* The Supreme Court short list has been leaked. Surprise: There’s a man on the list! Under consideration are Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, U.S. Appeals Court judges Sonia Sotomayor and Diane Pamela Wood, and California Supreme Court Justice Carlos Moreno. [Associated Press]
* Bill Gates is firing his dad’s firm. Microsoft has dropped K&L Gates from its preferred legal providers list. [Seattle Times via ABA Journal]
* A murdered lawyer in Guatemala left behind a video blaming the president of the country for his assassination. [Wall Street Journal and Associated Press]
* Obama may not comply with the 2nd Circuit’s ordered release of detainee abuse photos. [Washington Post]
* “Michelle Obama: Why I left a ‘big ol’ fancy’ Chicago law firm.” [Chicago Sun-Times]
Archive for May 2009
Well, here we are. The third-tier law schools. We’ve given students and alumni at the top 100 law schools a chance to sound off on the good (and bad) about their law schools. Hopefully prospective students will take note.
We won’t list all the the third-tier schools, but you can refresh your memory here.
Some might ask: in this market, what kind of jobs can you expect to get with a degree from a third-tier law school? The economy is so bad right now for lots of lawyers. Does it get worse without the most sterling credentials? Or are the kinds of jobs these students historically have taken still available in this market?
If you really applied yourself, could you become a Supreme Court clerk? Justice Scalia doesn’t think so.
Let’s get into the discussion, after the jump.
Continue reading “Open Thread: 2010 U.S. News Law School Rankings (The Third Tier)”
* Should Facebook ban Holocaust denial groups? [The Cuban Revolution; The Lede]
* What can be done to protect fashion designers from cheap imitations? Two law professors, including one-half of Feldsuk, opine (and give a shout-out to our sister site, Fashionista). [Slate]
* “[A] paralegal used the Find/Replace feature on Word to make an old-timer partner’s brief more PC and remove certain colloquial terms. The end result? The brief cited to ‘African American’s Law Dictionary.’” [Courtoons]
* Our very own Elie Mystal is part of a long line of HLS grads who have left the practice of law for other pursuits. [Black Book Legal]
* Hall passes required for summer associates? Satirical — for now. [Litination]
* An interesting event next week focusing on legal issues in the digital media space. [NY:MIEG]
* Speaking of digital media — can you Twitter your way to a job? [Young Lawyers Blog]
-
Posted in:
Fish & Richardson, Intellectual Property, Layoffs
Nationwide Layoff Watch: Fish & Richardson Throws Associates/Staff Back
By Elie Mystal
Fish & Richardson conducted attorney and staff layoffs at the end of January. But it looks like it is already time for round two.
The internal announcement just went out, Fish is laying off 120 people:
The global recession has profoundly impacted many businesses. Continuing to face unprecedented levels of economic uncertainty in the marketplace, the firm has decided to make workforce adjustments that will ensure our continued strength during these turbulent times. Specifically, we have reduced our legal staff by 35 and our support staff by 85 across our U.S. offices.
Fish & Richardson spokespeople did not respond to our requests for comment. But it appears that cuts are happening across all of Fish’s offices.
This round of layoffs is being cast differently than last time. Details after the jump.
Continue reading “Nationwide Layoff Watch: Fish & Richardson Throws Associates/Staff Back”
-
Posted in:
Harvard, Harvard Law School, New York Times, UVA Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Weddings, Williams & Connolly
Legal Eagle Wedding Watch: Couple of the Month for April
By Laurie Lin
It’s time for readers to choose the Legal Eagle Wedding Watch’s Mr. and Mrs. April 2009. Will it be the couple with four Penn degrees, the spunky HLS grads, or the silver-haired former ambassador and his Bushie bride?
Keep in mind that when you vote, you’ll be helping to determine which couple will be eligible to compete in December for the honor of being ATL’s 2009 Couple of the Year — the crème de la crème of legal/marital enviability.
Here are your finalists:
1. Elissa Bassini and Jeremy Pick
2. Tracy Zuckerman and Ryan Van Grack
3. Leslie Fahrenkopf and Thomas Foley
If you’re ready to vote, here’s the poll. If you need a refresher, you can find our write-ups on the couples after the jump. Voting concludes at noon on Friday.
