Add RSS RSS

Texas Tries to ‘Launch’ Students into the Job Market

UT Austin school of law logo.JPGWe’ve got another new program from a law school that is trying to help its students weather the difficult job market. The University of Texas School of Law is initiating the “Long Career Launch Program.” The goal of the program is to help Texas graduates find public interest work:

The University of Texas School of Law (UT Law) is proud to announce the Long Career Launch Program, which is designed to make it financially possible for our recent graduates to obtain legal work experience in unpaid internships while they are awaiting bar results and looking for permanent employment. Graduates who are selected to participate in the Program, which is generously funded by a grant from the Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long Foundation, will receive a $6,000 stipend to support work in an unpaid legal internship with a government agency or a 501(c)(3) public interest organization.

Unfortunately, the program only extends to internships lasting between August and November 2009. That is not quite enough time to help students that have been deferred until January 2010, and it is a woefully inadequate amount of time for students who have been deferred all the way until the fall of 2010.

But it is something.

Perhaps the most important part of the program is that it encourages public interest organizations to contact UT directly and post their job openings with the school. Ideally, this will lessen the transaction costs for UT law students trying to find appropriate public interest organizations so they can get their deferral stipend.

The Texas march on the top-14 continues.

Earlier: Northwestern Law Gets ‘Proactive’
UCLA: The Latest Law School To Help Deferred Students

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 3:59 PM

This is called padding employment %.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:01 PM

Will they help everyone find a wife, 3500 sq. ft., and a Lexis?

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:07 PM

2, the state has abundunt supplies of all three. You don't find them - they find you.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:07 PM

What does Latham have to do with this?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:07 PM

1 - actually, it won't pad employment numbers, as the NALP numbers survey graduate employment as of February of the following year (so for the class of May 2009, it will survey employment as of Feb. 2010).

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:09 PM

or abundant

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:10 PM

Why is everyone in Texas so humongous?

8 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:11 PM

The ship be sinking...

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:12 PM

This program isn't new ... Texas has been paying recent grads to take public interest or government internships for a while now. Only difference is that, with Joe R. Long's money involved, the program must be renamed the "Long Career Launch Program."

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:15 PM

This pads the "employed upon graduation" numbers.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:17 PM

5 - OK, but that doesn't stop the school from publishing its own numbers online or in Fall 2009 admissions packets. I remember doing an employment survey at my school as a prereq to graduation, the same day that we went in to get our commencement tix.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:21 PM

Elie: you're missing the point. Again.

UT is interested in HIDING GRADUATES in its "employed" numbers. That's why it's a three-month program. So that, at graduation, they can check the box as "employed."

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:24 PM

The lack of analysis in non-Lat posts blows my mind sometimes.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:33 PM

can you use the 6k towards the 42k necessary for the UCLA LLM? because that truly would be the best of both worlds.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:36 PM

13, sometimes no analysis is better than piss-poor analysis.
Check out some of Mystal's "analysis" in his affirmative action or pro-Democrat posts.
Or read his analysis in the OJ post where he said it is ok for a double murderer to go free because a cop in the investigation was racist.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:37 PM

I hear Fried Frank is hiring

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:38 PM

Looks like Texas is putting the "smart money" into its students

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:40 PM

Who cares if they are padding employment numbers? As a deferred 3L , I would love for UVA to do something similar.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:44 PM

This is nice. UT pays students $6,000 to work for a NPO for a few months.

Compare to UCLA which will "steal" another $40,000 of loan money to give students a worthless dogshit-LLM.

Lesson learned? UCLA sucks.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:48 PM

Damn I wish my school offered something like this!

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:52 PM

Why does everybody say Texas girls are hot when everybody from Texas is large and fat?

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:53 PM

is there any doubt that the Latham guy is only 1 guy?
it's silent because he's busy today

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:54 PM

I am obese.

--Texas guy

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:57 PM

I was accepted at TTTexas...I opted for GULC

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:03 PM

24: I'm sorry to hear that.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:20 PM

FLAW w/THESE PROGRAMS: THEY DON'T ADD JOBS OR CREATE VALUE. THEY ONLY ADD ANOTHER LAYER OF COMPETITION FOR EXISTING UNPAID INTERNSHIPS.

