students are often the type of turds who enjoy being north of 14th street. Gross.
354: It wouldn't work like that. The difference in intellectual capability between a Yale law student and, e.g., a Penn law student is minimal. Someone who got into both schools and chose to go to Penn would have nothing close to any guarantee of outperforming his classmates. They likely would do a bit better than an average Penn admittee, but not significantly.
i love how everyone just thinks their school is the best and stereotypes the others. it's such a joke. nobody has attended the other schools and has any idea what they're like.
was waitlisted at Columbia and NYU Law; went to Northwestern; partner at large law firm; $2m in comp last year; 38 years old; this entire post seems really distant for some reason (but kind of entertaining)
354 - please come to chicago, we would love your go getter attitude factored into our scale
175 is COMPLETELY wrong. The international reputation of NYU is no less than that of Columbia. I have lived and worked in BigLaw abroad (3 different countries) for a few years, and NYU has a terrific reputation with lawyers abroad.
So many people I know that graduated from NYU decided on the school because of their strength in International Law... strength that has given the school an amazing rep abroad.
One of my colleagues (experienced lawyer, not interested in tax law) who applied for an LLM this year got into Harvard but they really wanted to go to NYU. Unfortunately, they ended up being rejected by NYU (they got into Columbia as well, but were never considering it).
It's a crap shoot, people! Just admit it.
NYU Law and Columbia Law are academically IDENTICAL.
354: You can't graduate low at Yale. There are no grades. Even if you sucked while you were there, no one would know from your transcript.
357: Cadwalader stopped interviewing at Yale because Yalies don't end up accepting offers there. It was a waste of time for the firm. So many of them want to do public interest or government or academia, and the ones left over interested in private firms wouldn't choose a place like Cadwalader, based on both its work environment and the prestige level of its work.
CLS v NYU: they are right next to each other - NYU on 4th and Cardozo on 13th
222 -- U Richmond sucks big swollen donkey balls. Don't kid yourself.
354: The graveyards are full of students who took the money and went to lower ranked schools thinking they'd end up at the top of the class. Aside from the extreme (the 175 LSAT student will almost certainly do better than the 150 LSAT student), there aren't necessary great correlations between pre-law record and performance in law school. Yet, getting an additional five questions right on the LSAT can be the difference between getting a full ride at a given school and barely / not even getting in there.
This explains why the wise move is almost always to take the higher ranked school. Think of it as hedging against the possibility of not doing so great there -- a real risk almost no matter who you are. And really, you can't underestimate how "'hungry" your classmates at places like Michigan, Penn, Chicago, etc. will be. You beating them by 5 points on the LSAT and 0.2 GPA will only mean they'll be working even harder in law school to prove themselves.
For the idiots who think better schools necessarily mean better students, I can tell you you are wrong.
Obviously, some kid with a 150 at a Tier-4 school will get slaughtered by your average HYS grade, no doubt about it.
But I started my law school career at a TTT Tier-2 school out West (with median ~160 LSAT), transfered to a T25 school (median ~166 LSAT) where I graduated summa cum laude, and then attended an LL.M. program at a T5 school. My observations are as follows:
At the Tier-2 school all exams were closed-book and the curve was pegged to a 3.0, so nearly 40% of all grades were C's or C+'s. If you wanted to simply do alright, it was pretty easy. If you wanted to be top-10%, you needed to claw your way to the top. There were people who memorized the entire restatement of torts for the torts exam. I acknowledge, a good memory does not make a good lawyer. But simply speaking, many of the Tier-2 students are out there to kick ass and take names.
At the T25 school, the students' focus was different. Since ~50% of grads (Prior to this year, of course) landed AmLaw 200 jobs, the motivation really was not there. People were far more intellectually curious, but at the same time people were also far lazier. Whereas it was (literally) common for people to study for 10 - 12 hours per day at my Tier-2, at the T25 people went home most nights at 6PM and called it a day. Since exams were open book for the most part, many of the students just found a good outline and brought it into the final. Sure, these students may have been more creative and analytical, but for the most part, I would honestly say it was easier at the T25 (and my class rank actually went up after transferring).
