Add RSS RSS

See, Now That’s How You Run A Protectionist Organization

outsourcing biglaw aba tsunami.gifRemember, way back in August, when the ABA revised its rules to allow outsourcing of American legal work? At the time, we said:

Yet so long as Biglaw remains big business, how long before the work of junior associates can be cost effectively shipped overseas? It’s not like firms want to go to $190K for incoming associates.

People already in the pipeline should be fine. But change is coming to our profession. This ABA decision isn’t the tip of an iceberg, it is the receding sea that anticipates a tsunami.

Note, those words were written weeks before Lehman collapsed, the walls of the 64th precinct started bleeding, and dogs and cats started living together.

Well, we can keep waiting for the ABA to do something to stem the tide of legal job losses. But meanwhile, in a most ironic fashion, the Society of Indian Law Firms is stepping up to try to keep Indian jobs from going to foreign lawyers. The American Lawyer reports:

Lalit Bhasin of New Delhi’s Bhasin & Co calls “totally unacceptable” the idea that the legal profession in India should be treated as a business that “can be acquired, merged, amalgamated, taken over, and sold to global players.” He points to the number of Indian lawyers serving in the judiciary and government, claiming that the profession’s civic role could be diluted by the entrance in the market of foreign lawyers.

But I thought globalization meant … Aren’t we living on a flat … This isn’t how Thomas Friedman said this was going to happen!!!

I need a break. I feel like Jack after Locke blew up the submarine. Check back in after the jump once I’ve collected my thoughts.

Okay, in all seriousness, aren’t protectionist policies bad? Especially when they are tinged with racial aggression? AmLaw reports that the Society went full race card on the issue:

He concludes with a swipe at India’s former colonial master.

“The demand for opening legal services sector in India does not come from Indian businesses or professionals or even foreign multinational companies,” claims Bhasin. “Strangely, the demand comes from foreign lawyers and, particularly, those from the U.K. It is obvious that the U.K. is witnessing a negative growth so far as its legal profession is concerned. Accordingly, India and China offer good prospects—but the problem is that, in India, the legal profession is not a business and it is not up for sale.”

Yep. They just took it there.

In response, the American Bar Association responded immediately. They said …
*crickets*

Sigh. So for those scoring along at home, the Society of Indian Law Firms seems willing to go to the mattresses to protect its home grown legal industry. Meanwhile, the ABA seems more than content to allow law firms to cut costs by shipping work overseas, at the expense of jobs in a rapidly suffocating market.

Globalization: the rising tide that sinks all ships?

Legal Profession in India Not “Up For Sale,” Lawyer Writes [AmLaw Daily]

Earlier: Extinction Level Event: Outsourcing

Comments

Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!

Post Your Comment