Continue reading “Legal Eagle Wedding Watch: Couple of the Month for April”
Each week, Above the Law’s sponsors generate content for your edification and entertainment. You can find their posts in Sponsored Content, which runs along the right-hand side of the ATL main page. Here are the latest offerings:
1. Bull Market Growth in Bear Market Times? That’s McKool Smith. And They’re Hiring!
Finally, some good news. McKool Smith, which has been successfully expanding its New York office, is looking for top-flight commercial litigation, white collar, and IP associates. To learn more, check out the job posting.
2. Job of the Week: Deferring? Don’t Just Travel Somewhere Cool, Work Somewhere Cool
Has your firm offered you a paid leave under a sabbatical-type program? If so, might you be interested in spending that time in an in-house position? To learn more about the possibilities, see Lateral Link.
3. The Asia Chronicles: Anatomy of an Asia Placement
What opportunities are available in Asia for associates right now? And how do you go about landing such a gig? Evan Jowers of Kinney Recruiting offers information and insights.
Thanks to our sponsors for their contributions and their support. To learn about advertising opportunities on ATL, click here.
A new study shows that women who have children — but don’t put their careers on hold to raise the kids — perform just as well as men when it comes to salary and partnership prospects:
A study of data concerning graduates of the University of Michigan Law School showed no significant difference between men and women who had children yet didn’t interrupt their careers or work part-time to take care of them. However, it revealed a significant gap between those attorneys and their colleagues–both male and female–who put their careers on pause for several years to stay home with the kids, says law professor Kenneth Dau-Schmidt of Indiana University at Bloomington.
“Gender was secondary, and much less important, than whether they had interrupted their careers to do child care,” he tells the ABA Journal.
This is excellent news for nannies and au pairs everywhere.
On Monday, we asked readers if this was a terrible time to have a child. Over 60% thought having a kid wasn’t the best idea in this economy. But maybe many of your were assuming that if you had a kid you’d have to feed it or talk to it or something.
Apparently that is not the case. And if you outsource the child rearing, there might not be any deleterious professional consequences.
Of course, women that take significant time off to spend with their young children can get something a little more intangible than money.
More notes after the jump.
Continue reading “Gender Gap Disappears If You Just Keep Working”
-
Posted in:
Layoffs, Sullivan & Cromwell, Summer Associates
Update Potpourri on Sullivan & Cromwell
By Elie Mystal
Even people who were not stealth layoff victims write us at Above the Law, pissed about their firm’s shady treatment of their friends and colleagues. And when stealth layoffs happen at top firms, we get top emails. We initially reported that 15 – 20 people were quietly let go from Sullivan & Cromwell, but that number keeps growing:
Now about the layoffs. 30+ is much more close to the truth than 15-20 previously reported. As you have mentioned, this 15-20 associates were the ones told in February who now have already left. But layoffs are ongoing. I can personally [list names]. I’ve heard from a senior associate (who was told by friendly partner) that the plan is to lay off 10% of associates, in NY that would be about 45-50. I am … pissed about … how they handle it….They would rather destroy your reputation and self-esteem than concede to economic layoffs.
Does S&C really think that it can lay off 10% of its associates without anybody noticing?
Or, to put the question another way, does S&C really want people to think that 10% of its associates are bad lawyers?
But, this particular tipster doesn’t just want to cast aspersions and hide. Instead, the S&C associate provides hard evidence of Sullivan’s scaled back summer program.
More details after the jump.
The Illinois Attorney General, Lisa Madigan, has scored a victory for prudes decency and safety. Craigslist will be removing its erotic services section in the next seven days:
llinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan says that Craigslist is getting rid of its “erotic services” ads and will create a new adult category that Web site employees will review.
This would never have happened if Roland Burris was still around!
In fairness, who knows how long Craigslist could have fought off all the subtle prostitution available on the site.
The efforts by Madigan and other attorneys general came after a lawsuit by Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, in which he claimed that Craigslist was “the single largest source of prostitution in the nation.”
But once people started dying over this stuff, it was probably just a matter of time:
Craigslist came under renewed pressure to remove the ads after Philip Markoff, a medical student in Boston, was charged with the April killing of a masseuse he met on the site.
Craigslist will start offering an Adult category which is more closely monitored by employees.
You know it just got a little easier out here for a pimp.
