Staff Layoff Watch: Hogan & Hartson Lays Off 93 Staff
Remember back in February when Hogan & Hartson offered a “voluntary” buyout of a number of staffers? Yeah, well, apparently that didn’t work so well. After a tepid response to the buyout plan (Hogan chairman Warren Gorrell explains that only 28 staffers accepted the plan out of the 250 people that were offered the buyout), Hogan is bringing the hammer down on its staff. From an internal memo that employees at Hogan just received:
Over the past several months and in connection with other actions to control expenses in all areas, the Firm has engaged in an exhaustive analysis of the impact of current economic conditions upon our personnel needs and structure and the steps appropriate to address the challenges we face as a result of those conditions. Based on that analysis, we reluctantly have concluded that two steps are required at this time: (1) a layoff of 93 non-legal staff members in our U.S. offices;
But that’s not all. Hogan is also essentially cutting salaries on a whole bunch of people:
(2) temporary implementation of our established 1,800 hour associate compensation track in all U.S. offices for U.S. associates whom we cannot currently project will meet their 2009 billable hours expectation.
According to the memo, associates who are not on track to bill at least 1850 hours for 2009 will have their compensation bumped down to the 1800 hour level. In New York and Los Angeles offices (where there was no previous 1800 hours track) low billing associates there will be put on an 1800 hour track commensurate with the firm’s DC compensation scale.
And, just for good measure I suppose, the firm is also indicating that these cuts might not be enough, and attorney layoffs would be the next step:
We are hopeful that we will not need to continue this arrangement in 2010. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that will be the case or that we might not have to take other measures to address staffing/work levels for associates in the future.
Finally, Hogan is also letting its overseas brothers and sisters know that layoffs probably will not be limited to U.S. offices:
The Firm is undertaking a detailed review of our associate and staff personnel requirements in our offices outside the U.S. Unlike our offices in the U.S., where personnel needs and rules typically follow a common pattern, the management of personnel needs in our offices outside the U.S. is influenced by local market requirements and other considerations. We are conducting an office-by-office review to ascertain whether staffing in those offices is at appropriate levels.
Good luck to all the staff laid off today. Take heart Hogan associates who didn’t average 155 hours over the first quarter, at least you still have a job.
Read the full memo after the jump.
HOGAN & HARTSON — MEMO — RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
To: All Personnel
From: The Executive Committee
Date: April 2, 2009
Re: Response to Economic Conditions
Over the past several months and in connection with other actions to control expenses in all areas, the Firm has engaged in an exhaustive analysis of the impact of current economic conditions upon our personnel needs and structure and the steps appropriate to address the challenges we face as a result of those conditions. Based on that analysis, we reluctantly have concluded that two steps are required at this time: (1) a layoff of 93 non-legal staff members in our U.S. offices; and (2) temporary implementation of our established 1,800 hour associate compensation track in all U.S. offices for U.S. associates whom we cannot currently project will meet their 2009 billable hours expectation.
In addition, we are undertaking a comprehensive review of associate and support staff levels in offices outside of the United States. This review is being conducted on an office-by-office basis, in coordination with the relevant Office Managing Partners.
U.S. Staff Layoff. It is with great regret that we have determined to implement a staff layoff in the U.S. We had hoped that the voluntary separation program we announced in February would largely address our staffing overcapacity. We made that offer to about 250 staff, but only 28 accepted it. The ever-increasing integration of technology into the legal practice, combined with a diminished need for staff personnel growing out of current economic conditions, has resulted in our being overstaffed with both assistants and personnel working in various Firm departments. We reluctantly have concluded that only through a layoff can we reach the reduced staffing level we need to achieve in order to operate efficiently in the future. The individuals being laid off are being personally contacted today, and each is being offered an above-market separation package of from 4 to 6 months of compensation, depending upon their tenure with the Firm (4 months for persons with less than 2 years of tenure, 5 months for persons with 2 to 5 years of tenure, and 6 months for persons with more than 5 years of tenure), together with a transition allowance to cover such things as COBRA medical insurance expense.
Affected staff will be notified personally over the next several hours. Their final work day will be tomorrow, April 3, and new assistant assignments will be announced to take effect Monday, April 6. The Human Resources Department, Office Managers, and Department heads will be coordinating reassignment of work from departing staff members.
1,800 Hour Track for Certain U.S. Associates. For a number of years, the Firm has offered associates two compensation tracks in most of our U.S. offices: one track has been set at 1,950 hours, and the second track has been set at 1,800 hours. Associates on the 1,950 hour track receive higher base compensation than associates on the 1,800 hour track. After having considered a wide range of alternatives, we have concluded that the best alternative for the Firm and for our associates is not to lay off associates but instead to temporarily implement our 1,800 hour track in all U.S. offices for associates whom we cannot currently project will meet their 2009 billable hours expectation. In arriving at this determination, we have taken into account many different factors, including the input that we received informally from a number of associates to the effect that they would prefer to see us try to address the current situation through compensation adjustments, rather than layoffs.
