Add RSS RSS

Sonnenschein Salary Update

Salary Cuts.jpgLast week, we told you that Sonnenschein would be cutting its associate’s salaries. At the time, Sonnenschein pointed out the hit to first year salaries:

Our first year Associate base salary under the new approach will be set at $145,000 in most of the cities in which we operate, and the salary levels for the balance of our Associate classes vary by year and geography consistent with our standard practice.

What does “consistent with our standard practice” mean? Above the Law has received word on what the salary cuts will look like for the rest of Sonnenschein’s associates. Tipsters report:

* 2002 and above = 15%
* 2004 = 15%
* 2005 = 14%
* 2006 = 14%
* 2008 = 10%

Did anybody expect Sonnenschein to ask its more senior associates to take a larger pay cut than its junior associates?

More news from the firm after the jump.

Sonnenschein logo.jpgAssociates at Sonnenschein were taken aback by the significant cuts for more senior associates:

In view of Elliott’s redundant remarks regarding the disconnect between first year associate pay and value added by first year associates, SNR associates were led to believe that more experienced associates would be less affected by the pay cuts.

Tipsters also report that partners at the firm have been given talking points to use with firm clients:

Elliott also distributed an email to partners re how to spin the firm’s cuts. Partners are to notify clients that Sonnenschein associates are now not motivated to inflate billing because they have no monetary incentive to do so… Clients have not received a rate decrease.

But some tipsters are not worried about salary cuts. Instead, some associates are simply trying to hang onto their jobs:

Elliot & friends are literally evaluating attorneys month by month, week by week and if an attorney has a bad month (never mind the multi-year profitable performance leading up until now) they are labeled as “underperformers” and go on the chopping block. Definitely associates are being pushed out … The last round was approximately late March and another stealth round is or has happened following April’s performance.

Keep hanging on, Sonnenschein associates. It’s always darkest right before the dawn.

Earlier: Nationwide Salary Cut Watch: Sonnenschein Has Had Enough of Lockstep

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:36 AM

phirstie?

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:36 AM

Obama chooses Sotoayor as SCOTUS nominee FIRST TO SAY

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:36 AM

Obama chooses Sotomayor as SCOTUS nominee FIRST TO SAY

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:36 AM

Obama chooses Sotomayor as SCOTUS nominee FIRST TO SAY

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:37 AM

Obama chooses Sotomayor as SCOTUS nominee FIRST TO SAY

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:37 AM

Well, I'd have preferred the 15% cut to getting laid off, but I chose to work at Paul Hastings.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:38 AM

Obama chooses Sotomayor as SCOTUS nominee FIRST TO SAY

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:41 AM

This firm is a joke

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:42 AM

Good luck recruiting against my firm.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:44 AM

Sonnenschein is so ghetto they make Ole Dirty Bastard look like Warren Buffet

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:45 AM

Did Sonnenschein also freeze salaries? If so, you have 3rd years making 1200 dollars more than 1st years.

Good to be employed, but first years watch your back. Most associates will be upset with the Partnership but their hatred will soon turn to you.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:46 AM

Sonnenschein is so gay they make Richard Simmons look like Mike Tyson

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:46 AM

I know they stated that they are going to a holistic billing approach but isn't the firm's talking points implying that associates will not be laid off based on billables? If billables still matter from a job retention standpoint then how does this approach eliminate the pressure on associates to pad hours?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:49 AM

Sonnenschein is so ugly they make Miley Cyrus look like a Lakers cheerleader

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:50 AM

This sounds like the worst law firm to work for in the country. Insiders? Ex-associates? Anyone got war stories?

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:51 AM

This idiot Elliot really wrote up some talking points saying that the firm's associates now don't have an incentive to pad their timesheets? What about before? Is Sonnenschein giving clients a refund for excess/false time billing?

I nominate Elliot for the Thelen Award for Excellence in law firm management.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:52 AM

Sonnenschein is so dumb they make yo' mama look like some asian looking person

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:54 AM

Sonnenschein is so fat they make Rachel Ray look like Kate Moss

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:55 AM

As an outsider looking in -- looks pretty dysfunctional from a management perspective,,,,

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:59 AM

18 = gold

21 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:05 AM

The ship be sinking...

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:07 AM

wow. Ass backwards. Go figure.

23 Posted by partner emeretuss | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:09 AM

As a law student in the bottom quartile of my class, I applaud anything firms do that does not eliminate positions. Maybe there will be hope for me yet!

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:12 AM

I graduated mediocrum laude from my law school. Where can I find a job that doesn't require me to wear a hair net?

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:13 AM

23 -- Use that optimism to start a new career, because that's your only hope.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:14 AM

I received an offer at one of their regional offices a few years ago. It just seemed like amateur hour.