Illinois AG: Craigslist is getting rid of ‘erotic services’ ads [Newser]
Madigan: Craigslist To Drop ‘Erotic Services’ Ads [CBS 2]
-
Posted in:
Education / Schools, Money, Student Loans
Student Loan Bailout: The Choice of a New Generation
By Elie MystalA couple of months ago, it occurred to me that if the government didn’t start tackling the student loan issue, people would simply stop paying off their loans:
The stick is this: nobody is really going to pay you back anyway. Where do you think loan payments rank on a priority list that includes: food, shelter, anti-depressants, and résumé paper?
According to USAToday, that is precisely what is starting to happen:
Student loan defaults are at their highest rate since 1998, and likely will go higher. And though federal student loans offer some payment modification options, private loans are far more onerous, because even filing for bankruptcy rarely wipes out the debt.
Congress might tackle bankruptcy law reform again this year, but it decided as recently as last year not to allow student loans to be easily discharged through bankruptcy filings.
Just to be clear, if you are a financial idiot and you rack up thousands of dollars in credit card debt on flat screens and rims, you can get that wiped out in bankruptcy. But if you take out loans to pay for your education, and you can’t get a job because the economy has stopped, the debt will follow you to the grave.
More horror stories that the baby boomers don’t want us to talk about after the jump.
Continue reading “Student Loan Bailout: The Choice of a New Generation”
* The legal battle over ownership of our genes is on. [New York Times]
* This is why you shouldn’t mess with tech geeks. The Pirate Bay owners have devised a scheme to bankrupt the law firm responsible for their prosecution. [Guardian]
* East Coasters will no longer have to trek west to bet on sports. Delaware becomes the fourth state to legalize sports betting. [ESPN]
* AG Eric Holder is getting those race relation discussions he wanted. But in the form of plaintiffs asking the DOJ to intercede in discrimination and civil rights lawsuits. [Washington Post]
* Yesterday, we told you Dechert CEO Barton Winokur was taking a $1 million pay cut. Apparently, there are 36 Dechert partners in total who have opted to whittle down their pay checks. [American Lawyer]
* Courts in New York and Wisconsin disagree when it comes to warrant-less GPS tracking devices on cars. [True/Slant]
-
Posted in:
Contract Attorneys, Document Review, Layoffs, Notes from the Breadline
Notes from the Breadline: Comes A Time (Part II)
By Roxana St. Thomas
Ed. note: Welcome to the latest installment of “Notes from the Breadline,” a column by a laid-off lawyer in New York. Prior columns are collected here. You can reach Roxana St. Thomas by email (at roxanastthomas@gmail.com), follow her on Twitter, or find her on Facebook.
This column is a continuation of last week’s column, which you can read here.
When Olivia tells me that she may have a “possible” document review on which I could “potentially” be staffed, I don’t really believe her. In fact, I have the same feeling I get when I read the spam in my Gmail inbox. I’ve won £1,500,000,000? An undisclosed sum from the Loteria Espana, or perhaps De Lotto Netherlands? It sounds nice for a moment, until you realize that it’s bullshit. The promises of the British Lottery, the “Microword Corporation,” and Mr. Van Curtis of the Delta Lloyd Bank are illusory, gigabytes of sounds and fury, signifying nothing. Likewise recruiters, who often make it sound as though the fabulous job they are describing is yours for the taking — a done deal! Then you never hear from them again.
So I am surprised when Olivia calls me back a few days later to tell me that the “possible” document review has actually materialized. “How would you,” she breathes, pausing dramatically, “like to be staffed on the project?” Something about her delivery makes me wonder if she once dreamed of being a game show host, and has stood before her bathroom mirror telling imaginary guests that they will be going on a four night, five day trip to … Aruba!! I feel as though I should jump up and down and scream, clapping my hands. Instead, I tell her that I would be delighted to work on the project.
“That’s great!” she effuses. She gives me some minimal information about the project (a large pharmaceutical case) and the pay ($30 an hour for the first forty, and around $35 thereafter), then tells me a little bit about the firm, using the most generic terms possible. The people who work there, she says, are “just really nice,” and “a pleasure to work with.” She thinks I’ll “have a lot of fun.” In addition, she adds, the firm sometimes hires temps for full time positions. She says this as though she is telling me that, if I am really good, I might get ice cream at the end of the day.