Accordingly, effective April 1, 2009, we will move to the 1,800 hour track those associates in U.S. offices who are not annualizing for the current compensation year at 1,850 or more billable hours. No other associates will be affected. In those offices where the 1,800 hour track is currently available, the base compensation for affected associates will be adjusted to the compensation rate for associates in their office working on the 1,800 track (with somewhat higher compensation levels for associates in the classes of 2006, 2007, and 2008). In New York and Los Angeles, where we have not previously had the 1,800 hour track, we will as a temporary measure use the same compensation as that paid to associates in Washington working on the 1,800 track (with the same somewhat higher compensation levels for associates in the classes of 2006, 2007, and 2008). In Houston, we have temporarily adopted a modified version of the 1,800 hour track compensation level.
We are hopeful that we will not need to continue this arrangement in 2010. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that will be the case or that we might not have to take other measures to address staffing/work levels for associates in the future.
Review of Non-U.S. Office Personnel Levels. The Firm is undertaking a detailed review of our associate and staff personnel requirements in our offices outside the U.S. Unlike our offices in the U.S., where personnel needs and rules typically follow a common pattern, the management of personnel needs in our offices outside the U.S. is influenced by local market requirements and other considerations. We are conducting an office-by-office review to ascertain whether staffing in those offices is at appropriate levels.
* * *
We have come to these decisions only after extensive review of the alternatives, and mindful of the personal cost to those directly affected, as well as the temporary but significant disruption that all of us will experience. Ultimately, our judgment is that these actions, painful as they are, are necessary to the ongoing and future success of the Firm as a whole. These extraordinary times do not permit us to act as if the world has not changed.
With respect to the staff layoff, we recognize how traumatic this layoff will be, both for those who will be leaving the Firm and those who will be staying. It will be extremely hard to see the departure of colleagues with whom we have had close professional and personal relationships. They have been valuable contributors to H&H, and they will be greatly missed. Obviously, we would not be conducting the layoff if it were not compelled by the economic circumstances in which we, like other law firms and businesses generally, find ourselves.
Thank you for your cooperation and understanding in this sensitive and difficult matter.




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
Zowie, that's a lot.
First!
poopshovel
Wasn't Hogan & Hartson a cop drama from the 80's?
when will it stop?
FIFTH
I might have to cancel my plans to go rub my feet on the couch in my lawyer's office. There's no point if he can't afford a new one.
Welcome to paycuts. Also, good luck to those on "probation"
Good job Elie of not putting up what the difference in base compensation is between the 1800 and 1950 hour tracks. Can't you at least pretend to be a journalist once in a while, instead of just forwarding memos onto this web page?
5 = epic fail.
What is the $$$ for the 1800 hr track?
whats the deal with hogan start dates?
Do this mean the ship be sinking...?
WHY STAFF, BUT NO ATTORNEYS???????????
Run yourself like a NY firm . . .
Is this the beginning of big layoffs at DC firms?
What about the Denver office? I heard that it was facing a huge downturn in demand and the firm is talking about closing the office or at least drastically reducing numbers.
LATHAM NY LAID OFF MORE THAN HALF THE 1ST YEAR CLASS????!!!!!
OH DEAR GOD, WHY??!! WHY????!!!
also would be good to know whether the laid-off staff got equivalent or worse deal than the 28 staffers that participated in the voluntary departure plan....
The 1800 hour track, I believe, starts at $125k in DC. I'm not sure what the "somewhat higher" amounts would be for CY 2006-08. I'd guess probably around $135k.
Which LA Based firm has already made the determination to only offer 50% of their summer associate class full time positions?
17 - You are an idiot. Denver is one of the strongest Hogan offices per capita, and is still fairly busy overall and the litigation dept is extremely busy. Clearly you work at a Denver TTT and are jealous.
staff = epic fail
21- If it's Latham, I'm going to kill myself. And if it's not Latham, I'll eat my hat.
I agree that the separation is "above-market." The severance, therefore, will be above-the-shoulders.
Transparent and classy. Good handling of a bad situation.
23 = 3L w/o a job or a clue
wiley rein moved people to the lower track a month or so ago.
predictions for permanent offer rate for summers this year?
22 - Clearly you are a nervous TTT lawyer at a TTT sattelite office that is trembling in your shoes waiting for the infamous knock on your door announcing the end of your pitiful career.
Not 17
IHogan is also moving their start date for new associates from November to January to align with the market.
Locke Lord Houston > Hogan anywhere.
Hogan is TTT, even in Denver - there are much better firms represented here
I was on the 5 train this morning and we ran on the lower track because of signal problems. It was no big deal.
Yes we can, my fellow Americans!
Not to worry though, there will be plenty of jobs available soon in my national healthcare system. We are going to need lots of staffers to manage the waiting lists and deny claims.
33 - your mom is a TTT and flushed you out like the turd you are.
Stop posting about staff. Only lawyers matter.
