Add RSS RSS

Law Firm of the Day: Bradley Arant Boult Cummings

e-mail scam.jpgDear sirs. We are a legal blog based in the New York City. One of our Nigerian investors has mysteriously passed away and left us a lot of money. We are trying to increase the number of advertisers on our site, and have a unique proposal for you. We will send you the money and then we would like you buy adds on our site. You can keep some of the money for your trouble. We only want to do this deal with the “Guest” commenter. If you are “Guest,” please send us your bank details to tips@abovethelaw.com and we will send you a check.

We doubt that would work on you, oh savvy ATL readers, but it might work on Bradley Arant Boult Cummings (a firm that came out of Southern merger mania). The firm was recently taken in an e-mail scam and lost $400,000. From the ABA Journal:

The Nashville Post (sub. req.) reported yesterday that the law firm wired more than $400,000 to the foreign bank account of a scammer posing as a client. Lawyers at the firm believed the funds were covered by a check it had deposited—a check that turned out to be phony.

The law firm says it quickly reported the scam to the FBI, leading to the arrest of suspects and the freezing of the funds. “It was an elaborate criminal plan on many levels,” Bradley Arant managing partner John Grenier said in a statement released to the ABA Journal. The firm quickly reported the crime, leading to “the apprehension of the suspects in this scheme and the freezing of the funds.”

How did the firm get taken by the elaborate criminal plan? After the jump.

The ABA Journal says:

A target law firm gets a referral from someone posing as an out-of-state lawyer to enforce a simple contract dispute or to collect a debt from a local corporation. The law firm agrees to represent the “client,” a foreign corporation.

The law firm sends a demand letter, the debtor forwards a check, and the law firm deposits the check in its trust account. It then wires the money to the bank account of the foreign client, after keeping part of the sum for fees and costs.

“Things fall apart,” the TBA says, “when the bank on which the check is drawn notifies everyone that the check is a counterfeit fraud—by which time it is too late to stop the wire transfer, and the law firm’s client trust account is now out the proceeds.”

No word on whether the foreign corporation to which Bradley Arant sent funds was based in Nigeria.

Bradley Arant Reportedly Scammed Out of More Than $400K [ABA Journal]
TBA scam warning comes too late for one major firm [Nashville Post]

Earlier: Law Firm Merger Mania: Mid-Size Mergers in the South and Midwest

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:28 PM

What's a "frim"? Sounds kinky.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:28 PM

First First First!!!

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:29 PM

Not first...but frist!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:30 PM

Dems to raise taxes by $600 BILLION to pay for the destruction that is gov't-run health care:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aqLNecbH0dcg

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:30 PM

For those who lack the work necessary to contribute meaningfully to their billable hour requirements: http://www.419eater.com/

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:33 PM

A true NYC firm would never fall for a trick like that.

7 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:35 PM

I don't buy that this hick (I can't even bring myself to call it a non-peer firm) outift was scammed. I believe that they have conspired with scam artists in Nigeria to "lose" money so that they can offset their income on their tax business schedules. The money is there somewhere. If I am wrong, then each attorney at this firm that was "scammed" deserves to have their law licensed revoked retroactive to their bar admission date.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:35 PM

"Things fall apart . . . " , eh? Any good chicken and rice recipes out there?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:37 PM

Things fall apart and the center cannot hold.

W.B. Yeats

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:39 PM

Undoubtedly a member of their accounting staff neglected to wait until the phoney check cleared before sending out the money. Whomever signed the check should have inquired, but it is not surprising this occurred.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:41 PM

Elie,

I am still waiting on the apology you owe me for using the racial slur "hillbilly." Even if the ad had been racist, which it clearly was not, that did not give you the right to then also use a racial slur.

Sincerely,

Cracka McWhitey

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:45 PM

6, a "true" NYC firm? As opposed to a "false one"? Moron.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:46 PM

agree with 10. we won't even forward on $100 until the check clears. holy bookkeeper tickler batman.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:51 PM

Heh, gotta love it, but yeah, what firm forwards on a settlement, especially for that kind of money, without waiting for the first check to clear?

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:57 PM

The check did "clear", but in doing so it stole from a legit fund. When the legit fund realized what happened they contacted the bank that cleared the check. Too late at that point.

But thanks for all the retarded comments about how you crack-lawyers would have been astute enough to wait until the check cleared.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 4:59 PM

They should pay attention to other legal publications. Similar thing reported in January.
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202427594436

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:01 PM

16, thanks for the post, I couldn't access the Nashville Post story, but I'm pretty surprised that the firm would fall that sort of thing...then again, who knows?

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:11 PM

15 = BABC Hack. Instead of being an apologist for your senior partner who should know better, but was obviously too easily lured by the scent of easy money, maybe you all should be checking the ABA Journal.

This scam has been old news for over a year. So no, we wouldn't get scammed.

http://abajournal.com/news/e_mail_scam_targeting_law_firms_ensnares_a_lawyer_in_atlanta

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:13 PM

6--

You're right. A true NY firm would just fall apart due to lost clients, failed management decisions, and poor salary schedules.

20 Posted by Chinua_Achebe | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:18 PM

I suppose I'm no longer the only thing from Nigeria that makes "Things Fall Apart."

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:23 PM

The law allows for a check to provisionally clear, but the bank from which the check is drawn has additional time to verify it. As such, it shows up in the trust account as having cleared, but such clearance is provisional only. When the originating bank discovers the check is actually counterfeit, it can still stop payment.

