October 2014

Corinne Ball Bankruptcy Czarina.jpg* Jones Day‘s Corinne Ball is having a busy week. She’s the lead bankruptcy attorney for Chrysler. “It requires a certain charisma,” said Robert Profusek, head of Jones Day mergers and acquisitions practice. “When everyone is jockeying to have their point of view expressed, who do people stop and listen to? She’s a very charismatic personality.” But one can’t really help but stop and stare listen to someone wearing that. [Reuters]

* … Meanwhile, Wall Street Journal is predicting the Chrysler Chapter 11 filing will go down today. [Wall Street Journal (subscription)]

* Atlanta lawyer Andrew Speaker decided to file a lawsuit this week against the CDC for ruining his life when he had tuberculosis in 2007. That totally sucks for him, but the CDC is dealing with SWINE FLU this week. PIG FLU. How can you think about your silly TB, the destruction of your reputation, the ruin of your marriage, and implosion of your career at a time like this? [CNN]

* Why did Manhattan lawyer William Parente kill himself and his family last week? FBI agents have raided his office to find out. [New York Daily News]

* The problem with the law firm business model is leverage, says Wharton. [Forbes]

* Federal Judge Jay S. Bybee will has been invited to testify before Congress about his torture advice while at the DOJ. A scary prospect given that people like Obam-ite John Podesta want to see Bybee impeached. [Washington Post]

* SCOTUS and the fate of Section 5. [Slate]

Swine Flu law schools.JPGThere is little chance that the American experiment would have survived a serious outbreak of the bubonic plague. The Athenians fought a war while stricken with the plague. Granted, it didn’t go so well, but that’s not the point. But a couple of kids get a new strain of spring flu (which is at least as accurate of a name for it as “swine flu”) and people start losing it.

Of course, law students are nothing if not susceptible to mass hysteria. Take this message that students at Loyola – Los Angeles received:

Dear Students,

Please be advised that students will be permitted to wear breathing masks during an examination. If a student chooses to do so, he/she will be permitted to bring and use the mask at his/her seat in the examination room. This policy will remain in effect through the end of the 2009 Spring examination period. Thank you.

Office of the Registrar Loyola Law School

On the one hand, are people really wasting precious exam cramming time worrying about swine flu? Really?

double red triangle arrows Continue reading “Some Notes on Swine Flu”

Angry clock.JPG* Shareholder suits + TARP = taxpayer bailout for the plaintiff’s bar. Sweet. And if you live in a brick house the pitchforks and torches will have no effect. [Dealbook]

* Did Larry Lessig send YouTube a takedown notice just so YouTube would retain him to defend against the notice? [Boing Boing]

* Advice from a former lawyer and “rookie” mom. [Ivy League Insecurities]

* A blow-by-blow recap of Harold Koh’s confirmation hearing. [Suits & Sentences]

* Here’s some advice on how to write a “killer cover letter.” It is more collegial than mercilessly sabotaging the competition, but I’m not sure if it’s more effective. [Let's Talk Turkey]

* Here’s the thing, if you are going to try and kill the billable hour, you must succeed. You can’t let it linger and heal itself. Because if you try to kill it but only succeed in hurting it, it is going to come back furious and stronger than ever. [Litination]

  • 29 Apr 2009 at 5:25 PM
  • Uncategorized

Columbia Law Glitch

columbia law school logo.jpgDid you apply to Columbia Law School last year for the class of 2011? Did you not get in or decide to go somewhere else? If so, don’t worry, Columbia is reconsidering applications. Here’s an email that a number of 1Ls who are not at Columbia are receiving today:

Dear [Applicant]:

Thank you for your continued interest in Columbia Law School. We are excited to report to you that we have received all the required components of your application and that your file is now complete. We will forward your file to the Admissions Committee, which will evaluate it in the order in which it was completed. Good luck in the admissions process and we hope to welcome you here as a member of the Class of 2012!

Best wishes,

Office of Admissions

Obviously, it’s some kind of screw up on Columbia’s end. None of the students who emailed in have expressed any “continued interest” in being a part of Columbia’s 2012 class.

But, as glitches go, this is a lot better than UNC inviting a whole bunch of people to admitted students weekend, notwithstanding the fact that the students had not been admitted.

But who knows, maybe Columbia looked at its incoming class of 2012, found it lacking, and now they want a do-over.

Update (5:44): It appears that current Columbia students are also receiving this email. 1Ls who are there now and 2Ls that transfer to Columbia after their 1L year.