At the T5, egos ruled the day. People were all very, very smart, but a good number saw law as an intellectual curiosity (which it undoubtedly is) rather than as a real-world occupation. I did not share a grading curve with the J.D.'s, but I can tell you that outlines were available on the intranet, and many people basically walked into finals cold turkey. Maybe it is because they were smarter and could "get away" with it. Maybe they were just lazier.
But at the end of the day, the difference really was not that great. Yell at me if you want to, but the difference of 10-15 questions on a standardized exam does not separate the geniuses from the unwashed masses. Just my $0.02, but having attended three law schools, I think I bring a unique perspective.
This is 369 again.
I also wanted to reiterate: GO TO THE BEST RANKED LAW SCHOOL YOU GET INTO. I went through 4 years of hell and attended three different schools toto make it into Biglaw. I should have just taken a year off after college, done some cool government work, retaken the LSATs, and started somewhere better.
PETROBRAS
GAZPROM
MENEM
LULA???
341 - did this lawyer that graduated from Suffolk go part-time and work at the same time? I know a super smart person that did this.
I'm about to graduate from CLS. It is expensive, and with the job market the way it is, I can't wholeheartedly suggest someone pay sticker for it.
I have to say, though, my professors were exceptionally awesome, and invariably so. Again worth 45k/year in tuition? No, probably not, given that they were charging 32k/year in 2001 for the same experience.
@130 - The average course class size is not smaller at Chicago, even if the average degree class is smaller. I also don't know about this "more faculty contact" claim of yours, but I'm very skeptical.
I'm also about to graduate from CLS. Of the "top 14" schools, I only applied to CLS, Harvard, and NYU. I pretty easily chose CLS over NYU. I got deferred and eventually rejected by Harvard. Had I been accepted, it would have been a tough choice, but I likely still would have chosen CLS.
My point is that these are all great schools, but it really isn't the ranking that matters. You should NOT apply to all the top schools and go into the highest one that accepts you. There are very real differences in curriculum, atmosphere, opportunities, cost, and the surrounding environments of the schools that make them different for different people. Case in point, some people here have discussed Columbia's neighborhood, with critics saying it is either too urban or not urban enough. I think it's just right for my tastes, but of course, realize some people will want somewhere more lively and diverse or more pastoral.
The USNews list gives a very rough estimate of relative prestige, but it gives no indication of what school is best in any meaningful way. Bickering over it, or using it as some sort of definitive guidepost, is silly.
369: you're seeing a very skewed sample of T14 students. I assume you went there while the economy was hot, and so you're in classes where the 2L and 3Ls don't give a shit anymore because they already have rock solid firm jobs. If they lose the one they have, they'll go get another one. So they obviously get lazy. We'll never know for sure, but if you were there with them during the 1L year rush to get good grades for OCI you might have a different opinion.
@369 & 376 -
376 is totally right. Transfer students who go from lower ranked schools to one of the top schools are comparing the 1L experience at the first school to the 2L/3L experience at the other schools. It's like comparing apples to oranges.
Lower ranked schools are definitely much more competitive and intense than the top schools throughout. That's totally true. If you want a laid back, lazy experience you should go to HYSCCN rather than a T3 school. But I don't think the difference is as pronounced as 369 suggests, for the reasons that 376 cites.
I haven't read all of the comments, but note that 6 of 9 sitting Supreme Court Justices are Harvard Law grads (Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, Souter, Breyer). Justice Ginsburg, who has a Columbia law degree, started at HLS and attended for 2 years before being forced to move to Columbia to join her husband, who had been ill. The 2 Yale grads? That wack-job embarassment--Clarence Thomas and mediocre wonder-Alito. Stevens went to Northwestern.