“Really?” I say. “How often does that happen?”
“Oh, from time to time,” she answers. “It has happened.”
I do not jump up and down and scream when we get off the phone, but I have to admit that I am excited. Though the pay is modest at best, $1200 a week is more than I’m making now. And if the gig lasts for two or three weeks (Olivia’s estimate), I’ll have at least $2400 (or more, if there’s overtime) to throw at my bills.
But I also have some concerns. Read about them, after the jump.
Continue reading “Notes from the Breadline: Comes A Time (Part II)”
-
Posted in:
Day Pitney, Layoffs
Nationwide Layoff Watch: Second Round of Layoffs at Day Pitney
By Elie Mystal
Back in February, Day Pitney laid off a number of staff. Today, the bad news has trickled up into the associate ranks. The firm wide memo just went out:
Earlier today, we met with 20 associates and counsel to notify them that their positions are being eliminated. The reductions are spread throughout our offices and practice areas. We deeply regret the need to take these steps. All of the people whose jobs have been eliminated are highly skilled professionals who have made significant contributions to the Firm. Each person has been offered a severance package that includes outplacement services.
Does anybody know when the Day Pitney summers are starting?
At least the displaced Day Pitney associates will get to enjoy their summer without having to worry about working inside all day. Fresh air, clean living, and maybe some camping? They can get a head start on learning the post-apocalyptic survival skills that will be key come the fall.
Read the full memo after the jump. Good luck to those who lost their jobs today.
Continue reading “Nationwide Layoff Watch: Second Round of Layoffs at Day Pitney”
* Yesterday, we had a law student trying to be a cheerleader. Today we have an associate (formerly at Allen Matkins) who is going to be a Minnesota Vikings cheerleader. Hopefully she’ll be able to adapt her firm bio for her new role. [Minnesota Vikings]
* In fairness, nominating this woman might cause some of the older justices to keel over, thereby creating even more openings on the Court for Obama. [Famous DC]
* Live blog of the “Cool” Cass Sunstein hearings today. I couldn’t watch it. Whenever I see Joe Lieberman I go all pyrokenetic. [Law Dork 2.0]
* Maybe we should just sequester every single jury on a trial expected to last more than two days? [Underdog]
* “Geez!, if you don’t enjoy practicing law, find another line of work.” Okay. I choose Starting Pitcher for the New York Mets. Wow, that was simple. When do I start? [What About Clients?]
* Have you ever bought something, worn it for a night on the town, and then returned it? Apparently, you’re not hurting the company you bought it from as much as you are screwing over the nice lady who helped you try it on and didn’t call you fat as you waddled back and forth from the changing room. [Fashionista]
-
Posted in:
Dechert, Partner Issues
Partner of the Day: Barton Winokur Takes a $1 Million Pay Cut
By Kashmir Hill
As we’ve been reporting on layoffs, salary freezes and salary cuts, some disgruntled associates have suggested in the comments that partners should share more in the pain. Well, they are. In addition to PPP taking a hit due to revenue declining, de-equitizing partners now seems to be an option (and is rumored to have already happened at Jenner & Block, for example).
Barton J. Winokur, chairman and CEO of Dechert, is stepping up to the pain plate voluntarily. The firm has laid off attorneys and staff in the past few months, but firm leaders have taken a hit too. Winokur, for example, is taking a $1 million pay cut, reports the Philadelphia Inquirer:
Winokur disclosed the self-imposed pay cut, actually a reduction in his draw from firm profits, at a super-secret gathering of big-firm leaders organized by Thomson Reuters in Pebble Beach, Calif., in late April.
Typically, there is no press at this yearly conclave. An absence of publicity ensures its near-invisibility – and the candor of law-firm leaders, which Winokur apparently supplied in abundance.
In addition to his salary cut, Winokur emphasized that other Dechert leaders had taken similar hits.
The Inquirer points out though that Winokur took home $8 million the year before. But, hey, a 12 percent pay cut is still pretty substantial. And $1 million will probably be a larger percentage of his total take home this year as it’s not likely to be as good as last year. The first fiscal quarter was an ugly one.
Law Review: A law-firm CEO cuts his own pay [Philadelphia Inquirer]
-
Posted in:
John Yoo, Law Professors, Media and Journalism, SCOTUS, Supreme Court
Did I Miss the Part Where John Yoo Actually Matters?