Update (6:41): And now we have Columbia’s official apology:

We understand that you received an email at approximately [Redacted] p.m. this afternoon stating that your application for admission to Columbia is now complete. This email message was sent as a result of a computer glitch and is not a reflection of your current status at Columbia. Please disregard it in its entirety. We sincerely apologize for the error and want to assure you that your personal information remains confidential.

Yep, all your personal information is totally secure. Move along folks. Nothing to see here.

Earlier: Snafu at UNC Law Raises Hopes, Then Dashes Them

BC Law logo.JPGMore schools are jumping in to try to help their own deferred graduates. Boston College Law School has come up with a “hodgepodge” of initiatives, according to EagleOnline:

* Law School Fellows Program: “as many as twelve positions” will be available, paid at “a modest hourly rate” in places like the Legal Assistance Bureau and the Law Library.

* Career Services Partnership Program: working with some firms and companies, the Law School will coordinate jobs for graduates from September 1 of this year to March 1 of the next, to help out those who are waiting out deferrals or bar exam results. While stipends vary, past participants have “averaged $800 to $1000 per week.”

* Audit Courses: Class of 2009 graduates will be able to enroll in “a number of courses” in the fall semester, without tuition but without the opportunity to receive a grade, with the “understanding” that “graduates will participate in the class as observers.”

* Eagle Scholars Program: while auditing courses, graduates can participate in a weekly seminar intended to help students produce “a law review article of publishable quality.”

* Research Assistantships: in a measure bound to raise the ire of some continuing students, graduates are being welcomed to apply for assistantships with professors. Some faculty members have been given the green light to hire an extra assistant for the summer and fall.

* Public Service Jobs: for graduates waiting out deferrals, the Law School is extending access to PS Lawnet in an effort to connect graduates with public service opportunities.

Unlike some schools, BC Law doesn’t appear to be offering an extension in health care benefits. But at least the school isn’t asking students to go deeper into debt. As long as graduates stay away from the local pig farm, they should be okay. At least the ones who have only been deferred until March 2010 or earlier.

The article also has an interesting quote from a BC Law spokesperson:

“[w]e’re all very concerned about our graduates and the economic situation,” but stressed that while “we all want to help…unless students come to us we won’t know how to help them.”

BC students might want to bring up “loan forbearance” just in case the administration is really unaware of how that might help out deferred or unemployed recent graduates.

After the jump, let’s look at what is going on at Loyola – Chicago.

double red triangle arrows Continue reading “Boston College, Loyola – Chicago: Try to Soften the Deferral Blow”

KL Gates logo.JPGLast month, K&L Gates fired 115 people: 36 associates and 79 staffers.

But since then, K&L Gates has made a number of smaller staff cuts in a number of its offices, including Pittsburgh and Chicago.

The firm refused to comment on its latest reductions. But our sources report that around 20 staffers have been let go from the firm today and over the last couple of weeks. The cuts are coming in the departments you’d expect when a firm is trying to reduce costs. Mailroom staff, the floating secretarial pool, these are the people getting hit right now.

Tipsters also report that in Chicago at least, the recent cuts are Bell Boyd & Lloyd legacy staffers.

Still, it’s got to be particularly tough to survive the K&L Gates March cuts, only to be caught on the backswing now. Nobody is truly “safe” in this economy, but you’d like job security to be a little more than a month-to-month proposition.

Kilpatrick Stockton fires associates after the jump.

double red triangle arrows Continue reading “Nationwide Layoff Watch: Kilpatrick Stockton and K&L Gates Make Cuts”

scalia come and find me above the law.jpgFor those of you just tuning in, we have a little bit of a back and forth going on between Fordham Law School and One First Street. Last week, we wrote about What Fordham Knows About Justice Scalia. Professor Joel Reidenberg, an information privacy law professor at Fordham, had his class compile a 15-page dossier on Justice Antonin Scalia after the Justice was quoted in January saying, “Every single datum about my life is private? That’s silly.”

Dan Solove expounds on Scalia’s privacy views at Concurring Opinions:

[Scalia] believes that certain kinds of information are not private — Internet tracking, most items of consumption (unless embarrassing), addresses, and so on. He partly seems to endorse the view that there’s no privacy violation if there’s “nothing to hide.”

We checked in with Justice Scalia to see how he felt about Professor Reidenberg acting on his professed privacy beliefs. He was not pleased:

I stand by my remark at the Institute of American and Talmudic Law conference that it is silly to think that every single datum about my life is private. I was referring, of course, to whether every single datum about my life deserves privacy protection in law.