Harvard Law School is #1 and everyone in the world knows it!
Northwestern all the way, baby!!
353 - elite public fellowships/jobs, like everything else in law that is labelled 'elite,' are so defined because there are far more people than slots. Entities like ACLU probably take less than one in twenty would-be applicants. They tend to take out of more highly-ranked schools than NUSL, despite the school's public interest bent.
358 - you made the right choice. Northeastern has a good sales pitch, but horrible execution. The so-called evaluations mostly amount to "this was a fair/good/very good/excellent/outstanding exam," which are easily translated into equivalent grades. The co-op process (2L and 3L years are divided into quarters, and students go on four internships between four academic quarters) mostly serves as a venue for judges and small law firms to get free clerical labor, and career services are nonexistent. Most of the tenured professors are burnt-out 1960's radicals who spew nonsense about how drug companies should give everything away. After HLS, it is the most expensive law school in Massachusetts. I know many people from '07 and '08 who are still looking for work, despite undergrad resumes that will rival anyone on this board. It really is a place where futures go to die.
350
Didn't go to Columbia or NYU (got into better schools), but I visited them for admit weekend in 2007. NYU had more people than they could handle logistically at admit weekend--several classes didn't have enough room for the admits, there wasn't enough food for us, etc. Also, the caliber of students seemed noticeably lower than even Columbia. Lots of kids at NYU were from no-name schools, and in class people's performance was lackluster. My tourguide told me that people don't feel the need to respond when called on in class after just a few weeks. At Columbia, by contrast, the students seemed very engaged, and they carried on pretty impressive discussions in the 1L classes I visited. It is also significantly smaller, and they were able to give the admits more personal attention. So my overall feeling (and that of several other people I spoke with) was that it would be insane to pick NYU over Columbia.
I got into Yale, CLS, and NYU. Didn't have any interest in HLS, and didn't apply to Stanford because (1) I went there undergrad and (2) I wasn't interested in being so far from my then-fiance (now husband), who was on the East Coast. I also applied to and got into Penn and G'town. I went to NYU. I'm happy with my decision. I work at an unnamed fancy-schmancy BigLaw firm in its well-regarded litigation practice. I am up for partner this year and have been advised that I will be promoted, although obviously you never know. Observations:
First and foremost, for what I wanted to do (and am doing) -- work for a BigLaw firm in litigation -- it just didn't matter that much which school I chose. I knew that I did not want to go into academia -- in fact, I actively wanted not to go into academia.
After I got into Yale and informed NYU and CLS that my financial aid package would have a significant effect on my decision-making process, NYU and CLS gave me sizable scholarships. Yale, on the other hand, refused to inform me what kind of financial aid I would be getting before the decision deadline.
I really enjoyed living in the West Village. But I lived in Morningside Heights for a couple of years in the mid-90s (at Broadway & 113th and then at 120th & Amsterdam) and it is a perfectly nice place. If we moved back to NYC, I would be happy to live there with our kid. (Also, Harlem begins at 125th St., Harlem is not scary and has one of the greatest grocery stores in the world (Fairway), and everyone knows that Columbia is in Morningside Heights.)
It was a lot easier to travel between NYC and the city where my fiance lived than between New Haven and that city. That mattered a lot to me.
When Yale called to let me know that I had been accepted, they actually prefaced the news by asking, "Are you sitting down?" (The answer was yes, because I was at work.) When I visited, more than one student told me that if I didn't choose Yale, I would "regret it for the rest of my life." I did not find these kinds of comments particularly endearing.
I probably would have gotten a better clerkship if I had gone to Yale, but in the end it didn't matter.
NO ONE CARES about the purported NYU-CLS rivalry. At least, no one with whom I spent any time. I don't know where posters found all these complainy-pants students, but I'm glad I didn't hang out with them.
