Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Salary Cut Watch: Buchanan Ingersoll

Salary Cuts.jpgAnother day, and another firm is retreating from the salaries of the past. Our sources report that Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney has decided to cut associate salaries between 5% and 10%.

The cuts will affect all class years.

Buchanan Ingersoll CEO Jack Barbour furnished Above the Law with this statement. Barbour suggests that the cuts are in part to due to Buchanan’s attempts to keep its billing rates competitive in this recession economy:

The firm generally has reduced associate compensation at a rate of between 5 and 10% per year. Certain associates may receive a higher or lesser reduction based on individual circumstances. This decision was not an easy one, but we feel that it is in the best interest of the firm and our clients to maintain the quality of service our clients have come to expect while keeping our rates at competitive levels.

The firm did not elaborate on what those individual circumstances might be.

Our sources believe the cuts will be based on hours, but you never know. Wouldn’t it be funny if the firm did it alphabetically. Nobody would be expecting that! It’s good to keep people on their toes.

It’s a little surprising that the firm cut salaries while summers are in the office, simply because the summers are only around for a short period of time. Buchanan scaled back this year’s summer program to seven weeks.

But if cutting salaries now saves jobs later, associates and summers might be all for it.

Earlier: Summer Cuts at Buchanan Ingersoll

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:11 PM

firstttttttttttttt

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:12 PM

Fifthhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:12 PM

Pershiy!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:13 PM

It's a little surprising that the firm cut salaries while summers we in the office, simply because the summers are only around for a short period of time.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:14 PM

If Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney is hurting, the world must be coming to an end.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:15 PM

Skadden has cut summers to two and a half weeks. But they are raising starting salaries as per NALP.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:15 PM

Fuck you moderator!

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:16 PM

Comment eaten (what else!) by moderator.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:17 PM

[Pat] Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:17 PM

2 - ne pershiy a druhiy

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:19 PM

QUINN REMAINS

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:21 PM

I'm also curious as to what the deal is with Skadden and the TBD on their NALP entry.

Oh and sucks about the trend to lower pay.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:22 PM

Instead of "summers we in the office," did you mean "summers ARE in the office" or "summers BE in the office?"

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:24 PM

13 = racist.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:24 PM

to 10 - pravda

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:26 PM

14=Al Sharpton, aka racebaiter

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:27 PM

BI should have canned half of the Klett Rooney guys when they merged. Only a matter of time before the axe starts swinging over there.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:28 PM

Fuck you moderator!

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:34 PM

Surely Elie,

One of these crack interns could be making the Sanford emails available and RELEVANT to Big Law. Isnt he represented by Cravath or something?

"Two, mutual feelings .... You have a particular grace and calm that I adore. You have a level of sophistication that so fitting with your beauty. I could digress and say that you have the ability to give magnificent gentle kisses, or that I love your tan lines or that I love the curve of your hips, the erotic beauty of you holding yourself (or two magnificent parts of yourself) in the faded glow of the night's light - but hey, that would be going into sexual details ..."

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:35 PM

I've been wondering: Is the ship still floating, or is its current condition something short of total seaworthiness? If the latter, please describe that condition, preferably in nonstandard English.

Thanks in advance.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:38 PM

the ship be sinking

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:39 PM

The dick be stinkin...

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:40 PM

20, the coast guard has been alerted. Michael Ray Richardson is coordinating the rescue efforts.

19, that is beautiful. Reminds me of Lord Byron.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:42 PM

20-22: hilarious

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:44 PM

If my pay was getting cut and the summer associates weren't, I'd make them pay for my lunch.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:45 PM

Someone explain this to me. Do salary reductions correlate only to firms reducing billing rates to clients or are some firms keeping billing rates the same and keeping more money in the coffers for things such as partner profits?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:50 PM

I'm a stud associate, so I insist on getting the HIGHEST reduction!

Oh, wait....

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:57 PM

Is the Tampa office still headed up by a known and habitual sexual harasser? Pittsburgh was put on notice years ago.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:01 PM

22 - the pussy be fartin'

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:13 PM

5 and 10% per year?

so eventually be paid nothing? Or maybe that should be "class year"

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:15 PM

28--huh?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:19 PM

This firm is a joke. They took literally the dumbest and biggest bitch from my graduating class in 08. She was the smartest person she knew.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:32 PM

No. No Elie, that wouldn't be funny.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:43 PM

They are also canning associates right now - at least 2 confirmed

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:58 PM

The news has really slowed down. Shouldn't there be some good summer associate scandals to report? Or is everybody behaving themselves in the hopes of getting an offer?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:08 PM

Each betrayal begins with trust

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:11 PM

Do these salary cuts qualify as genocide? Should we notify the ICC or some other international tribunal?

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:18 PM

They not only cut already below market associate salaries the firm put the associates on a monthly pay cycle. The greedy partners still get bi-weekly checks.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:19 PM

No rate cuts. In fact, rates were raised this year. Including the rates of first year associates.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:22 PM

Klett lawyers will sink Buchanan
prepare the obit

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:23 PM

Is Dildeena Thompson a partner at this firm?

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:23 PM

Can we get a roundup of associate salaries? Interesting to compare pay now that some firms have cut and some have frozen pay (effective cuts for anyone over first year).

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:36 PM

can the new CEO sink two firms

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:40 PM

What was Buchanan paying before the cuts - they were lockstep, right? If cuts will be different for each associate does that also mean a break from lock step for them?

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 25, 2009 11:53 PM

ATL helped drive up associate salaries and perks in the good times and now appears to be doing the opposite. The question is why. This is supposed to be a site that advocates for associates (or least was before Elie took over).

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 26, 2009 8:53 AM

BI has been doing stealth layoffs for almost a year. They are supposedly laying-off 10-15 more associates soon. I'm really suprised they've been able to keep it hushed up so well.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 26, 2009 11:39 AM

#26 - as in-house counsel, I have found that billing rates are NOT going down. I personally think partners would rather lay off associates and cut their salaries while still keeping billing rates the same (or raise them) just to make sure they can still live the luxurious life at the expense of everyone else.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 26, 2009 11:40 AM

#26 - as in-house counsel, I have found that billing rates are NOT going down. I personally think partners would rather lay off associates and cut their salaries while still keeping billing rates the same (or raise them) just to make sure they can still live the luxurious life at the expense of everyone else.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 26, 2009 1:52 PM

wow i am surprised people care about this firm

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 26, 2009 2:00 PM

wow i am surprised people care about this firm

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 26, 2009 4:18 PM

I just feel bad for the New York office. Apparently it's being run by an incompetent partner and his dad, who seem to care only about lining their own pockets (at the expense of their associates and clients).

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 26, 2009 5:32 PM

things getting worse. Firm forced to reduce monthy partner compensation. Sound like Wolf Block II

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 27, 2009 3:27 PM

This is the problem with law firms. They are run by lawyers instead of people with business proficiency.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 28, 2009 4:42 PM

Crap firm. What more can be said? Any firm that has to cut pay is a firm that is hurting financially. I don't particularly care how the firms try to spin this kind of crap. They know full well that they are now no longer competing for the best talent. And, now they'll get to enjoy commodity work exclusively. Good move, guys.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:52 PM

While Barbour said it is never pleasant to cut people's compensation, he added, "I don't worry about the decisions we make nearly as much as I worry about what I should be doing that I'm not thinking about doing."
That tells it all

Post Your Comment