By Elie MystalBerkeley Law School professor (and former Department of Justice attorney) John Yoo published his inaugural column in the Philadelphia Inquirer on Sunday. He argues that Obama should nominate somebody FDR would have liked to the Supreme Court:
Franklin Roosevelt faced exactly this dilemma. With large majorities at his back, FDR pushed through sweeping legislative efforts to end the Great Depression (which never really worked). His only obstacle became the Supreme Court, which held several basic New Deal laws to violate the Constitution’s limits on federal powers and the economic rights of the individual. Only after FDR waged a campaign to increase the size of the court and give himself more appointments did the justices surrender. The New Deal could not have survived without judges that deferred to the legislature on economic regulation.
Obama could make a pick based solely on race or sex – though it’s not clear why the most empathetic judges are minorities or women – to please parts of his coalition. But if the president wants to secure the success of his economic, political, and national-security objectives, he should remember FDR’s example and choose a judge who believes in the right of the president and Congress, not the courts, to make the nation’s policies. If Obama shoots for empathy instead, he will give Senate Republicans yet another opportunity to rally around a unifying issue where they better represent the majority of Americans.
Wait, so now FDR’s court-packing scheme was a good idea? Because it hobbled SCOTUS and forced them to defer to Roosevelt’s amazing enhancement of federal power? A conservative believes this?
Before we get too bogged down in Yoo’s argument, can somebody remind me why we care about what John Yoo has to say?
The left (over) reacts, after the jump.
Continue reading “Did I Miss the Part Where John Yoo Actually Matters?”
-
Posted in:
Education / Schools, Fordham School of Law, Law Schools, Legal Ethics
Cheaters Never Win, Winners Never Cheat
By Elie MystalI’ll admit, I’ve never really understood the utility of cheating on a test. Even if you don’t get caught, what have you really gained from getting a couple of extra questions right? A third of a grade? A full grade? It just strikes me as ridiculously hypocritical. If you really care that much about your grades, isn’t it better to just put in the work over the course of the semester? And if you don’t care about your grades, why do you suddenly lose your nerve at the very end?
In any event, I suppose the terrible economy is making a lot of people think creatively about what their transcript will look like when it comes time to find a job. It looks like a spate of cheating scandals has erupted among some New York law schools.
The Syracuse University College of Law is so worried about the problem that it is cracking down on people with weak bladder control:
Students can now use the rest room only once during an exam, which can last four hours, because some are suspected of using cell phones or looking at papers in the bathrooms. Students with medical reasons to use the rest room more often than once per exam must provide medical documentation to a dean.
“During this exam period, we have received a significant number of reports from (first-year) students alleging academic dishonesty,” read an e-mail sent by law school deans to first-year students.
Forty years I been asking permission to piss. I can’t squeeze a drop without say-so.
While Syracuse adopts the Depends Honor Code, Fordham hasn’t decided if it will do anything at all. Details after the jump.
-
Posted in:
Layoffs, Willkie Farr
Stealth Layoff Watch/Impending Layoff Watch: Willkie Farr
By Elie MystalLast week, a very angry comment appeared in one of our threads:
Well its official Wilkie [sic] Farr Gallagher has started the rounds of FIRINGS. It is utterly despicable that these firms can turn around and fire people under the guise of “poor performance”. After treating their associates as two bit whores for years they sending them out when the fleet is in. As soon as the ships leave the harbor the partners at these firms toss their associates out like the used prophylactic used to service their clients. Its understandable that in a bad economy that belts have to be tightened but to have the outright GALL to place the blame on the associates who have worked 80 hour weeks and worked through weekends for you, just to stamp them with “sub-par” is outrageous.
The truly troubling point is that the Mayor of New York Mr. Bloomberg seems to be ok with such behavior. Since he has no in house council he attorneys are Wilkie attorneys, so in a sense his own employees. I for one am not sure I can vote for or abide by a man that allows his own employees to flat out degrade associates like that. Since there is a growing number of individuals who seem to come across a similar situation maybe a statement needs to be made. Bloomberg wants to be mayor again, maybe he should side those of us that need his help and damn the disreputable firms, otherwise we’ll have to find someone who will.