It is not a rare phenomenon that what is legal may also be quite irresponsible. That appears in the First Amendment context all the time. What can be said often should not be said. Prof. Reidenberg’s exercise is an example of perfectly legal, abominably poor judgment. Since he was not teaching a course in judgment, I presume he felt no responsibility to display any.

Professor Reidenberg responds to Justice Scalia’s response, after the jump.

double red triangle arrows Continue reading “Update: Fordham’s Dossier on Justice Scalia”

AmLaw 100 2009.JPGIt’s time for another list! The AmLaw 100 is out and we finally get to see some financial numbers from the nation’s top law firms. The 2007 numbers have been totally obsolete since Lehman collapsed, so we’ve been waiting a long time for these numbers.

In terms of gross revenue, there is not much of a change within the top ten:

1. Skadden: $2,200,000,000
2. Baker & McKenzie: $2,188,000,000
3. Latham & Watkins: $1,923,000,000
4. Jones Day: $1,540,000,000
5. Sidley Austin: $1,489,500,000
6. White & Case: $1,467,000,000
7. Kirkland & Ellis: $1,400,000,000
8. Mayer Brown: $1,294,000,000
9. Weil: $1,231,000,000
10. Greenberg Traurig: $1,204,000,000

But we all know that gross revenue is a little uncivilized when it comes to prestige whoring among fellow practitioners. After the jump, let’s take a look at the top ten in terms of profits per partner.

double red triangle arrows Continue reading “The AmLaw 100″

start dates being pushed back to 2010 2011.jpgMany law school graduates are preparing for an endless summer. Endless in that they won’t be starting work until well into the winter. At this point, the majority of firms are starting 2009 graduates in January 2010. There are some outliers though — some firms are starting new associates as early as September 2009, and some are offering them start dates as late as January 2011.

Here are a few of the latest additions to the deferred start dates list from the past week:

  • Foley & Lardner pushed its start date back from September 8, 2009 to February 1, 2010, offering a $10,000 stipend. “The firm did it to protect incoming associates from swine flu,” one of our Foley sources joked.
  • Paul Hastings has deferred all incoming first-year associates from October 2009 start date to January 19, 2010. They’re providing a $10k stipend, optional health insurance coverage starting in October and an optional $5k salary advance to cover required loan payments in the interim.
  • A tipster tells us: “Faegre & Benson (Minneapolis) just called their incoming associates to let them know that some get to start at the beginning of October and some don’t get to start until January. The unlucky ones who are deferred until January are mostly Real Estate and Corporate types. $7500 stipends. Earlier they said ‘at least October, 2009.'”
  • Andrews Kurth has pushed back starting dates to January 2010. Per a firm statement, “The firm will pay each of the new associates in the class a deferral stipend of $10,000; the stipend is not a salary advance or a loan and is not expected to be repaid after starting employment. The firm will also honor its commitment to pay the bar and moving expenses for this class. ”

    After the jump, we’ve got a new round-up of start dates at firms nationwide, sorted two ways: alphabetically by firm name and chronologically by start date (per popular demand).

    double red triangle arrows Continue reading “Nationwide Start Date Round-up: More Firms Join The List”

  • US News logo.JPGLet’s keep rolling through the U.S. News law school rankings. Last time, we learned a couple of interesting things about Emory: ATL has a lot of readers who are alumni of Emory, and the school generates a lot of hate from other law schools in Georgia. Who knew?

    While still first-tier schools, the next batch of schools probably have more regional appeal than national pizzazz. Here’s the list:

    30. Fordham
    30. Alabama
    30. UNC
    30. University of Washington
    30. Washington & Lee
    35. THE Ohio State University
    35. UC – Davis
    35. UGA
    35. University of Wisconsin
    39. UC – Hastings
    40. Wake Forest
    41. BYU
    41. George Mason
    43. University of Arizona
    43. University of Maryland
    45. American University
    45. Tulane
    45. Colorado – Boulder
    45. Utah
    49. SMU
    49. Cardozo

    Man, that’s a lot of “ties.” It’s like U.S. News is trying very hard to tell prospective students “the only difference between Fordham and Alabama is whether you want to practice in NYC or Birmingham.” But based on Monday’s thread, apparently Washington & Lee is the best law school in the country (that nobody’s ever heard of).

    After the jump, is Cardozo happy with its top 50 ranking, or is it coming for Fordham?

    double red triangle arrows Continue reading “Open Thread: 2010 U.S. News Law School Rankings (30 – 49)”

    Page 2 of 2156123456...2156