Why don't the partners take a cut in salary to save a few jobs? While non-legal staff are being let go, new laywers are being brought in. (Chris Wolf and US Senator Warner are joining to the DC office.) It is understood that attorneys bring in the clients, but who keeps everything organized so that new clients can be brought in and are kept? In a lot of cases, the very people that are losing their jobs.
My thoughts and prayers to those who have lost their jobs.
I always found the "1800 hour track" amusing - signing up for that track just announces to the world that you are a joke.
37 nailed it.
27 = sTTTaff
36 - looks like someone is sorry they made the TTT choice they did
20, the 1800-hour track in DC starts at $145k... so far as I understand it, its the old $145k track.
I love Paul Bearer
January is typically dead for corporate attorneys (even when things were good). Seems a bit unfair to have those hours included for annualization purposes.
36 - looks like someone is sorry they made the TTT choice they did
Associates are staff. The ones who don't make partner are wasted investments and worth less than support staff.
I want to hear from the Professor on the cost/benefit of staff v. attorney reductions at big firms. My guess is a lot of partners would save their own staff before a bunch of 1st year associates stuck in cubes doing doc review. (Yes - I mean you 37 and 40 - I know you are cube drones).
Didn't the DC office have a particularly high staff-to-attorney ratio? Makes sense.
Not only is the Denver office facing trouble. The office in Boulder is all but closed down already. How many big firms will that make now that have had to close shop in Denver?
Balch & Bingham rescinded offers and cancelled summer program.
This would never happen in Hogan's Pueblo office.
There is a rumor in the office that we will only be taking about 40-50% of our summer classes in all offices.... I remeber the days when summer jobs would guarantee a permanent offer. Good luck guys.
1800 track is 145K, and if an associate made their hours at 1950, the difference was made up in bonus, so many were on 1800 even though they were not really "on it," but were instead hedging so the didn't look bad if they fell short.
1800 track is 145K, and if an associate made their hours at 1950, the difference was made up in bonus, so many were on 1800 even though they were not really "on it," but were instead hedging so the didn't look bad if they fell short.
3rd year at H&H; does this mean no chance of partnership here?
53 - That is a lie. Stop the fear mongering.
53 are you in H&H? If not give us a hint as to what firm..
56, no; you should probably resign and find a different mid-level associate gig at a different large law firm.
52 - Spot on. Pueblo H&H is the most prestigious and profitable office.
I'm being told by staff who got the package that this layoff is 4 months pay + $2,500 and 65% of COBRA paid.
Any confirmation that Hogan is pushing back its start date to January?
Hogan's plan seems like a pretty decent alternative to layoffs. Really slow assocates (i.e., those associates who might have been on the chopping block at other biglaw firm) continue to make $145,000+ and people on track for hours feel no pain whatsoever.
62 - Start date of whom?
61 - And yes that's accurate, though the X months of pay is based on your length of time with the firm, up to 6 months.
64 - Start date of incoming first year associates who are currently expecting to start November 30.
#26 - "Transparent and classy": Whatever. How about great mind control. Firm pays less, but layoff ax still hangs over the associates' heads. Make 'em sweat and try desperately to bill non-existent hours until the ax inevitably falls. Aren't you guys lawyers that can figure these things out?
Right on 63. Seems like a good idea.
What's a "staff"?
65% of COBRA paid is because of Obama's stimulus package getting passed -- nothing to do with the Firm's generosity.
65% of COBRA paid is because of Obama's stimulus package getting passed -- nothing to do with the Firm's generosity.
It is amazing what some heartless cowards will say on these pages, so long as they can hide behind the veil of anonymity. Calling some of you vultures would be a disservice to vultures. Huge and kisses, Matt Wood.
It is amazing what some heartless cowards will say on these pages, so long as they can hide behind the veil of anonymity. Calling some of you vultures would be a disservice to vultures. Hugs and kisses, Matt Wood.
Come to think of it, I should have just stuck with huge and kisses rather than double-posting. What a wasted investment I must seem to the legal giants that roam these pages!
Matt Wood = up for partner. Atta boy, Matt.
63 and 67 are Warren himself. He loves to post on chat boards and try to pump up Hogan's weak reputation.
F*CK Warren. These bastards have already cut over 10% of their workforce through stealth layoffs and they continue to cut. Also, that bastard Warren promised at the beginning of the year that while he could never say never about layoffs, he would not push us down to the 1800 track if the lack of work was not our fault. This firm is a TTT. They don't pay you a decent bonus when you bill 2400++ and they immediately take away your comp when things slow. Bill 2400 last year (and every year before that), have a slow 2 months because of economy and vacation/holidays, but then have it pick up over the next couple of months, and have your comp cut by around 50k (+/- depending on class year). What a bunch of c*cksuckers. Who will man this sinking ship when the work comes back (like it already has)? While Warren thinks he is a genius, he is really a moron. And if he didn't have his hand in everyone else's originations, he would have none because his precious REIT work is dead.