YLS 3L (and similar) should understand that while everyone is very happy for her/him that s/he is having a great time at school, none of these law schools really "prepare you to thrive" in a big law firm. In fact, they tend to do the opposite, especially for students who have never had a full-time job. No one will care where you went to law school if you do not get your assignments done on time, write single-spaced 19-page memos with footnotes for a client who wanted bullet points, talk out of turn in meetings with clients, show poor judgment, or are rude to the administrative staff. Yes, you are being wooed like crazy, and will be wooed even more if you get a fancy clerkship. But once you are here, you will have to prove yourself just as if you had gone to Big Al's Fishin' Gear Shop & Law School.
I graduated from HLS over 25 years ago, and everything #382 said is right.
All I would add is that having a degree from Harvard or Yale gives you ALOT more flexibility in your career. For example, my HLS degree has allowed me to raise two children and move in and out of big firm, government, and other private practice. I've worked full-time, part-time and even stepped out for a time, and still never had to prove that I had whatever it was that the job required. My HLS degree gave me some credibility walking in the door. Having said that, as 382 said, once you're in, you have to prove yourself just like everyone else. In fact, I would submit that because expectations of an HLS grad are so high, and because some people would just love to see you fail, you've got to work that much harder. And then don't get as much credit for trying.
Honestly, I was too lazy to write that extra writing sample for Yale's application.
372-"did this lawyer that graduated from Suffolk go part-time and work at the same time? I know a super smart person that did this."
I don't know if this particular person did that, but I know others who went to Suffolk who did. Overall, lots of bright VERY hardworking people there. I find the entire system frustrating. Lower ranked schools are MORE difficult to do well at because of the curves. People at lower ranked schools essentially get served a double whammy of "lesser name" and more rigorous testing. It is a shame, it helps no one.
This has been a very entertaining stream of comments. I hope it doesn't end! As someone currently deciding between NYU and CLS, I can honestly say that I am still torn. When I was at NYU's ASW, the students were really cool. When asked about CLS they said, "It's a great place. Visit both and go to the one you like best." When at CLS's ASW, NYU got several disparaging comments. I understand I had a small "sample size" of students, but I actually did not sense an inferiority complex at NYU, but rather I felt a superiority complex at CLS. I think they know NYU is more or less equal and are trying to make it not so with their comments.
Anyway, just my two cents at a 0L...
As someone who has now been legal recruiting for several years after graduating from HLS and doing both the big firm attorney and in-house counsel things for quite awhile, I have to emphasize that -- regardless of whether or not these law-school rankings are arbitrary or myopic -- they carry a HUGE amount of weight in legal industry hiring, and you will ignore them at your own careerlong peril.
If you're deciding between schools that are pretty far apart in rankings, you should absolutely choose the one that is more highly ranked even if it does not have quite the "quality of life" reputation, etc. On almost a daily basis for years now, I've had to deal with legal employers making hiring decisions based on the quality of the student's school. If you graduate from Harvard Law, then the vast majority won't scrutinize your grades. If you graduate from Penn or Georgetown, they will -- even years later. I know partners who get dinged from top firms because of grading issues when they were at USC or Vanderbilt Law.
If you're choosing between similarly ranked schools, then you can factor in more intangibles, but if you get into a top 8 school and instead choose one that's number 15 or lower, then your entire legal career will be subtly made more difficult. It may not be fair, but it's reality.
For what's it worth, there are different perceptions out there that dog certain law school graduates as well. Yale Law grads are seen as flaky and often not really interested in practicing law for the long term. Columbia grads are typically seen as more serious and dependable than NYU Law grads, who rightly or wrongly are viewed as "public interest"ey types who will worry more about their pro bono work than the profitable cases that firms care about. UCLA Law grads are seen as marginally better than USC Law grads, though that perception is perhaps trending downwards.I remain thrilled that I chose Harvard over Stanford because it is more of a national/international credential that will ultimately carry you further if you are not sure where you really want to end up. Of course if you plan to stay on the West Coast, then Stanford Law is still fantastic.