For those of you who are not fluent in ATL commenter-speak, allow me to translate: “Willkie is doing stealth layoffs. I’m voting for Bill Thompson because I got fired from Bloomberg News for poor performance. I think sailors look so cute in their little hats.”
After running down sources for almost a week, Above the Law can now confirm that stealth layoffs have actually occurred at Willkie Farr, and more formal moves could be coming.
We get into the details after the jump.
Continue reading “Stealth Layoff Watch/Impending Layoff Watch: Willkie Farr”
-
Posted in:
Associate Bonus Watch 2009, Sullivan & Cromwell
Sullivan & Cromwell Spring Bonus
(And: The 2009 Summer Associate Budget)
By Elie Mystal
Last week, we reported on stealth layoffs at Sullivan & Cromwell. We mentioned that 15 to 20 associates were laid off (although subsequent reports we’ve received indicate the number may be closer to 30).
We also observed that S&C’s promised spring bonus would be an excellent opportunity to see if the layoffs were motivated by the economy, or by poor performance from the firm’s attorneys. Last week, I wrote:
This provides Sullivan with a rare opportunity to prove that its layoffs are performance based. If everything is fine, if the economy is not a factor, if the firm has really just laid off 15 to 20 “bad lawyers,” then maybe S&C will reward the good lawyers still at the firm?
Well, news is now trickling in about the special bonus S&C paid out late last week. Last year, the spring bonus was as much as $30,000 for eighth-year associates.
This year, sources report that eighth-year associates topped out at $8,500. For first-year associates, the spring bonus was $500.
No, I didn’t miss a zero.
One tipster reports general dissatisfaction with the bonus:
People here are mostly furious. We view it as extremely insulting to our intelligence that the firm would tell us this is about economic problems despite having sky-high PPP — almost a million above Skadden. Morale is terrible, both because of the stealth layoffs and the shameful bonuses. People are talking about leaving when the economy picks up.
It doesn’t sound like things are looking much better for summer associates. More details after the jump.
Continue reading “Sullivan & Cromwell Spring Bonus
(And: The 2009 Summer Associate Budget)”
-
Posted in:
Crime, Samuel Kent, Sex, Sexual Harassment
Federal Judge Samuel Kent Will Have To Make His Advances on Female Prison Guards
By Kashmir Hill
We noted in yesterday’s Morning Docket that libidinous federal judge Samuel Kent is heading to the slammer for three years. We’ve covered Kent’s unraveling extensively, but new details continue to emerge.
Kent is the first federal judge to be charged with a sex crime. He could have faced up to 20 years in prison, but a plea agreement got him a shorter sentence of just 33 months. Despite loudly proclaiming his innocence last year, the 1990 Bush appointee now admits to being an alcoholic and having “nonconsensual sexual contact with two employees between 2003 and 2007.”
From the Houston Chronicle:
Cathy McBroom, the one-time Galveston case manager for Kent who made the formal complaint that led to the judge’s downfall, said he first attacked her in a small room about 10 feet away from co-workers when he came to work drunk. She said she didn’t want to give up her job and her pension so she tried to avoid him as much as possible, while Kent told people she wanted the affair.
“Being molested and groped by a drunken giant is not my idea of an affair,” McBroom said. She said she lost her marriage, her Galveston position, sleep, self-esteem and more and asked Kent be sentenced so he and others will remember it.
Donna Wilkerson, Kent’s secretary, said Kent sexually and psychologically abused her starting her fifth day on the job.
“He said he hated bullies. How sad,” Wilkerson said. “He’s the biggest bully of them all.”
She said she believes Kent is “crazy” and she fears for her family’s safety.
The ABA Journal points out that Kent is still being paid a judicial salary. Kent’s lawyer says though that Kent intends to “retire early due to an unspecified disability.” Does ‘being a sexual predator’ count as a disability?
However, Kent may not have the retirement option. Rep. John Conyers, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Lamar Smith, the committee’s ranking Republican member, are getting the congressional impeachment process started today.
Kent sentenced to 33 months behind bars [Houston Chronicle]
Disgraced Judge Gets Nearly Three Years in Prison [Wall Street Journal]
Judge Kent Apologizes to His Family, But Not Claimed Sexual Abuse Victims [ABA Journal]
Earlier: Previous ATL Coverage of Samuel Kent