This firm will not last. Partners forget that 5th year associates with be midlevel corporate counsel in 7 years. Fat chance marketing Sonnennschein to any person who has graduated law school since 2000. What a horrible reputation.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:15 AM

Sonnenschein is so impotent they make Elie Mystal look like Ron Jeremy

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:16 AM

Of course we still have incentive to bill heavily. The only way we're guaranteed (and even then...) some amount of our salary cut back is by getting to 2000/2200 hours. If you get to 2000, you get back 50% of your cut. If you get to 2200, 100% of your cut. Sure it's a lot of hours for not a lot of dough, but still. It's hours-based incentives, Elliott.

Although honestly - you're right to think we don't have an incentive to bill. Or work. Or do anything except polish our resumes.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:18 AM

What do you expect from a firm that paid millions to Steve Kudenholdt, Paul Tvetenstrand, and their band of slack-gawed douchebag horribles? Go give 'em a big Sicilian kiss.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:19 AM

23 = EPIC FAIL

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:23 AM

To be expected from a firm that would pay millions to Steve Kudenholdt, Paul Tvetenstrand, and the rest of their slack-jawed posse of douchebag blumpkins. You are paying for their kids' private school and their condos in South Beach. They destroyed peoples' lives.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:26 AM

Did Sonnenschein also freeze salaries? If so, you have 3rd years making 1200 dollars more than 1st years.

Good to be employed, but first years watch your back. Most associates will be upset with the Partnership but their hatred will soon turn to you

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:28 AM

K&LGates next...

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:33 AM

SkaddenLA is an absolute mess right now.

35 Posted by DennyCrane | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:38 AM

It occurs to me that firms like this, who I refer to collectively as Hacks! , constantly say they are re-evaluating their compensation structure and desire to move away from lock-step pay. Now, if you are trying to rid your hack-ass firm of lock-step pay, why would you employ lock-step pay cuts? Just a though...

-Denny Crane

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:41 AM

13 & 16 - Agreed. These guys must actually be retarded. First, to tell your clients that your associates won't be padding hours ANYMORE. And second, to do so at a time when there is more incentive then ever to pad hours! What idiots, really.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:43 AM

Lat on CNN right now.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:00 PM

38th donut for MysTTTal today

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:02 PM

Clients are entitled to a refund for prior years padding?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:21 PM

Is Lat gay? He sounds gay. Maybe its just being on TV that make you sound gay. He definitely sounds gay though.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:25 PM

As a 3L w/ a big firm job, let me be the first to say


Salary cuts to 145k >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. Rescinded offers

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:02 PM

41 - So cry me a river. Where else you gonna take an entry level job for a six figure salary?

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:05 PM

40 - Go back to kindergarten

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:29 PM

Sonnenschein so dumb they stared at the orange juice for an hour cause it said "concentrate."

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:57 PM

Sonnenschein stealth layoffs. TTT.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:43 PM

Oh, I have a little dirt on the lit group of this toilet. A college friend of mine worked there a few years ago-what a dysfunctional shithole. The lit associates were told to enter hours *daily* and there was a shrewish lit partner who checked associate hours at the end of each day. If they entered less than 8, they had to call her the next morning and explain why. This woman also apparently walked around each week with a print-out of associate hours, telling different associates that each had the lowest total and that she was concerned for their future. She also tracked internet usage and would call and ask what they had been doing on x.com, or whatever. This made it very difficult to find another job.

He went to a call-back lunch for a lateral where the other (more senior) associate told the candidate something along the lines of "Look, you seem like a nice person. Do not come work here." Another associate kept a liquor stash in his/her office and the associates would hide in there and drink in the middle of the day.

He also worked with this toolish service partner who padded his bills on a big case like crazy (because he had no clients of his own).


avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:16 PM

42 - can you read?

41 said salary cuts are better than layoffs.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:56 PM

I tend to agree that the all powerful K&L Gates is next. They talk a big game, but when it comes down to it they're just another middle tier firm trying to pretend that it's a member of the in crowd. Then again, once they announce the pay cuts I'm sure they will also announce that they have just decided to gobble up another firm.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:10 PM

Cuts were upwards of 15% -- 17.2 is the highest floating around the office with the arm of doom swooping down next week. Staff has also been called to a universal meeting on Thursday. chop chop. (www.legalstaffbuzz.com)

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:10 PM

Cuts were upwards of 15% -- 17.2 is the highest floating around the office with the arm of doom swooping down next week. Staff has also been called to a universal meeting on Thursday. chop chop. (www.legalstaffbuzz.com)

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:11 PM

Cuts were upwards of 15% -- 17.2 is the highest floating around the office with the arm of doom swooping down next week. Staff has also been called to a universal meeting on Thursday. chop chop. (www.legalstaffbuzz.com)