The legal market is always going to be tight, as there are just too many law schools in this country (really, all schools below tier 2 are superfluous), so go to the best school you get into. Do not make some judgment based on quality of life, as that's a mistake, and employers will not be kind in their judgments.
Further, all of the subcategories of top environmental program, top IP law program, etc., are nice and good, but do NOT choose a non-top 20 school with a good sub-program over a top 20 school. Employers do not care about those sub-program distinctions by and large. They care about how good your school is perceived to be in general, and they care about how well you did there. Period.
With HLS closing the gap with YLS from 9 (100-91) last year to 5 (100-95) this year, and with YLS increasing their enrollment by 25 students this year, anyone else think we might see HLS tie, or surpass, YLS in next years rankings, even if temporarily?
The reason Yale's lead is so insurmountable is their class size. HLS gained 4 on Yale even though Yale's class last year was their typical size. With a 15% increase in enrollment this year, is it really out of the realm of possibility for HLS to gain the remaining 5 on YLS?
YLS is increasing their enrollment by ~15% this year.
HLS gained 4 on YLS in this year's rankings despite YLS' enrollment being typical.
Is it really out of the realm of possibility for HLS to tie or surpass YLS in next year's rankings - even if temporarily - when you factor in the increase in YLS class size?
Class size is the sole reason YLS has been insurmountable in the rankings.
387 (legal recruiter)'s advice is spot on. Disregard it at your peril. Employers will assume you went to the "best" school you could get into. That's often thought to be the highest ranked. All your talk about quality of life, ect. will just be perceived as, "I couldn't get into a better school." And the ranking a school has today doesn't mean as much as the ranking it had 15+ years ago--that's when many hiring partners graduated and their knowledge of the schools, while not set in stone, reflects what they knew back then. Just reality.
306, check out http://lawclerkaddict2009.blogspot.com/
Stanford has the highest percentage of students getting federal appellate clerkships, and the second-highest absolute number of federal appellate clerks (after Harvard, which as you said is three times as big).
I'm with you 384,
I was far too lazy to cater to YLS' little subjective factors panel (and yes YLS admissions is subjective). I let my numbers speak for themselves.
- California born HLS 1L
I had FANTASTIC undergrad grades and LSAT score. I applied to the T5 and was accepted by all. I was poor, but borrowed money to visit all five schools to conduct my own research into the vibe/atmosphere of the schools. Stanford and NYU were BY FAR the most fun of the group, but I chose Harvard. In the end, i realized that the vibe/atmosphere were unimportant when compared with a school's job placement record and i felt that Harvard gave me the best shot for 2 reasons: 1) the HLS alumni network is UNSURPASSED in its depth in both biglaw and government; 2) I honestly feel that my grades were better at Harvard than they would have been in a less competitive environment, such as Stanford or Yale. Alas, i didn't land at Wachtell, but i'm happy at my T5 firm and if i had to do it all over again, i'd make the same choices.
This year's rankings seem more accurate than last years and some on what I saw on http://www.outlines.com
As far as I can tell, the only people who seem to think Columbia is a competitive and miserable place are NYU students, who have never been enrolled as students here.
As a CLS 1L, I can say that I had a great experience here this year. I did NOT spend all my time on schoolwork, and got involved in extracurricular projects, activities, and social events. I've made fantastic friends, none of whom want to stab me in the back (or the front).
Anybody who is considering either school should ignore the hype, visit both places, and pick based on where they feel the most comfortable. The only real negative part about attending CLS is that you keep coming across ATL comments that (wrongly) suggest that your school is a miserable place to be.
I got accepted to H, Y, and S as a transfer student... Framed my three admit letters together, and happily skipped off to Stanford. West coast is the best coast, and for IP, HLS and YLS can't compete with SLS.
How tedious and how insufferably worthless.