But hey, it's a nice way to shift recent grads "off the books."

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:26 PM

Note that this program specifically excludes those with deferred offers per the program requirements. I thought it would be a great way to spend part of my deferral period and looked in to it; no dice.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:26 PM

Note that this program specifically excludes those with deferred offers per the program requirements. I thought it would be a great way to spend part of my deferral period and looked in to it; no dice.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:32 PM

hook 'em horns! i'm driving my lexis right now, with the top down in this gorgeous Texas weather (my westlaw is at the shop for repairs)

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:37 PM

Why don't the firms just lower the first year salary to $1500 a month and call them in to work?

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 6:09 PM

FYI
The Long Career Launch Program is open to December 2008, May 2009, and August 2009 graduates of the UT School of Law who will be taking the July 2009 bar exam. It is open only to those who have not yet secured permanent offers of employment; it is not open to those who have secured jobs but have deferred start dates

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 6:34 PM

So 1 of the 3 paragraphs elie wrote is completely inaccurate and worthless. At least he's getting better!

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 9:43 PM

Of course it excludes people who have a job, but won't be starting right away: "looking for permanent employment" is not the same as "has a job with a late start date."

Deferred graduates should be counting their blessings. A bar stipend and a likely job in a few months is a lot better than the uncertainty that is not having a job in this economy thanks to the lack of public interest hiring (by no means helped by the "public service stipend" bullshit).

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:22 AM

19 -- UCLA is far better than Texas (in every program that the school offers). The fact that Texas Law is even close to UCLA Law represents a major flaw in the rankings methodology

35 Posted by LaidOffDiary | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 2:21 AM

Texas has too much money. UT is super rich. But at least they are trying to do something so I give them some props and UT is the only good school in Texas (and it's really highly ranked though I wouldn't be surprised if they bought some of that ranking with black gold money, but can't blame Texas. You know the east coast law schools buy and sell on their reputation of elitist new englanders for right or for wrong).

What's Texas' motto? Don't Blame Texas? Don't something Texas. I can't remember. I dated someone from Texas once who wouldn't stop reciting one liners about Texas. Needless to say this person didn't leave much of an impact except for annoyance since I can't remember anything said person, um, said. But it had more to do with their bland personality than Texas itself.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 2:24 AM

It's funny that UT is more well regarded and more highly ranked than any shit hole firm that is based out of Texas.

Does that mean that the students from highly ranked UT are in fact, dolts and can't make anything out of themselves?

Or does it mean that all the good students from highly ranked UT went to carpet baggers or left Texas?

You guys decide. But one thing is for sure, UT is more respected than the firms based out of Texas (it's also probably because Austin is way cooler than Houston or Dallas)

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:47 AM

34 -- great analysis, you must be a UCLA prelaw or 1L.

- UT 3L

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:01 AM

UT 3L: You must be unemployed ---- I'm at a top firm :)

34

39 Posted by The Texas Tiger | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:04 AM

Y'all this sounds like a cover for socialism. I made my daughter go to Baylor Law School because I knew that any Texas school that hires a New York Jew is bound to turn my daughter into a commie. At Baylor, they're Baptists, and that's good enough for me.

40 Posted by The Texas Tiger | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:06 AM

37,

Quit fightin' with that city slicker. He's probably one of them homosexuals. Best to steer clear. You're welcome.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:21 AM

39/40: Isn't your mom also your aunt? Don't talk shit on Jewish people.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:21 AM

39/40: Isn't your mom also your aunt? Don't talk shit on Jewish people.

43 Posted by The Texas Tiger | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:46 PM

Please refer to me by my name, "The Texas Tiger" instead of by number. While you're at it, go to this link:
http://dictionary.reference.com/dic?q=satire&search=search

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 23, 2009 2:11 PM

34 - How about any engineering program? You must have been a political science major.

And nobody at a respectible firm says they are "at a top firm". I am guessing you are a 0L who was rejected from UCI.

Post Your Comment