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:55 PM

40: Lat isn't gay, he just has a thpeech impediment, thatth all, thilly. Thufferin thucatathhhh.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:55 PM

40: Lat isn't gay, he just has a thpeech impediment, thatth all, thilly. Thufferin thucatathhhh.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:16 PM

This firm has severe Napoleonic complex, just like its little chairman.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:26 PM

Denny Crane used to work at Sutherland

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, May 27, 2009 1:32 AM

46, I can remember years ago that someone else told me that a Sonnenschein senior associate bad-mouthed the firm to a law student he was interviewing and told that student to pick a better firm. That firm is pure crap right now and has been pure crap for some time.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, May 27, 2009 2:17 AM

56 is right on the money. This firm has been craptacular for some time. Look at that pathetic leverage ratio they're employing (some on this site have said it's 3 partners/associate). Yeah, a lot of high margin work is getting done in that absolute shithole. Closing offices and rescinding offers...all in a day's work over at that dirt chute.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:06 AM

"Hard Anal" Tvetenholdt.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:38 AM

Doesn't Portnoy realize that clients want to WIN their cases? The top lawyers are headed for the door -- they know they aren't going to be paid, and the dumb ones will figure it out come the first of the year. If he wanted to break from lockstep he would not have put forth a lockstep pay cut. The better law firms are all laughing because it makes them look 10 times as good not cutting salaries 30%. This is just about what Portnoy and his ilk bring in on a yearly salary. Is he really worth so much? Where is the value when they are not lowering billing rates? The bad rep. on this firm is going to make landing clients impossible -- why not go elsewhere when you are going to get top-tier representation for the same or less money? It takes an incompetent lawyer 3x as long to complete the same assignment as a competent one and the quality isn't present. Sure, there are many young lawyers out there who would take this job for 75k a year -- but they suck, and they will lose. Mid-tier firm moving to bottom-tier while Portnoy puts all the "savings" in his pocket. This game will be played for a couple of years and then Portnoy will move on to an overpaid lobbying position leaving whats left of the firm in flames.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, May 27, 2009 2:20 PM

Even though Portnoy has been Chairman for only two years, there already are a bunch of "old sayings" about Portnoy. As to Portnoy's "Associate New Paradigm Manifesto," the most apt of the "old sayings" is "The longer the memo, the bigger the lie." When Portnoy has his Thursday "discussion" with the staff, expect the memo to double in length. And just wait until the associates and the staff come to their senses, decide to unionize, and to to Hoffa, who will have little patience for Portnoy's then-hot-off-the-presses union-busting manifesto.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, May 27, 2009 2:22 PM

Even though Portnoy has been Chairman for only two years, there already are a bunch of "old sayings" about Portnoy. As to Portnoy's "Associate New Paradigm Manifesto," the most apt of the "old sayings" is "The longer the memo, the bigger the lie." When Portnoy has his Thursday "discussion" with the staff, expect the memo to double in length. And just wait until the associates and the staff come to their senses, decide to unionize, and turn to Hoffa, who will have little patience for Portnoy's then-hot-off-the-presses union-busting manifesto.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, May 27, 2009 2:23 PM

Even though Portnoy has been Chairman for only two years, there already are a bunch of "old sayings" about Portnoy. As to Portnoy's "Associate New Paradigm Manifesto," the most apt of the "old sayings" is "The longer the memo, the bigger the lie." When Portnoy has his Thursday "discussion" with the staff, expect the memo to double in length. And just wait until the associates and the staff come to their senses, decide to unionize, and turn to Hoffa, who will have little patience for Portnoy's then-hot-off-the-presses union-busting manifesto.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, May 27, 2009 2:24 PM

Even though Portnoy has been Chairman for only two years, there already are a bunch of "old sayings" about Portnoy. As to Portnoy's "Associate New Paradigm Manifesto," the most apt of the "old sayings" is "The longer the memo, the bigger the lie." When Portnoy has his Thursday "discussion" with the staff, expect the memo to double in length. And just wait until the associates and the staff come to their senses, decide to unionize, and turn to Hoffa, who will have little patience for Portnoy's then-hot-off-the-presses union-busting manifesto.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, May 27, 2009 2:24 PM

Even though Portnoy has been Chairman for only two years, there already are a bunch of "old sayings" about Portnoy. As to Portnoy's "Associate New Paradigm Manifesto," the most apt of the "old sayings" is "The longer the memo, the bigger the lie." When Portnoy has his Thursday "discussion" with the staff, expect the memo to double in length. And just wait until the associates and the staff come to their senses, decide to unionize, and turn to Hoffa, who will have little patience for Portnoy's then-hot-off-the-presses union-busting manifesto.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 29, 2009 7:47 AM

LOL Capital Markets (aka TPW SF) is the only profitable dept at SNR - said while cutting STAFF salaries.

Post Your Comment