What's interesting isn't the bookkeeping error (which, as discussed, isn't necessarily an error). What _is_ interesting is that a lawyer at a reasonably well respected regional firm couldn't see through the abysmal grammar in the emails. I get them every day because they just pull addresses from state bar directories; the grammar and word choice screams scam. (e.g. "Dear Esteemed Council [sic]:")

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:26 PM

To genius @ 18 -

I don't work for BABC, and I think they're idiots to fall for this scam. I was simply pointing out the stupidity of people on here claiming that their brilliant decision to wait until a check cleared would have avoided this scam. The check had cleared - there was no way to know or suspect it was fraudulent at that point. However, the firm should have recognized the scam for what it was well before this happened.

-15

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:29 PM

19,

Uhhhh, I don't believe BABC is actually killing it right now, given their heavy reliance on finance and real estate. In any event, since you are the expert on true NY firms, could a true NY firm get an updated website within 6 1/2 months following an announced merger? It guess that is only slightly more difficult than falling for a well known scam.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:34 PM

20 great find of thumbnail!!!

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:34 PM

Finally! A chance to break out the Chinua Achebe shtick. Well done.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:38 PM

So I can blame BABC for all the retarded lawsuit scam spam that hits my email? ("Enforce this Chinese contract!", "My wife got raped by federal agents!") If it didn't work on jackasses like this, scammers wouldn't be trying their stupidity on the rest of us...

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:45 PM

Even TTThompson Hine wouldn't fall for this.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:47 PM

You cannot con an honest man; nor an honest law firm.

29 Posted by Chinua_Achebe | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:48 PM

TTThings Fall Apart: A Sequel.

30 Posted by Chinua_Achebe | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:49 PM

TTThings Fall Apart: A Sequel. New York Times Notable.

31 Posted by Chinua_Achebe | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:49 PM

TTThings Fall Apart: A Sequel. New York Times Notable.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:55 PM

20 - You almost singlehandedly restored my faith in the collective intellect and humor of the commenters on this webpage.

Slow clap!

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:55 PM

Who is the partner at BoulTTT that got conned?

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 5:58 PM

I initially thought the Nigerian part of this blog was written by Elie. I'm still not convinced that it wasn't

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 6:18 PM

I was presented with one of these scams and it really did look legit -- it did not have all the mispellings and tell tale marks of the common email scams. The used a real out of state lawyers name and set up a website and all with his alleged background that coincided with the guy's actual bar profile. The fatal flaw was that I didn't think the lawyer would be referring out a decent sized collection case. I called the actual guy. Scam foiled. But, really it was pretty darn sophisticated. Lots of collection agencies have been taken on these as well.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 6:32 PM

35: Did this happen to you before or after the advent of the internet? Seems to me that anyone getting duped with this after the proliferation of information out there regarding this very same scam almost deserves to be taken, as bad as that sounds. As you note, it is the promise of a ridiculously large fee which drives the firm to this end result.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 6:50 PM

Boring Arrogant is the worst. The only wannabe white shoe lawfirm in B'ham. Total snobs....

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 7:03 PM

Kash, why you have to call out Nigeria? You can't spell Australia, Israel or United Kingdom?

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 8:40 PM

Fifty bucks says Elie wrote the "Dear Sirs." letter at the beginning of this post.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 10:19 PM

Note to BABC - there is this really neat, cutting edge company out there called "Dun and Bradstreet." You might want to check it out. They perform a "credit check," and verify whether a company is "real."

We use them quite often in between eating your lunch and avoiding embarrassing public scandals.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 12, 2009 10:53 PM

40 - You're a dummy. D&B COULD tell you if the company was real, but they likely wouldn't be able to tell you if the check was a fake.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 13, 2009 8:47 AM

Maybe in a better economy, firms wouldn't fall for this scam, but everyone's so desperate for work that no one (at least not this firm) cares to check whether the client is real. So, even if the check "cleared," I have no sympathy.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 13, 2009 11:21 AM

9, meet 20.

Things Fall Apart = title of a novel by Chinua Achebe about the perils of modernization in Nigeria.

And as much as I hate to agree with PE, these guys are hicks. A co-worker got a similar email (the sender purported to be an officer of a Chinese corporation seeking representation to collect a debt). It took all of 5 minutes on google to figure out the scam.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 13, 2009 11:49 AM

$400,000 ?!?!?! That could buy a lot of hookers from Craigslist. Whoops..... You mean that is a scam as well?!?!? Where your mugshot is taken by the cops and posted on their website for the world to see???

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 13, 2009 1:24 PM

It would seem odd to me to get a referral for commercial work totally out of the blue. Whenever we look for local counsel or another firm to recommend to a client, we ask around for recommendations. When I call others to refer case, they always want to know who referred me to them. I always want to know the same thing - just to know who to thank usually. It will now definitely raise red flags for me if someone calls randomly.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 13, 2009 4:15 PM

41 -- You are totally right, 40 is a dummie. I can't tell you how many legitimate companies that have a D&B profile that shows a substantial operating and credit history pay with fake checks. It's gotten so bad, our firm has had to set up a special section in accounting that use to handle all of the legitimate companies paying with fake checks. Caused us quite a tizzy.

Oh, of course there is the occasional scamster that pretends he is from a legitimate company. We have a tool for that too. It's called "directory assistance." We use this "directory assistance" to get a phone number for the real company and the we call them. It's pretty sophisticated stuff.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 15, 2009 4:10 PM

Can't you people read:

"The law firm says it quickly reported the scam to the FBI, leading to the arrest of suspects and the freezing of the funds."

You are making posts like the crooks got away with it and the money is smoke. They didn't according to the actual post.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 15, 2009 4:27 PM

47: Does it really matter if the crooks got away or they didn't? The reality is that the fools fell for an obvious and well known scam.

Sincerely,

BoulTTT

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 15, 2009 4:39 PM

48,

Did you really expect any different with the likes of Partner Bubba who was made a partner because his granddaddy owned one of the original firms? Of course they fell for it or all that inbreeding would be for naught.

47

Post Your Comment